Principles of Antimicrobial Prescription in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Acute Kidney Injury


Objective

This chapter will:

  • 1.

    Identify antimicrobial- and patient-specific factors that may influence antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients.

Description of Antimicrobial Prescribing Practices in the Intensive Care Unit

Antimicrobials are listed consistently in the top 10 drugs prescribed annually in the intensive care unit (ICU), with 70% of patients receiving at least one antimicrobial agent during their stay. Approximately one third of patients receive antimicrobials as combination therapy empirically before de-escalation occurs. Hospital expenditures for systemic antimicrobials in the United States was approximately $3.1 billion dollars in 2010. Vancomycin, piperacillin-tazobactam, levofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and gentamicin accounted for the five most frequently prescribed antimicrobials in the ICU in a study of 183 hospitals in 2011.

There is a difficult balance between over- and underdosing antimicrobials in critically ill patients. The concern for toxicity associated with prescribing too much of an antimicrobial is real, especially for drugs with narrow therapeutic indexes such as aminoglycosides and vancomycin. For both of these antibiotic drug classes, a supratherapeutic trough can result in nephrotoxicity. Prescribing too much of an antimicrobial often occurs because of a decreased clearance, as in the case of acute kidney injury (AKI). Approximately 19% to 67% of drugs are prescribed excessively in kidney disease. Specifically, antimicrobials are dosed higher than recommended in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease and are common causes for AKI as well. A decline in drug clearance forces the clinician to determine the need for a change in dose, frequency, or both to avoid potential toxicity.

The adverse consequences of underdosing antimicrobials is amplified in critically ill patients because of the severity of their illness. An inadequate dose can be the result of improvement in clearance when a patient's renal function recovers and dose adjustment is overlooked. Often we focus on the concern for toxicity and decreasing antimicrobial doses, but when the acute scenario resolves, we may increase the possibility of therapeutic failure resulting from inadequate dose readjustment. Another reason for inadequate dosing is that population-based data providing recommendations for standard dosing do not typically include a critically ill population. Therefore doses may be insufficient for this specialized patient population.

Current studies are gaining better insight into inadequate dosing of antimicrobials in critically ill patients. For example, in the case of β-lactams, an assessment of current dosing indicated that only 16% of patients had antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the pathogen for 50% of the dosing interval and were less likely to have a positive outcome. These inadequate concentrations may be due to increases in volume of distribution resulting from capillary leak and fluid resuscitation during the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Patients with SIRS undergo a hyperdynamic effect from the activation of inflammatory mediators that could result in increased drug clearance. Last, the concept of augmented renal clearance (ARC) may explain the inadequate concentrations of antimicrobials. ARC is defined as a creatinine clearance (CrCl) greater than 120 mL/min and has been associated with subtherapeutic concentrations and worsened patient outcomes. ARC is hypothesized to be a natural response to critical illness in patients with a greater physiologic reserve. Risk factors for ARC include age 50 years or younger, admission for trauma, and a modified Sequential Organ Function Assessment score of 4 or less. Therefore patients with a low estimated CrCl and a high CrCl complicate antibiotic dosing because of the limited available data. This chapter discusses the relevant pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) concepts that must be considered for appropriate antibiotic prescribing in critically ill patients with an emphasis on those with AKI.

Considerations Regarding Antmicrobial Therapy and Acute Kidney Injury

Appropriate Antimicrobial Selection

Selection of antimicrobials is dependent on factors such as the likely microorganisms causing the suspected infection, local resistance patterns to antimicrobials (i.e., institution and ICU-specific antibiograms), likelihood for multidrug-resistant pathogens, a patient's medication allergies, and the potential toxicities of therapy. Antimicrobial therapy should also be (1) initiated as soon as possible after cultures are drawn, especially in sepsis where data has shown an increased risk of mortality by approximately 7% per hour of delay of appropriate antimicrobials and (2) adequate dosing to achieve adequate PK parameters, specific to the antimicrobial chosen. Inadequate therapy has been shown to be an independent risk factor for hospital mortality.

In addition to appropriate initial selection, de-escalation of antimicrobials upon receipt of clinical data is also of importance. Prompt de-escalation of broad-spectrum antimicrobials (i.e., 48 to 72 hours of initiation) has shown to reduce broad-spectrum antimicrobial use and total duration of antimicrobial therapy, without an increase in mortality or recurrent infection. Despite the limitations of rapid diagnostics (e.g., matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization – time of flight [MALDI-TOF], peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization [PNA-FISH]) and surveillance tools (e.g., Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus polymerase chain reaction, procalcitonin, respiratory cultures), these methods may be helpful in aiding with de-escalation, although limited data exist regarding clinical efficacy.

Antimicrobial-Specific Factors

Dosage and dose frequency of antimicrobials are determined by their PK and PD characteristics. Antimicrobials can be characterized into three categories based on PD parameters: concentration-dependent, time-dependent, or a combination of both. The effect of concentration-dependent antimicrobials (e.g., aminoglycosides) depends on the relationship between the peak concentration obtained during a dosing interval and the MIC of the microorganism. These antimicrobials also tend to have a postantibiotic effect, allowing for continued suppression of antimicrobial growth after exposure. Time-dependent antimicrobials (e.g., β-lactams) are dependent on the amount of time that the unbound antimicrobial concentration exceeds the MIC during the dosing interval. Antimicrobials that are dependent on concentration and time (e.g., vancomycin) rely on a combination of both of the aforementioned characteristics. In general, for patients with AKI, retaining the dose is recommended to maximize PD for concentration-dependent agents, while decreasing the frequency of dosing for renally excreted agents for dose adjustment. The opposite is true for time-dependent antimicrobials, with the frequency largely being maintained, while the dose is decreased. To maximize the PD for time-dependent antimicrobials, recent data have evaluated the possibility of extending the infusion or administering a continuous infusion of these agents. Data support extended-infusion (e.g., 3 to 4 hours) in regard to an increased chance of PK target attainment, clinical cure, and a shorter hospital length of stay. Two recent randomized controlled trials (BLISS and BLING II) evaluating continuous infusion of β-lactams, however, found no difference in mortality, when compared to standard administration.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here