Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
This chapter includes an accompanying lecture presentation that has been prepared by the authors: .
The most important determinant for obtaining the best outcomes after deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is careful patient selection.
The US Food and Drug Administration–approved indications for DBS include Parkinson disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), and primary dystonia.
DBS should only be considered for patients with confirmed PD and should not be used for atypical parkinsonism.
The subthalamic nucleus and the globus pallidus interna (GPi) are the preferred DBS targets to improve motor symptoms in PD.
Patients with a diagnosis of moderate to early advanced idiopathic PD, minimal or no cognitive impairment, and a positive response to levodopa perform better after DBS.
GPi-DBS is a safe and effective treatment for primary and certain types of secondary dystonia.
The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus or the caudal zona incerta are appropriate targets for DBS in ET.
Successful deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy for movement disorders depends on a series of interrelated procedures that include target selection, precise lead placement, and proficient electrode programming. However, the first and most important step toward consistent DBS outcomes remains careful patient selection, because one retrospective study of two movement disorders centers found that more than 30% of DBS failures can generally be ascribed to an incorrect initial diagnosis or inappropriate indication for surgery.
In this chapter, we discuss the selection criteria for DBS surgery for movement disorders. We focus both on the overall selection process and on specific indications for each of the surgical interventions currently accepted or investigated for the treatment of intractable movement disorders. When available, we cite appropriate studies to support our positions; however, suitably controlled prospective studies are often lacking in this rapidly advancing field. Therefore expert clinical opinion, which is by nature subjective and often controversial, constitutes a great part of the available knowledge.
A thorough selection process should be performed routinely to ensure that only appropriate candidates are offered DBS surgery. In our practice, this includes the following: (1) neurological examination and a detailed neurological history; (2) neurosurgical evaluation; (3) neuropsychological testing and, in select candidates, psychiatric evaluation; (4) neuroimaging; and (5) medical clearance.
The preoperative evaluation for DBS normally begins with assessment by a neurologist with specific expertise in the management of movement disorders. This evaluation should be focused on establishing the correct diagnosis and ensuring that all reasonable medical therapies have been tried. Approved indications for DBS include essential tremor (ET), Parkinson disease (PD), and primary dystonia. Other forms of tremor (i.e., midbrain, cerebellar, and orthostatic), tics, and choreas (Huntington chorea and neuroacanthocytosis) have also been targeted with DBS but are considered off-label uses of the approved device. Box 106.1 summarizes movement disorders for which DBS is currently indicated.
Idiopathic Parkinson disease
Essential tremor
Primary dystonia
Generalized
Segmental
Hemidystonia
Cervical
Tardive dystonia
Myoclonus-dystonia
Pantothenate kinase–associated neurodegeneration
Huntington chorea
Choreoacanthocytosis
Tics
Cerebellar tremor (multiple sclerosis)
Midbrain tremor
Orthostatic tremor
Lesch-Nyhan syndrome
Multiple system atrophy
Progressive supranuclear palsy
Corticobasal degeneration
Vascular parkinsonism
Secondary dystonias
Once the correct diagnosis is established, the neurologist should review the medical management history to make sure that all reasonable pharmacologic therapies have been properly attempted. This can be a very controversial point because opinions vary greatly as to what constitutes the “minimal” medication therapy to be attempted before proceeding with DBS. When a patient with PD is being considered for DBS, examination both “off” and “on” medications should be performed because determination of benefit from levodopa has well-documented diagnostic implications. In addition to neurological and motor deficits, functional disability should be documented using an accepted clinical rating scale that is specific to the patient’s diagnosis. Videotaped examinations are also of great value for clinical documentation and monitoring of long-term outcome.
The value of the initial neurological visit does not end with the selection process. It also establishes a clinical baseline for postoperative comparison and provides an opportunity to educate patients and caregivers on the risks of surgery and expected outcomes. It is far more challenging to program a patient’s DBS devices and manage his or her medications postoperatively if the neurologist is unfamiliar with the patient. Unrealistic expectations on the part of patients or family members are common reasons for “DBS failures,” so it is wise to moderate expectations through consultation early in the process. Finally, DBS management represents a significant commitment of time, so it is important that the treating neurologist assess the patient’s and family’s motivation to undertake the challenge.
If the neurologist determines that the diagnosis is correct and that reasonable medical strategies have not provided acceptable benefit, the patient is referred to a functional neurosurgeon for further evaluation. During this meeting, the surgeon confirms that the patient is an appropriate surgical candidate and discusses the remainder of the preoperative process; the surgical options, including the available targets, devices, and surgical methodologies (e.g., frame versus frameless); and the risks and realistic results of DBS.
A fundamental task for the neurosurgeon is to define whether the risk-benefit ratio of the surgical procedure is acceptable to the patient. The most fearsome risk associated with the DBS procedure is the occurrence of intracerebral hemorrhage, which may cause a variety of neurological deficits, including death in the most severe cases. The risk for hemorrhage may vary from center to center, based on the experience of the surgeon, but it is never nil. In addition, there are device-related risks of system failure and infection, which can occur in up to 25% of patients even in the best centers. , Patients are also reminded that battery replacement for certain models of implanted pulse generator, requiring minor surgery, will be necessary after 2 to 5 years, depending on the electrical energy usage associated with their therapeutic stimulation. Newer devices that have recently entered the market are expected to last even longer (up to 15 years for some rechargeable models).
In addition, potential contraindications to surgery should be explored. Patients with poorly controlled hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, cardiac pacemakers, liver or kidney failure, seizure disorders, or coagulopathies may be poor candidates, although the risk-benefit ratio of DBS surgery should be assessed for each case. If the patient is a good surgical candidate and agrees, a tentative date for surgery is scheduled and the remainder of the preoperative evaluation is completed. If there is disagreement about the best surgical target or treatment modality, the patient’s case should be reviewed at a multidisciplinary conference to arrive at a consensus.
A neuropsychologist, psychiatrist, and social workers are essential members of a strong DBS program because proper cognitive assessment, psychiatric screening, and social considerations are fundamental steps in patient selection. Although fewer data are available on patients with premorbid psychiatric conditions undergoing DBS of the globus pallidus interna (GPi) or ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus, the available evidence suggests that behavioral and cognitive side effects may occur, warranting preoperative neuropsychological testing for all patients considering DBS.
The prevalence of dementia is high in patients with PD, and even early preoperative dementia is a risk factor for permanent cognitive decline after DBS. , Because no one neuropsychological assessment tool has proven to be predictive of postoperative cognitive decline, several test batteries may be used to screen surgical candidates, with the goal of excluding those with dementia or significant deficits in executive function. No consensus guidelines or “gold standards” are available, and detailed comparative data have not been published. In designing a neuropsychological battery for DBS candidates, it is important to cover the major neurocognitive domains for both patient selection and follow-up; at the same time, the battery should not be exhaustive because patients with PD fatigue easily, leading to inaccurate results. Moreover, many PD patients with severe medication-related “on-off” fluctuations can sometimes experience significant cognitive disturbance during their “off” period yet perform relatively normally during their “on” period. , , Unfortunately, neuropsychological testing is not universally performed before DBS, potentially leading to negative postsurgical outcomes.
A full psychiatric evaluation is essential for patients who pass cognitive screening but have signs of untreated depression or psychosis, including assessment for dopaminergic dysregulation syndrome, medication-induced hypomania/mania, and suicide risk.
The need for systematic neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric evaluation is less established for other DBS indications, including ET and dystonia, because dementia is not typically a feature of these conditions. On the other hand, because ET is a disorder of the aging brain, if there are concerns about a patient’s cognitive function, a neurocognitive evaluation may certainly be warranted. Dystonia patients who are DBS candidates are typically young and less prone to suffer cognitive abnormalities after surgery but may have neuropsychiatric issues surrounding their disabilities and may therefore benefit from psychiatric and social work support.
Potential surgical candidates should undergo preoperative imaging, preferably magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in order to rule out structural lesions or anatomic distortions that either may interfere with proper targeting (e.g., areas of encephalomalacia) or represent an increased risk for hemorrhage (e.g., abnormally enlarged lateral ventricles, severe brain atrophy). In addition, when the diagnosis of idiopathic PD is questioned, MRI can show abnormalities typical of multiple system atrophy (MSA) or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), parkinsonian syndromes that are not currently considered appropriate indications for DBS surgery.
Nuclear imaging studies (single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography) can occasionally be helpful in differentiating atypical parkinsonism from idiopathic PD. Although performed in the past to predict pallidotomy outcomes, the use of metabolic imaging modalities for screening patients undergoing DBS therapy is currently not part of routine DBS screening but may be used as needed to establish or rule out a diagnosis of idiopathic PD.
Medical clearance is the last screening step that is recommended before DBS surgery and normally includes standard preoperative blood tests and electrocardiography when indicated. DBS candidates should also be instructed to discontinue vitamin E, aspirin, and other medications that interfere with normal coagulation at least 2 weeks before surgery to reduce the risk for hemorrhage. In patients with mechanical heart valves, the surgeon may employ enoxaparin during this 2-week period and then discontinue these injections the night before surgery, thereby minimizing the risk of thrombotic events during the 2-week washout period.
Among the many elements involved in successful DBS surgery for PD, patient selection has proved to be the most significant factor in determining postoperative benefit. Several good outcome predictors have been established, including a diagnosis of moderate to advanced idiopathic PD, a positive response to levodopa, and an absence of cognitive deterioration. The role of other variables, such as age and concurrent non–motor-associated symptoms, is less well defined ( Table 106.1 ).
Selection Criteria | Comments |
---|---|
Diagnosis | A diagnosis of idiopathic PD should be carefully established according to available criteria because atypical parkinsonism (e.g., MSA, PSP, CBD, DLB) is generally poorly responsive to DBS. |
Disease severity | The most important factors leading to performance of DBS are marked motor fluctuations in the response to dopaminergic therapy, including levodopa-induced dyskinesia, and frequent and sudden wearing off with a prominent freezing responsive to levodopa. |
UPDRS-III scores of ≥30 are generally consistent with severe disease and may prompt consideration of DBS. | |
Disabling tremor unresponsive to levodopa may warrant DBS therapy even in the absence of severe motor fluctuations. | |
Disease duration | Disease duration of ≥5 years should be documented to avoid misdiagnosis of atypical PD. Atypical parkinsonism may initially be manifested as PD and may not show atypical features within 3–5 years after onset. |
Age at surgery | Older age is not a specific exclusion criterion. |
Age at surgery has been reported to correlate negatively with DBS outcome. | |
Cognitive and general health status should be carefully evaluated in patients ≥70 years. | |
Response to medications | A good response to levodopa is positively correlated with DBS outcome and should be assessed either historically or with a levodopa challenge test (≥30% improvement). |
Cognitive status | Worsening of cognitive status has been reported after DBS in patients with preexisting dementia. |
Absence of active psychiatric disease | Untreated psychiatric disease should be carefully addressed before considering DBS. |
Properly treated depression is not a contraindication but warrants careful postsurgical monitoring. | |
Realistic expectations | DBS does not cure PD. |
Patient education is essential to ensure adequate expectations. | |
Adequate social support | Patients with strong family or social support are better able to follow presurgical/surgical/postsurgical demands and have overall better outcomes. |
DBS therapy should be considered only for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of idiopathic PD. Although idiopathic PD has been defined by the presence of bradykinesia associated with at least one of three conditions—rigidity, resting tremor, and postural instability—the presence of postural instability may be a relative contraindication for DBS. Furthermore, the presence of postural instability early in the disease raises concerns for atypical parkinsonism. The most frequent atypical parkinsonian syndromes that can be misdiagnosed as idiopathic PD are PSP, MSA, dementia with Lewy bodies, and corticobasal degeneration. It is important to differentiate idiopathic PD from the atypical parkinsonian disorders because they tend not to respond favorably to stimulation. These disorders—including early dysautonomia, bulbar dysfunction, respiratory compromise, spasticity, ataxia, and apraxia—generally have an earlier age at onset than PD and progress more rapidly.
Patients with atypical parkinsonian syndromes should not be selected for DBS therapy. Several case reports have demonstrated the ineffectiveness of DBS for MSA using either subthalamic nucleus (STN) or GPi targets, even when the patient is responsive to levodopa. Although patients with levodopa-responsive bradykinesia, rigidity, or dystonia may show transient improvement, speech, swallowing, and gait usually deteriorate; motor fluctuations do not improve; and the levodopa dose remains unchanged. , Clinical experience with DBS for other types of atypical parkinsonism, including corticobasal degeneration and PSP, is extremely limited.
Although it is not considered a predictor of DBS outcome, the duration of parkinsonism should be taken into consideration when ruling out atypical parkinsonism. , Typically, PD motor disability progresses slowly, so patients with advanced symptoms less than 5 years after onset should be evaluated further for atypical parkinsonism before being considered for DBS. At the same time, DBS should not be offered too late in the disease course, when severe motor complications have resulted in marked erosion of quality of life. Currently, DBS is performed after an average PD duration of 11 to 14 years; however, the EARLYSTIM trial, which offered DBS therapy at an earlier stage of the disease (7 years after initial motor symptoms) yielded superior results as compared to best medical therapy, suggesting that DBS should be considered as a therapeutic option earlier in the course of PD, when quality of life is still high. Indeed, there is little consensus on what defines advanced, medication-refractory PD and therefore candidacy for DBS. Severe PD disability generally coincides with Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores of approximately 30 or higher (out of a maximum of 108) or a score in the 50s (out of a maximum of 132) on the Movement Disorder Society–sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS); thus although not absolutes, these would seem to be reasonable severity thresholds to prompt a consideration of DBS therapy. , , Available experience with STN-DBS or GPi-DBS has mostly been with levodopa-responsive patients having “off”-period UPDRS motor scores higher than 40 or 50. An ideal PD surgical candidate should be severely disabled when off levodopa, but doing well, despite having dyskinesias while on medications.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here