Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The untoward consequences of sexual activity, including unintended pregnancy (see Chapter 144 ) and sexually transmitted infections (STIs; Chapter 146 ), are experienced by adolescents at unacceptably high rates. Adolescents often do not seek reproductive healthcare until 6-12 mo after initiating sex; many will become pregnant and/or acquire an STI during this interval. Early and appropriate counseling and educational interventions with adolescents, including direct discussion of unwanted pregnancy and STI prevention, can decrease risky sexual behavior; adolescents who plan sexual initiation are 75% more likely to use contraception at sexual debut. Therefore, appropriate counseling and provision of contraception as warranted are a critical component in comprehensive healthcare for adolescents.
To decrease rates of unintended pregnancy, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommend adolescents use the most effective forms of reversible contraception. Comparing typical effectiveness of contraceptive methods the chart illustrates a tiered system of contraceptive methods ranging from more effective to less effective methods ( Fig. 143.1 ). These tiers are categorized by typical-use failure rates , which reflect the effectiveness of a method for the average person who may not consistently use the method or may not always use the method correctly ( Table 143.1 ). For example, for oral contraceptive pills, the typical-use failure rate is 7%, whereas the perfect-use failure rate is <1%. Tier 1 methods, the most effective, include those with failure rates of <1 pregnancy per 100 women in a year of typical use, and reversible Tier 1 methods include intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants. Tier 2 methods have failure rates of 4-7 pregnancies per 100 women in a year of typical use and include injectable contraception, oral contraceptive pills, contraceptive patch, and vaginal ring. Tier 3 methods have failure rates of >13 pregnancies per 100 women per year of typical use and include the male and female condom, the diaphragm, withdrawal, the sponge, fertility awareness–based methods, and spermicides.
METHOD | FAILURE RATE * | SOME ADVANTAGES | SOME ADVERSE EFFECTS AND DISADVANTAGES | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Typical Use | Perfect Use | |||
Implant | Convenience; long-term contraception; no patient compliance required; rapid return of fertility after removal | Irregular bleeding; removal complications | ||
Nexplanon | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
Intrauterine devices (lUDs) | Convenience; long-term contraception; no patient compliance required; rapid return of fertility after removal | Rare uterine perforation; risk of infection with insertion; anemia | ||
ParaGard T380A | 0.8% | 0.6% | Effective for 10 yr; nonhormonal | Irregular/heavy bleeding and dysmenorrhea |
Mirena | 0.1% | 0.1% | Decreased menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrheal | Irregular bleeding in 1st 3-6 mo, followed by amenorrhea; ovarian cysts |
Liletta | 0.1% | 0.1% | Decreased menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrheal | Irregular bleeding in 1st 3-6 mo; ovarian cysts |
Kyleena | 0.2% | 0.2% | Smaller T-frame and narrower insertion tube | Irregular bleeding in 1st 3-6 mo; ovarian cysts; amenorrhea in 13% of users after 1 yr |
Skyla | 0.4% | 0.3% | Smaller T -frame and narrower insertion tube | Irregular bleeding in 1st 3-6 mo; ovarian cysts; amenorrhea in only 6% of users after 1 yr |
Sterilization | ||||
Female | 0.5% | 0.5% | Long-term contraception; no patient compliance required | Potential for surgical complications; regret among young women; reversal often not possible and expensive |
Male | 0.15% | 0.1% | Long-term contraception; no patient compliance required | Pain at surgical site, regret among young men; reversal often not possible and expensive |
Injectable | Convenience; same as progestin-only oral contraceptives | Delayed return to fertility, irregular bleeding and amenorrhea; weight gain; may decrease bone mineral density | ||
Depo-Provera | 4% | 0.2% | ||
Combination oral contraceptives | 7% | 0.3% | Protection against ovarian and endometrial cancer, PID, and dysmenorrhea | Increased rate of thromboembolism, stroke, and myocardial infarction in older smokers; nausea; headache; contraindicated with breastfeeding |
Progestin-only oral contraceptives | 7% | 0.3% | Protection against PID. iron-deficiency anemia, and dysmenorrhea; safe in breastfeeding women and those with cardiovascular risk | Irregular, unpredictable bleeding; must take at same time every day |
Transdermal | Convenience of once-weekly application; same benefits as combination oral contraceptives | Dysmenorrhea and breast discomfort may be more frequent than with oral contraceptives; application site reactions; detachment; increased estrogen exposure compared to oral contraceptives | ||
Evra | 7% | 0.3% | ||
Vaginal | Excellent cycle control; rapid return to fertility after removal; convenience of once-monthly insertion | Discomfort; vaginal discharge | ||
NuvaRing | 7% | 0.3% | ||
Diaphragm with spermicide | 17% | 16% | Low cost; may reduce risk of cervical cancer | High failure rate; cervical irritation; increased risk of urinary tract infection and toxic shock syndrome; some require fitting by healthcare professional; may be difficult to obtain; available only by prescription |
Condom without spermicide | ||||
Female | 21% | 5% | Protection against STIs; covers external genitalia; OTC | High failure rate; difficult to insert; poor acceptability |
Male | 13% | 2% | Protection against STIs, OTC | High failure rate; allergic reactions; poor acceptability; breakage possible |
Withdrawal | 20% | 4% | No drugs or devices | High failure rate |
Sponge | 14-27% | 9-20% | OTC; low cost; no fitting required; provides 24 hr of protection | High failure rate; contraindicated during menses; increased risk of toxic shock syndrome |
Fertility awareness–based methods | 15% | - | Low cost; no drugs or devices | High failure rate; may be difficult to learn; requires relatively long periods of abstinence |
Standard Days method | 12% | 5% | ||
TwoDay method | 14% | 4% | ||
Ovulation method | 23% | 3% | ||
Symptothermal method | 2% | 0.4% | ||
Spermicide alone | 21% | 16% | OTC | High failure rate; local irritation; must be reapplied with repeat intercourse; increased risk of HIV transmission |
No method | 85% | 85% | - | – |
* Risk of unintended pregnancy during first year of use; data from Trussel J, et al: In Hatcher RA et al: Contraceptive technology. ed 21, New York, 2018, Ayer Company Publishers.
sexual activity
sexual debut
According to the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System 2015, 41.2% of U.S. high school students had ever had sexual intercourse and approximately one-third reported being currently sexually active.
Although U.S. teens and European teens have similar levels of sexual activity and ages of sexual debut , U.S. teens are less likely to use contraception and less likely to use the most effective methods. Teen pregnancy rates have been declining worldwide as a result of delayed initiation of sexual activity and increased contraceptive use. Despite declines, the United States still had the highest 2013 teen birthrate in the Western industrialized world, with 26.5 live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19 yr ( Fig. 143.2 ). This is almost 1.5 times higher than the 2013 teen birthrate in the United Kingdom, which has the highest rate in Western Europe, and almost 8 times higher than the teen birthrate in Switzerland, which has the lowest rate in Western Europe. In 2011, of the 574,000 teen pregnancies in the United States, 75% were unintended, indicating an unmet need for reliable, effective contraception that teens will correctly and consistently use.
According to the National Survey of Family Growth, 2011–2013, virtually all sexually experienced teens have used some method of contraception in the past. The most commonly used method by teenage females is the condom , followed by withdrawal (both least effective methods) and then the pill (a moderately effective method). IUDs and implants, the most effective reversible methods, are only used by 4.3% of female contraceptive users age 15-19 yr. Use of contraception at first sex has greatly increased over the last 50 yr. As of 2010, the condom is the most common method used at first sex, reported by >75% of males and females. Factors associated with contraception use at first sex include increasing age among teens up to age 17 yr; time spent in college; and planning their sexual debut.
More than half of sexually experienced female teens are currently using the most effective reversible contraceptives or moderately effective contraceptive methods. U.S. teens' use of hormonal methods at last intercourse is less frequent compared to teens in other developed countries: 52% of U.S. teens, 56% of Swedish 18-19 yr olds, 67% of French 15-19 yr olds, 72% of British 16-19 yr olds, and 73% of Canadian 15-19 yr olds use hormonal methods. A higher likelihood of female current contraceptive use is associated with older age at sexual initiation, aspirations for higher academic achievement, acceptance of one's own sexual activity, and a positive attitude toward contraception. Despite the importance of dual protection to protect against both unwanted pregnancy and STIs, only 21.3% of sexually active female U.S. teens are using condoms in addition to another, more effective contraceptive method.
counseling
effectiveness
typical-use failure rates
confidentiality
teen-friendly
The health screening interview during the adolescent preventive visit offers opportunities to identify and discuss unsafe sexual practices among all adolescents and to identify and reinforce safe sexual behaviors, including abstinence (see Chapter 137 ). Adolescents with medical conditions, either chronic or acute, are particularly vulnerable to having sexual and reproductive health omitted from their visits, although they have similar sexual health and contraceptive needs as healthy adolescents (see Chapter 734 ). Their comorbidities or concurrent medication use may make unintended pregnancy an increased health risk and may also reduce contraceptive options. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use outlines medical conditions associated with increased risk for adverse health events as a result of pregnancy and also provides recommendations for who can safely use specific contraceptive methods.
The goals of counseling with adolescents are to (1) understand adolescent experiences, preferences, perceptions, and misperceptions about pregnancy and use of contraceptives; (2) help adolescents put unprotected intercourse risk in a personal perspective; (3) educate adolescents about the various methods available using information that is medically accurate, balanced, and provided in a nonjudgmental manner; and (4) help adolescents choose a safe and effective method that can either be provided on site or be easily obtained through prescription or by referral. Counseling should include a review of all contraceptive methods available that the adolescent can use safely (see U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria), starting with the most effective methods. Long-acting reversible contraception (IUDs and implants) is a safe and effective option for many adolescents, including those who have not been pregnant or given birth. The adolescent should be counseled about method effectiveness using typical-use failure rates. It is important to ask about use of withdrawal because 60% of female teens have used it for contraception and it has a typical-use failure rate of 20%. Abstinence should also be discussed as an option even if teens have engaged in sexual intercourse in the past. Situational abstinence may be the best option if they do not have another method available at a particular time.
Necessary concepts to address while discussing individual methods include how effective the method is, how long the method works, what behaviors are required for correct and consistent use, what side effects may be seen, any noncontraceptive benefits of the method (e.g., reduced menstrual bleeding, protection from STIs), and what signs or symptoms of complications should prompt a return visit. Reviewing common side effects allows teens to anticipate and cope with any changes with reassurance and may avoid method discontinuation. Weighing the possibility of certain side effects with the possibility of an unintended pregnancy may also help with the conversation. It is also important to address any specific misperceptions teens may have for certain contraceptives regarding side effects, effectiveness, or any other concept discussed.
Once an adolescent chooses a method, the provider and adolescent should discuss clear plans on correct and consistent use of the chosen method and strategies for appropriate follow-up ( Table 143.1 ). Providers should help the adolescent consider potential barriers to correct and consistent use (e.g., forgetting to take a pill daily) and develop strategies to deal with each barrier (e.g., use of reminder systems such as daily text messages or phone alarms). The provider should assess whether the teen understood the information discussed and may confirm by asking the teen to repeat back key concepts.
The U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use provides guidance for providers regarding when to start contraception, how to be certain the woman is not pregnant at contraception initiation, and what examinations and tests are recommended before initiating contraception. Generally, women may start a contraceptive method other than an IUD at any time, and an IUD may be placed when a provider is reasonably certain that a woman is not pregnant. Most women do not require any exams or tests before initiating contraception. A pelvic examination is only required for placement of an IUD, unless otherwise indicated. STI screening is appropriate at IUD placement once sexual activity has begun, but most women do not require additional screening if they have been recently screened according to CDC sexually transmitted disease (STD) treatment guidelines. Gonorrhea and chlamydia screening using a self- or provider-collected vaginal swab or urine sample is recommended unless symptoms require a pelvic exam. IUD placement should not be delayed to receive screening results. ACOG guidelines recommend that the female teen should first visit a gynecologist between age 13 and 15 yr, unless necessary at an earlier age. This visit aims to establish rapport, educate the patient and parents or guardian on healthy sexual development, and provide routine preventive services. Cervical cancer screening is not recommended until age 21.
Providers should offer confidential services to adolescents and observe all relevant state laws and legal obligations (e.g., notification or reporting of sexual abuse). Chapter 137 discusses confidentiality and consent issues related to contraceptive management. Providers should also encourage adolescents to involve parents or guardians in their healthcare decisions, while giving parents clear information on their teen's right to confidentiality, privacy, and informed consent. All services should be provided in a youth-friendly manner, meaning that they are accessible, equitable, acceptable, appropriate, comprehensive, effective, and efficient. Resources are available that describe ways to ensure a teen-friendly reproductive health visit.
LARC
intrauterine devices
implants
Long-acting reversible contraception ( LARC ) includes 4 levonorgestrel (LNG) IUDs, the copper (Cu) IUD, and the etonogestrel subdermal implant. LARC methods are the only Tier 1 methods that are reversible (see Fig. 143.1 ). Considered “forgettable” contraception, LARC does not require frequent office or pharmacy visits and does not depend on user compliance for effectiveness. In the Contraceptive CHOICE Project in St. Louis, MO, >9,000 women were given the contraceptive method of their choice at no cost and were followed for 2-3 yr. The failure rates among women who used oral contraceptive pills, transdermal patch, or vaginal ring were >20 times higher than the failure rates for women using a LARC method. Acceptance, continuation, and satisfaction in this project were also higher among adolescents using LARC compared with adolescents using non-LARC methods. ACOG and AAP support the use of LARC methods for adolescents. The U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria supports safe use of both IUDs and implants for adolescents and nulliparous women. Implants are considered category 1 for all ages, and IUDs are considered category 2 for women <20 yr old and for nulliparous women ( Table 143.2 ).
Category 1 : A condition for which there is no restriction for the use of the contraceptive method.
Category 2 : A condition for which the advantages of using the method generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risks.
Category 3 : A condition for which the theoretical or proven risks usually outweigh the advantages of using the method.
Category 4 : A condition that represents an unacceptable health risk if the contraceptive method is used.
IUDs are small, flexible, plastic objects introduced into the uterine cavity through the cervix. They differ in size, shape, and the presence or absence of pharmacologically active substances. In the United States, 5 IUDs are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA): the CuT380A (Paragard) and 4 LNG IUDs (Liletta, Kyleena, Mirena, and Skyla). The effectiveness of the Cu IUD is enhanced by the copper ions released into the uterine cavity, with possible mechanisms including inhibition of sperm transport and prevention of implantation; this IUD is effective for at least 10 yr.
The LNG IUDs also have various actions, from thickening of cervical mucus and inhibiting sperm survival to suppressing the endometrium. LNG IUDs are effective for at least 3 and 5 years. All IUDs have typical-use failure rates of <1% (see Fig. 143.1 ).
Common misconceptions of IUDs among healthcare providers are that IUDs cause infections, infertility, and generally are not safe for teens or nulliparous women to use; these misconceptions are a barrier to teens accessing these highly effective and acceptable methods. IUDs do not increase risk of infertility and may be inserted safely in teens as well as nulliparous women (category 2; see Table 143.2 ).
Although early studies suggested an increased risk for upper genital tract infection, theoretically as a result of passing a foreign body through the cervix, newer work has refuted these earlier concerns. Therefore, clinicians are encouraged to consider use of IUDs in adolescents despite relatively high prevalence rates of STIs in this population. Teens should be screened for gonorrhea and chlamydia at or before IUD placement, although placement should not be delayed if results have not returned and there are no signs of current infection (e.g., purulent discharge, erythematous cervix). If STI testing is positive with an IUD in place, the patient may be treated without removing the IUD if she wants to continue the method. Evidence from 2 systematic reviews did not find benefit in routinely administering misoprostol to women undergoing routine IUD placement to decrease pain or improve provider ease of insertion. A paracervical block with lidocaine may reduce patient discomfort during placement and, along with other medications (e.g., NSAIDs, anxiolytics), may be considered on an individual patient basis, but these are not routinely recommended.
Currently, one contraceptive implant is available in the United States. Originally FDA approved in 2006, the single rod that releases 60 µg/day of etonogestrel has been updated to a radiopaque rod with a new inserter. This progestin-only method keeps etonogestrel at steady serum levels for at least 3 yr and primarily works to inhibit ovulation. Similar to the levonorgestrel IUD, the progestin acts on the uterus to cause an atrophic endometrium and thicken cervical mucus to block sperm penetration; its typical-use failure rate is also <1% (see Fig. 143.1 ). Unlike the IUD, no pelvic exam is required for insertion. A trained provider can quickly place or remove the implant in the upper arm under local anesthesia. Common side effects include amenorrhea, irregular bleeding, or infrequent bleeding, and less often, prolonged or frequent bleeding. One potential unique complication of this method relates to localized infection and other side effects after implantation, such as bleeding, hematoma, or scarring, and if inserted too deeply into the muscle, neural damage or migration; however, these events are rare, occurring in <1% of patients. Minor side effects, such as bruising or skin irritation, are more common but most often resolve without treatment.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here