Abbreviations

ALT

alanine aminotransferase

APRI

AST to platelet ratio index

AST

aspartate aminotransferase

cART

combination antiretroviral therapy

FIB-4

fibrosis 4 score

HA

hyaluronic acid

HAV

hepatitis A virus

HBV

hepatitis B virus

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV

hepatitis C virus

HDV

hepatitis Delta virus

HEV

hepatitis E virus

HIV

human immunodeficiency virus

MRE

magnetic resonance elastography

NAFLD/NASH

nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

TE

transient elastography

TRAIL

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand

Introduction

Liver disease is an important source of morbidity and mortality in those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Indeed, in Western countries, liver disease is ranked among the top three causes of attributable death in those with HIV. The etiologies of liver disease are diverse and include chronic viral infections, nonalcoholic fatty liver/steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH), and drug toxicities ( Table 37-1 ). Hepatic fibrosis appears to be accelerated due to the presence of a persistent state of immune activation, and perhaps due in part to direct HIV infection of stellate cells that leads to activation and excess collagen deposition. In addition, combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) used to suppress HIV replication can directly and indirectly lead to liver injury. Healthcare providers, including hepatologists who manage HIV-infected patients, need to be familiar with the subtleties of managing these patients, as drug-drug interactions and their effects on the liver can impact management and interpretation of common laboratory tests.

TABLE 37-1
Liver Diseases in Persons With HIV
Common diseases

  • Hepatitis C virus

  • Hepatitis B virus

  • Nonalcoholic fatty liver

  • Alcoholic fatty liver

  • Drug-induced liver injury

Uncommon diseases

  • Hepatitis Delta virus

  • Hepatitis E virus

  • Epstein Barr virus

  • Cytomegalovirus

  • Fungal infections

  • Parasitic infections

  • Bartonella infection

  • Mycobacterial infections

  • Kaposi sarcoma

  • AIDS cholangiopathy

Epidemiology of Liver Disease in Those With HIV Infection

The importance of liver disease as a factor in the morbidity and mortality of those with HIV infection was not appreciated until the mid- to late-1990s. The introduction of highly effective antiretroviral agents changed the epidemiology of HIV-associated death previously attributable to opportunistic infections. Multiple large cohort studies have demonstrated the significant impact of liver-related processes on patient survival. In the French Mortavic study, 26,000 HIV-infected patients were followed between 1995 and 2010. AIDS-related morbidity accounted for 20% of the recorded deaths, followed by 13% attributable to chronic liver diseases. The Data collection on Adverse events of Anti-HIV Drugs (D : A : D) study cohort followed HIV-infected patients between 1999 and 2011 in the United States, Europe, and Australia. The study enrolled 49,731 patients representing 308,719 person-years of follow-up. The leading cause of death was AIDS-related diseases followed by non-AIDS malignancies, with 13% of deaths attributed to liver disease, making it the second leading cause of non-AIDS death in the cohort. With combination antiretroviral therapies, patients are living longer with HIV and liver disease has emerged as a leading etiology of serious disease and death. These observations opened the door to our deeper understanding that chronic viral infections of the liver, drug toxicity, and fatty liver disease often led to accelerated disease outcomes among HIV-infected patients. The epidemiology of liver disease has not been static but has evolved as new treatment modalities for HIV, as well as prevention strategies, have modified the disease processes ( Fig. 37-1 ). The blood supply, which was highly contaminated with both hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV in the early 1980s, has been effectively eliminated as a source of these infections. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, severe and sometimes fulminant liver disease was found to be attributable to hepatitis B infection during either immune reconstitution or lamivudine breakthrough. Recognition of this issue and the widespread use of antiretroviral agents such as tenofovir as part of the cART backbone incidentally led to reductions in severe liver disease attributable to chronic hepatitis B infection. Pioneering work by Benhamou et al. established that HCV infection was associated with more rapid progression of hepatic fibrosis in the setting of HIV/HCV coinfection. However, it has taken more than a decade to appreciate that HIV suppression played a key role in slowing HCV-associated liver disease progression. Many early antiretroviral agents were highly hepatotoxic but were used because of a lack of safer options. Overall, the evolution of treatment for HIV has led to the use of agents with little or no intrinsic drug hepatotoxicity.

Fig. 37-1, Changing epidemiology of liver disease etiologies in HIV patients.

New disease processes are being increasingly recognized as key players in liver disease. Hepatitis E was not thought to play an important role in disease in Western countries, but is increasingly recognized as a common pathogen in those areas. Relatively recently came the observation that HIV-infected persons and other immunosuppressed populations can develop chronic HEV infection and that this can be a source of progressive hepatic fibrosis leading to cirrhosis. Hepatitis D is well recognized, but has been poorly characterized in the HIV population. Long-term use of antiretroviral agents has played a role in fat redistribution and development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH), which is increasingly recognized as a factor in progressive liver disease among those with HIV.

Changes in population behavior can also significantly influence changes in overall epidemiology. There has been a significant uptick in new acute HCV infections among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSMs) which is in part attributed to increased high-risk sexual behavior. This is thought to be linked to serosorting in which HIV-positive men, effectively managed on cART, believe that they can engage in high-risk behaviors without consequence. A significant change in drug-use patterns with emergence of injection drug use of heroin has appeared in the Eastern United States throughout the past several years. This outbreak, which in some areas includes HIV/HCV coinfections, is a nonurban epidemic in young adults.

Mechanisms of Liver Disease Unique to HIV

It is reasonable to assume that known mechanisms of liver injury that have been elucidated for a variety of etiologies in those without HIV infection also apply when HIV infection is present. There are notable exceptions, however. For example, early studies of HBV infection in persons with HIV documented decreased risk of liver injury in patients with low CD4 counts. This reflects the immunologic nature of liver injury associated with HBV and can be significantly modulated by immune dysfunction. Overall, the patient with HIV represents a unique environment with extrinsic factors that modulate normal responses leading to either accentuation or diminution of phenotypic outcomes ( Fig. 37-2 ).

Fig. 37-2, Mechanisms of liver disease in HIV.

After HIV infection, there is an early and rapid loss of mucosal tight junctions in the gut, associated with profound loss of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). This alteration leads to gut leakiness associated with translocation of bacteria and bacterial remnants into the splanchnic circulation. Most typically, these are defined by the presence of endotoxin, though other less well-defined bacterial components are probably involved. These substances enter the liver and lead to significant Kupffer cell depletion. Failure to clear these products completely leads to a generalized state of immune activation. Simultaneously, infected individuals have both decreased T cell–mediated immune responses and activation of innate immune pathways which have the potential to lead to hepatic fibrosis associated with an altered cytokine microenvironment. Despite strong suppression of HIV and increases in peripheral CD4 counts with antiretroviral agents, there appears to be little restoration of gut immune function and HIV infection is characterized by persistent immune activation.

HIV infects and replicates mainly in CD4+ T cells. It binds using C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5), and in later infection the CXC-receptor 4 (CXCR4) which are highly expressed on CD4+ cells. However, other cell types, including hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells, also express these receptors. Infected T cells produce not only virions but also large amounts of gp120 protein that can be found in the circulation in HIV-infected individuals. Both gp120 and HIV virions can bind to their cognate receptors on hepatocytes and stellate cells where they activate various innate immune pathways. Interaction of gp120 and HIV virions with CXCR4 on hepatocytes up-regulates TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) leading to apoptosis mediated by JNK II. Increased reactive oxygen species may facilitate nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)-mediated fibrosis progression. Engagement of surface chemokine receptors also increases transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-β1) expression. This may be a driver of HCV replication.

Initiation of appropriate cART rapidly decreases HIV viral loads in most patients. Flares of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, particularly in those with HCV infection are well described. Whereas a portion of these may be attributable to drug toxicity (see below), recent efforts to elucidate this process have revealed that there is a complex interplay between HIV suppression and down-regulation of interferon-stimulated genes associated with innate immune responses. This results in increased HCV viral replication, which in the setting of immune reconstitution is accompanied by increased apoptosis, and transient ALT increases. Liver biopsy findings are not consistent with drug hepatotoxicity and in fact show decreases in hepatic inflammation. ALT and HCV flares tend to resolve within 48 weeks with what appears to be establishment of a new set point, leading to lower levels of circulating HCV RNA.

Chronic use of cART may lead to ongoing liver injury. Both didanosine and stavudine demonstrate increased risk of mitochondrial toxicity, relative to other nucleoside/nucleotide analogs. Protease inhibitors may lead to liver injury by affecting retinoic acid–binding proteins. Drug hypersensitivity reactions are seen with abacavir and nevirapine. Except for the immune-mediated injury processes, hepatocyte injury tends to be dose-dependent. Thus, high doses of ritonavir are intrinsically hepatotoxic, but boosting doses are generally safe. Drug-related hepatotoxicity is examined in greater detail below.

Liver Biopsy and Noninvasive Markers of Liver Disease Severity

Accurate determination of the presence and degree of hepatic fibrosis is essential for prognostication and guiding treatment decisions in patients with chronic liver diseases. Percutaneous liver biopsy remains the gold standard for assessing hepatic fibrosis, and has traditionally been considered the key diagnostic tool in determining the degree of inflammation and fibrosis in chronic liver disease. Liver biopsy also provides additional information regarding factors that might affect disease progression such as steatosis. Liver biopsy, however, is invasive and carries a complication rate ranging from 1% to 5%, with the risk of mortality ranging from 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10,000. Risks may be higher in certain patients with HIV/AIDS, as lesions at high risk of bleeding (e.g., peliosis hepatitis) are more likely to be present and alternate sampling modalities such as transjugular liver biopsy may be employed. Because of the risks associated with liver biopsy, there have been attempts to identify noninvasive tests or surrogate markers that could accurately predict liver histology. These include simple laboratory tests, such as serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR), albumin, and bilirubin either alone or in combination. However, because a high proportion of coinfected patients can have a normal ALT at the time of liver biopsy despite having significant histologic abnormalities, especially in those with HCV compared with those with HCV monoinfected individuals, serum liver enzymes alone may not be that useful. Because most data on noninvasive assessment of liver disease severity and fibrosis are from patients with HIV/HCV coinfection with far fewer studies of patients with HIV/HBV and HIV/NAFLD, we will focus on the HIV/HCV-coinfected population.

Given the risks of liver biopsy, paired with the need to assess liver fibrosis in those with HIV and abnormal liver enzymes, particularly in the HIV/HCV-coinfected population, there has been increased evaluation of noninvasive markers of fibrosis in the coinfected population. Various biochemical markers and imaging modalities have been validated in the HCV monoinfected population, but require further understanding of limitations in those with HIV.

Noninvasive Fibrosis Assessment Using Biochemical Markers

There have been several models developed to help differentiate mild to moderate fibrosis from advanced fibrosis in HIV/HCV and HIV/HBV-coinfected patients and patients with NASH. These models include both routine and nonroutine laboratory tests. Routine laboratory tests include secondary markers of liver injury and fibrosis including serum AST, ALT, and albumin, as well as indirect markers including platelet count. Nonroutine tests tend to represent more direct measures of collagen deposition or liver function and include tests of hepatic metabolic activity, extracellular matrix remodeling proteins, collagen synthesis and degradation products, and enzymes involved in matrix degradation. Many of these algorithms were initially developed for the HCV monoinfected population, but it has been determined that the correlation between fibrosis markers and fibrosis stage and the diagnostic performance of these tests is similar in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Because most HIV/HBV patients are on cART that includes suppression of HBV, these models have not been well studied in HBV coinfection and may not perform well. Similarly, there have been few studies on liver histology in those with NAFLD and HIV. Table 37-2 shows common noninvasive tests used in the HIV/HCV coinfection setting. These include AST to platelet ratio index (APRI), the Forns index, fibrosis 4 score (FIB-4), and the Hospital Gregorio Maranon (HGM) indices. Models derived from routine tests are most ideal, if proven accurate, because they are both cost-effective and readily available.

TABLE 37-2
Performance of Common Noninvasive Assessment of Significant Fibrosis in Patients With HIV/HCV Coinfection
Test Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) AUROC Comments
APRI 41 95 88-100 64-80 0.85 Simple index, best at ends of spectrum
Forns 94 51 40-94 96-100 0.81 Includes nonroutine tests
FIB-4 70 97 65 97 0.76 Simple test developed in coinfection, best at excluding fibrosis
Fibrosure/ Fibrotest 87 59 63 85 0.87 Requires special test, false positives in those increased inflammation and those on cART that increases bilirubin
SHASTA 88 72 74 76 0.83
Elastography 56 91 88 56 0.80 Increasingly used and can be combined with APRI/FIB-4

AST to Platelet Ratio Index

The APRI is a formula that utilizes measurements of serum AST concentration and platelet count. Its value is determined by the formula {(AST / [upper limit of normal]) / (platelet count [10 9 /L] × 100)}. APRI has been found to be accurate in estimating significant fibrosis (F2 or higher by METAVIR scoring) in patients with HCV and patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. In a coinfected cohort of HIV/HCV patients an AUROC of 0.847 for significant fibrosis was shown, with positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% for APRI greater than 1.5 and for ruling out significant fibrosis, APRI less than 0.5 was found to have PPV of 79%. Some studies, however, have reported that APRI cannot replace liver biopsy in the accurate staging of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C monoinfection, with one study noting its inability to correctly classify 40% to 65% of patients with chronic HCV or HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. This casts some doubt on the overall utility of APRI in the coinfected population.

Forns Index

The Forns index uses four common clinical/laboratory measurements: patient age, serum total cholesterol, serum γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and platelet count. This method can be used to differentiate patients with mild (F0-F1) fibrosis from those with severe (F2-F4) fibrosis (AUROC 0.81), but it is inaccurate in distinguishing between patients with grades F2-F4. The Forns index should not be used in patients with genotype 3, however, due to varying serum cholesterol levels. The Forns index has been validated in an HIV/HCV-infected cohort of 357 patients with a PPV of 94% for significant fibrosis, compared with 87% for APRI, and negative predictive value (NPV) 100% for cirrhosis.

Fibrosis 4 Score

Originally developed for use in HIV/HCV coinfection, FIB-4 also utilizes routine laboratory tests to differentiate Ishak fibrosis stages 0 to 3 (none to mild/moderate fibrosis) from stages 4 to 6 (advanced fibrosis). Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, a simple index was developed: (age [year] × AST [U/L]) / {(platelet count [10 9 /L]) × (ALT [U/L] × 1/2)}. With a cutoff in the validation set of less than 1.45, the NPV to exclude advanced fibrosis was 90% with a sensitivity of 70%, and a cutoff of greater than 3.25 yielded a PPV of 65% and a specificity of 97%. Use of this index would correctly classify 87% of patients with FIB-4 values outside 1.45 to 3.25 and avoid biopsy in 71% of the validation set with AUROC 0.765, sensitivity 70%, specificity 97% for differentiating Ishak 0 to 3 from Ishak 4 to 6.

Hospital Gregorio Maranon Indices

The HGM-1 index is based on platelet count, AST, and glucose and the HGM-2 index is based on platelet count, INR, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and AST. AUROCs of the HGM-1 index for the estimation group (EG) and the validation group (VG) to predict significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) and advanced fibrosis (F > 3) among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were 0.807 and 0.712, respectively. The AUROCs of the HGM-2 index for the EG and the VG were 0.844 and 0.815, respectively. The NPV for HGM-1 index in the VG to exclude F ≥ 2 was 54.5% and the PPV to confirm F > 2 was 93.3%. The NPV for HGM-2 index in the VG to exclude F ≥ 3 was 92.3%, and the PPV to confirm F > 3 was 64.3%. The HGM-3 was subsequently developed, which includes both routine and nonroutine tests including platelet count, ALP, hepatic growth factor, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP-1), and hyaluronic acid (HA). The AUROC of HGM-3 for identification of F ≥ 3 was 0.939, which was significantly higher than the AUROC for HGM-2, FIB-4, APRI, and Forns index.

Models Utilizing Assays Available in Specialized Labs

As noted with HGM-3, some noninvasive models have been developed for the evaluation of fibrosis in HCV and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients which include nonroutine measurements of extracellular matrix remodeling markers, such as amino-terminal propeptide of Type III collagen (PIIIP), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), TIMP, HA, and Type IV collagen (CL-4) alone or in combination with serum chemistries and serum HCV RNA levels.

The SHASTA index was developed to stage mild and advanced fibrosis in coinfected patients, incorporating hyaluronic acid, albumin, and AST. Fibrosis was evaluated against AST, ALT, serum albumin, total bilirubin, the chitinase-like protein YKL-40, and hyaluronic acid (HA). This study found that fibrosis scores of F3 or greater were found 27 times more often in patients with elevated HA levels (>86 ng/mL) and 5.5 times more often in patients with HA levels of 41 ng/mL to 86 ng/mL. Less substantial associations were detected when serum albumin was less than 3.5 g/dL (odds ratio [OR], 4.85), and serum AST was greater than 60 IU (OR, 5.91).

Myers et al. developed a noninvasive index which incorporated age, gender, alpha (2) microglobulin (A2M), haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1), and GGT. The main outcome measure was F2-F4 fibrosis by METAVIR scoring. The most useful markers, as determined by multivariate analysis, were A2M, Apo-A1, GGT, and gender. Using the five-marker index, the AUROC was 0.856 with a PPV of 86% for scores greater than 0.60 and a NPV of 93% for scores of 0.20 or less, with the conclusion that these thresholds could reduce the necessity for liver biopsy by 55% while maintaining an accuracy of 89%. TIMP-1 and HA have also been shown to accurately predict fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients by Larrousse et al. MMP-1, MMP-2, procollagen III N peptide (PIIINP), and HA were obtained in a cohort of 119 coinfected patients at the time of liver biopsy and prior to initiation of HCV antiviral therapy. On multivariate analysis, TIMP-1 and HA > 95 µg/dL were both shown to be independently associated with hepatic fibrosis. In discriminating mild (F0-F1) from significant (F2-F4) fibrosis, the AUROC was 0.84 using TIMP-1 and HA, with sensitivity of 72.9% and specificity of 83.1%.

Biomarkers have also been analyzed in a cohort of coinfected patients where 90% were currently treated with cART. HA and TGF-β1 levels were collected in 69 patients undergoing liver biopsy. AST, ALT, and GGT levels were also measured and were found to be elevated in 81%, 70%, and 60% of patients, respectively. Serum HA was shown to have a statistically significant correlation with fibrosis stage with an AUROC of 0.83 for the discrimination of mild (F0-F2) from advanced (F3-F4) fibrosis. Sensitivity and specificity for HA were 87% and 70%, respectively. TGF-β1, however, was not predictive of fibrosis in this cohort.

Noninvasive Fibrosis Assessment Using Elastography or Imaging Modalities

Several methods utilizing radiographic techniques for the noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis have also been evaluated in coinfected populations. These include both ultrasound and magnetic elastography and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). However, because there are limited data on magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and SPECT in those with HIV, these modalities will not be discussed.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here