Qualitative and Quantitative Coronary Angiography


Key Points

  • An enhanced understanding of coronary lesion complexity remains a valuable tool for estimating early and late procedural risk after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

  • Aggregate scores that consider the vessel patency and underlying lesion morphology provide the most relevant information for estimating outcome. The SYNTAX trial score, a quantitative assessment of the extent of coronary artery disease, has proven a valuable tool for identifying appropriate patients for multivessel PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting.

  • Longer lesions, thrombus-containing lesions, degenerated saphenous vein grafts, severe tortuosity and angulation, and chronic total coronary occlusions hold the highest risk for procedural failure with PCI.

  • In the setting of acute coronary syndromes, assessment of myocardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion grade is useful in predicting prognosis for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and may be valuable in predicting events in patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Quantitative rather than qualitative indices are preferred to assess the value of new drugs and devices in STEMI patients.

  • While coronary angiography is standard for assessing lesion severity before and after PCI, physiologically intermediate (40% to 70%) lesions require assessment using adjunct modalities, such as fractional flow reserve, due to the complexity of lesion morphology and flow, entrance and exit angles, and stenosis length that are difficult to quantify using qualitative lumen interpretation alone.

  • Reliable and reproducible methods of quantitative assessment of lesion severity have provided important insights into the mechanisms of benefit of new drugs and devices in patients undergoing coronary intervention. The use of novel quantitative programs has yielded three-dimensional imaging methods for precise characterization of total occlusions and bifurcation disease.

  • Late clinical restenosis can be predicted by the quantitative measurement of percent diameter stenosis and late lumen loss in patients undergoing drug-eluting and bare-metal stent placement.

Introduction

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved dramatically over the past three decades, fundamentally altering the management of ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD). Bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) are used in more than 95% of PCI procedures. Coronary arteriography is a fundamental component of PCI, providing prognostic information about baseline lesion morphology and severity, quantification of anterograde perfusion, and adequacy of the final result. Although conventional visual angiography has formed the cornerstone of clinical decision making for patients undergoing cardiovascular interventions, quantitative analyses of procedural and late angiograms have elucidated the therapeutic mechanisms of new devices and drugs and identified the factors predisposing to procedural complications, thrombosis, and restenosis, improving patient selection for these procedures.

The standard criteria used to stratify the baseline procedural risk of patients undergoing PCI are reviewed in this chapter. These criteria have been modified since the availability of DES, and several predictive scores (e.g., SYNTAX trial score) have provided useful tools for deciding between multivessel PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with complex CAD. Newer methods to assess myocardial perfusion beyond coronary flow that provide important prognostic information for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are discussed. The quantitative angiographic methods used for evaluating early and late procedural outcome after PCI are outlined, including the value of these indices as surrogates for clinical outcome in novel stent studies.

Qualitative Angiography

Calculation of the procedural risk for PCI begins with accurate assessment of the complexity of the baseline coronary anatomy. Predictors for an adverse procedural outcome after balloon angioplasty were identified in early series, but a standardized approach to the assessment of lesion morphology in patients undergoing PCI was lacking until the late 1980s. Refinement of these criteria was necessary after the introduction of coronary stents in order to estimate procedural risk, particularly with the continued availability of CABG.

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force, Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, and Mayo Clinic Criteria for Lesion Morphology and Risk Stratification

A joint task force of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) in 2005 established criteria to estimate procedural success and complication rates after balloon angioplasty based on the presence or absence of specific high-risk lesion characteristics. Although these criteria were developed based solely on the task force’s clinical impressions ( Table 64.1 ), their estimates of procedural success and complications closely correlated with the procedural outcomes demonstrated in patients undergoing multivessel balloon angioplasty. Chronic total occlusion, high-grade stenosis, stenosis on a bend of 60 degrees or more, and occlusion location in vessels with proximal tortuosity were associated with adverse outcomes. The most complex lesion morphologies (i.e., type C lesions) were associated with less satisfactory procedural outcomes. Definitions for these variables are provided ( Table 64.2 ).

TABLE 64.1
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Characteristics of Type A, B, and C Coronary Lesions
Modified from Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RP, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol . 1988;12:529–545.
Type A lesions: high success rate (≈85%), low risk
Discrete (<10 mm)
Concentric
Readily accessible
Nonangulated segment (<45 degrees)
Absence of thrombus
Little or no calcium
Less than totally occlusive
Not ostial in location
Smooth contour, no major side branch
No side branch involvement
Type B lesions: moderate success rate (60%–80%), moderate risk
Tubular (10–20 mm long)
Eccentric
Moderate tortuosity of proximal segment
Bifurcation lesion requiring double guidewire
Some thrombus
Moderate to heavy calcification
Total occlusion <3 months old
Moderately angulated (45–90 degrees)
Irregular contour
Type C lesions: low success rate (≈60%), high risk
Diffuse (>20 mm long)
Excessive tortuosity of proximal segment
Extremely angulated segment (>90 degrees)
Total occlusion >3 months old
Inability to protect major side branches
Degenerated vein grafts with friable lesions

TABLE 64.2
Definitions of Preprocedural Lesion Morphology
Variable Definition
  • Eccentricity

Stenosis with one of its luminal edges in the outer one-fourth of the apparently normal lumen
  • Irregularity

Lesion ulceration, intimal flap, aneurysm, or sawtooth pattern
    • Ulceration

Small crater consisting of a discrete luminal widening in the area of the stenosis but does not extend beyond the normal arterial lumen
    • Aneurysmal dilation

Segment of arterial dilation larger than the dimensions of the normal arterial segment
    • Sawtooth pattern

Multiple, sequential stenotic irregularities
  • Lesion length

Measured shoulder to shoulder in an unforeshortened view
    • Discrete

Lesion length <10 mm
    • Tubular

Lesion length 10–20 mm
    • Diffuse

Lesion length >20 mm
  • Ostial location

Origin of the lesion within 3 mm of the vessel origin
  • Lesion angulation

Vessel angle formed by the centerline through the lumen proximal to the stenosis and extending beyond it and a second centerline in the straight portion of the artery distal to the stenosis
    • Moderate

Lesion angulation >45–90 degrees
    • Severe

Lesion angulation >90 degrees
  • Bifurcation

Medium or large branch (>1.5 mm) originates within the stenosis, and the side branch is completely surrounded by stenotic portions of the lesion to be dilated
  • Lesion accessibility

    • Moderate tortuosity

Lesion is distal to two bends ≥75 degrees
    • Severe tortuosity

Lesion is distal to three bends ≥75 degrees
  • Degenerated SVG

Graft characterized by luminal irregularities or ectasia comprising >50% of the graft length
  • Calcification

Readily apparent densities within the apparent vascular wall at the site of stenosis
    • Moderate

Densities seen only with cardiac motion before contrast injection
    • Severe

Radiopacities seen without cardiac motion before contrast injection
  • Total occlusion

TIMI grade 0 or 1 flow
  • Thrombus

Discrete, intraluminal filling defect with defined borders that is largely separated from the adjacent wall; contrast staining may or may not be seen
SVG , Saphenous vein graft; TIMI , thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.

With the improved outcomes associated with the use of coronary stents, contemporary composite risk scores were proposed. The Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Registry evaluated 61,926 patients (of whom 74.5% received stents) from the ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registry and classified their lesions in four groups: non-type C, type C, non-type C occluded, and type C occluded ( Table 64.3 ). These simplified criteria provided better discrimination for success or complications than the ACC/AHA original classification with a C-statistic of 0.69 for success using the ACC/AHA original classification system, 0.71 using the modified ACC/AHA system, and 0.75 for the SCAI classification.

TABLE 64.3
SCAI Classification of Class I Through IV Lesions
Modified from Krone R, Shaw R, Klein L, et al. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the Society for Coronary Angiography and Interventions lesion classification system in the current “stent era” of coronary interventions (from the ACC National Cardiovascular Data Registry). Am J Cardiol . 2003;92:389–394.
Type I Lesion a
  • 1.

    Does not meet ACC/AHA criteria for type C lesion

  • 2.

    Patent

Type II Lesion
  • 1.

    Meets any of the following criteria for type C lesion:

    • Diffuse (>2 cm long)

    • Excessive tortuosity of proximal segment

    • Extremely angulated segments >90 degrees

    • Inability to protect major side branches

    • Degenerated vein grafts with friable lesions

  • 2.

    Patent

Type III Lesion
  • 1.

    Does not meet ACC/AHA criteria for type C lesion

  • 2.

    Occluded

Type IV Lesion
  • 1.

    Meets any of the following criteria for type C lesion:

    • Diffuse (>2 cm long)

    • Excessive tortuosity of proximal segment

    • Extremely angulated segments (>90 degrees)

    • Inability to protect major side branches

    • Degenerated vein grafts with friable lesions

  • 2.

    Occluded

ACC/AHA , American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; SCAI , Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

a Highest success rate expected, lowest risk.

The Mayo Clinic risk score was constructed by adding integer scores for eight morphologic variables, and it was compared with the ACC/AHA risk score for 5064 patients undergoing PCI, of whom 183 (4%) experienced an adverse event (e.g., death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, stroke, emergency CABG). The Mayo Clinic risk score offered significantly better risk stratification than the ACC/AHA lesion classification for the development of cardiovascular complications, whereas the ACC/AHA lesion classification was a better system for determining angiographic success.

SYNTAX Score

The SYNTAX score was developed during the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial to classify patients according to the complexity and extent of CAD. A lesion is defined as significant when it causes a greater than 50% reduction in luminal diameter by visual assessment in a vessel that is more than 1.5 mm in diameter. A multiplication factor of 2 is used for nonocclusive lesions, and a factor of 5 is used for occlusive lesions, reflecting the difficulty of the percutaneous treatment. Up to 12 lesions are identified within the coronary tree, and each lesion is assessed for its severity, including total occlusion (with appropriate characterization) and side branches and their size.

Each lesion is also weighted by its contribution to the myocardial bed that it supplies. In a right-dominant system, the right coronary artery supplies approximately 16% and the left coronary artery supplies 84% of the flow to the left ventricle, of which 66% is supplied by the left anterior descending artery and 33% is supplied by the left circumflex coronary artery. These factors have been included in the weight given to each segment.

Lesions are further graded by their complexity, including multiple tandem lesions, morphology of total occlusions, bifurcation and trifurcation involvement, aortoostial location, diffuse disease and small vessels, severe tortuosity, length greater than 20 mm, heavy calcification, and thrombus. An online algorithm ( http://www.syntaxscore.com ) automatically sums each of these features to calculate the total score.

The SYNTAX score is an important prognostic tool for risk stratifying patients with multivessel disease who are being considered for coronary revascularization. Its predictive value was assessed for 1292 lesions in 306 patients who underwent PCI for three-vessel disease in the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Part II. The rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 370 days was 27.9% in the highest tertile of SYNTAX score and 8.7% in the lowest SYNTAX tertile (hazard ratio = 3.5, P = .001). By multivariable analyses, the SYNTAX score independently predicted outcome and the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Compared with the modified ACC/AHA lesion classification scheme, SYNTAX score showed a better discrimination ability and goodness of fit.

The SYNTAX score has been used to predict outcomes for patients enrolled in DES studies. In an analysis of 819 patients with left main CAD who underwent revascularization in two Italian centers, the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI and CABG were studied. In patients with a SYNTAX score of 34 or less, the 2-year mortality rates were similar for CABG and PCI (6.2% vs. 8.1%, P = .461). Among patients with a SYNTAX score greater than 34, those treated with CABG had lower mortality rates than those treated with PCI (8.5% vs. 32.7%, P < .001). A similar correlation of the SYNTAX score and surgical outcome was not found for patients undergoing CABG.

The value of the SYNTAX score in predicting clinical outcomes has been investigated and validated in other clinical settings, including patients who underwent primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The SYNTAX score is advocated in European and U.S. revascularization guidelines to risk-stratify patients with complex CAD to the most appropriate revascularization modality.

Determining risk based purely on anatomic descriptions without the addition of clinical variables is an important limitation of the SYNTAX score. Patients with equivalent scores may have very different outcomes because of different comorbidities. To address this limitation, attempts have been made to combine clinically based scores with the SYNTAX score. The SYNTAX score II was developed to optimize decisions about the revascularization strategy. It was developed and validated on the basis of a core model consisting of the anatomic SYNTAX score, age, creatinine clearance value, left ventricular ejection fraction, unprotected left main disease, peripheral vascular disease, female sex, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The combination of clinical variables and the SYNTAX score has the best discriminatory value for patients undergoing multivessel PCI.

In an effort to further integrate clinical and angiographic variables into a combined risk score, the Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy–Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (ACUITY-PCI) trial included six factors: insulin-treated diabetes, renal insufficiency, baseline cardiac biomarker elevation or ST-segment deviation, bifurcation lesion, small vessel or diffuse CAD, and extent of CAD. The ACUITY-PCI score had the best discrimination, calibration, and index of separation compared with other risk scores. In a comparative analysis of 2094 patients enrolled in the ACUITY Study, the SYNTAX score; combined clinical variables plus SYNTAX score (CSS); new risk stratification (NERS) score; age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score; Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score; and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) study score were compared for their risk assessment of 1-year mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis for patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. In this analysis, scores incorporating clinical and angiographic variables (i.e., CSS and NERS) showed the best balance between discrimination and calibration.

Risk Assessment Using Specific Lesion Morphologic Criteria

Despite the value of risk scores in estimating aggregate procedural risk, they have several limitations when applied to individual patients. Identification of lesion characteristics, such as eccentricity, irregularity, angulation, and tortuosity, is limited by substantial interobserver variability. Agreement with ACC/AHA classification was found for only 58% of lesions in one series, with disagreement by two classification grades identified for almost 10% of lesions. Similarly, the SYNTAX score suffers from the interobserver variability inherent in visual estimation of disease severity. The weighted κ value for the interobserver reproducibility of the SYNTAX score was 0.45, whereas the intraobserver weighted κ value was 0.59.

Rather than a composite score, the description of individual morphologic features may be more predictive of early and late outcomes after PCI. Some ACC/AHA morphologic features are associated with complicated procedures (e.g., thrombus, saphenous vein graft [SVG] degeneration, angulated segments), whereas others are associated with unsuccessful but uncomplicated procedures (e.g., chronic total occlusions, diffuse disease).

Irregular Lesions

With the advent of coronary stents, the prognostic importance of irregular lesions has been diminished substantially, although identification of an irregular plaque on angiography suggests an acute coronary syndrome and intracoronary thrombus. Semiquantitative and quantitative measurements of lesion irregularity were developed in the early 1990s to better characterize lesion morphology in patients with acute coronary syndromes, but these methods have not found clinical utility independent of other clinical risk factors.

In 65 patients referred for first ACS, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was performed prior to any intervention. IVUS identified 224 lesions, including 115 plaque ruptures, whereas angiography identified 49 suspected plaque ruptures, with a 40% sensitivity and 97% specificity; positive and negative predictive values of angiography for plaque rupture were 96% and 61%, respectively. Proximal coronary location, a wide cavity, and counterflow rupture were strong predictors of correct angiographic diagnoses, enabling four specific angiographic patterns to be identified using three-dimensional (3D) IVUS plaque rupture reconstruction. An aneurysmal or ulcerated lesion was one of several components of a stent thrombosis risk score.

Angulated Lesions

Vessel curvature at the site of maximum stenosis should be measured in the most unforeshortened projection using a length of curvature that approximates the balloon length used for coronary dilation. Although balloon angioplasty of highly angulated lesions is associated with an increased risk of coronary dissection, in the era of coronary stenting, the greatest impediment of angulated lesions is the inability to deliver the stent to the stenosis and straighten the arterial contour after stent placement, which may predispose to late stent fracture. Newer stent designs have leveraged conformability for angulated vessels to provide less vessel straightening after deployment. Prior to the understanding of the deleterious of late scaffold thrombosis, one of the potential advantages of bioresorbable scaffolds had been less vessel straightening than conventional metallic stents, particularly as the scaffold is resorbed over time.

Lesion Calcification

Coronary artery calcium remains an important marker for coronary atherosclerosis. Conventional coronary angiography has limited sensitivity for the detection of smaller amounts of calcium and is only moderately sensitive for the detection of extensive lesion calcium (60% and 85% sensitivity for three- and four-quadrant calcium, respectively). Coronary calcification reduces the compliance of the vessel and may predispose to dissection at the interface between calcified plaque and normal wall after balloon angioplasty. Coronary calcification also reduces the ability to cross chronic total occlusions, and in severely calcified lesions, stent strut expansion is inversely correlated with the circumferential arc of calcium. Patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents who had lesion calcification had higher TLR rates than those who did not. A pooled analysis of seven trials of first- and second-generation DES identified severe calcification as an independent predictor of poor outcome after PCI.

Rotational atherectomy or other ablative technologies are the preferred pretreatment method in patients with severe lesion calcification, particularly ostial lesions; calcium ablation facilitates the delivery and expansion of coronary stents by creating microdissection planes within the fibrocalcific plaque. Even with these contemporary methods, moderate or severe coronary calcification is associated with reduced procedural success and higher complication rates, including stent dislodgment. A novel device, the Diamondback 360 Orbital Atherectomy System (Cardiovascular Systems, St. Paul, MN), used centrifugal action of a diamond-coated crown to modify calcified lesions in a series of 443 patients with severe calcification to facilitate stent placement; stent delivery was successful in 97.7% of cases. In less severely calcified lesions, no difference in the restenosis rate was found after paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in calcified or noncalcified vessels. Calcification in SVGs usually occurs within the vessel wall rather than the lesion and is associated with older graft age, insulin-dependent diabetes, and a history of smoking. Calcified lesions were an independent predictor of stent thrombosis in one series.

Degenerated Saphenous Vein Grafts

SVGs degenerate over time, with 25% occluding within the first year after coronary bypass surgery and 50% developing occlusion within 10 years after surgery, often necessitating repeat revascularization, although these rates have been improved with aggressive lipid lowering therapy. SVGs are the most common site for a culprit lesion in patients with acute coronary syndromes after CABG and account for 6% of all PCIs. PCIs for SVG lesions have been associated with a worse late outcome compared with native vessel interventions. The SVG plaques are particularly prone to distal embolization. The risk of embolic complications appears to be related to the degree of overall graft degeneration and the length and bulkiness of the lesion. The risk of embolization may be reduced with the use of excimer laser atherectomy and with the use of undersized balloons.

Embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been associated with improved angiographic and clinical outcomes in percutaneous SVG interventions. In the landmark Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty Free of Emboli Randomized (SAFER) trial, use of a distal balloon occlusion EPD was associated with a decrease (9.6% vs. 16.5%) in the 30-day composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, emergency CABG, or TLR compared with no embolic protection. Subsequent noninferiority comparisons have demonstrated similar benefit with proximal occlusion and distal filter EPD, with the benefit limited to reduction in periprocedural myocardial infarction. When feasible, the use of EPDs during SVG PCI has been given a class I recommendation in the ACC/AHA PCI guidelines. One exception may be in patients treated for in-stent restenosis (ISR), for which embolic protection may not be required.

Restenosis and TLR rates are lower with DES compared with BMS in SVG interventions, even though mortality and stent thrombosis rates are similar. Self-expanding stents made with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) provide no additional advantage over noncovered balloon-expandable stents in the development of early complications or late restenosis.

Thrombus

Conventional angiography is relatively insensitive for the detection of coronary thrombus, but large thrombus may be visualized in up to 15% to 30% of patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndromes. Angiographic thrombus is usually identified by the appearance of discrete, intraluminal filling defects within the arterial lumen, and it is associated with a 6% to 73% incidence of ischemic complications after PCI. A large thrombus burden is an independent predictor of stent thrombosis in patients with STEMI treated with DES, and it may be managed with intensive anticoagulation therapy before PCI to reduce periprocedural complications.

Primary PCI-related complications of thrombus-containing lesions are distal embolization and thrombotic occlusion, and the risk of angiographic thrombus complications is related to the size of the coronary thrombus. Routine rheolytic thrombectomy provides no benefit in patients with AMI, although it may be useful for patients with a large thrombus burden. Several aspiration catheters have been investigated in patients with AMI and large thrombus burden, but a meta-analysis of three randomized trials involving >18,000 patients undergoing PCI found no difference between PCI with routine aspiration thrombectomy and PCI alone for recurrent myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, heart failure, or target-vessel revascularization.

Traditionally, the extent of coronary thrombus has been determined using the semiquantitative TIMI thrombus grade (TTG). A novel method to assess intracoronary thrombus burden uses the discrepancy of luminal areas assessed with edge detection and video densitometry and measured with the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System II. Thrombus remains an important predictor of outcome after PCI.

Ostial Location

Ostial lesions begin within 3 mm of the origin of the coronary artery, and they are classified as aortoostial or non aortoostial lesions. Balloon angioplasty of ostial lesions is limited by suboptimal procedural outcome, primarily due to technical factors such as difficulties with guide catheter support, lesion inelasticity precluding maximal balloon expansion, and early vascular recoil limiting the acute angiographic result. Debulking techniques such as directional and rotational atherectomy improve compliance of the aortoostial lesion but have had limited effect on preventing late restenosis. Ostial lesions have been associated with higher rates of TLR after DES placement.

DES have become the default therapy for most aortoostial lesions, although there are unique challenges of stent placement in the aortoostial location, such as protrusion of the stent into the aorta precluding subsequent injection catheter engagement, stent compression, and avulsion of the stent struts into the aorta when devices such as cutting balloon angioplasty are used to treat ISR.

Aortoostial lesions remain associated with higher failure rates than non aortoostial lesions. Isolated non aortoostial stenoses of the left circumflex and left anterior descending coronary arteries and ostial side branch bifurcation lesions are also effectively treated with DES, but they pose unique challenges regarding vessel wall geometry, adequate ostial branch coverage (particularly for a narrow angle with the adjacent branch), and plaque shifting causing compromise of the parent or adjacent branch vessels. Whereas stent protrusion into the parent vessel of less than 1 mm is usually well tolerated, greater stent protrusion precludes treatment of the parent branches. Stent fractures have been reported, with more advanced stenting techniques used to treat the parent vessel and ostial side branch stenoses.

Long Lesions

Lesion length may be estimated quantitatively as the shoulder-to-shoulder extent of atherosclerotic narrowing greater than 20%, although many clinicians estimate lesion length based on the identification of a normal-to-normal segment, which is usually longer than the length obtained with quantitative methods. Conventional balloon angioplasty of long lesions has been associated with reduced procedural success, particularly when the segment is diffusely diseased (e.g., >20 mm long), primarily because of the more extensive plaque burden in long lesions.

Stents improve late outcomes compared with balloon angioplasty, but stent and lesion length remain the most important predictors of restenosis in the stent era. Coronary stents have been used to treat suboptimal angiographic results (i.e., spot stenting) and dissections after balloon angioplasty of longer lesions, although the “full metal jacket” stent approach to diffuse disease is associated with a higher recurrence rate in the absence of complete stent expansion, particularly in smaller vessels. Overlapping sirolimus-eluting stents provide safe and effective treatment for long coronary lesions. However, stent length >35 mm remains a risk factor for restenosis and the need for revascularization. Longer stented lesions were associated with stent thrombosis in one series.

In a contemporary analysis of 10,004 patients undergoing surveillance, binary restenosis was detected in 2643 (26.4%) patients. Use of a first-generation DES or BMS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.35) and use of a second-generation DES or first-generation DES (OR = 0.67) were independent predictors of lower rates of restenosis. On multivariate analysis, smaller vessel size (OR = 1.59 for each 0.5-mm decrease), total stented length (OR = 1.27 for each 10-mm increase), complex lesion morphology (OR = 1.35), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.32), and history of bypass surgery (OR = 1.38) were independently associated with restenosis and were similar across the spectrum of stent devices.

Bifurcation Lesions

Bifurcation lesions are common (up to 20% of all PCIs), and their percutaneous management is associated with higher rates of restenosis and thrombosis compared with nonbifurcation lesions. The risk of side branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions is related to the extent of atherosclerotic involvement of the side branch and geometry of the carina.

Several classification systems have been proposed ( Fig. 64.1 ). The Medina classification is the most commonly used and characterizes stenoses in the proximal parent vessel (0 = no disease; 1 = disease), distal vessel (0 = no disease; 1 = disease), and side branch (0 = no disease; 1 = disease). For example, a bifurcation lesion that involves the proximal and distal parent vessel and a side branch with a greater than 50% diameter stenosis is designated Medina 1,1,1, whereas a bifurcation lesion involving only the proximal parent vessel is designated Medina 1,0,0.

Fig. 64.1, Schematic classification systems for types of bifurcation stenoses.

One stent usually is preferable to two stents in the parent vessel and side branch. If two stents are planned for the parent vessel and side branch due to complex bifurcation disease, several stenting techniques are possible, including simultaneous kissing stents, crush and double-kissing (DK) crush, culotte, T, and T-and-protrusion (TAP) stenting. Common to all of these strategies is a final kissing balloon inflation in the parent vessel and side branch, although a sequential two-step dilation of the branch vessel followed by the parent vessel may also be suitable. There is no consensus on which techniques are the optimal treatment strategy for bifurcation lesions.

The origin of the side branch rather than the parent vessel is the most common location of failure (recurrence) after bifurcation stenting, and one study of Medina 0,0,1 bifurcation lesions suggested that a two-stent strategy was associated with lower rates of clinical restenosis than a single-stent strategy. Other studies have suggested that the DK crush technique is superior to Culotte stenting for left main CAD and native vessel bifurcations.

Dedicated bifurcation stents were developed to provide adequate vessel coverage and side branch access, but they have been challenged with their higher profile and difficult delivery. A specifically designed side-branch stent has shown favorable results. Drug-eluting balloons have been used in bifurcation lesions with mixed results.

The angiographic analysis of bifurcation lesions is a challenging task. Although the visual assessment of these lesions is inaccurate, the standard quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) packages designed for single lesions cannot overcome the complexities of the bifurcation lesions. In an effort to address this shortcoming, dedicated bifurcation QCA algorithms have been developed, such as the Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (Pie Medical Imaging, Maastricht, The Netherlands) and QAngio XA (Medis, Leiden, The Netherlands). In a survey of experts in the field of bifurcation PCI, accuracy and precision of visual estimates of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions varied greatly and was less precise compared with the dedicated QCA algorithms, justifying the use of these software packages in clinical and research practice.

Total Occlusion

Total coronary occlusion is identified as an abrupt termination of the epicardial vessel; anterograde and retrograde collaterals may be helpful in quantifying the length of the totally occluded segment. Coronary occlusions are common findings and often lead to the decision to perform coronary bypass surgery rather than PCI in the setting of multivessel disease. The success rate for recanalization depends on the occlusion duration and on certain lesion morphologic features, such as bridging collaterals, occlusion length >15 mm, and the absence of a nipple to guide wire advancement. Although newer technologies have been used to recanalize refractory occlusions, better guidewires and operator and wire techniques have accounted for much of the improvement in crossing success. Simultaneous coronary injections are sometimes useful for identifying the length of the total occlusion ( Fig. 64.2 ). After the occlusion has been crossed, coronary stents have been used to provide the best long-term outcomes. DES usually are preferred to BMS.

Fig. 64.2, Simultaneous coronary injections to visualize contralateral collaterals.

The optimal technique for coronary revascularization is determined using four angiographic parameters: location of the proximal cap, occlusion length, existence of branches and size and quality of the target vessel at the distal cap, and suitability of collaterals for retrograde techniques. On the basis of these four characteristics, there has been a substantial improvement in the ability of the operator to secure access to the coronary vessel.

A key component to the assessment of total occlusion is definition of the collateral grades that provide blood flow to the jeopardized myocardium. The Rentrop classification system includes Rentrop grade 0 (no filling), grade 1 (small side branches filled), grade 2 (partial epicardial filling of the occluded artery), and grade 3 (complete epicardial filling of the occluded artery). Anatomic collaterals summarized by the 26 potential pathways were consolidated into four groups: septal, intra arterial (bridging), epicardial with proximal takeoff (atrial branches), and epicardial with distal takeoff. The size of the collateral connection can be quantified as group 0 (no continuous connection between donor and recipient artery), group 1 (continuous threadlike connection ≤0.3 mm), or group 2 (continuous small, branchlike collateral through its course ≥0.4 mm).

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here