Introduction to Renal Biopsy


Indication for Renal Biopsy

The first aspiration renal biopsy was performed in 1944. The technique was introduced into clinical use in the early 1950s; however, only in the early 1960s was it considered a valuable and safe diagnostic procedure. The first part of this chapter provides an approach to medical renal disease for residents, fellows, and pathologists. Diagnoses in renal allograft and medical kidney diseases represent a complex integration of clinical data with biopsy light, microscopy immunofluorescence, and electron microscopic findings. Practice guidelines for the handling and processing of renal biopsies have been created. A full understanding of the clinical question and clinical pathologic correlation is important to guide the entire process from the triage of the tissue to the final diagnosis.

Prebiopsy Studies

Complete clinical forms are recommended to accompany the kidney biopsy ( Figure 7-1 as an example). The patient’s medical history, family history, physical examination results, laboratory data concerning renal function, and appropriate serologic studies are important information, not only for the nephrologists but also for the pathologist who interprets the kidney biopsy ( Table 7-1 ).

FIGURE 7-1, Clinical form.

TABLE 7-1
Serology in the Diagnosis of Renal Diseases
Normal Complement ANCA positive No extrarenal disease ANCA-mediated crescentic and necrotizing GN
Perinuclear antineutrophil antibodies
(p-ANCA/MPO)
Respiratory necrotizing vasculitis without granulomas Microscopic polyangiitis
Cytoplasmic anti neutrophil antibodies
(c-ANCA/PR3)
Respiratory necrotizing vasculitis with granulomas Granulomatosis with polyangiitis
Anti-GBM autoantibodies (anti-GBM) No lung hemorrhage Anti-GBM GN
Lung hemorrhage Goodpasture syndrome
Antiphospholipid A2 receptors Primary (idiopathic) Membranous glomerulopathy
Anti–hepatitis B antibodies Hepatitis
Antitreponemal antibodies Syphilis
Carcinoembryonic antigen Tumor
Antithyroid antibodies Thyroid disorders
HIV Collapsing glomerulopathy
Parvovirus B19
IgA fibronectin aggregates IgA nephropathy
κ or λ monoclonal spikes Myeloma cast nephropathy
AL amyloidosis (λ)
Light chain deposition disease (κ)
Low Complement Cryoglobulins Cryoglobulinemic GN
ANA and anti-ds DNA Lupus GN
ANA, anti Scl-70, and
anticentromere
Scleroderma
Antiphospholipid antibodies Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome ± lupus
Verotoxin from E. coli O157:H7 Hemolytic uremic syndrome
Antipathogen antibodies
(e.g., ASO)
Postinfectious GN
Hepatitis C Hepatitis C–associated MPGN
C3 nephritic factor IC or C3-mediated MPGN pattern
AL, primary amyloidosis; ANA, antinuclear antibody; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; ASO, antistreptolysin O; c-ANCA, cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; ds, double stranded; E. coli, Escherichia coli; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; IC, immune-complex; IgA, immunoglobulin A; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; MPO, myeloperoxidase; p-ANCA, perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; PR3, proteinase 3; Scl-70, scleroderma-70 kD.

Clinical Settings in Which the Kidney Biopsy Is Used

Proteinuria

One of the major clinical manifestations of glomerular disease is proteinuria, which is defined as the loss of greater than 150 mg protein in 24 hours. Proteinuria may result from:

  • An increase in plasma protein (e.g., Bence Jones proteins)

  • Altered tubular reabsorption

  • Addition of protein to tubular fluid (Tamm-Horsfall protein)

  • Altered glomerular permeability

Proteinuria can be subnephrotic (<3 g/day) or in the nephrotic range (>3 g/day). Nephrotic range proteinuria may be associated with nephrotic syndrome (NS; Tables 7-2 and 7-3 and Fig. 7-2 ). Isolated subnephrotic proteinuria is a common clinical problem. Little evidence suggests that these patients will have progression to renal failure or be candidates for a specific therapy; however, some of these patients have diagnoses of membranous glomerulopathy; early idiopathic, familial, or secondary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy; metabolic disorders (e.g., diabetes); or hereditary disorders (e.g. Fabry disease or Alport disease; see Table 7-3 ).

TABLE 7-2
Differential Diagnosis of Nephrotic Syndrome
Podocytopathies
  • A.

    Minimal change disease (MCD)

    • Idiopathic

    • Genetically determined

    • Secondary

  • B.

    Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS)

    • Idiopathic

    • Genetically determined

    • Secondary

  • C.

    Mesangial sclerosis

    • Idiopathic

    • Genetically determined

  • D.

    Collapsing glomerulopathy (CG)

    • Idiopathic

    • Genetically determined

    • Secondary

Immune-Complex Glomerular Diseases
  • A.

    Membranous glomerulopathy (MGN)

    • Primary

    • Idiopathic

    • Secondary (autoimmune, infection, cancer)

  • B.

    C1q nephropathy

  • C.

    Others

Generalized Systemic Diseases
  • A.

    Diabetes

  • B.

    Amyloid

  • C.

    Systemic lupus erythematosus

  • D.

    Henoch-Schönlein purpura

TABLE 7-3
Differential Diagnosis of Nonnephrotic Range Proteinuria
Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
  • A.

    Early idiopathic

  • B.

    Associated with a monogenetic disorder (inherited podocyte disease)

  • C.

    Secondary

    • Hyperfiltration (hypertension, obesity, loss of renal parenchyma)

    • Metabolic disorders (Fabry disease, I-cell disease, lecithin cholesterol acyltransferase)

    • Collagen type IV disorders (Alport disease)

Immune-Complex–Mediated and Complement-Mediated Diseases
  • A.

    Immunoglobulin A nephropathy

  • B.

    Glomerulonephritis with proliferative pattern

    • Immune-complex–mediated

      Idiopathic

      Secondary (lupus, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, cryoglobulinemia, postinfectious)

    • Complement-mediated

      C3 glomerulopathy

Generalized Systemic Diseases
  • A.

    Preeclampsia

  • B.

    Diabetes

  • C.

    Amyloid

  • D.

    Systemic lupus erythematosus

  • E.

    Henoch-Schönlein purpura

Tubular Damage
  • A.

    Acute tubular injury

FIGURE 7-2, Algorithmic approach to nephrotic syndrome. FSGS, Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; HIVAN, HIV-associated nephropathy; HSP, Henoch-Schönlein purpura; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgM, immunoglobulin M; LCDD, light chain deposition disease; MCD, minimal change disease; MGN, membranous glomerulopathy; NP, nephropathy; NS, nephrotic syndrome.

Nephrotic Syndrome

NS is a constellation of clinical signs that may be seen in a number of different renal diseases; it is characterized by proteinuria of more than 3 g/day, hypercholesterolemia, hypoalbuminemia, lipiduria, and peripheral edema (see Table 7-2 and Fig. 7-2 ). Children with NS are generally first treated for minimal change disease and undergo renal biopsy if the condition does not respond to steroid therapy. Most nephrologists believe that adult patients with NS should undergo kidney biopsy because most of these patients have renal disease other than minimal change and a correct diagnosis is necessary for an appropriate therapeutic approach.

Hematuria

Hematuria can originate from any segment of the urinary tract. Glomerular hematuria is generally accompanied by red blood cell casts. It may be isolated or found in association with nephritic syndrome ( Figs. 7-3 and 7-4 ). Hematuria can be detected with or without proteinuria. When causes of nonglomerular hematuria are excluded, a renal biopsy is needed to evaluate the nature of the causing glomerular disease (see Fig. 7-3 ).

FIGURE 7-3, Algorithmic approach to hematuria with or without proteinuria. Abs, Antibodies; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; c-ANCA, cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; COL, collagen; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; IC, immune-complex; Ig, immunoglobulin; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; p-ANCA, perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies.

FIGURE 7-4, Algorithmic approach to nephritic syndrome. Abs, Antibodies; c-ANCA, cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; IC, immune-complex; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; p-ANCA, perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies.

Nephritic Syndrome

Nephritic syndrome is characterized by hematuria, red blood cell (RBC) casts, azotemia, hypertension, and oliguria. Patients with proliferative glomerulonephritis generally present with nephritic syndrome, and considering the vast differential diagnosis, a biopsy is necessary. The rationale for a biopsy in these cases is not only diagnosis and management but also evaluation of morphologic features of progression of the disease (activity and chronicity indices) to guide the therapeutic approach (see Fig. 7-4 ).

Acute Renal Failure

Acute renal failure (ARF) is defined as rapidly increasing serum creatinine levels. It can be accompanied by abnormal urine sediment (RBCs, white blood cells [WBCs], RBC casts, WBC casts, or epithelial casts). Approximately 25% of inpatients have ARF develop, and morphologic evaluation is necessary to discriminate between acute tubular injury/acute tubular necrosis, interstitial nephritis, vasculitic processes, thrombotic microangiopathy, and proliferative and crescentic glomerulonephritis ( Fig. 7-5 ).

FIGURE 7-5, Algorithmic approach to acute renal failure. ANCA, Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies; CMV, cytomegalovirus; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; HTN, hypertension; HUS, hemolytic uremic syndrome; IC, immune-complex; IgA, immunoglobulin A; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NP, nephropathy; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; PAN, polyarteritis nodosa; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy.

Chronic Renal Failure

Chronic renal failure is defined as a progressive increase in serum creatinine levels and a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). It may reflect progression from any of the glomerular or tubulointerstitial forms of damage. Chronic renal failure is rarely an indication for renal biopsy.

Evaluation of Fresh Tissue for Triage

For gross evaluation, fresh tissue can be placed in a Petri dish or a grass slide immersed in isotonic saline solution and examined with light microscopy (LM) with a 4× objective for evaluation of the presence of diagnostic tissue (cortex; Fig. 7-6 ). In alternative evaluation, tissue can be examined under the dissecting microscope placed on a thick wax sheet. Different situations may present to the pathologist receiving the biopsy.

  • A.

    Optimal tissue: a minimum of one or two cores of renal cortex, at least 1 cm in length each, are obtained. In this case, a small fragment of cortex, measuring 0.3 to 0.4 cm in length, should be placed in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen for immunofluorescence (IF) studies. One to three fragments of cortex, approximately 0.1 cm each, should be fixed in glutaraldehyde or Karnovsky solution for electron microscopy (EM) studies, and the remaining tissue should be fixed in 10% buffered formalin or other appropriate fixative and processed for LM.

  • B.

    Less optimal tissue: only a small portion of renal cortex is obtained. In this case, the clinical history should guide the pathologist. Generally, in cases of suspected glomerulonephritis, LM and IF should be prioritized. EM can always be performed with reprocessing of the frozen tissue or the formalin fixed tissue, after completion of the LM and IF studies. If necessary, the entire tissue can be fixed in formalin, and IF can be performed on paraffin sections after pronase digestion (see subsequent).

  • C.

    Transplant biopsies. Early transplant biopsies generally do not need EM, unless specified or suggested in the requisition form (e.g., presence of proteinuria). IF and EM studies are advised if the patient received the transplant 6 month to a year before the time of the biopsy to exclude recurrent or de novo glomerulonephritis. In cases of suspected antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), IF can be performed with antibodies (Abs) against C4d on cortex or on a small portion of medulla (see kidney transplant). However, with increase of the allograft survival, there is increased value in evaluation of the status of the interstitial microvasculature with EM for chronic antibody-mediated rejection.

FIGURE 7-6, Fresh tissue. A, Cortex can be discriminated from medulla by the presence of round structures that represent the glomeruli. B, The medulla appears composed of pink and pale stripes that represent tubules and vessels.

Processing and Standard Techniques

Light Microscopy

Paraffin-embedded biopsies are sectioned, with 10 to 12 levels obtained. Each slide or level should contain two to three serial sections that are 2 to 3 μm thick. One sectioning protocol is as follows: stain levels 1, 6, and 12 with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E); levels 2 and 11 with Jones silver stain; levels 3 and 8 with periodic acid–Schiff (PAS); and level 7 with trichrome. The intervening unstained slides can be used for additional studies as needed.

Immunofluorescence

Tissues for IF studies should contain renal cortex and can be received in the renal laboratory in saline solution or in transport medium. IF can be performed on frozen (ideal) or on paraffin sections.

  • A.

    Standard IF panel: Indication: frozen tissue from native kidney biopsies and transplant biopsies (when recurrent or de novo glomerular disease is suspected). The most commonly used panel includes IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, C1q, fibrinogen, albumin, and kappa (κ) and lambda (λ) light chains. Staining with Abs against κ and λ light chains is recommended; not only are they useful internal controls, but they also allow early diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathies or primary amyloidosis.

  • B.

    IgG subgroups: Immunofluorescence stain for IgG subgroups is helpful to discriminate between idiopathic/primary and secondary forms of membranous glomerulopathy. It is also useful for the diagnosis of fibrillary glomerulopathy, especially in the absence of electron microscopy, although alone, it may not be sufficient to fully confirm the diagnosis.

  • C.

    IF on paraffin sections: Indication: no frozen tissue available or absence of glomeruli in the frozen tissue. Paraffin sections are first treated with pronase and then incubated with antibodies against IgG, IgA, IgM, and C1q.

  • D.

    Amyloid panel: Indication: cases with positive Congo red. If IF for κ and λ light chain is negative, secondary amyloidosis should be suspected and IF should be performed with antibodies against amyloid fibril protein (AA).

  • E.

    Alport panel: Indication: presence of thin basement membranes or irregular texture of the glomerular basement membranes (GBMs) on EM in patients with hematuria or hematuria and proteinuria. It includes IF staining with Abs against collagen type IV alpha 1, 3, and 5 alpha chains. A positive control (normal kidney) should be stained simultaneously to compare the intensity of the staining.

  • F.

    When antibody-mediated rejection is suspected, C4d staining can be performed on frozen tissue, preferably medulla to preserve the cortex for microscopic evaluation. A positive control should be stained simultaneously. As a positive control, tissue from a transplant nephrectomy with acute rejection or a lupus membranous glomerulopathy can be used.

Immunohistochemistry on Paraffin Sections

  • A.

    Amyloid panel: Indication: primary amyloidosis (AL) with Abs against κ and λ light chains or secondary amyloidosis with Abs against AA. It is generally more expensive and time consuming than studies on frozen tissue.

  • B.

    Evaluation of tubular casts: Indication: suspected myeloma cast nephropathy (κ and λ light chains), cases of suspected ARF from hemolysis or rhabdomyolysis (with use of Abs against hemoglobin or myoglobin).

  • C.

    Alport panel: Indication: no frozen tissue available when a diagnosis of thin basement membrane disease or Alport disease is suspected. Second choice over IF on frozen tissue.

  • D.

    Suspected virus infection: BK virus. Indication: transplant biopsies with atypical tubular epithelial nuclei. False negative results may result from lack of medulla, where generally the BK virus infection is more prominent. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Indication: posttransplant proliferative disorders. Cytomegalovirus. Indication: transplant biopsies and non–HIV-associated collapsing glomerulopathy (CG; very rare). Parvovirus B19. Indication: non–HIV-associated CG.

  • E.

    Suspected antibody-mediated rejection: C4d staining can also be performed on paraffin tissue with results comparable with IF on frozen section.

  • F.

    Unusual interstitial inflammatory infiltrate: Those that contain atypical lymphocytes or sheets of plasma cell should be investigated to rule out hematologic disorders.

  • G.

    Membranous glomerulopathy: Immunostain for antiphospholipid A2 receptors (PLA2Rs) has been recently introduced to discriminate between PLA2R–associated, formerly known as idiopathic, membranous glomerulopathy and secondary forms.

Electron Microscopy

Whether EM should be performed in all cases of glomerular disease is controversial, although it is recommended. In most cases, EM studies provide confirmation of the diagnosis from LM and IF; but in approximately one third of the cases, the diagnosis is modified by the ultrastructural findings. Ideally, fresh tissue should be fixed in glutaraldehyde. If cortex is not available to be fixed in glutaraldehyde or does not contain glomeruli, frozen tissue or formalin fixed tissue can be reprocessed for EM. Of note: tissue received in transport medium is not well preserved and therefore is suboptimal for EM studies, and thin basement membrane nephropathy is not diagnosed reliably in deparaffinized, formalin-fixed tissue.

Algorithmic Approach to the Renal Biopsy

Figures 7-2 to 7-4 and Tables 7-3 and 7-4 summarize the algorithmic approach to renal biopsy.

TABLE 7-4
Causes of Podocyte Foot Process Effacement
  • Impaired formation of the slit diaphragm complex

  • Abnormalities of the adhesive interaction between podocytes and GBM

  • Alterations of transcription factors

  • Abnormalities of the actin-based cytoskeleton

  • Alterations of the apical domain of podocytes

  • Abnormalities of mitochondrial activities

  • Abnormalities of lysosomal activities

  • Abnormalities of Ca++ intracellular metabolism

  • Abnormalities of metabolic functions

  • Mechanical stress

  • Viral infection

  • Acute ischemic injury/TMA

  • Toxic/metabolic effect

GBM, Glomerular basement membrane; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy.

Glomerular Diseases

Normal Anatomy of the Glomerulus

The glomerular tuft is composed of (1) extracellular matrix: the mesangial tree and the GBM; (2) mesangial cells; (3) fenestrated endothelial cells; and (4) podocytes. Glomeruli sit in the middle of the urinary space, surrounded by Bowman capsule. The inner side of Bowman capsule is lined by parietal epithelial cells.

Filtration Barrier

The filtration barrier is composed of fenestrated endothelium, GBM, and podocytes (on the outer surface; Fig. 7-7 ). Normally the glomerular capillary wall forms an effective barrier to filtration of albumin and other plasma constituents, primarily based on their size and charge.

FIGURE 7-7, A, Light microscopic image of a normal glomerulus (hematoxylin and eosin, 40×). B, With electron microscopy, the filtration barrier is composed of the fenestrated endothelium (arrows), glomerular basement membrane (GBM), and podocyte foot processes connected to each other by the slit diaphragm (arrowheads).

Podocytopathies

The most uniform pathologic finding in podocytopathies is alteration of structure and function of podocytes, which leads to foot process effacement and proteinuria (see Table 7-4 ).

Podocytes

Podocytes are postmitotic cells whose function is based on their complex cytoarchitecture. They contain an actin-based cytoskeleton that is connected to the GBM by alpha 3 β1 integrin and the dystroglycan complex. Podocytes express a variety of quite unique proteins, which are part of the slit diaphragm, the cytoskeleton, the cytoplasm, or the cell membrane. Although protein has a specific function, they work in a synergistic manner to maintain the integrity of the filtration barrier.

Classification

The classification of podocytopathies has evolved over the last 30 years from simple classification systems based on the presence or absence of segmental sclerosis (focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [FSGS] versus minimal change disease [MCD]) to more recent morphologic classifications that include five variants of FSGS (Columbia classification). The definition of FSGS has also changed from original descriptions, in which it was defined as a non–immune-complex–mediated and nonproliferative disease, to the Columbia classification, in which sclerosing segmental glomerular damage and proliferative features are grouped under the common name of FSGS. Morphologic classifications, however, do not account for the complexity of diseases that present with proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome, and the underlying mechanisms and etiologies for diseases with similar morphology are numerous. Similarly, monogenetic disorders, for example, can present with more than one pattern of glomerular injury. Thus it has been suggested that MCD and FSGS should no longer be considered diseases but rather lesions associated with multiple diseases.

A different approach has been taken with the taxonomy of podocytopathies, where morphologic features are integrated with etiology for the classification of nephrotic syndrome. On the basis of morphologic features, four categories of diseases can be identified: (1) normal histology and extensive foot process effacement ( Fig. 7-8 ); (2) diffuse mesangial sclerosis (rare); (3) segmental solidification of the glomerular tuft ( Fig. 7-9 ); and (4) segmental or global collapse of the glomerular tuft with podocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia ( Fig. 7-10 ). Each category is further subclassified based on etiology or podocyte phenotype ( Table 7-5 ). The three most common forms of podocytopathies, minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and collapsing glomerulopathy (CGP), are discussed here.

FIGURE 7-8, Minimal change disease. Electron microscopic image of complete foot process effacement with microvillous transformation.

FIGURE 7-9, Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. A, Tip lesion is characterized by solidification of the tuft at the tubular pole. Foam cells or hyalinosis can be seen. Podocytes are hypertrophic and form bridges with parietal cells. B, Hematoxylin and eosin stain shows a segmental solidification of the glomerular tuft with adhesion to the Bowman capsule (40×).

FIGURE 7-10, Collapsing glomerulopathy. A, Light microscopy with silver staining showing almost global collapse of the tuft with wrinkling and folding of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). The urinary space is occupied by proliferating podocytes that form pseudocrescents. Numerous protein reabsorption droplets are noted in the podocyte cytoplasm (40×). B, Podocytes lose foot processes and primary processes and reveal large cell bodies that directly sit on the outer surface of the GBM, as seen in this electron microphotograph. Occasional detachment of podocytes from the underlying GBM is also noted with interposition of new extracellular matrix. Microvillous transformation and pseudocysts are present. The GBM is wrinkled and folded.

TABLE 7-5
Differences Between Subgroups of Podocytopathies
MCD Mesangial Sclerosis FSGS CGP
Definition Acquired disease Generally congenital Varied etiology
Genetically transmitted
Acquired idiopathic Secondary to hyperfiltration
Severe disease with wide etiology:

  • Viral (HIV, CMV)

  • Drug

  • Ischemia

Incidence 50% of cases of NS in children Rare Most common cause of idiopathic NS Frequency varies among regions within United States; rare in Europe
Gender, race, and age distribution Male predominance
Age: 2-6 y
0-6 y Slight male predominance
More frequent in black adults
Slight male predominance
More frequent in black adults
Clinical presentation NS NS NS or nephrotic range proteinuria Severe NS and increase in serum creatinine value
Pathologic features Normal morphology on LM; extensive foot process effacement and condensation of the actin-based cytoskeleton Immature glomeruli, low proliferative index in podocytes Segmental sclerosis with adhesions and hyalinosis; variable degree of foot process effacement Wrinkling and folding of the GBM with pseudocrescent formation (proliferating podocytes); severe tubulointerstitial damage with microcysts
Prognosis and treatment Generally good response to steroid therapy Poor Dialysis in 6-10 y
Unpredictable response to conventional immunosuppressive therapy
Dialysis in 6 mo to 1 y
Poor response to conventional immunosuppressive therapy
CGP, collapsing glomerulopathy; CMV, cytomegalovirus; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; LM , light microscopy; MCD, minimal change disease; NS, nephrotic syndrome.

Minimal Change Disease and Variants

This condition is sometimes referred to as lipoid nephrosis (for the lipid in the urine and tubules) or nil disease . Several subgroups have been identified:

  • Idiopathic MCD

  • MCD associated with monogenetic disorders

  • MCD associated with ARF:

    • Hemodynamic effect on renal parenchyma

    • Toxic effect of proteinuria on tubular cells

    • Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)–associated

  • MCD associated with malignancy (Hodgkin lymphoma)

  • Diffuse mesangial hypercellularity (DMH)

Epidemiology

MCD is the most common form of nephrotic syndrome in children, although it may also occur in adults. In children, peak occurrence is between 2 and 6 years with a male predominance. It may occur in association with ARF after the intake of NSAIDs or secondary to hemodynamic effects of the NS.

Clinical Features

The classic presentation is rapid development of NS with selective proteinuria (albumin and low– molecular-weight proteins). Renal function and serum complement levels are generally normal (if not associated with ARF). Serology is negative.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

In classic idiopathic MCD, the renal parenchyma is unremarkable. In the elderly, occasional obsolescent glomeruli may be present. Those may be accompanied by small foci of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Approximately 2% to 8% of patients with idiopathic NS have diffuse mesangial hypercellularity. Most authors consider this form a variant of MCD; however, response to therapy and prognosis are less favorable compared with classic MCD. In rare cases, mild mesangial expansion is accompanied by IgM mesangial deposits. Many authors, in the absence of mesangial electron dense deposits, consider the case a MCD if the positive stain at IF is weak but make a diagnosis of IgM nephropathy if the staining with IF is more than 1+ or there are mesangial electron dense deposits with EM. Of note: some authors consider IgM nephropathy a variant of MCD.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

In classic forms of MCD, IF is negative. Weak positive stain in the mesangium for IgM and C3 deposits may be present.

Electron Microscopy

The characteristic feature of MCD is extensive foot process effacement, generally accompanied by reorganization of the actin-based cytoskeleton, which is found condensed at the “sole” of effaced foot processes. In addition, microvillous transformation (cytoplasmic projections) of the luminal side of the foot processes and intracytoplasmic lipid droplets are a frequent finding. Foot process effacement can be partial if the patient has partial response to therapy, which must be documented for such diagnosis (see Fig. 7-8 ).

Differential Diagnosis

The main clinical problem is discrimination between MCD and FSGS. Morphologically the distinction is not difficult if a segmental solidification of the tuft is present; however, in some cases, the segmental sclerosis is very focal and may not be present in the first set of slides examined. A good practice is to section the entire paraffin block to completely exclude FSGS. If foot process effacement is only focal, a diagnosis of MCD should be made with the caveat that FSGS may have been missed with sampling error. The only exception to this rule is if the patient has been already treated with steroid before the renal biopsy; in this case, partial foot process effacement may represent partial response to therapy. Experimental data show that MCD may be discriminated from FSGS based on marked reduction of podocyte dystroglycan expression in MCD versus normal positive staining in FSGS. The differential diagnosis is also with IgM nephropathy, as discussed previously, and IgA nephropathy with minimal glomerular changes by LM. In this case, IF and EM studies are critical.

Prognosis and Treatment

The disease is often very responsive to steroid therapy; however, adults tend to have a slower response to treatment than children. Some of the patients are steroid dependent. If a patient is steroid resistant, FSGS should be suspected; often on follow-up biopsy, segmental sclerosis is present. Children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome often have progression to chronic renal failure. Genetic screening is now advised for all patients in pediatric age with NS because the incidence of monogenetic mutations in NS has shown to be considerable.

Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Segmental sclerosis by itself is a nonspecific pattern of injury. Several forms are identified, and a careful clinical-pathologic correlation is critical to discriminate between the different variants. In particular, idiopathic FSGS should be discriminated from FSGS secondary to hyperfiltration or genetically determined forms because of therapeutic implications. However, the terminology is evolving, and as we learn more about the pathogenesis and etiology of this group of diseases, the terms idiopathic, primary, and secondary either are incorrectly used or need to be redefined.

Epidemiology

FSGS is the most common cause of nephrotic proteinuria in the United States (versus IgA nephropathy in Europe and Asia) and is one of the glomerular lesions that most frequently lead to chronic renal failure. Blacks are at higher risk compared with whites.

Clinical Features

Seventy percent to 80% of the patients have NS; the remaining 20% to 30% have subnephrotic or nephrotic range proteinuria. Proteinuria tends to be nonselective. Occasionally microhematuria may be present; in these cases, thin basement membrane disease or Alport disease should be excluded. Black patients with polymorphisms for APOL1 (apolipoprotein 1) have recently been shown to be at almost 10 times more increased risk for the disease.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

According to the Columbia classification, five variants exist: perihilar, not otherwise specified (NOS), tip lesion, cellular, and collapsing. By definition, the lesions are focal, involving only some of the glomeruli, and segmental, involving only a portion of the glomerular tuft. The classic FSGS lesion is characterized by segmental solidification of the glomerular tuft, accompanied by hyalinosis (protein insudation between the endothelial cells and the GBM) and occasional foam cells. Moreover, adhesion (synechia) of the tuft to the Bowman capsule is typical. Hyalinosis and foam cells are not always present, and the segmental sclerosis may sometimes appear like a segmental accumulation of extracellular matrix with obliteration of capillaries. Podocytes are generally hypertrophic but not hyperplastic. In the early phases, the segment of glomerular tuft involved may appear mildly hypercellular. In FSGS from hyperfiltration, such as that associated with long-standing history of hypertension and obesity or in the presence of a single kidney, glomerulomegaly may be appreciated. The lesions of sclerosis may be at the vascular pole, named perihylar, at the tubular pole, associated with bridging of podocyte between the glomerular tuft and the parietal/proximal tubular cells; this lesion is named tip lesion . Segmental sclerosis can also be away from the vascular or tubular pole (NOS; see Fig. 7-9 ). FSGS is generally accompanied by foci of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. In these areas, a sparse inflammatory infiltrate of mononuclear cell may be present, but it is generally restricted to the areas of fibrosis.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

Nonspecific staining for IgM and C3 is frequently noted in the areas of sclerosis and hyalinosis. This phenomenon does not represent an immune-mediated disease but rather nonspecific entrapment.

Electron Microscopy

The characteristic feature of FSGS is foot process effacement. For a long time, focal effacement was believed to be most likely associated with secondary forms and perihilar sclerosis. However, former definitions of secondary and primary FSGS appear clearly to no longer apply, and these criteria need to be modified accordingly in future classification systems. No morphologic criteria are used for the genetically determined forms, but clinical and family history suggests the diagnosis, which needs to be confirmed with genetic analysis.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis between FSGS and MCD is discussed in the MCD section. Discrimination between FSGS and segmental solidification of the tuft from other glomerulonephritis or healed necrotizing lesions is important. In cases of segmental sclerosis/scar from glomerulonephritis, deposits may be present. Moreover, these patients do not present clinically with new onset of pure NS but tend to have a history of nephritic syndrome or hematuria and subnephrotic proteinuria. Idiopathic FSGS is a diagnosis of exclusion when secondary and genetic FSGS are ruled out (see Table 7-5 ).

Prognosis and Treatment

FSGS is a progressive disease. Patients reach end-stage renal disease within a few years. Negative prognostic factors are widespread glomerular and tubulointerstitial damage, high serum creatinine values, severe proteinuria, steroid resistance, and black race. FSGS may recur in approximately 30% of transplants.

Collapsing Glomerulopathy

CGP was first described as a variant of FSGS; however, the growing belief is that it may represent a separate entity that falls within the category of podocytopathies. The pathogenesis of CGP appears to be related to dysregulation and dedifferentiation of the podocyte phenotype. Several causes of CGP have been identified (see Table 7-5 ).

Epidemiology

CGP was first described in association with HIV infection (called HIV-associated nephropathy [HIVAN] ); in 1986, Weiss described the first few cases of non-HIV CGP (idiopathic CG) . Virus-associated and idiopathic CGPs are generally more frequent in the black population, with a slight male predilection. Other forms of CGP can also occur in Asians and whites and are associated with use of medications such as pamidronate and interferon, vascular damage (severe hyalinosis and thrombotic microangiopathy), myeloma, or other conditions. Idiopathic and virus-associated forms are frequent in young adults or in middle age. Other forms have no predilection for any age.

Clinical Features

CGP is characterized by severe proteinuria or NS with rapid increase of serum creatinine levels.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

The hallmark of the disease is segmental or global wrinkling and folding of the GBM (collapse) with obliteration of the capillary lumina. Overlying podocytes are hypertrophic and hyperplastic (podocytes express Ki67) and form pseudocrescents. They often contain protein reabsorption droplets, which stain in red with the trichrome staining. Rarely, mitosis can be seen. The tubulointerstitial compartment is also severely acutely and chronically damaged. Acute tubular injury, microcysts (dilated tubules with a scalloped outline containing eosinophilic casts) and interstitial inflammation of lymphocytes, monocytes, and plasma cells are noted throughout the entire parenchyma. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are also prominent (see Fig. 7-10 , A ).

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

IF is generally negative, but nonspecific positive staining for IgM and C3 can be present in the areas of collapse. Albumin and Ig often stain protein reabsorption droplets in podocytes and proximal tubular cells.

Electron Microscopy

In addition to the extensive foot process effacement, podocytes often acquire a cuboidal shape (resembling immature precursors) and lose their primary processes. Rather than reorganization and condensation of the actin-based cytoskeleton, cells have a very pale cytoplasm that may also contain numerous protein reabsorption droplets. The major distinction between HIVAN and all the other forms of CGP is the presence of tubuloreticular inclusions (TRIs) in endothelial cytoplasm (see Fig. 7-10 , B ).

Differential Diagnosis

The CGP lesions are often accompanied by segmental and global sclerosis, and some authors consider CGP as part of the spectrum of FSGS (Columbia classification). Regardless of the amount of sclerosis, the diagnosis of CGP is made if at least one glomerulus contains a segmental collapse with pseudocrescents. Pseudocrescents can be difficult to discriminate from real crescents. In general, pseudocrescents are formed by podocytes only and are located around the collapsed glomerular tuft and separated from parietal cells and Bowman capsule by the urinary space; real crescents contain epithelial cells but also inflammatory cells, fibrin, and occasional fibroblasts, and they tend to grow from the Bowman capsule toward the glomerular tuft, from which they are separated by the urinary space ( Table 7-6 ).

TABLE 7-6
Differential Diagnosis in Diseases With Organized Deposits or Nodular Mesangial Expansion
Light Microscopy Congo Red Immunofluorescence Ultrastructural Features
Diabetes Acellular nodules
Silver +
Linear staining for albumin in GBM and TBM Mesangial sclerosis
Thick GBM
Foot process effacement
Primary amyloidosis Acellular nodules
Silver –
+
(+ after pretreatment with KMNO 4 )
Mesangium, GBM, TBM, interstitium, arteries for one of the light chains (λ) Nonbranching randomly arranged fibrils (8-11 nm)
Secondary amyloidosis Acellular nodules
Silver –
+
(– after pretreatment with KMNO 4 )
Mesangium, GBM, TBM, interstitium, arteries for AA or other proteins Nonbranching randomly arranged fibrils (8-11 nm)
Fibrillary Mesangial expansion, mildly hypercellular, thick irregular GBM IgG (IgG 4 isotype)
and C3 in mesangium and GBM
Nonbranching randomly arranged fibrils (12-30 nm)
Immunotactoid Mesangial expansion, mildly hypercellular, thick irregular GBM IgG and κ or λ
C3 in 50% of cases
GBM and mesangium
Nonbranching parallel arranged microtubules in subepithelium, mesangium, and subendothelium (10-90 nm)
Cryoglobulinemia MPGN with hyaline thrombi IgG or IgM and C3
In type I, only κ or λ
Microtubules in mesangium, subendothelium, and subepithelium (25-35 nm)
LCDD Acellular nodules with glassy thick GBM and TBM κ and more rarely λ
Linear staining in GBM and TBM
Granular electron densities in the inner side of the GBM
AA, Amyloid fibril protein; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; LCDD, light chain deposition disease; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; TBM, thin basement membrane.

Prognosis and Treatment

Idiopathic and virus-associated CGPs generally have a poor prognosis. Idiopathic and HIV-associated forms may respond to steroids and cyclosporin. For other forms of CGP, therapy should target the cause of the disease.

Membranous Glomerulopathy

Membranous glomerulopathy (MG) can be idiopathic or associated with other diseases, including autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis, or inflammatory bowel diseases; hepatitis B infection; syphilis; occult cancer; toxins; and medications (gold, mercury, and d-penicillamine). The term idiopathic has recently been revisited, as up to 75% to 80% of patients with idiopathic membranous glomerulopathy have circulating autoantibodies against phospholipase A2 receptors (PLA2R). Membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) is the most common de novo glomerulopathy in renal transplants.

Epidemiology

MGN is one of the most common causes of NS in adults and elderly without diabetes. It is rare in children.

Clinical Features

Patients generally present with severe proteinuria and NS.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

In early stages of the disease, glomeruli may appear unremarkable on light microscopy. The most characteristic feature is uniform thickening of the glomerular capillary walls as a result of the deposition of immune complexes in the subepithelium. The trichrome stain may sometimes reveal fuchsinophilic subepithelial deposits. In intermediate stages of the disease, the silver stain, which stains extracellular matrix black, reveals spikes and holes in the GBM. The spikes represent the interposition of newly formed extracellular matrix in between the deposits (optically clear on silver staining). As the disease progresses, holes in the GBM are more prominent; the holes represent the deposits fully immersed in the extracellular matrix. In later stages, the deposits are reabsorbed and the GBM remodeled. If there is concomitant mesangial expansion or hypercellularity, the possibility of secondary MGN should be investigated ( Fig. 7-11 , A ).

FIGURE 7-11, Membranous glomerulopathy. A, Light microscopy with silver staining shows thick glomerular basement membrane (GBM) with spikes and holes that indicate the presence of numerous subepithelial deposits (40×). B, Granular global staining in the capillary loops for immunoglobulin G. C, Electron microscopy reveals numerous electron dense deposits in the subepithelial space. Occasionally, deposits are partially embedded in the extracellular matrix, corresponding to the spikes noted on light microscopy. D, In more advanced stage of the disease, deposits are partially reabsorbed and fully embedded in the GBM. GBM remodeling also occurs late in the disease.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

The classic picture of MGN is global and diffuse granular deposits along the GBM that stain for IgG and C3 ( Fig. 7-11 , B ). More recently, IF staining for IgG subgroups, including IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4, and immunohistochemistry for PLA2R have been introduced into routine renal pathology practice. The stain for IgG1 to IgG4 helps in discriminating idiopathic forms (IgG4 and less frequently with less intense staining IgG1) from secondary forms (IgG1 to IgG4 in lupus, for example). Immunostaining for PLA2R is helpful in identifying PLA2R-associated forms, although some overlaps exist and positive stain is on occasion found in clinically obvious secondary forms.

Electron Microscopy

Pathognomonic of MGN is the presence of numerous subepithelial electron dense deposits. In early stages, they

MEMBRANOUS GLOMERULOPATHY—FACT SHEET

Definition

  • Primary (idiopathic): associated with circulating antibodies against PLA2R

  • Secondary to other disease (hepatitis B, autoimmune, syphilis, tumor, drugs)

  • Characterized by IgG and C3 granular deposits in the subepithelial region, thick GBM on LM, and subepithelial electron dense deposits

Incidence

  • Most common cause of NS in white adult and elderly

Gender, Race, and Age Distribution

  • Middle-aged white adults

Clinical Features

  • NS

Prognosis and Treatment

  • 25% of the patients have spontaneous remission

  • 50% of the patients have persistent proteinuria

  • 25% of the patients have renal failure

  • The treatment is controversial

GBM, Glomerular basement membrane; IgG, immunoglobulin G; LM, light microscopy; NS, nephrotic syndrome; PLA2R, antiphospholipase A2 receptor.

MEMBRANOUS GLOMERULOPATHY—PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Light Microscopy

  • Diffusely thick GBM

  • Spikes and holes on silver stain

  • Mesangial expansion possible in secondary forms

Immunofluorescence and Immunohistochemistry

  • Granular global deposition of IgG and C3 in the GBM

  • Granular positive stain for PLA2R antibodies in PLA2R-associated forms

Ultrastructural Features

  • Electron dense granular deposits in the subepithelium

  • As the disease progresses, deposits are partially and later completely immersed in basement membrane

  • Reabsorption of the deposits and remodeling of the GBM in late stages

  • Mesangial expansion and occasional mesangial deposits in secondary forms

Differential Diagnosis

  • The most important discrimination is between idiopathic and secondary forms

GBM, Glomerular basement membrane; IgG, immunoglobulin G; PLA2R, antiphospholipase A2 receptor.

can be very small, and EM is the most reliable technique for diagnosis of MGN (stage I). In later stages of the disease, electron dense deposits are separated from one another by protrusion of newly formed basement membrane (spikes; stage II) or completely surrounded by glomerular basement membrane (stage III). As the disease progresses, the electron dense deposits are reabsorbed (stage IV) often with rarefaction that results in remodeling of the GBM ( Fig. 7-11 , C and D ).

Differential Diagnosis

The most important differential diagnosis between idiopathic MGN is with secondary MGN. The presence of mesangial expansion and mesangial deposits may suggest secondary MGN; however, idiopathic MGN can be diagnosed if all other conditions are clinically excluded.

Prognosis and Treatment

MGN is a slowly progressive disease. Bad prognostic features include high blood pressure, severe proteinuria, and the presence of associated segmental sclerosis and interstitial fibrosis. MGN can recur in renal transplants.

Diabetic Nephropathy

Type I diabetes is a metabolic disorder that affects the microvasculature. The disease affects children and adolescents and is the result of autoimmune destruction of the β cells in the islets of Langerhans. Type II diabetes is the result of failure of the β cells to meet the increasing demand for insulin in the blood. This form has a late onset in life and is more common in obese patients.

Epidemiology

Diabetes is the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States.

Clinical Features

Microalbuminuria starts to develop, and with time, proteinuria becomes more severe, up to nephrotic range. The disease is often accompanied by the presence of hypertension. Evaluation of the retina is a good indicator of progression of the disease at the level of the microvasculature. In the absence of retinopathy and the presence of proteinuria, renal biopsy is indicated to rule out other causes of glomerular disease.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

Four stages of diabetic nephropathy have been recently suggested ( Table 7-7 ).

  • Stage I: No changes with LM or only minimal prominence of the mesangium, but thick GBM with EM.

  • Stage II: The diagnosis of stage II diabetic nephropathy is made if with LM, most glomeruli have global mesangial expansion with or without hypercellularity. With EM, these lesions are characterized by mesangial sclerosis and diffuse thickening of the GBM.

  • Stage III: Mesangial sclerosis with a nodular pattern is the most classic feature (Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodular sclerosis). The nodules are initially mildly hypercellular; however, with time, they tend to be hypocellular and have a laminated appearance. Nodules are composed of collagen and therefore stain black with silver stain ( Fig. 7-12 , A ). The capillary walls are thickened, and occasional microaneurysms are also noted. Lesions are also accompanied by the accumulation of hyaline material, which can be found in the glomerular tuft (fibrin caps) or in Bowman capsule (capsular drops).

    FIGURE 7-12, Diabetic nephropathy. A, Silver staining shows nodular mesangial expansion. The nodules are hypocellular and silver positive. Occasionally, microaneurysms of the glomerular capillaries can also be noted (40×). B, On electron microscopy, the mesangial nodules are hypocellular and the glomerular basement membrane are always thickened.

  • Stage IV: Characterized by extensive global sclerosis that involves the majority of glomeruli. Globally sclerotic glomeruli tend to be large and with abundant hyalinosis. Another characteristic feature is the severe arteriolar hyalinosis that involves both afferent and efferent arterioles. As in all diseases with proteinuria, proximal tubules may contain protein reabsorption droplets. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy is also a common feature. Tubular basement membranes of nonatrophic tubules are generally thickened and have a laminated appearance. A nonspecific inflammatory infiltrate accompanies the areas of fibrosis. If the inflammation is dense or rich in neutrophils or eosinophils, other diagnoses should be considered, such as superimposed pyelonephritis or allergic interstitial nephritis.

TABLE 7-7
Diabetic Nephropathy: Morphologic Staging RPS 2010
Glomeruli with LM GBM with EM
Stage I No morphologic changes to minimal prominence of mesangium Thick
Stage IIa and IIb Diffuse mesangial expansion (silver +) with or without mild mesangial cell hypercellularity Thick
Stage III Nodular glomerulosclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson nodules; silver +) Thick
Stage IV 50% of glomeruli globally sclerotic with hyalinosis
The remaining glomeruli should have diffuse mesangial sclerosis or nodular glomerulosclerosis
Often cannot be evaluated because glomeruli are globally sclerotic; otherwise thick
EM, Electron microscopy; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; LM, light microscopy; RPS , renal pathology society.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence is generally negative or nonspecific. The most common and consistent finding is linear positive staining in the glomerular and tubular basement membranes for albumin and IgG. Nonspecific deposition of IgM and C3 can be seen in the areas of hyalinosis.

Electron Microscopy

The earliest sign of diabetic nephropathy is thickening of the GBM up to 1000 to 3000 nm (normal thickness in adults varies between 300 and 350 nm). Mesangial sclerosis is also a common feature. When prominent nodules are present, they may appear formed by fibrillary material ( Fig. 7-12 , B ).

Differential Diagnosis

Histologically, diabetic nodules have to be differentiated from idiopathic nodular sclerosis, light chain deposition disease, amyloidosis, fibrillary or immunotactoid glomerulonephritis (GN), and resolving membranoproliferative GN (MPGN). Differently from diabetic nephropathy, in idiopathic nodular glomerulosclerosis (common in nondiabetic heavy smokers), significant hyalinosis is not seen in glomeruli and arterioles. Nodules from deposition of material other than collagen do not stain black on silver staining; moreover, in light chain deposition disease and primary amyloidosis, immunofluorescence shows positive staining for only one of the light chains. In secondary amyloidosis, not only are the nodules silver negative, but they stain positive for AA amyloid or other amyloid proteins. Diabetic nodules are Congo red negative. Fibrillary and immunotactoid nodules are Congo red negative as well but generally do not stain strongly positive on silver; and on electron microscopy, the nodules are composed of fibrils that measure approximately 12 to 30 nm in diameter (fibrillary), which are positive for IgG, or organized microtubular structures that measure approximately 10 to 90 nm in diameter (immunotactoid) and are positive for Ig and either κ or λ light chains (see Table 7-6 ).

Prognosis and Treatment

Diabetic nephropathy is a slowly progressive disease. Presence of hypertension (HTN) and severe proteinuria are negative prognostic factors.

DIABETES MELLITUS—FACT SHEET

Definition

  • Metabolic disorder that affects microvasculature as a result of high levels of glucose

Incidence

  • Major cause of renal morbidity and mortality

  • One of the leading causes of chronic renal failure in the United States

Gender, Race, and Age Distribution

  • Type I diabetes is common in adolescents and young adults of northern European descent

  • Type II diabetes is more common in adults and the elderly, especially Native Americans

Clinical Features

  • The disease first manifests with increased GFR and microalbuminuria; later, nephrotic range proteinuria appears

  • Slow progression to renal failure

  • HTN is a common feature

Prognosis and Treatment

  • Control of the blood glucose and ACE inhibitors retard progression

  • HTN and sever proteinuria are negative prognostic factors

  • ESRD occurs in 30% of patients with type I diabetes mellitus and 20% of patients with type II

  • Type I diabetes accounts for 20% of deaths in patients younger than 40 years

  • Most patients with ESRD are maintained in dialysis, and only a few receive renal transplant

  • Diabetic NP may recur after transplant

ACE, Angiotensin-converting enzyme; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HTN, hypertension; NP, nephropathy.

DIABETES MELLITUS—PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Microscopic Findings

  • Diffuse thickening of GBM

  • Nodular glomerulosclerosis

  • Glomerular microaneurysms

  • Hyalinosis (fibrin cap and capsulary drops)

  • Interstitial fibrosis

  • Tubular atrophy

  • Mild interstitial inflammation

  • Hyalinosis of both afferent and efferent arterioles

Immunofluorescence

  • Linear staining in GBM and TBM for IgG and albumin

Ultrastructural Features

  • Idiopathic nodular sclerosis

  • Light chain deposition disease

  • Amyloidosis

  • Fibrillary or immunotactoid GN

  • Resolving MPGN

GBM, Glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; IgG, immunoglobulin G; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; TBM, thin basement membrane.

Glomerular Diseases Characterized by Intracapillary Proliferation and Obliteration of the Capillary Lumina

Immunoglobulin a Nephropathy and Henoch-Schönlein PurpUra

IgA nephropathy (NP; Berger disease) and Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) are two very similar diseases that are characterized by mesangial deposition of IgA and complement. In addition to mesangial proliferation and deposits, HSP is also characterized by systemic vasculitis. Some authors consider IgA NP a variant of HSP that is limited to the kidney.

Epidemiology

IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerular disease in the world, especially in Asia and Europe; it is rare in blacks.

Clinical Features

Hematuria (microscopic and occasionally macroscopic) is always present and is sometimes accompanied by nephritic syndrome. In some cases, proteinuria (subnephrotic or nephrotic in 10% of the cases) is the presentation. Patients with HSP also have symptoms related to the vasculitis: abdominal pain, purpura, and joint pain. The renal disease is often exacerbated by infections of the respiratory or gastrointestinal tract.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

Mesangial expansion and mesangial cell proliferation is the most characteristic finding. However, the morphologic presentation is variable, and glomeruli may appear normal on light microscopy and may have lesions that resemble focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, mesangial expansion and proliferation, segmental to diffuse endocapillary proliferation with double contours, and occasionally, extracapillary proliferation and necrosis. Histologic diversity has led to several classification systems. The 2009 Oxford classification was a result of an international committee to develop an evidenced-based consensus that identified four histologic parameters: M (M0 or M1 for mesangial hypercellularity in <50% versus >50% of glomeruli), E (E0 or E1 for endocapillary hypercellularity in 0 or >1 glomerulus), S (S0 or S1 the latter for any tuft sclerosis not involving the entire glomerulus), T (T0, T1, T2 for <25%, 26% to 50%, or >50% of cortical area involved by interstitial fibrosis or tubular atrophy respectively; Fig. 7-13 , A ).

FIGURE 7-13, Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy. A, Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) shows global mesangial expansion with mesangial cell proliferation (60×). B, On immunofluorescence, large mesangial deposits are positive for IgA. C, Electron microscopy shows mesangial and perimesangial electron dense deposits.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

Invariably IgA and C3 are present, generally with a mesangial distribution but occasionally in the capillary walls with a semilinear pattern. In approximately one third of the cases, C1q is also present ( Fig. 7-13 , B ).

Electron Microscopy

Electron dense deposits are invariably present in the mesangial and paramesangial areas. Subendothelial and rarely sparse subepithelial electron dense deposits can be observed ( Fig. 7-13 , C ).

Differential Diagnosis

IgA nephropathy can mimic a large variety of diseases morphologically, from lupus nephritis class II, to FSGS, to MPGN, and the IF is necessary to discriminate between these disorders and IgA nephropathy. IgA-dominant acute postinfectious glomerulonephritis, in particular Staphylococcus infection–associated glomerulonephritis, is a

IMMUNOGLOBULIN A NEPHROPATHY—FACT SHEET

Definition

  • Glomerular disease characterized by mesangial expansion and mesangial cell proliferation accompanied by mesangial deposition of IgA and C3

Incidence

  • Most common glomerulopathy in the world

Gender, Race, and Age Distribution

  • Male predominance

  • Incidence is high in whites and Asians

  • Age of distribution is adolescents and young adults

Clinical Features

  • Microhematuria and occasionally macrohematuria

  • Nephritic syndrome

  • 10% nephrotic syndrome

Prognosis and Treatment

  • 20% have renal failure in 10 years

  • Rarely resolves but rather has episodic course

  • Frequently recurs in transplant

IgA, Immunoglobulin A.

IMMUNOGLOBULIN A NEPHROPATHY—PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Light Microscopy

  • Mesangial proliferation (very common)

  • Occasional double contours with endocapillary proliferation

  • Segmental sclerosis

  • May have extracellular proliferation; more common in HSP

  • Scoring according the Oxford classification (MEST) includes presence of mesangial (M) endocapillary (E) proliferation, segmental sclerosis (S), and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (T)

Immunoflurescence

  • Mesangial IgA and C3

Ultrastructural Features

  • Mesangial and paramesangial electron dense deposits

Differential Diagnosis

  • Class II lupus nephritis

  • Focal and proliferative GN

GN, Glomerulonephritis; HSP, Henoch-Schönlein purpura; IgA, immunoglobulin A.

known mimicker of IgA nephropathy. This type of glomerulonephritis mainly affects hypertensive elderly patients often with diabetes mellitus and has an abrupt onset of acute kidney injury; most patients have known positive infections.

Prognosis and Treatment

IgA nephropathy is a slowly progressive disease. Negative prognostic factors are high blood pressure, severe proteinuria, and high serum creatinine values. On the contrary, the prognosis of HSP, particularly in children, is more favorable. In approximately 50% of patients, IgA NP recurs in the transplant.

Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis

MPGN is a glomerular injury pattern seen in a variety of diseases from idiopathic to secondary in association with infection (hepatitis C virus), indolent bacterial infections, cryoglobulinemia, and neoplasms. Histologically, what was known as idiopathic MPGN was historically divided into types I, II, and III based on the histologic appearance, regardless of the presence of immune-complex (IC) or C3 alone in the deposits; the different morphology in type II, also named dense deposit disease (DDD); and type III with less proliferative features. Newer classification systems have been recently proposed based on a better understanding of the underlying dysregulation of the complement cascade for some of these entities. These newer proposals are based on separating these historic patterns of injury into immune-complex–mediated (IF immunoglobulin-positive) MPGN that may occur with increased levels of circulating immune complexes versus complement-mediated (IF immunoglobulin-negative) MPGN that reflects activation of the classic complement pathway versus the alternative complement pathway cascade. With these criteria, IC-mediated MPGN corresponds to the former type I and III, with positive stain for Ig and C3 with IF, and C3 glomerulopathy, which can resemble histologically the former MPGN type I or III, named now C3 glomerulonephritis, or DDD, named C3 glomerulopathy.

Epidemiology

Idiopathic MPGN is more common in children, whereas secondary forms, discussed subsequently, are more common in adults. Recent advances in the role of dysregulation of the alternative pathway of complement in the pathogenesis of MPGN-type patterns of glomerular injury with IF immunoglobulin negative reactivity underscore the proposed new histopathologic classification.

Clinical Features

Mixed nephrotic and nephritic syndrome is the common presentation; hypocomplementemia is almost always present. Patients with type I MPGN may also have positive serology for nephritic factor. In adult patients, secondary forms are more common, especially those associated with hepatitis C virus infection.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

MPGN patterns of glomerular injury are characterized by lobular accentuation from mesangial expansion and mesangial cell proliferation, endocapillary proliferation composed of swollen endothelial cells and variable degrees of inflammatory cells that lead to obliteration of the capillary lumina and capillary wall remodeling with double contours. Double contours are formed by interposition of mesangial cell cytoplasm and deposits between two layers of the capillary basement membrane. The outer layer represents the original GBM, and the inner layer is newly formed by the endothelium, resulting in a “tram track” appearance. Double contours are best seen on silver stain where both layers of the GBM are silver stain positive and the deposits and mesangial cell cytoplasm are silver stain negative. Extracapillary proliferation (i.e., crescents) may be present ( Fig. 7-14 , A ). Type II and III patterns of injury are generally less proliferative forms than type I MPGN. In particular, type II (dense deposit disease) is characterized by thickening of the capillary walls, which stain strongly with PAS and trichrome but are negative on silver stain ( Fig. 7-15 , A ).

FIGURE 7-14, Immune-complex-mediated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. A, Silver staining shows large hypercellular glomeruli with numerous double contours. The capillary lumina are obliterated by endocapillary proliferation (40×). B, Immunofluorescence reveals deposition of immunoglobulin M in the capillary walls with a semilinear pattern that indicates subendothelial location. C, Electron microscopy shows double contours formed by interposition of mesangial cell cytoplasm, with partial obliteration of the capillary lumen. Mesangial expansion and proliferation is also present.

FIGURE 7-15, C3 glomerulopathy. Dense deposit disease. A, Light microscopy of a glomerulus with a ribbon-like thickening of the capillary walls and mild proliferation. The glomerular basement membrane (GBM) is partially silver negative because of the presence of deposits. B, On electron microscopy, electron-dense bands replace the extracellular matrix of the GBM. The electron-dense areas correspond to the pink areas noted on silver staining.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

Large glomerular capillary wall (semilinear pattern) deposits with more granular mesangial deposits are characteristic ( Fig. 7-14 , B ). When the deposits are positive for IgG, IgM, and C3, the lesions are immune-complex mediated (typically those MPGN previously classified as MPGN I and III). When there are C3 deposits only (without immunoglobulin reactivity), the glomerular pattern of injury can mimic the condition formerly known as MPGN I or III or DDD ( Fig. 7-15 , B ).

Electron Microscopy

Electron dense deposits are present in the subendothelium, mesangium, and occasionally subepithelium (sparse; Fig. 7-14 , C ). Mesangial expansion and obliteration of glomerular capillaries with the presence of endocapillary proliferation may occur and includes inflammatory cells, in particular luminal macrophages with phagolysosomes. Light microscopy double contours correlate with capillary wall mesangial cell interposition and subendothelial deposits. Type II MPGN is characterized by ribbon-like electron dense deposits substituting the GBM (see Fig. 7-15 , B ).

Differential Diagnosis

MPGN can mimic a variety of diseases, and clinical information needs to be integrated with IF and EM. The most difficult discrimination is between idiopathic MPGN and postinfectious GN (PIGN). A positive antistreptolysin O (ASO) titer and the presence of typical humps (in PIGN) should help to discriminate between the two. Lupus nephritis can also present with MPGN pattern, but in this case, the clinical history or positive laboratory tests of lupus, positive IF for all Ig and complements, and the presence of tubuloreticular inclusions (TRIs) in endothelial cells guide the diagnosis. In cryoglobulinemia, the presence of monoclonal (type I) organized deposits should help in the diagnosis. IgA NP with MPGN pattern shows IgA and C3 positive staining rather than IgG and C3. Other possible diseases that resemble MPGN are light chain deposition disease (LCDD), diabetes, and transplant glomerulopathy. Neither immunoglobulin nor complements are detected with IF in these latter cases.

Prognosis and Treatment

MPGN is a progressive disease with high recurrence in transplant.

PROLIFERATIVE GLOMERULONEPHRITIS (MEMBRANOPROLIFERATIVE GLOMERULONEPHRITIS PATTERN)—FACT SHEET

Definition

  • Immune-complex–associated MPGN or C3-mediated glomerular disease, idiopathic or secondary to other diseases or underlying genetic abnormalities of complement cascade

  • Characterized by alteration of the GBM, proliferation of glomerular cells, and inflammation

  • Localization of immune complexes and electron dense deposits in the mesangium and capillary walls

Incidence

  • 5% of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children, although the most common presentation is nephritic syndrome

  • More common in underdeveloped countries

Clinical Features

  • Nephritic syndrome or nephrotic syndrome or a combination of the two

  • Low serum complement levels

Prognosis and Treatment

  • Persistent progressive disease

  • 50% of the patients progress to end-stage renal disease

  • High recurrence in transplant

GBM, Glomerular basement membrane; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis.

IMMUNE-COMPLEX–MEDIATED MEMBRANOPROLIFERATIVE GLOMERULONEPHRITIS PATTERN—PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Light Microscopy

  • Mesangial cell proliferation

  • Endocapillary proliferation, including endothelial cells and inflammatory cells with obliteration of the capillary lumina

  • Double contours of the glomerular capillary basement membrane

  • Subendothelial deposits

  • Occasional extracapillary proliferation (crescents)

Immunofluorescence

  • IgG and C3, occasionally IgM, in mesangium (granular) and subendothelium (semilinear deposits)

Ultrastructural Features

  • Mesangial and subendothelial deposits; occasionally, subepithelial deposits are also present

  • Mesangial cell proliferation

  • Endothelial cell proliferation

  • Double contours

  • Podocyte foot process effacement

Differential Diagnosis

  • Proliferative IgA NP

  • Lupus nephritis class IV

  • Postinfectious GN

  • Dense deposit disease and C3 glomerulonephritis

  • Monoclonal IgG GN

GN, Glomerulonephritis; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IgM, immunoglobulin M; NP, nephropathy.

C3-MEDIATED MEMBRANOPROLIFERATIVE GLOMERULONEPHRITIS PATTERN—PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Light Microscopy

  • C3 glomerulonephritis

    • Mesangial cell proliferation

    • Endocapillary proliferation, including endothelial cells and inflammatory cells with obliteration of the capillary lumina

    • Double contours

    • Subendothelial deposits

    • Occasional extracapillary proliferation (crescents)

  • Dense deposit disease

    • Mild proliferation in the presence of segmentally or globally thickened GBM (DDD)

Immunofluorescence

  • C3 in mesangium (granular) and subendothelium (segmental linear deposits)

  • Immunoglobulin negative

  • Doughnut-like appearance (DDD)

Ultrastructural Features

  • C3 glomeruloneophritis

    • Mesangial, subendothelial, and subepithelial electron dense deposits

    • Mesangial cell proliferation

    • Endothelial cell proliferation

    • Double contours

    • Podocyte foot process effacement

    • Remodeling of the GBM and subepithelial electron dense deposits (former MPGN type III pattern)

  • Dense deposit disease

    • Ribbon-like electron dense deposits substituting the GBM in DDD

Differential Diagnosis

  • Proliferative IgA NP

  • Lupus nephritis

  • Postinfectious GN

  • Dense deposit disease versus C3 glomerulonephritis and vice versa

  • Monoclonal IgG GN, light chain nodular glomerulopathy

  • Diabetic glomerulosclerosis

DDD, Dense deposit disease; GBM, Glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NP, nephropathy.

Postinfectious Glomerulonephritis

Epidemiology

The acute form of postinfectious (poststreptococcal) GN is less frequent in the United States but still common in underdeveloped countries. Poststreptococcal GN is more common in children, whereas other forms of postinfectious GN, secondary to endocarditis, deep visceral abscesses, or infected atrioventricular shunts, are more frequently seen in adults.

Clinical Features

The classic presentation is nephritic syndrome. Children have development of renal symptoms 2 to 3 weeks after an upper respiratory infection, generally caused by β-hemolytic streptococcus. Hypocomplementemia and positive serology for ASO are also common findings.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

Glomeruli are enlarged and hypercellular with obliteration of the capillary lumina from endocapillary (endothelial cells) proliferation and exudation (especially neutrophils). Mesangial expansion and proliferation and double contours are infrequently present. In the most aggressive cases, extracapillary proliferation (crescents) is present. The tubular interstitial compartment may also be affected, with erythrocytes seen in tubular lumina and peritubular capillary inflammatory cells. Interstitial inflammation is also frequently noted.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

The disease is the result of deposition of circulating immune complexes formed by antibodies to streptococcal antigens and complement. IgG and C3 staining, or sometimes C3 alone, is seen with a granular lumpy-bumpy appearance. Deposits are in the capillary walls and in the mesangial areas (starry sky pattern).

Electron Microscopy

The most characteristic finding is the presence of large, usually sparse subepithelial deposits (humps); smaller subendothelial and mesangial electron dense deposits are also common ( Fig. 7-16 ).

FIGURE 7-16, A, The diagnostic feature of postinfectious glomerulonephritis (GN) is the presence of large, sparse, subepithelial electron dense deposits (humps). B, Postinfectious GN. C3 staining shows sparse granular staining in mesangium and capillary walls (starry sky).

Differential Diagnosis

For information on the differential diagnosis, see the section on MPGN and Table 7-6 .

POSTINFECTIOUS GLOMERULONEPHRITIS—FACT SHEET

  • Immune-complex deposition disease that occurs after exposure to infection, generally group A β-hemolytic streptococcus (types 1, 4, and 12)

Incidence

  • Not so frequent in developed countries, but still high incidence in underdeveloped countries

  • Higher incidence in overcrowded environment with poor hygiene (skin infections)

Gender, Race, and Age Distribution

  • Poststreptococcal GN is common in children 6 to 10 years of age

  • Other forms of PIGN are more common in adults of any age

Clinical Features

  • Nephritic syndrome after an upper respiratory tract infection, accompanied by high ASO titer and low serum complement levels (most commonly in children)

  • Nephritic syndrome and low serum complement levels in adult patients with bacterial infection

Prognosis and Treatment

  • 90% of the cases resolve in a few weeks

  • Adults have a less favorable prognosis: only 60% of the patients recover

ASO, Antistreptolysin O; GN, glomerulonephritis; PIGN, postinfectious glomerulonephritis.

POSTINFECTIOUS GLOMERULONEPHRITIS—PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Light Microscopy

  • Mesangial cell proliferation

  • Endocapillary proliferation, including endothelial cells and neutrophils with obliteration of the capillary lumina

  • Occasional double contours

  • Fuchsinophilic capillary wall deposits (gumdrops)

  • Occasional extracapillary proliferation (crescents)

Immunofluorescence

  • IgG and C3 with starry sky pattern

  • In late stages, C3 only

  • IgA and C3, especially in methicillin-resistant infections

Ultrastructural Features

  • Humps: large, infrequent subepithelial deposits

  • Small mesangial and subendothelial deposits

Differential Diagnosis

  • Proliferative IgA NP

  • Lupus nephritis class IV

  • IC and C3-mediated MPGN

  • Monoclonal IgG GN

GN, Glomerulonephritis; IgA, immunoglobulin A; IgG, immunoglobulin G; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NP, nephropathy.

Prognosis and Treatment

Prognosis in children is good, whereas the prognosis in adults is more variable.

Lupus Nephritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease. Lupus nephritis is the most common complication and includes a wide range of glomerular damage. According to the most recently proposed International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) classification for lupus nephritis, the six classes of glomerular disease that can be identified include morphologic patterns that vary from normal to mesangial proliferative disease, segmental or global endocapillary proliferation, membranous glomerulopathy, and advanced sclerosing lesions.

Epidemiology

Lupus is mainly a disease of the young female (female:male ratio, 13:1) and is more common in black and Asian women, although systemic lupus erythematosus complicated with nephritis is more frequent in men and male patients have a worse renal outcome.

Clinical Features

Patients present with a variety of clinical symptoms. In mesangial proliferative forms, hematuria is the classic presentation, whereas in forms with endocapillary proliferation, nephritic syndrome is more common, sometimes accompanied by severe proteinuria. Class V lupus nephritis (membranous) generally presents with nephrotic syndrome.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

Lupus nephritis may present with a variety of morphologic patterns, recapitulated in the ISN/RPS lupus nephritis classification:

  • Class I: Minimal mesangial lupus nephritis with normal glomeruli on light microscopy but evidence of deposits on IF or EM.

  • Class II: Mesangial proliferative lupus nephritis has mesangial expansion and purely mesangial proliferation on light microscopy, accompanied by mesangial deposits on IF and EM.

  • Class III: Focal lupus GN, with segmental or global endocapillary proliferation involving less than 50% of the glomeruli. Extracapillary proliferation can be present. Any sclerosing features that are present should be mentioned in the report and diagnosis (e.g., focal sclerosing lupus nephritis). The presence of chronic and active lesions at the same time should be indicated as A (active) and C (chronic).

  • Class IV: Diffuse lupus GN has light microscopy active lesions, including subendothelial deposits and endocapillary proliferation, segmental (S) or global (G), that involve 50% or more of the glomeruli. Class IV lupus nephritis can have diffuse subendothelial deposits (wire loops), sometimes with double contours, intraluminal immune aggregates (hyaline thrombi), endocapillary hypercellularity (occasionally resembling MPGN), or a combination of active lesions. Although some cases may have little proliferation if the glomerular disease is characterized by extensive deposition of immune complexes (e.g., within >50% of glomeruli) in the subendothelium, the cases are still considered part of lupus nephritis class IV. Any sclerosing features that are present should be mentioned in the report and diagnosis (e.g., sclerosing diffuse lupus nephritis). The presence of active (A) and chronic (C) lesions at the same time should be indicated ( Fig. 7-17 , A to D ).

    FIGURE 7-17, Lupus nephritis class IV. A, Lupus nephritis class IV. This trichrome stain shows large subendothelial deposits (red) forming wire loops (60×). B, Occasionally, endocapillary deposits can also be noted (hyaline thrombi). It is important to discriminate between hyaline thrombi formed by intracapillary precipitation of immune complexes and thrombi formed by fibrin. Extensive double contours and endocapillary proliferation are also present (silver, 60×). C, Large deposits can be seen also in vascular walls (hematoxylin and eosin, 40×). D, On immunofluorescence (IF), all immunoglobulins (Ig) and fractions of complement are generally positive. In this figure, IF staining for IgM shows semilinear staining in the capillary walls, corresponding to the large subendothelial deposits seen in A (wire loops). E, The large subendothelial and endocapillary deposits are also seen on electron microscopy. Again, double contours are present. F, Occasionally, deposits have an organized substructure in microtubules (fingerprints).

  • Class V: Membranous lupus nephritis has diffuse thickening of the glomerular basement membranes with subendothelial deposits (see membranous glomerulopathy ), sometimes with mesangial expansion and deposits. Membranous glomerulopathy pattern also may occur in combination with class III or IV lesions. Lesions can be active or chronic.

The semiquantitative scoring system for activity and chronicity indices has generated much controversy. Scoring indices often include separated activity index with active lesions including crescents, necrosis, large wire loops, endocapillary proliferation, exudation, and interstitial inflammation. For the chronicity index, the amount of glomerular sclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and chronic vascular damage is calculated.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

Deposits generally stain for all Ig and fractions of complement (C3, C4, and C1q are the most frequently tested). The pattern of positive staining varies accordingly to the class of lupus nephritis. In classes I and II, positive staining is restricted to the mesangium. Classes III and IV show semilinear staining in the capillary walls (wire loops) and mesangial staining ( Fig. 7-17 , E ). In class V, the staining is mostly granular in the capillary walls. Sclerosing lupus nephritis may have only traces to no staining at all.

Electron Microscopy

Electron dense deposits are present in the mesangial areas (classes I and II) or in the mesangium and subendothelium with occasional subepithelial deposits (classes III and IV). Class V shows numerous subepithelial deposits, with or without associated mesangial and subendothelial deposits. In sclerosing lupus nephritis, remodeling of the GBM and mesangial sclerosis may be the only findings. Deposits may be organized in a curvilinear parallel arranged pattern and resemble fingerprints ( Fig. 7-17 , F ). Podocyte injury with foot process effacement is a constant finding, especially in classes III, IV, and V. A typical finding in lupus nephritis is the presence of tubuloreticular inclusions in endothelial cells.

Differential Diagnosis

Lupus nephritis can mimic a variety of diseases. Class II can mimic IgA nephropathy; classes III and IV may mimic any form of proliferative glomerular disease, idiopathic or secondary. Class V is obviously very similar to idiopathic or other secondary forms of membranous glomerulopathy. Clinical information together with a positive IF for all Ig and complement fraction should guide the diagnosis. The presence of ultrastructural tubuloreticular inclusions and positive immunofluorescence staining for C1q are strongly suggestive of lupus nephritis.

Prognosis and Treatment

The prognosis varies according to the class. Class II lupus nephritis generally progresses very slowly, whereas classes III and IV have a more aggressive course. In approximately one fourth of the cases, transformation from one class to another can occur. Despite some controversy, lesions with high activity, including fibrinoid necrosis of glomeruli and vessels and crescents, need aggressive treatment. Lesions with high chronicity index also have a poor prognosis. Consolidated assessment of the biopsy activity or chronicity may provide better correlations with clinical and outcome parameters in the future.

Glomerulopathies with Organized Deposits

Ultrastructural fibrils or microtubules can be observed in a variety of diseases (see Table 7-6 ):

  • Amyloidosis

  • Fibrillary glomerulopathy

  • Immunotactoid glomerulopathy

  • Cryoglobulinemia

  • Lupus nephritis

  • Diabetic glomerulosclerosis

  • Fibronectin glomerulopathy

LUPUS NEPHRITIS—FACT SHEET

Definition

  • Autoimmune disease characterized by dysregulation and hyperactivity of B cells, with wide range of morphologic patterns

Incidence

  • Lupus nephritis is the most common complication of systemic lupus erythematosus

Gender, Race, and Age Distribution

  • Female predominance (female:male ratio, 13:1)

  • Adolescents and young adults

  • More common in blacks and Asians

Clinical Features

  • The clinical presentation varies according to the class of lupus nephritis

  • Hematuria, nephritic syndrome, nephrotic syndrome, or a combination of the two

  • Acute renal failure occurs in cases with severe active disease

Prognosis and Treatment

  • Active diseases need aggressive immunosuppression

  • High chronicity index is a poor prognostic feature

LUPUS NEPHRITIS—PATHOLOGIC FEATURES

Light Microscopy

  • Class I: normal histology

  • Class II: mesangial proliferation

  • Class III: focal proliferative GN (<50% of glomeruli)

  • Class IV: diffuse proliferative GN (>50% of glomeruli)

  • Class V: membranous pattern

  • Class IV: advanced sclerosing glomerulopathy

  • Activity index (0-24): endocapillary proliferation (0-3+), glomerular inflammation (0-3+), wire loops (0-3+), interstitial inflammation (0-3+), fibrinoid necrosis (0-3+ × 2), cellular crescents (0-3+ × 2)

  • Chronicity index (0-12): glomerular sclerosis (0-3+), fibrous crescents (0-3+), interstitial fibrosis (0-3+), and tubular atrophy (0-3+)

Immunofluorescence

  • All Ig and fractions of complement are positive (full house)

  • Class I and II: mesangial deposits

  • Class III and IV: mesangial and capillary wall deposits (wire loops)

  • Class V: granular deposits in the capillary walls

  • Class VI: sparse weak granular deposits or negative IF

Ultrastructural Features

  • Mesangial deposits are always present

  • According to the class of lupus nephritis, subepithelial and subendothelial deposits can be seen

    • In classes III and IV, the subendothelial deposits are prominent and the subepithelial rare

    • In class V, numerous granular electron dense deposits are present between the GBM and podocytes

Differential Diagnosis

  • Class II: IgA NP

  • Class III and IV: all forms of MPGN

  • Class V: all other forms of membranous glomerulopathy

  • Class VI: FSGS

FSGS, Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GN, glomerulonephritis; IF, immunofluorescence; Ig, immunoglobulin; IgA, immunoglobulin A; MPGN, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NP, nephropathy.

Fibrils do not have a lumen, do not have periodicity, are randomly arranged, and may be derived from amyloid proteins, immunoglobulins or extracellular matrix proteins (collagen).

Microtubules have a lumen, are generally oriented in parallel bundles, and are composed of immunoglobulins.

Amyloidosis

The two most common forms of amyloidosis occur in patients with a plasma cell dyscrasia or a longstanding history of chronic inflammation. Familial forms of amyloidosis are rare. Although in the past the diagnosis was made exclusively with histologic and ultrastructural examination, more recently the use of mass spectrometry has been shown to increase the ability to subcategorize these entities.

Epidemiology

Among the patients with primary amyloidosis, approximately 10% to 20% have myeloma, and the remaining ones have monoclonal spikes in urine or serum only. Patients with secondary amyloidosis have a history of chronic inflammatory disease such as osteomyelitis, rheumatoid arthritis, tuberculosis, or cancer. This form is the result of increased serum amyloid A (SAA) levels from protracted tissue destruction and inflammation and reduced capacity of liver enzymes to degrade it.

Clinical Features

The most common clinical presentation is nephrotic range proteinuria or NS with or without renal failure.

Pathologic Features

Microscopic Findings

Glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, and vessels may be involved by amyloidosis. Amyloid appears as a smudgy accumulation of acellular material that may involve mesangial areas or capillary walls. It is pale on H&E and PAS and is silver negative ( Fig. 7-18 , A ). Occasionally, projections of epimembranous spicules may be seen protruding from the capillary walls into the urinary space. Congo red is positive with classic birefringence; this is the most specific stain for amyloidosis ( Fig 7-18 , B ). Immunofluorescence for thioflavin T is a very sensitive technique. It is possible to discriminate between AL and AA with pretreatment of the sections with potassium permanganate before staining with Congo red. AA is Congo red negative, whereas AL maintains the classic birefringence. Immunostaining for κ, λ, AA, or other components in familial forms of amyloidosis confirms the diagnosis and further characterizes the disease ( Fig. 7-18 , C and D ).

FIGURE 7-18, Amyloidosis. A, Amorphous deposition of silver negative material in the mesangial areas (silver stain, 40×). B, Amyloid is Congo red positive and shows typical apple green birefringence under polarized light (40×). C, Secondary amyloidosis stains positive with antibodies against amyloid fibril protein (AA) in the glomeruli (40×). D, Secondary amyloidosis stains positive with antibodies against AA in the tubular basement membranes (40×). E, Amyloid fibrils are nonbranching and randomly organized. They are found in the mesangial areas and in the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). They measure approximately 9 to 11 nm. F, Primary amyloidosis (AL), λ type. On immunofluorescence, λ is positive in the glomerular mesangium and GBM. An interlobular artery also shows extensive deposition of amyloid positive for λ light chain only.

Ancillary Studies

Immunofluorescence

In AL amyloid, κ, or more frequently λ, is positive, whereas staining for AA is positive in secondary forms. Staining for AA amyloid can be performed with IF or with immunohistochemistry ( Fig. 7-18 , C and F ). IF can also be performed for amyloid transthyretin in suspected familial form of amyloidosis.

Electron Microscopy

A characteristic feature is the presence of subendothelial, mesangial, and subepithelial 8-nm to 11-nm fibrils, randomly arranged. They may form pseudospikes when they protrude throughout the basement membranes into the urinary space ( Fig. 7-18 , E ).

Differential Diagnosis

Any lesion with hypocellular expansion of the mesangium may be in the differential diagnosis with amyloidosis (see Table 7-6 ). Nodular sclerosis or hyalinosis can also resemble amyloidosis. Congo red positive staining is the first step toward the diagnosis of amyloidosis versus all the other diseases with organized deposits. Amyloid fibrils are randomly arranged and measure 9 to 11 nm versus 12 to 30 nm (generally around 20 nm) in fibrillary glomerulopathy; moreover, whereas AL amyloid contains only one of the light chains, fibrillary glomerulopathy is always positive for IgG and both light chains. In immunotactoid glomerulopathy, deposits are composed of bundles of microtubules (and not fibrils) with a parallel arrangement that measure 10 to 90 nm (generally >30 nm) and are composed of Ig (IgG), C3, or both or most frequently only one of the light chains. Cryoglobulinemia is characterized in most of the cases by curved microtubules that measure 25 to 35 nm. In diabetic glomerular sclerosis, collagen fibers (diabetic fibrillosis) are negative on IF and argyrophilic on silver staining and measure 5 to 20 nm.

Prognosis and Treatment

Prognosis is generally poor. End-stage renal disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in primary forms. Patients with primary amyloidosis have a worse prognosis compared with those with AA amyloidosis. AL forms are treated with chemotherapy.

Fibrillary Glomerulopathy

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here