Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Over the last few decades, heart failure (HF) has emerged as a true epidemic, with an estimated global prevalence of 38 million patients. HF affects 6.5 million American adults, with nearly 1 million new cases annually. HF can be due to multiple different etiologies, and there are numerous identifiable risk factors. HF is the most common cause of hospitalization for patients 65 years and older in high-income countries. The prevalence and incidence of HF in middle- and low-income countries is increasing, leading to rising costs and the global burden of HF.
The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation (AHA/ACCF) define HF as a “complex clinical syndrome that results from any structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood,” with a variety of symptoms, including dyspnea, edema, malaise, and decreased exercise tolerance. Cardiomyopathies are a group of diseases that affect the myocardium and frequently lead to HF, but should not be used interchangeably with the term HF. The term congestive heart failure is no longer preferred because patients may present with a variety of symptoms and not strictly volume overload.
HF can be divided into two broad categories: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This terminology supplants the terms systolic HF and diastolic HF, respectively. In the past, there have been multiple different definitions and variable left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoffs used in clinical trials and guidelines for HFrEF (≤35%, <40%, and ≤40%) and HFpEF (>40%, >45%, >50%, and ≥55%). The most recent consensus guidelines from the ACC, AHA, Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and separate guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have attempted to provide some uniformity. Both groups define HFrEF as a LVEF of ≤40% and HFpEF as a LVEF of ≥50%. Per the ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines, a LVEF of 41% to 49% is borderline HFpEF, considered similar in many respects to patients with HFpEF. Patients with previously diagnosed HFrEF who have recovered to a LVEF of >40% are categorized as improved HFpEF and represent a group that has not been well studied.
According to nomenclature from the ESC, HF with a LVEF of 40% to 49% is termed HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF). To meet the ESC definitions of the HFpEF or HFmrEF, patients must have elevated natriuretic peptide levels in addition to HF symptoms and either relevant structural heart disease or diastolic dysfunction.
HF is further classified based on either symptoms or stages ( Table 27.1 ). The frequently used New York Heart Association functional classification system divides HF into four classes based on symptoms. The ACC/AHA system has four distinct stages that incorporate risk factors, structural heart disease, and symptoms. The ACC/AHA stages were devised to identify patients at risk for HF to help guide preventative measures. To prevent progression of HF, interventions are aimed at modifying risk factors for stage A and treating structural heart disease for stage B. Once the patient becomes symptomatic and progresses to stages C and/or D, therapies are aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality.
ACC/AHA Stage | Corresponding NYHA Functional Class | Examples | Therapies |
---|---|---|---|
|
None | Hypertension, diabetes, family history of HF, cardiotoxic medication use, alcohol use | Modifying risk factors for HF |
|
I: Asymptomatic | Left ventricular hypertrophy, previous myocardial infarction, dilated left ventricle, valvular heart disease | Treating structural heart disease |
|
|
HF symptoms at rest or with exertion, patients undergoing treatment for current or previous HF symptoms | Evidence-based HF medications, diuretics |
|
IV: Symptoms at rest | Patients with frequent hospitalizations, requiring advanced HF therapies | Evidence-based HF medications, diuretics, inotropic, or mechanical support, transplantation evaluation, hospice |
There are multiple etiologies for HF, but a large proportion is secondary to ischemic heart disease. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in new HF cases has been estimated to be as high as 68%. HF secondary to CAD is frequently referred to as ischemic cardiomyopathy, which results from compromised circulation of approximately two-thirds of the coronary blood supply. The nonischemic cardiomyopathy label represents all the other diverse etiologies of HF ( Box 27.1 ).
Ischemic heart disease
Hypertensive heart disease
Valvular disease
Congenital heart disease
Dilated cardiomyopathy: idiopathic or familial
Genetic: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, left ventricular noncompaction, myopathies, ion-channel disorders
Endocrine/metabolic: obesity, diabetes, thyroid disease
Toxic: alcoholic, cocaine-induced, drug/chemotherapy, nutritional deficiencies
Tachycardia-induced
Inflammatory/infectious: HIV, Chagas disease, viral, myocarditis, rheumatological/connective tissue disease, hypersensitivity myocarditis
Infiltrative: amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis
Stress-induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy
Peripartum cardiomyopathy
The prevalence of HF in the United States is estimated at 6.5 million American adults based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2011 to 2014. Despite many advances in the care of patients with cardiovascular disease and increased awareness of risk factors, it is estimated that HF prevalence will increase by 46% from 2012 to 2030, to >8 million Americans with HF. This prediction is largely due to an aging population and the increased burden of HF in older adults because HF prevalence increases with age. For example, between 2011 and 2014, the prevalence of HF in men was 0.3%, 1.4%, 6.2%, and 14.1% at ages 20 to 39, 40 to 59, 60 to 79, and 80+ years, respectively. Prevalence rates were similar in woman, increasing from 0.5% at age 20 to 39 years to 13.4% for age 80+ years. Overall, HF prevalence is similar between the sexes, affecting 2.3% of men and 2.6% of women in 2012. Over the past decade in the United States, prevalence continues to rise despite the incidence of HF leveling off ( Fig. 27.1 ).
The prevalence of HFpEF is also increasing. Among the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry patients, 49.8% had HFrEF, 13.7% had borderline HFpEF, and 36.5% had HFpEF between 2005 and 2010. The proportion of patients hospitalized for HFpEF exacerbations increased from 33% to 39% over this time, whereas the proportion of HFrEF hospitalizations decreased.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here