Competence and Skills Training


‘I look forward to the great advances in knowledge that lie around the corner, but I do sometimes wonder whether the vast sums of money now being spent on research might not produce more rapid and spectacular improvement in health if devoted to the application of what is already known’. Max Rosenheim, President, Royal College of Physicians, 1968

Introduction and Historical Context

Improving maternal and perinatal care, and reducing preventable intrapartum harm in particular, are global priorities. Improved training for intrapartum care is at least part of the solution, but this must be both effective and sustainable.

As early as 1760, a French midwife, Madame du Coudray, recognized that training deficiencies for rebreak: accou cheurs could directly cause harm and furthermore, that training on an ‘obstetric machine’ (mannequin) could reduce preventable harm.

Over 250 years after Madame du Coudray was commissioned to start a national training programme across France, at first glance we appear to have made little progress; a systematic review of obstetric emergencies training published in 2003 concluded that few methods of obstetric skills training had been evaluated, and there was minimal evidence of their effectiveness.

However, since 2003, a nascent evidence base for intrapartum skills training has emerged, and in this chapter we present a review of the current evidence for effective intrapartum skills training to improve care and outcomes, as well as provide some guidance for how training can be sustainably organized and delivered.

Preventable Harm

Women, their families and their insurers have all identified safety in labour as a priority. However, in 2008, the UK-based Kings Fund report Safe Births: Everybody’s Business observed that while the overwhelming majority of births in England are safe, some births are less safe than they could and should be. This observation accurately summarizes the last century of obstetric care in the UK.

In 1917, the UK Medical Research Committee reported that ‘52% of infant deaths were avoidable’ and in 1924 the author of a national UK Maternal Mortality Report described maternal deaths as a ‘burden of avoidable suffering’.

Although perinatal outcomes have improved over the last century, the proportion of ‘avoidable suffering’ has remained depressingly static since these early reports: >50% of intrapartum stillbirths were deemed avoidable with better care in the 4th Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy report, published in 1997, and the most recent Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries across the UK Perinatal Mortality Surveillance report, published in 2018, for stillbirths and neonatal deaths in 2016, identified improvements in care that may have made a difference to the outcome were present in 60–80% of perinatal deaths at term.

The investigation of the root cause of these maternal and perinatal deaths reveals a consistent and repeated set of themes related to substandard care, including failure to recognize problems; failure to seek senior input ; poor or nonexistent team working ; and the requirement to improve skills, such as communication, with emphasis on teams and not individuals.

Improving maternal and perinatal care is also a global priority; the World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that 1500 women die every day from preventable complications of pregnancy and childbirth. Worldwide, there are approximately four million neonatal deaths each year, with a similar number of stillbirths, and these have become the focus for two of the Millennium Development Goals.

Finally, this preventable harm is extraordinarily expensive. Substandard care and its sequelae cost the NHS £3.1 billion in the decade 2000−2010, individual, family and societal costs notwithstanding, and this figure is very likely to rise further.

Skills Training

Effective multiprofessional training appears to be one of the most promising strategies to improve perinatal outcomes across the world, localized for best fit, with a parallel evaluation of outcomes to ensure benefit.

Training has been recommended almost annually since the 1990s; as early as 1996, the 5th Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy recommended a ‘high level of awareness and training for all birth attendants’. Annual ‘Skill Drills’ have been recommended by both the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and RCOG, as well as national bodies on both sides of the Atlantic; the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) in the USA, and the maternity Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST), whose risk management standards have mandated training in the UK since 2000. Training should address teamwork, situational awareness and human factors to improve quality of care. Annual training appears to be appropriate because skills and knowledge are retained for 12 months following training. However, in many healthcare organizations there are frequent rotations of staff that may require an increased frequency of training.

Training is not magic, nor is it automatically effective; therefore, we must ensure that training improves outcomes. There are now numerous studies evaluating the effectiveness of skills training for obstetric emergencies, with increasing evidence that practical training is associated with improvements in clinical outcomes. However, not all training is equal and there are a number of studies where training either did not improve clinical outcome or was associated with an increase in perinatal morbidity. Only when training has been demonstrated to be effective should it be widely implemented, but it can then also be included in national guidance.

Good intrapartum care demands sensitivity, clinical skill and acumen from a multiprofessional team working together in an efficient and effective manner. Therefore high-quality training should be holistic and address all these elements. This requires a broad range of training techniques and tools. The Kings Fund recognized that ‘maternity units could easily provide their own simulation-based training … Any such training should include clinical skills, communication, team working, and awareness of roles within the team’.

We will review the evidence for skills training, particularly focusing on the key elements that are required for successful training, as well as providing some practical recommendations to implement skills training into practice.

Key Elements for Skills Training

In order to improve skills training, it is vital that some key elements are considered. Training should not be an ad hoc endeavour but must be considered, planned and organized in order for it to be effective, enjoyable and sustainable.

Simulation

Some obstetric emergencies may be rare, and when they occur it is paramount that they are managed by experienced, highly trained staff, able to employ management techniques in a timely manner. However due to rarity, it may be difficult for the next generation of ‘experts’ to acquire these skills through clinical practice alone, and additionally problematic for skilled clinicians to maintain their expertise to the best possible standard.

Simulation permits individual health professionals and teams to inculcate skills and cultures in preparation for safe, effective clinical care, whilst gaining confidence and becoming more efficient. Simulation is an educational device, not a place or a technology: it can be as simple as a patient actress wearing trousers with red material to reproduce some of the visual clues for postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), or as complex as a high-technology simulation centre.

We should not overestimate the effect of simulation; a recent review of simulation-based medical education (SMBE) recognized that some but not all SMBE was associated with improvements in clinical outcome.

High Fidelity

Fidelity is a measure of realism. High-fidelity simulation training for shoulder dystocia has demonstrated that training on high-fidelity mannequins is associated with lower rates of brachial plexus injury. Additionally using a patient-actor to improve nontechnical communication and teamwork skills is a vital component as this further increases realism, as well as allowing the incorporation of communication training to the emergency. This is valuable as the way we communicate with women and their birthing partners during emergencies may have dramatic implications on their postnatal morbidity.

Local Teamworking

Conventional healthcare training has typically focused on specific, technical skills, often in professional silos; however, this model does not mirror good quality intrapartum care, which is team-based and multiprofessional. Therefore, it is self-evident that training should be similarly multiprofessional, and this has been recognized by a number of national bodies.

Teamworking is complex, and more than merely a summation of knowledge or skill. Teamwork training recognizes that people make fewer errors when they work in effective teams. Each member of the team can understand their responsibilities when processes are planned and standardized and team members can ‘look out’ for one another, trapping errors before they cause an accident.

Multiprofessional training is also supported by the evidence base, which supports training in multiprofessional teams, particularly with integrated team training. Isolated teamwork training does not appear to be effective in intrapartum care and outcomes. Furthermore, the location of training is also important: only local team training has been associated with improvement in clinical outcomes. Educational theory supports learning in communities of practice and normalizing practice-based tools, rather than the transfer of novel educational material. In-house training also appears to be the most efficient and cost-effective means of training all staff in an institution. Finally, local training can also address local issues as well as a driver for system changes and may be the most effective way of improving outcomes.

Leadership – Roles and Responsibilities

Within scenario-based simulation, team leadership invo-lves providing direction, structure and support for other team members. Teams in maternity care are fluid; the team leader is often the most senior obstetrician present but may be the midwifery co-ordinator or anaesthetist, as well as changing during the emergency – whoever knows the team members’ roles and responsibilities and has adequate experience to anticipate the possible end to an emergency. It is essential that the team leader is nominated, declared verbally and accepted by the rest of the team as early as possible. Other team members must also clearly understand their roles and assume responsibilities for their actions. They should be adaptable, flexible and take a shared responsibility for situational awareness, communication and delegation of tasks. Situational awareness involves the process of taking a wider observation of the emergency, rather than focusing on specific tasks, and constantly re-evaluating, anticipating, planning and prioritizing the management strategy.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here