Effect of Blood Pressure Management on Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes


The effects of aggressive blood pressure (BP) management on the risks of coronary heart disease (CHD) and other vascular outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been a matter of intense debate recently, with the results of large-scale clinical trials leading to variable interpretation. This chapter reviews the epidemiologic associations between BP and CHD in diabetes and the efficacy of BP lowering on CHD outcomes, focusing on evidence about the direct and off-target effects of different classes of BP-lowering drugs, the results of relevant clinical trials evaluating the relative merits of intensive BP management, and the potential role of new and emerging clinical interventions. Finally, these will be placed within the context of effects of BP lowering on other clinical outcomes, the role of absolute risk assessment for guiding BP management, and a global perspective of current levels of success in achieving adequate BP control in patients with T2DM.

Epidemiologic Associations Between Blood Pressure and Coronary Heart Disease in People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

On average, systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) are consistently higher among individuals with T2DM compared with those without T2DM. , Nonoptimal BP is a well-established risk factor for people with and without diabetes. In general populations, there is clear log-linear association between both SBP and DBP and CHD, evident within any adult age group. This association appears continuous across the range of BP, down to at least SBP of 115 mm Hg and DBP of 75 mm Hg, such that for adults aged 40 to 89 years, a 20-mm Hg difference in SBP is associated with an approximate 45% difference in risk of CHD. In 386,307 people with diabetes included in the Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration, a similar continuous association was observed for both Asian and non-Asian populations. Among those with diabetes, a 10-mm Hg lower level of SBP was associated with an 18% lower level of CHD, which was not statistically different from the 23% lower level of CHD observed in people without diabetes ( Fig. 14-1 ).

Figure 14-1, Association between usual systolic blood pressure (SBP) and coronary heart disease (CHD) events by diabetes status in the Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration.

Further data relating to epidemiologic associations have been derived from observational analyses of clinical trial populations. , The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) demonstrated that a higher level of average SBP within a range from below 120 mm Hg to above 160 mm Hg was associated with a greater risk of myocardial infarction (MI) of approximately 12%/10-mm Hg increment. More recently, observational subgroup analyses of the International Verapamil SR Trandolapril Study (INVEST) suggested a possible J-curve relationship with a threshold on-treatment SBP level of 125 to 130 mm Hg in diabetic patients with established stable coronary artery disease with respect to all-cause mortality. By and large, however, the epidemiologic data have formed a credible basis for the hypothesis that benefits of BP-lowering therapy might accrue to individuals with T2DM down to levels of SBP well below currently accepted thresholds for the diagnosis of hypertension.

Although these epidemiologic data provide a basis for expecting a reduction in CHD events from interventions that reduce BP in people with T2DM, the results from well-designed and appropriately powered randomized trials should inform recommendations for clinical and public health practice. Such trials have been conducted, evaluating both lifestyle interventions and drugs, and are summarized in the following sections.

Efficacy of Lifestyle Interventions on Blood Pressure Levels and Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Initial attempts at BP reduction through lifestyle modification are emphasized in guidelines for the management of hypertension worldwide in individuals with or without diabetes. These have principally focused on increasing physical activity, reducing body weight and/or adiposity, and performing dietary modification, including salt restriction. Although a number of studies have evaluated the effects of lifestyle interventions on diabetes incidence, the Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) trial examined the sustained effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention in 5145 overweight or obese adults with T2DM. Over an average of 4 years and compared with a diabetes support and education control group, intensive lifestyle intervention was associated with significant improvements for a number of vascular risk factors, including significant net reductions in SBP (− 2.33 mm Hg) and DBP (− 0.44 mm Hg). The intervention evaluated and targeted both physical activity and diet, and separate effects of individual components of the lifestyle intervention on BP cannot be estimated. Inferences about how this might translate to reductions in CHD risk currently can be based only on projections from observational studies comparing BP level or changes in BP level with clinical outcomes. Published data from Look AHEAD to date are the result of a prespecified interim comparison of effects on risk factors only, in a trial designed to evaluate the effects of the intensive lifestyle intervention on clinical outcomes after an average of 13.5 years of follow-up. (See also Chapters 5 and 12 .)

Although not restricted to people with diabetes, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) trials provide some indication of the likely effects of certain diets on BP. , Allocation to the DASH diet (rich in fruits, vegetables, and low-fat dairy foods and with reduced saturated and total fat) in 459 adults over an 8-week intervention period was associated with significant reductions in SBP and DBP of 5.5 mm Hg and 3.0 mm Hg, respectively, compared with a “typical” control diet. In the subsequent DASH-sodium trial, participants were randomly assigned different levels of sodium intake, within DASH or control diets. The effects of different levels of sodium intake in addition to the DASH diet were evaluated. Greatest benefits were observed with a low-sodium DASH diet, which compared with a control high-sodium diet, reduced SBP by 11.5 mm Hg in participants with hypertension and 7.1 mm Hg in those without a diagnosis of hypertension. With small numbers of participants, analysis in the subgroup with diabetes was not possible. A recent updated Cochrane Review of 167 studies concluded that dietary sodium reduction over at least 4 weeks resulted in significant reductions in BP, with greater effects among people with hypertension versus those considered normotensive and possibly in non-Caucasians versus Caucasians. Although there are some dissenting views, many believe the existing evidence adequately favors common recommendations for individual salt intake to be limited to less than 5 g/day, particularly in individuals with hypertension, although a Cochrane review of individual patient strategies to reduce salt intake suggest that more effective approaches to achieve such reductions are urgently required.

Efficacy and Safety of Blood Pressure–Lowering Drugs on Coronary Heart Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Multiple guidelines for pharmacologic lowering of BP in patients with T2DM exist worldwide, with some major examples summarized in Table 14-1 . Some of the evidence on which these recommendations are based is outlined here.

Table 14-1
Summary of Select Major Guideline Recommendations for the Use of BP-Lowering Drugs in Patients with T2DM
Guideline Principles for Commencing BP-Lowering Treatment Recommended Classes of BP-Lowering Drug Recommended Target BP Levels
Global: International Diabetes Federation Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes, 2012
( www.idf.org/sites/default/files/IDF-Guideline-for-Type-2-Diabetes.pdf )
Consider BP-lowering treatment if BP is consistently above 130/80 mm Hg.
All people with known cardiovascular disease should receive BP-lowering therapy unless contraindicated or not tolerated.
In the absence of a raised urinary albumin excretion rate, any agent can be used as first-line therapy except for alpha-adrenergic blockers.
ACE inhibitors and ARBs may offer some advantages over other agents in some situations, but the two should not be used together.
CCBs should be avoided in heart failure.
Use beta-adrenergic blockers in people with angina; beta-adrenergic blockers and ACE inhibitors in people with coronary artery disease; ACE inhibitors or diuretics in those with heart failure; ACE inhibitor plus low-dose thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic, or ACE-inhibitor plus CCB in people with cerebrovascular disease.
Care should be taken with combined thiazide and β-adrenergic blockers because of risk of deterioration in metabolic control.
Add further medications from a different class if targets are not reached on maximal doses of current medications.
Aim to maintain BP ≤ 130/80 mm Hg, if therapy is well tolerated.
Revise individual targets upward if there is significant risk of postural hypotension and falls.
Higher targets should be used in older adults.
United States: American Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Recommendations, 2013
( http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/36/Supplement_1 )
Patients with confirmed BP ≥ 140/80 mm Hg should have prompt initiation and timely subsequent titration of pharmacologic therapy. Commence with a regimen that includes either an ACE inhibitor or an ARB; if one class is not tolerated, substitute the other.
Multiple drug therapy (two or more agents at maximal doses) is generally required to achieve BP targets.
People with diabetes and hypertension should be treated to a SBP goal of < 140 mm Hg.
Lower SBP targets, such as < 130 mm Hg, may be appropriate for certain individuals, such as younger patients.
Patients with diabetes should be treated to a DBP < 80 mm Hg.
United States: Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7), 2003 *
( www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/hypertension/jnc7full.pdf )
Patients not at goal BP (< 130/80 mm Hg) after attempts at lifestyle modification should be commenced on drug treatment. Regarding the selection of medications, clinical trials with diuretics, ACE inhibitors, BBs, ARBs, and calcium antagonists have a demonstrated benefit in the treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes.
The question of which class of agent is superior for lowering BP is somewhat moot because most diabetic patients will require two or more drugs to achieve BP control.
BP in patients with diabetes should be controlled to levels of 130/80 mm Hg or lower.
Europe: European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension, 2013
( www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/esc-guidelines/Pages/arterial-hypertension.aspx )
Although initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment in diabetic patients whose SBP is ≥ 160 mm Hg is mandatory, it is strongly recommended to start drug treatment also when SBP is ≥ 140 mm Hg. All classes of antihypertensive agents are recommended and can be used in patients with diabetes.
RAS blockers may be preferred,
especially in the presence of
proteinuria or microalbuminuria.
It is recommended that individual
drug choice take comorbidities
into account.
Simultaneous administration of
two blockers of the RAS is not
recommended and should be
avoided in patients with diabetes.
An SBP goal < 140 mm Hg is
recommended in patients with
diabetes.
The DBP target in patients with diabetes is recommended to be < 85 mm Hg.
ACE = Angiotensin converting enzyme; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; BB = beta blockers; CCB = calcium channel blocker; RAS = renin angiotensin system.

* Release of JNC 8 is expected during 2013.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here