Cemented acetabular revision for the distorted acetabulum with intact columns (type IIA, B, and C defects)


Background

Distortion of the acetabulum is a common finding after the removal of failed acetabular components. Reconstruction of such defects is a necessity for any orthopaedic surgeon performing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures, as the creation of a type II defect during implant removal must always be ruled out. Various techniques exist for reconstructing these defects, and cement in conjunction with donor bone is widely used throughout Europe. Schreurs et al. have promoted this technique and published a successful series with a 20-year clinical follow-up.

Several approaches have been described for revision THA. In the recent two decades, the minimal invasive direct anterior approach (DAA) has become more popular and may also be employed for revision surgery. As our institution has focused on this approach over the past 20 years, we have gathered experience performing THA revision surgeries through the DAA while minimizing muscle trauma. With the use of the DAA, the length of the skin incision can remain under 10 cm.

In this chapter, we describe the use of cement and impaction grafting of type II acetabular defects. Premise: This technique is based on securing a piece of mesh, properly impacting the bone allograft, placing a cage that is stabilized with adjuvant screw fixation, and cementing a cup in the appropriate inclination and version.

Surgical technique

Required equipment

Curved retractors are required for acetabular exposure. Usually, three retractors are placed around the acetabulum. One is superior/anterior at the acetabular rim, retracting the rectus femoris and sartorius muscles anterosuperiorly. The second one is placed medial to the transverse ligament, either pointed against the superior or the inferior horn or the semi-lunate fasciae. A third curved retractor is placed lateral to the acetabular rim. We use a fourth retractor at the dorsal acetabular rim to inferiorly retract the femur with the femoral stem in place. A double-pronged retractor such as a Mueller retractor is preferable in most cases ( Figs. 7.1 and 7.2 ).

• Fig. 7.1, Acetabular Exposure with Curved Retractors and a Mueller Retractor Dorsally. 5

• Fig. 7.2, Placement and Orientation of Retractors are Shown on a Plastic Pelvis. 7

The authors recommend performing this technique on a radiolucent Jackson table with fluoroscopic guidance. This procedure can also be performed with a specialized table.

Based on the literature, fresh frozen allograft bone is the preferred bone graft for this procedure. , However, a morselized bone graft can be augmented with bone substitutes and be impregnated with antibiotics. , This may, however, compromise the mechanical properties of the graft material.

For acetabular reaming, a curved or offset reamer handle should be available. We also recommend an offset impaction device. Those should also have some anterior offset or curvature to allow for soft-tissue preservation ( Fig. 7.3 ).

• Fig. 7.3, Curved Cup Impactor. 5

If an acetabular mesh is utilized, the initial fixation of this mesh should be performed with standard screws. Otherwise, the mesh could violate Köhler’s line and gain access to the pelvis during bone impaction or cup placement.

For central defects, it is sometimes necessary to place a metal mesh centrally to avoid medial migration of bone graft material. Ideally, different dimensions of round preformed meshes should be available at the time of surgery. Alternatively, the desired shape can also be created from a standard flat piece of mesh. If this is necessary, an appropriate pair of scissors should be at hand. If the defect is small and the fascia of the iliac muscle is intact or reinforced by preexisting scar tissue, no further reinforcement is necessary.

The concept of impaction bone grafting includes the use of a cage to augment the cement and contain and stabilize the morselized bone. A multi-layer augmentation is used to reconstruct the bone defect ( Fig. 7.4 ).

• Fig. 7.4, This Picture Shows the Fundamental Principle of Impaction Bone Grafting with Five Distinct Layers. 7

Several ring constructs are available for reconstruction. We recommend using a ring system that has superior and inferior bone contact. This is achieved with either a hook ( Fig. 7.4 ) or a spike ( Fig. 7.5 ).

• Fig. 7.5, Burch-Schneider Ring with a Spike Placed Inside the Ischium. 15

We prefer using a ring with a hook and an additional plate laterally to achieve optimal load distribution.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here