Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Primary tumors may spread to the spine in 20% to 40% of cancer patients, and approximately 20% of these patients will be symptomatic from their tumors. Their symptomatology may be related to compression of the spinal cord, leading to pain and weakness, mechanical back pain from spinal instability, or a combination of these two. The presence of mechanical back pain should prompt consideration for stabilization of the spine, as this pain may be partially or completely resolved if instability is the true etiology of their pain. There is ample evidence to suggest that surgical decompression plus radiation is the management of choice for patients with spinal metastatic disease and epidural compression. However, there is no clear consensus as to when patients undergoing surgery will require stabilization. These decisions were typically made according to factors such as patient symptoms, patient health and life expectancy, and tumor histology, but there was a lack of evidence-based guidelines for determination of spinal stability. The Spinal Instability in Neoplastic disease Score (SINS) is a tool to guide clinicians who are evaluating patients with spinal metastatic disease to help determine the need for surgical stabilization ( Table 48.1 ). There are six components to this scoring system, including location, presence of mechanical pain, spinal alignment, whether the tumor is lytic or blastic, amount of vertebral body collapse, and tumor involvement of posterior elements. A score is given according to each component, and the cumulative score determines whether the patient will require stabilization. In this chapter, we present a patient with metastatic disease for which this score may be applied.
Chief complaint: neck pain and radiculopathy
History of present illness: This is a 65-year-old female with a history of breast cancer status post chemoradiation on remission. She presents with several months of back pain. Over the past few days, she reports worsening pain, balance dysfunction, leg weakness, and numbness. She underwent imaging and there was concern for cord compression ( Figs. 48.1–48.2 ).
Medications: melatonin, metoprolol
Allergies: iodinated contrast
Past medical history: breast cancer, hypertension
Family history: noncontributory
Social history: nonsmoker
Physical examination: awake, alert, and oriented x 3; cranial nerves CNII–XII intact; bilateral deltoids/triceps/biceps/interossei 5/5; iliopsoas 4/5; knee flexion/knee extension/dorsi, and plantar flexion 5/5
Reflexes: 3+ in bilateral biceps/triceps/brachioradialis with positive Hoffman; 3+ in bilateral patella/ankle; positive clonus and Babinski; sensation intact to light touch
Laboratories: basic metabolic panel, heme-8, coagulation all within normal limits
|
|
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Preoperative | ||||
Additional tests requested |
|
|
|
|
Surgical approach selected |
|
|
If prognosis is reasonable (> several months), C6-T6 posterior instrumented fusion with T2-4 laminectomy, possible T2-3 corpectomies with T1-4 interbody fusion | |
Goal of surgery | Decompress the spinal cord, stabilize spine | Relieve neck pain, improve quality of life | Decompress the spinal cord, correction of kyphosis, stabilize the spine | Decompress the spinal cord, stabilize the spine |
Perioperative | ||||
Positioning | Prone with pins | Prone with pins | Stage 1: supineStage 2: prone on Jackson table, no pins | Prone with pins |
Surgical equipment |
|
|
|
|
Medications | Steroids, maintain MAP | None | Steroids, MAP >85 | MAP >80 |
Anatomical considerations | Vertebral bone anatomy | Vertebral arteries, aorta |
|
Spinal cord, T2-3 nerve roots, pleura |
Complications feared with approach chosen | Blood loss, spinal compression, spinal instability | Major vessel injury, spinal cord and/or nerve root injury | Major vessel injury, spinal cord injury, injury to artery of Adamkiewicz | Neurological deficit |
Intraoperative | ||||
Anesthesia | General | General | General | General |
Exposure | C4-T6 | C7-T7 |
|
C6-T6 |
Levels decompressed |
|
T2-4 |
|
T2-4 |
Levels fused |
|
C6-T7 |
|
C6-T6 |
Surgical narrative |
|
Preflip IOM, position prone with pin, keep neutral position, midline incision, subperiosteal dissection exposing from C7 to T7, place C7 pedicle pilot holes with surgical navigation as well as T1/T4-6 pedicles, T2-3 laminectomy, place C7/T1/T4-5 pedicle screws, confirm placement with x-rays, place cobalt chromium alloy rods, layered closure |
|
Positioned prone with Mayfield pins, neutral anatomical alignment, fluoroscopy to localize level, midline incision, subperiosteal dissection, instrumentation with lateral mass screws at C6, pedicle screws at C7/T1/T4-T6, T2-4 en bloc laminectomy with high-speed drill, removal of ligamentum flavum, wide bony removal at T2-3 similar to costotransversectomy, bilateral T2-3 nerve roots are identified and ligated, T2-3 corpectomies with osteotome and curettage working lateral to the spinal cord, tissue sent to pathology, size corpectomy defect, insertion of appropriate sized interbody device filled with allograft, O-arm spin to confirm accuracy of instrumentation, rods contoured appropriated and placed in screw heads, set screws placed and final tightened after fluoroscopy, remained bone between C6 and T6 decorticated and allograft is laid, wound closed in layers with drain |
Complication avoidance | Preflip IOM, possible surgical navigation, two-staged approach, cardiothoracic for anterior exposure | Preflip IOM, surgical navigation for pedicle screws | Two-staged approach, cardiothoracic for anterior exposure, use discectomies to evaluate depth, preflip IOM prior to starting second stage, early placement of rods to prevent spinal translation and dislodgement of cage | En bloc laminectomy, work lateral to spinal cord for corpectomy |
Postoperative | ||||
Admission | ICU | ICU | ICU | ICU |
Postoperative complications feared | Blood loss, spinal compression, spinal instability | Infection, instrument failure, aortic injury | Major vessel injury, spinal cord injury, injury to artery of Adamkiewicz | Neurological deficit |
Anticipated length of stay | 4–6 days | 10 days | 5–7 days | 5 days |
Follow-up testing |
|
Radiation oncology evaluation |
|
|
Bracing | None | Soft collar for 3 months | TLSO for 6 weeks | CTO for 6 weeks |
Follow-up visits | 2 weeks, monthly after surgery | 1 week, every 1–2 months after surgery | 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year after surgery | 3 weeks after surgery |
Location | Junctional (occiput-C2, C7-T2, T11-L1, L5-S1) | 3 |
Mobile spine (C3-C6, L2-L4) | 2 | |
Semirigid (T3-T10) | 1 | |
Rigid (S2-S5) | 0 | |
Mechanical Pain | Yes | 3 |
Pain present but not mechanical | 1 | |
No pain | 0 | |
Type Of Bone Lesion | Lytic | 2 |
Mixed | 1 | |
Blastic | 0 | |
Spinal Alignment | Subluxation/translation | 4 |
Kyphosis/scoliosis | 2 | |
Normal alignment | 0 | |
Vertebral Body | >50% collapse | 3 |
Colapse | <50% collapse | 2 |
No collapse with >50% body involved | 1 | |
None of the above | 0 | |
Involvement Of | Bilateral | 3 |
Posterolateral | Unilateral | 1 |
Elements | None | 0 |
Metastatic disease
Multiple myeloma
Primary bone tumor such as chordoma
Osteomyelitis
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here