Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Poisoning in pregnancy may be accidental or intentional, and may reflect acute (e.g. deliberate overdose, therapeutic error) or chronic (e.g. environmental or occupational) exposure to one or more substances. Whilst risk to both mother and fetus will be determined primarily by the nature of the exposure(s) involved, the greatest risk in managing such patients is likely to arise from delayed, or incomplete treatment of the pregnant woman due to theoretical concerns regarding possible teratogenicity of an antidote or intervention. Whilst it is true that human pregnancy safety data for many of the commonly used antidotes are scarce, that which is available suggests that inadequately treated maternal and/or fetal toxicity correlates with poor fetomaternal outcome.
Robust epidemiological data on fetal and maternal outcome following maternal poisoning are lacking, partly due to the significant number of cases lost to follow-up in this setting. As a result of preferential reporting of cases involving highly toxic substances or which resulted in poor maternal or fetal outcome, any estimates of general risk associated with poisoning in pregnancy are likely to be highly biased towards adverse outcome. Furthermore, much of the published data relates to poisoning in the context of deliberate self-harm or attempted suicide, and data relating to a specific exposure are therefore often highly confounded as co-ingestion of multiple substances, and high rates of elective termination of pregnancy are common in this context ( ).
Risk to the fetus will depend on factors such as the gestational age at which the poisoning occurred, the presence of maternal toxicity, the time interval between poisoning and maternal treatment, evidence of a change in the fetal biophysical profile or wellbeing, and the half-life of the exposure(s) as well as risks due to direct fetal effects of the drug or chemical concerned. Increased risk of miscarriage following overdose periconceptually or in early pregnancy, and of preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital malformation, fetal death or impaired neurodevelopment following poisoning in pregnancy have been reported by some, whereas others have shown no overall increased risk of adverse outcome ( ). These data are however highly limited and confounded. A recent study assessed risk of learning difficulties amongst offspring of mothers who ingested high doses of prescription drugs in an attempted suicide in pregnancy. Although the authors suggest that preparations containing three component medicines may increase the risk of mental retardation in the absence of structural defects, and that this increased risk is not observed for the component medicines when taken alone, these findings are based on one particular preparation and provide little insight into risks for other exposures ( ).
Chronic poisoning may involve exposure over a long period of time, and therefore carries the potential to disrupt structural, functional or neurological aspects of fetal development over more than one trimester of pregnancy. The dose involved in an episode of acute poisoning, although restricted to a narrow window of fetal development, may be more likely to exceed the threshold for a particular adverse effect. In addition to the limitations described above, published and unpublished data on fetal outcome following poisoning in pregnancy are often further compromised due to reports for individual substances being retrospective and few in number; with critical details regarding dose or toxicity scores and presence of maternal toxicity and treatment lacking.
In summary, assessment of risk must be on a case-by-case basis. A thorough assessment of both maternal and fetal condition and possible risk should be made at presentation, and then again following treatment of maternal symptoms. Review by a psychiatrist should be considered in all cases of deliberate poisoning, particularly where the mother is known to have a prior history of mental illness.
There are no published evidence-based guidelines on the treatment of pregnant women who have been poisoned. Recommendations are generally based on the collective experiences gleaned over many years from specialist poisons and teratology centers worldwide, and from analysis of case reports or small case series on specific exposures, although these data are limited. Application of these data to the development of current guidelines is, however, not always appropriate, as in older cases the treatment regimes described are often no longer recommended or in use.
In most situations, treatment of the poisoned pregnant patient should be as for the nonpregnant patient and, where clinically indicated, antidotes or other interventions should not be withheld because of concerns regarding teratogenic effects. However, fetal well-being should be considered during any interventions and procedures. Direct or delayed effects of the toxic agent(s) on the fetus may also occur, and in such situations maternal treatment may need to be initiated or continued in the absence of maternal symptoms (see Carbon Monoxide below). Although the fetal effects of most antidotes are poorly documented, any theoretical risks to the fetus are likely to be less than those associated with failing to treat the mother adequately.
Despite differing opinions regarding the use of one antidote over another, or of a specific intervention, it is universally agreed that timely and adequate treatment of the mother to prevent or minimize maternal toxicity is essential. Maternal condition is a major predictor of fetal outcome and the priority is therefore to stabilize the mother. Maternal resuscitation should be in left tilt, ideally using a wedge or rolled blanket to avoid the obstruction of blood flow in the aorta and inferior vena cava by the gravid uterus. In some situations, early administration of an antidote is key to preventing maternal and fetal demise. Guidelines regarding antidote use, and hence availability may differ across units, and it is therefore advisable to obtain advice from a national or regional specialist poisons service as soon as possible. Early obstetric assessment, and where available, specialist teratological input, is also recommended as emergency delivery or close monitoring of the fetus may be necessary in situations where risk of intrauterine death is increased (see Ibuprofen below).
Once the maternal condition has been assessed and treated as appropriate, the possibility of delayed direct or indirect effects of the exposure on the fetus must be considered. These may occur even in the absence of maternal toxicity and prolonged or additional maternal treatment may be required despite complete recovery of the mother. The possibility of altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of substances, on both mother and fetus, due to the physiological changes associated with pregnancy or differences in fetal metabolism of the substance should also be considered.
Until details of episodes of poisoning in pregnancy are accurately documented and systemically recorded through routine reporting to networks – such as the European Network of Teratology Information Services ( www.ENTIS.org ) or the Organization of Teratology Information Services ( www.MotherToBaby.org ) to enable longer term follow up of maternal and fetal outcome, evidence based guidance regarding treatment in pregnancy cannot be developed.
Reports of arsenic poisoning in pregnancy all involve exposure after the first trimester with variable outcomes. The first describes maternal ingestion of 340 mg of sodium arsenate at 20 weeks, resulting in a healthy live-born at 36 weeks gestation after maternal treatment with 150 mg dimercaprol (4 hourly) 2 hours post ingestion. At birth, 24 hour urinary arsenic levels were <50 μg/L in the infant and <100 μg/L in the mother ( ). The second reports ingestion at 28 weeks of an unknown amount of arsenic with subsequent intrauterine fetal demise, and high arsenic concentrations documented in the fetus ( ). The last case involved a third-trimester ingestion of arsenic-based rat poison. The baby was born live 4 days post-ingestion but then died from hyaline membrane disease. An autopsy showed a high concentration of arsenic accumulation in the liver, brain and kidneys ( ).
Chronic environmental exposure to arsenic may also occur, with populations in West Bengal, Bangladesh, China, Taiwan, Argentina and Chile exposed to drinking water from ground water wells with naturally occurring arsenic levels up to 3,000 mcg/L. A study of Mexican–American women who were exposed to arsenic >10 mcg/L in drinking water, and who lived within 2 miles of a facility with air emissions of heavy metals at the time of conception, showed no increased risk of NTD-affected pregnancies compared to women living near the Mexican border in Texas ( ). Data from other populations suggest an association between chronic exposure to arsenic in drinking water and an increased incidence of maternal anemia, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth and low birth weight ( ). See also Chapter 2.13.19 .
The treatment of suspected arsenic poisoning requires specialist expertise. The risk of toxicity will vary depending on the chemical form involved, and whether the exposure is acute or chronic. Early advice should be sought from a dedicated poisons unit where available. Poisoned pregnant women should be treated according to protocols for the treatment of nonpregnant patients.
Carbon monoxide (CO) crosses the placenta with maximum fetal blood concentrations likely to reach, and in some cases exceed, those of the mother. However, empirical observations, data from animal studies and theoretical models, show that there is a delay of up to 24 hours between maternal exposure and CO accumulating in the fetus. Maternal COHb (carboxyhemoglobin)-concentration may therefore not reflect fetal COHb-concentration at that time. Similarly, the elimination half-life in the fetus may be up to four to five times longer than in the mother.
Maternal COHb-concentrations and symptoms are proposed to predict risk of adverse fetal outcome, and risk of neurological damage in the fetus is thought to be increased if the mother was somnolent or lost consciousness. Fetal death occurred in 10 out of 15 cases where maternal toxicity was reported to be moderate to severe, and associated with loss of consciousness or coma ( ).
However, whilst severe maternal toxicity increases the risk of adverse fetal outcome, low maternal COHb-concentrations do not necessarily correlate with a good fetal outcome, and a threshold for fetal toxicity has not been established. In a case series by , in utero death occurred in two women who were exposed to CO at 38 weeks gestation. Whilst COHb was high, 32% in one woman, it was only 5% in the other. It should, however, be noted that maternal loss of consciousness was reported in both cases.
Reports of acute first trimester CO poisoning are scarce. Pregnancy loss and congenital malformation have been described following early pregnancy exposure associated with moderate to severe maternal poisoning (loss of consciousness or coma) ( ). However, there are no large epidemiological studies on which to accurately assess these risks. Acute CO poisoning in the later stages of pregnancy has been associated with fetal or neonatal death, prematurity and low birth weight ( ).
Chronic exposure to CO in pregnancy (via ambient air pollution or cigarette smoking), has been associated with an increased risk of congenital heart defects ( ), sudden infant death syndrome ( ), and prematurity ( ).
Third trimester in utero exposure to CO via environmental sources (e.g. wood smoke) has been associated with poorer performance in various neuropsychological tests, including long- and short-term memory recall, and fine motor performance amongst school age children ( ).
The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) is controversial in the nonpregnant patient, with use during pregnancy raising further concerns regarding toxic effects such as retinopathy, and premature closure of the ductus arterious in the fetus as a result of high oxygen concentrations. However, the limited published data do not indicate that treatment of pregnant women with HBO poses an increased risk to the fetus, and HBO is advised by some units in cases where maternal COHb-concentration is >20%, or associated with an altered level of consciousness.
There are no published guidelines for the treatment of CO monoxides poisoning in pregnancy.
Maternal treatment as for the nonpregnant patient is advised and should ideally involve discussion with a specialist poisoning or teratology unit.
High-dose oxygen should be administered immediately to reduce the carboxyhaemoglobin half-life. Some centers also advocate the use of HBO in the pregnant woman with severe CO intoxication (reduced consciousness resulting from CO and COHb-concentrations >20%, or abnormal fetal heart rate); however, this recommendation is not universally supported.
Because of the lag in CO accumulation in the fetus, oxygen treatment should be continued even after the maternal condition and COHb-concentration have returned to normal, and should still be commenced following a delay in presentation or spontaneous improvement of maternal symptoms.
The need for enhanced fetal or neonatal monitoring should be considered.
Maternal and fetal effects of methanol poisoning are not immediately evident, owing to the relatively slow metabolism of methanol to toxic metabolites like formaldehyde. Maternal acidosis may therefore be delayed for several hours following ingestion, particularly if alcohol has been consumed simultaneously.
Early treatment of maternal methanol poisoning is therefore key to preventing both maternal and fetal toxicity, and should be as for the nonpregnant patient. Where use of an antidote is clinically indicated, treatment with ethanol or fomepizole to reduce metabolism of methanol to its toxic metabolites should be initiated as soon as possible. Although adverse fetal effects are well described with both regular and “binge” consumption of alcohol during pregnancy, intravenous ethanol should not be withheld if fomepizole is not available and use of an antidote is clinically indicated in the treatment of methanol poisoning at any stage of pregnancy.
The published literature includes only three cases of methanol poisoning in pregnancy. described a pregnant woman with HIV infection and asthma who presented at around 30 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress following methanol exposure due to assumed ingestion. She was acidotic (pH 7.17) with an anion gap of 26, and the fetus was reported to be bradycardic. An emergency caesarean section was performed. The male infant weighed 950 g and required aggressive resuscitation, but died 4 days later following a grade 4 intraventricular bleed. Maternal metabolic acidosis persisted despite treatment with fluids, bicarbonate, and dopamine. Laboratory tests included undetectable ethanol and salicylates and showed an osmolar gap of 41. Intravenous ethanol was only commenced at this stage (3 days post ingestion), when a methanol concentration of 54 mg/dL was detected. The regional poisons service recommended maternal hemodialysis and fomepizole. It is unclear from the report whether this treatment was implemented and maternal death occurred on day 10.
A further report describes mild acidosis in a woman who ingested 250–500 mL methanol during the 38th week of pregnancy. She was treated with ethanol, hemodialysis and alkalinization, and delivered a normal healthy infant 6 days after the exposure ( ). The child was followed up for more than 10 years, during which time clinical course was uneventful and no visual disturbances were reported. The remaining report describes fomepizole treatment at 11 and again at 16 weeks gestation for chronic maternal abuse of methanol ( ). An ultrasound at week 16 did not show any gross congenital abnormalities; however, the case was lost to follow-up and the outcome of the pregnancy is unknown.
Treatment of methanol poisoning in pregnancy should be the same as for the nonpregnant patient, where clinically indicated treatment with fomepizole or ethanol should not be withheld on account of pregnancy. Fomepizole is generally preferred, given the known teratogenic potential of ethanol, but where fomepizole is unavailable or considered to be inappropriate, the risks of untreated methanol poisoning are likely to be far greater than those of ethanol exposure and treatment should not be withheld.
The published data detail approximately 30 pregnancies in which accidental or deliberate exposure to organophosphates (OPs) occurred ( ). Maternal antidote treatment with either atropine ( n = 23) or atropine and pralidoxime ( n = 4) was reported in 27 of these cases.
A case series of 21 women who ingested OPs in pregnancy and were treated with atropine, reported two maternal and fetal deaths, one spontaneous abortion, and 15 healthy live-born infants. Three women were lost to follow-up. In five cases, ventilatory support was needed. In two cases, where exposure occurred at 10 and 20 weeks gestation, the mothers died. Although no congenital malformations were reported, only three exposures occurred in the first trimester ( ). Dilated unresponsive pupils were reported in an infant following maternal ingestion of 15 to 20 mL of diazinon at 40 weeks of pregnancy, and treatment with 83 mg of atropine for 28 hours ( ). A further case report describes maternal ingestion of chlorpyrifos in a suicide attempt at 29 weeks of pregnancy. Atropine was administered over a period of 3 hours and the maternal symptoms resolved. However, premature labor ensued 2 days after the exposure, and the infant died 2 days later due to prematurity and hyaline membrane disease ( ).
There are two published case reports of three normal healthy term infants following use of atropine and pralidoxime in the treatment of maternal ingestion of fenthion at 16 weeks gestation ( ), methamidophos at 36 weeks ( ), and maternal inhalation of undiluted diazinon fumes at 26 weeks ( ). Fetal death has been reported in one case in which the mother was admitted to hospital 12 hours after the ingestion of chlorpyrifos at 19 weeks gestation, as she was unable to feel any fetal activity 2 hours post ingestion. Fetal blood chloropyrifos was 264 ppb ( ).
Treatment should be the same as for the nonpregnant patient, and may involve administration of an antidote such as atropine or pralidoxime. Where maternal OP poisoning occurs near to delivery, the risk of adverse neonatal effects should be considered. Monitoring or treatment of the neonate may be indicated.
Paraquat has been withdrawn from the EU market. The literature regarding acute exposure to paraquat during pregnancy is limited. Eight published reports document paraquat exposure in the third trimester, associated with maternal toxicity which required hospitalization for treatment. Six cases resulted in maternal and fetal death ( ), and survival of both the mother and the fetus was reported in only two ( ).
One case series documents four instances of first or second trimester exposure to paraquat. Maternal and fetal mortality occurred in two cases, maternal survival but fetal death in one, and maternal survival with an elective termination for social reasons in the last ( ).
A case report described delivery of a normal term infant following a reported suicide attempt involving a few sips of Weedol, containing paraquat, at 20 weeks gestation ( ). The placenta showed signs of infarction in the absence of a maternal history of toxaemia or stroke. The child was reported to be healthy at 3 years of age. Maternal toxicity requiring hospital treatment occurred in all the above cases of acute exposure.
Paraquat was found in cord blood at about four times the maternal blood concentration ( ), and ulceration of lips and oral mucosa, pulmonary toxicity and hepatic necrosis has been observed at fetal autopsy ( ) following severe maternal poisoning. In another case, paraquat concentrations in a conceptus were five times those present in the amniotic fluid, and greater than that in maternal blood. Even though maternal ingestion was considerable and accompanied by toxicity, the fetus was viable at three weeks after ingestion, at which stage the pregnancy was electively terminated ( ).
There are no published guidelines concerning the management of paraquat poisoning during pregnancy. Maternal toxicity as a result of exposure in pregnancy is likely to be a major determinant of the risk posed to the developing fetus. Treatment should be in accordance with that recommended for the nonpregnant patient.
Experience of thallium poisoning in the first 13 weeks of pregnancy is limited to a few published case reports. Most describe associated maternal toxicity. In three cases, healthy infants were delivered at term. Two pregnancies resulted in preterm delivery with respiratory insufficiency, cryptorchidism, imperforate anus, jaundice, alopecia and psychomotor impairment at 3 years of age reported in one infant ( ). No maternal symptoms were reported after thallium poisoning around the time of conception in a woman who was treated with gastric lavage, catharsis and Prussian blue , but subsequently miscarried at 9 weeks ( ).
Around 13 cases of thallium poisoning in the second or third trimester of pregnancy have been published. All report associated maternal symptoms, and although the outcome for each was a live born infant. Features consistent with thallium toxicity were reported in some (alopecia in five, dermal effects in two and failure to thrive in three), with some infants having more than one of these features. In one case, maternal ingestion of thallium occurred at term and the neonate subsequently died ( ).
Use of the antidote Prussian blue has only been reported in two separate cases of thallium poisoning in pregnancy. The first resulted in the premature delivery of an infant at 6 months gestation after maternal thallium poisoning, and treatment with Prussian blue at an unknown stage of pregnancy ( ). The second case involved chronic intoxication from thallium-containing rodenticide in the workplace at 13 weeks gestation. The patient was treated with Prussian blue and nutritional support, but fetal loss was reported three weeks later and maternal symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and lumbar and epigastric pain persisted for 6 weeks after the exposure ( ).
Although experience for use of Prussian blue in pregnancy is limited, it should not be withheld if clinically indicated. Prussian blue is not absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, and the risk of fetal effects is therefore likely to be low, whereas the risks to both the mother and fetus of untreated thallium poisoning are significant. Enhanced antenatal monitoring of fetal viability and growth may be advisable following exposure at any stage of pregnancy, and newborn infants should be carefully assessed for systemic features of thallium toxicity, some of which may only manifest around 3 weeks post exposure.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here