What Medications Are Effective in Preventing and Relieving Constipation in the Setting of Opioid Use?


Introduction and Scope of the Problem

Constipation resulting from opioid use, commonly referred to as opioid-related constipation, opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, or opioid-induced constipation, is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients, especially those with advanced illness. The prevalence of constipation from all causes, including opioid-induced constipation, in hospitalized patients with cancer ranges from 10% to 70%, with more than 50% of patients reporting constipation on admission to hospice. It is estimated that among patients on long-term opioid therapy for pain management, 15% to 90% will develop constipation. Moreover, studies suggest fewer than half of patients find effective relief from current treatment options, including prescription and over-the-counter laxatives and stool softeners. Inadequately managed constipation can lead to decline in functional performance, nutritional intake, socialization, and quality of life. Health care usage increases as patients seek treatment in office settings and hospital emergency departments. Unlike other side effects of opioid medications, such as nausea and sedation, tolerance to the constipation-related side effects of opioid medication develops very slowly or not at all. Patients with opioid-induced constipation may present with a range of symptoms, such as hard, dry stools; straining; incomplete evacuation; abdominal distension; rectal pain; anorexia; nausea and vomiting; and agitation and/or confusion. This may lead to complications such as hemorrhoid formation, fecal impaction with obstipation, overflow incontinence, and life-threatening bowel obstruction ( Table 18.1 ). Patients may elect to forego opioid therapy to avoid these adverse effects. Expert opinion supports prevention as the cornerstone of management of opioid-induced constipation, so initiating laxative medications concomitantly when a patient is starting an opioid is advisable.

Table 18.1
Manifestations of Opioid-Induced Constipation
Primary Symptoms Secondary Symptoms
Dry, hard stool Gastroesophageal reflux
Small bowel movements Anorexia
Decrease in stool frequency Nausea and vomiting
Change in flatus Urinary retention
Straining Interference with medication absorption and digestion
Incomplete defecation Fecal impaction
Abdominal distension Anal fissures
Abdominal bloating Overflow incontinence
Obstruction

Relevant Pathophysiology

Opioid receptors are located throughout the peripheral and central nervous systems. Of the three subtypes—mu, delta, and kappa—the mu receptors are most involved in opioid-induced constipation. Opioids induce constipation through peripheral and central mechanisms. Exogenous opioid binds to mu receptors located in the small intestine and proximal colon and inhibit the release of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine, which in turn interrupts peristalsis and delays transit throughout the small bowel. At the same time, opioids reduce intestinal secretions normally induced by prostaglandins and vasoactive intestinal polypeptides by binding to receptors in the submucosal plexus. This in turn leads to an increase in fluid and electrolyte absorption from the small and large intestines, resulting in dry, hard stools that are difficult to pass. Opioids also increase anal sphincter tone, reducing the urge to defecate by central effects ( Table 18.2 ).

Table 18.2
Pathophysiology of Opioid-Induced Constipation
Physiological Change Result
Inhibition of release of acetylcholine from myenteric plexus in small intestine
  • Relaxation of longitudinal muscles in small intestine and colon

  • Increased intestinal smooth muscle tone

  • Decrease in peristalsis

Increase in segmental contraction Prolonged transit of intestinal contents and increase in time for reabsorption of water and electrolytes from the bowel
Decrease in gastric, intestinal, biliary, and pancreatic secretion Reduction in digestion and absorption of micronutrients and macronutrients
  • Increased tone at ileocecal valve and decrease in defecation reflex

  • Decreased sensitivity to rectal sensation

Impaired distal evacuation

Summary of Evidence Regarding Treatment Recommendations

Evaluation

Considerable variability exists in the meaning of the word constipation to patients and health care practitioners. One consideration is stool frequency, which normally varies from once per week to several times per day. Other symptoms include straining with bowel movements, passage of small, hard stools, or a sense that the bowel has not completely evacuated. To better characterize constipation, consensus groups have made attempts to create a standard definition. The Rome IV criteria help to better define functional constipation and take into account bowel movement frequency with associated discomfort. The Bowel Function Index is a reliable and valid measure that evaluates the impact and severity of opioid-induced constipation among patient populations with and without cancer. When considering opioid-induced constipation, any recent change in bowel habits reported by the patient warrants further inquiry.

Taking an adequate history and performing a physical examination are essential first steps in evaluating a patient with constipation, including opioid-induced constipation. The history should detail frequency and consistency of stools (both current and baseline before opioid use); whether or not evacuation was satisfactory; associated factors such as nausea, vomiting, and obstipation; history of laxative use; activity level; diet; blood in the stool; prescription and over-the-counter medications; comorbid conditions; and any other related symptoms, such as pain with defecation. Clinicians should also consider and mitigate other contributors to opioid-induced constipation whenever possible (e.g., discontinuation of other constipating medications) ( Table 18.3 ).

Table 18.3
Contributors to Constipation in Patients in Palliative Care
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Tumors
Rectal prolapse
Anal fissure
Stricture
Hemorrhoids
Drugs
Analgesics (e.g., opioids, tramadol)
Anticholinergics (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines, antispasmodics)
Antihypertensives (e.g., calcium channel blockers, β-adrenergic antagonists)
Antiarrhythmics (e.g., amiodarone)
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antiemetics (e.g., ondansetron)
Anticonvulsants (e.g., carbamazepine)
Chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., vinca alkaloids, alkylating agents)
Antidepressants
Diuretics (loop, thiazides)
Neuroleptics
Antiparkinsonian drugs (e.g., benztropine, dopamine agonists)
Bile acid sequestrants
Antacids (aluminum or calcium containing)
Iron supplementation
Calcium supplementation
Neurological Disorders
Peripheral neuropathies
Spinal cord lesions
Parkinson’s disease
Cerebrovascular disease
Multiple sclerosis
Metabolic and Electrolyte Abnormalities
Hypercalcemia
Hypokalemia
Uremia
Hypothyroidism
Diabetes mellitus
Hypoparathyroidism
Other
Decreased mobility
Poor fluid intake
Inadequate dietary fiber
Emotional stress

Physical examination should focus on abdominal distension, presence or absence of bowel sounds, evaluation for masses, tenderness to palpation, and, when indicated, rectal examination for fecal impaction, perianal fissures, and ulcerations. The rectum may be empty if hard or impacted stool is higher up in the bowel. In addition, patients presenting with impaction may pass loose stool or develop fecal seepage and stool incontinence that may be mistaken for normal bowel movements (often referred to as overflow fecal incontinence). Constipation may be the first sign of spinal cord compression, and patients who are at risk should undergo a complete neurological assessment, including evaluation for saddle anesthesia and rectal tone. Some patients may benefit from blood work to detect contributing metabolic abnormalities, radiological imaging such as abdominal radiography, computed tomography scans, and spinal magnetic resonance imaging, depending on the clinical presentation of symptoms of constipation and goals of care.

Prevention

The goal of laxative therapy is to achieve comfortable defecation based on a frequency determined in collaboration with the patient, with most patients benefiting from one nonforced bowel movement every 1 to 2 days. Tolerance does not develop to constipating effects of opioids, therefore prophylactic treatment with stool softeners and laxatives is considered the standard of care for as long as opioids are prescribed. Other preventive measures such as increasing fluid intake and dietary soluble fiber, scheduled toileting, and regular physical activity should be incorporated when feasible but may not be possible or appropriate in persons with advanced illness.

Pharmacological Treatment

No studies have been reported indicating superiority of one conventional laxative versus another in the management of opioid-induced constipation. Current recommendations are largely based on a few studies including a small number of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Selection of laxatives depends on the nature of the stools, causes of constipation, and acceptability to the patient, as well as the cost and availability of the agent. Treatment must be individualized because each agent has considerable side effects that can limit tolerability. Rectal interventions may be uncomfortable and embarrassing for a patient, therefore oral therapies are usually considered first-line treatment. Expert opinion supports prevention as the cornerstone of the management of opioid-induced constipation, which starts with a scheduled osmotic agent or stimulant. An escalation of laxatives is recommended every 2 days if constipation persists, using a stepwise approach as depicted in Fig. 18.1 . Current evidence does not identify a linear relationship between opioid dose and amount of laxative required; however, as opioid doses are increased, additional laxatives are usually necessary to manage opioid-induced constipation. The following is a description of commonly used classes of medications for management of opioid-induced constipation (see also Table 18.4 ).

Fig. 18.1, Stepwise laxative regimen for managing opioid-induced constipation.

Table 18.4
Commonly Used Laxatives for Opioid-Induced Constipation
Group Action Agents Onset of Action Side Effects/Cautions
Bulking agents Increase fecal bulk, retain fluid in gut lumen Psyllium seed, bran, methylcellulose Days
  • Bloating, flatulence, abdominal pain

  • Risk of exacerbating constipation if inadequate fluid intake

  • Generally not recommended in patients with advanced illness

Osmotics Draw and maintain water within gut lumen, increase fluid secretion in small bowel Magnesium sulfate (e.g., Milk of Magnesia, magnesium citrate) 1–3 h
  • Abdominal cramping, watery stools, dehydration, hypermagnesemia, hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia

  • Not recommended in patients with cardiac or renal disease

Lactulose 24–48 h Bloating, flatulence, colic, sweet taste, hypokalemia, hypernatremia, lactic acidosis, acid-base disturbance
Sorbitol 24–48 h Abdominal cramping, bloating, flatulence, sweet taste
Polyethylene glycol (e.g., MiraLAX) 0.5–1 h Nausea, abdominal cramping, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, fecal incontinence
Stimulants Alter intestinal permeability, stimulate myenteric plexus to induce peristalsis Anthraquinones (e.g., senna, cascara) 6–12 h Abdominal cramping, colic, melanosis with chronic use
Bisacodyl 6–12 h Abdominal cramping, electrolyte imbalance
Surfactants Detergents, lubricate and soften stools Docusate sodium 12–72 h Limited efficacy, not recommended as solo agent
Suppositories Reflex evacuation through direct stimulation Glycerin 0.25–1 h Rectal irritation, ineffective if feces are located more proximal in colon
Bisacodyl 0.25–1 h Rectal irritation, ineffective if feces are located more proximal in colon
Enemas Draw water into lumen Saline, sodium phosphate 0.5–1 h
  • Dehydration, hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia

  • Not recommended in patients with renal disease

Distension, facilitating peristalsis Tap water, soapsuds, mineral oil 0.5–1 h
  • Repeated tap water enemas may lead to fluid and electrolyte abnormalities

  • Soapsuds have been associated with chemical colitis

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here