Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease


The great successes of congenital heart surgery have created a new class of cardiology patient: the adult with congenital heart disease (CHD). It is estimated that there are nearly three million patients older than 18 years of age with CHD in Europe and North America, and for the first time ever there are more adults living with congenital heart defects than children with CHD. Cardiac arrhythmias of all varieties ( Table 17.1 ) are prevalent in the adult group, often complex and difficult to manage, and significantly complicate the long-term care of these patients.

TABLE 17.1
Listing of Specific Congenital Heart Disease Lesions and Associated Arrhythmias
Lesion IART AFIB WPW VT/SCD SAN DYSFXN SPONT
AV-BLK
SURGAV-BLK Twin AV Nodes
ASD (late repair) + + +
ASD (Holt-Oram syndrome) + ++
VSD (transatrial repair) + +
VSD (repair through ventriculotomy) + +
Common AV canal defect + + ++
Tetralogy of Fallot ++ ++ +
Congenital aortic stenosis + ++ +
Coarctation aorta (residual gradient or late repair) ++
Congenital mitral valve disease + ++ +
Ebstein’s Anomaly ++ + +++ +
D-TGA (Mustard or Senning) +++ ++ +++
L-TGA + + ++ + +++ ++
Single ventricle (atrio-pulmonary Fontan) +++ + + +++
Single ventricle (new-style Fontan) + + +
Single ventricle (palliated) + ++ +
Heterotaxy (right atrial isomerism) + ++
Heterotaxy (left atrial isomerism) + +++ ++
+, Occasional; ++, moderately frequent; +++, very frequent.
AFIB, Atrial fibrillation; ASD, atrial septal defect; AV, atrioventricular; CHD, congenital heart disease; D-TGA, D-looped transposition of the great arteries; IART, intraatrial reentrant tachycardia; L-TGA, L-looped or “congenitally corrected” transposition of the great arteries; SAN DYSFXN, sinoatrial node dysfunction; SPONT AV-BLK, spontaneous atrioventricular block; SURG AV-BLK, surgically acquired atrioventricular block; VSD, ventricular septal defect; VT/SCD , ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death; WPW, Wolff Parkinson White syndrome.

Cellular cardiac electrophysiology in CHD patients is thought to be generally similar to that of the normal population, but anatomic malformations, the effects of a variety of hemodynamic and environmental stressors, and surgical scarring produce a complex arrhythmogenic substrate. The result is a high and increasing frequency of acquired arrhythmias that are rarely seen in normal young adult hearts, including atrial and ventricular reentrant tachycardias, heart block, and sinus node dysfunction. In addition, any arrhythmias prevalent in the normal population may also occur in CHD.

The presence of CHD significantly alters arrhythmia risk, its potential severity, and the safety and feasibility of various therapies. Clinical manifestations of arrhythmia in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) range from clinically occult arrhythmia to sudden death, which is the mode of death in 20% to 25% of ACHD patients. Incessant arrhythmias may cause progressive hemodynamic deterioration and are associated with thrombosis and embolic events. Symptoms, frequent need for hospitalization, and adverse effects of antiarrhythmic drugs constitute a significant burden on quality of life. Risk assessment for identification of patients appropriately treated with implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) is difficult because ACHD populations are small, anatomically diverse, and have relatively low rates of sudden death. Recently, research on the natural history and management of arrhythmia in ACHD has been carefully collated and examined, and evidence-based recommendations for care have become available. In this context, this review addresses the identification, evaluation, and management of the more common forms of arrhythmia seen in ACHD.

Bradycardia

sinus node dysfunction

Gradual loss of sinus rhythm occurs over time after the Mustard and Senning operations and after all varieties of Fontan procedures, along with attenuated chronotropic response. Patients with heterotaxy syndromes, particularly left atrial isomerism, may also have congenital abnormalities of the sinus node. Loss of sinus rhythm appears to increase risk of mortality, may be hemodynamically adverse, and is associated with the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial tachycardias.

Direct surgical injury to the sinus node artery and the node itself has been observed and may be the cause of long-term sinus node dysfunction in some patients. However, loss of sinus rhythm is observed to occur in populations of ACHD patients over decades, which implies the action of other ongoing processes most likely related to scarring and chronic hemodynamic abnormality. Abnormalities of atrial electrophysiology identified in postoperative CHD patients include prolonged sinus node recovery times, intraatrial conduction times, and atrial refractoriness.

Atrioventricular Block

Interventricular conduction abnormalities and particularly right bundle-branch block are common after CHD surgery, but complete and permanent postoperative heart block is rare in recent decades, occurring in 1% to 3% of cases. It is most often seen in small patients undergoing repair of ventricular septal defects (VSDs) of any sort and after left ventricular outflow tract and mitral valve surgeries and is caused by direct surgical injury to the specialized conduction system or by indirect damage due to inflammatory response. In the era before cardiac pacing systems appropriate for ACHD patients were widely available, postoperative heart block had an extremely high mortality rate, even when an escape rhythm was present.

Complete heart block also occurs spontaneously in patients with certain structural heart defects, especially endocardial cushion defects and congenitally corrected transposition, plausibly related to the aberrant anatomy of the specialized conduction system that renders them vulnerable. Heart block may progress at any stage of life in these patients, irrespective of surgery.

Pacemaker Issues

Pacing is clearly indicated for high-grade heart block in ACHD, most commonly encountered in the postoperative patient. Clinical experience demonstrates the value of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and favors implantation of dual-chamber pacemakers if size and access permit, but the value of “physiologic” as compared with simpler pacing modalities is not well established in ACHD. Other indications such as sinus node dysfunction with or without concomitant atrial tachycardia are more controversial, and recommendations have largely been based on clinical judgment. In patients with sinus node dysfunction and junctional escape rhythms, severe resting bradycardia, chronotropic incompetence, and/or prolonged pauses, pacing may alleviate symptoms of fatigue, dizziness, or syncope. In asymptomatic patients, decisions to pace for hemodynamic indications are unclear and must be coordinated with careful plans for clinical re-evaluation on follow-up.

Options for cardiac pacing in ACHD patients may be limited because of congenital and acquired abnormalities of systemic venous and cardiovascular anatomy. The presence of an intracardiac shunt increases the risk of stroke, limiting some patients to epicardial lead placement. Placement of atrial leads by epicardial or transvenous route may be technically challenging and must avoid inadvertent stimulation of the phrenic nerve. Excellent sensing of atrial electrical activity by pacing systems is crucial to avoid asynchronous atrial pacing, which may provoke atrial tachycardia. The effect of these technical constraints is that pacing systems must not infrequently be adapted on an individual basis to patient-specific lead placement and maintenance issues ( Fig. 17.1 ).

Figure 17.1, Chest x-ray from a 32-year-old with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (L-TGA), complete heart block, ventricular tachycardia, and a failing systemic (“right”) ventricle. A transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) system with leads for chronic resynchronization pacing is in place. The atrial lead and the ICD shock/pace lead were positioned from the left subclavian vein in the usual fashion via the superior vena cava to the right atrium and subpulmonary (“left”) ventricle. There was ostial atresia of the coronary sinus, which confounded positioning of the second ventricular pacing lead into the coronary venous system. Fortunately, a small persistent left superior vena cava was identified draining to the coronary sinus, which allowed effective positioning for the systemic (“right”) ventricular pacing lead.

Recently, the utility of cardiac resynchronization effected by multisite pacing has been investigated in ACHD. Acute hemodynamic studies and small clinical series suggest the possibility that both left and right ventricular resynchronization may have some clinical value, but also highlight the fact that it is exceedingly difficult to construct validated and reproducible measures of ventricular function in this heterogeneous and anatomically complex population. At present, the only class I indication for resynchronization in patients with CHD are those with a systemic left ventricle (LV) and complete left bundle branch block with a QRS greater than 150 ms in duration.

Atrial Tachycardias

Macroreentrant atrial tachycardias, often denoted as intraatrial reentrant tachycardias (IARTs), are prevalent in many adults with congenital heart defects, including both atypical reentry circuits and more typical forms of atrial flutter noted to occur in the normal heart. These tachycardias tend to have a relatively stable cycle length and P-wave morphology, suggesting that they are organized by a fixed substrate. They are most common among patients who have undergone surgical procedures involving extensive atrial dissection and repair. The importance of surgical injury to the atrium is supported by observations in animal models patterned after Mustard and Fontan surgeries, which reliably cause tachycardias similar to those seen clinically. Atrial tachyarrhythmias are associated with hemodynamic issues and thromboembolism. Although stroke after cardioversion in ACHD patients seems rare, intravascular and intracardiac thromboses are associated with atrial tachycardias, with a prevalence of intracardiac thrombi in 42% of patients undergoing echocardiography before cardioversion has been reported.

Increased risk for mortality is also observed, with predictors of mortality including several factors that cooccur with atrial tachycardias, including single ventricle physiology and unfavorable hemodynamics. Late follow-up of patients with a prior surgical history of Fontan, Mustard, or Senning procedures suggests mortality including sudden cardiac death at a rate of 1% to 2% per year. Risk factors identified for IART include older age at operation and length of follow-up. About one-half of patients with classic right atrial–right ventricular or atriopulmonary Fontan procedures develop IART within 10 years of surgery. Those who undergo the lateral tunnel variant of the procedure with cavopulmonary connection or the extracardiac Fontan operation may be at lower risk. Patients who have had a Mustard and Senning procedure for transposition of great arteries are at risk of developing sinus node dysfunction and IART, often concurrently. IART is more prevalent than ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and more likely to be associated with symptoms.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here