Post-bariatric reconstruction


Synopsis

  • Obesity is a global epidemic with only rising rates. With the rise in bariatric surgical procedures, there has been a concomitant increase in the demand for plastic surgical reconstruction after massive weight loss (MWL).

  • Assessment of the MWL patient begins with a complete history and physical exam. Weight history, past surgical history, and nutritional status are key.

  • Preoperative identification of psychiatric comorbidities is imperative in the MWL population presenting for body contouring.

  • Essential elements of patient management include intraoperative positioning, maintaining body temperature, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, and medical optimization.

  • The abdominal area is the most common area of treatment in MWL patients. Ventral hernias are common – a high index of suspicion must be maintained.

  • In the MWL patient, circumferential truncal body contouring procedures are necessary in many cases to achieve good aesthetic outcomes.

  • Multiple body contouring procedures may be performed safely in combination, depending on patient preference, assistants in the operating room, length of anesthesia time, and the patient's overall medical condition.

Access video and video lecture content for this chapter online at Elsevier eBooks+

Obesity

Definition and epidemiology

Overweight and obesity refer to ranges of weight that are greater than that considered healthy for a given height. The primary measurement for obesity used to categorize patients is the body mass index (BMI). According to the World Health Organization, overweight is defined as a BMI between 25 and 29.99 kg/m 2 . Obesity begins at 30 kg/m 2 with obese class I equivalent to 30–34.99 kg/m 2 . Modifications to the classification have been added, including the categories of super obese (50–60 kg/m 2 ), and super, super obese (>60 kg/m 2 ) ( Table 38.1 ).

Table 38.1
Body mass index (BMI) and obesity classification
BMI (kg/m 2 ) Classification
<18.5 Underweight
18.5–24.9 Normal weight
25.0–29.9 Overweight
30.0–34.9 Class I – obesity
35.0–39.9 Class II – obesity
40.0–49.9 Class III – morbid obesity
50.0–59.9 Class III – super obesity
≥60.0 Class III – super, super obesity

In the US, obesity is increasing at an alarming rate. The US obesity prevalence was 41.9% from 2017 to March 2020. Approximately 9.2% are severely obese. Worldwide, according to the World Health Organization, 39% of adults aged 18 years and over were overweight in 2016, and 13% were obese.

Obesity is an independent risk factor not only for all-cause mortality but also for major diseases including coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, certain malignancies, and musculoskeletal disorders. One cannot ignore the psychosocial ramifications of obesity. Disturbingly, obesity is predicted to overtake smoking as the leading cause of death in the US. Not only does obesity result in lower societal productivity and higher healthcare costs but also rises in patient morbidity and mortality have spurred governmental interventions.

The etiology of obesity is more complex than originally thought. Although some simplify the problem to “more calories in than out”, other factors, including genetics, environment, and psychological factors are influential. Notoriously difficult to treat, obesity is often resistant to many forms of therapy. Gastric bypass procedures have been shown to provide cost-effective, durable long-term weight control in the moderately to morbidly obese, and weight loss procedures have been evolving as guided by. The growing number of bariatric surgical procedures performed has resulted in a higher demand from patients seeking removal of the excess skin and fat that remains following weight loss.

MWL from surgery or diet and exercise alone may be described as weight loss in excess of 50 lb, although weight reduction of more than 100 lb is quite common. Plastic surgeons have pioneered techniques for this population by modifying traditional surgical approaches and techniques in order to appropriately treat the unique deformities found in this emerging patient population.

Methods of weight reduction

Diet and exercise

Diet and exercise play an integral role in any weight loss regimen. Simplified, in order to lose weight, caloric intake must be less than total body expenditure of energy in order to consume endogenous triglycerides. Caloric restriction may take the form of generalized reduction in calories, but may be aided by adjustments in the types of macronutrients eaten (e.g., fats, carbohydrates). A recommended diet of between 1000 and 1200 kcal/day for women, and 1200–1600 kcal/day for men is commonly followed for a target weight loss of 1–2 lb per week. In most cases, an initial weight loss of 10% of body weight over a 6-month period is suggested. Unfortunately, long-term studies have found diet therapy alone is ineffective in the treatment of obesity.

Often coupled with a reduction in caloric intake is physical activity or an exercise regimen. Physical activity is valuable, primarily aiding in long-term weight loss maintenance. Isolated physical activity with no changes in a high-calorie diet is insufficient to cause significant amounts of weight loss.

Pharmacotherapy

The anorectic agents fenfluramine and phentermine have both, in the past, been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as individual agents. However, these drugs are not commonly used to treat obesity due to associations with the development of primary pulmonary hypertension and valvular heart disease.

Currently, weight loss drugs are approved by the FDA for patients who have a BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 , or a BMI between 27 and 29.9 kg/m 2 in conjunction with an obesity-related medical complication. The majority of weight loss medications are anorexiants. Most are only approved for short-term use, and patients typically regain weight once discontinued.

Bariatric surgery

Bariatric surgery in the morbidly obese has been shown to ameliorate and even cure some chronic diseases that have long been considered refractory to medical management. Perhaps the most profound effect of bariatric surgery is the reduction in type 2 diabetes. In 1995, a landmark study by Pories et al . was the first to report significant improvements in glucose control following bariatric surgery. Further studies have demonstrated 83% and 86% resolution rates of type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery. Diabetes resolution was found to occur only days following surgery, well before weight loss was achieved.

Bariatric surgery is noted to be the second most common abdominal procedure performed in the US. Diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and sleep apnea have all been noted to improve following bariatric surgery. Increases in life expectancy have been noted in patients following weight loss. Bariatric surgery results in durable and stable weight loss within 1 year following surgery that is three to four times superior to that achieved with non-surgical treatment.

Indications for bariatric surgery as a treatment of obesity include BMI >40 kg/m 2 , or BMI between 35 and 40 kg/m 2 with a high-risk comorbid condition, failed medical management, multidisciplinary evaluation, a motivated and well-informed patient with realistic expectations, and a commitment to long-term follow-up.

Multiple surgical techniques have been described to treat obesity. The plastic surgeon should understand the various procedures and the effects they may have. Three main categories exist: restrictive, malabsorptive, and a combination restrictive–malabsorptive.

Restrictive procedures produce satiety with the surgical creation of a small gastric pouch with a restricted outlet, thereby restricting food intake. The advantage to restrictive procedures is the reduction in the malabsorption of nutrients seen long-term in malabsorptive procedures. Vertical banded gastroplasty involves the creation of a circular window made in the stomach a few inches below the esophagus. A small vertical pouch is made. Complications include esophageal reflux, stomal narrowing or widening, and less successful results with stable weight loss compared with gastric bypass, which has caused this procedure to fall out of favor.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) had been a popular, purely restrictive bariatric surgery where a band is placed around the upper stomach 1–2 cm below the gastroesophageal junction, creating a 20–30-cc upper gastric pouch. The degree of constriction is adjusted with the alteration in the amount of saline in the band through the subcutaneous port. Because the absorptive surface of the gastrointestinal tract is unaltered, there is a decreased risk of nutritional deficiencies. Excess weight lost ranges from 52% to 68%. The disadvantages of LAGB are less weight loss compared with combination restrictive–malabsorptive procedures and a permanent intra-abdominal foreign body. One of the most serious complications of LAGB is erosion of the device into the stomach, requiring surgical intervention, including removal of the band. The current trend in restrictive operations is the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), and has supplanted the LAGB in popularity as a restrictive operation. In fact, across the US, LGS is the most common weight loss surgical procedure at the time this chapter is written.

Purely malabsorptive procedures divert nutrients and interrupt the digestive process. More common techniques involve both restrictive and malabsorptive mechanisms, rather than malabsorption alone. Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) has evolved to include a limited gastrectomy to reduce stomach size, as well as the creation of a malabsorptive limb, with a 50-cm common channel for absorption. Major complications from BPD include protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, and bone demineralization. While the greatest degree of malabsorption occurs with this procedure, there is also a risk of stomal ulcer formation, frequent and foul smelling stools, and dumping syndrome.

Currently in North America, the most popular malabsorptive bariatric surgical procedure is the gastric bypass, or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Both the size of the stomach and the gastric outlet are restricted. This is a restrictive and malabsorptive combination procedure in which the degree of malabsorption is determined by the length of the jejunum attached to the gastric outlet. Many variations of RYGB are possible.

Late complications of bariatric surgery are most relevant to the plastic surgeon. These include inadequate weight loss, psychiatric conditions, dumping syndrome, and most importantly, nutritional deficiencies. Adequate calorie intake and nutrition is the cornerstone of postoperative healing. Folate, calcium, vitamin B 12 , and iron deficiencies may be seen following bariatric surgery. Daily supplemental vitamins reduce the risk of neurological and hematologic complications. The incidence of peripheral neuropathy following bariatric surgery was 16% in one study. Table 38.2 shows a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of various methods of weight loss.

Table 38.2
Advantages and disadvantages of various methods of weight loss
Method of weight loss Advantages Disadvantages
Diet and exercise Non-invasive Diet modification alone not usually effective in long term
Pharmacotherapy Non-invasive
  • Oily stool

  • Malabsorption of fat-soluble vitamins

  • Fecal incontinence

Bariatric surgical procedure May ameliorate or improve many chronic diseases Invasive
VBG Decreased rates of nutrient malabsorption
  • Esophageal reflux

  • Stomal narrowing/widening

  • Less successful stable weight loss vs. other bariatric surgical procedures

LAGB Adjustable through port Lesser degree of weight loss vs. other bariatric surgical procedures
Decreased rates of nutrient malabsorption Erosion of device into stomach
Absorptive surface of gastrointestinal tract unaltered Removal requires surgery
BPD Both restrictive and malabsorptive mechanisms
  • Protein-calorie malnutrition

  • Anemia

  • Bone demineralization

  • Stomal ulcer formation

  • Frequent/foul-smelling stools

  • Dumping syndrome

RYGB Both restrictive and malabsorptive mechanisms Nutritional deficiencies
Many variations possible Dumping syndrome
BPD , Biliopancreatic diversion; LAGB , laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding; RYGB , Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; VBG , vertical banded gastroplasty.

Incidence and decision-making for body contouring post-bariatric surgery

The burden of obesity is increasingly recognized to continue after the weight is lost, with redundant skin causing functional issues. A study by Reiffel et al . found that only 11.6% of post-bariatric patients chose to undergo body contouring surgery. The most frequent reasons for not opting to have body contouring was cost and lack of awareness of options. Another study by Al-Hadithy et al . demonstrated that 73.4% of patients undergoing bariatric surgery wanted body contouring procedures post-weight loss, while Gusenoff et al . reported an 11.3% plastic surgical rate. It was noted that those patients with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to have post-bariatric plastic surgery. In many instances, plastic surgery in these cases is deemed low priority and funding is either not available or is subject to specific criteria.

Diagnosis/presentation/evaluation

History

Patient evaluation includes a complete medical history. A distinction must be made in the mode of weight loss. Key information to obtain regarding the patient's weight includes:

  • Date and nature of bariatric surgical procedure

  • Maximum, lowest, and current weight and BMI

  • Goal weight

  • Recent (past 3 months) changes in weight status.

Other important history required includes:

  • Past or current tobacco use

  • Prior surgeries

  • Prior pregnancies, plans for future pregnancies

  • Breast history, including prior surgeries, history of cancer, family history, mammographic history, breast biopsies

  • Prior deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, or coagulopathy

  • Psychiatric history

  • General medical issues.

Many patients will have had numerous medical comorbidities prior to weight loss that have improved significantly or since resolved. These benefits commonly occur within 2–5 months following bariatric surgery. Sequelae of gastric bypass must also be assessed, including history of past or current dumping syndrome or prolonged emesis.

Screening for nutritional status is important. Protein intake by history is considered adequate if 70–100 g of protein per day is reported, although serum protein measurement is indicated before post-bariatric body contouring. Following bariatric surgery, protein is one of the major nutrients affected and may be reflected as hypoalbuminemia, anemia, and edema. Although seen in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the most common procedures associated with protein deficiencies are malabsorptive in nature, such as the biliopancreatic diversion. Protein intake is essential for wound healing, especially if multiple contouring procedures are performed. Pre-albumin and albumin levels elucidate issues with protein intake and absorption. Protein supplementation may be required preoperatively.

Deficiencies in nutrients and vitamins, such as thiamine, folate, B 12 , and iron are common. A history of current or past supplementation may screen for this. Nutritional deficiencies are most common in malabsorptive procedures, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion.

Anemia is not uncommon in the MWL population and may be related to generalized or specific nutrient deficiencies. Although iron deficiency is most common, micronutrients such as B 12 , folate, copper, fat-soluble vitamins A and E, or zinc may be deficient and contribute to anemia. A complete hematological workup, including measurement of iron stores, should be performed, especially in high-risk patients. In some cases, iron deficiencies may be refractory to oral therapies and require more aggressive treatment with parenteral iron, blood transfusions, or surgical interventions. Iron deficiency may be seen in association with any gastric bypass procedure.

Physical examination

A generalized physical assessment of the degree of skin excess, distribution of fat, number and location of rolls, and the quality and elasticity of the remaining skin indicates which areas of the body would benefit from contouring surgery. Characteristically, patients will present with predictable patterns of tissue descent around the body.

Zones of adherence, which are tight, non-yielding areas of fascial attachment to the underlying muscular system, act as tethering points from which skin laxity will hang. These areas of restriction are located in the midline of the anterior and posterior trunk and around the pelvic rim. Areas of skin and soft tissue that are farthest in distance from the zones of adherence descend the most following MWL, which in most patients includes the lateral truncal tissues. The estimated skin resections may be simulated by performing “pinch tests”, which may also help determine the translation of pull (distance from the pinched area that tissues are affected).

Scars from prior surgeries are important to document, as a reduction in blood supply may require technical modifications during surgery. Commonly, rectus diastasis may be discovered. Ventral hernias are reducible or non-reducible, and the edges of the hernia may be palpated. A breast examination should be performed, noting masses, position of the nipple–areola complex, and skin envelope quality. Asymmetries are pointed out to the patient. Lateral thoracic skin rolls are noted. Standardized photographs are taken.

Assessment

A proper medical workup is essential. Preoperative clearances from internists, psychiatrists, and other physicians that care for the patient are the rule. Investigations include a chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, complete blood count, coagulation profile, pre-albumin, albumin, pregnancy screen in females of child-bearing age, and mammogram if breast surgery is considered. Abdominal computed tomography in cases of suspected hernias will aid surgical planning.

Patient preoperative counseling and education

Preoperative counseling exploring the patient's goals, expectations, and areas of greatest concern aids in patient selection. Patients are questioned on areas of the body of greatest priority requiring correction, especially when multiple procedures are performed. Education regarding the areas of the body that may be contoured concurrently and discussion as to the appropriate staging of procedures are undertaken. Patients must be made aware of the lengthy scars that occur with large skin resections and must be willing to trade a better contour with the resultant scar.

Education must focus on pre- and postoperative expectations, the length of the surgical procedures, as well as the nature and length of recovery following multiple procedures. As the majority of surgeons use drains in the initial postoperative period, information regarding drain care should be given. Patients must have appropriate social support at home in order for a smooth recovery to occur. No lifting of items heavier than 10 lb is a good rule of thumb for patients undergoing abdominal procedures.

Abstinence from medications that predispose to bleeding, including herbal medications, is important. Tobacco use is a relative or absolute contraindication for body contouring by most surgeons. Smoking cessation helps to minimize flap loss and wound complications such as dehiscence and infection. Although there is no consensus, a commonly used guideline is abstinence from tobacco or nicotine replacement therapies for at least 4 weeks prior to and 4 weeks post-elective cosmetic or reconstructive procedures.

Informed consent is a key element of preoperative counseling. Patients must understand that body contouring after MWL may require multiple stages and possible revisionary surgeries. The surgeon's revision policy must be emphasized to patients and the difference between secondary procedures (further skin tightening) and revisions understood. In general, MWL patients experience mild to moderate amounts of skin relaxation postoperatively, resulting in the need for further skin resections. There is also the possibility of contour irregularities and postoperative “dog-ears” at the extents of resection. A comprehensive guide to informed consent in body contouring patients following MWL is available from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here