Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
There are numerous causes of mandibular fractures including assault, motor vehicle accidents, projectile missiles, and pathologic fractures. Multiple studies have shown motor vehicle accidents and interpersonal assaults as the leading causes for mandibular fractures. When a mandible fracture is suspected, careful evaluation of other injuries must be ruled out. A recent study reported a 64.8% association with life-threatening injury such as closed head injury, skull fracture, and body cavity trauma. In the setting of isolated fractures to the maxillofacial skeleton, cervical spine injury ranged from 4.9% to 8.0%.
The mechanism of trauma can provide valuable information to the clinician on the potential injury patterns and locations to the mandible ( Fig. 185.1 ). An anterior impact typically causes a symphyseal fracture with or without condylar involvement, whereas lateral impacts typically result in body or angle fractures. Interpersonal assaults have a high predilection for mandibular angle fractures. The majority of mandibular fractures occur in males in the 25- to 34-year-old age group. Nearly 25% of mandible fractures in women are due to falls, and the practitioner should be wary of and evaluate for non-accidental trauma.
The classification of fractures by location can be further described by the fracture pattern as open (compound), closed (simple), comminuted, green stick, complex, and/or multiple. Open/compound fractures communicate through the skin or mucosa with the external environment. Comminuted fractures include multiple segments of bone that are crushed or splintered. Complex fractures are either an open or closed fracture that are associated with significant soft tissue injury.
Understanding the basic principles of dental occlusion is necessary to ensure optimal fracture repair.
Displacement of fracture segments is defined as either favorable (stable) or unfavorable (unstable) given the biomechanics exerted on the fragments by muscle pull ( Fig. 185.2 ).
Understanding the interaction of these forces is essential during reduction of fractures as excessive interfragmentary motion during fracture healing interrupts proper bone formation at the histologic level.
Temporary reduction of significantly displaced fracture segments that include the dentition can be achieved by placement of a bridal wire, which assists in control of flail segment(s) or hemorrhage ( Fig. 185.3 ).
Intubation is made challenging in cases of flail mandible fractures.
A prospective cohort study found that inferior alveolar nerve injury was four times more likely in posterior mandibular fractures (56.2%) than in anterior mandibular fractures.
A unilateral subcondylar fracture often presents with a contralateral open bite with deviation of the mandible to the ipsilateral side upon opening. Bilateral condylar fractures may present as an anterior open bite with premature contact of any posterior teeth.
In contrast to bicortical fractures, greenstick fractures of the mandible are often difficult to identify by physical exam ination alone. Careful history with focus on mechanism of injury and force of impact are critical for further workup and evaluation in those with a high suspicion for mandibular trauma.
In mandibular body fractures, masticatory forces create strain or tension above the mandibular canal. Below the canal, compression forces along the inferior border promote bony contact under an occlusal load. Fixation is necessary to neutralize this force.
Angle fractures are shown to have the highest rate of complication compared with other mandibular fractures partly due to its proximity to the inferior alveolar nerve and masseteric and facial vessels.
Regardless if a transoral or extraoral approach is used, rigid internal fixation for an angle fracture is necessary to neutralize the tension, compression, and torsional forces encountered at the angle due to the opposing forces of mandibular elevators and depressors in the region.
A third molar in the line of fracture may be left in place if it does not interfere with reduction, while its removal at time of repair has been shown to increase the risk of infection.
The marginal mandibular nerve and cervical nerve are 2 cm below the inferior border of the mandible 80% of the time.
Condylar fractures account for 11% to 16% of all facial fractures and nearly a third of mandibular fractures. Management of these fractures remains highly controversial; many surgeons favor nonsurgical treatment because it results in satisfactory function and esthetics.
Al-Moraissi and Ellis determined open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF) for subcondylar fractures provided superior functional clinical outcomes compared to maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) when considering maximal incisal opening, laterotrusive movement, protrusive movement, malocclusion, pain, and chin deviation.
Absolute indications for ORIF of condyle fractures: (1) displacement into the middle cranial fossa; (2) difficulty establishing dental occlusion with closed treatment alone; (3) lateral extracapsular displacement of the condyle; (4) presence of a foreign body; and (5) open fracture with potential for fibrosis
Coronoid fractures occur in less than 2% of all mandible fractures and are typically due to lateral impact at the level of the zygomatic-maxillary complex. Treatment for coronoid fracture is typically unnecessary.
Some have recommended that open treatment of atrophic mandible fractures be avoided due to the risk of compromised blood supply over the fracture.
Atrophic fractures can be classified by the following: Class I—15 to 20 mm of bone height; Class II—10 to 15 mm; and Class III—<10 mm of bone height.
More rigid fixation is necessary in mandibles with <15 mm of bone height. Fixation must be rigid enough to allow for load-bearing and ideally load-sharing under function.
When multiple mandible fractures exist, rigid fixation on at least one side is necessary to decrease the chance of a complication.
History of present illness
Determine patient’s level of consciousness and ability to communicate; may need to rely on family or friend(s) in the obtunded patient.
Inquire about pretrauma status of patient’s dentition/occlusion.
Determine level of pain and presence of trismus.
Investigate mechanism of trauma.
Past medical history
Cardiac disease
Pulmonary disease
Endocrine disorders (e.g., diabetes and adrenal disorders)
Coagulopathies
Immune disorders
Past surgical history
Previous facial/mandibular fracture repair; consider use of previous incisions
Be aware of extent of scar tissue from previous surgical procedures.
Medications
Anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents
Antihypertensive medications
Diabetic medications
Immune suppression medications
Antibiotics
Allergies
Social history
Tobacco history
Alcohol use/abuse
Illicit drug use/abuse
The evaluation of mandibular trauma begins with a systematic assessment and evaluation of the patient during the primary and secondary trauma surveys. Protection of the airway and cervical spine must be considered during every exam for mandibular trauma. Bilateral mandibular body or parasymphyseal fractures can cause a flail segment that is pulled back by the genial musculature resulting in airway restriction, making a typical chin lift or jaw thrust maneuver complicated.
Symmetry and height of lower third of face
Edema and ecchymosis overlying mandible or neck
Palpable step-offs at inferior border of mandible
Jaw opening pattern and maximum interincisal opening
Crepitus in anterior/lateral neck.
Lacerations (adjacent to critical structures—nerves, vessels) over mandible or neck
Soft tissue loss/avulsions
Foreign bodies, tooth fragments within soft tissue wounds
Altered sensation along distribution of trigeminal nerve (third division)
Integrity of mucosa
Edema or ecchymosis in vestibules/floor of mouth
Lacerations of mucosa, gingiva, or tongue
Missing/fractured teeth, particularly within adjacent lacerations
Occlusion
Range of motion of the mandible
Altered sensation of trigeminal nerve (third division)
Imaging is optimally obtained in at least two planes as single plane images may either prohibit a clinician from accurately identifying every fracture or underestimate the technical difficulty required for proper fracture reduction. Plain film radiography combinations that are used for mandibular fracture evaluation include a panoramic radiograph with a posterior-anterior radiograph of the mandible. A horizontally unfavorable fracture can be visualized on a panoramic radiograph, while a vertically unfavorable fracture can be determined on an anteroposterior radiograph.
Panorex—most diagnostic plain film image to diagnose mandibular fractures. Overlap of cervical spine may obstruct identification of posterior fractures.
PA skull radiograph—Evaluate symphyseal fractures.
Open mouth Townes—Evaluate subcondylar fractures.
Lateral oblique(s)—are useful for identifying mandibular body and angle fractures
Computed tomography (CT) scan—Multiple studies determined that a CT was 100% sensitive in diagnosing mandibular fractures compared to 86% sensitivity noted by panoramic radiograph.
3-dimensional images helpful in cases of severely comminuted mandible fractures or in conjunction with pan-facial fractures
Restore facial form and function.
Restore occlusion.
Restore mandibular range of motion.
Reduce fracture(s) to stop hemorrhage.
Neurologically unstable
Hemodynamically unstable
Acute infection
Surgical intervention for mandibular fractures should not be delayed to minimize the risk of postoperative infection, improve patient comfort, and facilitate oral nutrition. However, urgent surgical intervention may be delayed due to severe neurologic injuries, hemodynamic instability, or pre-existing unstable comorbidities. One study found no increase in complication rates when definitive repair was performed within three days compared with those after 3 days.
When teeth are present on only one side of the fracture, an open technique with rigid fixation is preferred. The requirement for either load-bearing or load-sharing fixation is dependent on the whether or not enough bone stock exists that can bear the load of mastication across the fracture site. Load-sharing fixation requires that the fragments transfer forces across the area, which can be accomplished with mini-plates, compression plates, or lag screws. Load-bearing fixation is a plate that must bear all forces and is used in area of severe comminution or continuity defects.
Multiple formal classification systems exist to describe occlusal relationships. The Angle system is most widely used.
In a normal Class I pattern, the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar is aligned with the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar.
In a Class II relationship, the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar is distal to the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar when in occlusion.
In a Class III pattern, the buccal groove of the mandibular first molar is mesial to the mesiobuccal cusp of the maxillary first molar when in occlusion.
Patients with a pre-existing malocclusion may have molar relationships that are normal in the anterior-posterior plane as described by the Angle system. However, discrepancies in the transverse plane may exist such as dental crowding, misalignment, or cross-bites.
Obtaining a photograph of the patient smiling before the injury assists the clinician in determining an optimal dental-occlusal relationship.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here