Anterior and Lateral Approaches to the Thoracic Spine


Summary of Key Points

  • Transpedicular approaches can provide excellent access to ventral pathology and provide the option for a partial or complete corpectomy.

  • Minimally invasive transpedicular extracavitary options are increasingly used.

  • Retropleural thoracotomy provides a short surgical approach to the ventral thoracic and thoracolumbar spine and spinal canal.

  • Avoidance of pleural entry reduces postoperative pain and morbidity and obviates the need for a chest tube in most patients.

  • Direct anterior approaches are sparingly used but may be beneficial in certain circumstances; however, they may require a manubriotomy or sternotomy.

Ventral pathology in the thoracic spine presents unique challenges. Mobilization of neural structures in this region significantly increases risk of neurological injury, largely precluding direct posterior approaches anterior to the spinal cord. Anterior, lateral, and posterolateral approaches each have specific advantages and disadvantages that must be weighed, depending on pathology and individual patient characteristics. In this chapter, we will discuss the operative nuances of the transpedicular, transpleural, lateral extracavitary, retropleural, and direct anterior approaches to ventral thoracic pathology ( Fig. 117.1 ).

Fig. 117.1
Ventral approaches to the thoracic spine.

Transpedicular Approach

Overview

The transpedicular approach provides a working channel adjacent to the cord through a posterior midline incision, allowing posterior instrumentation and ventral access without the need for a second incision, repositioning, or retraction of visceral structures. Additional posterior maneuvers, such as osteotomies for deformity correction, may also be performed without repositioning. The necessary working corridor dictates the type of approach and is ultimately determined by the patient’s pathology. Decompression, stabilization, and realignment procedures are all possible through a posterolateral approach. Surgical goals dictate the necessary bony removal, exposure, and overall plan for each procedure.

Operative Planning

For elective cases, consideration must be given to preoperative optimization, including bone quality, nutrition, narcotic use, and smoking status. Preoperative embolization may reduce blood loss, particularly in tumor cases. Surgical adjuncts such as intraoperative advanced imaging, navigation, or vertebroplasty may be useful and should be planned preoperatively. Localization in the thoracic spine can be particularly vexing, and radiographic markers placed preoperatively may save operative time and reduce errors.

Transpedicular decompression destabilizes the spine, mandating instrumentation in nearly all cases. Two levels of bilateral pedicle fixation above and below the vertebrae of interest is typically adequate. Longer fusions may be indicated for cases of poor fixation (such as extensive bony metastases, dysplastic pedicles, or osteoporosis) or biomechanical concerns (i.e., obesity, transitional segments, or deformity/kyphosis).

Surgical Technique

Once intubated, the patient is positioned prone on an open frame table, such as a Jackson, and the head is secured with Gardner–Wells tongs. Somatosensory-evoked potentials and motor-evoked potentials are monitored by the neurophysiology team. Arms may be positioned at the sides or abducted and flexed, as determined by surgeon preference, taking into account the patient’s body habitus and the procedure’s upper instrumented vertebra. Attention must be dedicated to localization, taking advantage of all available landmarks, including skull, sacrum, ribs, and preoperative markers. Radiographically evident pathology, such as a fracture or local deformity, should also be taken into consideration.

Antibiotics are administered, and steroids are administered in cases with preoperative cord compression. Prothrombotic agents, such as tranexamic acid, can help to minimize blood loss. We typically employ a moderate bolus and maintenance dose of 30 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg/h, respectively, unless clinically contraindicated.

Exposure proceeds from a midline incision in a standard subperiosteal fashion, exposing the posterior elements to the tip of transverse processes bilaterally. Care is taken to preserve the integrity of midline structures and facet joints at the proximal and distal junctions. Unless there is an acute need for decompression, our practice is to perform the instrumentation before decompression to afford protection of the cord during screw placement, as well as accommodate any need for temporary rod placement. Pedicle screw placement can be guided by anatomic landmarks or navigated, depending on preference and operating room capability. Typically, the level at which the transpedicular decompression will be performed is not instrumented. Screw placement is confirmed by intraoperative computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopy, or x-rays.

Following confirmation of instrumentation, attention is turned to bony removal. For strictly decompressive procedures, laminectomies are performed at the level of interest and adjacent levels using Leksell rongeurs or a high-speed drill. Inferior facets at the level of interest and the level above are removed using an osteotome or high-speed burr. Superior facets at the level of interest and the level below are removed in similar fashion. A combination of Kerrisons and curettes are then used to complete the removal of the soft tissue elements. Early localization of exiting nerve roots above and below the level of interest facilitates safe bony removal. In the case of epidural tumors and abscess, pathological tissue may be encountered at this stage and may be sampled. The remaining pedicle and transverse process may then be removed using a high-speed burr or Leksell rongeurs until they are flush with the posterior aspect of the vertebral body ( Fig. 117.2A ). Disc spaces above and below should be identified. Soft ventral pathology may be removed at this point with the use of curettes or sharp dissection. If necessary, partial corpectomy may be performed with an osteotome or high-speed burr (see Fig. 117.2B , C ). Anterior decompression should be confirmed with careful palpation ventral to the spinal dura, as well as visual inspection (see Fig. 117.2D ).

Fig. 117.2, Transpedicular decompression. A, Penfield identifying left T10 pedicle partially exposed, with right inferior facetectomies completed. B, An osteotome is used to perform a partial corpectomy following removal of the pedicle. C, A rongeur is then used to remove bone fragments. D, Curettes are used to work ventral to the thecal sac.

The transpedicular approach for stabilization, or placement of anterior column support, typically demands a larger working corridor than that for decompression alone. This mandates a wider bony exposure in anticipation of rib head and lateral vertebral body removal. Up to 5 cm of rib at the level of interest and the level below may be exposed. Bony decompression is performed as in a decompressive procedure, with additional preparation of the anterior column for support placement. Immediately before or after pedicle removal, the lateral aspect of the vertebral body should be exposed subperiosteally. Exposure should be from disc to disc, with soft tissues held out of the way with retractors or soft gauze. Proximal ribs are cut with rib cutters or rongeurs, and the rib head is disarticulated from the vertebral body using a periosteal elevator or osteotome. Discectomy and corpectomy can then be performed using osteotome, high-speed burr, and curette. End plate exposure and corpectomy size are determined by cage dimensions.

Posterior approaches to the ventral thoracic spine for realignment are typically performed to confer flexibility across an otherwise stiff deformity. This frequently mandates complete or near-complete corpectomy, or resection of fusion mass. For this surgical goal, bilateral transpedicular approaches are required, as is removal of the vertebral body or fusion mass to its anterior border. This may be performed safely by first dissecting the lateral vertebral body as anteriorly as feasible, then continuing to dissect anteriorly as the corpectomy is performed bilaterally. The anterior cortex of the body may then be removed with rongeurs, and thin cortical segments fractured in a controlled fashion.

For ventral intradural pathology, linear dural opening midline or paramedian can be used. A trapdoor approach can also be used to gain further lateral access at this point. Following tumor removal, cortical surfaces are decorticated, and allograft can be placed over the decorticated surfaces. Autograft is avoided in the case of infections and malignancies. Antibiotic powder is placed in the wound, along with subfascial drains. The wound is then closed in a standard fashion.

Postoperative Care and Follow-Up

Patients are typically admitted for floor-level care. If there is concern for transient neurological deficits or fluid shifts, admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) may be warranted for maintaining mean arterial pressure and other hemodynamic parameters. Otherwise, early mobilization is encouraged, as well as monitoring for acceptable subfascial drain outputs. Standing long cassette x-rays are obtained for baseline alignment ( Fig. 117.3 ). Chest x-rays may be obtained if there is concern for pneumocephalus during the case. If present, conservative management with serial imaging until it resolves often suffices. Chest tubes may be required for clinically significant or large, persistent pockets of air.

Fig. 117.3, Preoperative anteroposterior (AP) ( A ) and lateral ( B ) and postoperative AP ( C ) and lateral ( D ) x-rays demonstrating transpedicular decompression separation surgery with pedicle screw fixation three segments above and two below augmented with cement ( D ), with preserved sagittal balance and thoracic kyphosis.

Costotransversectomy and Lateral Extracavitary

At times, the ventral view provided by the transpedicular approach may be inadequate to accomplish the goals of the surgery. Further removal of the inferior rib, along with the transverse process and pedicle as described in the transpedicular approach, provides a more lateral starting point to facilitate a more ventral trajectory. Both the costotransversectomy and lateral extracavitary (LEA) are posterolateral approaches, differing primarily in the extent of rib removal; costotransversectomy involves approximately 4 to 6 cm of rib removal, whereas LEA removes greater than 6 cm.

Costotransversectomy is typically performed in the prone position with a linear or curvilinear incision centered on midline. Exposure is carried out similarly to the transpedicular approach, although more extensive rostrocaudal dissection may be needed. A Cobb elevator can be used for subperiosteal dissection of the ventral and lateral rib surfaces, being careful to protect associated neurovascular bundles. Leksell rongeurs can then be used to remove exposed sections of rib.

The LEA is particularly useful when circumferential spinal exposure is needed, as a multicompartment exposure is obtained. This is particular useful in large dumbbell tumors, especially for tumors with intradural and anterior paraspinal components present, or for en bloc resection of eccentric intraosseous lesions. Multilevel thoracic corpectomies may also be more amenable to LEA than costotransversectomy. Patients are positioned prone or three-quarter prone. A hockey stick incision centered on midline with an approximately 8- to 10-cm horizontal ipsilateral limb is often helpful to allow muscular dissection lateral to the erector spinae, but midline and paramedian incisions may be used as well. In total, 6 to 12 cm of rib are exposed and removed, as described earlier. Intercostal nerves and vessels may be mobilized with loop retractors, or sacrificed, depending on the segment and surgical indication. Malleable retractors may be used to retract pleura to further increase visualization.

Ventral vertebral exposure with these techniques has the benefit of avoiding pleural violation while providing access to both anterior and posterior column instrumentation for structural support ( Fig. 117.4 ). However, the LEA requires an extensive and often bloody paraspinal muscle and foraminal dissection. Additionally, intercostal nerves are often sacrificed to optimize exposure, which may result in a painful neuroma or abdominal wall muscle weakness at lower thoracic and thoracolumbar levels. The foraminal dissection may inadvertently occlude a medullary vessel, which may risk spinal cord infarction. Finally, despite the extensive dissection, direct ventral spinal canal visualization extends only to the midline and provides insufficient exposure to place a lateral spinal implant in the majority of cases. A cadaveric study by Kshettry et al. comparing visualization in posterolateral approaches found that LEA only provided a significant improvement over costotransversectomy for T7‒T10, whereas costotransversectomy significantly increased visualization from T3‒T12, when compared with transpedicular approaches.

Fig. 117.4, Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging ( A ) and computed tomography ( B ) demonstrating epidural abscess and pathological fracture from discitis/osteomyelitis centered at T5. Post-operative anteroposterior ( C ) and lateral ( D ) x-rays following costotransversectomy and placement of expandable cage after two-level corpectomy.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here