Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Blood pressure measurement is part of the routine assessment during clinic or hospital-delivered cancer care, but should also be measured at home where possible, especially in patients receiving oral cancer therapy, such as vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFIs; weekly during the first cycle, then every 2 to 3 weeks).
The treatment goal during VEGFI therapy should be less than 130/80 mm Hg, ideally, and not above 140/90 mm Hg in general, balancing risk and benefit of cardiovascular and oncologic treatment.
Cancer therapies can usually be continued if blood pressure elevation is in the absence of clinically evident end-organ effects and can be managed with anti-hypertensive drugs.
Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists (diltiazem, verapamil) should be avoided in patients on VEGF and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors because of drug-drug interactions.
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARBs) should be used carefully in patients with cancer at risk of or with evident volume depletion.
Hypertension should prompt an evaluation of renal function in patients with cancer, including assessment for proteinuria, because it might be part of a broader syndrome.
Worsening renal function, acute on chronic, or acute kidney injury (AKI) is not uncommon; categories include prerenal, intrarenal, and postrenal factors as seen in the general population, but with some unique nuances relating mainly to cancer therapies.
The development of AKI should prompt a nephrology, ideally onco-nephrology, consultation as well as multidisciplinary discussions on cancer therapy.
Most cancer therapeutics that have been associated with hypertension have an antiangiogenic, vascular effect in common. The classic examples of this are VEGFIs. Indeed, the introduction of VEGFIs highlighted the importance of blood pressure management in the context of cancer therapy. VEGFI treatment causes an increase in blood pressure in almost all patients (up to 60% to 80% of patients in clinical trials). In a carefully characterized registry cohort, 73% of patients with renal cell cancer receiving targeted therapy (mainly VEGFI), developed cardiovascular toxicity, 55% of which was accounted for by hypertension. VEGFI-associated hypertension develops quickly, and may be difficult to treat, interferring with the delivery of optimal anti-cancer VEGFI therapy. , In addition to the acute effects of hypertension, as patients survive longer and receive VEGFIs for prolonged periods, the risk of chronic end-organ effects of hypertension, including myocardial ischaemia and infarction, heart failure, renal dysfunction, and stroke, are of increasing concern.
Variability in the definitions used for clinical trial reporting, together with blood pressure thresholds that are greater than those in evidence-based hypertension guidelines, means that the incidence of VEGFI-associated hypertension may be underestimated. , , Additionally, patients with complicated hypertension or a history of cardiovascular disease are usually excluded from clinical trials and accordingly the real world incidence of VEGFI-associated hypertension may be higher than reported. , There have, however, been efforts to improve standardization of the definition of VEGFI-associated hypertension, with recommendations that such a diagnosis requires that the blood pressure be greater than 140/90 mm Hg on two to three occasions at least one week apart for most patients. The threshold for diagnosis is lower (130/80 mm Hg) for patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus or renal impairment. , , These definitions are based in large part on earlier guidelines where blood pressure targets were set at 140/90 mm Hg. However, many major current guidelines have lowered the definition of hypertension to a cutoff of 130/80 mm Hg and, accordingly, the definition of VEGFI-induced hypertension may also require modification. Based on the effect of VEGFI on the endothelium and the vasculature, these patients can be viewed as being at higher risk in general.
Within hours to days of starting treatment with VEGFIs, blood pressure rises in a dose-dependent manner. , , This is potentiated when multiple anti-angiogenic agents are used in combination. In patients with renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib, blood pressure increased by an average of 14/11 mm Hg in the first week of treatment and by 22/17 mm Hg in the second week. This effect was persistent during sunitinib treatment, but reversed rapidly once VEGFI was withdrawn. The rapid and early rise in blood pressure can provoke acute complications, for example, in patients not previously ‘conditioned’ to the effects of hypertension an acute rise in blood pressure can precipitate acute end-organ complications, such as stroke, myocardial ischaemia, heart failure, and acute kidney injury at a lower threshold than might be expected in patients with long-standing hypertension. Posterior reversible leukoencephalopathy can occur, although this is rare (<1% of patients treated with VEGFI). Clinical signs and symptoms include headache, confusion, seizures, and visual impairment. Magnetic resonance T2-weighed imaging of the brain reveals edema, classically within the posterior fossa. The underlying pathophysiology seems to be related to the combination of hypertension, impaired cerebral autoregulation and cerebrovascular permeability/endothelial dysfunction. Importantly, with early recognition/diagnosis, prompt treatment of hypertension, and withdrawal of VEGFI therapy, the, prognosis is favorable.
The mechanisms responsible for VEGFI-associated hypertension remain incompletely defined, but alterations in vascular tone appear to be of fundamental importance. Proposed mechanisms include endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, upregulation of the endothelin-1 system, activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system, capillary rarefaction, and vascular remodelling as well as renal dysfunction with impaired sodium handling and increased salt sensitivity. There is a complex relationship between these various factors, and the relative contribution of each mechanism may vary at different stages in the progression of acute hypertensive effects through to sustained and chronically elevated blood pressures. Combination of VEGFI and other anti-cancer drugs may amplify hypertension and renal toxicity. For instance, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, treatment with combination VEGFI (bevacizumab) and programmed death 1 inhibitors (atezolizumab), was associated with a higher rate of hypertension and proteinuria than in patients treated with VEGFI (sorafenib) alone.
Conflicting evidence exists regarding risk factors predisposing patients to VEGFI-induced hypertension. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors, including older age (>65 years), previous history of hypertension, smoking, elevated body mass index, and possibly hypercholesterolemia have been linked with an increased risk of VEGF-induced hypertension. , However, other studies have suggested that these factors and others, including a history of vascular disease, reduced renal function, and family history of hypertension or cardiovascular disease are not predictive. ,
As hypertension associated with VEGFI agents occurs as a pharmacodynamic on-target effect, it has been proposed that it may reflect effective inhibition of the VEGF signalling pathway and could be gauged as an indicator of the therapeutic response. Indeed, supportive evidence indicates that the development of VEGFI-associated hypertension is associated with one to two years greater progression-free and overall survival. , In light of this association between the development of hypertension and improved anti-cancer responses, it has been suggested that VEGFI-induced hypertension could be used to define the optimal biologically active doses of VEGFI drugs. However, this suggestion should be considered cautiously and the development of hypertension should not be used as a measure to guide the maximum possible dose of VEGFI agents for individual patients.
Although VEGFIs represent the class of anti-cancer drugs most associated with treatment-induced hypertension, it may also be encountered as a result of other anti-cancer agents, including platinum-based therapies, proteasome inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and as a result of corticosteroid therapy, either alone or as adjuvant therapy. ,
Hypertension is a well-recognized complication of cisplatin-based chemotherapy, noted in 14% to 53% of patients even many years after the completion of therapy. , It is believed that endothelial dysfunction is the main cause of cisplatin-induced hypertension.
Platinum compounds also cause dose-dependent and frequently irreversible nephrotoxicity. The pathophysiologic mechanisms responsible for this are thought to be similar to those seen in the development of hypertension, with endothelial dysfunction as a major factor. In support of this theory, microalbuminuria, a sensitive marker of endothelial dysfunction, is present in up to 22% of patients at least 10 years after cisplatin-based chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer. , Furthermore, patients with microalbuminuria following cisplatin-based chemotherapy have higher blood pressures than those who do not.
Hypertension has been associated with each of the proteasome inhibitors currently in use (bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib), with the majority of cases being low-grade and reversible. Carfilzomib is the most potent anti-myeloma drug in this class and is also most commonly associated with hypertension. In a head-to-head comparsion of bortezomib-based therapy versus carfilzomib-based therapy, grade 1 or 2 hypertension was seen in 6% of patients treated with bortezomib and in 16% of those in the carfilzomib treatment arm. Grade 3 hypertension was evident in 3% and 9% of patients treated with bortezomib and carfilzomib, respectively. Proteasome inhibitor-associated hypertension may be a reflection of reduced nitric oxide bioavailability, with the blood pressure rise often being further exacerbated by the use of corticosteroids.
Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, such as everolimus, sirolimus, and temsirolimus have antitumor activity against a number of malignancies, particularly advanced renal cell carcinoma and breast cancer. Clinical evidence also derives from their widespread use following solid organ transplantation hypertension in up to 30% of patients receiving everolimus and almost 40% of patients treated with sirolimus. The incidence of hypertension as an adverse effect of mTOR inhibitors used in the treatment of malignancy is less well described, although it could be expected to be similarly high. These agents are also associated with the development of proteinuria and edema.
Although blood pressure control is important for patients receiving any form of cancer therapy, the rapid and potentially substantial rise in response to VEGFI means that this group should be considered a particularly high-risk group for whom specific strategies apply ( Table 20.1 ).
All patients should undergo baseline assessment of blood pressure and renal function. | |
Blood pressure should be monitored regularly during treatment: |
|
VEGFI-induced hypertension diagnosed if blood pressure: |
|
If VEGFI-induced hypertension is diagnosed: |
|
Management of complications of VEGFI-induced hypertension: |
|
If VEGFI-induced proteinuria is diagnosed: |
|
In addition to blood pressure monitoring at baseline prior to beginning VEGFI therapy, blood pressure should be monitored regularly throughout treatment. Monitoring is particularly relevant in the early stages of treatment when the risk of acute rises in blood pressure is greatest. , It is recommended that blood pressure be monitored on a weekly basis during the first cycle of treatment and at least every two to three weeks thereafter.
Office blood pressures should be measured based on clinical guidelines, , , , where 3 measurements should be made at least 3 minutes apart and an average taken of the two last readings. Measurements should be made using an appropriately calibrated device with a correctly sized cuff and the patient sitting at rest for 5 minutes. , Home blood pressure monitoring may be appropriate for some patients. If introduced, it is important to provide patients with a blood pressure diary, instructions on accurate self-measurement, and criteria for blood pressure readings that should prompt them to seek attention from their oncologist or medical practitioner. Ideally, blood pressure should be measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during the first week of commencing VEGFI treatment and during each cycle of therapy.
In patients commencing anti-cancer treatment, it is important to maintain a robust approach to blood pressure control, both before and during treatment. Prior to commencing VEGFI therapy, anti-hypertensive treatment should be started in patients with blood pressure above the target levels outlined previously. Where possible, adequate blood pressure control, according to relevant hypertension guidelines, should be achieved before starting treatment. However, this may not always be clinically possible, especially if there is an urgency to commence anti-cancer treatment. Therefore, the decisions regarding timing of anti-cancer therapy and optimization of cardiovascular status and blood pressure control should be made on an individual basis with input from both oncologists and cardiovascular physicians. ,
Although we recommend a target blood pressure less than 130/80 mm Hg prior to commencing VEGFI therapy during treatment, anti-hypertensive therapy should only be commenced to maintain blood pressure less than 140/90 mm Hg. This is in line with the European Society of Cardiology position paper, and National Cancer Institute Drug Steering Committee’s recommendations. , This more lenient blood pressure target during therapy is suggested to reduce the need for delay or interruption of VEGFI therapy and to reduce the risk of iatrogenic hypotension.
In addition, a diagnosis of VEGI-related hypertension should be considered in patients who do not fulfil these blood pressure definitions, but who have a rise of above 20 mm Hg in blood pressure following the initiation of VEGFI therapy. The acute rise in pressure in these patients puts them among the patients at highest risk of hypertensive complications. , All current recommendations for diagnosis and treatment in this patient group are based on expert opinion and general consensus rather than robust clinical evidence.
In line with the published Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0), hypertension is graded 1 to 5 based on severity, with increased grade mandating more intensive blood pressure-lowering therapy, often with more than one drug, as well as increased frequency of blood pressure monitoring and consideration of hospitalization in severe cases.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here