Epidemiology of Heart Failure: Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction


Over the last few decades, heart failure (HF) has emerged as a true epidemic, with an estimated global prevalence of 38 million patients. HF affects 6.5 million American adults, with nearly 1 million new cases annually. HF can be due to multiple different etiologies, and there are numerous identifiable risk factors. HF is the most common cause of hospitalization for patients 65 years and older in high-income countries. The prevalence and incidence of HF in middle- and low-income countries is increasing, leading to rising costs and the global burden of HF.

Definitions

The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation (AHA/ACCF) define HF as a “complex clinical syndrome that results from any structural or functional impairment of ventricular filling or ejection of blood,” with a variety of symptoms, including dyspnea, edema, malaise, and decreased exercise tolerance. Cardiomyopathies are a group of diseases that affect the myocardium and frequently lead to HF, but should not be used interchangeably with the term HF. The term congestive heart failure is no longer preferred because patients may present with a variety of symptoms and not strictly volume overload.

HF can be divided into two broad categories: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This terminology supplants the terms systolic HF and diastolic HF, respectively. In the past, there have been multiple different definitions and variable left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) cutoffs used in clinical trials and guidelines for HFrEF (≤35%, <40%, and ≤40%) and HFpEF (>40%, >45%, >50%, and ≥55%). The most recent consensus guidelines from the ACC, AHA, Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and separate guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have attempted to provide some uniformity. Both groups define HFrEF as a LVEF of ≤40% and HFpEF as a LVEF of ≥50%. Per the ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines, a LVEF of 41% to 49% is borderline HFpEF, considered similar in many respects to patients with HFpEF. Patients with previously diagnosed HFrEF who have recovered to a LVEF of >40% are categorized as improved HFpEF and represent a group that has not been well studied.

According to nomenclature from the ESC, HF with a LVEF of 40% to 49% is termed HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF). To meet the ESC definitions of the HFpEF or HFmrEF, patients must have elevated natriuretic peptide levels in addition to HF symptoms and either relevant structural heart disease or diastolic dysfunction.

HF is further classified based on either symptoms or stages ( Table 27.1 ). The frequently used New York Heart Association functional classification system divides HF into four classes based on symptoms. The ACC/AHA system has four distinct stages that incorporate risk factors, structural heart disease, and symptoms. The ACC/AHA stages were devised to identify patients at risk for HF to help guide preventative measures. To prevent progression of HF, interventions are aimed at modifying risk factors for stage A and treating structural heart disease for stage B. Once the patient becomes symptomatic and progresses to stages C and/or D, therapies are aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality.

TABLE 27.1
Comparison of the ACC/AHA Stages of HF and the NYHA Functional Classification of HF
Data from Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2005;112(12):e154–e235; Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation . 2013;128(16):e240–e327; Dolgin M, Fox AC, Gorlin R, Levin RI, New York Heart Association. Criteria Committee. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessels. 9th ed. Boston: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 1994; and Criteria Committee, New York Heart Association. Diseases of the heart and blood vessels. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis. 6th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.; 1964:114.
ACC/AHA Stage Corresponding NYHA Functional Class Examples Therapies
  • A.

    At risk for HF, with no symptoms or evidence of structural heart disease

None Hypertension, diabetes, family history of HF, cardiotoxic medication use, alcohol use Modifying risk factors for HF
  • B.

    Structural heart disease, but no HF symptoms

I: Asymptomatic Left ventricular hypertrophy, previous myocardial infarction, dilated left ventricle, valvular heart disease Treating structural heart disease
  • C.

    Structural heart disease with previous or current HF symptoms

  • II: Symptomatic with moderate exertion

  • III: Symptomatic with minimal exertion

  • IV: Symptoms at rest

HF symptoms at rest or with exertion, patients undergoing treatment for current or previous HF symptoms Evidence-based HF medications, diuretics
  • D.

    Refractory HF, needing specialized interventions

IV: Symptoms at rest Patients with frequent hospitalizations, requiring advanced HF therapies Evidence-based HF medications, diuretics, inotropic, or mechanical support, transplantation evaluation, hospice
ACC/AHA , American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; HF , heart failure; NYHA , New York Heart Association.

Causes of Heart Failure

There are multiple etiologies for HF, but a large proportion is secondary to ischemic heart disease. The prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in new HF cases has been estimated to be as high as 68%. HF secondary to CAD is frequently referred to as ischemic cardiomyopathy, which results from compromised circulation of approximately two-thirds of the coronary blood supply. The nonischemic cardiomyopathy label represents all the other diverse etiologies of HF ( Box 27.1 ).

Box 27.1
Major Etiologies of Heart Failure

  • Ischemic heart disease

  • Hypertensive heart disease

  • Valvular disease

  • Congenital heart disease

  • Dilated cardiomyopathy: idiopathic or familial

  • Genetic: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, left ventricular noncompaction, myopathies, ion-channel disorders

  • Endocrine/metabolic: obesity, diabetes, thyroid disease

  • Toxic: alcoholic, cocaine-induced, drug/chemotherapy, nutritional deficiencies

  • Tachycardia-induced

  • Inflammatory/infectious: HIV, Chagas disease, viral, myocarditis, rheumatological/connective tissue disease, hypersensitivity myocarditis

  • Infiltrative: amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis

  • Stress-induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy

  • Peripartum cardiomyopathy

Prevalence

The prevalence of HF in the United States is estimated at 6.5 million American adults based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2011 to 2014. Despite many advances in the care of patients with cardiovascular disease and increased awareness of risk factors, it is estimated that HF prevalence will increase by 46% from 2012 to 2030, to >8 million Americans with HF. This prediction is largely due to an aging population and the increased burden of HF in older adults because HF prevalence increases with age. For example, between 2011 and 2014, the prevalence of HF in men was 0.3%, 1.4%, 6.2%, and 14.1% at ages 20 to 39, 40 to 59, 60 to 79, and 80+ years, respectively. Prevalence rates were similar in woman, increasing from 0.5% at age 20 to 39 years to 13.4% for age 80+ years. Overall, HF prevalence is similar between the sexes, affecting 2.3% of men and 2.6% of women in 2012. Over the past decade in the United States, prevalence continues to rise despite the incidence of HF leveling off ( Fig. 27.1 ).

FIG 27.1, Heart Failure Prevalence, Incidence, and Hospitalizations in the United States.

The prevalence of HFpEF is also increasing. Among the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry patients, 49.8% had HFrEF, 13.7% had borderline HFpEF, and 36.5% had HFpEF between 2005 and 2010. The proportion of patients hospitalized for HFpEF exacerbations increased from 33% to 39% over this time, whereas the proportion of HFrEF hospitalizations decreased.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here