Intraoperative Consultations During Skin Surgery


Introduction

Frozen section is rarely used for primary diagnosis in dermatopathology but is often requested for management of skin cancer. The principal treatment for most skin malignancies consists of primary excision with negative margins. The operative procedure may include use of flaps or grafts following margin clearance, depending on the size of the defect needed to clear margins. Accordingly, a false positive result may potentially lead to a larger excision that requires a more complex procedure; and a false negative result may leave tumor present underlying a flap or graft, often in a cosmetically sensitive location. Application of frozen section in skin excisions may be used for margin evaluation either in a conventional fashion or as part of Mohs micrographic surgery, the latter of which is beyond the scope of this chapter. Traditional frozen section examination of margins in dermatopathology is most commonly applied to epithelial neoplasms, typically for basal cell carcinoma and less commonly for squamous cell carcinoma excisions. Adnexal carcinomas are rarely encountered. Frozen section in diagnosis and management of melanocytic lesions is controversial and usually not indicated ( Table 5-1 ).

Table 5-1
Issues During Intraoperative Consultation
  • Evaluation of margins for excision of primary skin tumors

  • (Rarely) Primary diagnosis of larger lesions

  • Orientation and sampling strategies

  • Avoidance of diagnostic pitfalls

Indications and Contraindications for Frozen Sections

Margin assessment, most commonly for basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, is routinely requested. Depth of invasion in large squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas is an uncommon request. Staging of such carcinomas is recommended for all tumors greater than 2 cm, and although depth of invasion may change the pathologic stage, it does not in our experience alter intraoperative management. Furthermore, it cannot be reliably measured on frozen section.

Any skin excision may be subject to a request for frozen section; however, in some instances it is contraindicated and should not be performed ( Table 5-2 ). Primary diagnosis of a small (1.5 cm or less) skin lesion is of limited value in most situations and frequently leads to limited or incomplete diagnosis and a lack of sufficient lesional tissue on which to make a definitive diagnosis on permanent sections. This includes both common basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas, other less common cutaneous adnexal and Merkel cell carcinomas, and mesenchymal lesions of the skin, such as dermatofibromas, and superficial soft tissue tumors, such as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Table 5-2
Indications and Contraindications for Frozen Section of Skin
Indications for frozen section of skin
  • Margin assessment for biopsy-proven skin carcinoma

  • Primary diagnosis for large (> 1.5 cm) mass lesions of skin

  • Confirmation of lesional tissue for research collection in tumors with established diagnosis

  • Differential diagnosis of toxic epidermal necrolysis vs. staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome

Contraindications for frozen section of skin
  • Primary diagnosis of pigmented lesions

  • Margin assessment for melanoma or melanoma in situ (controversial)

Primary diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic lesions is the subject of considerable debate in the literature. Except in the very unusual scenario of large, bulky tumors at presentation, we regard frozen section diagnosis for primary diagnosis of melanocytic lesions as contraindicated, having a detrimental effect on the pathologist’s ability to render a final diagnosis and/or to assess margin status, staging and prognostic factors. Although margin assessment may be requested for melanocytic lesions, we regard this practice as controversial and potentially harmful for clinical practice, and we do not routinely perform it.

As with all body sites, sampling of tumor deposits in the skin may be requested for tumor banking and ancillary studies, with confirmation by intraoperative pathology examination requested. This is more likely to be requested in the setting of cutaneous metastases from other sites.

Rarely are debridement specimens for infectious processes subjected to requests for intraoperative consultation. However, the case can be made for frozen section in order to triage tissue for microbiologic cultures and other assays to test for specific microorganisms.

An infrequent but important indication for intraoperative examination is to confirm the presence of toxic epidermal necrolysis or distinguish it from staphylococcal skin syndrome. This indication should be considered a true “dermatopathologic emergency” requiring after-hours intraoperative evaluation if requested.

Rarely, cutaneous lymphomas or lymphoproliferative disorders secondarily involving the skin may be subjected to frozen section requests. Though we discourage this practice, a legitimate case can be made for the purpose of establishing the presence of diagnostic tissue and triaging tissue for flow cytometry and/or molecular studies.

Margin Assessment

A common use of frozen sections in dermatopathology consists of margin assessment for primary cutaneous carcinomas, usually basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma. This is a relatively straightforward concept in theory, but in practice it poses significant challenges. Particular issues encountered include choosing a sampling strategy, knowledge of the primary diagnosis, potential impairment of evaluation due to artifacts of freezing and cautery, and understanding histologic similarity of cutaneous carcinomas to normal cutaneous adnexal units. In addition, many excision specimens require orientation and inking protocols to permit identification of a specific anatomic site.

Gross Examination

In our practice we utilize one of two methods of grossing specimens for margin assessment in dermatopathology:

  • 1.

    Serially sectioning or “bread loafing” for specimens limited in size to less than 3 cm ( Figure 5-1A )

    Figure 5-1, A, “Bread-loafed” ellipse excision with perpendicular margins. B, Trapezoidal excision with en face margins.

  • 2.

    En face margins for specimens greater than 3 m and/or unusually shaped specimens ( Figure 5-1B )

If the specimen is approximately elliptical, method 1 offers the easiest route to embedding and to reorientation following frozen section examination. Microscopic examination will show epidermis, dermis, and tumor in relation to the margins. Submission of the tips may be done either in an en face or perpendicular fashion. The latter is preferred if the tumor is near the tip or the tips are large, but proper orientation of tips submitted in this manner can be challenging.

Inking protocols are often required if the specimen is oriented. We follow a standard format for approximately elliptical or ovoid specimens. One tip is designated as 12 o’clock, and the marking suture or other designator supplied by the surgeon is assigned a clock face position relative to the 12 o’clock tip. The specimen is inked blue on the sides and base from 12 to 3, green from 3 to 6 and black from 6 to 12. The specimen is then serially sectioned and submitted sequentially from 12 o'clock to 6 o’clock with no more than two sections per cassette.

When method 2 is applied, it is important with smaller specimens that the encompassing margins are submitted entirely. In general, we perform three cuts of the margin blocks, recognizing that the deeper sections are further from the true surgical margin. Since it is not possible to determine the distance of the tumor to the margin using this method, we occasionally exhaust the blocks of en face margins if they are thinly cut. If tumor is present on the initial sections with this method this is regarded as a positive margin. If no tumor is present and a full face of the blocked tissue is present for evaluation , additional sections do not technically represent a true margin ( Table 5-3 ). Exhausting the block, however, will both ensure a full face of the blocked tissue and also will help exclude tumor close to the margin, in cases for which flaps or other reconstructive surgery is to follow. Inking is not required for this protocol, although we find it useful to ink and designate the true margin for the first cut from the chuck.

Table 5-3
Sampling and Margin Orientation Strategies
Sampling
  • If primary diagnosis of carcinoma is established, no need to preserve tissue; accurate frozen section is of paramount importance

  • Negative margins can be exhaustively sectioned

  • If preservation of primary lesion is needed, sample margins only

  • Margin approach may be determined by shape/size of specimen

En face margins
  • Theoretically samples entire surface of specimen (principle of Mohs surgery)

  • Does not indicate proximity of tumor to margin (some carcinomas grow in a discontinuous fashion)

  • More likely to have a false positive as block is faced off

  • Does not provide primary tumor sampling for comparison to marginal adnexal structures

  • Ideally handled by separate specimen submissions taken in situ with exact location specified by surgeon

Vertical/cruciate margins
  • Does not sample entire margin surface

  • More likely to have a false negative

  • More likely to have representative tumor for comparison with adnexal structures

  • Gives better representation of relationship/distance between tumor and margin

The most anatomically accurate method of localizing positive margins is that of separate en face margins submitted by the surgeon. Processing is usually faster because it involves little or no inking or dissection; the strip is placed on the cryostat block and any tumor within it constitutes a positive margin. This method can be used primarily or as follow-up for positive margins identified on previous specimens during the same procedure.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here