The Liver’s Response to Injury : Inflammation and Fibrosis


Abbreviations

Bambi

bone morphogenetic protein and activin membrane-bound inhibitor

CCL

CC chemokine ligand

CCR

CC chemokine receptor

CXCL

CXC chemokine ligand

CX3CR

CX3C chemokine receptor

DAMP

damage-associated molecular pattern

ECM

extracellular matrix

HSC

hepatic stellate cell

IFN

interferon

IL

interleukin

IRAK1

interleukin 1 receptor–associated kinase 1

JAK

Janus kinase

KLF6

Krüppel-like factor 6

LPS

lipopolysaccharide

mRNA

messenger RNA

MMP

matrix metalloproteinase

MYD88

myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88

NF-κB

nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

NK

natural killer

NKT

natural killer T

PDGF

platelet-derived growth factor

STAT

signal transducer and activator of transcription

TGF

transforming growth factor

TIR

toll/interleukin-1 receptor

TLR

toll-like receptor

TNF

tumor necrosis factor

TRAF6

tumor necrosis factor receptor–associated factor 6

TRAIL

tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand

TRIF

TIR domain–containing adapter-inducing interferon β

Introduction

Inflammation is a part of the immune response to infection and trauma, and under physiologic conditions is designed to facilitate wound healing. The traditional inflammatory response is characterized as a complex reaction to an injuring agent that involves the loss of vascular wall integrity, activation of leukocytes and their extravasations, and release of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β. The liver functions to eliminate toxins and pathogens from the circulation, and has developed a unique mechanism of immunosurveillance. To avoid unnecessary activation of the immune system, the liver has a local immune response followed by induction of peripheral tolerance toward the antigen. When stressful agents such as pathogens or environmental insults challenge the liver for extended periods and their elimination is not possible, then inflammation follows.

Hepatic fibrosis and then cirrhosis commonly follows chronic inflammation. Sustained suppression of inflammatory activity by elimination of the etiologic agent or by dampening of the immune response can halt and even reverse the fibrotic process. The success of current treatments of chronic liver inflammation in achieving antifibrotic effects can be measured by prolonged survival and possibly a reduced occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus hepatic inflammation is one driver of fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatic Inflammation as a Driver of Hepatic Fibrosis

Liver inflammation is commonly associated with hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis. These forms of liver cell injury initiate a sequence of events that is independent of the etiologic cause of the inflammation and provide signals for the development of liver fibrosis. Apoptotic hepatocyte bodies can activate quiescent hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and Kupffer cells, and these activated cell populations in turn promote inflammation and fibrogenesis. The activated HSCs also increase the production of inflammatory chemokines, the expression of adhesion molecules, and the presentation of antigens to T lymphocytes and natural killer T (NKT) cells. These enhanced inflammation and immune responses can promote hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis and thereby strengthen and perpetuate the stimuli for fibrogenesis.

Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β 1 and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) activate HSCs for transformation into myofibroblasts. Myofibroblasts are characterized immunophenotypically by a spindle or stellate shape, pale eosinophilic cytoplasm, and expression of abundant pericellular matrix and extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, such as vimentin, alpha smooth muscle actin, nonmuscle myosin, fibronectin, and collagen type I.

There are several potential sources of hepatic myofibroblasts in the liver. HSCs and portal fibroblasts are the liver-resident mesenchymal cells. They are the major source of myofibroblasts in fibrotic liver. On the other hand, bone marrow–derived fibrocytes and mesenchymal progenitor cells may be recruited to the injured liver, where they contribute to inflammation and fibrosis, but are a minor component of the liver myofibroblast population. Primary cell culture studies have clearly demonstrated that cholangiocytes and hepatocytes undergo a change in the phenotype and gene expression toward a mesenchymal cell, especially after incubation with TGF-β, which is the cytokine most closely associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. However, more recent reports provide strong evidence against epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in the liver as a source of myofibroblasts. These studies have shown that genetic labeling of hepatocytes (with albumin-Cre mice), cholangiocytes (with cytokeratin 19-Cre mice) and their precursors did not result in generation of myofibroblasts in vivo. The origin of myofibroblasts may reflect the nature of the liver injury and the microenvironment within the liver ( Fig. 5-1 ).

Fig. 5-1, Origin of myofibroblasts in fibrotic liver in mice.

Recent studies have also identified macrophages as critical regulators of fibrosis. As with myofibroblasts, these cells are derived from either resident tissue populations, such as Kupffer cells, or from bone marrow immigrants. Studies now suggest that the pathogenesis of fibrosis is tightly regulated by distinct macrophage populations that exert unique functional activities throughout the initiation, maintenance, and resolution phases of fibrosis. Activated macrophages can not only release chemokines that stimulate HSCs, but can also release reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and chemotactic proteins that promote hepatocyte injury and enhance the inflammatory responses. The resultant oxidative stress on the hepatocytes can damage DNA, induce apoptosis, promote the expression of proinflammatory genes, enhance fibrogenesis, and possibly trigger malignant transformation.

The net consequence of these diverse interactive cellular and molecular mechanisms is to extend the tissue injury and enhance the accumulation of the ECM. The accumulation of collagens I and IV, procollagen III, and elastin occurs early in liver injury, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that are directed at the different types of collagen are activated to degrade the depositions and maintain stability of the matrix. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases are also expressed to counterregulate the degradation process. Maturation of the collagen matrix depends mainly on lysyl oxidases, which cross-link the collagen fibrils and increase the resistance to degradation.

Although the inflammatory process is geared toward tissue repair, healing, and disposal of infectious agents, its effects are widespread and potentially harmful. It is this conflicting aspect of inflammation that is frequently referred to as a double-edged sword or the friend or foe? nature of inflammation. Chronic inflammation can exist as a result of the failure of host mechanisms to terminate an acute inflammation. Unlike the acute setting, where the cellular players are predominantly neutrophils, chronic inflammatory infiltrates are typified by mononuclear cells such as macrophages, lymphocytes, and plasma cells. The persistence of these cells can result in further tissue damage and trigger a wound-healing response in the form of angiogenesis and fibrosis. Hepatic inflammation initiates fibrogenesis by promoting hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis, sustains fibrogenesis by activating HSCs and Kupffer cells, and maintains itself by the actions of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines that influence the trafficking of inflammatory and immune cells within the liver.

Cell Types That Participate in Inflammation and Fibrosis

Hepatocytes

Hepatocyte necrosis and apoptosis, triggered by viral infection, steatosis, and alcohol or drug toxicity, are the main drivers of chronic liver inflammation and fibrosis. Apoptotic bodies derived from the damaged hepatocytes can promote secretion of various proinflammatory and fibrogenic cytokines from macrophages and activate quiescent HSCs directly. The signals released from dying hepatocytes are termed damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and more than 25 candidate molecules have been identified. One is mammalian DNA, which is usually sequestered inside cells but can activate HSCs via toll-like receptor (TLR) 9. In addition to up-regulating TGF-β and collagen 1 messenger RNA (mRNA), activation of TLR9 inhibited HSC chemotaxis, allowing the cells to localize to sites of hepatocyte death. Hepatocyte cell death also increases local adenosine concentrations, which act via the A2A receptor to induce a profibrogenic and antichemotactic phenotype.

Hepatic Stellate Cells

ECM deposition is a key step in the development of liver fibrosis, and HSCs are the main cell type responsible for this process. On the initial basis of morphologic features and subsequent confirmation by molecular and biochemical techniques, it has been established that HSCs undergo differentiation from a quiescent phenotype to a myofibroblast phenotype characterized by matrix remodeling, chemotaxis, and contraction. As it is clear that resolution of fibrosis occurs in experimental and clinical models, it is important to understand the fate of differentiated HSCs, with dedifferentiation into a quiescent state or death as the main options. In addition to the development of a more profibrogenic phenotype, phagocytosis of apoptotic bodies makes HSCs resistant to Fas ligand–induced and TRAIL-induced apoptosis via JAK/STAT-dependent and Akt/NF-κB-dependent pathways.

A previously established concept is that the myofibroblasts undergo apoptosis on the basis of the documented senescence and apoptosis of some activated HSCs during regression of fibrosis. Recently, genetic cell fate mapping was used to demonstrate an alternative pathway in which myofibroblasts revert to a quiescent-like phenotype in CCl 4 -induced liver injury and experimental alcoholic liver disease. With these two models of hepatotoxic induced liver fibrosis, it was demonstrated that approximately half of the myofibroblasts escape apoptosis during regression of liver fibrosis, down-regulate fibrogenic genes ( COL1A1 , COL1A2 , ACTA2 , TIMP1 , and TGFBR1 ), and acquire a phenotype similar to, but distinct from, that of quiescent HSCs. Inactivated HSCs acquire a novel phenotype. In particular, inactivated HSCs more rapidly reactivate into myofibroblasts in response to fibrogenic stimuli and more effectively contribute to liver fibrosis. Inactivation of HSCs is associated with reexpression of the lipogenic genes PPARG , INSIG1 , and CREBBP . Inactivation of the HSCs terminates fibrogenesis and facilitates regression of the extracellular matrix.

A battery of chemokines are expressed by activated HSCs, including CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 2, CCL5, CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 2, CCL21, CXCL8, CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL12, and CX3C chemokine ligand (CX3CL) 3, which recruit neutrophils, macrophages/monocytes, natural killer (NK)/NKT cells, dendritic cells, and T cells, thereby establishing their role in immune cell infiltration. HSCs regulate inflammation within the fibrotic liver through three interrelated mechanisms.

  • 1.

    Cell surface expression of chemokines and/or delivery of chemokines to endothelial cells promotes lymphocyte adhesion and subsequent migration, and activated HSCs specifically promote intercellular adhesion molecule 1–dependent and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1–dependent adhesion and migration.

  • 2.

    Increased expression of chemokines by HSCs establishes a chemoattractant gradient between the peripheral blood and the liver, thus driving immune cell migration into the liver.

  • 3.

    HSC interaction with immune cells has a direct role in promoting/inhibiting their maturation within the liver.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here