Contact Lens Applications in Corneal Disease


Key Concepts

  • There is a role for contact lenses beyond the routine correction of refractive error.

  • Innovations in lens materials and in lens design have expanded the role of contact lenses in the treatment of distorted corneas and in ocular surface disease.

  • Soft lenses made of hydrogels and silicone-hydrogel have utility as bandage therapeutic lenses after trauma and surgical intervention, with silicone-hydrogel lenses offering maximal oxygen transmission.

  • Silicone-hydrogel keratoconus designs, hybrid lenses, and miniscleral lenses are a promising alternative to RGP corneal lenses or keratoplasty for mild to moderate cases of corneal ectasia.

  • Scleral lenses and prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) treatment are important alternatives to keratoplasty for patients with ectasia or irregular astigmatism who are intolerant of rigid gas permeable (RGP) corneal lenses.

  • Advances in soft lenses and scleral lenses provide therapeutic options for ocular surface disease unresponsive to medical therapy.

  • Cornea specialists should be aware of innovations in contact lenses so as to fully inform patients of options for treatment of disease.

Introduction

Since the early 1900s contact lenses have evolved from non-oxygen-permeable rigid lenses made of glass or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) to the comfort of modern lenses composed of soft silicone hydrogel (SiHy) materials. With the introduction of the first commercially available soft lens by Otto Wichterle in 1971, low-cost contact lenses became widely available for patients who were unable to tolerate wear of the hard, oxygen-impermeable materials. As the popularity of these lenses grew, so did the apparent need for improvement in physiologic performance. The continued advances in designs over several decades led to the development of newer lenses that are physiologically superior to their original soft lens counterparts, in that their constituent polymers allow more oxygen to reach the surface of the eye, thereby reducing the incidence of lens-related complications. While these new hyper-oxygen-transmissible lenses have been widely accepted into routine clinical practice for the correction of refractive error, they also offer significant advantages in the visual rehabilitation of patients with abnormal corneas who demonstrate an increased demand for oxygen, and for therapeutic use in wound healing and ocular surface disease. In the nonpathologic cornea, contact lenses are routinely used as the primary mode of vision correction. It is estimated that the population of contact lens users in the United States is nearly 40 million and that the current value of the worldwide contact lens market is approximately 7.5 billion (US) dollars.

Contact Lens Materials: Historical Overview

Historically, hard contact lenses, commonly prescribed until the early 1980s, were made of PMMA, an oxygen-impermeable rigid and inflexible material. In addition to the lack of comfort these lenses produced, complications driven by the diminished supply of oxygen to the central cornea included corneal warpage, vascularization, central corneal clouding or edema, and endothelial cell polymegathism. To increase comfort and oxygen supply to the cornea, soft hydrogel lenses were introduced.

Soft Lens Innovations

Hydrogel Lenses

Conventional soft, flexible lenses are composed of a HEMA (2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) core polymer, a hydrophilic monomer that functions to absorb water. Alone, HEMA-based lenses contain 38% water and are considered low-water content lenses. The addition of co-monomers such as N -vinyl-pyrrolidone (NVP) and methacrylic acid (MAA) increases the overall water content of the lens material from 38% to as high as 70%.

The increased proportion of absorbed water in a specific lens material will result in a corresponding exponential increase in oxygen permeability, defined as Dk , where D is the diffusion coefficient of the material and k is the solubility constant. The oxygen transmissibility of a specific lens is a measure of oxygen permeability as a function of lens thickness, Dk/t.

Lens hydration or water content is also one of two factors used by the US Food and Drug Administration to classify hydrogel lens materials into four different groups to enable prediction of their performance with different contact lens care solutions. The second factor in the classification guidelines is the electrostatic charge or ionic property of the lens material. Ionic lenses are composed of materials that carry a negative electrical charge, which can react with positively charged tear film components and solutions. These lenses tend to have a higher rate of surface deposits. Nonionic lenses are considered electrically neutral and possess an intrinsic resistance to surface deposits. A familiarity with lenses belonging to each class is important when fitting patients experiencing issues with lens dryness and/or surface deposits. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lens material classification guidelines are shown in Table 98.1 .

TABLE 98.1
FDA Classification of Hydrogel Lenses
Group Water Ionicity
1 Low (<50%) Nonionic
2 High (>50%) Nonionic
3 Low (<50%) Ionic
4 High (>50%) Ionic

Silicone Hydrogel Lenses

SiHy (silicone hydrogel) lenses, which are comprised of a mix of hydrophobic silicone and hydrophilic hydrogel monomers, offer the advantage of hyper-oxygen transmissibility, and were developed in appreciation of the need to meet critical oxygen levels. Unlike conventional hydrogel lenses, SiHy lenses are low water, despite their increased oxygen transmission, classifying them as group I or group III lenses. Table 98.2 lists all currently available SiHy lenses. The increased oxygen supply to the corneal surface has reduced the number of hypoxia-related complications, including bulbar and limbal redness, neovascularization, corneal edema, epithelial microcysts, stromal striae, folds and thinning, and endothelial cell changes in density, shape, and size. Although these effects emphasize the importance of increased oxygen supply to the cornea, it is important to note that SiHy lenses have not reduced the overall incidence of contact lens-related inflammatory events or microbial infection. Additionally, corneal infiltrates have been reported to occur more frequently in patients wearing SiHy lenses, presumably due to a combination of factors, including mechanical irritation, increased lens deposition, and bacterial bioburden on the lens surface.

TABLE 98.2
Currently Available Silicone Hydrogel Soft Lenses
Manufacturer Trade Name Lens Material Dk/t Water Content
Bausch & Lomb PureVision 2 Balafilcon A 130 36
Alcon Air Optix Aqua Lotrafilcon B 138 33
Alcon Air Optix Night and Day Aqua Lotrafilcon A 175 24
Alcon Total One Delfilcon A 156 33
Cooper Vision Biofinity Comfilcon A 160 48
Menicon PremiO Asmofilcon A 161 40
Vistakon Acuvue Oasys Senofilcon A 147 38
Vistakon TruEye Narafilcon A 118 46

Rigid Lens Innovations

In the early 1980s, traditional hard lens materials were revamped, and newer rigid gas permeable (RGP) designs emerged. These lenses offered significant oxygen benefit to the cornea and, in addition to higher gas permeability, had improved comfort over PMMA. The advantages of these RGP lenses over soft HEMA lenses included an enhancement in visual acuity due to the innate ability of the RGP to mask both regular and irregular astigmatism; a decrease in the frequency of ocular sequelae from chemically preserved contact lens care solutions, as RGP lenses do not bind solution components as soft lenses do; and increased durability. Further, due to corneal complications such as neovascularization, which is seen with low oxygen-transmissible soft lens wear, particularly following extended wear (EW), high-oxygen RGP lenses that do not cover the entire corneal surface provided a more physiologic alternative for patients wishing to continue lens wear.

Silicone materials have also been used in the manufacturing of RGP lenses. At present, there are several RGP lens materials available with exceedingly high Dk values, among the highest of which are the Boston XO 2 lens with a Dk of 141 (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY), the Fluoroperm 151 lens with a Dk of 151 (CooperVision, Lake Forest, CA), and the Menicon Z lens, which has a Dk of 175 (Menicon, Nagoya, Japan).

Despite the high safety profile of RGP lenses, the contact lens market is still dominated by soft lenses with RGP lenses accounting for only 7% of overall global contact lens fits and SiHy fits and refits outnumbering hydrogel in a ratio of nearly 3.5:1. Soft lens wear carries an increased risk of infection compared to RGP lenses, regardless of the modality of wear. Benchmark studies on the incidence of microbial infection associated with soft lens wear have reported rates of 2.0 cases per 10,000 persons per year for daily wear (DW), and 19.5 per 10,000 persons per year for EW. The primary causative agent in contact lens-related microbial infections of the cornea over four decades remains the pathogenic Gram-negative bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa .

Contact Lenses As Bandage Lenses

Indications for therapeutic use of contact lenses as a bandage include support and protection of the cornea, management of pain, and to promote epithelial healing after abrasions or recurrent corneal erosions, after refractive surgery, after therapeutic interventions involving the ocular surface such as superficial keratectomy or corneal collagen crosslinking, and during hospitalizations for burns or mechanico-thermal trauma. Bandage lenses, which are primarily worn on an extended-wear basis in patients with preexisting epithelial defects, require the patient to be monitored for a host of complications arising from overnight wear, including hypoxia and risk of microbial infection.

Hydrogel and SiHy lenses are the mainstay for short-term bandage or therapeutic use because of ease of fitting, low cost, and inventories commonly kept on hand. With the increasing popularity of SiHys and the benefits of improved corneal physiology, however, SiHy lenses have become the preferred form. Recent studies evaluating the use of SiHys for pain relief, epithelial wound closure, and after refractive surgery report an increase in the rate of reepithelialization with SiHy lenses and decrease in ocular pain. , In a retrospective study examining the efficacy of SiHy lenses worn in a therapeutic modality, 91.6% of patients achieved pain relief and 83.78% demonstrated complete corneal recovery without complications. Although there is no clear recommendation regarding bandage lens design and material, as findings vary between the studies, it seems that the second generation of SiHys containing polyvinyl-pyrrolidone is preferred by patients. The examples of FDA approved disposable contact lenses for postoperative pain relief are Acuvue Oasys and Air Optix Night & Day (see Table 98.2 ). In the presence of an epithelial defect, a lens that ensures full corneal coverage with adequate movement with blink and sufficient oxygen permeability will support epithelium healing. A larger lens is typically more effective in corneas exhibiting high toricity or steeper than average curvature, since higher sagittal depth will stabilize lens fit and reduce excessive lens movement. Poor retention due to lid abnormality or significant corneal irregularity may require use of very-large-diameter bandage lenses. Kontur (Kontur Kontact Lens, Co., Hercules, CA) are 15–24 mm diameter hydrogel (HEMA) lenses offered in a variety of single base curves and bicurve designs. In cases of Boston keratoprosthesis implantation or corneal dellen, a large-diameter hydrogel lens is used to allow for improved surface hydration and prevent corneal melt. ,

There are reports of the use of various therapeutic lenses including scleral lenses and the devices used in prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) treatment for exposure keratitis during acute hospitalization or in outpatient care of persistent corneal epithelial defect. Any large-diameter RGP lens must be cleaned and reinserted daily. In some cases prophylactic antibiotics are used concurrently. Bandage lenses are also used in conjunction with cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive glue for corneal perforations.

Collagen Shields

Collagen shields might also be considered a bandage lens. They are composed of a collagen protein matrix, either porcine or bovine in nature, which will dissolve when placed on the eye. Typical dissolution times for most range from 12 to 72 hours. Shaped like a contact lens, collagen shields have an overall diameter similar in size to a soft lens (14.5–16.0 mm) and a 9-mm base curve. The initial center thickness of the shield ranges from 0.15 to 0.19 mm with a Dk/t of 27. Collagen shields have also been reported to be used as a carrier for transplantation of amniotic epithelial cells to the corneal surface for the treatment of persistent epithelial defects.

Therapeutic Uses for Contact Lenses

Contact lenses can be used on a long-term therapeutic basis to provide relief for a wide range of ocular surface disorders. Therapeutic lenses function to protect the epithelium in instances of inadequate lid or blink function, support epithelial function, reduce desiccation, and aid in pain control. An improvement in visual acuity is not the primary aim of therapeutic contact lenses, but it can be an advantageous “side effect” that is a driver for continued wear. Indications for the use of therapeutic contact lenses, include support of the ocular surface after chemical burns, persistent or recurrent epithelial abnormalities after cancer treatment, lid irregularities, bullous keratopathy, severe ocular surface disease such as keratoconjunctivitis sicca, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease. , , A detailed summary of therapeutic indications for contact lens wear is given in Table 98.3 .

TABLE 98.3
Indications for Therapeutic Bandage Lens Wear
  • Bullous keratopathy

  • Lid abnormalities

  • Ocular surface disease

  • Keratoconjunctivitis sicca

  • Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid

  • Stephens-Johnson syndrome

  • Neurotrophic keratitis

  • Graft-versus-host disease

  • Persistent/recurrent epithelial abnormalities

  • Filamentary keratitis

  • Persistent epithelial defects

  • Recurrent corneal erosions

  • Postinfectious ulcers (herpes, bacteria, fungi)

  • Trichiasis

  • Postoperative

  • PRK/LASIK

  • Delayed epithelial healing

  • Poor wound apposition after PK

  • Corneal collagen crosslinking

  • Trauma

  • Chemical burn

  • Corneal abrasion

  • Corneal perforation

LASIK, Laser in situ keratomileusis; PK, penetrating keratoplasty; PRK, photorefractive keratectomy.

The most common lenses used for therapeutic measures are conventional hydrogel and SiHy lenses, large-diameter hydrogel lenses, and large-diameter RGP lenses. The last decade has brought greater appreciation of the value of large-diameter RGP lenses for treatment of advanced ocular surface disease. These lenses are classified as corneo-scleral, mini-scleral, or scleral based on diameter and characteristics of fit. Use of such lenses was previously limited by the low oxygen transmissibility of the available lens materials and difficulty in manufacturing on a large scale. Scleral lenses made of newer hyper-oxygen-transmitting materials using lathe-cut designs have proven useful in ocular surface disease. , , The advantage of using scleral lenses in severe ocular surface disease derives from the fact that the lenses rest on the sclera and vault over the cornea and limbus, forming an aqueous reservoir that continuously bathes the damaged epithelium ( Fig. 98.1 ). This aqueous buffer protects the eye from the mechanical friction of the eyelid during blinking, and maintains the eye in a well-hydrated environment. Scleral lenses are fitted by using a diagnostic set of preformed lenses and then communicating changes in lens specification to the manufacturing laboratory. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) capabilities have allowed higher degrees of customization, including quadrant specific back surfaces and front surface cylinder correction. Innovations in lens manufacture have allowed for a modernization of the historical molding approach with CAD/CAM design, ocular surface profilometry, where the curvature of the anterior eye surface encompassing the corneo-scleral area is measured and EyePrintPRO impression technology (EyePrint Prosthetics, Lakewood, CO) in which an impression mold of the cornea and scleral is created and then transferred to the manufacturing lathe by high-precision scanning device. Care should be taken when fitting to ensure there is no contact apically or at the limbus, no impingement into the limbal conjunctiva, and no blanching of underlying episcleral blood vessels. Lens suction can be reduced by the incorporation of fluid-ventilated channels to allow for adequate tear exchange.

Fig. 98.1, Schematic of the Boston scleral lens.

PROSE is a treatment approach using large-diameter RGP scleral lens prosthetic devices in which the clinician uses the CAD/CAM system directly to design lenses for the treatment of complex corneal disease. PROSE treatment has been shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective across a broad range of diagnoses including ocular surface disease. , Success with scleral lenses and with PROSE treatment has been specifically reported in ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, atopy, as well as in cases of exposure, lagophthalmos, and limbal stem cell dysfunction in the setting of treatment for cancer. , Therapeutic contact lens wear plays an important role in the management of chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease, with silicone-hydrogel lenses, , scleral lenses, and PROSE treatment demonstrated to improve vision, comfort, and quality of life for these patients.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here