Vascular Malformations of the Spine


Summary of Key Points

  • Spinal vascular malformations involve abnormalities of the arteries or veins that arise in the spinal column. These can occur in the intradural space, either in or around the spinal cord, or have abnormal arterial connections in the dura and extradural space.

  • Dural and extradural vascular malformations account for approximately 80% of spinal vascular malformations.

  • The spinal cord receives blood supply from one anterior artery and paired posterior spinal arteries. Each spinal level has segmental (radicular) arteries that augment these longitudinal arteries. The dominant segmental artery is the artery of Adamkiewitz. Blood from the cord drains through anterior and posterior veins, which communicate with the epidural veins and eventually the dural venous sinuses.

  • Spinal angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing and characterizing spinal vascular lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, including flow voids on T2-weighted images and T2 signal change in the spinal cord, as well as MRI time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories sequences can help guide the location of a possible spinal vascular malformation.

  • Clinical presentation of a vascular malformation can include hemorrhage, myelopathy, progressive neurological decline, back pain, and paresthesia. Diagnosis is often delayed in patients with underwhelming MRI.

  • Treatment depends on the location of the vascular malformation, but often includes microsurgical resection or ligation, embolization, or radiation therapy.

History and Nomenclature

Spinal vascular malformations encompass a broad family of angiopathic abnormalities affecting the blood supply to the spinal cord and its associated structures. They are generally rare, usually presenting clinically with myelopathies, radiculopathies, and other neurological deficits secondary to hemorrhage, ischemia as a consequence of vascular steal, or cord compression. The earliest description of spinal vascular malformations was put forth by pathologist Rudolf Virchow in 1863, who detailed two groups of what he termed “neoplasms”: angioma cavernosum, without parenchyma between the affected blood vessels, and angioma racemosum or hamartoma, in which affected vessels were separated by parenchyma. , The work of Cushing and Bailey in 1928 and Bergstrand et al. in 1936 recategorized spinal arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) as both neoplastic and vascular malformations, the latter category was further supported by the work of Wyburn-Mason in 1943 who referred largely to Virchow’s original terminology. Although these classifications were useful in pathological terms, the clinical management of spinal AVMs (SAVMs) did not advance substantially until 1971 following the work of Di Chiro and colleagues, who described the first classification of spinal arteriovenous (AV) shunts based on angiography, and Kendall and Logue’s 1977 study using selective angiography to initially demonstrate the fistulous component of AVMs as their true pathological component. ,

Broadly speaking, AVMs can be grouped into two broad categories: nidal (AVMs) or fistular (arteriovenous fistulae [AVFs]). Nidal types are distinguished by a network of abnormal connections between arterial feeders and draining veins, and in contrast, fistulae are a direct artery-to-venous connection. In the discussion of SAVMs specifically, a series of multicenter collaborations between the 1960s and 1980s produced the first of several overarching classification systems, initially consisting of three types of lesions: type I/dural AVFs (angioma racemosum), type II/glomus AVMs, and type III/juvenile AVMs. This classification was expanded upon with the addition of type IV/intradural perimedullary (direct) AVFs by Heros et al. in 1986. Alternatively, a system proposed in 2002 by Spetzler et al. distinguished four broad categories of spinal vascular malformations: spinal AVFs and AVMs (including conus medullaris AVMs), neoplastic vascular lesions, and spinal aneurysms. , , ,

Embryology and Vascular Anatomy

Blood supply to the fetal spinal cord develops in four stages . In the first several weeks of development, 31 somites are formed in a craniocaudal direction, adjacent to the notochord/developing neural tube. Formation of these structures is induced by the adjacent mesoderm and notochord. The first, or primitive segmental, stage is marked by each somite level receiving two segmental arteries growing dorsally from the paired dorsal aortae. These segmental vessels divide into dorsal and ventral branches, the latter forming a capillary network on the ventrolateral surface of the neural tube and developing further into paired ventral arterial tracts, which eventually fuse to become the anterior spinal axis during the third stage of development. Dorsal longitudinal tracts develop secondarily alongside intrinsic blood supply to the cord (sulcal arteries that branch from ventral longitudinal axes). The second, or initial, stage, thought to be key for the development of dorsal anastomoses forming the pair of future posterior spinal arteries (PSAs), and thus the likely stage of genesis for most SAVMs, occurs from weeks 3 to 6 of fetal development. During this stage, the formation of venous networks on the ventral and dorsal aspects of the spinal cord are formed as well, eventually expanding to form an interconnected capillary network. The third, or transitional, stage occurs between week 6 and month 4 of development, wherein we see the formation of the adult pattern of vascular supply take place, typically around week 10. The primitive longitudinal tracts of the ventral surface fuse in this stage, and we see a reduction of the medullary branches of segmental arteries augmenting the now largely formed anterior spinal axis, the eventual anterior spinal artery (ASA). Those dorsal and ventral medullary branches (sometimes referred to as segmental medullary arteries) still in place provide supportive flow to the main longitudinal arteries of the spinal cord. Following the transitional stage after month 4, the fourth and final, or terminal, stage is marked by maturation of the formed vessels and an increased tortuosity of vasculature. Of those discussed, the second stage is thought to be key to formation of vascular malformations, as maldevelopment in this stage can lead to persistence of primitive capillary anastomoses, AVFs and thin-walled, tortuous vessels, all potentially key pathological contributors.

The blood supply for the fully formed adult spinal cord consists of three main arteries––the previously discussed paired PSAs and singular ASA. The PSAs run the length of the spinal cord, branching off of either the posterior inferior cerebellar artery or the vertebral artery to supply its dorsal third. The ASA is the main source of blood supply to the spinal cord, supplying its anterior/ventral two-thirds. The ASA is formed from a fusion of branches from each of the bilateral vertebral arteries at the level of the foramen magnum and descending along the ventral aspect of the spinal cord, overlying the anterior longitudinal fissure. The ASA/PSAs narrow caudally and are fed by additional connecting arteries, medullary branches of segmental arteries. At the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels there are segmental spinal arteries branching posteriorly from the intercostal arteries, lumbar or iliolumbar arteries, common iliac arteries, or lateral sacral arteries. Each segmental artery proceeds to pass through the intervertebral foramen as a spinal branch, dividing into dural and radicular arteries, and at some levels medullary branches, all after penetration of the outer dural layer covering the nerve roots of the foramina. The dural arteries supply the dura, the radicular arteries supply the anterior and posterior nerve roots, and, at levels where present, the medullary arteries follow nerve roots inside the dura to anastomose with the ASA or one of the PSAs. Because of the potential ischemia induced with the partial involution of a number of medullary branches, which is a particular risk in the thoracolumbar region, there is a great radicular artery of Adamkiewicz, or arteria radicularis magna, a key blood supply structure typically observed branching from the left side of the descending aorta, at a variable vertebral level between T5–L3. The venous drainage of the spinal cord generally follows that of the arterial pattern, but most anatomic specimens demonstrate a single anterior and single posterior median spinal vein, with both connected by multiple circumferential veins following the curvature of the cord, combining to form the coronal venous plexus on the cord surface, which proceeds to drain out via the medullary veins. These leave the dural sheath to join the epidural venous plexus or internal vertebral venous plexus within the extradural adipose tissue, also known Batson’s channels, and draining posteriorly via basivertebral veins to the external vertebral venous plexus (anterior and posterior), draining out via the deep cervical vessels, the azygous system, and the lumbar veins.

Imaging Techniques

The management of SAVMs has progressed substantially in the last century. One of several keys to this progress has been the enhancement of imaging techniques, which has allowed surgeons to transition from prior high-risk exploratory laminectomy to a carefully planned approach. Since its first reported use in studying SAVMs in 1967, spinal angiography has been considered the crucial component of preprocedural planning, but the use of less invasive imaging techniques to provide initial diagnosis, visualize adjacent neurological structures, and guide subsequent steps have been a point of some debate. ,

Myelography, or x-ray studies with injected contrast agents, first allowed the static visualization of tortuous vessels as flow voids in the subarachnoid space. Subsequently this technique was combined with computed tomography (CT) scanning, referred to as a CT myelogram, which shows 100% sensitivity, allowing an enhanced visualization of the spinal cord’s margins. The MRI followed soon after, and has all but replaced myelography in SAVM assessment, given its status as a relatively noninvasive alternative with superior soft tissue contrast, with the exception of patients unable to undergo an MRI. MRI studies use T1-weight imaging and T2-weighted imaging sequences to evaluate for suspected myelopathy to potentially show key features of underlying SAVM. The most classically described findings on initial MRI include evidence of underlying edema/vascular congestion presenting as a hyperintense signal on T2-weighted imaging (or mixed hypo/hyperintense signal on T1-weighted imaging), and of potential vessel dilation appearing as flow voids, , , with a 2012 study showing that the standard T2-weighted imaging MRI has 100% sensitivity in showing lesions, also ruling out multiple other potential pathologies with relatively high sensitivity. Whereas clinical diagnosis of SAVMs at this point rests mainly on MRI, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) still is necessary.

In localization and identification of specific feeding arteries, magnetic resonance angiography can be helpful and avoid superfluous injections of all possible feeders; however, given the comparatively large field of view, there is poor spatial resolution. CT angiography has also been used for procedures with relatively high sensitivity. In the event the arterialized veins are too small to visualize, contrast enhancement may additionally play a pivotal role at diagnosis. With contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, the fistulous connection can be traced by following the small size and relatively slow flow structure of feeding intercostal or radiculomeningeal artery to the fistula itself. Also used is time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (four-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography [4D MRA]), which in one study showed higher specificity in identifying the location of the arterial feeder to within one vertebral level in 81.8% of patients. Additionally, 4D MRA can follow the first pass of contrast through the vasculature to also show flow dynamics over time, a key addition in the event of arteriovenous shunting, retrograde flow, or delayed vessel enhancement. , However, these sequences are to be considered a supplement to guide diagnostic DSA, rather than a replacement for DSA itself. In the case of MRA, should the examination suggest the level of malformation, spinal conventional angiography may then include at least injection of the segmental arteries, on both sides, one level above and below the suggested level.

DSA has long been considered the gold standard of imaging when performed under optimal technical conditions, particularly in SAVM classification and diagnosis. Occasionally DSA can be performed with an aortogram, which has proved helpful in the setting of an atherosclerotic or dilated aorta where segmental artery catheterization may be difficult. In some cases feeding arteries and local lesion angioarchitecture may be difficult to appreciate, in which case cerebral angiography may also be indicated. , There is some evidence that for some complex cases, such as conus medullaris lesions, the use of three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography is also useful in differentiating intramedullary from perimedullary surface lesions, as well as feeding arteries. Other variations on spinal angiography have been studied and shown to be effective, such as three-dimensional rotational subtraction angiography, fusion techniques combining multiple three-dimensional angiographic scans to improve capture of detail, and a time-resolved method, four-dimensional DSA, illustrates contrast in- and outflow with time, among others, but none have yet supplanted DSA as the primary diagnostic modality in SAVM treatment.

Extradural Arteriovenous Fistulas

A spinal extradural arteriovenous fistula (SEDAVF) is a rare and unique spinal arteriovenous lesion, defined as a direct connection between one or more arteries, usually the dorsal somatic branch, to the extradural venous plexus within the spinal canal and/or intervertebral foramen ( Fig. 53.1A ). The bone structure adjacent to the fistula may be involved. SEDAVFs have also been described as “epidural,” “paravertebral,” or “osteodural” AVFs, as well as spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAFs) with epidural venous drainage. SEDAVFs are more likely to have bilateral segmental artery supply than their dural counterparts. They may or may not have secondary retrograde intradural venous drainage. , , ,

Fig. 53.1, Spinal angiogram (anterior-posterior views). A, Left vertebral artery fed extradural arteriovenous (AV) fistula into the left C7 foramen. B, Type I dural arteriovenous fistula fed from the left T8 spinal artery with superior and inferior drainage. C, Type II glomus arteriovenous malformation (AVM) located at T1 fed in this injection from the right thyrocervical trunk. D, Type III juvenile AVM located at T11. E, Type IV perimedullary dural AV fistula fed from the artery of Adamkiewicz off of the left T12 radicular branch.

Demographics

Some 70% to 80% of SEDAVFs occur in the lumbar spine, followed by the sacrum. , Of these lumbar fistulas, 90% can be found behind the posterior vertebral body in the extradural space. The lumbar spine’s ventral epidural space is large with a high vascular network, providing the milieu for SEDAVF to form. , Extradural and upper thoracic AVFs are more lateral because of the presence of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the ventral epidural space.

Three subtypes of SEDAVFs have been classified based on their pattern of venous drainage: intradural/perimedullary, paravertebral, or combined. Type A SEDAVFs have both epidural and intradural venous plexus drainage. Venous reflux can occur with intradural venous drainage as a result of flow restriction within the dura mater, resulting in venous congestion with secondary myelopathy. Type B SEDAVFs lack intradural venous drainage. Symptoms often arise from mass effect of the extradural venous plexus causing a compressive effect on the cord or nerve roots. Extracranial vertebral–vertebral AVFs (VVAVFs) of the cervical spine may be considered a rare subtype of SEDAVF. This high-flow fistula shunts flow from the vertebral artery or branch to an adjacent vertebral vein, occasionally with retrograde vertebral vein drainage to the epidural venous plexus. However, VVAVFs most commonly drain into the paravertebral venous plexus. Type A SEDAVFs have a male predilection (2.3:1) and most commonly present in the sixth decade of life. They are most often found in the lumbar and thoracolumbar regions. Conversely, type B SEDAVFs typically present much younger, in the third decade of life, and more commonly occur in the cervical and thoracic spine. Women are more likely to have cervical SEDAVFs. , , Progressive myelopathy is the most common symptom of SADAVF. Symptoms often begin with leg dysesthesias and leg weakness following exertion, which can progress to paraplegia and bowel or bladder dysfunction. The mechanism of myelopathy may be caused by venous hypertension, mass effect with compression, or vascular steal phenomenon. , , Epidural fistulas rarely present with hemorrhage, although epidural hematomas and subarachnoid hemorrhage have been reported, typically with upper cervical lesions. , ,

SEDAVFs can be commonly misdiagnosed as another type of arteriovenous lesion or another entity altogether. In Saladino’s review of spinal dural fistulas, median symptom onset to correct diagnosis was 11 months. Some 25% of the patients with extradural fistulas underwent spinal surgery before ultimately being diagnosed with SEDAVF. Common misdiagnoses included transverse myelitis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, or spinal stenosis. With increasing awareness and advances in imaging, patients are being diagnosed more quickly.

Pathogenesis

The exact etiology of extradural fistulas is not clear. Although most cases of SEDAVFs are considered idiopathic, de novo extradural fistulas have been reported following lumbar spine surgery and trauma. , , , Two single-center studies reported a 10% incidence of patients with a history of spine surgery before symptom onset and diagnosis of same-level extradural fistula. , Similar to acquired cranial DAFs, it has been theorized that SEDAVFs are formed either by epidural artery injury with subsequent fistulization or a spine surgery that alters epidural venous drainage causing venous thrombosis, subsequent aberrant recanalization, and ultimately an extradural fistula. , Procoaguable conditions have not been associated with the formation of SEDAVFs. Extracranial vertebral–vertebral fistulae are more commonly associated with trauma, but connective tissue disorders, including fibromuscular dysplasia, neurofibromatosis type 1, Marfan syndrome, and Ehlers–Danlos syndrome have been linked.

Management

Treatment of SEDAVFs can be endovascular, open surgical, or both. The goal of treatment is to obliterate the fistulous connection in the epidural space, occlude the draining vein, reduce venous reflux, and relieve mass effect from the epidural venous pouch when applicable. Cord edema or compression from a SEDAVF can improve after fistula resolution.

SEDAVFs are most often treated via endovascular approaches. , The dorsal somatic branch, the most common arterial feeder of SEDAVFs, is generally accessible via catheter angiography. Its straight path allows the interventionalist to readily access the fistula. Liquid embolic agents such as Onyx or n-Butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) glue are used to embolize the fistulous connection. No superiority studies between these two agents for SEDAVF treatment have been reported. Extradural fistulas with large pouches and multiple feeders, or fistulas with difficult arterial anatomy may benefit from a combined arterial/venous or transvenous approach. Transvenous embolization is more successful in SEDAVFs with multiple arterial feeders. , ,

Surgery is less commonly used to treat SEDAVFs. As most venous pouches are located on the ventral epidural space, surgery can raise the risk for significant bleeding. Patients with endovascular treatment failure, unsafe anatomy for embolization, large venous pouches with cord compression and mass effect, and fistulas where the ASA or PSA arises from the dominant arterial feeder should be considered for microsurgical treatment. , Asymptomatic SEDAVFs can be managed conservatively.

Outcomes

A recent metaanalysis by Byun reviewing treated SEDAVFs reported 83.5% obliteration with endovascular treatment and 84.3% cure via microsurgical treatment, without statistical significance between groups. Retreatment was required in 8.6% of the endovascular group and 13.6% of the surgical group, but in 45.5% in the combined group. A complication rate of 6% was reported, all in the endovascular group. These complications included catheter-related dissection, spinal cord infarction, vertebral body infarction, and radiation dermatitis. Symptom improvement occurs for most patients following treatment, particularly with early diagnosis and treatment. Clinical symptoms improved in 70% of treated patients in the metaanalysis. Improvements in disability, motor function, and sensory function occur more frequently than improvements in bowel or bladder disturbance.

Recurrence can occur in SEDAVFs because of incomplete treatment of the fistulous connection in the epidural space. The intradural draining vein, if still filling, can recruit radiculomedullary venous drainage at another spine level. , Byun reported retreatment in 13% of all SEDAVFs in their analysis, perhaps attributed to incomplete occlusion of the fistulous pouch with secondary de novo arterial recruitment. MRI can be helpful in following patients after treatment. Cord hyperintensity on T2WI should improve after fistula treatment. Progression in clinical symptoms or continued or progressive MRI changes should warrant follow-up angiography to evaluate for remnant or recurrent fistula.

Type 1 Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas

Demographics

Spinal type I DAFs are the most common spinal vascular malformations, comprising 80% to 85% of all vascular malformations (see Fig. 53.1B ). These fistulas are found more often in males than females (77%–90% male and 10%–23% female), with the average age of diagnosis in the sixth and seventh decades of life (approximately 60 years old). DAFs are more common in the thoracolumbar region, and initial symptoms before diagnosis include pain (back pain or radicular pain), leg weakness in one-third of patients, impaired sensation or paresthesia in one-third, and bladder dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, and impotence as an initial symptom in only 10%. At the time of diagnosis, leg weakness was present in 95%, bladder dysfunction in 93%, and diminished sensation in 87%. From the time of symptom onset to 3 years, based on natural history, 50% of patients are disabled. Aminoff and Logue developed a functional grading scale that is still used in many evaluations ( Table 53.1 ). Symptoms in DAFs have been also found to be exacerbated by exercise and upright positioning, which may be caused by the increased venous hydrostatic pressure when standing. Dural AV fistulas are unlikely to present with hemorrhage. Typical diagnosis occurs 20 months after symptom onset given the ubiquity of symptoms among the range of spinal cord pathologies; misdiagnosis occurred in 81.3% of patients, and 19% underwent invasive treatment before diagnosis in one retrospective study.

Table 53.1
Functional Status Determined by the Modified Aminoff–Logue Grading Scheme
From Aminoff MJ, Logue V. The prognosis of patients with spinal vascular malformations. Brain. 1974;97(1):211-218.
Grade
Gait
1 Leg weakness, abnormal gait or stance, no restriction of activity
2 Restricted activity
3 Requiring one stick or crutch for walking
4 Requiring two sticks, crutches, or walker for ambulation
5 Confined to wheelchair
Micturition
0 Normal
1 Hesitancy, frequency, urgency
2 Occasional urinary incontinence or retention
3 Total incontinence or persistent retention

Pathophysiology

The predominant thought regarding the cause of neurological decline in DAFs is that the abnormal connection of a high-flow vessel to the venous drainage system results in venous hypertension because of pressurization. This causes venous congestion in the coronal venous plexus and backs up flow into the spinal cord, resulting in decreased perfusion pressure, edema formation, and eventual ischemia. Anatomically, most often a single radiculomedullary artery enters the spine dorsolaterally at the nerve root sleeve, and the draining vein from the fistula often involves a bridging vein to the dura and, less commonly, the radiculomedullary vein. Fistulas can be supplied by multiple branches over several levels and can be further characterized by the number of contributing levels. Dural AV fistulas are thought to be acquired over time rather than congenital.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here