Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The best candidates for excimer laser phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) are eyes with anterior corneal pathology (top 10%−15%) and certain elevated lesions.
Eyes with recurrent erosions that do not respond to other treatments are also good candidates for PTK.
It is important to attempt to determine the depth of the corneal pathology preoperatively with a combination of slit lamp examination, pachymetry, and corneal imaging.
When the epithelium is smooth and regular, a transepithelial PTK is generally the best approach.
When the epithelium is very irregular, it should be removed mechanically prior to laser ablation.
The goal of PTK is typically a smoother, more regular cornea, but not necessarily crystal clarity. Deep ablations increase the risk of corneal haze/scar and excessive corneal flattening (and induced hyperopia).
Eyes requiring PTK are often at increased risk for poor healing. The patients should be followed closely after PTK to make sure the epithelium heals as expected.
Patients should be given appropriate expectations regarding the PTK procedure, postoperative management, and clinical outcomes, including the fact that many conditions treated with PTK (e.g., corneal dystrophies) will recur with time.
The excimer laser revolutionized corneal refractive surgery in the 1990s. Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995 and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) was FDA approved in 1998. While these procedures have helped millions of patients achieve improved uncorrected vision, they are not indicated for patients with abnormal corneas. The term phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) is applied when the excimer laser is used to treat corneal pathology. PTK was FDA approved in 1995.
The excimer laser uses 193 nm wavelength ultraviolet light to break molecular bonds in the cornea to remove corneal tissue in a process called “photoablative decomposition” or “photoablation.” Two significant benefits of this process are that: (1) tissue can be removed in an extremely accurate fashion, and (2) there is negligible collateral damage to adjacent tissue, resulting in minimal tissue healing response. For refractive purposes, the cornea can be reshaped to correct myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. For therapeutic purposes, corneal opacities and irregularities can be treated.
The primary advantage of PTK over lamellar keratectomy with a blade is the precision with which the excimer laser removes tissue. One laser pulse removes approximately 0.25 μm of tissue, or approximately 1/2000 of the corneal thickness. The shape of the laser spots can be adjusted from small circles to large circles (on the order of 0.6–6.5 mm diameter). Rectangular-shaped laser spots of similar dimensions can also be used. This precision allows the surgeon to remove superficial corneal abnormalities while leaving the remaining cornea clear and smooth.
A disadvantage of PTK is that it does not discriminate between abnormal and normal tissue. When the excimer laser is used to remove tissue, once it has ablated the pathologic cornea it continues to remove normal underlying tissue. Alternatively, superficial corneal tissue can be removed with a blade, a microkeratome, or a femtosecond laser. When lamellar keratectomy is performed with a blade, it is often possible to find a tissue plane between the abnormal and normal cornea, which can then be dissected, leaving normal tissue behind. However, if a smooth plane cannot be identified with a blade, this type of lamellar keratectomy generally creates a fairly irregular surface.
The principal advantage of PTK over lamellar keratectomy with a microkeratome or femtosecond laser is the control the physician has during the surgery. With a microkeratome, the depth plate is selected and a portion of superficial cornea is removed. With a femtosecond laser, the size, depth, and shape of the tissue removal are programmed at the beginning of the surgery. For these two procedures, the exact size and depth are then out of the surgeon’s control during the actual surgical procedure. Additionally, when a lamellar plane is removed from an irregular cornea with a microkeratome or femtosecond laser, the remaining surface will often also be irregular. Furthermore, the microkeratome and femtosecond laser generally cannot remove very thin sheets of corneal tissue.
Excimer laser PTK is used in the management of a large variety of anterior corneal pathology. In general, PTK can be used to treat two types of corneal abnormalities: opacities and irregularities. Needless to say, these two conditions often occur in the same eye.
FDA-approved indications for PTK include: (1) superficial corneal dystrophies (including granular, lattice, and Reis-Bücklers dystrophies [ ]), (2) epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (EBMD) and irregular corneal surfaces (e.g., secondary to Salzmann nodular degeneration, keratoconus nodules or other irregular surfaces), and (3) corneal scars and opacities (e.g., owing to trauma, surgery, infection, and degeneration). The laser should not remove greater than one-third of the corneal thickness and should leave at least 250 μm of tissue after the procedure.
Video 143.1 Transepithelial Phototherapeutic Keratectomy With an Antihyperopia Treatment for Reis-Bucklers Corneal Dystrophy. Christopher J. Rapuano.
Contraindications to PTK include an immunocompromised host, uncontrolled ocular disease such as uveitis, blepharitis or dry eyes, and any condition thought to adversely affect corneal healing. As with most contraindications, the patient and physician need to take any of these conditions into account and then decide whether the benefits outweigh the risks. Other contraindications are eyes with deep corneal pathology in which removal of greater than 20%–30% of the corneal thickness would be required to clear the bulk of the opacity. Similarly, eyes with areas of significant corneal thinning in the ablation zone are not good candidates for PTK owing to the fact that the ablation could weaken the cornea and predispose to irregular astigmatism or keratectasia. In these cases a lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty might be a better option.
As is true prior to most ocular surgeries, a complete history and ophthalmic examination should be performed before excimer laser PTK. One of the most important goals of the preoperative evaluation is to establish whether the patient is a good candidate for the PTK procedure. This includes determining whether the cornea is suitable for PTK, whether the eye is likely to heal well after PTK, and whether the patient’s goals will be achieved after PTK.
When the diagnosis is known (e.g., lattice dystrophy or a superficial nodule), it is important to find out from the patient what is bothering them. Is the problem recurrent painful episodes, poor vision, or contact lens intolerance? Does it occur occasionally, frequently, or constantly? Do glasses, contact lenses, or medications help? Only then will the surgeon begin to get an idea whether PTK is likely to benefit the patient. When the diagnosis is not as well defined (e.g., corneal scarring of unknown etiology), attempts to establish the diagnosis should be made. As an example, management and prognosis of a herpetic corneal scar is different from other corneal scars.
Ocular diagnoses and a history of previous surgery may be very important. PTK for a neurotrophic corneal scar, whether from herpes simplex, herpes zoster, or brain surgery, is not likely to heal as well as a nonneurotrophic scar. Additional medications such as an oral antiviral may be required. Prolonged use of a bandage soft contact lens (BSCL), placement of an amniotic membrane or even a lateral tarsorrhaphy may be required for the best result. PTK in a corneal graft can have similar healing problems or may stimulate an immune graft reaction.
Patients undergoing PTK are not the same population as those patients undergoing laser refractive surgery. PTK patients tend to be older and sicker. A medical history is important to determine whether there are any underlying systemic problems that may interfere with the surgery or the healing. Patients with collagen vascular disorders may have difficulty with healing of the corneal surface, and patients with immune deficiencies, whether from a systemic disease or systemic immunomodulating medications, may be at increased risk of infection.
A complete ophthalmologic examination should be performed. An important question to address is how much of the eye problem is caused by the cornea. If the cornea is scarred but the vision is poor due to severe glaucoma, then clearing the cornea will probably not improve the vision. Similarly, if there are EBMD changes but the patient’s pain is not consistent with recurrent erosions, treating the EBMD will probably not help. Distinguishing between poor vision from corneal opacity versus corneal irregularity is not always easy. Checking visual acuity with a hard contact lens overrefraction can help determine whether poor vision is due primarily to corneal irregularity or primarily to opacity. Evaluating the extent of the corneal abnormality with a slit lamp examination is a critical aspect of the examination. The size, depth, density, and location of the corneal pathology should be determined in addition to the corneal thickness in that area. If the corneal abnormality is thought to be causing a significant share of the problem, a second question to address is whether a PTK procedure is the best one to attempt to improve the situation. If more than 15%–20% of the cornea needs to be removed or if the residual corneal thickness after treatment will be below approximately 350 μm, the cornea is probably not a suitable candidate for PTK. A lamellar or penetrating keratoplasty might be a better option.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here