Introduction

Although the provision of dialysis and the need for a kidney transplant during infancy is rare, medical advancements have led to increased availability and efficacy of these treatments when needed worldwide. Data from the US Renal Data System (USRDS) show that the overall incidence of pediatric end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis or transplantation has decreased slightly from 12 cases per million people in 2009 to 11 cases per million people in 2019. Despite this decrease, the <1-year-old age group remains the highest pediatric incidence group with an adjusted ESKD incidence rate of 27 cases per million people in 2019. As more medically complex infants with severe kidney disorders are surviving with the help of prenatal diagnoses, in utero interventions, and multidisciplinary maternal fetal medicine teams with detailed postnatal plans for treatment, it is not surprising that a growing number of these infants will require dialysis and kidney transplantation in the future. With the need for optimal management strategies for these infants, novel treatment regimens and the introduction of new technology have been incorporated as part of complex patient care with a goal of reducing overall morbidity and mortality. Despite these improvements, there continues to be a higher morbidity and mortality rate in infants compared to older children with ESKD, reinforcing the need for continued improvement in therapies associated with the care of infants with acute and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Indications for kidney replacement therapy

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) encompasses treatment with any dialysis modality including peritoneal dialysis (PD), hemodialysis (HD), or continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). Both PD and HD can be used for the management of either acute kidney injury (AKI) or ESKD, whereas CKRT is reserved for intensive care unit (ICU) care. The specific dialysis modality chosen for treatment is typically based on the underlying condition and characteristics of the patient such as size, comorbidities, and overall hemodynamic stability, in addition to the resources and expertise available at the treating institution.

Kidney replacement therapy for the management of acute kidney injury

AKI occurs in up to 25% of all neonatal and pediatric ICU admissions and is associated with elevated rates of morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for the development of AKI in neonates and infants include immature development of the kidneys combined with exposure to nephrotoxic medications, renal hypoperfusion related to sepsis or hypovolemia, or direct injury to the kidneys from infection, a hypoxic event, or thrombosis. Special populations including very low birth weight infants and those requiring cardiopulmonary bypass or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have also been shown to be at higher risk for the development of AKI.

The initial treatment of AKI consists of medical management with a focus on supportive therapy and resolution of the inciting event. For sequela of AKI unresponsive to medical management, such as electrolyte disturbances (hyperkalemia, acidosis), fluid overload and the associated cardiovascular manifestations, or an inability to provide full nutrition, KRT is indicated. , Another indication for KRT is an infant born with an inborn error of metabolism leading to hyperammonemia. Elevated ammonia levels (>200 μmol/L) are neurotoxic and associated with poor neurocognitive outcomes, whereas rising levels (>800 μmol/L) can lead to cerebral edema and death. Acute management of hyperammonemia, for which consensus guidelines have been published, includes cessation of protein intake and introduction of intravenous glucose and lipids for neonates with ammonia levels that are elevated for age. Initiation of a nitrogen scavenger medication is indicated for ammonia levels > 150 μmol/L or rapidly rising levels or for neonates with neurologic sequela. For neonates with ammonia levels > 400 μmol/L, levels < 400 μmol/L but not responding to medical therapies, or with clinical concern for the development of neurologic involvement, rapid reduction with the use of KRT is necessary to prevent neurologic damage. Ammonia levels should be reduced to <200 μmol/L with the use of KRT prior to discontinuation of the treatment. Close monitoring for rebound hyperammonemia is essential, especially when using HD. Ammonia is a small, non-protein-bound molecule (17 Da) that is readily removed with KRT. Depending on the patient characteristics and the resources available at the treating facility, treatment may be initiated with HD followed by continuous clearance with CKRT if needed, or CKRT can be used preferentially to effectively decrease ammonia levels. In centers where extracorporeal KRT is not available, PD should be used initially to decrease ammonia levels, with consideration for transfer to a center with HD or CKRT if levels are not decreasing rapidly. ,

Kidney replacement therapy for the management of chronic kidney disease

The main etiology resulting in ESKD in children < 1 year of age is congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract (CAKUT), which makes up approximately 55% of all infantile ESKD diagnoses. This includes infants with obstructive uropathy (e.g., posterior urethral valves), renal dysplasia or hypoplasia, and reflux nephropathy. The second most common etiology consists of cystic or genetic diseases such as congenital nephrotic syndrome and autosomal dominant or recessive polycystic kidney disease. Indications for the provision of KRT for management of CKD/ESKD are similar to those for AKI and include the inability to medically manage fluid balance and nutritional status, as well as treatment resistant electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities.

Ethical considerations for kidney replacement therapy in infants with chronic kidney disease

Despite continued improvements in dialysis equipment and overall morbidity and mortality in infants with ESKD, there are several ethical dilemmas to consider in this population. Chronic dialysis during infancy, regardless of the modality, is associated with a significant burden on the family (e.g., parents) related to increased mental stress, financial needs, and time requirements. Parents are expected to give multiple medications several times per day, keep track of vital signs such as weight and blood pressure, and either conduct nightly PD at home or travel to the dialysis unit 3–6 times per week for their child to receive a 3- to 4-hour HD session. Not only are the patient and parents affected by the burdens of dialysis, but siblings are also often impacted by the necessity for so much parental attention being directed to the ill child.

For infants with multiple comorbidities, especially severe neurologic disorders, it is important to discuss the parents’ wishes for overall quality of life for their child. Establishing goals for quality of life can help guide treatment options, such as chronic dialysis, and determine if and when these treatments become futile. Honest conversations regarding daily life with chronic dialysis and transplant, along with potential complications, is also imperative. For infants on chronic dialysis, life is often complicated by frequent hospital visits, repeated blood draws, dialysis complications and infections, and frequent nutrition assessments with formula modifications. Developmental delay is common for infants on chronic dialysis due to many factors including long hospitalizations, suboptimal nutrition, and the uremic milieu, which generally requires the support of physical, occupational, and speech therapy. Even after kidney transplantation, children require frequent clinic visits, blood draws, a variety of daily medications, multiple kidney transplants and/or additional courses of dialysis in the future.

Due to the complexities that often exist, not only is making decisions regarding initiation of chronic dialysis in infants difficult for the family, but it can also be challenging for the medical team. A survey completed in 2011 found that only 30% of nephrologists would always offer KRT to neonates < 1 month of age and that the majority of medical providers would consider parental refusal of dialysis as an acceptable alternative during the neonatal period. This is especially true in the setting of significant comorbidities and emphasizes the need for detailed discussions between the health-care providers and family members regarding the benefits and risks of long-term KRT.

In many cases, the prenatal diagnosis of congenital kidney anomalies such as CAKUT or other significant genetic or cystic renal disorders is made following a prenatal ultrasound. Although the findings are most often distressing to the family, early detection allows for an in-depth discussion of the possible clinical course, treatment plans, and likely outcomes between the family and a multidisciplinary medical team (e.g., neonatologist, nephrologist, social worker, ethicist) before the baby is born. Despite differing ethical opinions that may arise pertaining to the provision of chronic dialysis to neonates and young infants with ESKD, the necessity for these initial and reoccurring multidisciplinary meetings with families is undisputed by pediatric kidney groups worldwide. Through the use of frequent communication and full discussion of current clinical status, prognosis, and treatment options, families can feel supported and informed as they are called upon to make lifelong decisions on behalf of their child.

Dialysis modalities

Continuous kidney replacement therapy

CKRT is a 24-hour continuous extracorporeal form of dialysis utilized in ICUs for infants and children who may be hemodynamically unstable or who may require an extracorporeal dialysis therapy for other reasons (e.g., recent abdominal surgery, omphalocele). With this modality, a CKRT machine is set up at the patient’s bedside and can be connected to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit or directly to the patient through a double-lumen HD catheter. The CKRT machine pulls blood from the patient at a slow, constant rate, which decreases the risk of hypotension that can occur secondary to abrupt or large fluid shifts with HD. The blood is then run through a filter for removal of fluid and solute (e.g., potassium, urea, phosphorus) via diffusion and/or convection, based on one of three types of CKRT prescriptions, and returned back to the patient. Continuous venovenous hemofiltration utilizes convection to clear solute without the use of dialysis fluid. Continuous venovenous hemodialysis incorporates the use of dialysis fluid to clear solute via diffusion, whereas continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration combines the two methods to use both diffusion and convection ( Fig. 12.1 ). Diffusion is the movement of small to intermediate molecular weight molecules across a semipermeable membrane from an area of higher concentration to lower concentration. Convection is the mass movement of solute that accompanies fluid across a semipermeable membrane (termed solvent drag) from an area of high pressure to low pressure. More intermediate and large molecular weight molecules can be cleared with convection compared with diffusion ( Fig. 12.2 ). In all types of CKRT, fluid removal (termed ultrafiltration) can be managed precisely by the medical team for gradual alterations in fluid balance to maintain cardiovascular stability and adequacy of nutritional support. CKRT is utilized for management of AKI until signs of kidney recovery are present or in patients with ESKD as a bridge to long-term dialysis with either HD or PD. ,

Fig. 12.1, CKRT diagram and clearance choices.

Fig. 12.2, Diffusive and convective clearance.

Despite the benefits, there are several disadvantages of CKRT. Clearance is nonselective; therefore, beneficial electrolytes and nutrients accompany the waste products that are removed throughout the treatment. Although this is the case for all dialysis modalities, the impact is more significant with CKRT as a result of the continuous nature of the therapy, leading to potential difficulties with nutrition and bone and mineral management. Typically, protein, electrolyte, and vitamin (B 1 , B 6 , B 9 , C) supplementation is required along with close monitoring of trace elements. When not optimally managed, the protein-energy wasting related to CKRT can lead to poor weight gain and ultimately malnutrition, which in turn has been associated with higher mortality rates than what is experienced by those with an ideal body weight. , Ideally, CKRT should be used for a short duration to prevent excessive removal of these products, with special care taken in the design of the nutrition plan for each patient to ensure that the appropriate replacement nutrients are provided.

Other disadvantages of CKRT include the need for central venous access and anticoagulation. An effective central venous access that facilitates the performance of dialysis can be difficult to obtain and maintain in infants due to their small vessel size. It may result in long-term vascular injury and requires close monitoring for signs of infection or thrombosis. The therapy is time intensive and requires specially trained nurses, generally in a one-to-one patient-to-nurse ratio. To prevent blood clotting in the CKRT circuit during treatment, anticoagulation is generally required (except in the case of infants with substantial alterations of their coagulation status) and can lead to hematologic complications. A commonly used anticoagulation regimen consists of regional citrate and calcium, which has the advantage of acting locally only in the CKRT circuit but cannot be used in certain circumstances (e.g., infants with liver failure). Alternatives include systemic anticoagulation with continuous heparin or bivalirudin, therapies that may be associated with an increased risk for bleeding in critically ill infants. Initiation of CKRT can also precipitate hypotension or a bradykinin release syndrome, which is associated with certain filter membranes and can lead to tachycardia, hypotension, anaphylaxis, and possible death. Strategies to decrease the risk for these potential complications have been published.

Lastly, despite the frequent off-label use of CKRT in infants and young children, the current CKRT machines in the United States are only approved by the Food and Drug Administration for pediatric patients ≥ 20 kg. The majority of the CKRT circuit volumes far exceed 10% of the total blood volume for infants and require a blood prime to be used during the initiation of each CKRT circuit to prevent hemodynamic instability. Smaller filters are now available for children 8–20 kg in weight (HF20 filter), which decreases the need for a blood prime in some, but not all, infants. Newer technology has, thankfully, resulted in the development of three small but highly effective extracorporeal volume CKRT machines made specifically for neonates and infants. The Cardiac and Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Circuit (CARPEDIEM), Newcastle Infant Dialysis Ultrafiltration System (NIDUS), and the Aquadex dialysis machine all significantly decrease the need for blood product exposure in small infants. , ,

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here