Multidisciplinary Approach to Stricturing Crohn’s Disease: Medical Versus Endoscopic Versus Surgical Therapy


List of Abbreviations

ADA

Adalimumab

aOR

Adjusted odds ratio

AZA

Azathioprine

CCA

Colo-colonic anastomosis

CD

Crohn's disease

CI

Confidence interval

CTE

Computed tomography enterography

EBD

Endoscopic balloon dilation

ES

Endoscopic stricturotomy

GI

Gastrointestinal

H-M

Heineke–Mikulicz

HR

Hazard ratio

IBD

Inflammatory bowel disease

ICA

Ileocolonic anastomosis

ICR

Ileocolonic resection

IFX

Infliximab

IRA

Ileorectal anastomosis

MRE

Magnetic resonance enterography

NKSt

Needle knife stricturotomy

NSAID

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug

OR

Odds ratio

RCT

Randomized control trial

SICUS

Small intestine contrast ultrasonography

STX

Stricturoplasty

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor

US

Ultrasonography

Acknowledgments

Dr. Bo Shen is supported by the Ed and Joey Story Endowed Chair.

Introduction

Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by segmental, transmural inflammation of the gut wall, which can affect any part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. CD has been categorized into inflammatory (B1), fibrostenotic (B2), and penetrating (B3) phenotypes, based on the Montreal Classification. The majority of patients would have B1 at presentation and as time goes by, B2 and B3 become predominant phenotypes. In fact, one-third of CD patients develop strictures within 10 years after diagnosis. According to the Montreal Classification, strictures are defined as ‘constant luminal narrowing on endoscopy, imaging, or surgery’ with prestenotic dilation or obstructive signs without penetrating disease. This definition may fail to include all patients with true stricture. In fact, stricture with prestenotic lumen dilation can be present. A number of clinical and genetic factors have been associated with the development of strictures in CD patients including ileocolonic disease location, long disease duration, severe disease, and NOD2/CARD15 mutations. There are ongoing studies in the biomarkers for intestinal fibrosis, with one of the goals being the prediction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)–related strictures. The candidate markers include NOD2/CARD15 gene variants, microRNAs, extracellular matrix proteins (e.g., collagen and fibronectin), enzymes (e.g., tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1), growth factors (e.g., basic fibroblast growth factor, YKL-40), anti- Saccharomyces cerevisiae , and circulating fibrocytes.

Crohn's stricture can occur anywhere along the GI tract, predominantly at the terminal ileum, surgical anastomotic site, or colon. The pathogenetic pathways of stricture formation involve tissue healing and remodeling process to chronic inflammation in the intestinal walls with fibrosis and hypertrophy of muscularity propria and muscularis mucosae. Patients with strictures may or may not have the symptoms. Symptoms associated with strictures range from postprandial abdominal bloating, nausea, and distension to frank intestinal obstruction. CD strictures have been treated with medications, endoscopy (endoscopic balloon dilation [EBD] and endoscopic stricturotomy [ES]), and surgery (bowel resection and strictureplasty [STX]). Medical therapy is routinely used for the treatment of B1 and B3 CD. However, medical therapy has a limited role in treating stricturing CD, especially in those with fibrosis being predominant.

Approximately 80% of the CD patients would eventually require at least one bowel resection surgery surgical resection within 10 years after diagnosis. Bowel resection or STX is not a curative surgery, and postoperative disease recurrence is common. It was reported that disease recurrence at the neoterminal ileum developed in 70% of the patients within a year of surgery, and 40% of these patients would need additional surgery within 4 years. Therefore conservative surgical approaches like STX have gained popularity. Nonetheless, surgical treatment is more effective and definitive in treating stricture than medical approach. Endoscopic therapy plays a growing role in the management of CD strictures, bridging medical and surgical therapy.

Medical Therapy

The last 2 decades have witnessed availability and a wide spread of various biological agents for the treatment of CD as well as ulcerative colitis (UC). Despite mucosal or tissue healing, there is concern that the rapid healing may predispose to strictures or aggravate existing strictures, leading to obstructive symptoms.

Efficacy of Medical Therapy for Stricturing CD

One of the most important goals of medical therapy for IBD is to modify its natural history and to prevent complications, such as stricture and fistula. Therefore, aggressive medical therapy, such as the top-down approach (i.e., the use of biological agents in early disease course) or combined biological agent and immunomodulator therapy, in patients at high risk for CD complications when B1 phenotype is still a predominant presentation.

Once stricture has already formed, it is not clear whether medical therapy is beneficial, effective, or harmful in treating CD stricture is controversial. Some investigators have proposed that patients with stricturing CD may have a course of treatment with corticosteroids to reduce the concurrent inflammation on stricture and above stricture. Earlier published data from the TREAT Registry and ACCENT I trial suggest a possible increased likelihood of intestinal stenosis, stricture, or obstructions after infliximab (IFX) therapy. However, multivariate analysis showed that the development of stenosis, stricture, or obstruction was associated only with severity, duration, ileal location, and corticosteroid use, but not with the use of IFX. The efficacy of IFX in treating strictures, inflammatory or noninflammatory, was reported in small case series. A study of 241 CD patients which included enterography-proven “low-risk strictures” showed that the use of immunomodulators or biological agents decreased the need for surgery in 50% of the patients during a median follow-up of 607 days, suggesting that the use of biologics may change the natural course of CD. A recent study in the correlation between response to medical therapy and MRI findings of small bowel CD reported that patients with narrowed intestine and prestenotic lumen dilation were less likely to respond to medical therapy than those with no stenosis. A recent multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study of adalimumab (ADA) in 97 patients with CD and symptomatic small bowel strictures was performed. At week 24, 62 (64%) patients had achieved success as defined as ADA continuation without prohibited treatment with other agents. After a median follow-up time of 3.8 years, 46% ± 7% of patients who were in success at week 24 (i.e., 29% of the whole cohort) were still in prolonged success at 4 years. For the whole cohort, 51% ± 5.3% of the patients did not have bowel resection surgery for 4 years. However, serious adverse events were reported in 70 of 97 (72%) patients. But whether there was an exacerbation of stricture was not specified.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here