Treatment and Management of Muscular Dystrophies


Muscular dystrophies have long been recognized as heterogeneous inherited disorders, characterized by progressive skeletal muscle degeneration, weakness, and dystrophic changes in muscle biopsy. These diseases are known to have autosomal dominant, recessive, or X-linked inheritance. Clinical observations initially led to classification into six groups: Duchenne like, Emery-Dreifuss type, limb-girdle type, facioscapulohumeral peroneal type, distal myopathies, and oculopharyngeal type ( ). The expanding genetic and molecular understanding of the muscular dystrophies has further complicated their classification. An updated classification system for these disorders is shown in Table 20.1 .

Table 20.1
Pathophysiological Classification of Muscular Dystrophies
Disease Locus Gene Mode of Inheritance
Limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) caused by sarcolemma or cytosolic protein defects
Duchenne/Becker MD Xp21 Dystrophin XR
LGMD 1A (myofibrillar myopathy) 5q31 Myotilin AD
LGMD 1B (Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy) 1q21 Lamin A/C AD
LGMD 1C (rippling muscle disease) 3p25 Caveolin AD
LGMD 1D (D1 DNAJB6-related LGMD) 7q36 DNAJB6 AD
LGMD 1E (myofibrillar myopathy) 6q23 Desmin AD
LGMD 1F (D2 TNP03-related LGMD) 7q32 Transportin-3 AD
LGMD 1G (D3 HNRNPDL-related LGMD) 2q37 HNRDL AD
LGMD 1H
LGMD 1L (D4 calpain-3–related LGMD)
3p23-25
15q15.1
Unknown—not confirmed
Calpain-3
AD
LGMD 2A (R1 calpain-3–related LGMD) 15q15.1 Calpain-3 AR
LGMD 2B (R2 dysferlin–related LGMD) 2p13.1 Dysferlin AR
LGMD 2C (R5 γ-sarcoglycan–related LGMD) 13q12 Gamma-sarcoglycan AR
LGMD 2D (R3 α-sarcoglycan–related LGMD) 17q21 Alpha-sarcoglycan AR
LGMD 2E (R4 β-sarcoglycan–related LGMD) 4q12 Beta-sarcoglycan AR
LGMD 2F (R6 δ-sarcoglycan–related LGMD 5q33 Delta-sarcoglycan AR
LGMD 2G (R7-telethonin–related LGMD) 17q11.2 Telethonin (TCAP) AR
LGMD 2H (R8 TRIM 32– related LGMD) 9q31-q33 Tripartite motif-containing 32 (TRIM32) AR
LGMD 2I (R9-FKRP–related LGMD) 13q13.3 Fukutin-related protein (FKRP) AR
LGMD 2J (R10-Titin–related LGMD) 2q31 Titin AR/AD
LGMD 2K (R11-POMT1–related LGMD) 9q34.1 Protein-O-mannosyltranseferase (POMT1) AR
LGMD 2L (R12-anoctamin 5–related LGMD) 11p14.3 ANO5 AR
LGMD 2M (R13-fukutin–related LGMD) 9q31 Fukutin AR
LGMD 2N (R14 POMT2–related LGMD)
LGMD 2O (R15 POMGNT1–related LGMD)
LGMD 2P (R16 α-dystrolycan–related LGMD)
LGMD 2Q (R17 plectin–related LGMD)
LGMD 2R (myofibrillar myopathy)
LGMD 2S (R18 TRAPPC11–related LGMD)
LGMD 2T (R19 GMPPB–related LGMD)
LGMD 2U (R20 ISPD–related LGMD)
LGMD 2V (Pompe disease)
LGMD 2W (PINCH-2–related myopathy)
LGMD 2X (BVES-related myopathy)
LGMD 2Y (TOR1AIP1-related myopathy)
LGMD 2Z
14q24
1p32
3p21
8q24
2q35
4q35
3p21
7p21
17q25
2q14
6p21
3q13,33
6q21
POMT2
POMGnT1
DAG1
Plectin 1f
Desmin
TRAPPC11
GMPPB
ISPD
GAA
LIMS2
BVES
POGLUT1
POPDC1
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
AR
Congenital muscular dystrophy (CMD) secondary to glycosylation disorder
Fukuyama MD (syndromic) 9q31 Fukutin AR
Muscle-eye-brain disease (syndromic) 1p34.1 Protein O-linked mannose b1,2-Nacetylglucosaminyltransferase (POMGnT1) AR
Walker-Warburg syndrome (syndromic) 9q34.1 Protein-O-mannosyltranseferase (POMT1) AR
MDC 1A (merosin-negative CMD) 6q22-23 Laminin-a2 (merosin)
MDC 1B (merosin-positive CMD) 1q42 ? AR
MDC 1C 19q13.3 Fukutin-related protein (FKRP) AR
MDC 1D 22q12.3-q13.1 LARGE AR
Other congenital muscular dystrophies
CMD with early rigid spine (RSS) 1p36 Selenoprotein N-1 AR
CMD with ITGA7 mutations 12q Integrin α7 AR
Ullrich syndrome/Bethlem myopathy 21q22.3 (A1, A2)
2q37 (A3)
Collagen VI α1, α2, and α3 AD
Muscular dystrophies secondary to nuclear envelope defects
Emery-Dreifuss MD X1 Xq28 Emerin XR
Emery-Dreifuss MD X2 q21.2 Lamin A/C AD
Emery-Dreifuss MD X3 1q21.2 Lamin A/C AR
Emery-Dreifuss MD X4 6q25 Synaptic nuclear envelope protein 1 (SYNE1; Nesprin-1) AD
Emery-Dreifuss MD X5 14q23 SYNE2 AD
Emery-Dreifuss MD X6
Emery-Dreifuss MD X7?
Xq26
3p25.1
Four-and-a-half-LIM protein 1 (FHL1)
LUMA (transmembrane protein 43)
XR
AR
Muscular dystrophies secondary to RNA metabolism defects
Myotonic dystrophy 1 (DM1) 19q13.3 Myotonic dystrophy-associated protein kinase (DMPK) AD
Myotonic dystrophy 2 (DM2) 3q21 Zinc finger, nucleic acid binding protein (ZNF9) AD
Other muscular dystrophies of unknown mechanism
Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) 3q21 FRG-1 (FSH region gene 1) AD
Oculopharyngeal MD 14q11.2-q13 PABPN1 AD
LGMD table: Disease names in parentheses: New nomenclature proposed from 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre Workshop.
AD , Autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; MD , muscular dystrophy; MDC , muscular dystrophy congenita; X , X-linked recessive.

The underlying molecular defects responsible for these disorders are found throughout the cellular structure, including extracellular matrix (ECM) structural proteins and glycosylation enzymes, transmembrane- and sarcolemma-associated proteins, cytoplasmatic proteases, and cytoplasmic proteins associated with organelles and sarcomeres and nuclear membrane proteins. These diseases have provided a window to a better understanding of sarcolemmal organization and the underlying muscle biology responsible for the structure and maintenance of normal muscle cell function. The relationships between these proteins are complex; the function of each of the defective proteins, including the most investigated one, dystrophin, is not entirely known. Structural, enzymatic, and signaling dysfunctions provide the basis for the pathophysiology that has been associated with these disorders. Fig. 20.1 shows a current depiction of the muscle membrane as well as other areas of the muscle fiber associated with muscular dystrophies.

Fig. 20.1
Different proteins of sarcolemma and other areas of the muscle fiber associated with muscular dystrophy. EDMD , Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy; FCMD , Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy; FKRP , fukutin-related protein; ITGA7 , integrin, alpha7; LGMD , limb-girdle muscular dystrophy; LGMD2M , limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 2M; MEBD , muscle-eye-brain disease; nNOS , neuronal nitric oxide synthase; POMGnT1 , protein O–linked mannose β1,2- N -acetylglucosaminyltransferase; POMT , protein O–mannosyltransferase; TRIM , tripartite motif; WWS , Walker-Warburg syndrome.

Dystrophinopathies

Dystrophinopathies are a group of dystrophies resulting from mutations in the dystrophin ( DMD ) gene, located on the short arm of the X chromosome in the Xp21 region ( ). Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common dystrophinopathy and represents a complete absence of the subsarcolemmal protein dystrophin. Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), which is rarer, involves a decrease in the quantity or quality of the dystrophin protein. This gives rise to a milder disease with variable severity and time of clinical onset. Other phenotypes associated with mutations in the dystrophin gene include DMD- associated dilated cardiomyopathy and in the milder spectrum of the disease asymptomatic elevation of creatine phosphokinase (CK), muscle cramps, and myoglobinuria ( ).

Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies

The clinical and pathologic features of DMD were first described in 1851 by Edward Meryon, an English physician, in a communication about eight boys in three British families who had the disease. Several years later, in 1868, the French neurologist Guillaume-Benjamin Duchenne described the same syndrome in detail, and it ultimately would bear his name. Several other meticulous descriptions of the disease can be found in the early literature.

The incidence of DMD has been estimated at approximately in 3300 male births ( ; ). The most common mode of inheritance is X-linked recessive, but approximately 30% of cases are spontaneous mutations with no demonstrable family history ( ; ; ; ). Males are primarily affected, but females may manifest symptoms of DMD if they also exhibit skewed X-inactivation, wherein the abnormal X chromosome is expressed in an excessively abnormal proportion ( ; ; ; ).

Molecular Pathogenesis

The DMD gene, located in chromosome Xp21.2-p21.1, consists of 86 exons (including seven promoters linked to unique first exons). The gene, which spans a genetic distance of more than 2.5 million base pairs ( ), is the largest isolated human gene. The most common mutation responsible for DMD and BMD is a deletion spanning one or multiple exons. Such deletions account for 60%–70% of all DMD cases and 80%–85% of BMD cases. Point mutations are responsible for around 26% of DMD cases and 13% of BMD cases. Exonic duplications account for 10% to 15% of all DMD cases and 5% to 10% of BMD cases. Subexonic insertions, deletions, splice mutations, and missense mutations account for the rest of the cases ( ; ).

Deletions can occur almost anywhere in the DMD gene, but two hotspots have been identified. The most commonly mutated region includes exons 45–55, with the genomic breakpoint (i.e., the endpoint of where the deletions actually occurs) lying within intron 44. The second region includes exons 2–19, with genomic breakpoints commonly found in introns 2 and 7 ( ; ; ; ). The other 40% of cases result from small mutations (point mutations resulting in frame-shift or nonsense mutations) or duplications. There is a great deal of variability between the size and type of mutations, how they affect transcription, and the clinical phenotype of the disease. The Leiden database ( http://www.dmd.nl/ ) Clinvar and OMIN ( ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ) are useful resources for phenotype/genotype correlation in cases in which genetic testing and phenotype do not appear to be clearly correlated.

More than 90% of boys with DMD have an absence of dystrophin corresponding to an “out-of-frame” mutation that disrupts normal dystrophin transcription ( ). These mutations cause a premature stop codon and early termination of mRNA transcription. As a result, an unstable RNA is produced that undergoes rapid decay, leading to the production of nearly undetectable concentrations of truncated protein. If the mutation is one that does not stop transcription, an “in-frame” deletion, the BMD phenotype occurs, with abnormal dystrophin protein ( ). This reading frame hypothesis holds for more than 90% of cases and is commonly used both to confirm diagnosis of dystrophinopathies and to differentiate between DMD and BMD. Exceptions occur in approximately 10% of patients and might be higher in patients with BMD (Kesari et al., 2008).

Out-of-frame deletions affecting exons 3–7, 5–7, or 3–6 or downstream at exons 51, 49–50, 47–52, 44, or 45 can result in a milder BMD phenotype. The most common underlying explanation for the presence of at least some dystrophin in these patients is a process called exon skipping , which occurs via alternative splicing ( ; ). In these BMD patients, the carboxy-terminus is always preserved ( ). The involved exons are generally thought to encode noncritical areas of the protein so that when they are skipped, a shortened but still functional dystrophin protein is produced. Exon skipping is also the underlying mechanism for the revertant fibers (a few scattered muscle fibers showing dystrophin staining in muscle biopsies) seen in approximately 50% of DMD boys ( ). The limited expression of dystrophin results in a slower progression of muscle weakness compared with the usual Duchenne phenotype ( ; ; ; ). This process has been therefore an appealing target for therapy in dystrophinopathies, because pharmacologic induction of exon skipping in DMD patients should produce some quantity of dystrophin and may alleviate the severity of the disease (see discussion of Treatment and Management in this chapter).

Pathophysiology

Dystrophin Protein

The normal DMD gene creates a 14-kb dystrophin mRNA that encodes dystrophin, a 427-kDa protein. Dystrophin localizes to the subsarcolemmal region in skeletal and cardiac muscle and composes 0.002% of total muscle protein ( ; ; ). Dystrophin binds to the cytoskeletal actin and to the cytoplasmic tail of the transmembrane dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC) protein β-dystroglycan, and through this to α-sarcoglycan, thus forming a link from the cytoskeleton to the ECM (see Fig. 20.1 ). The dystrophin protein is also found in brain, smooth muscle, and retina.

Primary and Secondary (Downstream) Events

Muscle cell death (by apoptosis and necrosis) in the muscular dystrophies is conditional on endogenous biochemical mechanisms and reflects a propensity that varies between muscles and changes with age ( Fig. 20.2 ) ( ). Although dystrophin deficiency is the primary cause of DMD, multiple secondary pathways are responsible for the progression of muscle necrosis, the abnormal fibrosis, and the failure of regeneration that results in a progressively worsening clinical status. The literature is rich in evidence supporting oxidative radical damage to myofibers ( ; ; ; ), inflammation ( ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ), abnormal calcium homeostasis ( ; ; ; ; ; ), myonuclear apoptosis ( ; , ; ; ; ; ), abnormal fibrosis, and failure of regeneration ( ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ). The following is a brief summary of the current understanding of how these processes occur.

Fig. 20.2, Events in the pathogenesis of muscle necrosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. ADP , Adenosine diphosphate; ATP , adenosine triphosphate; bFGF , basic fibroblast growth factor; DHGs , dehydrogenases; DHPR , dihydropyridine receptor; ECM , extracellular matrix; MM-CK , MM fraction of creatine kinase; NADH , nicotinamide adenosine dinucelotide (reduced); NOS , nitric oxide synthase; SERCA , sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic Ca2+ ATPase; SR , sarcoplasmic reticulum; TCA , tricarboxylic acid cycle; TNF , tumor necrosis factor.

Mechanical Membrane Fragility

Dystrophin is a link between the intracellular cytoskeleton and the ECM. The carboxy-terminal of dystrophin is attached to the sarcolemma, the surface membrane of striated muscle cells ( ; ; ; ), binding to β-dystroglycan ( ) and through this to other dystrophin-associated glycoproteins and to α-dystroglycan, which links the sarcolemma to the ECM ( ). When dystrophin is not present, the disconnection of contractile proteins from β-dystroglycan results in loss of β- and α-dystroglycan and the DGC from the sarcolemma. This disruption results in membrane fragility and abnormal permeability, particularly to calcium ions.

Abnormal Permeability to Calcium and Chronic Increase in Intracellular Calcium

Cumulative evidence points to elevated intracellular Ca 2+ homeostasis being a cause or facilitator to the development of muscle weakness in muscular dystrophies (Andersson et al., 2012; Goonasekera et al., 2011; Pal et al., 2014). Abnormal Ca 2+ handling may be related to direct dystrophin regulation of mechanosensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) channels ( ; ), as well as abnormal intracellular Ca 2+ cycling ( ; ; ).

The deregulation of Ca 2+ channels is seen in abnormal function of voltage-insensitive or “stretch-activated” Ca 2+ channels, a subfamily of the TRP channels ( ). These stretch-activated channels are abnormally active under mechanical stimulation in myotubes of mdx mice (murine model of DMD), resulting in an increase in intracellular calcium ( ; ; ).

The L-type, voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels also appear to be abnormal in the absence of dystrophin; it has been shown that the Ca 2+ currents in response to an action potential are much smaller in mdx mice than in normal controls. A disrupted direct or indirect linkage of dystrophin with these channels may be crucial for proper excitation-contraction coupling, initiating Ca 2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum.

The abnormal intracellular Ca 2+ levels result in abnormal activation of Ca 2+ -activated proteases (i.e., calpain) with subsequent abnormal degradation of intracellular proteins, which probably contributes to the abnormal functioning of the calcium leak channels ( ). Cumulative preclinical evidence shows that chronic eccentric exercise worsens the abnormalities in calcium homeostasis in mdx mice ( ), which supports the clinical observation that eccentric exercises in DMD are deleterious and exacerbate muscle weakness ( ; ). Calcium also accumulates in mitochondria, contributing to cell dysfunction by affecting energy production (Dubinin et al., 2020; ).

Abnormal Immunologic Response

Dystrophic skeletal muscle is characterized by a persistent inflammatory response, with muscle degeneration, regeneration, and fibrosis. The lack of dystrophin in myofibers leads to contraction-induced membrane damage with release of cytoplasmic contents and self-sustaining stimulation of innate immunity. Proinflammatory cytokines induce recruitment of T and B cells and generation of an adaptive immune response in the muscle milieu. This proinflammatory microenvironment is often superimposed on the neutrophil and macrophage infiltrations induced by successive courses of myofiber degeneration and regeneration. In contrast to the full resolution of a single bout of inflammation and repair of normal muscle, dystrophin-deficient muscle loses the bout effect. Neighboring fibers or groups of fibers enter the necrotic stage at different times in the 2-week degeneration/regeneration cycle (asynchronous regeneration), thus sustaining a chronic inflammatory state, which, in turn, creates a more proinflammatory environment with activation of innate immune pathways, and evidence of increased antigen presentation (Dadgar et al., 2014; ).

Many of these immune response pathways are known to be blocked by the glucocorticoids prednisone and deflazacort, drugs that have been shown to slow progression of the disease, improve muscle strength and motor function, and prolong survival. Other therapeutic immunomodulatory approaches are being developed to alter the natural course of the disease and could be an adjunct treatment for other therapies such as gene and exon skipping therapies.

Abnormal Signaling Functions

Mounting evidence shows that the dystroglycan complex has important muscle cell signaling functions, and its integrity is essential for muscle cell viability ( ). These functions include transmembrane signaling (through β-dystroglycan), docking of signal transduction molecules (i.e., caveolin-3), and interaction with or regulation of other transmembrane complexes (i.e., integrins). When the dystroglycan complex is disassociated from the sarcolemma, there is a disruption of the cell signaling involved in regulating apoptosis ( ) and in the metabolism of reactive oxygen species ( ; ; ; ; ; ).

Another abnormality of cell signaling is likely the underlying explanation for the “vascular” theory of DMD pathogenesis, supported in the past by morphologic evidence of muscle fiber group necrosis occurring very early in the disease, presumably secondary to ischemia. Dystrophin absence results in mislocalization and reduction of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) in dystrophic muscle, affecting smooth vessel vasodilation in response to alpha-adrenergic stimuli in exercise ( ), resulting in muscle ischemia ( ). Dystrophin-associated α-syntrophin appears to be essential for the membrane localization of nNOS ( ).

Abnormal Fibrosis and Muscle Regeneration

The chronic inflammation in DMD leads to a shift in balance from myogenic pathways resulting in successful muscle regeneration toward fibrogenic pathways, culminating in the loss of muscle fibers and their replacement with fatty-fibrotic matrix. The gradual accumulation of fibrosis in skeletal muscle dysregulates contractile function and is directly related to loss of motor function in DMD. Fibrosis also becomes a physical barrier that prevents normal blood flow to the muscle and the delivery of gene therapy or antisense-oligonucleotides to the muscle fiber. Thus, understanding the fibrotic process in DMD has become important to identify new therapeutic targets that could complement anti-inflammatory as well as dystrophin delivery therapies ( ).

Fibrosis (the excessive deposition of endomysial and perimysial ECM) is a known secondary phenomenon to chronic muscle inflammation and fiber degeneration in DMD ( ). Many signaling pathways modulate fibrotic progression in dystrophic skeletal muscle, and these provide important therapeutic targets to reduce fibrosis in DMD and other muscular dystrophies. The primary profibrotic signal is transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) (Ceco et al., 2013). High expression of TGFβ is evident in dystrophic muscle ( ) and in serum samples of individuals with DMD ( ). TGFβ is stored in the ECM as a complex with latent TGFβ-binding proteins (LTBPs). Activation of TGFβ requires its release from the complex by proteases into the ECM. Polymorphisms in the LTBPs have been associated with worse prognosis and increased fibrosis in DMD (Flanigan et al., 2013). Thus, blocking the cleavage of LTBP4 is a potential therapeutic target for preventing the excessive release of active TGFβ ( ). Once TGFβ is released, it can act through its canonical pathway of binding to the TGFβ receptor to mediate SMAD signaling, which upon nuclear entry leads to activation of a profibrotic transcriptional program that includes the production of collagen I (Ceco et al., 2013). Noncanonical pathways are also activated, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways and c-abl that, in turn, enhance transcription of profibrotic signals, including TGFβ itself, as part of the positive feedback in fibrosis ( ). Other identified therapeutic targets include TGFβ downstream profibrotic pathways, like the renin-angiotensin system (Sun et al., 2009) and growth factors, like CTGC, found to be upregulated in dystrophic animal models and patients (Sun et al., 2008).

Interestingly, the amount of fibrosis in DMD seems disproportionate to the clinical severity in the earlier stages of the disease. Observation of this fact spurred the idea that fibrosis may also occur independent from muscle necrosis, degeneration, and failed regeneration. Evidence suggests that both enhanced fibrinogenesis and decreased fibrinolysis ( ) are implicated in the development of muscle fibrosis in DMD. Serum from DMD patients also have increase basic fibroblast growth factor, a skeletal muscle cytoplasmic polypeptide that colocalized with dystrophin in the muscle membrane. Leaking of this growth regulator that stimulates connective tissue synthesis, induces satellite cell (SC) proliferation, and suppresses myogenic differentiation could contribute to early fibrogenesis ( ).

Dystrophin and Its Role in Satellite Cells

The cycles of segmental degeneration and regeneration of the dystrophin-deficient muscle fibers trigger SC recruitment for regeneration. During regeneration of dystrophic muscles, decisions regarding SC fate are regulated by intrinsic mechanisms and extrinsic signals (Almada et al., 2016). Dystrophin deficiency in SCs affects cell polarity and self-renewal. This results in asymmetric cell division, which in turn alters normal muscle repair mechanisms (Chang, Chevalier, & Rudniki, 2016). Exhaustion of SC pool has been a concern in DMD, as it was thought that the chronicity of this degeneration-regeneration process would result in SC pool depletion over time and result in failed regeneration (Heslop et al., 2000). However, it is known that dystrophic SCs are initially increased in muscle biopsies of young DMD patients when compared with matched normal controls (Bankole et al., 2013). Recent preclinical studies in different murine models of muscular dystrophy have shown that dystrophic mice retain their SC pool. Furthermore, the number of activated SCs is elevated and the dystrophic muscle retains its ability to form new muscle fibers, compatible with active regeneration and pool maintenance. However, this regenerative process is incomplete, with a possible defect in the maturation characteristics that could be determinant to the dysfunction of these fibers (Ribeiro et al., 2019). These new findings support efforts to improve late muscle regeneration as therapeutic approaches, even in advance disease.

Diagnosis and Evaluation

Clinical Characteristics

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Neuromuscular Involvement

Muscle fiber necrosis with elevated muscle calcium levels and a high serum creatine kinase (CK) enzyme level can be found in infancy in patients with DMD ( ), but the clinical manifestations are typically not recognized until at least age 3 years. This discrepancy represents a potential therapeutic window in which early interventions could theoretically prevent or delay the onset of symptoms. Walking often begins later than in normal children, and affected boys experience more falling than expected. Gait abnormality often becomes apparent by age 3 to 4 years, leading to clinical evaluation. Muscle weakness presents initially in neck flexor muscles, with power being less than antigravity. As a result, the child turns on his or her side when getting up from a supine position on the floor, which is the initial sign of the Gowers maneuver. Hypertrophy of calf muscles becomes prominent by age 3 or 4 years ( Fig. 20.3 ). Hypertrophy of other muscles, including the vastus lateralis, infraspinatus, deltoid, and less frequently the gluteus maximus, triceps, and masseter muscles, may also develop. Muscle mass is usually decreased in later stages in the pectoral, peroneal, and anterior tibial muscles.

Fig. 20.3, A child with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Notice winging of the scapulae (A), hypertrophy of the calf muscles, and prominent lordosis (B).

Because of hip girdle weakness, untreated patients exhibit the Gowers sign by age 5 or 6 years. The patient assumes a locked-leg, buttocks-first position followed by pushing off the floor with the hands, literally pushing the trunk erect by bracing the arms against the anterior thighs. Patients also tend to rock from side to side when walking, producing the waddling gait that is typical in older boys with the disease. Climbing stairs also becomes difficult with disease progression, and eventually distal muscles of the arms and legs become weak.

Accelerated deterioration in strength and balance often results from intercurrent disease or surgically induced immobilization. A wheelchair is required when ambulation is no longer possible, typically near the end of the first decade in untreated DMD and about 3 to 10 years later in steroid-treated DMD. After loss of ambulation, contractures become more pronounced in the lower extremities; they also soon involve the shoulders, and kyphoscoliosis may develop. Cardiac and respiratory involvement often occurs in this later disease stage as well.

Adolescent patients manifest increasing weakness and are unable to perform routine daily tasks with their arms, hands, and fingers. The head may progressively flex forward as extensor neck muscles lose strength. Lower facial muscles may be involved in the advanced phase.

Respiratory Involvement

Pulmonary function becomes compromised because of weakness of intercostal and diaphragmatic muscles and severe scoliosis. It occurs later in the disease in nonambulatory boys and is the primary cause of mortality in DMD. Muscle weakness affects all aspects of lung function, including mucociliary clearance, gas exchange at rest and during exercise, and respiratory control during wakefulness and sleep ( ). It is important to recognize that DMD is often associated with sleep disordered breathing, which could be asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic. Respiratory complications and their treatment are discussed in greater detail in Chapter 2 .

Cardiac Involvement

Boys with DMD are at risk for cardiomyopathy, especially if they have deletion of exons 48 to 53 ( ). Mild degrees of cardiac compromise in DMD may occur in up to 95% of boys ( ). Chronic heart failure may affect up to 50% ( ; ). Sudden cardiac failure can occur, especially during adolescence. In one series of 19 patients, autopsies revealed that 84% had demonstrable cardiac involvement ( ). Cardiac complications and their management are discussed further in Chapter 3 .

Neuropsychological Involvement

Overall, the IQ curve in boys with DMD is shifted to the left ( ). The mean IQ score in one study was 83 (range, 46 to 134). Other studies have not been able to prove a difference in overall IQ ( ; ; ; ). Recently, it has become evident that certain cognitive areas (i.e., verbal memory and executive function) are more affected than others in DMD ( ). The severity of central nervous system impairment increases with mutations at the 3′ end of the gene, which lead to cumulative loss of several dystrophin-gene products (Dp260, Dp140, Dp116, and Dp71) encoded by distinct internal promoters and normally expressed in the nervous system in a cell-specific manner ( ; Taylor et al., 2010).

Other Organ Involvement

Rarely, gastrointestinal tract involvement associated with smooth muscle dysfunction causes megacolon, volvulus, abdominal cramping, and malabsorption ( ).

Clinical Characteristics of Becker Muscular Dystrophy

BMD is present in 3 to 6 per 100,000 male births ( ). The onset of weakness is later than in the Duchenne type, usually seen after age 7 years and often in the second decade; the disease is also marked by lordosis, calf hypertrophy, and other features of DMD of a milder phenotype ( Fig. 20.4 ). The course is prolonged into adulthood, often with a normal life span. Ambulation is typically maintained beyond age 30 years. CK level is usually between 2000 and 20,000 U/L but may be in the normal range for mildly affected males. Because these patients can be asymptomatic for decades, they commonly are misdiagnosed as having liver disorder when routine laboratory values show elevated transaminases (aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), which are elevated in parallel with serum CK levels. At times, the BMD diagnosis is made after many years of gastrointestinal follow-up for elevated transaminases, until someone thinks of measuring the CK, which comes back extremely elevated. Pseudohypertrophy, proximal hip weakness resulting in the Gowers sign, and electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities associated with DMD are also common to BMD.

Fig. 20.4, An adult patient with Becker muscular dystrophy. (A) Patient’s front; (B) patient’s back. Notice the prominent calf muscles.

Chromosome Xp21 Microdeletion Syndromes

The Xp21 microdeletion syndromes are a series of syndromes that include DMD, Aland Island eye disease, adrenal hypoplasia, glycerol kinase deficiency, retinitis pigmentosa ( RP3 ), mental retardation ( MRX1 ), and ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency. The combination of these conditions led to the discovery of the DMD gene on Xp21 ( ).

Female Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy D Carriers and Manifesting Carriers

Carrier females are heterozygous with a normal DMD gene on one X chromosome and a mutant gene on the other. More than 90% of female carriers are asymptomatic. However, variable degrees of muscle weakness may be seen with skewed X-inactivation, in which more than half of the mutant X chromosomes are operant in muscle cells. Such cells are prone to degeneration. If a large number of abnormal muscle fibers are present in a given muscle, that muscle may display weakness. The degree of strength from one muscle to another may vary from normal strength to significant weakness.

Signs and symptoms of female dystrophinopathy include muscle weakness, myopathic findings on muscle biopsies, elevated CK levels, and partial absence of dystrophin in muscle ( ). Symptoms manifest in about one fifth of DMD carriers ( ). The diagnosis should be considered in women with elevated CK levels and muscle weakness, even in the absence of a positive family history for DMD ( ).

DMD carriers appear to have an increased incidence of cardiomyopathy. Studies have shown an incidence of asymptomatic cardiomyopathy ranging from 8% to 48% in adult DMD carriers ( ; ; ) and from 0% to 15% in DMD carrier girls under age 16 years ( ).

Clinical Laboratory Tests

In DMD, serum CK is greatly elevated, typically from 10,000 to 30,000 U/L, early in the course of the disease. Gaps in the sarcolemma allow efflux of the enzyme into the circulation. Serum CK levels can vary greatly with activity and decrease as muscle mass is lost with disease progression. There is no correlation between the serum CK level and clinical severity in DMD and use of CK levels as a surrogate marker of treatment response is not well supported. Because of the leakage of intracellular muscle proteins, other muscle isoenzymes also increase in the circulation. These include aldolase, lactate dehydrogenase, ALT, and, to a lesser degree, AST.

Genetic Testing

Dystrophin gene deletion and duplication testing is usually the first confirmatory test given that approximately 70% of individuals with DMD have a single-exon or multiexon deletion or duplication in the dystrophin gene. The most cost-effective techniques currently used are multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification or array comparative genome hybridization, which are followed by full gene sequencing if the initial results are negative. In many countries, these techniques are being replaced by next generation sequencing ( ). If genetic testing does not confirm the clinical diagnosis of DMD, then a muscle biopsy is recommended. Given that the genotype and phenotype correlation is approximately 89%, a muscle biopsy might also be necessary when the genetic findings predict a phenotype that is not consistent with the clinical presentation. Genetic testing is also important for genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis, and eligibility for mutation specific therapies.

Muscle Biopsy

Histology of DMD muscle demonstrates fiber size variation, degenerating and regenerating fibers, clusters of smaller fibers, endomysial fibrosis, and a few scattered lymphocytes. Large, opaque fibers are prominent on modified Gomori-Wheatley trichrome staining ( Fig. 20.5 ). As the disease progresses, muscle fibers are lost and replaced with fat and connective tissue. Fiber typing with adenosine triphosphatase histochemistry is less distinct than expected. Oxidative histochemistry is maintained. On electron microscopy, gaps in the sarcolemma with preservation of the basement lamina are seen in nonnecrotic fibers ( Fig. 20.6 ).

Fig. 20.5, (A) A trichrome-stained section of a muscle biopsy from a patient with Duchenne muscular dystrophy showing necrosis, opaque fibers, mildly increased endomysial connective tissue, and variation in muscle fiber size (×200). (B) Higher magnification (×400) showing fiber atrophy, hypertrophy and necrosis, and interstitial infiltrates of mononuclear cells.

Fig. 20.6, Muscle biopsy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy showing staining for dystrophin with absence of the protein (A) compared with control muscle (B) showing normal staining for dystrophin and muscle atrophy. (C) An area of the muscle biopsy showing scattered revertant fibers that stain positive for dystrophin (×200).

Absence of immunoreactivity for dystrophin with monoclonal antibodies against the C-terminal, rod domain, and N-terminal is necessary for accurate diagnosis of DMD ( Fig. 20.7 ). Quantitative dystrophin analysis by immunoblot is more accurate for diagnosis than immunostaining, with dystrophin value being less than 5% in DMD patients. Over the last decade, it has become crucial to accurately quantify dystrophin in muscle biopsies, as this is the primary biological endpoint of clinical trials aiming to induce functional dystrophin expression. Reliable and reproducible methods for quantification of dystrophin protein expression at the sarcolemma have been developed, including semiquantitative nested reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Taqman quantitative (q) RT-PCR assay ( ), high-throughput immunofluorescence analysis method ( ), as well as by mass spectroscopy ( ).

Fig. 20.7, Electromicrograph of a specimen from a 6-year-old child with Duchenne muscular dystrophy revealing sarcolemma (cell wall) disruption ( arrows ) with redundant membranes (×10,800).

Histologic findings in BMD are similar to but less pronounced than those in DMD. The sarcolemmal gaps are not as readily seen. Using monoclonal antibodies directed to separate regions of dystrophin, immunoreactivity over the sarcolemma shows a variety of staining patterns, ranging from intact to absent, with one or more antibodies ( ).

Treatment and Management

In DMD and BMD, multidisciplinary care involving physicians (neurologists, physiatrists, orthopedic surgeons, endocrinologists, cardiologists, and pulmonary medicine specialists), physical and occupational therapists, nutritionists, exercise physiologists, genetic counselors, and social workers is important for the overall well-being of the child and the family.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here