Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Constipation resulting from opioid use, commonly referred to as opioid-related constipation, opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, or opioid-induced constipation, is one of the most distressing symptoms experienced by patients, especially those with advanced illness. The prevalence of constipation from all causes, including opioid-induced constipation, in hospitalized patients with cancer ranges from 10% to 70%, with more than 50% of patients reporting constipation on admission to hospice. It is estimated that among patients on long-term opioid therapy for pain management, 15% to 90% will develop constipation. Moreover, studies suggest fewer than half of patients find effective relief from current treatment options, including prescription and over-the-counter laxatives and stool softeners. Inadequately managed constipation can lead to decline in functional performance, nutritional intake, socialization, and quality of life. Health care usage increases as patients seek treatment in office settings and hospital emergency departments. Unlike other side effects of opioid medications, such as nausea and sedation, tolerance to the constipation-related side effects of opioid medication develops very slowly or not at all. Patients with opioid-induced constipation may present with a range of symptoms, such as hard, dry stools; straining; incomplete evacuation; abdominal distension; rectal pain; anorexia; nausea and vomiting; and agitation and/or confusion. This may lead to complications such as hemorrhoid formation, fecal impaction with obstipation, overflow incontinence, and life-threatening bowel obstruction ( Table 18.1 ). Patients may elect to forego opioid therapy to avoid these adverse effects. Expert opinion supports prevention as the cornerstone of management of opioid-induced constipation, so initiating laxative medications concomitantly when a patient is starting an opioid is advisable.
Primary Symptoms | Secondary Symptoms |
---|---|
Dry, hard stool | Gastroesophageal reflux |
Small bowel movements | Anorexia |
Decrease in stool frequency | Nausea and vomiting |
Change in flatus | Urinary retention |
Straining | Interference with medication absorption and digestion |
Incomplete defecation | Fecal impaction |
Abdominal distension | Anal fissures |
Abdominal bloating | Overflow incontinence |
Obstruction |
Opioid receptors are located throughout the peripheral and central nervous systems. Of the three subtypes—mu, delta, and kappa—the mu receptors are most involved in opioid-induced constipation. Opioids induce constipation through peripheral and central mechanisms. Exogenous opioid binds to mu receptors located in the small intestine and proximal colon and inhibit the release of neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine, which in turn interrupts peristalsis and delays transit throughout the small bowel. At the same time, opioids reduce intestinal secretions normally induced by prostaglandins and vasoactive intestinal polypeptides by binding to receptors in the submucosal plexus. This in turn leads to an increase in fluid and electrolyte absorption from the small and large intestines, resulting in dry, hard stools that are difficult to pass. Opioids also increase anal sphincter tone, reducing the urge to defecate by central effects ( Table 18.2 ).
Physiological Change | Result |
---|---|
Inhibition of release of acetylcholine from myenteric plexus in small intestine |
|
Increase in segmental contraction | Prolonged transit of intestinal contents and increase in time for reabsorption of water and electrolytes from the bowel |
Decrease in gastric, intestinal, biliary, and pancreatic secretion | Reduction in digestion and absorption of micronutrients and macronutrients |
|
Impaired distal evacuation |
Considerable variability exists in the meaning of the word constipation to patients and health care practitioners. One consideration is stool frequency, which normally varies from once per week to several times per day. Other symptoms include straining with bowel movements, passage of small, hard stools, or a sense that the bowel has not completely evacuated. To better characterize constipation, consensus groups have made attempts to create a standard definition. The Rome IV criteria help to better define functional constipation and take into account bowel movement frequency with associated discomfort. The Bowel Function Index is a reliable and valid measure that evaluates the impact and severity of opioid-induced constipation among patient populations with and without cancer. When considering opioid-induced constipation, any recent change in bowel habits reported by the patient warrants further inquiry.
Taking an adequate history and performing a physical examination are essential first steps in evaluating a patient with constipation, including opioid-induced constipation. The history should detail frequency and consistency of stools (both current and baseline before opioid use); whether or not evacuation was satisfactory; associated factors such as nausea, vomiting, and obstipation; history of laxative use; activity level; diet; blood in the stool; prescription and over-the-counter medications; comorbid conditions; and any other related symptoms, such as pain with defecation. Clinicians should also consider and mitigate other contributors to opioid-induced constipation whenever possible (e.g., discontinuation of other constipating medications) ( Table 18.3 ).
Gastrointestinal Disorders |
Tumors |
Rectal prolapse |
Anal fissure |
Stricture |
Hemorrhoids |
Drugs |
Analgesics (e.g., opioids, tramadol) |
Anticholinergics (e.g., tricyclic antidepressants, antihistamines, antispasmodics) |
Antihypertensives (e.g., calcium channel blockers, β-adrenergic antagonists) |
Antiarrhythmics (e.g., amiodarone) |
5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antiemetics (e.g., ondansetron) |
Anticonvulsants (e.g., carbamazepine) |
Chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., vinca alkaloids, alkylating agents) |
Antidepressants |
Diuretics (loop, thiazides) |
Neuroleptics |
Antiparkinsonian drugs (e.g., benztropine, dopamine agonists) |
Bile acid sequestrants |
Antacids (aluminum or calcium containing) |
Iron supplementation |
Calcium supplementation |
Neurological Disorders |
Peripheral neuropathies |
Spinal cord lesions |
Parkinson’s disease |
Cerebrovascular disease |
Multiple sclerosis |
Metabolic and Electrolyte Abnormalities |
Hypercalcemia |
Hypokalemia |
Uremia |
Hypothyroidism |
Diabetes mellitus |
Hypoparathyroidism |
Other |
Decreased mobility |
Poor fluid intake |
Inadequate dietary fiber |
Emotional stress |
Physical examination should focus on abdominal distension, presence or absence of bowel sounds, evaluation for masses, tenderness to palpation, and, when indicated, rectal examination for fecal impaction, perianal fissures, and ulcerations. The rectum may be empty if hard or impacted stool is higher up in the bowel. In addition, patients presenting with impaction may pass loose stool or develop fecal seepage and stool incontinence that may be mistaken for normal bowel movements (often referred to as overflow fecal incontinence). Constipation may be the first sign of spinal cord compression, and patients who are at risk should undergo a complete neurological assessment, including evaluation for saddle anesthesia and rectal tone. Some patients may benefit from blood work to detect contributing metabolic abnormalities, radiological imaging such as abdominal radiography, computed tomography scans, and spinal magnetic resonance imaging, depending on the clinical presentation of symptoms of constipation and goals of care.
The goal of laxative therapy is to achieve comfortable defecation based on a frequency determined in collaboration with the patient, with most patients benefiting from one nonforced bowel movement every 1 to 2 days. Tolerance does not develop to constipating effects of opioids, therefore prophylactic treatment with stool softeners and laxatives is considered the standard of care for as long as opioids are prescribed. Other preventive measures such as increasing fluid intake and dietary soluble fiber, scheduled toileting, and regular physical activity should be incorporated when feasible but may not be possible or appropriate in persons with advanced illness.
No studies have been reported indicating superiority of one conventional laxative versus another in the management of opioid-induced constipation. Current recommendations are largely based on a few studies including a small number of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Selection of laxatives depends on the nature of the stools, causes of constipation, and acceptability to the patient, as well as the cost and availability of the agent. Treatment must be individualized because each agent has considerable side effects that can limit tolerability. Rectal interventions may be uncomfortable and embarrassing for a patient, therefore oral therapies are usually considered first-line treatment. Expert opinion supports prevention as the cornerstone of the management of opioid-induced constipation, which starts with a scheduled osmotic agent or stimulant. An escalation of laxatives is recommended every 2 days if constipation persists, using a stepwise approach as depicted in Fig. 18.1 . Current evidence does not identify a linear relationship between opioid dose and amount of laxative required; however, as opioid doses are increased, additional laxatives are usually necessary to manage opioid-induced constipation. The following is a description of commonly used classes of medications for management of opioid-induced constipation (see also Table 18.4 ).
Group | Action | Agents | Onset of Action | Side Effects/Cautions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bulking agents | Increase fecal bulk, retain fluid in gut lumen | Psyllium seed, bran, methylcellulose | Days |
|
Osmotics | Draw and maintain water within gut lumen, increase fluid secretion in small bowel | Magnesium sulfate (e.g., Milk of Magnesia, magnesium citrate) | 1–3 h |
|
Lactulose | 24–48 h | Bloating, flatulence, colic, sweet taste, hypokalemia, hypernatremia, lactic acidosis, acid-base disturbance | ||
Sorbitol | 24–48 h | Abdominal cramping, bloating, flatulence, sweet taste | ||
Polyethylene glycol (e.g., MiraLAX) | 0.5–1 h | Nausea, abdominal cramping, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, fecal incontinence | ||
Stimulants | Alter intestinal permeability, stimulate myenteric plexus to induce peristalsis | Anthraquinones (e.g., senna, cascara) | 6–12 h | Abdominal cramping, colic, melanosis with chronic use |
Bisacodyl | 6–12 h | Abdominal cramping, electrolyte imbalance | ||
Surfactants | Detergents, lubricate and soften stools | Docusate sodium | 12–72 h | Limited efficacy, not recommended as solo agent |
Suppositories | Reflex evacuation through direct stimulation | Glycerin | 0.25–1 h | Rectal irritation, ineffective if feces are located more proximal in colon |
Bisacodyl | 0.25–1 h | Rectal irritation, ineffective if feces are located more proximal in colon | ||
Enemas | Draw water into lumen | Saline, sodium phosphate | 0.5–1 h |
|
Distension, facilitating peristalsis | Tap water, soapsuds, mineral oil | 0.5–1 h |
|
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here