KEY POINTS

  • Cardiovascular risks depend on traditional risk factors, cancer type, and type of surgical procedures.

  • Assessment of left ventricular (LV) function should be performed preoperatively in patients who have received potentially cardiotoxic chemotherapies, including but not limited to anthracyclines and her-2 receptor antagonists.

  • Preoperative coronary ischemia assessment should be reserved for symptomatic patients or patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors, poor functional capacity, and perioperative risk of myocardial infarction (MI) or cardiac arrest above 1%.

  • Cancer survivors who undergo subsequent cardiac surgery (i.e., coronary artery bypass; valve, left ventricular assist device [LVAD] transplant) have unique considerations that need to be considered, particularly in the context of prior mediastinal radiation exposure and/or treatment with cardiotoxic chemotherapies.

There are currently more than 15.5 million cancer survivors in the United States, nearly half of whom have survived ten or more years. Patients with cancer not only commonly undergo surgery as part of their cancer treatment, but owing to increased long-term survival they also frequently undergo cardiac surgeries that may or may not be a consequence of their cancer treatment. Many unique aspects of cancer and cancer treatment confer additional cardiovascular risks to patients who undergo cardiovascular surgery. Among long-term cancer survivors, cardiovascular mortality is a common cause of death, especially among patients with lung and bladder cancers. In this chapter, we (1) review cardiovascular risk assessment in general, (2) outline individual cardiovascular concerns for a few specific cancers that are both common and frequently require surgery, and (3) address unique issues for patients who have cardiovascular complications from cancer treatment that require surgery. A risk assessment specific for each individual cancer type is beyond the scope of this chapter.

Preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment

Risk of myocardial infarction (MI)

From a perioperative cardiac complication standpoint, the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest (MICA) is of greatest concern. The risk is obviously highest in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, and revascularization should be performed in appropriate patients followed by delay in any nonemergent surgery. Timing of cancer surgery would depend on the temporal urgency of resection to decrease local and metastatic spread coupled with appropriate timing for consideration of interrupting dual antiplatelet therapy (impacted by factors such as stent type and size, lesion location, number of stents). The general guidance, based predominantly on the recommended length of dual antiplatelet therapy, is to delay surgery by 14 days after balloon angioplasty (rarely indicated), 30 days after bare metal stent and ideally 6 months after drug-eluting stent (DES), although 3 months may be acceptable if the risk of delaying surgery is greater than risk of stent thrombosis. The specific timelines are changing with updated data gathered in patients with newer DES designs. For patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), timing of noncardiac surgery should be delayed for a minimum of 4 to 6 weeks to allow for sternal healing. For patients who have had an MI in the absence of intervention, the current 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines recommend to delay noncardiac surgery until the risk of MI and mortality has exponentially decreased, commonly at least 60 days. Patients who undergo revascularization for MI fare better (50% lower risk); however, antiplatelet therapy considerations pertain to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the above outlined aspects to bypass surgery.

Patients who have a higher perioperative risk (e.g., surgery type with >1% risk of major adverse cardiac events or based on risk scores such as the revised cardiac risk index or RCRI ) with good functional capacity should proceed to surgery. If functional capacity is poor or unknown, noninvasive coronary assessment (e.g., stress echocardiography, radionuclide stress myocardial perfusion imaging, computed topography coronary angiography) should be performed if it will change perioperative management ( Fig. 6.1 ). Indeed, it is a major message of the ACC/AHA guidelines on perioperative risk assessment to consider noninvasive evaluation for coronary arterial disease only if the results would change management. In addition to the RCRI score, newer risk scores include the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Surgical Risk calculator and the NSQIP MICA risk calculator ( Table 6.1 ). ,

FIG. 6.1, Stepwise approach to perioperative cardiac assessment for CAD. Step 1: In patients scheduled for surgery with risk factors for or known CAD, determine the urgency of surgery. If an emergency, then determine the clinical risk factors that may influence perioperative management and proceed to surgery with appropriate monitoring and management strategies based on the clinical assessment. Step 2: If the surgery is urgent or elective, determine if the patient has an ACS. If yes, then refer patient for cardiology evaluation and management according to GDMT according to the UA/NSTEMI and STEMI CPGs (18,20). Step 3: If the patient has risk factors for stable CAD, then estimate the perioperative risk of MACE based on the combined clinical/surgical risk. This estimate can use the American College of Surgeons NSQIP risk calculator ( http://www.surgicalriskcalculator.com ) or incorporate the RCRI (131) with an estimation of surgical risk. For example, a patient undergoing very low-risk surgery (e.g., ophthalmologic surgery), even with multiple risk factors, would have a low risk of MACE, whereas a patient undergoing major vascular surgery with few risk factors would have an elevated risk of MACE. Step 4: If the patient has a low risk of MACE (<1%), then no further testing is needed, and the patient may proceed to surgery. Step 5: If the patient is at elevated risk of MACE, then determine functional capacity with an objective measure or scale, such as the DASI (133). If the patient has moderate, good, or excellent functional capacity (≥4 METs), then proceed to surgery without further evaluation. Step 6: If the patient has poor (<4 METs) or unknown functional capacity, then the clinician should consult with the patient and perioperative team to determine whether further testing will have an impact on patient decision making (e.g., decision to perform original surgery or willingness to undergo CABG or PCI, depending on the results of the test) or perioperative care. If yes, then pharmacologic stress testing is appropriate. In those patients with unknown functional capacity, exercise stress testing may be reasonable to perform. If the stress test is abnormal, consider coronary angiography and revascularization depending on the extent of the abnormal test. The patient can then proceed to surgery with GDMT or consider alternative strategies, such as noninvasive treatment of the indication for surgery (e.g., radiation therapy for cancer) or palliation. If the test is normal, proceed to surgery according to GDMT. Step 7: If testing will not have an impact on decision making or care, then proceed to surgery according to GDMT or consider alternative strategies, such as noninvasive treatment of the indication for surgery (e.g., radiation therapy for cancer) or palliation. ACS, Acute coronary syndrome; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CAD, coronary artery disease; CPG, clinical practice guideline; DASI, Duke Activity Status Index; GDMT, guideline-directed medical therapy; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; MET, metabolic equivalent; NB, No Benefit; NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCRI, Revised Cardiac Risk Index; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; UA/NSTEMI, unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

TABLE 6.1
Comparison of the Three Major Risk Scores
RCRI NSQIP MICA NSQIP SURGICAL RISK
Criteria
  • 1 point for each

    • a High-risk surgery

    • Hx ischemic heart disease

    • Hx CHF

    • Hx CVA

    • Preoperative trt with insulin

    • Preoperative Cr >2 mg/dL

  • Risk calculator based on following variables:

    • Type of surgery

    • Dependent functional status

    • Abnormal Cr

    • Increased age

    • American Society of Anesthesiologists Class

b 20 variable calculator based on type of surgery and various patient variables
Outcome parameters:
MI, cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, complete heart block, pulmonary edema for RCRI
for the other two: MI and cardiac death
Low risk: score of 0-1
Outcome parameters:
MI or cardiac arrest
Low risk: risk <1%
Outcome parameters:
MI, cardiac arrest, heart failure
Low risk: <1%
Pros Simple and easy to use Accuracy higher than RCRI
Large derivation and validation cohort
Highest mortality accuracy (c-statistic 0.944)
Cons Newer models perform better Requires online calculator Not externally validated
More complex
CHF, Congestive heart failure; Cr, serum creatinine; CVA, cerebrovascular accident; MICA, Myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest; NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; RCRI, Revised Cardiac Risk Index; trt, treatment.

a Defined by intraperitoneal, intrathoracic, or suprainguinal vascular surgery.

b See riskcalculator.facs.org/riskcalculator/index.jsp.

Risk of heart failure decompensation

Whereas symptomatic heart failure has the highest cardiovascular risk for patients undergoing surgery in general, asymptomatic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction also carries an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with patients without heart failure or abnormal LV function. In a large retrospective study of mostly male veterans undergoing a variety of surgical procedures, for example, 90-day mortality was 1.2%, 4.8%, and 10.1% for patients without heart failure, asymptomatic systolic dysfunction, or symptomatic heart failure, respectively. Patients with symptomatic heart failure (with preserved or reduced ejection fraction [EF]) and patients with asymptomatic LV dysfunction should be assessed by a cardiologist prior to surgery for evaluation and medical optimization with guideline-directed therapies. Assessment of LV function prior to surgery should be performed particularly in any patient who has been exposed to potentially cardiotoxic therapies including (but not limited to) anthracyclines, human epidermal growth factor receptor (her-2) antagonists, certain vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immunotherapies (see Central Illustration). While strain parameters (e.g., derived by speckle tracking echocardiography) have been shown to predict cardiotoxicity with cancer therapeutics, their value to assess surgical risks of patients with cancer has not yet been defined. Finally, biomarkers such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NT-proBNP can also help stratify the cardiovascular risk of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. A NT-BNP greater than 300 ng/L or a BNP greater than 92 mg/L is associated with a four-fold increase in the postoperative risk of death or nonfatal MI.

Risk of cerebrovascular events (CVE)

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and this risk increases with surgery. Owing in part to the increased hypercoaguable state, patients with many types of cancer are also at increased risk for CVE independent of AF. AF occurs in approximately 12.6% of patients with cancer who are undergoing lung resection and it is also common in patients with cancer undergoing colectomy or esophageal resection. Elevated perioperative NT-BNP is associated with an increased risk of AF after lung cancer resection. Although AF confers a five-fold increased risk of CVE in the general population, the risk of CVE in those with cancer with post operative AF is not well studied nor is the optimal treatment approach. No evidence supports the use of routine preoperative carotid imaging prior to surgery.

Risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE)

The risk of venous thromboembolism is markedly elevated in patients with cancer. Those undergoing surgery have two times higher rates of postoperative VTE than do patients without cancer. In addition to patient characteristics, such as advanced age, morbid obesity, and prolonged hospitalization, cancer type is a major risk factor for VTE in those patients undergoing surgery. For example, the 30-day incidence of VTE after breast cancer surgery is very low (~0.30%); however, the VTE incidence for patients undergoing esophagectomy, cystectomy, and pancreatectomy is very high (~7.3%, 4.9%, and 3.4%, respectively). Patients should have prophylaxis for VTE administered postoperatively as soon as feasible, from a postoperative bleeding perspective.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here