Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Exodeviation may be controlled by a fusional mechanism and is classified as exophoria (X), intermittent exotropia (X(T)), or constant exotropia (XT) ( Fig. 80.1 ). X(T) is a disease that becomes manifest when fusional convergence of exophoria is intermittently lost. It differs from exophoria as manifest strabismus naturally occurs with decreased alertness or fatigue. Monocular eye closure may occur with exotropia. Near stereoacuity is mostly preserved, but stereopsis may deteriorate with progression.
The causes of X(T) are not fully understood. The following have been proposed:
An imbalance between active convergence and divergence, although it is not clear that divergence is active. Bielschowsky believed that exodeviation is governed by static (anatomic) and dynamic (innervational) factors. During the dynamic interplay between convergence and divergence, any imbalance favoring divergence may result in X(T).
Abnormal orbital anatomy. Exotropia often occurs in disorders associated with hypertelorism such as Apert and Crouzon syndrome. One study found that patients with X(T) have longer interorbital distances compared to patients with esotropia or no strabismus, but there is no evidence that the orbital axis of patients with X(T) is wider than normal.
Abnormalities of extraocular muscle proprioception, although the existence of active proprioceptors in extraocular muscles is disputed. Corsi et al. reported alterations in the ultrastructure of the myotendinous junctions in patients with congenital esotropia. Another study suggested intermittent exotropia might be caused by convergence problems of the medial rectus muscle arising from Schwann cell degeneration. Axonal profiles of the medial rectus muscles were shown to differ in patients with X(T) and acquired sensory exotropia.
X(T) is the most common form of divergent strabismus. Divergent strabismus is much more common than convergent strabismus in Asia. In Singaporean children aged between 6 and 72 months, the prevalence of strabismus was 0.8%, with an exotropia : esotropia ratio of 7 : 1; 63% of cases of exotropia were intermittent. By contrast, X(T) is rare in South African black and mixed-race children. A female predominance has been found in some studies. According to a study of 1514 non-Hispanic White children and 1522 Asian children aged 6 months to 5 years, the prevalence of strabismus was 3.55% for the Asian group; of these, 2.1% were exotropia and 1.38% were esotropia. In contrast, the prevalence of strabismus for the non-Hispanic White group was 3.24%; of these, 0.73% were exotropia and 2.31% were esotropia.
X(T) typically has its onset in the second to third year of life when an intermittent outward drift of one eye or monocular eye closure in bright sunlight is noted ( Fig. 80.2 ). However, Costenbader analyzed 472 patients with X(T) and found that 62% of them developed the condition before age 1 year. Hiles and Biglan coined the term “infantile exotropia” to describe children who had the onset of exotropia during the first year of life. However, others use the term X(T) when referring to children with an exotropia presenting during the first year of life. X(T) usually is more pronounced with fatigue, fever, or an upper respiratory infection. Older children or adults may complain of eye fatigue or headaches. It is very rare for young children to complain of these symptoms, presumably because of their well-developed suppression mechanism. Monocular eye closure in X(T) has been attributed to photophobia, although it is difficult to explain why more light should enter exotropic than orthotropic eyes. Monocular eye closure may be due to diplopia or abnormal visual perception, or a reduction in the threshold for bright light, induced by divergence of the eyes. While it is true that monocular eye closure is common with X(T), it also occurs in patients with a constant exotropia as well as people without strabismus. It may improve following exotropia surgery.
Burian reported that the distribution of refractive error in patients with exotropia is similar to the general population and the cause of exotropia is largely unrelated to refractive error. However, recent studies have reported that myopia and exotropia are significantly linked.
Comparison of the angle of distance and near deviations and a determination of the type of exotropia is important when planning exotropia surgery but some clinicians dispute whether these findings are helpful in predicting the surgical outcome.
X(T) is traditionally classified into four types ( Table 80.1 ):
Burian | Kushner |
---|---|
Divergence excess |
|
Simulated divergence excess (based on monocular occlusion) | TPF |
Simulated divergence excess (based on +3.00 D lenses) |
|
Basic | Basic |
Convergence insufficiency |
|
1. True divergence excess : the deviation is more than 10 prism diopters (PD) larger when measured at distance fixation than at near.
2. Simulated (pseudo) divergence excess : initially greater at distance fixation, but the misalignment at near fixation increases to within 10 diopters of the angle at distance following disruption of near binocular vision by monocular occlusion and/or +3.00 D lenses.
3. Basic : the size of the misalignment is within 10 PD, when the misalignment is measured at distance and near fixation.
4. Convergence insufficiency : the deviation is more than 10 PD larger when measured at near fixation than in the distance.
Duane first used, the terms “divergence excess” and “convergence insufficiency” to describe a difference between the distant and near angle of deviation. However, he did not provide a mechanism to account for the difference between the distant and near angles of deviation. It is reasonable to assume that differences in distant and near angles of deviation are affected by relative convergence excess in basic exodeviation (i.e. tonic fusional, accommodative or proximal convergence). With pseudodivergence excess type X(T) the distant angle of deviation is initially greater than the near angle of deviation, but after covering one eye for an extended period of time (30 minutes to 2 hours) they become similar. This is because fusional convergence to a manifest near deviation is blocked after one eye is covered for a long period of time. A high ratio of accommodative convergence to accommodation (AC/A) ratio can be diagnosed if +3.00 D lenses increase the near angle of deviation. Kushner reported that 60% of patients with true divergence excess have a high AC/A ratio, while the rest have normal or increased proximal convergence. However, the X(T) type is not fixed and can change. According to one study, after a part-time occlusion therapy of the dominant eye for 3 months, the basic and convergence-insufficiency types converted to pseudo-divergence excess and basic types in approximately one-half of the subjects. It has been hypothesized that patching may improve fusional ability or fusional convergence at near.
Exotropia has psychosocial effects in older children and adults. Burian reported that symptoms of exotropia include blurred vision, asthenopia, visual fatigue, and rarely diplopia in older children and adults. Patients may feel more exhausted, but reduced stereopsis generally does not adversely affect vision-related quality of life. One report described significant improvements in appearance-related symptoms regardless of age, especially in patients with constant exotropia.
Evaluating a patient’s control of their X(T) is mandatory to obtain a baseline assessment and to monitor deterioration and progression. It allows ophthalmologists to detect early signs of deterioration and to institute timely intervention. Over time, X(T) tends to become manifest more often as fusional vergence deteriorates. Distance fixation usually deteriorates first, with most patients preserving better control at near (because fusional, accommodative, and proximal convergence are easier at near). If untreated, many patients with X(T) eventually advance to constant exotropia in the distance and even at near. To preserve stereoacuity, timely surgical intervention is necessary.
Traditionally, most methods of assessing control in patients with X(T) have been subjective. They include observing control in the office and at home and then determining the frequency and duration of the deviation. These criteria consist of a parental report of the frequency with which a divergent misalignment is observed (home control) and an objective assessment following the induction of strabismus with a cover test (office control). Rosenbaum suggested that exotropia surgery should be considered for patients when strabismus is present for more than 50% of the time and the exotropiais poorly controlled during the examination. The relationship between these two criteria requires further study, but a correlation has been shown to exist between home and office control. The home control element is potentially subjected to observer bias, but does have the merit of being a parental reported outcome measure.
The other two scoring systems for the measuring the control of X(T) are the Mayo office-based scale, and the Newcastle Control Score. The Mayo scoring system is outlined in Box 80.1 . The Mayo scale is based solely on timed observations. An average of three scores is recommended to provide a reliable measure. The second scoring system is the Newcastle Control Score for Intermittent Exotropia (NCS). The criteria for the NCS are given in Table 80.2 . The NCS is based on the criteria for surgical intervention popularized by Rosenbaum. The control grade may be used to determine the timing of surgical intervention, but surgical success rate is related to other factors.
5 = Constant exotropia
4 = Exotropia >50% of the exam before dissociation
3 = Exotropia <50% of the exam before dissociation
2 = No exotropia unless dissociated, recovers in >5 seconds
1 = No exotropia unless dissociated, recovers in 1–5 seconds
0 = No exotropia unless dissociated, recovers in <1 second (phoria)
Notes: The score is measured at distance and near fixation, and so yields an overall control score ranging from 0 to 10.
Levels 5 to 3 are assessed during an initial 30-second period of observation at distance fixation and repeated at near fixation for another 30-second period.
Levels 2 to 0 are then graded as the worst of three rapidly successive trials; an occluder is placed over the right eye for 10 seconds and then removed, measuring the length of time it takes for fusion to be re-established. The left eye is then occluded for 10 seconds and the time to re-establish fusion is similarly measured. A third trial of 10-second occlusion is performed, covering the eye that required the longest time to re-fuse. The worst level of control observed following the three 10-second periods of occlusion should be recorded. If the patient has a microesotropia by simultaneous prism and cover test, but exodeviation by alternate cover test, the scale applies to the exodeviation.
NCS criteria | Score |
---|---|
Home control (XT or monocular eye closure seen) | |
|
|
Clinic control (scored for near and distance fixation) | |
|
|
Total score : n/9 |
The refractive error should be corrected before measuring the angle of deviation. Patients should fixate on the 20/50 ~ 20/30 line on the Snellen chart when measuring the angle of deviation in the distance, to help them relax their accommodation. If accommodation is not relaxed when measuring the angle of deviation in the distance, the measurement may be inaccurate due to residual accommodative convergence.
Variability in the angle of the deviation is an important characteristic of X(T). The degree of fusional convergence and the angle of deviation may vary during an examination because the degree of fusional convergence is affected by the general health, degree of alertness, and muscle tone of a patient. The occlusion test can help by blocking fusional convergence and thereby reducing the variability caused by fusional convergence.
Previous studies have reported that the occlusion test increases the angle of exodeviation measured in the distance and at near. The angle of exodeviation measured after monocular occlusion is often used to determine the maximum angle of deviation. This test is performed by applying a patch over one eye, for 30 minutes to an hour, or even as long as 24 hours, before remeasuring the angle of the deviation. A consensus has not been reached in terms of the optimal duration of occlusion. Both eyes should remain closed until the examiner has removed the patch and put a cover in front of one eye to prevent fusion prior to re-measuring ocular alignment. The occlusion test is also used to distinguish X(T) types (pseudo- vs true divergence excess type). A recent study showed that the maximal angle of deviation in patients with X(T) could be measured by the alternate prism cover test with polarized glasses. They suggested that it may be easier, simpler, and quicker to measure the maximum angle of exodeviation using polarized glasses because they induce fusional breaks under natural conditions.
In addition, measuring the angle of deviation at a distance greater than 6 meters has been proposed to measure the largest angle of deviation. Wright reported improved surgical results by using both the occlusion test and the angle of deviation test in the distance.
Monocular occlusion should be used before +3.00 D lenses to measure near deviation, to avoid misdiagnosing high AC/A ratio. These lenses suspend normal accommodative convergence to reduce accommodative load at near, whereas, monocular occlusion relaxes fusional convergence (see Table 80.1 ).
The angle of deviation in lateral gaze should also be considered. Parks reported that if the angle of deviation in left and right gaze is less than the angle of deviation in primary gaze, the lateral rectus muscles should be recessed a lesser amount. Moore reported an eight times higher frequency of overcorrection after exotropia surgery when patients have lateral incomitance. The definition of lateral incomitance varies. Repka and Arnoldi reported that measurement errors arise from how prisms are held while measuring the angle of deviation in lateral gaze. The rear of the prism (plastic prism) should be positioned perpendicular to the imaginary line connecting the object and the subject’s eye when looking laterally.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here