Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is a therapy that has the potential to cure or prolong the life of patients with hematologic malignancies as well as certain solid tumors and nonmalignant conditions. High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) preparative regimens are a critical part of the HCT process. The preparative regimen is administered before the HCT and is selected based on patient-, disease-, and transplant-specific factors.
Preparative regimens use myeloablative (MA) properties to eradicate the malignancy or provide sufficient tumor reduction and create space in the bone marrow via ablation. The goal is to use agents that provide synergistic cytotoxicity yet avoid overlapping toxicities. HDC before an allogeneic transplant should also provide an adequate degree of immunosuppression and lymphodepletion to prevent graft rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
In the infancy of HCT, classic HDC preparative regimens included cyclophosphamide (Cy) and total body irradiation (TBI). Recently, a variety of agents such as busulfan (Bu), melphalan (Mel), and fludarabine (Flu) have been added to the armamentarium of cytotoxic agents used in preparative regimens. Today, alkylating agents still make up the MA backbone of most HDC preparative regimens. In addition to chemotherapy or TBI, preparative regimens can also include monoclonal/polyclonal antibodies and/or targeted therapies.
The preparative regimen selected is dependent on:
Fitness of recipient
Age
Performance status
Comorbidities
Graft source
Type of disease or malignancy and chimerism required to cure/mitigate disease
Stage of disease or malignancy
Graft versus tumor/malignancy (GVT) potential
Pediatric patient—consideration of impact on growth/fertility/development
The preparative regimen is given to reduce tumor burden and facilitate engraftment. Increasing dose intensity can improve outcomes by securing prompt donor chimerism (allogeneic) and heightened disease control (in the malignant setting); however, increased intensity yields increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and therefore has little impact on overall survival.
Historically, dose intensity was the focus of HCT, but the field has evolved as knowledge of GVT has increased. Since the early 2000s, efforts were made to exploit GVT while minimizing regimen-related toxicity. These efforts resulted in lowering of TBI dose and/or alkylating agent doses.
Regimen intensity is divided into three categories including MA, reduced toxicity/intensity (RIC), and nonmyeloablative (NMA). Guidance relative to defined TBI and chemotherapy doses for regimen intensity are in Fig. 10.1 .
MA regimens typically consist of a combination of TBI and/or alkylating agents. The doses of these agents cause profound cytopenia that is observed within 7 to 21 days. With MA HDC, autologous recovery does not occur, therefore a stem cell graft is required for count recovery. In addition to pancytopenia, they are also associated with alopecia, stomatitis/esophagitis, diarrhea, and sterility.
MA regimens facilitate rapid and complete engraftment of donor cells; however, these regimens are associated with extreme tissue damage, which leads to increased toxicity and transplant-related mortality (TRM) as well as higher rates of GVHD. The risk of TRM increases with patient age and hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) score, which often limits its use in elderly patients and in those with multiple comorbidities.
RIC regimens are considered an intermediate category and do not fit the definition of MA nor NMA. Compared to MA regimens, RIC regimens have lower TRM and use at least a 30% dose reduction of TBI and alkylating agents. They still result in pancytopenia, alopecia, esophagitis/stomatitis, and sterility; however, the severity and duration of these toxicities may be reduced. The “Champlin Criteria” defines RIC regimens as any regimen that does not require stem cell support for autologous recovery to occur within 28 days, has low nonhematologic toxicity, and produces mixed donor-recipient chimerism in a large proportion of patients by day 30. While autologous recovery is possible without stem cell support, doing so would cause significant morbidity and mortality.
NMA regimens result in minimal cytopenias and do not require stem cell support. These regimens are only used in the allogeneic setting since NMA regimens rely heavily on the GVT effect.
These regimens cause very little early toxicity, which affords elderly patients and those with comorbidities access to HCT. Acute GVHD may be delayed and can develop after day +100. Still, GVHD is still a significant factor in NRM after NMA HCT. Additional distinct differences compared to MA regimens include: less inflammatory cytokine release, immune tolerance from mixed chimerism, shorter duration of immunosuppression, and more antigen presenting cells present after the preparative regimen is complete.
The NMA regimen should be sufficiently immunosuppressive to allow full engraftment using peripheral blood stem cell transplant. Therefore purine analogues and/or antithymocyte globulin is often included in these regimens to aid with immunosuppression.
When selecting the intensity of the preparative regimen, it is important to assess the malignancy for sensitivity to GVT effect as described in Fig. 10.2 . NMA regimens are not as effective in malignancies less sensitive to GVT.
Malignant cells derived from antigen presenting cells, B-lymphocytes, and dendritic cells are often sensitive to GVT effect. A prime example is chronic myeloid leukemia, which possesses all of these features. Lack of costimulatory molecules could contribute to lack of immune response and malignancies with rapid rates of proliferation could be faster than the time to immune response, which is seen with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Characteristics of HDC preparative regimens for HCT include a steep dose-response curve. The ability to use stem cells as rescue allows the HDC regimen to exceed standard doses and maximize myelosuppression. Since TBI has both a steep response curve and myelosuppression, it was one of the first MA agents used in preparative regimens and is commonly used today.
TBI has been used in HCT since the late 1950s and continues to be used today in MA, RIC, and NMA regimens. TBI can eradicate malignant cells, including those in sanctuary sites (testes, brain, etc.) and is also immunosuppressive enough to prevent graft rejection. More details about TBI will be covered in Chapter 15 .
Radioisotope use in HCT was first reported in the mid 1990s in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A beta-emitting radioisotope, holmium-166 1,4,7,10-tetraazycyclodecane-14,7,10-tetramethylenephosphate, was used but it was never studied further in the autologous setting, possibly because of the late toxicities and newer maintenance approaches available post-HCT in MM.
Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) became a therapeutic option for CD20+ B-cell malignancies in the 1990s. RIT agents studied in HCT include 90 Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan ( 90 Y-IT) and I,131 I-tositumomab ( 131 I-T); however, 131 I-T is no longer available. Both 90 Y-IT and 131 I-T have been reported in the autologous and allogeneic settings coupled with HDC preparative regimens. Though the regimens were well tolerated, facilitated engraftment, and responses were promising, no randomized trials were performed to assess survival compared to standard HDC preparative regimens.
Chemotherapy agents are classified as either cell cycle specific or cell cycle nonspecific. The cell cycle has phases including G0; resting phase, G1; growth phase, S; synthesis phase, G2; second growth phase, or M; mitosis phase. A cell cycle specific agent is only able to exert its cytotoxic effect in a certain phase of the cell cycle whereas cell cycle nonspecific agents can kill cells in any phase of the cell cycle. Alkylating agents are cell cycle nonspecific, whereas purine and pyrimidine analogs are cell cycle specific, see Table 10.1 . (See Table 10.3 for pharmacologic properties and toxicities of agents used in preparative regimens and Table 10.4 for examples of commonly used HDC preparative regimens.)
Cell Cycle Specific | Cell Cycle Nonspecific |
---|---|
S phase
|
|
M Phase
|
|
G2 Phase
|
Drug | Doses in HCT | Metabolism | Elimination | Select Toxicities* | Clinical Pearls | Interactions and Mechanism |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alkylating Agents | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nucleoside Analogs | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is a radiosensitizer, avoid within 7 days of radiation |
Topoisomerase II Inhibitors | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Platinum Agents | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxanes | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Myeloablative Regimens | |||
---|---|---|---|
Name | Regimen Details | Transplant Type | Disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Intensity Regimens | |||
---|---|---|---|
Name | Regimen Details | Transplant Type | Disease |
FM100 or FM140 |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Flu-Bu2 |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Flu-Bu |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Flu-Cy-Thiotepa |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Cy-eATG |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Nonmyeloablative Regimens | |||
---|---|---|---|
Name | Regimen Details | Transplant Type | Disease |
Flu-Cy; Flu-Cy-R |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Flu-TBI |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Flu-Ben-R |
|
Allogeneic |
|
TLI + ATG |
|
Allogeneic |
|
Alkylating agents (AAs) were the first agents used in HCT and remain the “backbone” of most preparative regimens because they possess a steep dose-response curve and result in significant myelosuppression. These agents work by crosslinking deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), thereby preventing the division of cells, and can be either monofunctional (crosslink one DNA strand) or bifunctional (crosslink two DNA strands).
Bu is a bifunctional AA and was only available in an oral dosage form until 1996. When used for allogeneic HCT, it has been combined with Cy (BuCy2 or BuCy4) or with Flu (BuFlu). Despite oral Bu’s success with regard to myelosuppression and engraftment, limitations such as erratic absorption and bioavailability led to an increased risk of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) and resulted in a decrease in its use. Bu, when given intravenously (IV), 0.8 mg was equivalent to 1 mg of the oral formulation. In addition, IV Bu had more predictable pharmacokinetics. In 2000 the Bu in BuCy was replaced with the intravenous formulation and rates of SOS decreased.
In 2002, IV Bu was investigated as a once-daily dose rather than divided every 6 hours. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis revealed that the PK of Bu IV was linear, consistent throughout doses, and well tolerated and completely cleared within 24 hours.
Newer dosing strategies aimed at further reducing toxicity, especially in older patients, by fractionating the Bu doses have recently been reported. In this setting, the Bu is given in a PK-guided fashion using a total course area under the curve (AUC) spread out over 6 total days of dosing starting 2 to 3 weeks before HCT.
PK monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes compared to weight-based dosing. Harmonization of Bu plasma exposure units (BPEU) was recently published and proposed using AUC reported in mg*h/L. Examples of AUC and concentration at steady state (Css) reported in Table 10.2 .
Ben was first reported in HCT with a regimen titled BeEAM , whereby Ben was substituted for carmustine in the BEAM regimen. Multiple analyses have since been conducted, and though the newer BeEAM regimen does not cause the unique pulmonary toxicity that is associated with BEAM, there are other notable toxicities, including a high rate of acute renal failure and higher rates of intensive care unit admissions.
Risks for renal failure included higher doses of Ben (> 160 mg/m 2 /day), previous renal injury, and patients over the age of 55 years. To prevent renal toxicity, hyperhydration with at least 3 L/day should be considered. In the allogeneic setting, Ben was given in combination with Flu, rituximab, and antithymocyte globulin-rabbit (for matched unrelated donor HCT) for allogeneic HCT in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma.
Carmustine (BCNU) has long been used in the autologous HCT setting as part of the BEAM regimen. Coupled with thiotepa, it is used in autologous HCT in primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Given its high lipid solubility, BCNU crosses the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and achieves cerebrospinal fluid levels > 50% of plasma.
Cy was one of the first AAs used in preparative regimens for HCT, given in combination with TBI or Bu. In addition, it is also gaining popularity as part of the post-HCT GVHD prophylaxis regimen for certain HCTs.
When given at high doses, 2-mercaptoethane (MESNA) and hyperhydration should be administered. MESNA doses vary, but should be at least 60% of the Cy dose, given intermittently or continuously. Patients should be instructed to void every 1 to 2 hours during Cy administration and consider checking for hematuria with each void. Monitor daily intake/output and weights and diareses as needed to maintain euvolemia. Monitor electrolytes, especially serum sodium and potassium. Hydration status should be assessed, particularly in pediatric patients, by ensuring a urine specific gravity of greater than 1.010 before initiating high-dose Cy.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here