Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Interventional oncology is a rapidly growing branch of interventional radiology that is a vital part of multidisciplinary oncologic care. In the management of patients with liver tumors, the minimally invasive nature of its procedures allows targeted delivery of oncologic treatments, maximizing their local effects while minimizing the systemic exposure to such treatments. In this chapter we discuss the general concepts of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 and its use for the treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies.
Radiation is known to damage cellular DNA and ultimately lead to cell death. The energetic electrons that damage cellular DNA may arise from either internal radionuclide decay or from interactions in tissue from external photons/protons. The indirect action is caused by the production of hydroxyl radicals (OH − ) when the secondary electron interacts with a water molecule, which is responsible for two thirds of the x-ray damage to DNA. The main mechanisms of cell death include mitotic death, apoptosis, and the bystander effect.
The basic principle of radiation therapy is to maximize radiation absorbed dose within diseased tissue while sparing dose where disease is absent (see Chapter 95 ). Among other considerations, external beam radiation dose plans are ultimately limited by radiation to normal tissue at both entry and exit. A benefit to brachytherapy is its ability to emit energy internally, which enables limiting of the normal tissue absorbed doses. Transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 is a form of brachytherapy and has often also been referred to as selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). In conventional radiotherapy, the probability of tumor response is known to be related to the radiation absorbed dose. SIRT has been for many years primarily a palliative treatment, so careful dosimetric treatment planning was not routinely performed and large uncertainties in absorbed dose calculations have been clinically acceptable. However, the potential of SIRT goes well beyond palliation, as demonstrated by recently published correlations between dosimetry and tumor response and survival. , With recent evidence for tumor and parenchymal dose response thresholds with 90 Y radioembolization, , SIRT has expanded from a whole-liver salvage agent to a precise instrument for definitive, high-dose, conformal radiotherapy.
The preferential delivery of SIRT to liver tumors via the transarterial approach is based on two anatomic and pathologic factors: the normal liver parenchyma receives ≥75% of its blood from the portal vein, whereas liver tumors derive 80% to 100% of their blood supply from the hepatic artery (see Chapter 2 ); and the neovascularization around tumors leads to increased microvascular density in liver lesions compared with normal liver parenchyma. These features mean that when 90 Y-microspheres are released into the hepatic artery, they will preferentially accumulate in the periphery of tumors in at least a 3:1 to 20:1 ratio compared with a normal liver.
90 Y-microspheres must be deposited in the network of tumor vessels within the tumors. Any particles situated within the afferent tumor vessels, more than 3 mm from the tumor, will not have a direct antitumor effect. For this reason, the particles that are used for SIRT need to be small enough (~20 to 40 mm) to allow optimal penetration and deposition within the tumor plexus, but large enough to prevent the passage of microspheres through the capillary bed into the venous circulation that escapes the liver. The principles and mode of action of SIRT are fundamentally different from transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (see Chapter 94A ); in TACE, the vessels that feed the tumor are filled with chemotherapeutic agents and subsequently embolized with particles to ensure a static, ischemic environment to maximize exposure to those agents and to promote ischemic necrosis. In contrast, optimal perfusion and blood flow are required during SIRT to allow the generation of free radicals by ionization of water molecules near the tumor cell’s DNA.
90 Y is a beta particle that decays to 90 Zr with a half-life of 64.1 hours. An energetic beta particle with maximum energy of 2.28 MeV is released with every disintegration, which generates bremsstrahlung radiation that subsequently allows confirmation by imaging of treatment delivery and distribution with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT). The mean and maximum tissue penetration depth of the beta particle is 2 to 4 and 11 mm, respectively, with greater than 90% of the 90 Y energy distributed within 5 mm of tissue deposition. Uniformly implanted 90 Y of activity 1 GBq within 1 kg of tissue leads to a mean radiation absorbed dose of about 50 Gy.
TheraSphere (Boston Scientific BTG, Minneapolis, MN) is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved microsphere device under humanitarian device exemption for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. It is made of insoluble, biocompatible glass about 20 to 30 microns in diameters and density of 3.3 g/mL. At time of calibration, the microspheres have specific activity of 2500 Bq/sphere. A 3-GBq vial consists of about 1.2 million spheres. Unit dosages of up to 20 GBq are available and the device has a 12-day shelf life from time of calibration.
SIR-Spheres (Sirtex Medical, Boston, MA) is an FDA-approved microsphere device for the treatment of metastatic CRC. SIR-Spheres consist of insoluble, biocompatible resin about 20 to 60 microns in diameters and density of 1.6 g/mL. At time of calibration, the microspheres have specific activity of 50 Bq/sphere. A 3-GBq vial consists of about 30 to 60 million spheres. Unit dosages are 3 GBq with a shelf life of 24 hours. The activity can be used up to 3 days before expiration providing a range of available activities.
All patients should undergo a multidisciplinary clinical evaluation including professionals from interventional radiology; hepatology; medical, surgical, and radiation oncology; and nuclear medicine. Clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory liver function profiling should be examined carefully. In addition, detailed radiologic imaging is needed, showing unequivocal and measurable evidence of hepatic lesions that cannot be surgically resected or ablated with curative intent, and arterial anatomy conducive for hepatic arteriography. The best candidates for SIRT are patients with unresectable liver-only or liver-dominant tumors.
Per the product package insert, the user determines the amount of administered activity based on delivering an average dose assuming uniform particle distribution to total treatment volume. The calculation of the dose requires the volume of the liver to be infused—typically assessed using routine diagnostic CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The mass in kilograms of the treatment volume is then calculated by multiplying the treatment volume by the tissue density. For a prescribed dose (D) in Gy to the target tissue, the activity (A) in GBq to be administered to the target area of the liver, assuming uniform distribution of microspheres, is calculated as follows: A = D × m/50, where m is the mass of the treatment volume in kilograms.
The model of dosimetry for SIR-Spheres is traditionally based on whole-liver infusion. Per the product package insert, the user establishes the amount of administered activity (A) in GBq based on the body surface area (BSA) of the patient in m that is adjusted by the tumor burden as follows: A = BSA − 0.2 + (Tumor volume [L]/Total liver volume [L]). Ideally, the tumor and total liver volumes will be assessed using routine diagnostic CT or MRI.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here