Thoracolumbar Spine


Clinical Summary and Recommendations

Patient History
Complaints
  • A few subjective complaints appear to be useful in identifying specific spinal pathologic conditions. A report of “no pain when seated” is the answer to the single question with the best diagnostic utility for lumbar spinal stenosis (+LR [likelihood ratio] = 6.6). “Pain not relieved by lying down,” “back pain at night,” and “morning stiffness for longer than 1/2 hour” are all somewhat helpful in identifying ankylosing spondylitis (+LR = 1.51 to 1.57). Subjective complaints of weakness, numbness, tingling, and/or burning do not appear to be especially helpful, at least in identifying lumbar radiculopathy.

Physical Examination
Neurologic Screening
  • Traditional neurologic screening (sensation, reflex, and manual muscle testing) is reasonably useful in identifying lumbar radiculopathy. When tested in isolation, weakness with manual muscle testing and, even more so, reduced reflexes are suggestive of lumbar radiculopathy, especially at the L3-L4 spinal levels. Sensation testing (vibration and pinprick) alone does not seem to be especially useful. However, when changes in reflexes, muscular strength, and sensation are found in conjunction with a positive straight-leg raise test, lumbar radiculopathy is highly likely (+LR = 6.0).

  • In addition, a finding of decreased sensation (vibration and pinprick), muscle weakness, or reflex changes is modestly helpful in identifying lumbar spinal stenosis (+LR = 2.1 to 2.8).

Range-of-Motion, Strength, and Manual Assessment
  • Measuring both thoracolumbar range of motion and motor control, as well as trunk strength, has consistently been shown to be reliable, but the findings are of unknown diagnostic utility.

  • The results of studies assessing the reliability of passive intervertebral motion (PIVM) are highly variable, but generally, the reports are of poor reliability when assessing for limited or excessive movement and of moderate reliability when assessing for pain.

  • Diagnostic studies assessing PIVM suggest that abnormal segmental motion is moderately useful both in identifying radiographic hypomobility/hypermobility and in predicting the responses to certain conservative treatments. However, restricted PIVM may have little or no association with low back pain.

Special Tests
  • The centralization phenomenon (movement of symptoms from distal/lateral regions to more central regions) has been shown to be both highly reliable and decidedly useful in identifying painful lumbar discs (+LR = 6.9).

  • The straight-leg raise test, crossed straight-leg raise test, and slump test have all been shown to be moderately useful in identifying nerve root impingement and disc pathologic conditions, including bulges, herniations, and extrusions.

  • Palpation of gluteal trigger points appears to be helpful in both identifying and ruling out radicular low back pain (+LR = 8.6, –LR = .28).

  • A 2011 systematic review identified the passive lumbar extension test as a useful clinical test in identifying lumbar segmental instability (+LR = 8.8).

  • Both the Romberg test and a two-stage treadmill test have been found to be moderately useful in identifying lumbar spinal stenosis.

Interventions
  • Patients with low back pain of less than 16 days’ duration and no symptoms distal to the knees and/or patients who meet at least four out of the five criteria proposed by Flynn and colleagues should be treated with lumbosacral manipulation.

  • Patients with low back pain who meet at least three out of the five criteria proposed by Hicks should be treated with lumbar stabilization exercises.

Anatomy

Osteology

Figure 4-1, Thoracic vertebrae.

Figure 4-2, Lumbar vertebrae.

Arthrology

Joints of the Thoracic Spine

Figure 4-3, T7, T8, and T9 vertebrae, posterior view.

Figure 4-4, Sternocostal articulations, anterior view.

Figure 4-5, Costovertebral joints.

Figure 4-6, Lumbar spine.

Thoracolumbar Joints Type and Classification Closed Packed Position Capsular Pattern
Zygapophyseal joints Synovial: plane Extension Lumbar: significant limitation of side-bending bilaterally and limitations of flexion and extension
Thoracic: limitation of extension, side-bending, and rotation; less limitation of flexion
Intervertebral joints Amphiarthrodial Not applicable Not applicable

Thoracic Spine Type and Classification Closed Packed Position Capsular Pattern
Costotransverse Synovial Not reported Not reported
Costovertebral Synovial Not reported Not reported
Costochondral Synchondroses Not reported Not reported
Interchondral Synovial Not reported Not reported
Sternocostal (first joint) Amphiarthrodial Not applicable Not applicable
Sternocostal (second to seventh joints) Synovial Not reported Not reported

Ligaments

Costovertebral Ligaments

Figure 4-7, Costovertebral ligaments.

Ligaments Attachments Function
Radiate sternocostal Costal cartilage to the anterior and posterior aspects of the sternum Reinforces joint capsule
Interchondral Connect adjacent borders of articulations between costal cartilages 6 and 7, 7 and 8, and 8 and 9 Reinforces joint capsule
Radiate ligament of head of rib Lateral vertebral body to head of rib Prevents separation of rib head from vertebra
Costotransverse Posterior aspect of rib to anterior aspect of transverse process of vertebra Prevents separation of rib from transverse process
Intraarticular Crest of the rib head to intervertebral disc Divides joint into two cavities

Thoracolumbar Ligaments

Figure 4-8, Thoracolumbar ligaments.

Ligaments Attachments Function
Anterior longitudinal Extends from anterior sacrum to anterior tubercle of C1. Connects anterolateral vertebral bodies and discs Maintains stability and prevents excessive extension of spinal column
Posterior longitudinal Extends from the sacrum to C2. Runs within the vertebral canal attaching the posterior vertebral bodies Prevents excessive flexion of spinal column and posterior disc protrusion
Ligamenta flava Binds the lamina above each vertebra to the lamina below Prevents separation of the vertebral laminae
Supraspinous Connect spinous processes of C7-S1 Limits separation of spinous processes
Interspinous Connect spinous processes of C1-S1 Limits separation of spinous processes
Intertransverse Connect adjacent transverse processes of vertebrae Limits separation of transverse processes
Iliolumbar Transverse processes of L5 to posterior aspect of iliac crest Stabilizes L5 and prevents anterior shear

Muscles

Thoracolumbar Muscles: Superficial Layers

Figure 4-9, Muscles of the back, superficial layers.

Muscles Proximal Attachment Distal Attachment Nerve and Segmental Level Action
Latissimus dorsi Spinous processes of T6-T12, thoracolumbar fascia, iliac crest, inferior four ribs Intertubercular groove of humerus Thoracodorsal nerve (C6, C7, C8) Humerus extension, adduction, and internal rotation
Trapezius (middle) Superior nuchal line, occipital protuberance, nuchal ligament, spinous processes of T1-T12 Lateral clavicle, acromion, and spine of scapula Accessory nerve (CN XI) Retracts scapula
Trapezius (lower) Depresses scapula
Rhomboid major Spinous processes of T2-T5 Inferior medial border of scapula Dorsal scapular nerve (C4, C5) Retracts scapula, inferiorly rotates glenoid fossa, stabilizes scapula to thoracic wall
Rhomboid minor Spinous processes of C7-T1 and nuchal ligament Superior medial border of scapula
Serratus posterior superior Spinous processes of C7-T3, ligamentum nuchae Superior surface of ribs 2-4 Intercostal nerves 2-5 Elevates ribs
Serratus posterior inferior Spinous processes of T11-L2 Inferior surface of ribs 8-12 Ventral rami of thoracic spinal nerves 9-12 Depresses ribs
CN, Cranial nerve.

Thoracolumbar Muscles: Intermediate Layer

Figure 4-10, Muscles of the back, intermediate layer.

Muscles Proximal Attachment Distal Attachment Nerve and Segmental Level Action
Iliocostalis thoracis Iliac crest, posterior sacrum, spinous processes of sacrum and inferior lumbar vertebrae, supraspinous ligament Cervical transverse processes and superior angles of lower ribs Dorsal rami of spinal nerves Bilaterally: extend spinal column
Unilaterally: side-bend spinal column
Iliocostalis lumborum Inferior surface of ribs 4-12
Longissimus thoracis Thoracic transverse processes and superior surface of ribs
Longissimus lumborum Transverse process of lumbar vertebrae
Spinalis thoracis Upper thoracic spinous processes

Thoracolumbar Muscles: Deep Layer

Figure 4-11, Muscles of the back, deep layer.

Muscles Proximal Attachment Distal Attachment Nerve and Segmental Level Action
Rotatores Transverse processes of vertebrae Spinous process of vertebra one to two segments above origin Dorsal rami of spinal nerves Vertebral stabilization, assists with rotation and extension
Interspinalis Superior aspect of cervical and lumbar spinous processes Inferior aspect of spinous process superior to vertebrae of origin Dorsal rami of spinal nerves Extension and rotation of vertebral column
Intertransversarius Cervical and lumbar transverse processes Transverse process of adjacent vertebrae Dorsal and ventral rami of spinal nerves Bilaterally stabilizes vertebral column. Ipsilaterally side-bends vertebral column
Multifidi Sacrum, ilium, transverse processes of T1-T3, articular processes of C4-C7 Spinous process of vertebra two to four segments above origin Dorsal rami of spinal nerves Stabilizes vertebrae

Anterior Abdominal Wall

Figure 4-12, Dynamic “corset” concept of lumbar stability.

Muscles Proximal Attachment Distal Attachment Nerve and Segmental Level Action
Rectus abdominis Pubic symphysis and pubic crest Costal cartilages 5-7 and xiphoid process Ventral rami of T6-T12 Flexes trunk
Internal oblique Thoracolumbar fascia, anterior iliac crest, and lateral inguinal ligament Inferior border of ribs 10-12, linea alba, and pecten pubis Ventral rami of T6-L1 Flexes and rotates trunk
External oblique External aspects of ribs 5-12 Anterior iliac crest, linea alba, and pubic tubercle Ventral rami of T6-T12 and subcostal nerve Flexes and rotates trunk
Transversus abdominis Internal aspects of costal cartilages 7-12, thoracolumbar fascia, iliac crest, and lateral inguinal ligament Linea alba, pecten pubis, and pubic crest Ventral rami of T6-L1 Supports abdominal viscera and increases intraabdominal pressure

Fascia

Figure 4-13, Transverse abdominis. The transverse abdominis exerts a force through the thoracolumbar fascia, creating a stabilizing force through the lumbar spine.

The thoracolumbar fascia is a dense layer of connective tissue running from the thoracic region to the sacrum. It is composed of three separate and distinct layers: anterior, middle, and posterior. The middle and posterior layers blend together to form a dense fascia referred to as the lateral raphe. The posterior layer consists of two distinctly separate laminae. The superficial lamina fibers are angled downward and the deep lamina fibers are angled upward. Bergmark has reported that the thoracolumbar fascia serves three purposes: (1) to transfer forces from muscles to the spine, (2) to transfer forces between spinal segments, and (3) to transfer forces from the thoracolumbar spine to the retinaculum of the erector spinae muscles. The transverse abdominis attaches to the middle layer of the thoracolumbar fascia and exerts a force through the lateral raphe, resulting in a cephalad tension through the deep layer and a caudal tension through the superficial layer of the posterior lamina. , , The result is a stabilizing force exerted through the lumbar spine, which has been reported to provide stability and assist with controlling intersegmental motion of the lumbar spine.

Nerves

Figure 4-14, Nerves of the thoracic spine.

Nerve
Ventral Rami
Segmental Level Sensory Motor
Intercostals T1-T11 Anterior and lateral aspect of the thorax and abdomen Intercostals, serratus posterior, levator costarum, transversus thoracis
Subcostals T12 Part of external oblique
Dorsal rami T1- T12 Posterior thorax and back Splenius, iliocostalis, longissimus, spinalis, interspinales, intertransversarii, multifidi, semispinalis, rotatores
Subcostal nerve T12 Lateral hip External oblique
Iliohypogastric nerve T12, L1 Posterolateral gluteal region Internal oblique, transverse abdominis
Ilioinguinal L1 Superior medial thigh Internal oblique, transverse abdominis
Genitofemoral L1, L2 Superior anterior thigh No motor
Lateral cutaneous L2, L3 Lateral thigh No motor
Branch to iliacus L2, L3, L4 No sensory Iliacus
Femoral nerve L2, L3, L4 Thigh via cutaneous nerves Iliacus, sartorius, quadriceps femoris, articularis genu, pectineus
Obturator nerve L2, L3, L4 Medial thigh Adductor longus, adductor brevis, adductor magnus (adductor part), gracilis, obturator externus
Sciatic L4, L5, S1, S2, S3 Hip joint Knee flexors and all muscles of the lower leg and foot

Figure 4-15, Nerves of the lumbar spine.

Figure 4-16, Nerves of the lumbar spine.

Patient History

Lumbar Zygapophyseal Joint Referral Patterns

Figure 4-17, Lumbar zygapophyseal joint pain referral patterns. Zygapophyseal pain patterns of the lumbar spine as described by Fukui and colleagues. Lumbar zygapophyseal joints L1-L2, L2-L3, and L4-L5 always referred pain to the lumbar spine region. Primary referral to the gluteal region was from L5-S1 (68% of the time). Levels L2-L3, L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 occasionally referred pain to the trochanteric region (10% to 16% of the time). Primary referral to the lateral thigh, posterior thigh, and groin regions was most often from L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 (5% to 30% of the time).

Area of Pain Referral Percentage of Patients Presenting with Pain (n = 176 Patients with Low Back Pain)
Left groin 15%
Right groin 3%
Left buttock 42%
Right buttock 15%
Left thigh 38%
Right thigh 38%
Left calf 27%
Right calf 15%
Left foot 31%
Right foot 8%

Prevalence of pain referral patterns in patients with zygapophyseal joint pain syndromes as confirmed by diagnostic blocks. In a subsequent study, it was determined that in a cohort of 63 patients with chronic low back pain, the prevalence of zygapophyseal joint pain was 40%.

Thoracic Zygapophyseal Joint Referral Patterns

Figure 4-18, Zygapophyseal pain patterns of the thoracic spine.

Reliability of the Historical Examination

Historical Question and Study Quality Population Reliability
Increased pain with Sitting A random selection of 91 patients with low back pain Interexaminer κ = .49
Standing Interexaminer κ = 1.0
Walking Interexaminer κ = .56
Lying down Interexaminer κ = .41
Pain with sitting 95 patients with low back pain Interexaminer κ = .99 to 1.0
Pain with bending Interexaminer κ = .98 to .99
Increased pain with coughing/sneezing15 A random selection of 91 patients with low back pain Interexaminer κ = .64
Patient report of Foot pain Two separate groups of patients with low back pain (n 1 = 50, n 2 = 33) Interexaminer κ = .12 to .73
Leg pain Interexaminer κ = .53 to .96
Thigh pain Interexaminer κ = .39 to .78
Buttock pain Interexaminer κ = .33 to .44
Back pain Interexaminer κ = −.19 to .16
Increased pain with Sitting 53 subjects with a primary complaint of low back pain Test-retest κ = .46
Standing Test-retest κ = .70
Walking Test-retest κ = .67
Pain with bending 53 subjects with a primary complaint of low back pain Test-retest κ = .65
Pain with bending Two separate groups of patients with low back pain (n 1 = 50, n 2 = 33) Interexaminer κ = .51 to .56
Increased pain with coughing 53 subjects with a primary complaint of low back pain Test-retest κ = .75
Pain with pushing/lifting/carrying Test-retest κ = .77 to .89

Diagnostic Utility of Red Flags in Identifying Serious Pathology

Historical Question and Study Quality Patient Population Reference Standard Sens Spec +LR −LR
Age ≥ 75 669 patients >55 years of age seen in primary care for 1st episode of low back pain with or without leg pain Radiologic diagnosis of vertebral fracture .45 (.28, .62) .85 (.82, .88) 3.1 (2.0, 4.7) .60 (.50, .90)
Trauma .21 (.07, .35) .97 (.95, .98) 6.2 (2.8, 13.5) .80 (.50, 1.3)
Osteoporosis .38 (.21, .54) .88 (.86, .91) 3.2 (1.9, 5.2) .70, (.50, .90)
Back pain intensity score ≥7/10 .67 (.51, .83) .63 (.59, .67) 1.8 (1.4, 2.3) .50 (.30, .90)
Thoracic back pain .42 (.26, .59) .78 (.75, .81) 1.9 (1.3, 3.0) .70 (.50, 1.0)
≥1/5 of above features .88 (.77, .99) .42 (.38, .46) 1.5 (1.3, 1.8) .30 (.10, .70)
≥2/5 of above features .70 (.54, .85) .81 (.78, .84) 3.6 (2.8, 4.8) .40 (.20, .60)
≥3/5 of above features .30 (.15, .46) .95 (.93, .97) 5.8 (3.2, 10.8) .70 (.60, .90)
Any of the following 4 factors:

  • 1.

    Anticoagulant use

  • 2.

    Decreased sensation of physical exam

  • 3.

    Pain that is worse at night

  • 4.

    Pain that persists despite appropriate treatment

329 adult patients presenting to emergency department with nontraumatic low back pain Serious outcome as the identification of any one of the following underlying pathologies within 30 days of the initial visit: compression fracture, osteomyelitis, spinal abscess, malignancy, cauda equina syndrome, severe disc prolapse requiring surgery, any condition requiring immediate intervention (i.e., abdominal aortic aneurysm, retroperitoneal tumor, bleeding or infection that required treatment, spinal stenosis requiring surgery, or death) .91 (.71, .99) .55 (.49, .61) 2.0 (1.7, 2.4) .17 (.04, .62)

Diagnostic Utility of Patient History in Identifying Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Historical Question and Study Quality Patient Population Reference Standard Sens Spec +LR −LR
Age over 65 years 93 patients with low back pain 40 years old or older Lumbar spinal stenosis per attending physician’s impression; 88% also supported by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) .77 (.64, .90) .69 (.53, .85) 2.5 .33
Pain below knees? .56 (.41, .71) .63 (.46, .80) 1.5 .70
Pain below buttocks? .88 (.78, .98) .34 (.18, .50) 1.3 .35
No pain when seated? .46 (.30, .62) .93 (.84, 1.0) 6.6 .58
Severe lower extremity pain? .65 (.51, .79) .67 (.51, .83) 2.0 .52
Symptoms improved while seated? .52 (.37, .67) .83 (.70, .96) 3.1 .58
Worse when walking? .71 (.57, .85) .30 (.14, .46) 1.0 .97
Numbness .63 (.49, .74) .59 (.42, .76) 1.5 .63
Poor balance .70 (.56, .84) .53 (.36, .70) 1.5 .57
Do you get pain in your legs with walking that is relieved by sitting? 45 patients with low back and leg pain and self-reported limitations in walking tolerance Lumbar spinal stenosis per MRI or CT imaging .81 (.66, .96) .16 (.00, .32) .82 (.63, 1.1) 1.27
Are you able to walk better when holding onto a shopping cart? .63 (.42, .85) .67 (.40, .93) 1.9 (.80, 4.5) .55
Sitting reported as best posture with regard to symptoms .89 (.76, 1.0) .39 (.16, .61) 1.5 (.90, 2.4) .28
Walking/standing reported as worst posture with regard to symptoms .89 (.76, 1.0) .33 (.12, .55) 1.3 (.80, 2.2) .33

Diagnostic Utility of Patient History in Identifying Lumbar Radiculopathy

Historical Question and Study Quality Patient Population Reference Standard Sens Spec +LR −LR
Patient reports of: 170 patients with low back and leg symptoms Lumbosacral radiculopathy per electrodiagnostics
Weakness .70 .41 1.19 .73
Numbness .68 .34 1.03 .94
Tingling .67 .31 .97 1.06
Burning .40 .60 1.0 1.0

Diagnostic Utility of Patient History in Identifying Ankylosing Spondylitis

Figure 4-19, Ankylosing spondylitis.

Clinical Symptom and Study Quality Patient Population Reference Standard Sens Spec +LR −LR
Pain not relieved by lying down 449 randomly selected patients with low back pain The New York criteria and radiographic confirmation of ankylosing spondylitis .80 .49 1.57 .41
Back pain at night .71 .53 1.51 .55
Morning stiffness for longer than ½ hour .64 .59 1.56 .68
Pain or stiffness relieved by exercise .74 .43 1.30 .60
Age of onset 40 years or less 1.0 .07 1.07 .00

Physical Examination Tests

Neurologic Examination

Diagnostic Utility of Sensation Testing, Manual Muscle Testing, and Reflex Testing for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy

Test and Study Quality Description and Positive Findings Population Reference Standard Sens Spec +LR −LR
Sensation (vibration and pinprick) Considered abnormal when either vibration or pinprick was reduced on the side of the lesion 170 patients with low back and lower extremity symptoms Electrodiagnostic testing. Radiculopathy defined as the presence of positive sharp waves; fibrillation potentials; complex repetitive discharges; high-amplitude, long-duration motor unit potentials; reduced recruitment; or increased polyphasic motor unit potentials (of more than 30%) in two or more muscles innervated by the same nerve root level but different peripheral nerves .50 .62 1.32 .81
Weakness Gastrocnemius and soleus Weakness was defined as any grade of less than 5/5 S1 = .47 S1 = .76 1.96 .70
Extensor hallucis longus L5 = .61 L5 = .55 1.36 .71
Hip flexors L3-L4 = .70 L3-L4 = .84 4.38 .36
Quadriceps L3-L4 = .40 L3-L4 = .89 3.64 .67
Reflexes Achilles Considered abnormal when the reflex on the side of the lesion was reduced compared with the opposite side S1 = .47 S1 = .9 4.70 .59
Patellar L3-L4 = .50 L3-L4 = .93 7.14 .54
Reflexes Achilles Test is positive if reflex is absent 100 patients with lumbar disc herniation diagnosed by MRI Lumbar disc herniation diagnosed by MRI with level of herniation intraoperatively confirmed S1 = .83 S1 = .57 1.93 .30
Medial hamstring L5 = .76 L5 = .85 5.07 .28
Patellar L3-L4 = .88 L3-L4 = .86 6.29 .14
Reflexes
+
Weakness
+
Sensory
All three abnormal 170 patients with low back and lower extremity symptoms Electrodiagnostic testing. Radiculopathy defined as the presence of positive sharp waves; fibrillation potentials; complex repetitive discharges; high-amplitude, long-duration motor unit potentials; reduced recruitment; or increased polyphasic motor unit potentials (of more than 30%) in two or more muscles innervated by the same nerve root level but different peripheral nerves .12 .97 4.00 .91
Reflexes
+
Weakness
+
Sensory
+
Straight-leg raise test
All four abnormal .06 .99 6.00 .95
Any of four abnormal .87 .35 1.34 .37

Figure 4-20, Clinical features of herniated lumbar nucleus pulposus.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here