Questions

  • 1.

    Match the cases shown in Fig. 23.1, A - D , with the following diagnoses:

    • ____Bronchogenic carcinoma.

    • ____Pneumonia with abscess.

    • ____Bronchopleural fistula with hydropneumothorax.

    • ____Pulmonary gangrene.

    Fig. 23.1

  • 2.

    Which one of the following pulmonary infections is least likely cause of necrotizing pneumonia?

    • a.

      Streptococcus pneumoniae.

    • b.

      Pseudomonas.

    • c.

      Klebsiella.

    • d.

      Staphylococcus aureus.

    • e.

      Mixed gram-negative pneumonia.

  • 3.

    Refer to Fig. 23.2 . Which one of the following diagnoses is least likely?

    • a.

      Bronchogenic carcinoma.

    • b.

      Metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

    • c.

      Chronic anaerobic abscess.

    • d.

      Bronchogenic cyst.

    • e.

      Tuberculous cavity.

    Fig. 23.2

  • 4.

    Which one of the following best explains the radiologic presentation in Fig. 23.3, A-C ?

    • a.

      Metastatic melanoma.

    • b.

      Tuberculosis with bronchogenic spread.

    • c.

      Bronchogenic carcinoma.

    • d.

      Coccidioidomycosis.

    • e.

      Metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

    Fig. 23.3

Discussion

The radiologic presentation of a localized, avascular, lucent lung defect surrounded by a band of opacity might best be described as a hole in the lung, although this is a nonmedical term. Chart 23.1 lists a number of causes for a solitary hole in the lung that differ considerably in their pathogenesis. For this reason, such terms as cavity, cyst, and pneumatocele constitute the differential diagnosis for a hole in the lung. 317 This chapter examines differences in the pathogenesis of these lesions as a basis for understanding the similarities and differences in their radiologic presentations.

Chart 23.1
Solitary Lucent Defect

  • I.

    Cavity

    • A.

      Inflammation

    • B.

      Neoplasms

      • 1.

        Primary lung tumor 587

      • 2.

        Metastases (usually multiple) 118

        • a.

          Squamous cell (e.g., nasopharynx, esophagus, cervix)

        • b.

          Adenocarcinoma (e.g., lung, breast, gastrointestinal tract)

        • c.

          Osteosarcoma (rare)

        • d.

          Melanoma

    • C.

      Vascular (commonly multiple)

      • 1.

        Rheumatoid 146 , 468

      • 2.

        Granulomatosis with polyangiitis 4

      • 3.

        Infarct (thromboemboli or septic emboli)

    • D.

      Environmental

      • 1.

        Silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (most commonly owing to complicating tuberculosis)

  • II.

    Pneumatocele

  • III.

    Congenital cyst 463 , 464

    • A.

      Bronchogenic cyst

    • B.

      Intrapulmonary sequestration 149 , 233

  • IV.

    Parasitic cysts (hydatid cyst) 30 , 435

  • V.

    Bronchiectatic cyst 464

  • VI.

    Bullous emphysema 169

Cavity

The radiologic appearance of a pulmonary cavity is the result of necrosis of lung parenchyma with evacuation of the necrotic tissue via the tracheobronchial tree. A communication with the tracheobronchial tree permits air to enter the area of necrosis, with the radiologic result of a lucent defect. The necrosis causes near-complete destruction of the alveolar walls, interlobular septa, and bronchovascular bundles in the area of the cavity, resulting in loss of normal vascular markings throughout the area of lucency. The surrounding normal lung parenchyma reacts to the necrosis by forming a band of inflammation around the necrotic material, with local edema and hemorrhage. When the cavity expands under tension, as frequently happens in patients who are on positive-pressure ventilator therapy, there may even be compression of normal surrounding lung. The surrounding inflammatory cellular infiltrate, edema, hemorrhage, and compressed normal lung all contribute to the cavity wall. Central necrosis of a preexisting nodule or mass with drainage of its liquefied contents is a second mechanism for the development of a cavity. Central necrosis with liquefaction of a pulmonary lesion cannot be detected on a chest radiograph prior to drainage of a portion of the liquid. However, computed tomography (CT) is sensitive to the difference in opacity caused by liquefaction and may be useful for detecting early necrosis of a pulmonary infection or neoplasm ( Fig. 23.4, A and B ).

Fig. 23.4, A, Posteroanterior chest radiograph demonstrates diffuse opacification of the right lung but no evidence of cavitation. B, Computed tomography (CT) scan reveals a well-localized area of liquefaction of tissue, with an air-fluid level. CT is more sensitive for the detection of early cavitation of pneumonias and often permits the early diagnosis of necrotizing pneumonias.

The radiologic characteristics of the wall of a cavity are determined by the reaction of the lung parenchyma to the pathologic process. A surrounding air space consolidation indicates acute edema, hemorrhage, or exudate, whereas irregular reticular strands are suggestive of chronic fibrotic scars. Therefore, wall characteristics may be helpful in establishing the age of the cavity. In addition, necrosis of an inflammatory or neoplastic mass may leave thick nodular walls ( Fig. 23.5, A and B ; see Fig. 23.1, A ).

Fig. 23.5, Tuberculous cavities are most typically in the apical segments of the upper lobes, but cavities in other locations are not rare. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was cultured from this cavity in the left lower lobe.

Pyogenic Infection

The term abscess is usually reserved for cavities that are caused by pyogenic infections. This complication indicates a virulent process that results in vasculitis with thrombosis of small vessels, which leads to necrosis of lung tissue. The abscess, which is made up of necrotic material, will appear to be of tissue opacity until communications with airways are established. These communications permit drainage of the necrotic debris. This liquefied necrotic material is coughed up, with the radiologic result of a lucent defect or cavity. The presence of cavitation in the acute phase of a pulmonary infection is a significant radiologic finding that narrows the differential considerations; viral and mycoplasma pneumonia are virtually eliminated, and pneumococcal pneumonia (infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae ) would be a rarity. The organisms most likely to lead to cavitation are Staphylococcus , beta-hemolytic streptococci, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, Escherichia coli, mixed gram-negative organisms, and anaerobes. (Answer to question 2 is a .)

Aspiration is frequently the source of the mixed gram-negative and anaerobic infections. This may be the result of subclinical aspiration and has been described as gravitational pneumonia. Aspiration pneumonia should be particularly suspected when the cavity occurs in a dependent portion of the lung. The clinical setting of a condition such as poor oral hygiene, alcoholism, or a tumor in the nasopharynx, larynx, or mouth supports the diagnosis. The patient typically experiences a febrile response with productive cough, similar to that of other patients with necrotizing pneumonia.

On occasion, the cavities resulting from a necrotizing pneumonia rupture into the pleura, forming a bronchopleural fistula. This leads to the radiologic appearance of a hydropneumothorax, which is usually recognized by an air-fluid level in the pleural space. Pleural air-fluid collections are often elliptic, may lack an identifiable wall, and have air-fluid levels that differ in length depending on the radiographic projection. Abscesses tend to have spherical thick walls and air-fluid levels that are equal in length, regardless of the radiographic projection 458, 519, 557 ( Fig. 23.6, A and B ; see Fig. 23.1, C and D ). CT may be required to distinguish an abscess from a loculated hydropneumothorax secondary to bronchopleural fistula. 318, 625 The clinical presentation of pyogenic pneumonia is usually dramatic with the patient being profoundly ill, running a toxic febrile course, and having an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count. Because of the necrosis of lung tissue, hemoptysis is not a rare complication of these more virulent infections. Culture of the organism is required for definitive diagnosis.

Fig. 23.6, A, Lateral view of the patient shown in Fig. 23.1 , C, demonstrates a spherical cavity with an air-fluid level in the lingular segment of the left upper lobe. This confirms the diagnosis of pneumonia with lung abscess. B, Lateral view of the patient seen in Fig. 23.1 , D, demonstrates a posterior, vertically oriented, elliptic structure with an air-fluid level. This confirms a pleural air-fluid collection consistent with hydropneumothorax. This resulted from pneumonia with a bronchopleural fistula.

Pulmonary gangrene 662 results from the very acute ischemic necrosis of lung tissue. It differs from lung abscess in that a region of lung undergoes necrosis, detaches from viable lung, and forms a mass of devitalized tissue lying within a cavity. Organisms to be considered when gangrene is identified include Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mucor fungi, and Aspergillus. The characteristic radiographic appearance is that of a mass surrounded by eccentric lucency (see Fig. 23.1, B ). Radiographically, pulmonary gangrene may resemble a fungus ball in a cavity, but the latter is due to a solid mass of fungus that has colonized a preexisting cavity or cystic space. CT may be helpful in demonstrating that the intracavitary mass consists of lung. Early diagnosis of gangrene is important because it may require surgical resection.

Granulomatous Disease

Tuberculosis is the prototypical cause of an infectious pulmonary cavity. The cavitary phase of tuberculosis rarely occurs at the time of the initial infection but is a secondary phenomenon resulting from a hyperimmune response. 82, 641 The necrosis of lung tissue liberates organisms previously isolated by a surrounding fibrotic reaction. The cavities of tuberculosis are usually quite distinctive because of their proclivity to the apical or the posterior segments of the upper lobes. Approximately 10% of tuberculous cavities are found in atypical locations. A cavity in an anterior segment of an upper lobe as the sole manifestation of pulmonary tuberculosis is very rare. Isolated lower lobe cavities are rarely caused by tuberculosis, but lower lobe tuberculosis in association with upper lobe disease is not rare. Although these latter locations should be considered more suggestive of some of the other causes of cavitary disease, such as acute necrotizing pneumonias or fungal infections, an unusual location should not be cause for rejecting the diagnosis of tuberculosis (see Fig. 23.5 ). 54, 82, 215, 388, 641

Other radiologic features that aid in the identification of a tuberculous cavity include the following: (1) associated reticular pulmonary scars; (2) volume loss in the involved lobe; (3) pleural thickening; (4) pleural calcification; and (5) calcified hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes. These are all the result of a long-standing inflammatory response. The reticular or linear scars cause a very irregular margin of the outer wall of the cavity. These linear opacities are the result of granulomas and fibrotic scarring. The fibrotic scars are also the cause of the volume loss, which is radiologically detected by noting an elevation of the hilum and shift of the mediastinum (see discussion of cicatrizing atelectasis in Chapter 13 ). Calcified nodular opacities in the area of the cavity indicate a previous granulomatous infection. Associated homogeneous nodules are less diagnostic but may occur in clusters and indicate transbronchial spread of infection.

Reactivation of tuberculosis indicates a failure in host defenses. Older patients and those with chronic illnesses, including acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and a variety of neoplasms 342 —in particular, lung cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma—are at increased risk for developing active tuberculosis. The failure of an immune response results in liberation of organisms that may have been isolated for years. Exposure to a person with cavitary tuberculosis accounts for most new cases of tuberculosis. In addition to the possibility of spreading the infection to others, patients in this phase of tuberculosis are at considerable risk of developing disseminated infection, which may be bronchogenic or hematogenous.

The distinction of hematogenous and bronchogenic spread is greatly assisted by assessment of the clinical course. Involvement of multiple organs indicates hematogenous or miliary infection. As described in Chapter 17 , the radiologic presentation of miliary tuberculosis is that of a diffuse fine nodular pattern, with the nodules being sharply defined. The association of cavitary tuberculosis with disseminated larger opacities in the range of 2 to 5 mm and that have ill-defined borders is more suggestive of bronchogenic spread, with the opacities representing peribronchial inflammatory infiltrates and exudation into the terminal air spaces. The latter has been termed acinar tuberculosis. 175 The combination of a large, irregular, upper lobe cavity and ill-defined opacities in the lower lobe strongly suggests the diagnosis. A primary or secondary tumor is unlikely to produce such a pattern; the irregular nodules with ill-defined borders are certainly not typical metastatic nodules. Bronchogenic carcinoma might produce a similar cavity but is an unlikely cause for the disseminated opacities. Coccidioidomycosis is a granulomatous infection that can mimic tuberculosis and cannot be entirely eliminated by radiologic criteria alone, but the case shown in Fig. 23.3, A-C , would not represent a classic appearance for cavitary coccidioidomycosis and is a case of cavitary tuberculosis with transbronchial spread of the infection. (Answer to question 4 is b. )

Atypical mycobacterial infections ( Fig. 23.7, A and B ) produce a variety of patterns including cavities that are indistinguishable from tuberculosis, nodules, masses, and bronchiectasis, as well as the small diffuse nodules of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is the most common of the nontuberculous mycobacteria. When conventional laboratory examinations fail to isolate the cause of an apical cavity, atypical mycobacteria must be considered. Although the radiologic features of the cavity are often identical to those in typical tuberculosis, some differences in the radiologic presentation of the two infections have been described. The atypical organisms are more likely to produce multiple, thin-walled, apical cavities with only minimal surrounding parenchymal disease and with minimal or no pleural reaction. Nodules surrounding a cavity are uncommon. Nodules or masses without a cavity may mimic the appearance of lung cancer or metastases. Patients with chronic lung diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, cystic fibrosis, and bronchiectasis, are at increased risk for atypical mycobacterial infection. MAC is also a common cause of opportunistic infection, especially in patients with AIDS. It occurs in the setting of a CD4 count of less than 100 cells/mm 3 and causes cavities, nodules, endobronchial nodules, pericardial effusion, and extensive hilar or mediastinal adenopathy. 366

Fig. 23.7, A, This right apical opacity has a lucency suggesting an apical cavity. Cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis were negative . B, Computed tomography scan confirms a peripheral opacity with a small lucent center, but the lucency seen on the chest radiograph is probably accounted for by the associated bullae. This patient also has linear scarring of the right upper lobe. Chronic lung disease is a risk factor for atypical mycobacterial infection, and cultures confirmed Mycobacterium avium complex.

Histoplasmosis 97, 110, 371 is another consideration in the differential diagnosis of an apical cavity that may completely mimic the appearance of tuberculosis. In fact, histoplasmosis was originally discovered because of its similarities to tuberculosis. 108 There may even be extensive, associated parenchymal scarring, volume loss, and calcifications involving the lung parenchyma and hilar lymph nodes. This diagnosis should be considered most likely in patients who have negative reactions to skin or serologic tests for tuberculosis and who have positive reactions to skin or serologic tests for histoplasmosis.

Cavitary coccidioidomycosis 373 is much more variable in terms of location of the cavities than is tuberculosis or histoplasmosis. In contrast to tuberculosis, coccidioidomycotic cavities may occur in the anterior segment of the upper lobes as well as in the lower lobes, but these cavities, like those of tuberculosis, are more common in the upper lobes. The cavities of coccidioidomycosis frequently form in areas of a preexisting nodule. The classic evolution of a coccidioidomycotic cavity begins with a parenchymal infiltrate that organizes into a nodule. The nodule undergoes necrosis, leading to the formation of a cavity when communications with small airways are established to permit drainage of the necrotic material. A very thin-walled cavity is considered classic for coccidioidomycosis, but this is a relatively late stage of cavitary coccidioidomycosis. The thick-walled cavity is at least as common as the classic so-called “grape skin,” or thin-walled, cavity ( Fig. 23.8, A and B ).

Fig. 23.8, A, Atypical appearance of coccidioidomycosis. A small cavity occurred in a large focal opacity with ill-defined borders. It was not a thin-walled cavity, but this is probably more common than sometimes suggested. The patient had never been in the southwestern United States. The organism was brought to the patient, who worked with cotton and wool from the Southwest. B, The cavity did not completely resolve but left a nodular residual, which is a well-known result of any granulomatous infection.

Clinical correlation is helpful in evaluating patients with cavities. As expected, hemoptysis is a nonspecific finding and is consistent with any cavitary process. A history of having been in an area where coccidioidomycosis is endemic supports the diagnosis. Patients who have not been in an endemic area are usually not suspected of having this infection, but on occasion the organism can be transported to the patient. This has been documented in patients working with cotton, wool, and other farm products from the desert Southwest. The results of skin and serologic tests add valuable data to the diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis.

Other fungal agents, including Blastomyces dermatitidis (North American blastomycosis), Cryptococcus neoformans (cryptococcosis), and actinomycosis, are less common causes of pulmonary cavities that produce patterns similar to those of tuberculosis and histoplasmosis. These diagnoses require laboratory confirmation.

Nocardia spp. are gram-positive organisms that were previously classified as fungi. Nocardiosis frequently results in consolidation or in pulmonary nodules, which may cavitate. It is rarely encountered in normal patients but is not rare in patients who are immunologically suppressed. Nocardiosis is a well-known cause of pulmonary infection in renal transplant patients and in patients with alveolar proteinosis. It should not lead to chronic cavities with the surrounding scars typical of tuberculosis and histoplasmosis.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here