Energy devices in aesthetic surgery


Synopsis

  • Liposuction remains a staple of aesthetic body contouring. The introduction of new technology has allowed for improved outcomes with less invasive procedures.

  • While the introduction of energy-based skin tightening has improved patient outcomes, patient selection remains key to obtaining ideal results. In addition, managing expectations is important, as patients must be willing to accept a more modest result when compared to more aggressive excisional procedures.

  • A large variety of noninvasive body contouring technologies also exist. These modalities are largely targeted at fat reduction and include cryolipolysis, radiofrequency, and ultrasound-based approaches. Newer modalities also seek to improve muscle tone using high-frequency electromagnetic stimulation. A thorough discussion of these technologies is beyond the scope of this chapter.

Introduction

Traditionally, body contouring procedures were based on the excision of large amounts of excess skin and soft tissue. While certain patients, for example, those who have undergone post-bariatric massive weight loss, are still appropriate for this approach, many other patients are good candidates for less invasive methods. Liposuction remains a mainstay of aesthetic body contouring. However, liposuction procedures have traditionally been plagued by a number of limitations, including the inability to manage skin laxity. The introduction of energy-based devices to body contouring has helped to address some of these issues. Appropriate patient selection, awareness of expected outcomes, and an understanding of the mechanism of action of these devices are important for ideal patient outcomes.

Background

The tumescent technique in liposuction has optimized the outcomes and safety profile of liposuction procedures and is considered the gold standard in body contouring procedures. Additional refinement such as the development of cannulas specific to body sites and the use of manual syringe suction for fat grafting and fine contouring have led to further improvement of liposuction techniques. Furthermore, outcomes have been optimized. The introduction of energy-based modalities such as laser-assisted liposuction (LAL) and ultrasound-­assisted liposuction (UAL) are useful adjuncts, reducing surgery time, operator fatigue, patient recovery time, and postoperative pain.

Ultrasound-assisted liposuction

The introduction of ultrasound to the field of body contouring surgery occurred in the late 1980s and was introduced to the US in 1993. In 2001, the third-generation VASER system (Sound Surgical Technologies, Louisville, CO) was introduced, and it is currently the most commonly used ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) technology.

There are three basic mechanisms by which ultrasound interacts with tissue: thermal, mechanical, and cavitation. The thermal effect is produced by heat generated from the rapidly vibrating ultrasonic probe. The mechanical effect is created when the rapidly vibrating tip of the ultrasonic probe contacts tissue. Cavitation is the tissue interaction largely responsible for the fat emulsification that occurs with current UAL devices. Following dispersion of the wetting solution, microbubbles are lodged within the fat tissue matrix. With the application of ultrasound, these microbubbles implode and collapse. Fat cells are then separated within the fat tissue matrix, which then mix vigorously with the tumescent solution by acoustic streaming to create an emulsion. This emulsion is subsequently aspirated with a suction cannula.

Historical perspective

Two Italian gynecologists, Arpad and Giorgio Fischer, created a blunt tunneling method for the removal of fat. However, liposuction was popularized by the French surgeon Dr. Yves-Gerard Illouz in 1982.

The “Illouz method” featured a technique of suction-­assisted lipectomy after tumescing or infusing fluid into tissues using blunt cannulas and high-vacuum suction and demonstrated both reproducible good results and low morbidity. Pierre Fournier, another French surgeon, used lidocaine as local anesthetic, modified the incision technique, and began to use compression after the operation. Liposuction began in the United States in the mid to late 1980s and was frequently done under sedation rather than general anesthesia. Concerns over the high volume of fluid and potential toxicity of lidocaine with tumescent techniques eventually led to the concept of lower-volume “super wet” tumescence.

The Italians were the first to experiment with using ultrasound to emulsify fat. Ultrasonic energy was initially applied to the field of body contouring surgery in the late 1980s by Scuderi. It was later popularized by Zocchi, who introduced the technique to the US in 1993.

Preoperative preparation

Preoperative markings are made with the patient in the standing position. As in traditional liposuction, there are five distinct anatomical zones that should be avoided in UAL. These areas are the “zones of adherence” and include the gluteal crease, the lower lateral thigh area of the iliotibial tract, the posterior distal thigh above the popliteal crease, mid-medial thigh area, and the area of the lateral gluteal depression. Contour deformities frequently result following attempts to treat these areas. Careful planning of skin incisions is important prior to the procedure because UAL requires a greater number of slightly longer access incisions to accommodate the skin protectors. Furthermore, carefully planned incisions avoid torque on the ultrasonic probe, particularly over curved anatomical areas.

The characteristics of localized fat in the area to be treated must be considered when selecting the appropriate VASER probe. Fat cells differ in various regions of the body with respect to collagen structure and septi among the fat cells, as described by de Souza Pinto. In order to achieve the best outcome, knowledge of these differences is essential.

Tissue penetration is influenced by the diameter of the probe, as well as the number of rings at the tip of the probe. A probe of a given diameter with more rings will emulsify fat tissue more efficiently than one with fewer rings. However, a probe with more rings will not penetrate fibrous tissues as easily due to vibratory energy that is dispersed to the sides of the probe as opposed to the front surface. In general, fibrous tissues are better addressed with probes with fewer rings as the energy is more concentrated. Furthermore, when addressing fibrous tissue, smaller-diameter probes penetrate the tissue more easily. The 3.7 mm probes can achieve efficient debulking and contouring of medium to large volumes of soft to fibrous tissues. The number of rings at the tip of the probe should correspond to the fibrous nature of the tissue. Fine contouring of smaller, soft to extremely fibrous localized fat deposits is achieved with 2.9 mm probes.

As a general rule, continuous mode is frequently used for fibrous tissue, faster fragmentation, and, in instances where tissue emulsification is not readily achieved, in the pulsed VASER mode. VASER mode is typically suited for finer, more delicate sculpting or softer tissues. Smooth movement of the probe through tissues is ideal, and settings must be adjusted in order to achieve this end.

Application times have been delineated through practice and experience. Generally, 1 min of application time in VASER or continuous mode can be applied for every 100 mL of infused wetting solution. The surgical endpoint is loss of resistance to probe movement in all intended areas. Aspiration can then be performed with suction-assisted or power-assisted liposuction.

In the past, there has been concern that ultrasound emulsified adipose tissue would be inappropriate for fat grafting as it could affect cell viability. However, the third-generation VASER system has been proven to be produce highly viable adipose tissue for grafting in both laboratory and clinical evaluations.

Surgical technique

General endotracheal anesthesia is preferable, particularly if prone positioning is required, as well as for large-volume aspirations. The back, flanks, lateral thighs, and superior posterior thighs are easily accessed in the prone position. Many surgeons also prefer the lateral decubitus position. Despite the fact that additional repositioning is required, some surgeons maintain that the lateral decubitus position offers better access and facilitates large-volume evacuations from the flanks and back in order to achieve more aesthetic waistlines. To access the abdomen, anterior and medial thighs, knees, calves, arms, ankles, breasts, and face, the supine position is used.

Core body temperature maintenance is essential and is accomplished by infusing warmed intravenous (IV) fluids as well as the use of forced warm air with a Bair Hugger (Arizent Inc., Eden Prairie, MN). The access incisions are made using a No. 11 blade and must accommodate the fluid-infiltrating cannula. In general, the wetting solution is prepared with 1 mL of epinephrine added to a 1 L bag of Ringer's lactate at room temperature (1 : 1,000,000 dilution). Lidocaine may be added to the wetting solution for an additional local anesthetic effect. Lidocaine dosing should typically not exceed 35 mg/kg, although some authors routinely use doses exceeding 50 mg/kg while maintaining a safety margin. Tranexamic acid can also be given intravenously or added to the wetting solution for additional hemostatic effects.

Wetting solution is first infused using a fine cannula or can also be accomplished with a power-assisted basket cannula. Then, for most areas of the body, pretreatment is completed with a 3.7 mm two-ring probe set to continuous mode at 80% power. We have found this to be safe in most regions when applied for approximately 1 minute per 100 mL of infused wetting solution. The endpoint of treatment should be a loss of resistance to passage of the cannula. For areas with more fibrous tissue (including gynecomastia), we would recommend using a one-ring probe as the energy is more concentrated and allows for easier penetration of these tissues. For thinner or smaller areas, the 2.9 mm diameter probe can also be used. The emulsified fat can then be aspirated with either standard suction or power-assisted liposuction cannulas. All treated areas should be checked for evenness of resection and can be equalized using a basket cannula without suction.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here