Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) was first isolated from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of adults with lymphoproliferative diseases and HIV infection and was named human B-lymphotropic virus. When additional isolates were identified in CD4 + lymphocytes, further characterization indicated that the virus was a herpesvirus. Because it was the sixth member of the herpesvirus family, it was renamed Human herpesvirus 6. Two years after its initial isolation, HHV-6 was discovered in the lymphocytes of four infants with roseola. Subsequently, HHV-6 was established as the prime cause of this common illness of the young, which for many decades was prophetically known as “the sixth exanthematous disease of childhood.” HHV-6 is an important pathogen in young children globally, and as is characteristic of herpesviruses, it subsequently establishes persistent, latent, and lifelong infection.
HHV-6A, HHV-6B, and HHV-7 comprise the Roseolovirus genus of the subfamily β-Herpesvirinae. They have the characteristic human herpesvirus family morphology and structure: an electron-dense nucleic acid core encased in an icosahedral capsid surrounded by proteins collectively known as the tegument and an outer envelope containing proteins and glycoproteins in a lipid bilayer. The linear, double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) genome of HHV-6 is 160–170 kilobases (kb) and has a unique central region (U), which contains open reading frames (ORFs) U1–U100 bounded on each end by terminal direct repeats (tDR). HHV-6A, HHV-6B, and HHV-7 all share limited homology with human cytomegalovirus (CMV), the only other human β-herpesvirus. , The overall nucleotide sequence identity between HHV-6A and HHV-6B is approximately 90%, but less in the direct repeats (85%) and U86–U100 (72%). , HHV-6A and HHV-6B are colinear with minimal (<1%) intragroup variation. Although HHV-6A and HHV-6B initially were classified as separate subgroups of HHV-6, in 2012, the two were recognized officially as distinct species based on differences in biology, immunology, epidemiology, and disease associations.
HHV-6B causes almost all primary infections in infants and is the predominant virus associated with reactivated infection in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. , However, in a previous report from an African population, most of the infant infections were associated with HHV-6A. More recent data have not confirmed this finding. HHV-6 infects mature T lymphocytes in vitro, especially activated CD4 + cells. However, in contrast to the findings of the in vitro studies, HHV-6B replicates more efficiently in monocytes and macrophages during acute infection than in CD4 + cells. HHV-6 also can infect multiple other cell types, including B lymphocytes, fibroblasts, natural killer (NK) cells, and neuronal, epithelial, and endothelial cells. , , Growth is characterized by cellular ballooning, lysis, and cell death.
HHV-6A uses CD46 as a cellular receptor. This receptor is expressed on the surface of all human nucleated cells, which may partly explain the wide in vitro cellular tropism and tissue distribution of HHV-6A. Viral binding occurs through the interaction of CD46 with the glycoprotein complex HHV-6A gHgLgQ1gQ2. The same complex is responsible for the binding of HHV-6B to the newly identified receptor CD134 (OX40), a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily present on the surface of activated T lymphocytes. For both viruses, the interaction between the cellular gp96 and HHV-6 gQ1 proteins has an important role in establishing infection. Differences in the gQ1 and gQ2 nucleotide sequences between HHV-6A and HHV-6B are thought to play a role in defining receptor specificity and tissue tropism.
After primary infection, HHV-6A and HHV-6B establish latency in monocytes and macrophages and possibly in other sites, such as hematopoietic stem cells (HCT; CD34 + ) and the central nervous system (CNS). , Persistent infection can occur in the salivary glands. , The structure of the HHV-6 genome during latency appears to be maintained by chromosomal integration and/or by closed circular molecules, similar to episomes of other herpesviruses, with only a few viral genes expressed. , ,
Reactivation occurs with multiple but poorly defined stimuli and can be asymptomatic or result in organ-specific diseases. Usually, reactivation in a healthy person is clinically occult. Occasionally, primary infection with a closely related virus (e.g., HHV-7) can result in HHV-6 reactivation associated with viremia and a febrile illness.
Neutralizing antibodies to multiple HHV-6 proteins, especially to linear and conformational epitopes of the glycoproteins, develop after primary HHV-6B infection. Immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody usually appears in the first week of illness and disappears within 1–2 months. IgG antibody appears during the second week after the onset of illness, and concentrations and avidity peak within 1–2 months. , , The antibody response to primary infection occurs despite the presence of maternal antibody but can be dampened by high levels of passive antibody. Humoral antibody appears to be protective because illness is uncommon during the first few months of life when maternal antibody is present in high concentration ( Fig. 207.1 ). As transplacental antibody concentrations decline, infants rapidly acquire HHV-6B infection. HHV-6 IgG antibody titers subsequently fluctuate and can be boosted by infection with other closely related herpesviruses. The immunologic response after primary infection usually protects against subsequent episodes of viremia and clinical illness. HHV-6 antibody is detectable throughout life, as evidenced by its almost universal presence in the cord blood of neonates.
Clinical observations suggest that cellular immunity is critical in the control, persistence, and reactivation of HHV-6B infection. Patients with compromised cellular immunity, especially HCT and solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients, are most prone to developing disease with HHV-6B reactivation. The effects of HHV-6 on the innate and adaptive cellular responses are incompletely defined but appear to be complex. Multiple observations indicate that HHV-6 can modulate and circumvent the body’s immune response, enhancing the pathogenesis of primary infection and favoring lifetime survival of the virus. ,
HHV-6B infection has a worldwide distribution and no seasonal or gender predilection. , , Primary infection usually occurs between 6 months and 3 years of age, , which matches the typical age distribution of roseola. , Studies of HHV-6B primary illness in Japan and the US show similar age distributions, with relatively few cases before 6 months or after 2–3 years of age. , , The peak period of acquisition is between 6 and 12 months; the median is about 8 months of age. , , ,
HHV-6B is a significant cause of acute febrile illness in infants 6–18 months of age, and it is responsible for about 20% of visits to emergency departments for acute illness in infants 6–12 months of age ( Fig. 207.1 ). , Infection is ubiquitous, and in most areas studied, essentially all adults are seropositive. , Some geographic differences may exist, and in some countries, the age of acquisition of initial infection is later than in the US. HHV-6A has not been associated clearly with a distinct disease, and significant cross-reactivity between HHV-6A and HHV-6B in standard serologic assays has limited epidemiologic investigations.
The main mode of transmission of HHV-6B to young children appears to be through respiratory secretions containing the virus that are asymptomatically shed by close contacts. This possibility is supported by data demonstrating that children who acquired HHV-6B infection before their first birthday were more likely to practice saliva sharing behaviors. Additionally, HHV-6B DNA has been identified in 60% of nasal mucus specimens from healthy volunteers, which suggests that respiratory droplet transmission is probable. In a prospective study of the epidemiology of roseola in 1941, Breese observed that infants with roseola lacked a history of contact with children with a similar disease and likely acquired the virus from asymptomatically shedding family members. Kempe and colleagues in 1950 demonstrated that both the serum and respiratory secretions of an infant with clinical roseola could transmit the disease after an incubation period of 10 days in humans (vs. about 5 days in monkeys). Subsequent molecular and epidemiologic studies have confirmed that HHV-6B DNA is detectable after primary infection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, saliva, and salivary glands. , , Although HHV-6 persists in salivary glands, isolation of HHV-6B from oropharyngeal secretions is rare. , ,
Although the incubation period for HHV-6B infection has not been established, the Kempe study suggests it is about 10 days, and primary infection has been documented in the first several weeks of life. , , , The detection of HHV-6B DNA in the genital secretions of pregnant women and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of some infants in the first few weeks of life supports the possibility of perinatal HHV-6B transmission. , , Human milk is not a likely source of perinatal infection because the prevalence among breastfed and bottle-fed infants does not differ, and HHV-6 DNA has not been identified in human milk. ,
HHV-6B is latent in bone marrow progenitor cells and therefore can be transmitted to recipients of bone marrow transplants or to those receiving SOTs. HHV-6 infection with chromosomally integrated virus (ciHHV-6), characterized by high viral loads, also can be established in bone marrow and solid organ recipients after transplantation from a donor with ciHHV-6.
Congenitally acquired infections, determined by detection of HHV-6 DNA in cord blood, occur in about 1% of newborns. , , Intrauterine HHV-6 infections can result from transplacentally passed maternal infection or from ciHHV-6 passed through the germline. , The latter appears to account for most (86%) congenital infections. HHV-6 has the unique ability among human herpesviruses to integrate as a whole, partial, or rearranged genome into chromosomes of some individuals. , ciHHV-6 is estimated to occur in 0.2%–1% of Japanese, UK, and US populations. , , , Among the small number of people reported to have ciHHV-6 infection, integration has occurred invariably in the telomeric region of a chromosome’s short or long arm. , Thus far, at least nine different chromosomes have been identified. , ,
When ciHHV-6 is passed through the germline, the HHV-6 genome is present in every nucleated cell , ; as a result, high viral loads are seen in all blood and other specimens. , These two distinctive biologic characteristics allow the diagnosis of ciHHV-6 infection by the detection of HHV-6 DNA in all cells of two different lineages (e.g., cord or peripheral blood mononuclear cells and hair follicles) or by demonstration of constantly and persistently high viral loads in peripheral blood. , A sizeable proportion of these congenital infections are caused by HHV-6A, whereas HHV-6B accounts for essentially all postnatally acquired infections. Children with ciHHV-6 infection have no distinctive clinical findings at birth. However, one study found that children with ciHHV-6 had significantly lower global developmental test scores at 1 year of age compared with children without congenital HHV-6 infection, which supports a possible pathologic effect. Evidence suggests that ciHHV-6 can reactivate, replicate, and cause disease in the immunocompromised, as demonstrated by increased acute graft versus host disease following HCT transplant when donors or recipients have ciHHV-6 as compared to HCT transplants without inherited chromosomally integrated virus. ,
Children with a transplacentally acquired congenital infection usually appear normal at birth. The initial diagnosis requires the detection of HHV-6 DNA in cord blood mononuclear cells. , With transplacental infection, HHV-6 DNA subsequently can be detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and saliva, but not consistently or in the high viral loads observed with ciHHV-6 congenital infections. Most transplacentally acquired congenital infections appear to result from maternal reactivated ciHHV-6. ,
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here