Regional anaesthetic techniques


Regional anaesthetic techniques are used for both operative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia. They are becoming more popular as a result of advances in drugs and equipment and improved techniques of anatomical localisation, particularly ultrasonic location. In addition, there is a greater appreciation of the need to improve postoperative pain control using techniques that not only reduce pain but also have the ability to abolish it and potentially improve outcome. This chapter outlines the basic principles of patient management in regional anaesthesia and the methods used in the performance of a variety of common neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks. Regional anaesthetic techniques for obstetrics, ophthalmological and dental surgery, and airway instrumentation and tracheal intubation are described in other chapters.

Features of regional anaesthesia

Regional anaesthesia may be used alone or in combination with sedation or general anaesthesia, depending on individual circumstances. Neuraxial regional anaesthetic procedures include spinal, epidural or combined spinal-epidural techniques. Peripheral nerve blockade refers to any technique using local anaesthetic drugs to prevent transmission of nerve impulses along the course of one or more peripheral nerves.

Advantages of regional techniques include the following:

  • 1.

    Avoidance of the adverse effects of general anaesthesia. These may range from relatively minor complaints such as postoperative nausea and vomiting or sore throat to major issues such as airway complications, aspiration pneumonitis, postoperative respiratory impairment, myocardial infarction or accidental awareness. In addition, the management of many patients with significant medical comorbidity, such as diabetes, obesity or pulmonary disease, can be improved or simplified by the use of regional anaesthesia. In older patients, postoperative cognitive dysfunction may be limited by reducing or avoiding psychoactive drugs associated with general anaesthesia and maintaining contact with their surroundings.

  • 2.

    Postoperative analgesia . Regional anaesthetic techniques can be used to provide effective, prolonged postoperative analgesia whilst avoiding the systemic effects of other analgesic drugs, especially opioids. Analgesia can be provided using: long-acting local anaesthetics; continuous catheter techniques, either neuraxial or peripheral; or pharmacological adjuncts, either systemic or perineural. A common adjunct is dexamethasone, which usefully prolongs the analgesic duration of peripheral nerve blockade when given i.v. or when added to local anaesthetic and delivered perineurally as part of the peripheral nerve block itself ( ). If a long-acting local anaesthetic is used to provide prolonged postoperative analgesia, it is important that the nursing staff and the patient are aware of the risk of tissue damage to any blocked area, whether from direct trauma or indirect pressure from poor positioning or prolonged immobility. Simple techniques such as supporting the arm in a sling after brachial plexus block may help prevent injury and encourage earlier mobilisation.

  • 3.

    Preservation of consciousness during surgery. The ability to assess neurological status continuously may be an advantage in patients with a head injury or diabetes or those undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Patient positioning may be safer and more comfortable and damage to pressure areas or joints avoided if the patient is awake. Airway and neck manipulation can be avoided; this may be especially important in a patient with severe rheumatoid arthritis or an unstable cervical spine.

  • 4.

    Sympathetic blockade and attenuation of the stress response to surgery.

  • 5.

    Improved gastrointestinal motility and reduced nausea and vomiting. This can allow earlier feeding and more rapid mobilisation and discharge.

There are now several studies suggesting that the net effect of these features may lead to a reduction in the incidence of major postoperative pulmonary complications, though claims of other pathophysiological benefits remain unproven. Some patients may be unhappy at the prospect of being awake during surgery. In this situation, the combination of a regional anaesthetic technique with target-controlled i.v. sedation or general anaesthesia may be valuable. Similarly, this combination works well for prolonged surgery, where patient positioning may be compromised by generalised discomfort or where surgery at several sites is necessary.

Complications of regional anaesthetic techniques

The incidence of complications may be minimised by ensuring adequate supervision and training in regional anaesthetic techniques and by exercising care in the performance of all blocks. Many anaesthetists recommend performing blocks in the awake (or lightly sedated) patient. This offers several advantages:

  • it encourages careful, meticulous practice;

  • it provides the anaesthetist with information on block onset and efficacy; and

  • it alerts the anaesthetist to early complications such as inadvertent i.v. injection, signifying possible local anaesthetic toxicity, or intraneural injection, signifying possible nerve damage.

Sufficient expertise and equipment must always be available to deal with potential complications. Regional anaesthesia carries a small risk of injury to either the central or peripheral nervous systems (see Chapter 26 ). Anaesthetists should be familiar with the emergency management of total spinal anaesthesia, local anaesthetic toxicity and anaphylaxis because these are recognised complications of regional anaesthesia (see Chapter 27 ).

Patient assessment and selection

Careful preoperative evaluation is as important before a regional anaesthetic as it is before general anaesthesia and the same principles apply (see Chapter 19 ). It is inappropriate to proceed with surgery under local or regional anaesthesia for the sake of convenience in the poorly prepared patient.

  • Consent. The preoperative visit should be used to establish rapport with the patient. A clear description of the proposed anaesthetic technique should be given in simple terms. Patients require an explanation of the reasons for selecting a particular regional technique, its advantages, material risks and alternatives. Consent should be an individualised process, considering the particular circumstances of the specific patient in question (see Chapter 21 ). There should be no attempt at coercion to accept a particular technique. An explanation that nerve blockade by local anaesthetic abolishes pain sensation but may preserve some sensation of touch, pressure and proprioception is often helpful.

  • Practical considerations and absolute contraindications. Potential problems related to the intended block should be anticipated. Anatomical deformities or pain affecting patient positioning may render some blocks impractical. Contraindications to regional anaesthesia are discussed later.

  • Abnormalities of coagulation. Anticoagulant therapy and bleeding diatheses are not automatic contraindications to the use of regional anaesthesia. The decision to perform neuraxial anaesthesia and the timing of catheter removal in a patient receiving antithrombotic therapy should be made on an individual basis, weighing the small but definite risk of vertebral canal or perineural haematoma against the benefits of regional blockade for a specific patient. The patient's coagulation status should be optimised at the time of needle or catheter placement and indwelling catheters should not be removed in the presence of therapeutic anticoagulation because this seems to increase the risk of haematoma significantly. Importantly, neuraxial techniques and peripheral nerve blocks at sites which are not externally compressible (e.g. the lumbar plexus) carry a higher risk of uncontrolled haemorrhage than those at easily compressible sites (e.g. the axilla). Close monitoring is vital to allow early evaluation of neurological dysfunction and allow prompt intervention where necessary.

  • Anaesthetists must be familiar with all new classes of novel anticoagulant drugs because these are increasingly used. Tests of coagulation, including platelet count and function, prothrombin time and activated partial prothrombin time, are a useful adjunct to the decision-making process; however, the concept that particular test results alone can be applied to categorise a block as ‘safe’ or ‘unsafe’ is misleading and unhelpful. Guidelines for the use of neuraxial blockade in the presence of anticoagulants are shown in Table 25.1 .

    Table 25.1
    Association of Anaesthetists recommendations for the performance of neuraxial procedures (spinal anaesthesia, epidural catheter insertion or removal, combined spinal-epidural techniques) in patients with normal renal function in association with drugs used to modify coagulation ( )
    Drug Acceptable time after drug dose for neuraxial block performance Administration of drug while neuraxial catheter in situ Acceptable time after neuraxial block performance or catheter removal for next drug dose
    NSAIDs No additional precautions No additional precautions No additional precautions
    Aspirin No additional precautions No additional precautions No additional precautions
    Clopidogrel or prasugrel 7 days Not recommended 6 h
    Dipyridamole No additional precautions No additional precautions 6 h
    Unfractionated heparin (i.v. treatment) 4 h or normal APTTr Caution 4 h
    LMWH (s.c. prophylactic dose) 12 h Caution 4 h
    LMWH (s.c. treatment dose) 24 h Not recommended 4–24 h
    Fondaparinux (prophylactic dose) 36–42 h (consider anti-Xa levels) Not recommended 6–12 h
    Fondaparinux (treatment dose) Avoid (consider anti-Xa levels) Not recommended 12 h
    Warfarin INR ≤ 1.4 Not recommended After catheter removal
    Rivaroxaban (prophylactic dose) 18 h Not recommended 6 h
    Rivaroxaban (treatment dose) 48 h Not recommended 6 h
    Dabigatran (prophylactic or treatment dose) 48 h (provided CrCl > 80 ml min –1 ) Not recommended 6 h
    Apixaban (prophylactic dose) 24–48 h Not recommended 6 h
    Thrombolytics (alteplase, reteplase, streptokinase) 10 days Not recommended 10 days
    APTTr, Activated partial thromboplastin time ratio; CrCl, creatinine clearance; INR, international normalised ratio; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin.

  • Pharmacological therapy. The use of NSAIDs is not a contraindication to neuraxial or peripheral nerve block unless combined with other anticoagulant agents.

  • Cardiovascular comorbidity. Sympathetic blockade with consequent vasodilatation may lead to profound hypotension, and this can be particularly dangerous in patients with significant aortic or mitral stenosis. Careful consideration of the best way to maintain systemic vascular resistance during anaesthesia should be taken in such patients. Significant hypovolaemia must be corrected before contemplating spinal or epidural anaesthesia.

  • Neurological comorbidity. There is no evidence that neuromuscular disorders or multiple sclerosis are adversely affected by regional anaesthetic techniques, but most anaesthetists use regional anaesthesia in such patients only if there are obvious benefits to be gained; any perioperative deterioration in the neurological condition may be associated by the patient with the regional anaesthetic procedure. Raised intracranial pressure is a contraindication to central neuraxial blockade, but peripheral techniques may be considered.

Selection of technique

Local anaesthetic drugs may be administered by:

  • 1.

    single dose; and/or

  • 2.

    continuous infusion or repeated intermittent bolus administration via an indwelling catheter.

It is essential that the technique selected is tailored to, and sufficient for, the planned surgery. The anaesthetist's primary objective is to ensure adequate intraoperative anaesthesia and/or postoperative analgesia. The duration of surgery, its site (which may be multiple, e.g. the need to obtain bone graft from the iliac crest) and the likelihood of a change of procedure in mid-operation should all be considered. The problem of multiple sites of surgery can be met using one block that covers both sites or by more than one regional anaesthetic procedure where indicated. The duration of anaesthesia may be tailored to the anticipated duration of surgery by selection of an appropriate local anaesthetic agent or may require the use of a technique that allows further administration of drug through an indwelling catheter. If regional anaesthesia has been selected primarily to provide analgesia during and after surgery under general anaesthesia, a more peripheral technique that provides more selective sensory blockade with less motor impairment may be more appropriate.

Premedication

Premedication before performance of regional anaesthesia is very rarely required. Patient anxiety regarding being awake for block performance or surgery itself, is often very amenable to simple explanation and reassurance. It is helpful to enquire about specific patient concerns, such as being able to see or hear the procedure, because these are often easily addressed. A small dose of i.v. benzodiazepine is useful in some patients to achieve anxiolysis when performing a block. Nerve blocks can themselves sometimes be considered a form a premedication, such as a femoral nerve block performed to alleviate the pain of proximal femoral fracture before definitive surgical fixation. Patients undergoing regional anaesthesia should be fasted preoperatively in the same manner as if they were undergoing general anaesthesia.

Timing

A well-organised operating list will not be delayed by delivery of regional anaesthesia, which when conducted appropriately can improve theatre suite efficiency. It is essential that sufficient time is allowed to perform the block without undue haste on the part of the anaesthetic team. The risk of inadvertent wrong-sided nerve block is increased if time pressure and other distractions are allowed to impinge, even subconsciously, on the concentration of the anaesthetic team.

Regional block equipment

Needles

The use of very fine spinal needles (25–27G) reduces the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH), as does the use of pencil-point Whitacre and Sprotte needles ( Fig. 25.1 ). The 27G Whitacre needles appear to be associated with the lowest incidence of PDPH, but confident and successful use of these needles requires greater expertise than is needed for the use of larger needles.

Fig. 25.1, Left to right: Quincke, Whitacre, Sprotte and Spinocath spinal needles.

For peripheral blocks, short-bevelled needles allow greater tactile appreciation of fascial planes and may reduce the likelihood of nerve damage because they displace nerves rather than penetrate them. A variety of insulated needles are available for plexus and peripheral nerve blockade using a nerve stimulator. Needle visibility during ultrasound guidance may be improved by using echogenic needles that have ‘corner stone’ reflectors positioned at the distal end of the cannula shaft. For peripheral nerve blocks, syringes are usually connected to the block needle via flexible tubing. This allows the anaesthetist to hold the needle steady while aspiration tests are performed and syringes are changed, as required. The system must be primed to prevent air embolism and to avoid ultrasound image artefacts.

Catheters

Continuous administration of local anaesthetic drugs has been made possible by the development of high-quality perineural catheters, which may be left in position for several days. Careful fixation is essential to maintain the position of the catheter in the postoperative period. Skin adhesive glues are useful in this regard because they provide excellent fixation and minimise leakage of local anaesthetic from the catheter puncture site. Catheters should be labelled clearly to prevent inadvertent injection of i.v. medication.

Non-Luer connection systems for regional anaesthesia

The accidental connection of an intravenous infusion line or syringe to an epidural, intrathecal or perineural needle or catheter (or vice versa) can result in fatal harm. The Luer connector has been in use for more than 100 years and has become the most common small-bore medical connection system. The ubiquity of the Luer system poses an intrinsic risk of inadvertent wrong-route administration of medication. International standard ISO 80369 applies a dedicated non-Luer connector (neuraxial connectors or NRFit) for epidural, intrathecal and perineural devices that cannot connect to intravenous Luer connectors, with the aim of reducing the risk of wrong-route drug administration. This represents a major change to the equipment of hospitals and is expected to take several years to implement fully.

Nerve stimulators

Few anaesthetists continue to use the historical technique of deliberately eliciting paraesthesia to confirm perineural needle tip position when performing a peripheral nerve block. Some anaesthetists use a peripheral nerve stimulator ( Fig. 25.2 ), but an increasing number now use ultrasound guidance to identify needle tip placement. If using peripheral nerve stimulation, it is important to explain to the patient the sensation elicited by electrical stimulation; this usually causes very little discomfort, unless the contracting muscle crosses a fracture site, when duration of stimulation should be kept to the absolute minimum necessary to confirm needle position.

Fig. 25.2, Nerve stimulator and insulated stimulating needle attached to syringe.

Stimulators that deliver a constant current and give a digital display of the current used are readily available. One lead is attached to an electrode on the patient's skin, and the other lead to the needle. After skin puncture, the stimulator is set to a frequency of 1–2 Hz and an initial current of 1–2 mA. Most stimulators have a visual display to confirm a complete circuit when the needle touches the patient. If this fails, connections should be checked or the electrode replaced. Failure to confirm a complete circuit could result in unwanted paraesthesia or nerve injury from repeated needling.

As the nerve is approached, motor nerve fibre stimulation causes muscle contraction in the appropriate distribution. The muscle contraction sought from nerve stimulation is often different from contractions resulting from direct contact of the needle tip with muscle tissue that overlies the target nerve. The current is reduced until visible muscle contraction is still present at a current of (optimally) 0.5 mA; reducing the current still further, the twitch should be seen to disappear when current is very low (e.g. 0.2 mA). A gentle aspiration test is then performed and 1–2 ml local anaesthetic solution slowly injected. Muscle contraction should cease immediately because of nerve displacement. If it does not, and an insulated needle is being used, the tip may have moved beyond the nerve or be placed intravascularly. In this circumstance gentle aspiration should be repeated, the needle withdrawn slightly and the procedure repeated. Severe pain on injection suggests intraneural injection, in which case the needle should be withdrawn and repositioned. When the needle tip has been correctly positioned, the remainder of the anaesthetic solution should be injected slowly with occasional test aspirations.

Ultrasound

A variety of high-quality ultrasound machines are now readily available and these have contributed greatly to advances in regional anaesthetic techniques. All ultrasound machines consist of a display, keyboard or touchscreen menu with transducer controls, computer processing unit and transducer. Many are also equipped with disk storage facilities or printers to allow a record to be made of procedures. The principles of ultrasound are discussed in Chapters 15 and 17 . Production of a clear target image and safe needle guidance requires sound cross-sectional anatomical knowledge along with excellent technical skills.

The most common transducers used for ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia are the linear or curved array probes. Linear high-frequency probes (8–12 MHz) are used to produce superficial images of high resolution, such as would be required for interscalene or axillary brachial plexus block. Curved array low-frequency probes (4–7 MHz) provide improved penetration to visualise deeper structures but with reduced resolution. Using the curved array probe for deeper blocks will provide a broader field of view for appreciation of surrounding anatomical structures and landmarks, such as during performance of a subgluteal sciatic block. The view obtained by a chosen transducer can be optimised by altering the screen depth, the gain (screen brightness) and, on some machines, the adjustable focusing of the beam. Most ultrasound machines allow the operator to select anatomical structures of interest from a preset menu (e.g. ‘nerve’ or ‘vascular’), and this alters these variables automatically to improve image quality. The operator can manipulate the transducer position on the patient by a combination of pressure, alignment, rotation and tilt ( Fig. 25.3 ). The search for an optimal screen image is made easier if each of these movements are applied systematically, rather than changing them concurrently.

Fig. 25.3, PART (Pressure, Alignment, Rotation, Tilt) manipulation of an ultrasound transducer to optimise image quality.

Most nerves exhibit a ‘honeycomb’ appearance on scanning – a combination of nerve fascicles and connective tissue, which varies in appearance depending on the individual nerve, its location and the angle of incidence of the probe. More proximal nerve roots, such as with interscalene imaging, tend to appear hypoechoic or dark as a result of reduced amounts of connective tissue compared with the axilla and peripherally.

There is increasing evidence that ultrasound offers several advantages over traditional landmark or nerve stimulator nerve localisation techniques ( Box 25.1 ).

Box 25.1
Potential advantages of ultrasound-guided nerve blockade

  • Visualisation of target structure

  • Visualisation of surrounding anatomical structures

  • Accuracy of needle placement

  • Visualisation of local anaesthetic spread in real time

  • Compensation for anatomical variation

  • Avoidance of intraneural or i.v. injection

  • Variety of approaches (not landmark dependent)

  • Rapid block onset

  • Reduced local anaesthetic dosage

  • Reduced procedure-related pain

  • Reduced complications

Monitoring

Monitoring equipment should be appropriate to the anaesthetic technique and surgical procedure, with a minimum of three-lead ECG, NIBP and pulse oximetry for all blocks.

Asepsis

As a minimum for all peripheral nerve blocks, operators should wash their hands, wear gloves and draw up and store local anaesthetic syringes in a clean manner. Skin over the scanning and injection site should be prepared with a solution of chlorhexidine 0.5% in alcohol, which should be allowed to dry. Ultrasound probes should be covered with a sterile sheath. Sterile conductivity gel should be used to facilitate ultrasound wave penetration. All major blocks, such as neuraxial blocks or blocks siting a perineural catheter, should be performed under strict aseptic technique with sterile gloves, gown, hat, mask and drapes.

Inadvertent wrong-sided block

Inadvertent wrong-sided peripheral nerve blockade is an avoidable anaesthetic complication. Such events are uncommon but can have serious consequences. These include complications from the unnecessary block such as nerve injury and local anaesthetic toxicity, delayed hospital discharge, patient anxiety and distress and the risk of wrong-sided surgery if the error is not identified promptly ).

A ‘stop before you block’ moment, undertaken as part of every peripheral nerve block, is a strong preventative measure to avert wrong-sided blocks. Many hospitals have adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist, including a ‘sign in’ before anaesthesia is commenced, where the surgical site marking is confirmed against the written consent form. This is not a substitute for a correctly performed ‘stop before you block’ moment, which should occur before every peripheral nerve block immediately before needle insertion and requires the anaesthetist and anaesthetic practitioner to reconfirm:

  • patient identity and consent form;

  • the side of the block; and

  • the surgical site marking.

Circumstances that require particular vigilance include the following:

  • Peripheral nerve blocks performed as a sole procedure rather than in conjunction with a surgical procedure, such as a femoral nerve block the day before the operative management of a proximal femoral fracture. In these circumstances an operative marking may not have been made and a full WHO surgical safety checklist process is recommended, including relevant written procedural consent for the block and block site marking.

  • Moving or turning patients between ‘sign in’ and performance of the nerve block. This can result in the block site ‘moving’ in relation to the anaesthetist and equipment in the room. Certain blocks often necessitate repositioning of patients (e.g. popliteal blocks), and additional care is required to use the ‘stop before you block’ appropriately.

  • Delays and distractions before and during performance of the peripheral nerve block. Certain time-critical and important distractions cannot be avoided by the anaesthetist and anaesthetic assistant, and these will occasionally occur at key moments in the performance of a block. Vigilance is required by the anaesthetist to be aware of these distractors and if any disruption to the usual ‘stop before you block’ procedure occurs, the entire procedure should be discontinued and re-started at a more appropriate time.

  • Covering of preoperative surgical marking with blankets, dressings or drapes.

  • Presence of an ultrasound machine in the anaesthetic room for purposes other than performance of the block (e.g. for venous access). The use of an ultrasound machine in the anaesthetic room for this indication should alert the anaesthetist to the high risk of the wrong-sided block because of the potential unconscious selection of block side based on the presence of an ultrasound machine on one side or other of the patient.

  • Presence of negative external and internal influences on anaesthetist's performance. Time pressure, hunger, thirst, fatigue, background noise and emotional distraction can all increase the risk of wrong-sided block. If these are present and may affect task performance, the anaesthetist should always respond and address these demands before undertaking a peripheral nerve block.

Supplementary techniques

A local anaesthetic may be the only drug administered to the patient, or it may form part of a balanced anaesthetic technique. During surgery, patients may be awake, or sedated by i.v. or inhalational means. Intermittent boluses of midazolam or target-controlled infusions of propofol are commonly used to provide intraoperative sedation. General anaesthesia may be used as a planned part of the procedure. A combination of regional and general anaesthesia may be useful to obtain advantages from both, particularly for prolonged procedures or where positioning is difficult because of trauma or arthritis.

When a surgical tourniquet is used, the chosen block must extend to the tourniquet site unless the procedure is brief. Discomfort from prolonged immobility on a hard table may be relieved by the administration of analgesia during surgery. This type of discomfort is usually not relieved by sedative drugs, which may result in the patient becoming agitated, confused and uncooperative.

Aftercare

At the end of surgery, clear postoperative instructions should be given to both patients and healthcare professionals taking over their care. This may include general advice about analgesia management when a block wears off and care of the insensate limb. It may also include a reiteration of the preoperative advice about block-specific adverse effects, such as Horner's syndrome after interscalene brachial plexus blockade.

Continuous perineural infusion of local anaesthetics

Continuous infusion techniques are suitable for use only by experienced anaesthetists but are increasingly used in both inpatient and ambulatory settings. When used correctly, administration by infusion is safer than repeated large bolus injections of drug, but regular observations are essential and nursing staff must have an adequate level of knowledge to appreciate possible complications. A clear pathway of escalation must exist to allow patients or nursing staff to bring to the attention of an anaesthetist any concerns regarding the continuous infusion.

A variety of needles, catheters, local anaesthetic mixtures and infusion devices are commercially available. Infusions of local anaesthetic can be delivered by fixed-rate infusion alone or in combination with patient-bolus demands. Syringe drivers or elastomeric infusion devices containing low-concentration ropivacaine or levobupivacaine are commonly used to deliver local anaesthetic via perineural catheters.

Block failure

When confronted with the apparent failure of a neuraxial or peripheral nerve block to produce the desired analgesic or anaesthetic effect, the anaesthetist must take a calm, step-wise approach to identify the precise problem and remedy this accordingly. In the circumstances of a block sited preoperatively this is always best done before the patient is prepared and positioned for surgery. Clear communication with the patient regarding sensory expectations is mandatory, and this should have been undertaken as part of the consent process. To determine whether particular myotomes or dermatomes are inadequately anaesthetised, a focused examination of the motor and sensory systems is required ( Fig. 25.4 ). This requires excellent communication between clinician and patient to avoid ambiguity, and a senior anaesthetist may be required at this point. Inadequate sensory blockade in some dermatomes may sometimes be remedied by repeat nerve block, but this should be performed by an experienced practitioner and with the total dose of local anaesthetic in mind. Inadequacy of regional blockade to achieve anaesthesia to the site of surgery should not be managed by increasing doses of sedation, although i.v. analgesics such as fentanyl can be a useful adjunct in awake surgery. Occasionally, conversion to general anaesthesia is required.

Fig. 25.4, Dermatomes and myotomes of abdominal wall (A), upper limb (B) and lower limb (C).

Intravenous regional anaesthesia

Intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) is being used less commonly by anaesthetists, who often prefer to block the brachial plexus, but it is still used by emergency department staff as a simple, safe and effective block for trauma patients. Deaths from IVRA have resulted from incorrect selection of drug and dosage, incorrect technique and the performance of the block by personnel unable to treat systemic local anaesthetic toxicity. Bupivacaine was inappropriately chosen in many of these cases and is now contraindicated for IVRA.

Indications

Intravenous regional anaesthesia is suitable for short procedures when postoperative pain is not marked, such as manipulation of Colles’ fracture or carpal tunnel decompression. Recovery is rapid, and the technique is appropriate for day-case surgery.

Method

Intravenous regional anaesthesia involves isolating an exsanguinated limb from the general circulation by means of an arterial tourniquet and then injecting local anaesthetic solution intravenously. Analgesia and weakness occur rapidly and result predominantly from local anaesthetic action on peripheral nerve endings.

An orthopaedic tourniquet of the correct size is applied over padding on the upper arm. All connections must lock, and the pressure gauge should be calibrated regularly. An i.v. cannula is sited in the contralateral arm in case administration of emergency drugs is required. An i.v. cannula is inserted into a vein of the limb to be anaesthetised. A vein on the dorsum of the hand is preferred because injection into more proximal veins reduces the quality of the block and increases the risk of toxicity. Exsanguination by means of an Esmarch bandage improves the quality of the block and increases the safety of the technique by reducing the venous pressure developed during injection. In patients with a painful lesion (e.g. Colles’ fracture), elevation combined with brachial artery compression is adequate. The tourniquet should be inflated to a pressure 100 mmHg above systolic arterial pressure.

In an adult, 40 ml prilocaine 0.5% is injected over 2 min ensuring that the tourniquet remains inflated. Analgesia should be achieved within 10 min, but it is important to inform the patient that the feeling of touch is often retained. The anaesthetist must be ready to deal with toxicity or tourniquet pain throughout the surgical procedure. The tourniquet should not be released until at least 20 min after injection, even if surgery is completed. This delay allows for diffusion of drug into the tissues so that plasma concentrations do not reach toxic levels after release of the tourniquet. The technique of repeated reinflation and deflation of the cuff during release has little effect on plasma concentrations and is not advised.

Tourniquet pain

Tourniquet pain may be troublesome if the cuff remains inflated for longer than 30–40 min. It is sometimes alleviated by inflating a separate tourniquet below the first on an area already rendered analgesic by the block; the first cuff is then deflated. Failing this, general anaesthesia is preferable to administration of large and often ineffective doses of opioids and sedatives.

Choice of drug

The agent of choice for this procedure is isobaric prilocaine 0.5%. It has an impressive safety record with no major reactions reported after its use, although minor adverse effects such as transient light-headedness after release of the tourniquet are not uncommon. Prilocaine has distinct pharmacokinetic advantages for IVRA and does not cause methaemoglobinaemia in the doses used.

Lower limb

Intravenous regional anaesthesia of the foot may be produced using the same dose of prilocaine and a calf tourniquet positioned carefully at least 10 cm below the tibial tuberosity to avoid compression of the common peroneal nerve on the fibular neck.

Central nerve blocks

Spinal anaesthesia usually refers to intrathecal administration of local anaesthetic and is also known by the term subarachnoid block. The technique of spinal anaesthesia is basically that of lumbar puncture, but knowledge of factors which affect the extent and duration of anaesthesia, and experience in patient management are essential. Epidural block may be performed in the sacral (caudal block), lumbar, thoracic or cervical regions, although lumbar block is used most commonly. Local anaesthetic solution is injected most commonly through a catheter placed in the epidural space but may be injected straight through a needle after the tip position has been confirmed.

Contraindications to central nerve blocks

Most contraindications are relative, but the following are best generally regarded as absolute contraindications to neuraxial blockade:

  • uncorrected abnormality of coagulation;

  • significant hypovolaemia;

  • infection at the injection site;

  • systemic sepsis manifested by pyrexia or rising inflammatory markers despite resuscitation and antibiotic therapy;

  • severe stenotic valvular heart disease (particularly aortic stenosis) or obstructive cardiomyopathy;

  • raised intracranial pressure;

  • patient refusal; and

  • allergy to local anaesthetic medication

Anatomy of the epidural and subarachnoid space

The epidural space is the space between the periosteal lining of the vertebral canal and spinal dura mater. It contains spinal nerve roots, lymphatics, blood vessels and a variable amount of fat ( Figs 25.5 and 25.6 ). Its boundaries are as follows:

  • Superiorly – foramen magnum, where the dural layers fuse with the periosteum of the cranium; hence, local anaesthetic solution placed in the epidural space cannot extend higher than this

  • Inferiorly – sacrococcygeal membrane

  • Anteriorly – posterior longitudinal ligament

  • Posteriorly – ligamentum flavum and vertebral laminae

  • Laterally – pedicles of the vertebrae and intervertebral foramina

Fig. 25.5, The vertebral column. Note that the spinal cord ends at the level of L1 or L2 and that the dural sac extends to the level of the S2 vertebra.

Fig. 25.6, Anatomical relations of the epidural space.

In the normal adult the spinal cord begins at the foramen magnum and ends at the level of L1 or L2 (though it may end lower); here it becomes the cauda equina. The subarachnoid space extends further than the cord, to the level of S2. Below this level, the dura blends with the periosteum of the coccyx. Between the dura and arachnoid is the subdural space, within which the local anaesthetic solution may spread extensively.

The volume of the vertebral canal is finite. An increase in volume of contents of one compartment reduces the compliance of the other compartments and increases the pressures throughout.

Spinal anaesthesia

Indications

Blockade is produced more consistently and with a lower dose of drug by the spinal route than by epidural injection. Duration of analgesia is usually limited to 2–4 h depending on surgical site and may be prolonged by use of intrathecal opioids such as diamorphine, fentanyl or morphine. These drugs carry a minimal risk of serious adverse effects such as respiratory depression, but nausea, pruritus or urinary retention are not uncommon.

Spinal anaesthesia is most suited to surgery below the umbilicus and in this situation the patient may remain awake. Surgery above the umbilicus using spinal block is less appropriate and would usually necessitate addition of a general anaesthetic to abolish the unpleasant sensations from visceral manipulation resulting from afferent impulses transmitted by the vagus nerve.

Types of surgery

  • Urology. Spinal block is commonly employed for urological procedures such as transurethral prostatectomy, but it should be remembered that a block to T10 is required for surgery involving bladder distension. Perineal and penile operations may also be carried out using a low ‘saddle block’, peripheral blockade or caudal anaesthesia.

  • Gynaecology. Minor procedures may be performed reliably with a block to T10. Pelvic floor surgery and vaginal hysterectomy may also be carried out readily with spinal anaesthesia extending to T6, but for procedures requiring laparoscopic assistance, general anaesthesia is necessary.

  • Obstetrics. Spinal anaesthesia is considered the technique of choice for the clear majority of elective caesarean sections and a large proportion of emergency ones. The technique is discussed in detail in Chapter 43 .

  • Orthopaedics. Spinal anaesthesia is suitable for virtually every type of lower limb surgery and these are discussed in more detail in Chapter 36 .

Performance of spinal anaesthesia

Preparation

Full monitoring must be applied and wide-bore i.v. access secured. A full sterile technique must be used (mask, gown, hat, gloves, sterile drapes, antiseptic skin preparation). The skin should be cleaned with 0.5% solution chlorhexidine in alcohol, which should be allowed to evaporate fully (to prevent wicking of the potentially neurotoxic solution into the needle when it touches the skin).

Spinal blockade may be performed with the patient sitting or in the lateral decubitus position ( Table 25.2 , Fig. 25.7 ). If it is anticipated that the procedure may be technically difficult, the midline is usually more discernible with the patient in the sitting position, but the risk of hypotension in the sedated patient or after development of the block may be increased.

Table 25.2
Techniques of spinal anaesthesia
Type of block Upper level of analgesia Position during lumbar puncture Volume of solution
Saddle block S1 Sitting 5 min 1 ml hyperbaric solution
Low thoracic T10–12 Sitting/lateral decubitus 2–3 ml hyperbaric solution
Mid thoracic T4–6 Lateral decubitus/sitting (immediately supine) 3–4 ml hyperbaric solution
Unilateral: A unilateral block, or at least a differential block between limbs, may be achieved by the slow injection of small volumes (1–1.5 ml) of hyperbaric solution in the lateral position. This position then must be maintained for at least 15 min to minimise spread. On return to the supine position there may still be some contralateral spread, and the necessity for smaller volumes and dosage may increase block failure rate.

Fig. 25.7, Spinal curvature. (A) Supine position. (B) Lateral position. (C) Sitting position.

Technique of spinal blockade in the lateral position

For the right-handed anaesthetist, the patient is positioned on the operating table in the left lateral position. The patient's back should lie along the edge of the table. A curled position, with knees drawn to the body and chin on chest, opens the spaces between the lumbar spinous processes. An assistant stands in front of the patient to assist with positioning and to provide reassurance.

Landmark techniques, an example of which is described next, are most commonly used to achieve spinal blockade; however, ultrasound can be used to assist in the placement of spinal (and epidural) needles and is of particular utility in obese patients or those with abnormal vertebral anatomy.

A line (Tuffier's line or the intercristal line) between the iliac crests approximates to the fourth lumbar vertebral body, and spinal injection should be performed at the L3/4 or L4/5 space (see Fig. 25.7 ). All drugs should be drawn into non-Luer connection syringes directly from sterile ampoules using a filter needle to prevent the injection of glass particles into the intrathecal space. A selection of non-Luer connection spinal needles (22–27G) should be available.

The skin and subcutaneous tissues are infiltrated with local anaesthetic using a narrow-gauge needle. Most fine-gauge spinal needles come with a 19G introducer needle to assist in the guidance of the flexible spinal needle to the intrathecal space. This introducer needle, or the spinal needle itself, is inserted in the midline, midway between two spinous processes. In the well-positioned patient, the needle is directed at right angles to the skin, toward the naval. Passage through the interspinous ligament and ligamentum flavum into the spinal canal is appreciated easily with a 22G needle ( Fig. 25.8A ), but these needles are now rarely used because of the high incidence of PDPH. With some practice, these structures can be discerned with a 25G or 27G pencil-point needle, and a click may be felt immediately after the needle tip passes beyond the ligamentum flavum and punctures the arachnoid mater. When the needle tip has breached the ligamentum flavum and epidural space to enter the intrathecal space, the stilette is withdrawn from the needle and the hub observed for CSF flow. A gentle aspiration test can be performed if free flow of CSF is not observed or the needle carefully rotated through 90 degrees.

Fig. 25.8, Midline approach for spinal anaesthesia. (A) Correctly angled. (B) Incorrectly angled.

The most common reasons for difficulty accessing the intrathecal space are incorrect patient positioning, failure to insert the needle in the midline and directing the needle laterally ( Fig. 25.8B ). This last fault is seen most easily from one side and is usually apparent to onlookers but not to the anaesthetist, who looks only along the line of the needle.

When CSF is obtained, the non-Luer connection syringe containing the injectate should be carefully attached to the spinal needle, taking care not to displace the tip. Gentle aspiration, with eddies of CSF seen in the local anaesthetic solution, confirms the needle tip position and the solution is injected slowly (although some have recommended rapid injection to obtain effective blocks using small volumes of injectate). Further aspiration towards the end of injection confirms that the needle tip has remained in the correct place. Needle and introducer are withdrawn together and the patient then repositioned to facilitate the desired spread of the block.

Factors affecting spread

The most important factor which affects the height of block in spinal anaesthesia ( Table 25.3 ) is the baricity of the solution, which may be made hyperbaric (i.e. denser than CSF) by the addition of glucose. The specific gravity of CSF is 1.004. The addition of glucose 5% or 6% to a local anaesthetic produces a solution with specific gravity of 1.024 or greater. A patient who assumes the sitting position for 5 min after injection of 1 ml hyperbaric solution develops a saddle block which affects the sacral roots only. Conversely, a patient placed supine immediately after injection of 2–3 ml develops a block to around T4–8. Slightly larger volumes are advisable to ensure spread above the lumbar curvature (see Fig. 25.7 ), and the spread of local anaesthetic may be encouraged above the lumbar lordosis by raising the patient's knees, flattening the lumbar spine.

Table 25.3
Factors influencing spread of hyperbaric spinal solutions
Factor Effect
Position of patient Sitting position produces perineal block only, provided that small volumes are used.
Spinal curvature With standard volumes (2–3 ml) the block often spreads to T4. With small volumes (1 ml) the block may affect only the perineum even when the patient is placed supine immediately.
Dose of drug Within the range of volumes usually employed increasing the dose of drug increases the duration of anaesthesia rather than the height of the block.
Interspace Minor factor affecting height of block.
Obesity Minor factor affecting height of block. Obese patients tend to develop higher blocks.
Speed of injection Rapid injection makes the height of block more variable.
Barbotage No longer used. Makes the height of block more variable.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here