The Failed Rotator Cuff Repair: Evaluation and Surgical Management


Introduction

Failed rotator cuff repair includes patients with recurrent tears; however, it also includes those patients who have not achieved adequate pain control or improved functional outcomes following the index procedure. There are intrinsic and extrinsic factors that contribute to persistent symptoms. The intrinsic factors are specific to the rotator cuff itself and a recurrent tear. The extrinsic factors include persistent biceps symptoms, symptomatic acromioclavicular (AC) joint arthritis, glenohumeral arthritis, unrecognized instability, and persistent subcoracoid impingement.

Procedure

Arthroscopic or open rotator cuff repair involves the reattachment of the tendinous rotator cuff complex to the appropriate tuberosity insertion. However, it also includes managing any other additional pathology (i.e., AC joint arthritis, any causes of impingement, biceps pathology, adhesive capsulitis, glenohumeral arthritis, implant complications, poor bone quality, and so forth) not addressed at the index procedure.

Patient History

  • History of traumatic event

  • Gradual or insidious onset

  • Pain that interferes with or disrupts sleep

  • Pain with overhead activities

  • Weakness

  • Lateral shoulder pain

  • Comorbidities: tobacco use, diabetes, inflammatory arthritis with immune modulators

Patient Examination

  • Inspection:

    • Location of prior scars

    • Atrophy (deltoid, supraspinatus fossa, infraspinatus fossa) ( Fig. 33.1 )

      FIG. 33.1, Supraspinatus atrophy (arrow) .

    • Deformity of biceps (Popeye deformity)

  • Palpation:

    • Pain with palpation of the AC joint or biceps tendon

  • Distal neurovascular exam

  • Active and passive range of motion (ROM): discrepancies between the two

  • Strength (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation)

  • Special testing (see Figs. 33.2-33.8 for detailed description):

    FIG. 33.2, Neer impingement sign: Stabilize the scapula with one hand on the top of the shoulder and elevate the arm into forward flexion. 79% Sensitive, 53% specific.

    FIG. 33.3, Hawkins-Kennedy impingement sign: Flex both the elbow and shoulder to 90 degrees and internally rotate the shoulder. 79% Sensitive, 59% specific

    FIG. 33.4, Lift-off test: subscapularis: Place dorsum of hand on the small of the back and lift the hand away from the body. 17.6% Sensitive, 100% specific

    FIG. 33.5, Belly press test: subscapularis: Hand flat on abdomen while keeping the elbow in the front plane of the body Positive test if elbow falls beneath the frontal plane Difficult to do if there is a loss of internal rotation 40% Sensitive, 97.9% specific

    FIG. 33.6, Speed test: Patient forward flexes the shoulder 60 degrees with elbow in extension and palm up with resistance. Anterior shoulder pain suggests biceps complex/superior labrum (superior labrum tear from anterior to posterior) pathology. 32% Sensitive, 75% specific.

    FIG. 33.7, Yergason test: Elbow flexed 90 degrees at the patient’s side; hold hand and provide resistance against supination. Positive test is anterior shoulder pain suggesting biceps pathology. 43% Sensitive, 79% specific.

    FIG. 33.8, Active compression test: Top: Flex shoulder 90 degrees and adduct the shoulder across the body, thumb down. Patient is to resist downward force (shoulder internal rotation, forearm pronated). Bottom: Repeat with thumb up (shoulder external rotation, forearm supinated). Positive test result is pain with thumb down, alleviated with palm up. Suggests biceps labral anchor lesion (superior labrum tear from anterior to posterior)

  • ROM of the cervical spine with Spurling test

Imaging

  • Standard four x-ray views: Grashey anteroposterior (AP) view, outlet view, Zanca view, and axillary view ( Fig. 33.9 and 33.10 ).

    FIG. 33.9, Anteroposterior Grashey view: Define: Patient is rotated 40 degrees toward the affected side. Beam is directed to the glenohumeral joint. Evaluate: glenohumeral joint space, greater tuberosity for bony changes, proximal humeral head migration, location and types of implants used in prior repair.

    FIG. 33.10, Outlet

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) arthrogram: high-field magnet preferred to open low-field magnet.

  • Computed tomographic arthrogram: if MR is contraindicated.

  • Plain MRI is acceptable if gadolinium is contraindicated.

  • Evaluate for hardware position, integrity of rotator cuff repair, additional pathology (i.e., edema at the AC joint, subcoracoid impingement, biceps instability, superior labral pathology), and atrophy using the Goutallier classification.

Treatment Options: Nonoperative and Operative

  • Living with the symptoms.

  • Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

  • Corticosteroid injection.

  • Formal physical therapy/home exercise program.

  • Revision rotator cuff repair: technique based on surgeon preference.

    • Single- versus double-row: greater tuberosity surface area availability, bone loss, cuff mobility, and necessity of removal of old implants must all be considered.

  • With or without biceps tenodesis or tenotomy.

  • Decompression, anterior acromioplasty (if indicated): look at the coracoacromial ligament. In our practice if it looks normal, we leave it alone. If the coracoacromial ligament is frayed or abnormal, we release it and perform an anterior acromioplasty. ALWAYS check an axillary image for an os acromiale before releasing the coracoacromial ligament, because this may lead to instability of the os.

  • AC joint resection/revision if symptomatic.

Radiographic Anomalies

Surgical Anatomy

  • Pertinent neurological anatomy:

    • Axillary nerve: 5 cm from the lateral edge of the acromion

    • Musculocutaneous nerve: 5 cm distal from the tip of the coracoid

    • Suprascapular nerve: 2 cm medial to the superior glenoid

  • Know the innervation of the rotator cuff muscles and deltoid

  • Know the anatomy of the rotator cuff footprint ( Figs. 33.14–33.16 )

    FIG. 33.14, (A) Lateral view of intact myotendinous units with intervals marked prior to dissection. (B) Model showing footprints of the supraspinatus (green) and infraspinatus (red). The subscapularis footprint (blue) is anterior to the biceps groove.

    FIG. 33.15, (A) Anterior view of the subscapularis on a cadaver before the footprint was dissected. (B) Footprint of the subscapularis (blue) on the model. 7

    FIG. 33.16, (A) Posterior view of a cadaver showing infraspinatus and teres minor. (B) Dissected interval between infraspinatus and teres minor. (C) Model showing footprints of infraspinatus (red) and teres minor (black) , as well as supraspinatus (green).

Surgical Indications

  • Symptomatic recurrent rotator cuff tear that has failed conservative management

  • Other causes of symptoms that have failed conservative management or that were not addressed at the time of the index procedure (i.e., AC joint degenerative joint disease, biceps symptoms, and so forth)

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here