Infantile hemangiomas, vascular malformations, and other vascular disorders of infancy and childhood


Classification of vascular lesions

Vascular birthmarks, or congenital vascular anomalies, are common lesions that may present in a variety of fashions. There has traditionally been a significant amount of confusion regarding the nomenclature of these lesions, and the term hemangioma was widely used in the medical literature in reference to a variety of different vascular anomalies. , In 1982, Mulliken and Glowacki proposed a classification system for vascular anomalies based on clinical and cellular features. This classification was further refined 6 years later in a book, and in 1996 it was adopted as the official classification system for vascular anomalies by the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA). This nomenclature revolutionized the classification of vascular lesions and is the basis for continued study into the causes of these lesions and their therapy. The ISSVA classification was updated in 2014, reflecting the expanded spectrum of relevant disorders identified after publication of the initial classification.

According to the updated ISSVA classification system ( Box 12.1 ), vascular birthmarks are divided into the categories of tumors and malformations. Vascular tumors, which have been divided into benign , locally aggressive/borderline, and malignant forms, are neoplasms of the vasculature. The benign category includes infantile hemangioma (the most common vascular tumor), congenital hemangiomas, tufted angioma, and pyogenic granuloma (PG). Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and Kaposi sarcoma are examples of locally aggressive/borderline types, and angiosarcoma is the predominant malignant form.

Box 12.1
Modified from Wassef M, Blei F, Adams D, Alomari A, Baselga E, Berenstein A, et al. Pediatrics 2015;136(1):1–12.
Contemporary Classification of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA 2014 Classification)

Vascular tumors

Benign

  • Infantile hemangioma/hemangioma of infancy

  • Congenital hemangiomas (RICH, NICH, PICH)

  • Tufted angioma

  • Spindle cell hemangioma

  • Epithelioid hemangioma

  • Pyogenic granuloma

Locally aggressive or borderline

  • Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma

  • Retiform hemangioendothelioma

  • Papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma (Dabska tumor)

  • Composite hemangioendothelioma

  • Kaposi sarcoma

Malignant

  • Angiosarcoma

  • Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

Vascular Malformations

Simple

  • Capillary (CM) (e.g., port wine stain, telangiectasia, CMTC, salmon patch/nevus simplex)

  • Venous (VM) (includes common, familial, glomuvenous, others)

  • Lymphatic (LM) (includes macrocystic, microcystic, primary lymphedema, others)

  • Arteriovenous (AVM) and arteriovenous fistula (sporadic or syndromal)

CMTC , Cutis marmorata telangiectatica congenita; NICH, noninvoluting congenital hemangioma; PICH, partially involuting congenital hemangioma; RICH, rapidly involuting congenital hemangioma.

Combined

  • CM + VM, CM + LM, CM + AVM

  • LM + VM

  • CM + LM + VM

  • CM + LM + AVM, CM + VM + AVM

  • CM + LM + VM + AVM

Of major named vessels

  • Affect veins, arteries or lymphatics; usually of large caliber

Associated with other anomalies

  • Associated with anomalies of bone, soft tissue (usually overgrowth, rarely undergrowth) or viscera

Vascular malformations represent anomalous blood vessels without any endothelial proliferation or cellular turnover. In distinction to infantile hemangioma (IH), these lesions tend to be present immediately at birth and persist for a lifetime. Vascular malformations are further classified as simple, and then according to their predominant components (e.g., capillary malformation [CM], also known as port wine stain [PWS]; salmon patch), venous malformation (VM), lymphatic malformation (LM), and arteriovenous malformation (AVM)/arteriovenous fistula; combined (CM + VM, CM + LM, CM + LM + VM, etc.); of major named vessels ; and associated with other anomalies . Fig. 12.1 pictorially demonstrates the different natural histories of IHs and vascular malformations.

Fig. 12.1, Natural history of infantile hemangioma and vascular malformation.

This chapter includes discussion of vascular tumors and tumor syndromes, vascular malformations and malformation syndromes, disorders associated with vascular dilation, and a few miscellaneous disorders of the cutaneous vasculature.

Vascular tumors and tumor syndromes

Infantile hemangioma

IH, or hemangioma of infancy, is the most common benign soft-tissue tumor of childhood. Although estimates vary, it occurs in around 2% to 12% of infants. Female infants are three times more likely to have IHs than male infants, and the incidence is increased in premature neonates. Although they occur in all races, IHs appear to be less common in those of Black or Asian descent. Multiple gestation pregnancy, advanced maternal age, placenta previa, and preeclampsia also appear to be risk factors for IH. Although they are traditionally considered to be sporadic lesions, autosomal dominant segregation (with incomplete penetrance) or maternal transmission has been suggested. , Comparison of twin pairs with regard to IH has revealed no significant difference in concordance (both infants having IH) between monozygotic and dizygotic twins. These lesions vary considerably in their appearance and significance, related to their size, depth, location, growth pattern, and stage of evolution. Older descriptive terms for IH include strawberry, cavernous , and capillary hemangiomas. These terms are no longer useful and should not be used in the era of more specific vascular lesion nomenclature, as discussed earlier and shown in Box 12.1 . Although IHs may occur on any part of the body, they most commonly involve the head and neck regions. Facial hemangiomas have been noted to have a nonrandom distribution, with the majority of lesions occurring on the central face at sites of development fusion. Four primary segments of facial IH distribution have been identified, as shown in Table 12.1 .

Table 12.1
Distribution Patterns of Facial Infantile Hemangiomas
Modified from Haggstrom AN, Lammer EJ, Schneider RA, et al. Patterns of infantile hemangiomas: new clues to hemangioma pathogenesis and embryonic facial development. Pediatrics 2006;117(3):698–703.
Segment Number/Name Distribution Comment
1 Frontotemporal segment Lateral forehead
Anterior temporal scalp
Lateral frontal scalp
Upper eyelid
Potentially greater risk of associated brain anomalies when PHACES syndrome present
2 Maxillary segment Lateral cheek
Upper lip
Spares philtrum, preauricular area
3 Mandibular segment Preauricular area
Mandible
Chin
Lower lip
Potentially greater risk of cardiac defects when PHACES syndrome present
4 Frontonasal segment Medial frontal scalp/forehead
Nasal bridge
Nasal tip/ala
Philtrum
PHACES, Posterior fossa malformations, hemangioma, arterial anomalies, cardiac defects, eye anomalies, and sternal defects.

The pathogenesis of IH is not yet completely understood. Positive endothelial cell staining with erythrocyte-type glucose transporter (GLUT)–1 protein has been noted in lesions during all of the growth phases. It is absent in other vascular lesions such as vascular malformations and hemangioendotheliomas. This protein is normally expressed in the microvascular endothelia of blood–tissue barriers such as the brain, retina, placenta, and endoneurium. As such it has been suggested that IH may originate from invading angioblasts that have differentiated toward a placental cell type or from embolized placental cells, although some data refute a placental trophoblastic origin for these lesions. Further evidence of a potential relationship between human placenta and IH includes the high level of transcriptome similarity between these tissues and the higher incidence of pathologic placental findings observed from pregnancies resulting in a child with IH compared with those resulting in healthy infants without IH. Other endothelial cell markers shared between IH and placental tissue include Lewis Y antigen, FcγRII, and merosin. The Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene was found to also stain proliferative vascular tumors, including IH. , Aside from the placental embolization theory of pathogenesis, other hypothesized causes for IH development include a somatic mutation in a gene mediating endothelial cell proliferation and hypoxia-induced stress that triggers overexpression of angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) .

Hemangiomas may occur as superficial, deep, or mixed lesions representing their soft-tissue depth. The clinical appearance of the lesion depends on the type of hemangioma present. Superficial IHs, when well formed, present as bright red to scarlet, dome-shaped to plaque-like to lobulated papules, plaques, and nodules ( Figs. 12.2 through 12.6 ). They may partially blanch with pressure and are rubbery or noncompressible on palpation. Deep IHs usually present as subcutaneous, partially compressible nodules and tumors, often with an overlying blue hue, prominent venous network, or telangiectasias ( Figs. 12.7 through 12.9 ). These lesions may be warm to palpation. Combined IHs have both a superficial component and a deep component and occur in up to 25% to 30% of patients. They present with both the superficial, bright red component and a deeper, blue nodular component ( Figs. 12.10 and 12.11 ). Hemangiomas may also be divided into subtypes based on their anatomic configuration. Focal lesions are discrete, usually round lesions that appear to arise from a single focal point. Segmental lesions (see later) involve a more broad anatomic unit that may be determined by embryonic placodes. Indeterminate lesions are difficult to classify into one of the preceding two subtypes.

Fig. 12.2, Hemangioma, superficial: forehead.

Fig. 12.3, Hemangioma, superficial: trunk.

Fig. 12.4, Hemangioma, superficial. Note the patchy nature of this lesion, which eventually became confluent.

Fig. 12.5, Hemangioma, superficial: leg.

Fig. 12.6, Hemangioma, superficial. Note the early ulceration of the lateral inferior portion.

Fig. 12.7, Hemangioma, deep. Note the subtle blue hue and surface telangiectasias.

Fig. 12.8, Hemangioma, deep. This larger lesion shows the characteristic deep-blue hue and surface telangiectasia.

Fig. 12.9, Hemangioma, deep. This small, deep lesion resulted in mechanical ptosis, necessitating therapy out of concern for light-deprivation amblyopia. Note the overlying surface telangiectasias.

Fig. 12.10, Combined hemangioma. Note the larger, deep component and the bright red, superficial component of this combined lesion.

Fig. 12.11, Combined hemangioma. This lesion is predominantly deep, with studding of the surface with small, superficial components.

Hemangiomas may present with a variety of precursor lesions, and in up to 50% of affected infants these premonitory marks may be evident at birth. They include areas of telangiectasias ( Fig. 12.12 ), pallor ( Fig. 12.13 ), ecchymotic macules ( Fig. 12.14 ), and even ulceration ( Figs. 12.15 and 12.16 ). Fully formed IHs may occasionally present at birth and are termed congenital hemangiomas. These lesions are discussed in more detail later.

Fig. 12.12, Hemangioma precursor, telangiectasias. This lesion might initially be diagnosed as a port wine stain; within 4 weeks it was thickening, with eventual ulceration of the lip.

Fig. 12.13, Hemangioma precursor, pallor and telangiectasias. This 2-day-old boy presented with a vasoconstricted patch (pallor) with telangiectasias (A) . Follow-up evaluation at 2.5 weeks of age revealed changes consistent with proliferative infantile hemangioma (B) .

Fig. 12.14, Hemangioma precursor, ecchymosis. This bruise-like appearance may be seen before hemangioma proliferation occurs.

Fig. 12.15, Hemangioma precursor, ulceration. This 2-day-old newborn had this perianal ulceration; at 3 weeks of age, the ulceration was healing and the lesion had the classic appearance of a superficial hemangioma.

Fig. 12.16, Hemangioma precursor, ulceration. This perianal lesion presented at 1 week of age as a vascular plaque with ulceration.

The natural history of IH is characteristic. It is notable for a period of growth (the proliferative phase), a period of stability (the plateau phase), and a period of spontaneous regression (the involutional phase). The majority of IHs first become evident at 2 to 3 weeks of life, with potential continued growth until around 9 to 12 months of age. The majority of growth, however, occurs during the first 5 months of age (with 80% of growth completed by 3 months), and in those that continue to grow beyond this age, the growth rate is markedly slower. Occasionally, lesions have a proliferative phase that lasts for longer than 1 year, sometimes as long as 18 to 24 months. Deep IHs tend to exhibit both a delayed onset of growth and a sustained, longer growth phase. The onset of the involutional phase, which is difficult to predict in any given patient, is marked by a color change from bright red to dull red, purple, or gray (for superficial lesions) ( Figs. 12.17 and 12.18 ). It may be more difficult to appreciate early involution in deep IH, but with time these lesions become smaller/flatter, more compressible, and less warm. It was traditionally suggested that completed involution of IH occurs at a rate of 10% per year, such that 30% have involuted by 3 years of age; 50% by 5 years of age; 70% by 7 years of age, and more than 90% by 9 or 10 years of age. , , , It is now believed that the regression phase is completed in 90% of patients by 4 years (but maybe longer for deep IH). , , However, it should be remembered that involution does not necessarily imply totally normal skin. Possible residual changes after IH involution include telangiectasias ( Fig. 12.19 ), atrophy ( Fig. 12.20 ), scarring ( Fig. 12.21 ), and fibrofatty masses ( Figs. 12.22 and 12.23 ). These possibilities must be explained thoroughly to the parents of patients with IH.

Fig. 12.17, Hemangioma, involution phase. Note the patchy vascular appearance in this involuting lesion in a 2-year-old boy.

Fig. 12.18, Hemangioma, involution phase. The redness has largely resolved and the lesion flattened in this 3-year-old female.

Fig. 12.19, Hemangioma, involuted. This lesion demonstrates the residual telangiectasias that may persist after involution of the hemangioma.

Fig. 12.20, Hemangioma, involuted. This hemangioma was very large with complete obstruction of the visual axis and secondary ulceration. After involution, atrophy and scarring are both evident.

Fig. 12.21, Hemangioma, involuted. Residual scarring and atrophy are evident in this fully involuted lesion.

Fig. 12.22, Hemangioma, involuted. The cheek of this 4-year-old boy shows the residual fibrofatty tissue that may remain after involution.

Fig. 12.23, Hemangioma, involuted. This philtrum lesion has involuted, but fibrofatty residua remain.

Treatment decisions regarding an IH must incorporate many factors. These include the size and location of the lesion or lesions (see later), the age of the patient and growth phase of the hemangioma, associated findings, and the perceived potential for psychosocial distress both for parents and for the patient later in life. The latter is quite difficult to predict but must be seriously considered in the patient with a conspicuous IH, especially if it is facial. These lesions may be associated with parental disbelief, fear, mourning, and social stigmatization. Various instruments have been developed to help measure disease burden and quality of life (QoL) in patients and families with IH and have suggested that parents experience a high burden of disease and that certain clinical characteristics (such as location on the head and neck, being in the proliferative phase, and requiring treatment) correspond to a greater impact on QoL. ,

A hemangioma severity scale (HSS) has been developed and validated. HSS incorporates the factors described earlier, as well as risk for associated structural anomalies, complications, pain, and likelihood of disfigurement; testing of the HSS on large cohorts of infants with IH has suggested that a cutoff value of 10 to 11 or higher may be appropriate as a triage instrument for propranolol therapy and that a HSS score of 6 or greater merits referral to an IH specialist. The major goals of management should be to prevent or reverse life- or function-threatening complications; prevent disfigurement; minimize psychosocial stress; avoid overly aggressive procedures; and adequately prevent or treat ulceration to minimize infection, pain, and scarring. Treatment decisions can be challenging and must include parental input and a thorough risk-to-benefit analysis. Hemangiomas for which further evaluation, referral to a specialist, or therapy should be considered are listed in Box 12.2 . (These are discussed in more detail under Clinical Variants and Associated Syndromes.)

Box 12.2
Hemangiomas: Considerations for Evaluation, Referral, and/or Therapy

  • Life threatening

  • Function threatening

    • Periocular

    • Nasal tip

    • Ear (extensive)

    • Lips

    • Genitalia, perineum

    • Airway

    • Hepatic

  • Large facial

  • Large anogenital/perineal

  • “Beard” distribution *

  • Ulcerating

  • Lumbosacral

  • Multiple

*See text for discussion.

Treatment options for IH are listed in Table 12.2 , and clinical practice guidelines for the management of infantile hemangiomas have recently been published. Probably the most useful principle in the treatment of these lesions is that of active nonintervention. This term implies that the physician inquires about the parents’ knowledge of the condition, offers education regarding natural history and therapeutic indications, and offers anticipatory guidance and support. Active nonintervention is an appropriate “therapy” for the majority of IHs and can be offered by the pediatrician or primary care physician in most instances. Serial photography may be useful for parents of children with hemangiomas to document the gradual spontaneous involution, which may be subtle and underappreciated by them. Referral to support groups and informational resources, such as the Hemangioma Investigator Group ( www.hemangiomaeducation.org ), Vascular Birthmarks Foundation ( www.birthmark.org ), or the National Organization of Vascular Anomalies ( www.novanews.org ), is useful for parents of these children.

Table 12.2
Treatments for Infantile Hemangioma *
Treatment Comment
Active nonintervention Emotional support and guidance; distribution of patient education materials and referral to informational and support networks
Local wound care When ulcerated: topical antibiotic, nonstick wound dressings, compresses, becaplermin gel
Oral antibiotics When secondary infection present
Pain control When ulcerated: may require temporary use of narcotic analgesics
Oral β-blockers Usually propranolol 2–3 mg/kg per day; risks include bradycardia, hypotension (both usually asymptomatic), hypoglycemia, bronchospasm, hypothermia, nightmares
Topical β-blockers Most often timolol gel-forming ophthalmic solution, 0.1%–0.5%, applied two to three times daily; may be useful for smaller, localized and/or superficial IH
Topical corticosteroids Potent formulations; may be useful for localized, superficial IH
Intralesional corticosteroids Usually triamcinolone; localized bulky lesions; caution with periocular IH
Oral corticosteroids Traditional gold standard for systemic therapy; prednisone or prednisolone, 2–4 mg/kg per day; far less used in era of β-blocker therapy
Laser therapy Usually PDL; mainly useful for ulcerated IH or residual surface vascularity (e.g., telangiectasias) persisting after involution
Vincristine Severe, treatment-resistant or life-threatening IH; requires venous access; risks include myelosuppression, peripheral neuropathy, extravasation necrosis
Interferon-α Subcutaneous injection; severe, treatment-resistant, or life-threatening IH; risk of spastic diplegia
Surgical excision Useful in select situations, (e.g., incomplete resolution, disfiguring facial lesions, smaller complicated IH refractory to medical therapy)
IH, Infantile hemangioma; PDL, pulsed-dye laser.

* See text for more discussion.

The standard of care for IH requiring systemic therapy is oral propranolol. This nonselective β-blocker, which is traditionally used for cardiac indications such as hypertension or arrhythmia, was incidentally noted to result in marked shrinkage of IHs when administered in two children who had a cardiac indication and who also happened to have hemangiomas. Subsequently these effects were confirmed in several more patients reported by the same authors as well as in several other open-label series, prospective studies, and retrospective reviews. In the years after the initial report, propranolol evolved to become the therapy of choice for most clinicians with expertise in the treatment of IH. A multicenter, prospective, international, placebo-controlled study of oral propranolol for IH was subsequently completed and culminated in the approval of propranolol for treating IH by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as well as the European Medicines Agency. It is the first FDA-approved medication for this indication. The mechanism of action of propranolol in this setting is unclear, although most attribute the effects to some combination of vasoconstriction, inhibition of proangiogenic growth factors (including vascular endothelial growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and matrix metalloproteinase-9), regulation of the renin-angiotensin system, and induction of apoptosis. , It is most often started at around 1 mg/kg per day, with the dosage gradually titrated up to 2 to 3 mg/kg per day divided into two to three doses daily. The FDA approval of propranolol hydrochloride suggests a target dose of 3.4 mg/kg per day divided into two daily doses; however, many experts use lower target doses if efficacy is noted. Potential side effects include hypotension, bradycardia, bronchospasm, hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and nightmares/night terrors, and this agent should be administered under close supervision with attention to these possible toxicities. Propranolol has been used for IH in premature infants and has demonstrated both efficacy and safety. Rebound growth or recurrence of IH after propranolol therapy has been increasingly recognized and may occur in 6% to 25% of patients; this risk seems greatest in those who discontinue therapy before 9 months of age and in those with IH on the head and neck and of the segmental, deep, or mixed types. The time between discontinuation of therapy and appreciation of rebound is typically 3 to 6 months, and most lesions respond well to a second course of propranolol. Although propranolol therapy tends to be most effective during the early proliferative phase of IH (e.g., first 6 months), lesions in the postproliferative phase may also respond to treatment.

Hypoglycemia has surfaced as one of the most relevant (and preventable) potential toxicities of oral propranolol therapy, and the highest risk period for this effect is in the morning after the overnight fast that occurs during sleep. The mechanism for the development of hypoglycemia is likely related to β-blocker–mediated inhibition of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, mandatory components of physiologic glucose homeostasis. Measures to decrease this risk include always giving propranolol with food, holding therapy during periods of illness or decreased oral intake, and the avoidance of fasting for longer than 8 hours (which may require nighttime awakenings for feeding). , Parents should be taught to recognize early warning signs of hypoglycemia, including shakiness, sweating, anxious appearance, and coldness. Table 12.3 list some guidelines for the use of propranolol in the treatment of IH. A systematic review of propranolol safety in the treatment of IH found the therapy to be well tolerated overall, with most adverse events considered nonserious, transient, and manageable. Concerns about potential detrimental effects on learning, memory, and motor development related to propranolol therapy for IH in young infants have been suggested by some authors. , Although still controversial, several studies have been reassuring, finding no increased cognitive or other developmental risks, growth impairment or psychological problems in children as far out as 7 years from treatment with propranolol for IH.

Table 12.3
Guidelines for Use of Propranolol in the Treatment of Infantile Hemangioma
Modified from Drolet BA, Frommelt PC, Chamlin SL, et al. Initiation and use of propranolol for infantile hemangioma: report of a consensus conference. Pediatrics 2013;131:128–40; and Martin K, Blei F, Chamlin SL, et al. Propranolol treatment of infantile hemangiomas: anticipatory guidance for parents and caretakers. Pediatr Dermatol 2013;30(1):155–9.
Guideline Comment
Consider contraindications Cardiogenic shock, sinus bradycardia, hypotension, heart block (>1st degree), heart failure, bronchial asthma, hypersensitivity to propranolol
Perform ECG for patients at risk At-risk category includes HR less than normal for age, family history of congenital heart conditions or arrhythmias, maternal history of connective tissue disease, personal history of arrhythmia or one noted during examinationRoutine ECGs for all patients not indicated
Patients with PHACES syndrome: thorough imaging evaluation of head, neck, and cardiac arterial anatomy should be performed before initiation of therapy If imaging findings place patient into higher risk for stroke, consult/co-manage with neurologist during therapy; use lowest effective dose possible
Inpatient initiation of therapy recommended for infants younger than 5 weeks gestationally corrected age, * with comorbid conditions, or with poor social support Outpatient initiation of therapy appropriate for infants 5 weeks or older gestationally corrected age, * with adequate social support, and lack of comorbid conditions *
Typical dosing is 1 mg/kg per day (initiation) and 2–3 mg/kg per day (maintenance), divided two to three times daily BP and HR checks recommended at baseline, 1 and 2 hours after initial dose, and repeated with each dose increase of >0.5 mg/kg per day (until maintenance dose reached); dose may be increased every 3–7 days until goal dosage is reached
Always dose propranolol with food and avoid prolonged fasting Discontinue during illness or periods of decreased oral intake; awaken baby to feed at night as needed to prevent sleeping longer than 8 hours without eating (if evening dose given)
Hold propranolol during illness that includes wheezing β-blockers may exacerbate bronchospasm
BP, Blood pressure; ECG, electrocardiography; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; HR, heart rate; PHACES, posterior fossa malformations, hemangioma, arterial anomalies, cardiac defects, eye anomalies, and sternal defects.

* Based on FDA recommendation for propranolol hydrochloride outpatient initiation: 5 weeks and older corrected age and weight ≥2 kg HemangeolTM [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Pierre Fabre, 2014. Other recommendations for outpatient initiation vary by source: 8 weeks and older corrected age Drolet BA, Frommelt PC, Chamlin SL, et al. Initiation and use of propranolol for infantile hemangioma: report of a consensus conference. Pediatrics 2013;131:128–40; HemangeolTM [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Pierre Fabre, 2014; 5 weeks and older corrected age Torres EB, Wittel JB, Arbolave DLE, Bosch MIF, Sanz AC, Laguna RL, et al. Spanish consensus on infantile haemangioma. An Pediatr (Barc) 2016;85(5):256–65; 4 weeks and older corrected age Smithson SL, Rademaker M, Adams S, Bade S, Bekhor P, Davidson S, et al. Consensus statement for the treatment of infantile haemangiomas with propranolol. Aust J Dermatol 2017;58:155–9.

FDA recommendation for propranolol hydrochloride dosing: initiation dose of 0.6 mg/kg twice daily; increase over 2 weeks to 1.7 mg/kg twice daily Hemangeol TM [package insert]. Parsippany, NJ: Pierre Fabre, 2014.

Other β-blockers have also been studied as treatment for IH and may have a lower adverse event risk profile given they do not cross the blood–brain barrier. These include nadolol, a nonselective β-blocker, and atenolol, a selective β1 antagonist. Nadolol was demonstrated to be efficacious in a comparative trial against propranolol and has the potential advantages of decreased central nervous system (CNS) side effects such as nightmares. , Atenolol, which also entails a lower risk of CNS-related concerns, has shown efficacy in the treatment of IH and, given its β-receptor selectivity, may be associated with less risk of bronchospasm; it was found to be at least as effective as oral propranolol in a retrospective noninferiority trial.

After the discovery of propranolol’s efficacy in treating IH, several investigators reported the use of a topical nonselective β-blocker timolol for small, uncomplicated superficial hemangiomas. Topical timolol maleate gel-forming ophthalmic solution is classically used for the treatment of glaucoma, but reports have described its efficacy in subsets of patients with these smaller IHs. Most often used in concentrations of 0.1%, 0.25%, or 0.5%, it is typically applied two to three times daily to the surface of the IH and rubbed in well. Most small, superficial IHs and even some combined (superficial and deep) lesions respond to the treatment, which in general is very well tolerated. Systemic β-blocker side effects have been noted to occur only rarely, although adequate parent education about these potential toxicities (see previous discussion of propranolol) is warranted. In a multicenter retrospective cohort study of more than 700 timolol-treated IH patients, this therapy was well tolerated and moderately effective, with only mild adverse events and the greatest response demonstrated in thin, superficial lesions. In another retrospective series of timolol treatment in young and preterm infants, bradycardia occurred in 4 of 22 treated babies but was symptomatic in only 2; these 2 infants were preterm, young, had a history of bradycardia, and had received timolol at doses above the median exposure for the cohort. In summary, topical timolol ophthalmic solution is a reasonable consideration for small, primarily superficial, uncomplicated, and functionally insignificant IH.

Corticosteroids are the traditional mainstay of therapy for IHs requiring treatment. They are most often used in the oral form, although both intralesional and topical preparations may be useful. Intralesional corticosteroids may be useful for localized bulky lesions, especially in patients with contraindications to β-blocker therapy. Several injections may be necessary, and periocular lesions should be treated only by a physician experienced in their administration, given the possibility of embolization of corticosteroid particles and permanent vision loss. , Topical corticosteroid therapy with clobetasol (a potent, class 1 topical steroid) may be useful for localized IH. , In the authors’ experience, this therapy is most useful for macular or very thin plaque hemangiomas in the early proliferative stage, and its use has now been largely supplanted by topical timolol (see discussion earlier). If this medication is used, it should be used cautiously with attention to the risks of atrophy, ocular toxicity, and adrenal suppression.

Oral corticosteroids were at one time considered the gold standard for treatment of complicated IHs; their mechanism of action is poorly understood, and their use has now been largely supplanted by oral propranolol. , , They are most useful during the proliferative phase and are generally administered in dosages ranging from 2 to 4 mg/kg per day of prednisolone or prednisone. Some authors advocate doses up to 5 mg/kg per day. , This therapy is usually continued for several months, with gradual tapering as tolerated. If corticosteroids are tapered too quickly, rebound growth and adrenal suppression may occur. The goals of decreased IH growth or partial shrinkage must be balanced by the risks of long-term therapy. Common side effects include irritability, weight gain, hypertension, and gastrointestinal (GI) upset. Because the immune response is suppressed in patients receiving systemic corticosteroids, live-virus vaccinations should not be given during (or within 1 month after discontinuation of) therapy. Although decreased linear growth velocity may occur in treated patients, catch-up growth usually occurs after their discontinuation. , , Adrenal axis suppression is rare and, when it occurs, tends to be reversible. , Many experts treat concomitantly with H2 blockers (e.g., ranitidine or famotidine) to diminish the potential for symptomatic steroid-associated gastritis or worsening of gastroesophageal reflux. Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia has been rarely reported, which has prompted some experts to recommend trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis during systemic steroid therapy. , In the recent era of β-blocker therapy for IH, oral corticosteroids are used significantly less often, and primarily when there are contraindications or a history of poor response to oral propranolol. In a randomized head-to-head trial comparing propranolol and prednisolone for symptomatic proliferating IH, efficacy was similar between the two agents, but propranolol was better tolerated with fewer severe adverse events.

Interferon-α-2a or -2b, a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis, has been used successfully in patients with IH refractory to corticosteroid therapy. This medication is administered as a daily subcutaneous injection, in a dose of 1 to 3 million units/m 2 . Common side effects include fever, irritability, and malaise. Neutropenia, anemia, and elevation of hepatic transaminases may also occur. However, the most concerning toxicity of this therapy is neurologic in origin, most notably spastic diplegia, which may occur in up to 20% of treated patients. , Because of this risk, interferon therapy should be reserved for patients with severe life- or function-threatening lesions that are recalcitrant to other therapies, and neurologic evaluation before and during therapy should be performed. The chemotherapeutic agent vincristine is also occasionally used for steroid-resistant, life-threatening IHs. Surgical excision of IH is rarely recommended but may be a reasonable consideration for a “resectable” IH that is refractory to medical therapy and in a favorable location or if the scar will be the same whether the IH is removed early or after involution.

Ulcerated IH deserves special mention because this is the most common complication in these lesions, occurring in up to 16% of patients. , Ulceration usually occurs during the proliferative phase ( Fig. 12.24 ) and is especially common in areas of recurrent trauma such as the lips ( Fig. 12.25 ), genitals, and perineum/perianal region ( Fig. 12.26 ) or in moist intertriginous sites such as the neck ( Fig. 12.27 ). Tissue breakdown results in bleeding, secondary infection, pain, and permanent scarring. Local wound care with compresses, topical antibiotics (e.g., bacitracin, mupirocin, or metronidazole), and nonstick wound dressings (e.g., petrolatum-impregnated gauze or others) are useful. Oral antibiotics should be considered if persistent or deep ulceration, drainage, or exudate is present and should be guided by the results of culture and sensitivity testing. Pain management with acetaminophen or narcotic analgesics (e.g., hydrocodone with acetaminophen) may be necessary. Topical lidocaine may be helpful for pain control but should be used with extreme caution given the risks of absorption and possible systemic toxicity. Becaplermin gel, a recombinant human platelet–derived growth factor approved for topical therapy of lower extremity diabetic neuropathic ulcers in patients 16 years of age and older, has been used off-label for the treatment of ulcerated IH with good success. , Ulcerated IHs that do not improve with these treatments usually warrant systemic and/or laser therapy.

Fig. 12.24, Hemangioma, ulcerated. This arm lesion, which was in the proliferative phase, reveals superficial ulceration with crusting.

Fig. 12.25, Hemangioma, ulcerated. This lower-lip lesion ulcerated with permanent scarring the result.

Fig. 12.26, Hemangioma, ulcerated. This anogenital hemangioma developed multiple discrete ulcerations which were painful, requiring both topical and systemic therapy in addition to pulsed dye laser treatments.

Fig. 12.27, Hemangioma, ulcerated. This anterior neck hemangioma ulcerated and healed with marked cribriform scarring.

Pulsed-dye laser (PDL; the word laser is an acronym for light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation ) therapy may be useful in the treatment of ulcerated IH. This laser emits a wavelength of light specific for oxyhemoglobin, thus imparting specificity for vascular structures (selective photothermolysis). Because the light penetrates only 1 mm of depth in the skin, this modality is generally not helpful for nonulcerated, elevated, or nodular lesions. With ulcerated lesions, though, it is useful in accentuating reepithelialization and decreasing pain. , , The choice of PDL therapy must be individualized to the patient, and occasionally patients may show no response or even worsening with this modality. PDL therapy may also be useful for residual surface vascularity after IH involution. Although PDL is the most commonly used form of laser therapy for IH, other lasers such as the neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser or the alexandrite laser may offer some benefit but carry a higher risk of scarring.

Clinical variants and associated syndromes

Hemangiomas in certain locations may suggest a higher probability of complications or associated findings. Hemangiomas involving various portions of the face may be quite problematic. Periorbital IHs may be relatively insignificant when small, but larger lesions ( Fig. 12.28 ) may result in a variety of ocular complications. In addition, any periorbital IH may be indicative of deeper, retrobulbar involvement, which may or may not present with unilateral proptosis. Light-deprivation amblyopia may result from visual axis obstruction, most commonly in the setting of significant upper eyelid lesions that result in mechanical ptosis ( Fig. 12.29 ). Astigmatism may occur if the IH compresses the globe and may result in permanent amblyopia. In a retrospective study of 96 patients with periocular IH, lesions larger than 1 cm, with a deep component, and with involvement of the upper eyelid were significantly associated with astigmatism and amblyopia. Rarely, IH situated near a tear duct may block the drainage system and result in matting and conjunctivitis. Because of these concerns, any child with a periorbital IH should undergo ophthalmologic examination. If there are functional or anatomic ophthalmologic concerns, systemic therapy is usually indicated.

Fig. 12.28, Hemangioma, periocular. This large hemangioma was obstructing the visual axis secondary to its size and location.

Fig. 12.29, Hemangioma, periocular. Superior eyelid hemangiomas may result in ptosis, with a risk for light-deprivation amblyopia.

Nasal tip/bridge IHs ( Fig. 12.30 ) often require specialist consultation because of their propensity to distort the nasal anatomy ( Fig. 12.31 ), resulting in permanent disfigurement. Slow involution of these lesions may pose significant psychosocial distress to the older child, and the splaying of nasal cartilage combined with redundant fibrofatty tissue after involution may result in the “Cyrano” nasal deformity ( Fig. 12.32 ). The nasal crease sign is a linear, gray atrophic crease in the inferior columella that may occur with segmental facial IH involving the nose ( Fig. 12.33 ) and that may portend imminent cartilage destruction and nasal collapse. It is for these reasons that therapy is often indicated for nasal IH.

Fig. 12.30, Hemangioma, nasal bridge. This large lesion of the nasal bridge (A) results in significant bulbous distortion of the nose (B) and is likely to leave residual deformity.

Fig. 12.31, Hemangioma, nose. This large nasal lesion resulted in destruction of nasal cartilage and erosion of the columella in this extremely premature infant girl.

Fig. 12.32, Hemangioma, nasal tip. Large nasal tip lesions like this one may leave significant fibrofatty residua, resulting in a “Cyrano” deformity.

Fig. 12.33, Hemangioma, nasal crease sign. This infant girl had a segmental facial hemangioma involving the left forehead, periorbital region, glabella, nasal bridge, and nose. At 11 days after noting this linear gray atrophic crease (A) she returned to clinic with complete destruction of the nasal septum and columella and nasal collapse (B) .

Hemangiomas located on the lips tend to involute slowly and are more at risk for ulceration and bleeding. These changes may in turn contribute to increased pain, feeding difficulties, and permanent scarring. Ear IHs may also be cosmetically disfiguring ( Fig. 12.34 ) and, when large, may obstruct the auditory canal and result in conductive hearing loss.

Fig. 12.34, Hemangioma, ear. This large hemangioma encompassed much of the ear as well as part of the adjacent neck. Ear hemangiomas this significant may result in permanent ear deformity and, occasionally, conductive hearing loss.

Hemangiomas that involve the neck, lower lip, chin, preauricular, and mandibular areas (beard lesions) ( Fig. 12.35 ) are clinically important because of the increased risk of associated airway lesions in these patients. In one study, patients with more extensive IHs in this location had up to a 63% incidence of subglottic or upper-airway hemangiomatosis. In another series, beard IH presenting as telangiectatic lesions and those involving more medial regions (lower lip, chin, anterior neck, and sternum) appeared more likely to be associated with subglottic IH. Airway IH may also occur in the absence of cutaneous IH. Infants with symptoms are usually brought for treatment within the first few months of life with croup-like cough, hoarseness, and biphasic stridor. Any infant with extensive IH in this distribution or symptoms of upper-airway obstruction should be immediately referred for direct visualization of the airway with laryngoscopy. Treatment options in this setting may include propranolol, corticosteroids, laser therapy, surgical excision, and, occasionally, tracheotomy.

Fig. 12.35, Hemangioma, beard distribution. Lesions involving the lower lip, chin, neck, or mandibular regions have a greater risk of airway involvement, as was seen in this female infant.

Parotid IHs often present as mixed superficial and deep lesions with a prominent deep component of swelling with an overlying blue hue ( Fig. 12.36 ). These lesions tend to grow significantly and may involute more slowly than IHs in other locations. They may have a poorer response to pharmacologic therapy, although propranolol has been demonstrated to be effective in many patients. Genital ( Fig. 12.37 ) and perineal IHs are problematic because of ulceration, with the concomitant risks of bleeding, infection, permanent scarring, and pain. When these lesions are larger or segmental, the possibility of associated developmental anomalies of the external genitalia, anorectal region, genitourinary tract, spine, and spinal cord must be considered (see PELVIS syndrome). Hepatic IHs may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality and are discussed further in the Diffuse Neonatal Hemangiomatosis section.

Fig. 12.36, Hemangioma, parotid. This large subcutaneous tumor with a blue hue and surface telangiectasias was characteristic for a parotid infantile hemangioma. These lesions tend to grow significantly and regress more slowly, and often require systemic therapy.

Fig. 12.37, Hemangioma, genital. This labial lesion is at increased risk for surface breakdown given its location.

Lumbosacral IHs ( Fig. 12.38 ) are important because they may signal underlying occult spinal dysraphism or spinal cord defects. Tethering of the spinal cord is one of the more common associations, and this anomaly may result in permanent neurologic sequelae without release. Other common findings include spinal lipoma, intraspinal hemangioma, and sinus tracts. In a prospective study of 41 patients with lumbosacral IHs who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination, intraspinal abnormalities were detected in 21 patients, with a positive predictive value of IH for spinal dysraphism of 51.2%. An increased risk for spinal anomalies correlated with IH ulceration and the presence of additional cutaneous anomalies (including gluteal cleft asymmetry or deviation, sacral dimple, skin appendage, lipoma, dermal melanocytosis, dermal sinus, and aplasia cutis). Importantly, 35% of patients with an isolated lumbosacral IH had spinal dysraphism and 42% of children with normal ultrasound scans who then underwent MRI evaluation had spinal anomalies, highlighting the potential risk of relying on ultrasonography as a screening tool for high-risk infants. In addition to spinal anomalies, sacral IH may also be associated with various congenital anorectal or urogenital anomalies, as discussed with genital and perineal lesions. This association is discussed in more detail later (see PELVIS syndrome). Any infant with a lumbosacral IH, especially when it is large or of the segmental type or when other cutaneous stigmata are present, should be considered for MRI to assess for underlying abnormalities.

Fig. 12.38, Hemangioma, lumbosacral. This large segmental lesion would have an increased risk of association with underlying spinal dysraphism or spinal cord defects. Magnetic resonance imaging in this child was normal.

Segmental hemangiomas are lesions that involve a broad anatomic region ( Fig. 12.39 ; see Fig. 12.38 ) or a recognized developmental unit. They are often unilateral and sharply demarcated at the midline, although exceptions occur. Segmental IHs are most commonly located on the face. They seem to have a higher rate of complications and entail a greater risk for functional compromise and associated abnormalities such as urogenital anomalies or p osterior fossa malformations, h emangioma, a rterial anomalies, c ardiac defects, e ye anomalies, and s ternal defects (PHACES) syndrome (see the following paragraph). In addition, they are more often complicated by ulceration. The association of segmental IH with GI (typically lower GI) bleeding has been highlighted and appears to occur most often in the setting of PHACES syndrome with aortic dysplasia.

Fig. 12.39, Hemangioma, segmental. This superficial hemangioma occupied a large surface area of the distal arm and proximal forearm.

PHACES syndrome or PHACES association (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, 606519) is a constellation of clinical findings associated with extensive facial IH. Table 12.4 outlines the consensus-derived diagnostic criteria and various features seen in this syndrome. The majority of patients with PHACES syndrome are female. , Although the pathogenesis of this syndrome is unclear, it appears to be a developmental “field defect” that arises around the seventh to tenth week of gestation. In a large cohort of patients with the syndrome, greater reported rates of preeclampsia and placenta previa than expected in the general population were noted; these are also known risk factors for IH in general, and hence their significance as risk factors for PHACES syndrome is unclear.

Table 12.4
PHACES Syndrome: Consensus-Derived Diagnostic Criteria
Modified from Metry D, Heyer G, Hess C, et al. Consensus statement on diagnostic criteria for PHACE syndrome. Pediatrics 2009;124(5):1447–56; and Garzon MC, Epstein LG, Heyer GL, Frommelt PC, Orbach DB, Baylis AL, et al. PHACE syndrome: Consensus-derived diagnosis and care recommendations. J Pediatr 2016;178:24–33.
Manifestation (Organ/Location) Major Criteria Minor Criteria
P osterior fossa malformations (brain) Dandy–Walker complex
Other hypoplasia/dysplasia of mid/hind brain
Midline brain anomalies
Malformation of cortical development
H emangioma (skin) * N/A N/A
A rterial anomalies (cerebrovascular) Anomaly of major cerebral or cervical arteries
Dysplasia of large cerebral arteries (kinking, looping, tortuosity or dolichoectasia)
Arterial stenosis or occlusion
Absence/moderate to severe hypoplasia, or aberrant origin/course of large cerebral/cervical arteries
Persistent carotid-vertebrobasilar anastomosis
Aneurysm of any cerebral arteries
C ardiac anomalies/ c oarctation of the aorta (cardiovascular) Aortic arch anomalies

  • Aortic coarctation

  • Dysplasia (kinking, looping, tortuosity, dolichoectasia)

  • Aneurysm

  • Aberrant origin of subclavian artery with or without vascular ring

Ventricular septal defect
Right or double aortic arch
Systemic venous anomalies
E ye abnormalities (ocular) Posterior segment anomalies

  • Persistent hyperplastic primary vitreous

  • Persistent fetal vasculature

  • Retinal vascular anomalies

  • Morning glory disc anomaly

  • Optic nerve hypoplasia

  • Peripapillary staphyloma

Anterior segment anomalies

  • Microphthalmia

  • Sclerocornea

  • Coloboma

  • Cataract

S ternal clefting/ s upraumbilical abdominal raphe (ventral/midline) Anomaly of midline chest/abdomen

  • Sternal defect

  • Sternal pit

  • Sternal cleft

  • Supraumbilical raphe

Hypopituitarism
Ectopic thyroid
Midline sternal papule/hamartoma

N/A, not applicable.
DEFINITE PHACES syndrome:
Hemangioma >5 cm diameter of head/scalp PLUS 1 major criterion OR 2 minor criteria, OR
Hemangioma of neck, upper trunk or trunk & proximal upper extremity PLUS 2 major criteria.
POSSIBLE PHACES syndrome:
Hemangioma >5 cm diameter of head/scalp PLUS 1 minor criterion, OR
Hemangioma of the neck, upper trunk or trunk & proximal upper extremity PLUS 1 major OR 2 minor criteria, OR
No hemangioma PLUS 2 major criteria.

* Often extensive facial/plaque-like/segmental; occasional airway or other organ involvement.

Internal carotid, middle cerebral, anterior cerebral, posterior cerebral aa. or vertebrobasilar aa.

With or without moyamoya collaterals.

The facial IHs in patients with PHACES syndrome are usually large and segmental ( Fig. 12.40 ) and may be unilateral or bilateral. They usually follow an aggressive growth pattern, and ulceration is common ( Fig. 12.41 ). There may be a dermatomal distribution, although these dynamic lesions should not be confused with the static vascular malformations (PWSs) associated with Sturge–Weber syndrome (see later). When there is “beard” area involvement, airway hemangiomatosis should be considered. Hemangiomas may also occur in other nonfacial locations in the setting of PHACES syndrome, most notably the upper torso and extremities. Patients with large facial IHs (as well as those involving the scalp, neck, upper trunk, and proximal upper extremity), especially in the presence of ventral developmental defects such as sternal clefting or abdominal raphe ( Fig. 12.42 ), should be screened for this syndrome with MRI or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the brain and neck, echocardiography, ophthalmologic examination, and close neurologic and head circumference examinations. Direct airway visualization should be considered if the infant has extensive involvement in the beard area or symptoms of upper airway obstruction. In one prospective study, 31% of infants with a large facial IH measuring at least 22 cm 2 met diagnostic criteria for PHACES syndrome.

Fig. 12.40, Hemangioma, facial. Giant lesions like this one may be associated with the PHACES (posterior fossa malformations, hemangioma, arterial anomalies, cardiac defects, eye anomalies, and sternal defects) syndrome.

Fig. 12.41, Hemangioma with PHACES (posterior fossa malformations, hemangioma, arterial anomalies, cardiac defects, eye anomalies, and sternal defects) syndrome. This female infant presented with this large right-sided segmental facial hemangioma (A) , which developed ulceration of the right upper lip and nasal tip/columella (B) . She was found to also have intracranial arterial anomalies.

Fig. 12.42, PHACES syndrome with ventral developmental defects. (A) Sternal pit in a female infant with telangiectatic facial hemangiomas and multiple intracranial vascular anomalies. (B) Sternal pit/cleft and supraumbilical abdominal raphe in a 4-year-old female with partially involuted hemangiomas (note telangiectatic patch on upper midchest) and hypoplastic and tortuous cerebrovasculature.

Anomalies of the cervical and cerebral vasculature are commonly noted in PHACES syndrome, and these patients appear to have a progressive arterial vasculopathy with risk of arterial ischemic stroke (AIS). Regressive changes in the vascular anomalies have also been noted in some patients. Common CNS structural abnormalities include Dandy–Walker malformation, cerebellar hemisphere hypoplasia (ipsilateral to the hemangioma), and arachnoid cysts. , Aortic arch anomalies, especially aortic coarctation, are the most commonly noted cardiac abnormalities in PHACES syndrome and tend to be complex and anatomically atypical. These anomalies may remain asymptomatic in the first days of life until the ductus arteriosus closes, at which time they may result in severe hemodynamic consequences. Box 12.3 lists the recommended evaluation for the infant deemed to be at risk for PHACES syndrome. Diagnostic criteria for PHACES syndrome have been published. The greatest risk for morbidity in PHACES syndrome appears to be related to anomalies of the aorta and medium-sized arteries of the head, neck, and chest. Other findings in patients with this syndrome include headaches (may be severe), hearing loss, speech-language delay, dysphagia/feeding difficulties, dental enamel hypoplasia, and a variety of endocrinologic defects, including thyroid dysfunction, hypopituitarism with growth hormone deficiency, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and adrenal insufficiency.

Box 12.3
MRA, Magnetic resonance angiography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PHACES , posterior fossa malformations, hemangioma, arterial anomalies, cardiac defects, eye anomalies, and sternal defects.
Recommended Evaluation of the Infant at Risk for PHACES Syndrome

Baseline

  • Thorough physical examination, including the following:

    • Cutaneous (including assessment for ventral developmental defects)

    • Cardiac (including pressure measurements in all four extremities)

    • Respiratory (e.g., for stridor, hoarseness of cry, tachypnea)

    • Neurologic (e.g., for hypotonia, developmental delay)

    • Abdominal (e.g., for hepatomegaly, abdominal bruit)

  • MRI/MRA of the brain and neck

  • Echocardiography

  • Ophthalmologic evaluation

  • Thyroid function testing

If indicated

  • MRI/MRA of the chest (if aortic arch abnormalities suspected)

  • Other endocrine evaluations (e.g., for growth hormone deficiency, hypopituitarism, diabetes insipidus)

  • Airway evaluation/direct laryngoscopy

PELVIS syndrome has been used to describe infants with perineal IH in association with a variety of other malformations involving the genitourinary and GI tracts, lumbosacral spine, and spinal cord. The acronym PELVIS stands for p erineal hemangioma, e xternal genitalia malformations, l ipomyelomeningocele, v esicorenal abnormalities, i mperforate anus, and s kin tag. This association has also been known as SACRAL syndrome, which stands for s pinal dysraphism, a nogenital anomalies, c utaneous anomalies, and r enal and urologic anomalies associated with a ngioma of l umbosacral localization. This phenotype has also been expanded to include IHs involving not only the perineum but also the lumbosacral region, genitalia, and/or lower extremity by a group that suggested the terminology LUMBAR association, for l ower body IH and other cutaneous defects, u rogenital anomalies/ u lceration, m yelopathy, b ony deformities, a norectal malformations/ a rterial anomalies, and r enal anomalies. In this series, the IHs were noted to often be segmental as well as of the “minimal growth” phenotype ( Fig. 12.43 ; also see later). Other cutaneous findings that may be present include lipoma, skin tag, caudal appendix, hair tuft, and sacral dimple. PELVIS/SACRAL/LUMBAR syndrome has been likened to PHACES syndrome, although it affects the lower half of the body and should be considered in any infant with a segmental IH (including those with minimal growth) affecting the anogenital, lumbosacral, or lower extremity regions.

Fig. 12.43, PELVIS (perineal hemangioma, external genitalia malformations, lipomyelomeningocele, vesicorenal abnormalities, imperforate anus, and skin tag) syndrome. This infant has an infantile hemangioma with minimal growth involving the perineum (A), buttocks, and lumbosacral back (B) . His history was also notable for imperforate anus, tethered spinal cord, and a filar lipoma. Note the midline lumbosacral scar related to his cord-untethering surgery.

Abortive hemangioma refers to IHs that exhibit very little (if any) proliferation during the period of expected growth. These lesions typically present as reticulated vascular patches, often with fine telangiectasias, occasionally as grouped telangiectases overlying normal-appearing skin, or as blue patches with a peripheral halo. Small foci of typical bright red, superficial IH may be present around the periphery ( Fig. 12.44 ). Other terms that have been used to describe these lesions include plaque-telangiectatic hemangiomas, macular hemangioma with PWS-like appearance, reticular IH, minimal-growth hemangiomas, and IHs with minimal or arrested growth (IH-MAGs) . , Several authors have confirmed these lesions to be IH in origin via positive GLUT-1 immunostaining of biopsy specimens. IH-MAGs tend to present more commonly on the lower half of the body than typical IHs and may be associated with ulceration, especially when occurring in the anogenital area. They have also been reported in association with soft-tissue hypertrophy, particularly on the extremities.

Fig. 12.44, Abortive hemangioma (infantile hemangioma with minimal or arrested growth). This telangiectatic vascular patch presented on the medial calf of this 5-month-old boy. Note the scattered brighter red vascular macules and papules around the periphery, a classic feature in some of these lesions.

Congenital IHs are lesions that are fully formed at birth. These lesions may follow the typical time course of IH, may have a more accelerated involution phase, or may persist unchanged. Noninvoluting congenital hemangioma (NICH) is a specific subtype of IH also known as a congenital nonprogressive hemangioma. These lesions may be diagnosed in utero , are fully formed at birth, and do not show the postnatal proliferation characteristic of IH. Clinically, NICH lesions are round to ovoid, pink to purple tumors with overlying prominent telangiectasias and peripheral pallor ( Fig. 12.45 ). Importantly, these lesions also do not undergo the spontaneous involution typical of IH and hence appear to be a distinctive type of vascular lesion. Interestingly, NICH lesions also have a different histologic appearance and are not immunoreactive for GLUT-1.

Fig. 12.45, Hemangioma, noninvoluting congenital. Characteristic features include prominent surface telangiectasias and a peripheral rim of pallor.

Rapidly involuting congenital hemangioma (RICH) is the term used to describe a congenital IH that undergoes rapid involution early in life. These tumors may present similar to a NICH or may have the appearance of a typical IH. They may also present as small to large tumors with a red, violaceous, or gray appearance that may mimic other vascular (e.g., kaposiform hemangioendothelioma [KHE]; see Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma section) or malignant (e.g., rhabdomyosarcoma, fibrosarcoma) neoplasms. They often involute completely by 12 to 15 months of age ( Fig. 12.46 ) and may leave behind dermal and subcutaneous atrophy. RICH lesions may present as atrophic violaceous plaques, suggesting in utero involution. Lesions that begin and behave as a RICH but that involute only partially and then assume the appearance of a NICH have been termed partially involuting congenital hemangiomas (PICHs).

Fig. 12.46, Hemangioma, rapidly involuting congenital. This hemangioma was fully formed at birth (A) and involuted completely by 1 year of age (B) .

Diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis

Diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis (disseminated neonatal hemangiomatosis) describes multiple cutaneous lesions in conjunction with extracutaneous organ involvement. It must be differentiated from benign neonatal hemangiomatosis, in which the infant has multiple cutaneous lesions without any symptomatic visceral lesions or complications. , Patients with either type of hemangiomatosis may have only a few or up to hundreds of cutaneous IHs ( Figs. 12.47 and 12.48 ). Some authors advocate for the terminology multifocal IH with or without extracutaneous disease, noting that many cases reported in the literature as diffuse neonatal hemangiomatosis may actually represent other entities such as multifocal lymphangioendotheliomatosis with thrombocytopenia (see later this chapter).

Fig. 12.47, Hemangiomatosis, benign. This infant had multiple small lesions as shown on the trunk (A) and scalp (B) and no internal involvement.

Fig. 12.48, Hemangiomatosis, diffuse. This infant had variably sized lesions and liver hemangiomatosis.

Although past data suggested that the risk of internal involvement could be predicted by the number of cutaneous IHs, the traditional recommendation for internal imaging in patients with five or more lesions was more anecdotal than evidence based. Subsequently, in a prospective study comparing 151 infants with five or more IHs to 50 infants with between one and four IHs, hepatic hemangiomas were identified on hepatic ultrasound in 16% (24) of the infants with five or more cutaneous IHs and in none of the control group with one to four cutaneous IHs. The study also revealed that preterm (<37 weeks’ gestational age) delivery, multiple gestation, lower birthweight, in vitro fertilization, placental anomalies, and preeclampsia each occurred more often in infants with more than five cutaneous IHs, but on multivariate analysis only preterm delivery and lower birthweight were associated with having five or more cutaneous IHs. Of the 24 infants with hepatic hemangiomas, only two required therapy specifically for this finding. This study confirmed that infants with five or more IHs are at greater risk for hepatic hemangiomas (and should be evaluated with liver ultrasound) and that the majority of those with hepatic involvement remain asymptomatic and do not require therapy.

Although the most common extracutaneous site for IH in patients with diffuse hemangiomatosis is the liver, multiple other organs can be involved, including the intestine, brain, eyes, spleen, oral mucosa, kidney, and lungs. , The diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomatosis is usually made clinically and radiographically, because liver biopsy is undesirable as a result of the risk of bleeding. Liver lesions may be asymptomatic or present with hepatomegaly and congestive heart failure, the latter of which is believed to be the result of arteriovenous (AV) shunting, which leads to increased venous return and increased cardiac output. Occasionally anemia or thrombocytopenia are present.

Three patterns of liver hemangiomatosis have been proposed: focal, multifocal, and diffuse. Focal lesions are well defined and solitary on imaging and are most often clinically asymptomatic. They usually are not accompanied by cutaneous lesions and tend to involute rapidly. Multifocal liver hemangiomas present as multiple spherical tumors, which may be asymptomatic or can result in high-output cardiac failure secondary to AV shunting. These lesions involute after the same course as seen with cutaneous IH. Diffuse lesions are extensive, may result in near-total replacement of hepatic parenchyma, and may be associated with serious complications including vessel compression, respiratory decompensation, abdominal compartment syndrome, and multiorgan system failure. These lesions may also be associated with severe hypothyroidism. The transient hypothyroidism associated with hepatic IH is caused by hemangioma production of the thyroid hormone inactivating enzyme, type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase. Evaluation reveals elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), normal to decreased free thyroxine (fT4), decreased free triiodothyronine (fT3), and increased reverse T3 (rT3). Higher-than-normal replacement doses of levothyroxine may be required to achieve euthyroid status in these infants. ,

Abdominal ultrasonography with Doppler studies is the diagnostic modality of choice, although MRI or computed tomography (CT) may occasionally be necessary. Treatment options may include optimization of cardiac function, corticosteroids, propranolol, interferon-α, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, embolization, hepatic artery ligation, hepatic resection, and liver transplantation. , Propranolol has been increasingly reported as an effective therapy for hepatic IH, and in most patients improvement in the liver lesions correlates with resolution of heart failure and improvement or resolution in the associated hypothyroidism, when present. , Infants with diffuse liver hemangiomas should undergo thyroid hormone monitoring and replacement as necessary. Most visceral hemangiomas, like the cutaneous lesions, grow during infancy and in surviving children regress during early childhood. Other evaluations that may be useful in the investigation for diffuse hemangiomatosis include complete blood cell counts, stool examinations for occult blood, liver function studies, urinalysis, echocardiography, electrocardiography, and CNS imaging when clinically indicated.

Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon

Kasabach–Merritt phenomenon (KMP; also known as Kasabach–Merritt syndrome ) is characterized by thrombocytopenia (owing to platelet trapping), coagulopathy, and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia in association with a rapidly enlarging vascular lesion. It was traditionally felt to be a complication of IH but is now well established to be associated with vascular tumors other than IH, namely KHE and tufted angioma. These lesions have characteristics that clinically distinguish them from hemangiomas (see later). KMP occurs most often within the first few weeks of life and presents with sudden enlargement of the vascular lesion, ecchymosis, prolonged bleeding, epistaxis, hematuria, or hematochezia. The cutaneous lesions show purpura, edema, induration, and an advancing ecchymotic margin ( Fig. 12.49 ). In addition to thrombocytopenia, other laboratory findings include anemia, hypofibrinogenemia, elevated D-dimers, fragmentation of erythrocytes on manual smear, and prolonged coagulation studies. The mortality rate is high, from 10% to 30%.

Fig. 12.49, Kasabach–Merritt phenomenon. Note the deep purple color of this vascular tumor, which suddenly enlarged and became firm, with accompanying thrombocytopenia.

Kaposiform Hemangioendothelioma

KHE is a locally aggressive vascular tumor, so named because of the histologic resemblance to Kaposi sarcoma. It presents as a firm, subcutaneous nodule or plaque that expands rapidly and often has a violaceous discoloration ( Fig. 12.50 ). , Although KHE usually presents in infancy, it may appear months to years later. In addition to involvement of the skin, KHE may involve the deep soft tissues ( Fig. 12.51 ) and the bone. The consensus-derived treatment recommendation for KHEs that require therapy based on growth or symptoms, but without KMP, is oral prednisolone with or without adjunctive aspirin.

Fig. 12.50, Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma. These tumors are characteristically deep purple in color and may be associated with Kasabach–Merritt phenomenon.

Fig. 12.51, Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma. This tumor on the medial thigh of a 10-year-old boy had been present since early infancy and extended to the deeper subcutaneous tissues. He never developed Kasabach–Merritt phenomenon. Note the secondary pyogenic granuloma–like papule that developed at the superior border.

Tufted angioma

Tufted angioma (TA) is actually named after its histologic appearance, which reveals groups of dermal capillary tufts. These lesions present clinically as erythematous, annular nodules, or plaques, often with induration ( Fig. 12.52 ). , Although these lesions may spontaneously involute over years, they tend to persist or gradually progress in most patients. Both KHE and TA are usually easily distinguished clinically from IH, although in some patients either of the former two may mimic the latter. Treatment with low-dose aspirin has been advocated as safe and effective for TA lesions that are large or symptomatic yet not associated with KMP.

Fig. 12.52, Tufted angioma. This vascular plaque was mildly indurated to palpation.

Treatment for KMP is challenging. Multiple different regimens have been reported without randomized studies to support or refute their efficacy. It seems clear that a multidisciplinary approach is optimal, including medical and surgical components of diagnosis and therapy. Hematologic therapies include red blood cell transfusions, administration of fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate, and antiplatelet therapy. Many experts recommend minimization of platelet transfusions given the risks of further platelet trapping and further expansion of the tumor. High-dose corticosteroids, antifibrinolytics, interferon-α, vincristine, sirolimus, cyclophosphamide, and antiplatelet therapy (particularly dual platelet blockade such as ticlopidine and aspirin) have been most often advocated. Corticosteroid monotherapy appears to be effective in only a small subset of patients. , Vincristine was demonstrated useful in a retrospective study of 15 patients with KMP based on increased platelet count and fibrinogen level and decreased size of the tumor. Four of these patients had a relapse and were again treated successfully with the agent. Vincristine in combination with corticosteroids is considered first-line treatment for many experts, including the expert panel consensus-derived recommendation for KHE complicated by KMP. , , Combination vincristine and ticlopidine, without or with aspirin (vincristine-aspirin-ticlopidine [VAT] therapy), has been reported useful in several patients with KMP. , The alternative mTOR inhibitor everolimus was reported very effective in two patients with KHE, one of whom had associated KMP and another with a treatment-resistant tumor involving the femur. , Early surgical intervention with full resection has been advocated for smaller lesions where this modality is feasible. Other reported treatments include embolization, compression (usually in combination with other medical therapies), and radiation therapy. , Transcatheter arterial embolization plus vincristine was reported effective in a cohort of 17 infants with corticosteroid-resistant KMP. Propranolol was associated with clinical response in only 25% of patients with KMP in one series, suggesting the need for further study of this agent; however, it was reportedly useful when dosed at higher levels than typically used for IH or when used in combination with corticosteroids.

Pyogenic granuloma

Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a common acquired vascular lesion of the skin and mucous membranes in infants and children. It presents as a bright red to red-brown, raised, slightly pedunculated or sessile papulonodule ( Figs. 12.53 and 12.54 ). The base of sessile lesions may reveal a peripheral collarette of scale ( Fig. 12.55 ). Although its appearance is usually solitary, PG may occasionally present as several lesions. In addition, secondary PG-like proliferations may occasionally occur on the surface of an existing PWS ( Fig. 12.56 ), usually in the older child or young adult. Multiple, or “agminated,” PG lesions have been reported in the setting of preexisting congenital vascular stains as well as in areas of preceding scalding burns. , PG is at risk for superficial ulceration and bleeding, which usually brings the patient to medical attention. The pathogenesis of PG is unknown. Despite the name, the lesions are not considered infectious. Although they may occur on any skin surface, they most commonly appear in areas subject to trauma, especially the hands, fingers, forearms, face, and occasionally the mucosal surfaces of the mouth. They have been described on the penile shaft after circumcision. Although histologic evaluation is usually not necessary for diagnosis, pathologic examination reveals changes similar to those of a well-circumscribed IH.

Fig. 12.53, Pyogenic granuloma. An acquired, vascular papule.

Fig. 12.54, Pyogenic granuloma. This lesion is multilobulated.

Fig. 12.55, Pyogenic granuloma. This lesion demonstrates the collarette of skin around the base of the lesion.

Fig. 12.56, This young girl with Klippel–Trénaunay syndrome has multiple, pyogenic granuloma–like papules overlying a port wine stain of her lower extremity.

The traditional therapy for PG is simple shave excision followed by treatment of the base with electrodesiccation, which achieves hemostasis and seems to help prevent recurrence. PDL therapy may be useful for the treatment of smaller lesions, and the continuous wave/pulsed carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) laser has also been demonstrated effective. Topical imiquimod cream, an immune response modifier, may be helpful in some patients. , Timolol solution, a topical β-blocker as discussed earlier in the section on IH, has also been reported effective in the treatment of PG.

Bacillary angiomatosis

Bacillary angiomatosis (BA) is an exanthem characterized by cutaneous vascular lesions in association with Bartonella (previously Rochalimaea ) infections. Bartonella species also cause cat-scratch disease, prolonged fever, hepatosplenic disease, ocular manifestations (including Parinaud oculoglandular syndrome), encephalopathy, hemolytic anemia, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, glomerulonephritis, and pulmonary disease. BA occurs primarily in immunocompromised individuals and was originally described (and once seen quite commonly) in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). It has been rarely documented in immunocompetent children. , BA is caused by B. henselae and B. quintana , and transmission is via the body louse, a cat scratch, or cat fleas. The lesions may involve various tissues, including brain, bone, lymph nodes, GI tract, respiratory tract, and bone marrow. Osseous lesions are most commonly seen with B. quintana infection, and visceral involvement is caused almost solely by B. henselae. However, skin lesions are the most common manifestation, may be caused by both species, and present as disseminated red to purple papules generally no larger than 1 to 2 cm in diameter. The clinical differential diagnosis may include PG and Kaposi sarcoma. Occasionally, BA may present with ulcerative lesions. Liver peliosis is a similar condition affecting the liver and lymph nodes and usually caused by B. quintana.

The diagnosis of BA is confirmed by tissue biopsy with histologic examination, which reveals vascular proliferation and plump endothelial cells with the infecting bacilli identified on Warthin–Starry stain. Culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies, and serologic testing can also be useful in confirming the diagnosis. The possibility of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection should be considered if BA is diagnosed. The disorder usually responds to antibiotic therapy with erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, doxycycline, or rifampin. ,

Glomus tumor

Glomus tumor (glomangioma, glomuvenous malformation) is a benign vascular lesion that usually presents as a blue papule or nodule. It represents a relatively uncommon hamartoma of the glomus body, which is a temperature-regulating AV shunt that bypasses the usual capillary bed of the dermis. The glomus cell, which proliferates in this disorder, is a modified smooth-muscle cell. Rarely seen in infants, these lesions may be solitary or multiple and occur in children as well as adults. Occasionally, nodular or plaque-like lesions may also occur.

Solitary glomus tumors, which represent 90% of all lesions, do not appear to have a familial tendency. They are characterized by the clinical triad of paroxysmal pain, local tenderness, and cold sensitivity. Solitary lesions present as a blue-red nodule ( Fig. 12.57 ) from 1 mm to several centimeters in size. They most often appear on the upper extremities, particularly the nailbeds, and occasionally on the lower extremities, head, neck, or penis. Although the cause is unknown, some lesions appear to be associated with previous trauma. The differential diagnosis of a solitary glomus tumor includes VM, blue nevus, melanoma, dermatofibroma, and leiomyoma. If occurring in an infant, IH may also be in the differential.

Fig. 12.57, Solitary glomus tumor.

In contrast to the solitary type, multiple glomus tumors (often referred to as glomuvenous malformations ) are often dominantly transmitted, may be painful or painless, and vary from a few lesions to several hundred. The familial nature may not be obvious because family members may have small lesions and never seek treatment. They are relatively more common in children than adults, and although they can occur anywhere on the cutaneous surface, the majority involve the lower extremities. They may be regionally distributed or generalized, and segmental patterns of presentation have been reported. , Affected individuals usually have truncating mutations in the glomulin (GLMN) gene. Multiple glomus tumors appear as blue-purple, flat to dome-shaped papules, plaques, and nodules ( Fig. 12.58 ) that vary from a few millimeters to several centimeters in size. The differential diagnosis of multiple glomus tumors includes leiomyomas, diffuse hemangiomatosis, and blue rubber–bleb nevi. Multiple glomus tumors, preferentially involving the fingers and toes, have been reported in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1. ,

Fig. 12.58, Multiple glomus tumors. This patient had multiple blue papules and papulonodules.

A congenital variant of glomus tumor (plaque-type glomus tumor or glomuvenous malformation) has been described and is characterized by a blue-red, nodular plaque that may be painful, may show atrophy centrally, and tends to grow proportionate with the child’s growth. , Congenital facial plaque-like glomus tumors may mimic VMs and can be quite disfiguring.

Treatment of glomus tumors consists primarily of surgical excision, although this is not a feasible option for patients with multiple lesions and recurrence tends to be common. Sclerotherapy has been used with some success, as have CO 2 lasers. Subungual glomus tumors are usually treated successfully with periungual or transungual surgical excision, although residual nail deformities may result.

Hemangiopericytoma

Hemangiopericytoma is a rare tumor that occurs in both an adult and a childhood form, although children account for fewer than 10% of all cases. Congenital lesions are occasionally observed. , This tumor arises from pericytes, which are smooth-muscle cells that surround capillaries and postcapillary venules. Skin, subcutaneous, and muscular tissues may be involved, and any part of the body can be affected, the most common location being the lower extremities. Some experts suggest that a majority of lesions previously called hemangiopericytomas actually represent solitary fibrous tumors (originating from fibroblasts), and there is a likely relationship between these tumors and infantile myofibromatosis. ,

Hemangiopericytoma may present in a variety of fashions without a distinctive or pathognomonic appearance. It often presents as a deep soft-tissue mass with slow growth. It may be flesh colored or have a blue-red hue. Multicentric lesions have been described in infants and tend to behave in a fashion similar to their solitary counterparts. , The diagnosis of hemangiopericytoma is based on the cellular and architectural features on tissue histologic examination.

The prognosis of this tumor in childhood is variable. It appears that children younger than 1 year of age (in which case, it is termed infantile hemangiopericytoma or the congenital/infantile form of hemangiopericytoma ) have a better prognosis with a high response to chemotherapy. In children older than 1 year of age, the tumor behaves more similarly to those in adults and may be more aggressive. Treatment consists of complete surgical resection when feasible, as well as radiotherapy and, when more extensive, chemotherapy.

Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia

Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia (ALHE) is an uncommon vascular proliferation disorder occurring most commonly in young adult women and only rarely in children. It presents as a subcutaneous mass of the head and neck region, especially around the ears or on the scalp. Regional lymph node enlargement and eosinophilia may be present, and treatment is usually by surgical excision, although observation, cryotherapy, laser ablation, steroids, radiation, and chemotherapy have been reported.

Kimura disease is a closely related, yet distinct, chronic inflammatory disorder that occurs primarily in young Asian males. It is characterized by the triad of painless subcutaneous nodules in the head or neck region, blood and tissue eosinophilia, and elevated serum immunoglobulin (Ig) E levels. Clinically, the lesions of Kimura disease present as solitary or multiple, purple-red papules, nodules, or deep swellings. The parotid and submandibular glands may be involved, as may the oral mucosa, scalp, ears, or orbit. Unilateral cervical lymphadenopathy is commonly present. Laboratory evaluation consistently reveals eosinophilia and increased IgE. Pediatric Kimura disease may be associated with nephritic syndrome, urticaria, and eczema.

ALHE and Kimura disease may be confused with a variety of other entities, most commonly malignancies such as lymphoma, salivary gland tumors, or histiocytosis. These disorders histologically reveal vascular proliferation with eosinophils and mast cells, and their etiology remains unclear. Trauma may precede its onset, and it has been reported as a rare complication of ear piercing. Treatment options for ALHE include surgical excision (although recurrence is common), steroids, chemotherapy, pulsed dye laser therapy, and radiation; propranolol was reported as effective in a young adult woman with the condition. ,

Vascular malformations and malformation syndromes

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here