Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Randomized studies with greater than 20 years of long-term follow-up data have established equivalent outcomes in patients who undergo mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy. Studies have further shown increased rates of local recurrence with the omission of radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery, and a large meta-analysis has demonstrated an improvement in breast cancer mortality with the addition of radiation therapy to breast-conserving surgery. Historically radiation therapy given via whole breast irradiation (WBI) in earlier clinical trials used bony landmarks and two-dimensional planning techniques. Over the past several decades, WBI has evolved to utilize computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) techniques, which allow for better coverage of targets while sparing adjacent normal organs at risk, including the heart and lungs.
Whole breast radiation was commonly given in multiple daily fractions over a 5- to 6-week period, frequently incorporating a tumor bed boost. Due to the length of treatment, many patients find it difficult to comply with the entire treatment course, with studies showing noncompliance associated with older age, low socioeconomic status, distance from a radiation facility, and receiving treatment during winter months. In fact, the length of treatment impacts whether some patients decide to have breast conservation or a mastectomy. Studies have reported substantial subsets of patients who choose mastectomy over breast-conserving therapy due to an inability or unwillingness to receive adjuvant radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery. Multiple studies have documented that up to 15% to 20% of patients forgo adjuvant radiation therapy, potentially compromising their breast cancer outcomes and survival. Hypofractionated whole breast radiation, which reduces the overall treatment course to 3 to 4 weeks, has become a well-established standard of care with level 1 evidence for clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity, yet many patients continue to seek alternatives that further shorten the duration of radiation therapy. The increasing use of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), which includes a variety of techniques that deliver adjuvant radiation therapy in 1 week or less, has been studied in part to allow greater access to breast-conserving treatment to more patients ( Fig. 48.1 ).
Whole breast radiation is given to eradicate any residual microscopic disease in the breast after surgical removal of the gross disease. Observational studies of patterns of failure in patients who underwent breast conservation have demonstrated that the majority of ipsilateral in-breast tumor recurrences occur within close proximity to the lumpectomy cavity, with lower rates of failures occurring elsewhere in the breast. Multiple studies have confirmed that the development of metachronous new primaries in the breast is not modified by the delivery of whole breast radiation. Pathologic specimen evaluation has quantified residual disease most commonly located within 1 to 2 cm of the surgical cavity after breast-conserving surgery. The concept of partial breast radiation, which involves treating only the breast tissue in the periphery of the lumpectomy cavity rather than the whole breast, is based on these scientific data.
The purpose of this chapter is to describe the evidence-based treatments used in partial breast irradiation, specifically APBI including interstitial brachytherapy, applicator-based brachytherapy, external beam techniques, and intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT).
APBI can be delivered using several different techniques and fractionation schemes, with the most common techniques being interstitial brachytherapy, applicator-based brachytherapy, and external beam techniques ( Fig. 48.2 ). Interstitial brachytherapy represents the original technique with the longest follow-up to date, followed by the development of single-lumen applicators and subsequently multilumen applicators and external beam techniques.
Historically, interstitial brachytherapy was used as a technique for delivering a boost after whole breast radiation, prior to the introduction of electron energies on linear accelerators, and therefore was the first technique studied for use in APBI as monotherapy. There have been several prospective trials looking at APBI using a high dose rate (HDR) interstitial multicatheter system. The historic Hungarian trial using the HDR interstitial multicatheter technique as monotherapy for APBI was conducted from 1996 to 1998. In a series of 45 patients with early-stage disease (tumor <2 cm, negative margins, negative nodes or N1mi, low-grade) with 12-year follow-up, this study demonstrated a 9.3% rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Toxicity rates were low with only 2% of patients experiencing grade 3 fibrosis and 2% having fat necrosis. Overall, 78% of patients had excellent/good cosmesis. Due to the promising results of the study, a randomized trial was designed that compared APBI to whole breast radiation in women with early-stage breast cancer (T1N0-1mi, grade 1–2, nonlobular, negative margins). Radiation on the partial breast arm was delivered with either interstitial brachytherapy (HDR: 36.4 Gy in 7 fractions) or electrons (50 Gy in 25 fractions). No difference in the rate of local recurrence was noted at 10 years, with 5.9% in the APBI arm and 5.1% in the whole breast radiation arm. There were no also differences in disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, or overall survival reported. APBI was associated with improved cosmetic outcomes (81% vs. 63% excellent/good cosmesis).
Several matched pair analyses matched for characteristics including age, size, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, and hormonal therapy have reported similar findings. William Beaumont Hospital compared 199 patients receiving interstitial APBI with 199 patients receiving whole breast radiation and found no significant difference in 12-year outcomes including local recurrence (3.8% whole breast radiation vs. 5.0% APBI). Washington University confirmed these findings with a second matched pair demonstrating 3.8% local recurrence with whole breast radiation vs. 3.0% recurrence with interstitial APBI.
The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9517 was a phase II prospective trial that evaluated interstitial brachytherapy with both low dose rate (LDR; n = 33, 45 Gy over 3.5–5 days) and HDR (n = 66, 34 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily) using multicatheter implants in the periphery of the tumor bed. The study reported 5-year recurrence rates of 3% and 6% for the HDR and LDR brachytherapy cohorts, respectively. Overall, around 66% of patients had excellent/good cosmetic outcomes, and 13% of patients developed grade 3 skin toxicity. These findings have remained stable over time, and several other single-institution prospective and retrospective studies have documented low rates of recurrence and toxicity with high rates of excellent/good cosmetic outcomes. With respect to dose and fractionation, the majority of studies have utilized 34 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily or 32 Gy in 8 fractions twice daily, while the Hungarian randomized study utilized 36.4 Gy in 7 fractions twice daily. In cases where LDR is utilized, 45 to 50 Gy over 3 to 5 days has commonly been administered.
The Groupe Europeen de Curietherapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) clinical trials group conducted a randomized phase III noninferiority trial from 2004 to 2009 for women aged 40 years or older with stage 0, I, or IIA (<3 cm) pN0/Nmi breast cancer, comparing whole breast radiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions with a 10 Gy boost) to APBI using interstitial brachytherapy (30.1–32 Gy in 7 or 8 fractions, or 50 Gy pulsed dose rate). The trial randomized 1328 patients and at 5-year outcomes reported no difference in local recurrence (0.9% whole breast radiation vs. 1.4% APBI) and no difference in survival outcomes, confirming the noninferiority end point. In a subsequent update of late toxicity, these investigators also found similar toxicity profiles among the treatment arms, with a cumulative incidence of any late grade 2 or higher toxicity of 23% after interstitial APBI and 27% after whole breast radiation. Excellent or good cosmesis was rated 90% or higher by both patients and physicians in both arms. Table 48.1 summarizes select prospective multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy APBI studies.
Trial/Institution | Patients (n) | Study Type | Median Follow-Up (months) | Technique | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEC-ESTRO |
|
Randomized | 78 | HDR/PDR | Noninferior: 5-year local recurrence 1.4% APBI vs. 0.9% whole breast; similar grade 2–3 late toxicity |
Multiinstitutional (Germany/Austria) |
|
Phase II | 63 | PDR,50 Gy (175)/HDR, 32 Gy (99) | 5-year local recurrence 2%; excellent/good cosmesis 90%, grade 3+ fibrosis 0.4%/telangiectasia 2.2% |
National Institute of Oncology Hungary |
|
Randomized | 124 | HDR/electrons | 10-year local recurrence APBI 5.9% vs. WBI 5.1%; excellent/good cosmesis APBI 81%, WBI 63% |
William Beaumont Hospital |
|
Matched pair | 127 | HDR | 12-year local recurrences APBI 5.0% vs. WBI 3.8% |
RTOG 9517 |
|
|
73 | HDR (66)/LDR (33) | 5-year local recurrence 6%; excellent/good cosmesis 66%, 13% grade 3 skin toxicity, 15% fat necrosis; 75% patient satisfaction with treatment |
Harvard University |
|
Prospective Phase I/II | 134 | LDR | 12-year local recurrence 15%; excellent/good cosmesis 67%, grade 3/4 skin/subQ toxicity 9%/13%, 54% moderate/severe fibrosis, 35% fat necrosis |
Ochsner Clinic |
|
Prospective Phase I/II | 75 | LDR/HDR | 6-year local regional recurrence APBI 8% vs. WBI 5%; grade 3 toxicity APBI 8% vs. WBI 5% Excellent/good cosmesis APBI 75% vs. WBI 84% |
National Institute of Oncology Hungary |
|
Prospective | 133 | HDR | 12-year local recurrence 9%; excellent/good cosmesis 78%, grade 3 fibrosis 2%; fat necrosis requiring surgery 2% |
While interstitial brachytherapy techniques for APBI have resulted in acceptable clinical outcomes, the insertion technique is technically complex, with only limited centers able to offer this method. Due to these limitations, there was interest in developing more reproducible insertion techniques to deliver brachytherapy-based APBI. In 2002 the first single-entry balloon applicator was approved as a medical device by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), followed by clinical trials using this single-lumen MammoSite (Hologic Inc, Bedford, MA) applicator. Benitez and colleagues published results from the initial safety study of 43 patients and reported no local recurrences at 5 years and 83% excellent/good cosmesis. Toxicity rates were considered acceptable, including a 9.3% rate of infection and a 12% symptomatic seroma rate. One of the most important findings of this study was identifying a skin spacing distance of at least 7 mm to reduce skin toxicity and improve cosmetic outcomes. The safety data from this study led to the prospective American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS) MammoSite Registry, which enrolled 1449 patients from 2002 to 2004. With a median follow-up of 63 months, the 5-year in-breast tumor recurrence rate was 3.8%, with excellent/good cosmesis seen in over 90% of cases. Toxicity rates showed a 9.6% rate of infection, 2.5% rate of fat necrosis, and 13% rate of symptomatic seromas. Similar results have been confirmed in multiple prospective, multiinstitutional, and single-institution studies.
While the initial applicator studies utilized a single-lumen device, development of multilumen applicators allowed for more dosimetric sculpting, with multiple technical studies demonstrating improvements in target coverage as well as reduction in dose to the chest wall, normal breast tissue, heart, and skin when using multilumen balloon devices. Overall, while mature data are limited and cohort sizes are relatively small, studies with these devices have demonstrated low rates of toxicity and excellent clinical outcomes. A multiinstitutional phase IV registry trial of 342 patients treated with multilumen balloons found the local recurrence rate of 2.2%, with a 4.4% rate of persistent seromas and 8.5% rate of infection at 3 years; 88% of patients had excellent/good cosmesis. Brachytherapy APBI using multilumen applicators continues to evolve. The most common dose and fractionation scheme reported is 34 Gy in 10 fractions BID; however, even shorter courses (such as 28 Gy in 4 fractions BID) are being investigated.
A recent multiinstitutional phase II study (BrUOG Br-251) investigated the use of noninvasive image-guided breast brachytherapy (NIBB) to deliver APBI for early-stage breast cancer. Patients who were eligible (age >50 years, ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] <3 cm, invasive tumors <2 cm, ER-positive, no lymphovascular invasion) were treated with ABPI at a dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions delivered daily or twice a day using an Ir-192 high-dose-rate source applicator. In a group of 40 patients, at 5 years 10% of patients experienced grade 2 toxicity; there was no grade >3 toxicity reported. Good/excellent cosmesis was reported in 100% at 5 years. While this study demonstrated a low incidence of toxicity and favorable cosmetic outcomes, further evaluation of APBI using NIBB is warranted given the small size of the study and limited follow-up time.
The TRIUMPH trial investigated the feasibility of using an ultrashort course of APBI brachytherapy. This was a prospective phase II, multiinstitutional trial that treated select breast cancers after breast-conserving surgery with a 2-to3-day course of applicator brachytherapy. Patients who met the criteria (age>45 years, tumor <3 cm, no axillary lymph node metastasis, negative margins, and estrogen receptor– or progesterone receptor–positive) were treated in three fractions of 7.5 Gy to a total of 22.5 Gy with at least 6 hours in between fractions. In a cohort of 200 patients, at a follow-up of 12 months there was one in-breast tumor recurrence; 97.3% of patients had good or excellent cosmesis ,and three patients had grade 3 toxicities. Table 48.2 presents a summary of selected applicator APBI studies.
Trial/Institution | Patients (n) | Study Type | Follow-Up (months) | Technique | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASBS MammoSite Registry | 1449 | Prospective Registry | 63 | Single-lumen | 5-year local recurrence 3.8%; excellent/good cosmesis 91%, 13% symptomatic seroma, 2.5% fat necrosis, 10% infections |
Contura Phase IV | 342 | Prospective Registry | 36 | Multilumen | 3-year local recurrence 2.2%; excellent/good cosmesis 88%, 4.4% symptomatic seroma, 8.5% infection |
TRIUMPH-T | 200 | Prospective | 12 | Multilumen | 1 (8%) in-breast tumor recurrence; 97.25% good/excellent cosmesis |
MammoSite Initial Study | 43 | Prospective | 65 | Single-lumen | 5-year local recurrence 0%; excellent/good cosmesis 83%, 12% symptomatic seromas, 9% infections |
BrUOG Br-251 | 40 | Prospective | 60 | Multiapplicator | 5-year local recurrence 7%; grade 2 toxicity 10%; excellent/good cosmesis 100% |
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here