Dermatologic Toxicities of Anticancer Therapy


Summary of Key Points

  • Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia

  • Cytotoxic chemotherapy agents target hair follicles that are in the proliferative growing (anagen) phase, causing an “androgen effluvium.” Less common mechanisms include telogen effluvium.

  • Chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is common. The incidence differs based on the agent, dose, and frequency of administration.

  • Increased hair shedding and hair fragility occur, with a diffuse or patching alopecia that is noticeable when 25% to 40% of scalp hairs are shed. It may be associated with symptoms of pruritus or pain but is most commonly asymptomatic.

  • CIA can dramatically affect patients' psychosocial health, resulting in significant reductions in quality of life (QoL).

  • Most treatment recommendations are based on expert opinion, although a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed. Reported preventive strategies include counseling and the use of scalp cooling, ammonium trichloro(dioxoethylene- o,o ′)tellurite (AS101), or scalp tourniquets. For acceleration of hair regrowth, minoxidil 2% twice daily has been shown to be effective.

  • CIA is typically completely reversible, although up to 60% of patients report changes in the texture, thickness, or color of their new hair.

  • Cutaneous Extravasation Injury

  • Extravasation injury is divided into irritant versus vesicant reactions. Irritant agents cause inflammation and erythema, whereas vesicant reactions may cause full-thickness skin necrosis.

  • The incidence of irritant reactions is unknown. The incidence of intravenous vesicant reactions is thought to approach 6%.

  • Extravasation of chemotherapeutic agents can cause a range of unintended adverse effects, including skin inflammation or necrosis. The severity of tissue injury after unintended extravasation ranges from mild erythema to blisters and full-thickness skin necrosis (see Figs. 41.1 and 41.2 ).

  • Pain can be significant, and rarely, compartment syndrome can result.

  • The offending drug must be stopped immediately. The subsequent treatment differs based on the chemotherapeutic agent used. A treatment algorithm is presented in Box 41.1 and Table 41.4 based on RCT findings and expert opinion.

  • Mortality is low, but the QoL impact and related morbidity are severe with vesicant chemotherapeutics.

  • Chemotherapy-Induced Hyperpigmentation

  • A variety of patterns of cutaneous hyperpigmentation have been described in association with many different cytotoxic agents.

  • The overall incidence of hyperpigmentation is unknown.

  • Cutaneous hyperpigmentation can be generalized or localized and can occur in drug-specific patterns (see Table 41.5 and Fig. 41.3 ). Mucous membranes, hair, teeth, and nails can also be affected by changes in pigmentation produced by cancer chemotherapy.

  • Cutaneous hyperpigmentation may be cosmetically displeasing with reduced QoL.

  • Limited data are available regarding treatment options.

  • Skin hyperpigmentation resolves slowly after discontinuation of therapy, and nail pigmentation grows out distally.

  • Hand-Foot Syndrome

  • Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) has numerous synonyms, including palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and acral erythema. It is caused by a variety of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents.

  • The incidence differs based on the cytotoxic agent used, the dose, and the administration frequency. Overall, the incidence ranges from 3% to 89%.

  • The clinical manifestations can vary based on severity, ranging from asymptomatic mild erythema or peeling to extremely painful full-thickness epidermal sloughing with significant functional impairment (see Fig. 41.4 ).

  • Reduced QoL due to pain and functional impairment is common. However, rare complications can include prolonged dysesthesias with loss of fingerprints, rare distal necrosis, or secondary infection.

  • Drug interruption or dose modification is the most documented intervention. Wound care to prevent infection, elevation to reduce edema, and symptomatic treatment, including routine use of topical emollients, is recommended. Celecoxib has been shown to be effective in preventing HFS in patients receiving capecitabine. Other preventive treatments suggested to be helpful include regional cooling during infusions, nicotine patches, oral vitamin E, and systemic steroids. Therapies reported to be helpful in reducing symptoms include oral steroids, oral vitamin E, celecoxib, and topical 99% dimethyl sulfoxide.

  • Severe acral pain, inflammation, and possible blister formation can cause considerable morbidity and poor patient compliance. However, HFS is typically completely reversible after drug discontinuation. Reaction severity is not thought to be related to the patient's disease status.

  • Neutrophilic Eccrine Hidradenitis

  • Neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis (NEH) is an acute dermatosis that has been associated with multiple chemotherapeutic agents; in addition to malignancies in the absence of chemotherapy, infections (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus), and nonchemotherapeutic drugs. Hence NEH is considered a reactive process. Eccrine squamous syringometaplasia (ESS) is a condition that clinically resembles NEH; however, the skin biopsy reveals a lack of neutrophils.

  • The incidence is unknown.

  • Manifestations are variable (see Fig. 41.5 ).

    Figure 41.5, Neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis.

  • There are no complications.

  • Treatment involves dose reduction or interruption.

  • The prognosis for both NEH and ESS is favorable.

  • Radiation Dermatitis

  • Radiation dermatitis is caused by ionizing radiation applied to any area of the skin. The severity is dependent on location, body surface area treated, volume of tissues irradiated, total radiation dose received, and the period over which radiation was administered.

  • Radiation dermatitis occurs in up to 95% of patients receiving ionizing radiation.

  • An acute dermatitis typically occurs within 90 days of exposure. Chronic dermatitis usually occurs after 90 days. Clinical manifestations range from mild erythema resembling a sunburn to chronic ulcerations (see Fig. 41.6 ).

  • Chronic nonhealing or infected ulcerations occur most commonly. However, chronic radiation dermatitis may be associated with the development of nonmelanoma skin cancers, atypical vascular lesions (AVLs), and angiosarcomas at irradiated sites.

  • Treatment is symptomatic. Chronic ulcerations may require persistent wound care to prevent infection and optimize skin healing. Guidance from wound care specialists may be necessary.

  • Prognosis is generally favorable after cessation of radiation therapy.

  • Radiation Recall

  • Radiation recall occurs in a previously irradiated area after administration of a chemotherapeutic agent. The exact mechanism is unclear.

  • Incidence is unknown, but it is thought to affect up to 12% of all patients receiving chemotherapy medications after radiation therapy.

  • Clinical manifestation ranges from mild erythema to severe ulceration and necrosis (see Fig. 41.7 ).

  • Complications include chronic nonhealing or infected ulcerations.

  • Treatment is symptomatic. Severe or chronic ulcerations should be managed in conjunction with wound care specialists.

  • Lesions typically resolve with symptomatic management.

  • Radiation Enhancement

  • Radiation enhancement occurs when chemotherapeutic agents act as radiation sensitizers to potentiate the effects of radiation. Chemotherapeutics must be administered within 3 weeks of radiation to produce radiation enhancement.

  • The incidence rate varies with different agents. No prospective studies have been conducted to examine incidence or prevalence rates of radiation enhancement.

  • Clinical manifestations include skin findings that resemble radiation dermatitis and radiation recall.

  • Complications can include full-thickness skin necrosis requiring care that includes treatment by a wound care specialist.

  • Treatment is symptomatic.

  • Lesions typically resolve with symptomatic management.

  • Atypical Vascular Lesions and Angiosarcomas

  • AVLs and angiosarcomas are long-term sequelae of ionizing radiation, although the mechanism of tumor development is unclear.

  • AVLs are thought to be extremely rare, with an unclear incidence rate. Angiosarcomas are estimated to occur in approximately 5 in 10,000 patients.

  • AVLs can manifest as multiple, scattered, red papules. Angiosarcomas manifest as ecchymotic-appearing patches.

  • AVLs can regress spontaneously. However, recurrent AVLs may progress to angiosarcomas. Angiosarcomas have a 50% rate of metastasis. Even after treatment, 67% of angiosarcomas may recur.

  • Tumors tend to have an aggressive course, and surgical excision for both types of tumors is recommended.

  • AVLs are typically benign, although they have a potential to transform into angiosarcomas. Prognosis for angiosarcoma is poor, with a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 36% in persons without metastatic disease.

  • Papulopustular Eruption

  • Papulopustular eruption (PPE) occurs with use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs) such as cetuximab, panitumumab, necitumumab; tyrosine kinase inhibitors specific for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) such as erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib; dual EGFR/HER2 inhibitors such as lapatinib; inhibitors of ErbB receptors such as canertinib; multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) such as vandetanib, sunitinib, and sorafenib; and MEK inhibitors such as selumetinib, trametinib, and CI-1040. Although historically referred to as “acneiform,” PPE is clinically and pathologically unrelated to acne.

  • More than 90% of patients treated with EGFRIs experience PPE.

  • PPE is marked by itchy and painful papules and pustules most commonly occurring on the face, upper back, and chest (see Fig. 41.8 ).

  • Secondary cutaneous infections develop in 38% of affected patients. PPE is also often complicated by a reduced QoL.

  • See Table 41.14 for a suggested treatment algorithm based on expert opinion.

  • Primarily, the presence and severity of EGFRI-associated PPE often correlate with good tumor response and increased patient survival. Prophylactic treatment, with the goal of reducing rash severity, does not adversely affect the inciting agent's antitumor effect; instead, it may signal an optimized treatment outcome.

  • Hand-Foot Skin Reaction

  • Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is caused by MKIs (e.g., sorafenib, sunitinib, axitinib, regorafenib, pazopanib, cabozantinib), and more recently V600E-BRAF inhibitors (V600E-BRAFIs; e.g., vemurafenib and dabrafenib).

  • HFSR occurs more frequently in patients treated with sorafenib (33.8%) than with sunitinib (19%), with a significant number of patients having severe grade 3 toxicity (6%–8%). The incidence of HFSR in patients treated with vemurafenib is 6% to 13%.

  • HFSR is marked by painful, erythematous to hyperkeratotic plaques with a characteristic halo of erythema that occur focally in areas of friction on palmoplantar surfaces with or without bullae (see Fig. 41.9 ).

  • Complications include pain and difficulty performing activities of daily living.

  • See Table 41.15 for a proposed treatment algorithm.

  • Secondary Squamous Neoplasms

  • Specific (e.g., vemurafenib, dabrafenib) and nonspecific (e.g., sorafenib) BRAF inhibitors (BRAFIs).

  • Secondary squamous neoplasms occur in 18% to 31% of patients receiving vemurafenib, 6% to 20% of patients receiving dabrafenib, and 4% to 7% of patients receiving sorafenib.

  • Keratoacanthomatous carcinomas (KACs), KAC-type invasive squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), and classic SCCs may appear.

  • Secondary squamous neoplasms are considered to be of low metastatic potential. Treatment by surgical excision without dose adjustment is recommended, although spontaneous involution can be seen. Cryotherapy or 5-fluorouracil can also be used. Furthermore, addition of MEK inhibitors has been shown to greatly reduce the incidence of SCCs.

As with other pharmacologic agents used in the treatment of human disease, the administration of anticancer drugs often results in toxic adverse effects to the skin, hair, and nails. Toxic drug reactions in the skin may occur as idiosyncratic or allergic drug reactions at ordinary therapeutic drug dosages or in a dose-dependent manner. In general, three classes of anticancer agents have unique dermatologic toxicities: cytotoxic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted anticancer therapy.

Cutaneous Complications of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

Cytotoxic chemotherapy agents are drugs that affect cell division or DNA synthesis and function. The major categories include alkylating agents, antimetabolites, anthracyclines, plant alkaloids, and others. These traditional chemotherapy agents cause many dermatologic adverse effects, including alopecia, stomatitis, hyperpigmentation, nail changes, extravasation reactions, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), and neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis (NEH). A description of all the cutaneous reactions to cancer chemotherapeutic agents is beyond the scope of this book. Instead, this chapter highlights a group of reactions that are fairly common and yet unique to cancer chemotherapy. Cutaneous complications can be severe and may modify the ultimate course of chemotherapy, whereas others can be treated symptomatically without adversely affecting the treatment course. See Table 41.1 for a summary of cutaneous toxicities to cytotoxic agents.

Table 41.1
Cutaneous Toxicities Due to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
Modified from Balagula Y, Rosen ST, Lacouture ME. The emergence of supportive oncodermatology: the study of dermatologic adverse events to cancer therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(3):624–635.
Agent Indications
ANTIMETABOLITES
Pemetrexed Exanthem, radiation recall, urticarial vasculitis
Capecitabine Hand-foot syndrome, stomatitis, acral hyperpigmentation, palmoplantar keratoderma, pyogenic granuloma, inflammation of actinic keratoses, mucosal hyperpigmentation
Fludarabine Exanthem, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, paraneoplastic pemphigus
Cladribine Exanthem, toxic epidermolytic necrolysis
Tegafur Hand-foot syndrome, acral hyperpigmentation, melanonychia, brittle nails, photoallergic and photolichenoid eruptions, pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta
Gemcitabine Alopecia, mucositis, morbilliform exanthem, radiation recall, linear immunoglobulin A bullous dermatitis, scleroderma-like changes, lipodermatosclerosis, pseudocellulitis (resembling erysipelas), pseudolymphoma, Stevens-Johnson syndrome
5-Fluorouracil Radiation enhancement, radiation recall, photosensitive reactions, cutaneous and nail hyperpigmentation, hand-foot syndrome, inflammation of actinic keratoses, onycholysis
TOPOISOMERASE-INTERACTING AGENTS
Irinotecan Alopecia, mucositis
Topotecan Alopecia, morbilliform exanthem, neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis
Doxorubicin/liposomal doxorubicin Hand-foot syndrome, radiation recall and enhancement, neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis, hyperpigmentation, alopecia, mucositis, ultraviolet recall, extravasation reactions, formation of melanocytic macules
Liposomal daunorubicin, idarubicin Alopecia, mucositis, extravasation reactions
Radiation recall, alopecia, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, nail hyperpigmentation, extravasation reactions
ANTIMICROTUBULE AGENTS
Paclitaxel Alopecia, radiation recall, erythema multiforme, onycholysis, hand-foot syndrome, photosensitivity, scleroderma-like changes, subcutaneous lupus erythematosus, subungual hemorrhage
Docetaxel Mucositis, alopecia, erythema, pruritus, desquamation, hand-foot syndrome, fixed erythrodysesthesia plaque, radiation recall, urticaria, exanthems, nail changes, subungual hemorrhage, scleroderma-like changes, subcutaneous lupus erythematosus, extravasations reactions, photosensitivity
Vincristine, vinblastine, vinorelbine Phlebitis, alopecia, hand-foot syndrome, extravasation reactions

Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia

Etiology and Biocharacteristics

The hair follicle is a highly organized structure within the skin. At the base of every follicle is a collection of rapidly dividing matrix cells that form an outwardly growing hair shaft. Hair follicle formation is complete at birth, with approximately 100,000 terminal hair follicles on the infant scalp. Although pharmacologic intervention has been helpful to aid in hair regrowth, hair follicles cannot be regenerated if they are destroyed. The hair follicle cycles through three phases: growth phase (anagen), a short involuting and regressing phase (catagen), and a resting phase (telogen) that results in hair shedding. On the scalp, 85%, 5%, and 10% of the scalp's hair, respectively, are in these phases at a given time. Stem cells from the hair bulge, a permanent portion of the follicle, act as an endless source of hair matrix cells. The hair matrix cells subsequently divide during the proliferative anagen phase, marking the beginning of the hair cycle.

In general, the most common mechanism for cytotoxic chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA) is anagen effluvium—that is, a pattern of hair loss in which anagen hairs are selectively shed. Because cytotoxic agents target rapidly proliferating cell populations, they attack not only cancer cells but also the rapidly dividing hair matrix cells in anagen phase. This toxic effect on the follicle, as well as the hair shaft itself, leads to anagen hairs falling out with mild pressure, or breaking off at the scalp surface as a result of increased hair fragility (due to weak points in the hair shaft, referred to as Pohl-Pinkus constrictions ). Molecularly, the mechanism by which these changes occur is largely unknown. However, the nuclear transcription factor p53 is thought to play a crucial role in initiating apoptosis in anagen effluvium–type CIA, because CIA does not develop in mice lacking p53 when they are treated with cyclophosphamide. Fas and c-kit have also been implicated. The duration of time until recovery, hair regrowth, and hair repigmentation appears to be dependent on the therapeutic dose and the degree of follicular dystrophy. Because the permanent pool of stem cells in the follicle is unaffected by most chemotherapy agents, CIA is typically reversible.

Another mechanism for cytotoxic CIA is telogen effluvium, a type of hair loss that occurs when a greater proportion of anagen hairs transition into the catagen or telogen phase simultaneously. Hair shedding 3 to 4 months after the initial drug exposure is characteristic of persons with telogen effluvium because the duration of the catagen and telogen hair phases is approximately 3 to 4 months. Agents that frequently lead to telogen effluvium include methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and retinoids. The remainder of this section discusses anagen effluvium–type CIA.

Permanent alopecia, although rare, can occur. In a retrospective review of 8430 patients, seven patients had permanent CIA. Two of these patients were treated with busulphan, and five patients were treated with taxanes.

Epidemiology

The incidence of CIA is unclear, given the lack of standardized grading scales or large epidemiologic studies. However, certain drugs are more commonly associated with CIA, including cyclophosphamide (an alkylating agent), bleomycin and dactinomycin (antitumor antibiotics), doxorubicin (an anthracycline), irinotecan and topotecan (topoisomerase inhibitors), and docetaxel and paclitaxel (taxanes). In addition to the cytotoxic agent, the risk of CIA also depends on the drug route, dose, and frequency of administration. For example, high-dose, intermittent, intravenous, and combination chemotherapy regimens are more likely to induce alopecia than are low-dose single agents. Several single-nucleotide polymorphisms have been associated with CIA, suggesting a genetic predisposition in certain populations.

Clinical Manifestations

Anagen effluvium–type CIA mainly affects the scalp, given the large percentage (85%) of anagen hairs at this site. Other sites including the eyebrows, eyelashes, beard, genitalia, and axillae can also be affected over time, although much less frequently. Anagen effluvium typically begins within days to weeks after initial drug exposure and worsens during the next 1 to 2 months. Patients may initially describe hairs on their pillowcase in the morning or collecting in their shower. Reduced scalp hairs are noticeable once 24% to 40% of a person's hair is lost and can manifest with diffuse, patchy, or complete hair loss. Although the vertex (top) of the scalp is the most common site for hair loss, Yun and Kim demonstrated that the presence or absence of frontal hairline hair loss (described as a “receding” hairline) appears to differ based on gender. Women are less likely to lose hair at their frontal hairline compared with men, mimicking the gender-based differences seen in androgenetic or male-pattern baldness. In addition, alopecia was found to be asymptomatic in 50% of patients, with the remainder reporting associated pain (15.6%), pruritus (12%), or both (11%).

Multiple studies, particularly in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer, have demonstrated that CIA dramatically reduces patients' quality of life (QoL). In a literature review of patients with breast cancer, alopecia was consistently thought of as the most devastating chemotherapy-related adverse effect, resulting in decreased QoL and poor self-image. Yeager and Olsen summarized the following information: Study patients have reported that losing their hair was a worse experience than losing their breast, that the hair loss was a visible reminder of their cancer to others as well as to themselves, and that the severity of the psychological effect was not related to hair loss severity. In fact, some women have refused chemotherapy because of the risk of losing their hair, and in one study, 8% of women considered refusing chemotherapy because of the risk of CIA. Although most QoL studies have focused on women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, recent studies have suggested that men often have similar and equally negative experiences with CIA as women, ranking alopecia as one of the most severe and bothersome chemotherapy adverse effects. In fact, an equal number of male patients were found to be receptive to paying increased fees to receive a chemotherapy regimen that would reduce their risk of experiencing CIA.

Workup

No laboratory workup is necessary because CIA is diagnosed clinically. Quantifying the severity of alopecia is recommended. The National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) has proposed a grading scale ( Table 41.2 ), and other scales exist as well.

Table 41.2
Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia Grading Scale a and Proposed Treatment Algorithm
Data from Balagula Y, Rosen ST, Lacouture ME. The emergence of supportive oncodermatology: the study of dermatologic adverse events to cancer therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(3):624–365 and Krause K, Foitzik K. Biology of the hair follicle: the basics. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2006;25(1):2–10.
Grade and Severity Description Treatment
0 Prevention:

  • Counseling

    • Discuss anticipated alopecia

    • Evaluate anticipated reaction and consider preemptive psychological evaluation

    • Provide list of resources for camouflage preemptively

  • Not routinely recommended: scalp cooling, AS100, scalp tourniquet

1 = MILD TO MODERATE
  • Hair loss <50% of normal

  • Not obvious from a distance (only on close inspection)

  • A different hairstyle may be needed to cover hair loss

  • Does not require a wig or hairpiece

  • Acknowledge hair loss and inquire about coping mechanisms

  • Continue to offer support and resources

Camouflage:

  • Wigs (synthetic vs human)

  • Cotton scarves or turbans

Acceleration of hair regrowth:

  • Consider minoxidil 2% twice a day for the duration of and after chemotherapy

Frequent:

  • Bleomycin

  • Mechlorethamine

  • Methotrexate

Infrequent:

  • 5-Fluorouracil

  • Hydroxyurea

  • Thiotepa

2 = SEVERE
  • Hair loss of ≥50% of normal

  • Readily apparent to others

  • A wig or hairpiece is necessary if complete camouflage is desired

  • Associated with psychosocial impact

  • Same as above

Frequent:

  • Doxorubicin

  • Daunorubicin

  • Paclitaxel

  • Docetaxel

  • Cyclophosphamide

  • Ifosfamide

  • Etoposide

Infrequent:

  • Vincristine

  • Vinblastine

a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

Although many patients are aware of CIA as an adverse effect of chemotherapy, few are prepared for the QoL and psychological impact of this condition. If depression or other mental health issues are suspected, a referral to a psychiatrist is recommended.

Differential Diagnosis

Telogen effluvium, as previously described, is caused by significant emotional or physical stress, including high fever, surgery, loss of a loved one, and nutritional deficiencies, as well as by many medications, including some chemotherapy agents (e.g., methotrexate). Telogen effluvium is first noticeable about 3 to 6 months after the inciting agent has been administered and is temporary. The incidence of telogen effluvium–type CIA is unclear, but it is thought to occur less commonly than anagen effluvium–type CIA.

Androgenetic alopecia (or “male-pattern” alopecia) typically manifests as gradual hair thinning at the crown and vertex of the scalp. It would not normally occur in the setting of cancer drug administration; however, patients with a predisposition toward androgenetic alopecia may experience CIA in locations similar to that of androgenetic alopecia.

As permanent hair loss can also be experienced secondary to chemotherapeutic agents, it is an important consideration for those experiencing hair loss or incomplete hair regrowth lasting longer than 6 months after the cessation of treatment.

Treatment

Preemptive counseling

It is important for the clinician to fully appreciate the extremely negative and often devastating psychological impact that both male and female patients who undergo chemotherapy can experience with rapid loss of hair. Before initiation of chemotherapy, patients should be counseled that CIA will be a likely adverse effect. Physicians should evaluate patients' perception of CIA and develop a plan for coping with the anticipated adverse effect. A multidisciplinary approach that includes psychiatric services may be necessary. A list of local hair resources such as scarf stores and suppliers of fitted wigs and head coverings should be provided. A prescription for a fitted hair prosthesis can be provided; the cost of such a prosthesis may or may not be reimbursed by the patient's health insurance. Internet sites and alopecia support groups, such as the American Cancer Society or the National Alopecia Areata Foundation, can also provide local resources for patients and families. Treatment agents to prevent CIA and to promote hair regrowth have been studied. A treatment algorithm based on randomized controlled trial (RCT) data is presented in Table 41.2 .

Preventive treatment

Scalp cooling via the use of ice packs or cooling cap devices is by far the most well-studied and well-published technique for preventing CIA, dating back to the 1970s. Scalp hypothermia is postulated to prevent CIA by reducing blood perfusion and therefore chemotherapy delivery to the scalp, reducing intrafollicular metabolism. Despite differences in chemotherapy regimens, patient populations, hair-loss evaluation methods, and cooling mechanisms, a significant advantage in the amount of hair preserved, with some patients retaining more than 50% of their hair with scalp cooling during chemotherapy, was found in multiple RCTs. Currently, these devices have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of CIA in women with breast cancer. Given the concern that cooling could provide a protective environment for micrometastases, the use of scalp cooling caps are not recommended for patients with hematologic malignancies (e.g., mycosis fungoides or acute myeloblastic leukemia), and frequent scalp evaluations are recommended if cooling devices are used.

The use of scalp tourniquets (in which a sphygmomanometer cuff headband is used to decrease the blood supply to the head) employs a similar mechanism to scalp cooling in the prevention of CIA. In a phase II RCT of 58 patients, AS101 was found to significantly decrease the incidence and severity of CIA in patients treated with carboplatin-etoposide therapy compared with control subjects. Its protective effect against CIA is unclear but is thought to be linked to an upregulation of macrophage-derived factors, including interleukin-1. In contrast, topical minoxidil 2% and topical calcitriol (a vitamin D 3 analogue) were found to lack efficacy in preventing CIA. A fusion protein of parathyroid hormone linked to a collagen binding domain demonstrated decreased hair loss and more rapid regrowth in a dose-dependent fashion in mice treated with cyclophosphamide. In another mouse study, topical epinephrine was associated with 95% suppression of the alopecia induced by systemic N -nitroso- N -methylurea (MNU) and 16% suppression of alopecia from Cytoxan.

Treatments for acceleration of hair growth after chemotherapy

Once CIA is noted by the physician, the hair loss should be acknowledged. Treatment intervention may include camouflage or agents aimed at accelerating hair regrowth. Three modulators of the hair growth cycle (minoxidil, cyclosporine A, and 17β-estradiol) have shown promise in animal studies. However, only topical minoxidil has been evaluated in a human RCT. Although topical minoxidil 2% has been shown to be ineffective in preventing the onset of CIA, a topical minoxidil 2% solution applied twice daily was found to shorten the period from hair loss to regrowth from 137 days to 50 days.

Prognosis

Because chemotherapy effects spare the quiescent stem cells in the hair bulge of follicles, cytotoxic CIA is completely reversible in most cases. The hair follicle resumes normal cycling within a few weeks of treatment cessation, and regrowth becomes apparent 1 to 6 months after withdrawal of the offending medication and may even occur during prolonged cycles of therapy. Many patients report a change in the texture, thickness, or color of the new hair. These alterations may affect up to 60% of patients. Hence appropriate counseling of patients who are being treated with these agents may be warranted.

Cutaneous Extravasation Injury

Etiology and Biocharacteristics

Extravasation injury occurs as local tissue injury and necrosis from accidental chemotherapy extravasation in surrounding tissues. Nitrogen mustard, doxorubicin, and related anthracyclines were among the first agents reported to cause surrounding soft tissue necrosis and irritation, in the 1970s. Intravenously administered drugs can be classified into five categories according to their damage potential: vesicants, exfoliants, irritants, inflammitants, and neutrals, which are described in more detail later ( Table 41.3 ).

Table 41.3
Vesicants and Irritants That Cause Extravasation Reactions
From Langer SW. Extravasation of chemotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep. 2010;12(4):242–246.
Vesicants Exfoliants Irritants Inflammitants Neutrals
Actinomycin D
Dactinomycin
Daunorubicin
Doxorubicin
Epirubicin
Idarubicin
Mitomycin C
Vinblastine
Vincristine
Vindesine
Vinorelbine
Aclacinomycin
Cisplatin
Docetaxel
Liposomal doxorubicin
Mitoxantrone
Oxaliplatin
Paclitaxel
Bendamustine
Bleomycin
Carboplatin
Dexrazoxane
Etoposide
Teniposide
Topotecan
Bortezomib
5-Fluorouracil
Methotrexate
Raltitrexed
Asparaginase
Bevacizumab
Bleomycin
Bortezomib
Cetuximab
Cyclophosphamide
Cytarabine
Eribulin
Fludarabine
Gemcitabine
Ifosfamide
Melphalan
Rituximab
Trastuzumab

Epidemiology

The true incidence of chemotherapy extravasation is unknown. The incidence of intravenous, vesicant chemotherapy extravasation is estimated to be 1% to 6%. The concentration, type, and amount of vesicant, as well as the location of extravasation, can all influence the degree of resultant tissue necrosis. Additional risk factors include highly alkaline, acidic, or hypertonic solutions; rigid or indwelling vascular access devices; and patient characteristics, including sclerosed or fragile veins, obesity, an inability to verbalize pain, or an impaired sensory perception.

Clinical Manifestations

After accidental drug extravasation of chemotherapy agents into the surrounding tissue, a wide range of symptoms and manifestations occur. Clinical manifestations can be subdivided into five reactions ( Figs. 41.1 and 41.2 ). Vesicants result in tissue necrosis or formation of blisters when accidentally infused into tissue surrounding a vein. Vesicant agents are further divided into DNA-binding and non–DNA-binding categories. DNA-binding agents (e.g., mechlorethamine, doxorubicin, and mitomycin C) bind to DNA in healthy cells, initiating necrosis through cell death. Adjacent cells take up complexes of DNA-bound drug via endocytosis, causing cell necrosis in nearby cells. Non–DNA-binding drugs (e.g., vinblastine, vincristine, and paclitaxel) cause irritation but tend to cause less severe effects.

Figure 41.1, Irritant extravasation reaction.

Figure 41.2, Vesicant extravasation reactions. (A–B) Late-stage lesions with a central eschar, beneath which lies an extensive area of subcutaneous necrosis.

Exfoliants cause inflammation and shedding of skin without causing underlying tissue death. They may cause superficial tissue injury, blisters, and desquamation. Irritants cause inflammation, pain, or irritation at the extravasation site, without any blister formation. Irritant-type chemotherapy agents are not directly toxic to the tissue, with clinical symptoms thought to be related to the inflammatory response. Inflammitants cause mild to moderate inflammation, painless skin erythema, and elevation (flare reaction) at the extravasation site. Neutrals cause neither inflammation nor damage with extravasation.

Workup

Extravasation injury should be suspected in any patient with persistent pain, erythema, and swelling, even in the absence of ulceration, and immediate action should be taken. Serial neurovascular examinations and compartment examinations are appropriate to monitor for impending compartment syndrome. If the injury is severe or complicated by neurovascular changes, surgical consultation is required.

Treatment

Data regarding the treatment of extravasation injuries is largely limited to case reports and case series. However, several treatment guidelines have been published.

Prevention

Prevention is the cornerstone of management of chemotherapy extravasation reactions. Anecdotal guidelines published in the literature are presented in Box 41.1 .

Box 41.1
Data from Hannon MG, Lee SK. Extravasation injuries. J Hand Surg. 2011;36(12):2060–2065 and Wengstrom Y, Margulies A. European Oncology Nursing Society extravasation guidelines. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008;12(4):357–361.
Recommendations for Prevention of Extravasation Necrosis

  • Prevention begins with selection of the infusion site.

  • The preferred site of infusion is the proximal forearm that has not been surgically compromised, and where a large amount of subcutaneous tissue overlies vital structures.

  • Dorsal surfaces of the hands and the antecubital fossae, as well as extremities that have been sites of extensive ablative surgery, should be avoided. If these tissue-poor areas must be used, a subcutaneous flexible indwelling catheter is preferred rather than the standard intravenous needle. When multiple infusions are anticipated over a prolonged period, placement of subcutaneous reservoirs with long indwelling lines should be considered. Drugs should always be administered through a free-flowing intravenous line. Any hint of obstruction within the line calls for immediate termination of the infusion and an attempt at correcting the problem.

  • Every attempt should be made to administer a solution that is as dilute as possible over the shortest period of time to prevent injury from concentrated drug and eliminate lengthy exposure of tissues to a toxic agent.

Pharmacologic and surgical treatment

Prompt recognition and treatment of extravasation reactions are necessary, because delayed management can lead to unnecessary tissue necrosis, scarring, and contracture. After recognition of extravasation injury, several steps should be taken. These recommendations are presented in Table 41.4 . Notably, dexrazoxane is the first agent approved by the FDA for treatment of chemotherapy extravasation injuries, specifically those associated with anthracyclines. In clinical trials, 1000 mg/m 2 was given within 6 hours after the extravasation injury; 1000 mg/m 2 24 hours later; and 500 mg/m 2 another 24 hours later. This medication was shown to definitively decrease the need for surgical intervention.

Table 41.4
Drug-Specific Treatments for Extravasation Necrosis
General Recommendations Source
Stop infusion immediately Prospective observational study
Leave intravenous cannula in place and attempt to remove as much of the vesicant as possible with a 10-mL syringe Retrospective review
Saline flush-out technique
Goal: to remove as much vesicant as possible (total of 500 mL of fluid recommended)
Retrospective review
Consensus guidelines
Vinca Alkaloid and Taxane Extravasation Goal: Dispersion and Dilution of Agent
Local heat application to disperse the drug (20 min, 4 times daily × 1–2 days) Consensus guidelines
Hyaluronidase local subcutaneous injection (150–1500 IU diluted in 1 mL of sterile water) Anecdotal
Anthracycline Extravasation Goal: Prevent Dispersion and Neutralize Agent
Cold compresses to prevent dispersion; 20 min, 4 times daily for 1–2 days Consensus guidelines
Dexrazoxane administration (approved by the US Food and Drug Administration); works most effectively as single agent Clinical trials
Topical dimethyl sulfoxide 99% application (use is controversial)

  • Free radical scavenger, also for mitomycin C and actinomycin C

  • Applied in a thin layer and allowed to dry, followed by a nonocclusive dressing within 10–25 min, repeated every 8 h for 1 wk

  • Dimethyl sulfoxide should not be used together with topical corticosteroids

Consensus guidelines
Prospective study
Mechlorethamine (Nitrogen Mustard) Extravasation Goal: Prevent Alkylation and Tissue Destruction by Providing Substitute Substrate for Alkylation in the Tissue
Sodium thiosulfate (use is controversial)

  • Subcutaneous local injection of 2 mL of solution (4 mL sodium thiosulfate + 6 mL sterile water)

Consensus guidelines

Although routine surgical intervention is not indicated, knowing when to obtain surgical consultation and the timing of surgical intervention when needed are of utmost importance to prevent increases in patient morbidity. Severe extravasation injury, blistering, ulceration, and persistent pain may indicate the need for surgical intervention and should prompt surgical consultation.

Prognosis

The morbidity associated with extravasation injury is high, but mortality is rare. Intravenous vesicant chemotherapeutic agents can cause severe damage to local tissue, leading to possible tissue necrosis, which can result in chronic damage such as scarring. In contrast, irritant drugs cause inflammatory reactions with rare long-term sequelae.

The degree of discomfort experienced by some patients is severe enough to cause voluntary termination of treatment, and the risk of extravasation injury should be discussed before initiation of therapy. The impairment accompanying extravasation injury has no effect on disease status, and thus there is no reason to stop further treatments with a given agent. Unless extravasation occurs again, retreatment of the patient with the same agent is not associated with recurrence of necrosis.

Chemotherapy-Induced Hyperpigmentation

Etiology and Biocharacteristics

Increased pigmentation from cancer chemotherapy is due to increased deposition of melanin in the affected tissue rather than an accumulation of the drug or its byproducts in the skin. Melanin, a pigment product or polymer, is produced within the basal layer of the epidermis of skin, nails, and hair follicles by melanocytes. Melanocytes package the pigment into melanosomes and distribute them to neighboring epithelial cells via dendritic processes. Alterations in baseline pigmentation can occur when there is an increase in melanin production, an increase in the size of melanosomes, or a change in the distribution of melanosomes within the epithelial cells of skin, nails, and hair. How chemotherapeutic agents act to produce increased melanin deposition is unknown. They may increase pigmentation by a direct stimulatory or toxic effect on melanocytes and/or by slowing the turnover and transit rates of epithelial cells, thus allowing more time for the transfer of melanin to occur. Other proposed theories for chemotherapy-induced hyperpigmentation have implicated adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and melanocyte-stimulating hormone. However, no elevations of these hormones were noted in studies evaluating the role of ACTH and melanocyte-stimulating hormone in patients with chemotherapy-induced pigment abnormalities.

Epidemiology

Although it is believed to be fairly common, the rate of pigment alteration in patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy agents is unknown. The incidence of hyperpigmentation varies by agent, with certain medications being more commonly associated with pigmentary alterations than others. For example, hyperpigmentation develops in up to 20% of patients treated with bleomycin and in up to 5% of patients treated with 5-FU. In addition, chemotherapy-related hyperpigmentation has not been found to correlate with any systemic effects of chemotherapy, with no health threats other than concerns for cosmesis.

Clinical Manifestations

Please see Fig. 41.3 and refer to Table 41.5 for specific hyperpigmentation changes related to chemotherapeutic agents.

Figure 41.3, (A) Bleomycin-induced flagellate hyperpigmentation. (B) Docetaxel-induced supravenous hyperpigmentation. Erythematous, linear lesions in persons treated with bleomycin and erythematous supravenous lesions in persons treated with docetaxel often precede the appearance of increased pigmentation.

Table 41.5
Chemotherapeutic Agents Associated With Hyperpigmentation or Discoloration
Data from Balagula Y, Rosen ST, Lacouture ME. The emergence of supportive oncodermatology: the study of dermatologic adverse events to cancer therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(3):624–635 and Yeager CE, Olsen EA. Treatment of chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Dermatol Ther. 2011;24(4):432–442.
Alkylating Agents Presentation
Busulfan Generalized hyperpigmentation, may resemble Addison disease
BCNU (carmustine) Hyperpigmentation at sites of topical application
Cyclophosphamide Diffuse hyperpigmentation of the skin and mucous membranes; localized hyperpigmentation of the nails (transverse, longitudinal or diffuse), palms and soles, or teeth
Mechlorethamine Diffuse hyperpigmentation
Thiotepa Hyperpigmentation under sites of occlusion (e.g., adhesive tape)
ANTIBIOTICS
Actinomycin Serpentine supravenous hyperpigmentation
Bleomycin Linear, flagellate bands, associated with minor trauma
Dactinomycin Intertriginous, trauma-induced, and diffuse hyperpigmentation
Daunorubicin Diffuse hyperpigmentation, transverse pigmented nail bands, polycyclic pigmentation of the scalp (less common)
Doxorubicin Localized pigmentation of the nails, palms, soles, dorsal hands, face, and interphalangeal and palmar creases; diffuse pigmentation (less common); intraoral pigmentation (buccal mucosa and tongue); horizontal or longitudinal nail bands
MITOTIC INHIBITORS
Etoposide Hyperpigmentation in occluded areas
Ifosfamide Pigment changes on acral surfaces and occluded areas
Mithramycin Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation after flushing and facial edema
Paclitaxel Localized hyperpigmentation
Procarbazine Localized hyperpigmentation
ANTIMETABOLITES
5-Fluorouracil Hyperpigmentation of sun-exposed skin or previously irradiated sites; serpentine supravenous hyperpigmentation after repeated infusions; reticulate hyperpigmentation on the back and buttocks (less common); acral pigmentation; transverse banding of the nails
Methotrexate Horizontal hair banding (“flag sign”)
MISCELLANEOUS DRUGS
Cisplatin Hyperpigmentation of gingival margin; hyperpigmentation at sites of pressure
Hydroxyurea Generalized hyperpigmentation, occasionally longitudinal nail bands

Workup

No laboratory or imaging studies are necessary, because chemotherapy-induced hyperpigmentation is diagnosed clinically.

Differential Diagnosis

Generalized hyperpigmentation

Addison disease or primary adrenal insufficiency, which can be caused by metastatic carcinoma or Hodgkin lymphoma, causes a diffuse hyperpigmentation, often exacerbated by exposure to the sun, with constitutional symptoms of fatigue, anorexia, and malaise. In contrast to busulfan, Addison disease also involves the oral mucosa and is accentuated in skin folds and creases, areolae, and genitalia. In contrast to chemotherapy-induced hyperpigmentation, individuals with Addison disease have an elevated ACTH level as well as an abnormal response to ACTH stimulation.

Hemochromatosis, an iron storage disease, shows diffuse bronze pigmentation. The acquired form can occur in patients who have received multiple blood transfusions. Hepatomegaly is usually present. Hyperpigmentation is primarily secondary to melanin, but hemosiderin deposition can also be present in the skin.

Advanced metastatic melanoma can also be associated with generalized hyperpigmentation and melanuria.

Localized hyperpigmentation

Melasma is an acquired macular brown pigmentation of the face that becomes pronounced with sun exposure. It can be seen during pregnancy and in patients who take an oral contraceptive or undergo phenytoin therapy. Multiple pigmented longitudinal nail bands can occur as a normal finding in dark-skinned individuals and can be seen in those with metastatic melanoma. These bands are caused by benign melanocytic hyperplasia, lentigines, or junctional nevi within the nail matrix.

Diffuse brown nail pigmentation can be caused by drugs other than cytotoxic agents, such as antimalarial agents, phenothiazines, tetracyclines, psoralens, and heavy metal therapy. These agents share a similar mechanism with chemotherapy agents.

Increased melanin deposition in tissues can be caused by drugs such as tetracyclines and antimalarial agents. Although this pigment deposition characteristically occurs on the shins and face, any area on the body can be affected.

Treatment

Because chemotherapy-induced hyperpigmentation results from increased melanin deposition, therapies targeting melanin may be useful. An RCT found that a combination of nicotinamide and N -acetylglucosamine (NAG) applied daily over a period of 10 weeks resulted in significantly decreased facial hyperpigmentation than the vehicle control formulation. Another vehicle-controlled randomized trial found a combination of niacinamide and tranexamic acid applied twice daily over 8 weeks resulted in significantly decreased facial hyperpigmentation.

Prognosis

Hyperpigmentation as a result of the use of cytotoxic agents is primarily a cosmetic problem and should not affect treatment regimens. Although some patients might experience psychological distress, they can be reassured that cutaneous hyperpigmentation, which may persist for several months, usually resolves after cessation of treatment. Nail pigmentation also resolves as the nails grow after treatment is discontinued.

Toxic Erythema of Chemotherapy

HFS, NEH, and eccrine squamous syringometaplasia (ESS) are three overlapping cutaneous reactions to cytotoxic chemotherapy agents. Although classically described as three distinct entities, they are all characterized by painful erythema favoring the hands and feet, intertriginous areas, elbows, knees, and ears. These reactions occur 2 to 3 weeks after administration of chemotherapy. Their pathogenesis is presumed to be related to the concentration of cytotoxic agents in sweat. Other similarities include their self-limited nature and healing associated with desquamation and hyperpigmentation. In addition, dose reductions or increased time between cycles is the mainstay to help minimize the risk of recurrence. Because of their shared characteristics, it has been suggested that these reactions should be reclassified under an umbrella category, termed toxic erythema of chemotherapy (TEC). HFS, NEH, and ESS are discussed in the following sections as particular patterns of TEC.

Hand-Foot Syndrome

Etiology and Biocharacteristics

HFS is a common, painful, erythematous eruption of the palms and soles associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy agents. In the current literature, this syndrome is referred to as either hand-foot syndrome or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. During the 1980s, HFS was referred to as chemotherapy-induced acral erythema. However, this nonspecific descriptive nomenclature has largely been abandoned. Of note, HFS associated with cytotoxic drugs should not be mistaken for hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), a condition associated with newer, molecularly targeted agents that is described later in this chapter.

Multiple cytotoxic drugs have been reported to cause HFS. Most commonly, these drugs include pyrimidine analogues (e.g., capecitabine, cytarabine, and 5-FU), anthracyclines (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin more than doxorubicin), and taxanes (e.g., docetaxel). Less commonly reported causative agents include paclitaxel, hydroxyurea, methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, daunorubicin, etoposide, vinorelbine, irinotecan, epirubicin, 6-thioguanine, and tegafur.

Although the pathogenesis of HFS is unknown, a direct toxic effect of chemotherapeutic agents on the skin is considered the most likely mechanism. Factors hypothesized to play a role include the more rapid cell division in palmoplantar skin compared with back skin, an increased concentration of capecitabine's activating enzyme (thymidine phosphorylase) in palmoplantar locations, an overexpression of cyclooxygenase 2 in the skin as a result of chemotherapy-induced inflammation, and increased drug concentration in the eccrine glands of the palms and soles secondary to drug excretion in sweat.

A role for excretion from sweat glands is supported by the observation that taxanes and liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin can affect areas besides the hands and feet that have an abundance of sweat glands, such as inguinal areas and the axillae. Recent investigations using laser scanning microscopy have shown that liposomal doxorubicin reaches the skin surface via sweat glands and is deposited in the stratum corneum. However, it is unclear to what degree different cytotoxic drugs share a similar mechanism in causing HFS, and further research is necessary.

Epidemiology

The overall incidence rates for HFS have been reported to vary between 5% and 89%, based on the cytotoxic agent, drug formulation, and administration schedules. In persons with this condition, symptoms were dose limiting in 30% of patients.

Risk factors for the development of HFS appear to be related to factors that prolong drug exposure to the cytotoxic agent, including higher doses, greater cumulative doses, drug formulations that increase a drug's half-life (e.g., liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin), and increased frequency of administration (e.g., oral daily ingestion of capecitabine, continuous intravenous 5-FU infusions, or a greater number of treatment cycles). Although unconfirmed, patient-specific risk factors have been reported to include the occurrence of mucositis, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here