Thoracoscopic Corpectomy and Reconstruction


Summary of Key Points

  • Thoracoscopic access to the anterior thoracic spine should be considered as a minimally invasive alternative to traditional open and mini-open procedures.

  • Thoracoscopy can be used along the entire thoracic spine (T1 to T12) and can be extended via transdiaphragmatic incision to the upper third of L2 in the retroperitoneal space. However, the chest cavity gets smaller at the cranial end, which can limit the access for extensive thoracoscopic procedures (e.g., discectomy, corpectomy).

  • Single-lung ventilation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube is crucial for thoracoscopy.

  • Indications for thoracoscopic corpectomy include the following:

    • 1.

      Anterior reconstruction of unstable fractures of the thoracic spine and thoracolumbar junction

    • 2.

      Spinal canal decompression for traumatic and degenerative narrowing of the spinal canal

    • 3.

      Disc-ligament instability

    • 4.

      Posttraumatic deformity of healed fractures with or without instability

    • 5.

      Preparation and release of the anterior column for deformity surgery

    • 6.

      Protruded disc removal in degenerative disc disease of the thoracic spine

    • 7.

      Vertebral body resection of metastatic spinal tumors

Thoracoscopic spine surgery, also known as endoscopic-assisted or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, is a minimally invasive closed endoscopic approach to the anterior thoracolumbar spine for decompression and stabilization. It offers an alternative to open thoracotomy for thoracolumbar vertebral body resection from T5‒L1, anterior spinal cord decompression, and spinal reconstruction with interbody and anterolateral plate instrumentation for restoration of biomechanical stability and alignment.

Spinal instability caused by trauma or destructive disease has historically been treated via a dorsal approach. Purely dorsal techniques, however, often fail to adequately address ventrally located pathology. Dorsal decompression with thoracic laminectomy for ventral epidural masses has been associated with increased risk of injury to the spinal cord. Anterior spinal canal decompression through dorsal and even dorsolateral approaches can be challenging and ineffective. , , Furthermore, posterior instrumentation alone may not sufficiently stabilize a significantly disrupted ventral loadbearing spinal column. ,

To more effectively and directly decompress and stabilize the ventral spine, thoracotomy and thoracoabdominal techniques were developed. , Although these approaches have demonstrated improved outcomes and are an acceptable treatment modality for thoracolumbar disease, the high access morbidity of these open procedures often results in postthoracotomy pain syndromes, postoperative pneumothorax or pleural effusion, shoulder dysfunction, abdominal wall relaxation, and significant scarring of the chest wall.

Spine surgeons have more recently adapted the minimally invasive thoracoscopic techniques that have been applied by thoracic surgeons for many years. Thoracoscopic spine surgery was first used in spine surgery for the treatment of thoracic disc herniations and sympathectomy for hyperhidrosis. , With the advancement of thoracoscopic video technology, instrumentation, and instrument systems, thoracoscopic spine surgery has improved significantly, and its use has been expanded to include the treatment of most thoracolumbar disorders that require corpectomy, such as thoracolumbar spine fractures, metastatic spine tumors and select degenerative disease, and deformity cases. ,

Specialized tools for endoscopic spine surgery are used to access the thoracic cavity through small chest incisions, and the surgery is performed under two-dimensional video guidance. Minimizing chest wall dissection and retraction through the use of small thoracoscopic incisions has significantly improved outcomes and reduced postoperative morbidity without compromising long-term successful fusion rates. , The minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach can now be safely and effectively performed to treat disease that had previously required an open thoracotomy.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Several advantages are offered by the minimally invasive thoracoscopic approach over an open thoracotomy. Multiple vertebral levels and the ventral spinal canal can be visualized and treated, without increasing surgical exposure, when access ports are properly placed. The surgical field can be imaged with excellent resolution, using modern high-definition endoscopic technology. The small intercostal incisions negate the need for rib resection and retraction, unlike open thoracotomy approaches, which necessitate large incisions, extensive dissection of intercostal muscles, rib resection, and retraction of the chest wall. The thoracoscopic approach is associated with reduced blood loss, need for blood transfusion, days of mechanical ventilation, perioperative wound pain, incidence of pulmonary and shoulder dysfunction, length of hospital stay, and days to rehabilitation. ,

For most spine surgeons, the largest obstacle to using the thoracoscopic approach is unfamiliarity with the technique and high technical demand. The operation is performed distant from the surgical site in two dimensions, based solely on thoracoscopic image guidance, which requires most spine surgeons to acquire a new set of skills. Before operating on a patient, the surgeon must gain familiarity with the new technique in practical and didactic training sessions. The surgeon and operating room staff must overcome a steep learning curve while gaining familiarity with the approach, and this can initially increase operative times by several hours. Anesthesia monitoring and double-lumen ventilation may also increase operative times. Conversion to an open thoracotomy may be required with difficult cases or when intraoperative complications cannot be resolved with the thoracoscopic technique. Finally, extensive intrathoracic disease, whether pulmonary or spinal, may be difficult to address with the thoracoscopic approach and may require open minithoracotomy.

Indications and Contraindications

The thoracoscopic approach for corpectomy is best suited to patients with thoracolumbar disease limited to one vertebral body between T5 and L1. The most common indication for thoracoscopic spine surgery is in the setting of trauma. Among patients with traumatic spinal injury, ventral spinal reconstruction for biomechanical instability is the most common surgical indication. Traumatic spinal instability may be secondary to fracture, injury to the intervertebral discs, or significant ligamentous disruption. The mainstay of treatment for thoracolumbar fractures is rigid fixation with transpedicular screw and rod constructs. The decision to add anterior column reconstruction is based on the loadbearing capacity of the injured spinal segment. The load-sharing classification system developed by McCormack and colleagues established a correlation between failure of posterior short segment fixation and the characteristics of the most significantly injured vertebrae. Fractures with a high degree of vertebral body comminution, fragment apposition, and postoperative deformity correction were found to be at high risk for posterior instrumentation failure. Thoracoscopic surgery for reconstruction of the anterior loadbearing elements is indicated in these patients. Although patients with neurological deficits from fracture intrusion into the spinal canal comprise a minor subgroup of patients with traumatic spine injury, they are also indicated for spinal canal decompression and stabilization.

For metastatic spine disease, thoracolumbar surgery is indicated for treatment of spinal instability, radiation treatment failures, anterior spinal cord compression secondary to epidural tumor causing neural compression, and pain intractable to conservative measures, or to obtain a histological diagnosis. , The thoracoscopic approach is useful for minimally invasive resection of vertebral body metastasis with or without ventral spinal canal involvement and for anterior column reconstruction with interbody placement and ventrolateral instrumentation. ,

The thoracoscopic approach is contraindicated in patients unable to tolerate single-lung ventilation because of severe cardiopulmonary disease, such as acute posttraumatic lung failure, significant pulmonary contusions, advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, or hemodynamic instability. This approach is also contraindicated in patients with significant medical diseases, disturbances in hemostasis, or terminal illnesses precluding surgical treatment. The surgery may be technically challenging in patients with a history of trauma, prior surgery, or infection, because of the development of dense pleural adhesions. In cases with substantial posterior column disruption or involvement, stand-alone anterior surgery may be insufficient to achieve spinal stability, and supplemental posterior fixation should be considered.

Preoperative Assessment and Planning

Radiographic and Diagnostic Evaluation

As with other spine surgeries, careful preoperative review and understanding of the radiographic studies are essential to identify the most appropriate treatment method and to plan the surgery. The presence or extent of vertebral body disease and bony destruction, instability of the loadbearing spinal column, spinal cord compression and canal stenosis, and anatomic malalignment are noted for surgical planning. Plain radiography can be used as an initial evaluation to localize the levels of involvement; however, computed tomography (CT) must be obtained to further assess the anatomy and involvement of the osseous spine, which is important for precise surgical planning of the dimensions of the reconstruction. The spinal cord and neural elements, intervertebral discs, epidural contents, paraspinous anatomy, and soft tissues, including abnormalities such as tumors, are evaluated primarily with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The detail and orthogonal views displayed with CT and MRI allow the best assessment for local anatomy and disease morphology. When necessary, other imaging modalities such as angiography for vascular spinal tumors may be used to obtain further information of the disease process.

The preoperative evaluation for thoracoscopic surgery also includes assessing the patient’s ability to tolerate surgery under general anesthesia with single-lung ventilation. The patient’s overall medical condition, including cardiovascular and hemodynamic stability, is assessed, and laboratory studies, including a complete blood count and coagulation panel, are reviewed. The patient’s pulmonary status is also thoroughly assessed preoperatively, which may require evaluation by a pulmonologist, anesthesiologist, or qualified internist. An evaluation by or discussion with a cardiothoracic surgeon may also be warranted in cases of pulmonary disease, previous lung injury, or infection to decide whether the patient is suited for thoracoscopic surgery or open thoracotomy.

Planning of Approach

The patient’s imaging studies are examined in detail to develop a thorough understanding of the individual patient anatomy, particularly the relative locations of the chest wall and thorax, thoracolumbar spine and spinal cord, and mediastinal structures. The side of surgery is chosen based on disease lateralization and location with respect to the surrounding anatomy. The locations of the aorta and vena cava are noted in relation to plate placement and the lesion being treated. A left-sided approach is generally preferred at the thoracolumbar junction (T11‒L2) and for disease lateralization to the left. For lesions of the upper- to midthoracic spine (T3‒T10), a right-sided approach is typically chosen.

Planning of Resection and Reconstruction

Detailed preoperative examination of the patient’s bony anatomy is important for planning the reconstruction. The appropriate lengths of the vertebral body screws are determined by measuring the widths of the vertebrae on the preoperative images. The height of the interbody is approximated by measuring the distance between the inferior end plate of the cranial level and the superior end plate of the caudal level. The plate dimensions can also be approximated preoperatively by measuring the distance between the lower third of the cranial vertebral body and the upper third of the caudal vertebral body. The extent of pathological canal intrusion is also measured to determine the amount of bony resection needed for sufficient anterior spinal canal decompression.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here