Management of endocrine disorders in the surgical intensive care unit


The neuroendocrine axis

The endocrine system is a complex system allowing communication between the nervous system and the end organs. It consists of the neuroendocrine axis (hypothalamus, pituitary, and glands), all of which influence the response to stress and critical illness. Critically ill patients have a physiologic response to their illness that results in alterations in the endocrine system. Alternatively, they may have underlying endocrine disorders that influence their response to critical illness. Unrecognized endocrine pathology may create management difficulties and increase morbidity. Abnormalities may occur at any location within the endocrine system. Primary endocrinopathy is a result of peripheral endocrine gland dysfunction; secondary refers to pituitary dysfunction; and tertiary refers to the hypothalamus.

In addition to physiologic signals, stress or trauma can activate the neuroendocrine axis. This activation results in the release of hormones (messengers), which may be peptides or steroids that bind to receptors and initiate further downstream actions ( Fig. 1 ). This action, along with complex feedback loops, attempts to maintain homeostasis. Any disease or dysregulation can result in physiologic derangements. This chapter addresses abnormalities in the endocrine system that affect the course of critically ill patients.

FIGURE 1, Neuroendocrine axis. E, Epinephrine; NE, norepinephrine.

Central nervous system problems

Brain injuries may impact the regulation and production of hormones originating from the hypothalamus or pituitary. Traumatic brain injury, neurologic surgery, mass lesions, infiltrative diseases, vascular or hypoxic injuries, and cerebral infections may all cause dysregulation of hypothalamic or pituitary hormones. Cerebral edema or increased intracranial pressure is thought to restrict the blood flow to the hypothalamic-pituitary area. Frequently encountered abnormalities are diabetes insipidus (DI), syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), and cerebral salt wasting, all of which cause abnormalities of sodium and water balance. Evaluation of volume status, urine and serum sodium, and osmolality are required to determine which syndrome is present in order to provide appropriate treatment ( Table 1 ).

TABLE 1
Comparison of Central Causes of Sodium and Water Abnormalities
Feature Diabetes Insipidus Cerebral Salt Wasting SIADH
Serum sodium
Serum osmolality (mOsm/kg) >290 <280 <280
Urine osmolality (mOsm/kg) <300 >100 >100
Urinary sodium (mEq/L) Variable >20 >20
Volume depletion Yes Yes No
Treatment DDAVP, water replacement Normal saline Fluid restriction
DDAVP, 1-Deamino-8- d -arginine vasopressin; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone.

Diabetes insipidus

Diabetes insipidus can be categorized as central (lack of hormone) or nephrogenic (lack of response to hormone). Central DI is caused by depletion or absence of arginine vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone (ADH)), which results in polyuria. If thirst is impaired, this may result in water diuresis of more than 3 L/day, dehydration, and hypernatremia. In the neurosurgical patient population the incidence of DI is 3.7% with a mortality rate up to 70%. DI commonly occurs in association with severe brain injury and herniation, and the diagnosis is suspected when urine output exceeds 200 mL/hr for 2 consecutive hours. A dramatic rise in serum sodium occurs in the ICU) patient population unless fluids are aggressively replaced. The urine is dilute with urine osmolality of less than 300 mOsm/kg and urine specific gravity less than 1.005 g/mL. Conversely, urine osmolality greater than 800 mOsm/kg excludes DI. Fluid and vasopressin replacement are the mainstays of treatment. Typical doses of DDAVP (1-deamino-8- d -arginine vasopressin) include 2 to 4 μg intravenously (IV) or 10 to 60 μg intranasally. Vasopressin infusion is also an acceptable treatment modality. Frequent monitoring of electrolytes and volume status is mandatory. Repeat doses of treatment medications may be needed until the DI abates. The water deficit is calculated and slowly replaced. Caution is used when severe hypernatremia is present with only half of the water deficit replaced in 24 hours to avoid demyelination ( Table 2 ). The astute clinician must be aware of the described triphasic response where the patient may exhibit DI followed by SIADH (see later), then followed by more permanent DI.

TABLE 2
Formula for Calculating Water Deficit
Water deficit = 0.6 * × (Wt kg) × ([Na/140] − 1)
Wt kg, Weight in kilograms.

* 0.5 for females.

SIADH and cerebral salt wasting

Patients with hyponatremia must be evaluated for SIADH and cerebral salt wasting (CSW). The diagnosis is made in the hyponatremic patient that is found to be hypotonic with a urine osmolality >100 mOsm/kg. The diagnosis is further solidified if the urine sodium > 40 mmol/L. SIADH and CSW can be difficult to distinguish and are most different in that SIADH patients are often euvolemic whereas CSW patients are hypovolemic. Differentiating the two entities is critical due to their opposing treatments ( Table 1 ). The cause of SIADH is excessive release of ADH that leads to water retention and an increase in extracellular fluid volume. Volume expansion increases renal sodium excretion, producing hyponatremia. Cerebral salt wasting, also known as renal salt wasting, results from a natriuretic peptide, which results in sodium and volume depletion. Volume depletion results in ADH activation, which, in turn, contributes to the development of hyponatremia.

In both syndromes, the diagnosis begins with serum sodium less than 135 mmol/L, serum osmolality less than 280 mOsm/kg, and urine osmolality greater than 100 mOsm/kg. As stated previously, the differentiating factor is the patient’s volume status, which is normal in SIADH and depleted in cerebral salt wasting. Low effective blood volume normally causes orthostatic hypotension, tachycardia, low CVP, low urine sodium, low chloride, and fractional excretion of sodium with high blood urea nitrogen (BUN). Both disease states have low serum uric acid levels. With correction of the salt deficit, uric acid levels normalize in SIADH but not in cerebral salt wasting. Fractional excretion of urate (FE urate ) may help distinguish these two entities. Correction of hyponatremia in SIADH will normalized the FE urate (4%–11%).

Treatment of SIADH is fluid restriction (800–1000 mL/day) and occasionally hypertonic saline. Hypertonic saline is typically reserved for patients that have severe hyponatremia resulting in symptoms. Fluids administered must exceed the urine osmolality or else the hyponatremia will worsen. Hence, the use of normal saline is discouraged. Demeclocycline, phenytoin, lithium, and vaptans are used for treatment of chronic SIADH, but not in the acute setting. The treatment for cerebral salt wasting is normal saline fluid replacement to expand the extracellular fluid compartment (see Table 1 ). Misdiagnosing or confusing these two entities will result in ineffective treatment and exacerbation of hyponatremia.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here