Chondral Injury and Osteoarthritis: The Impact of Articular Cartilage Lesions


Introduction

Damage to the articular cartilage comprises a spectrum of disease entities ranging from single, focal chondral defects to more advanced degenerative disease and end stage osteoarthritis (OA). Long implicated in the subsequent development of osteoarthritis, focal chondral defects result from various causative factors and those factors that may genetically predispose to early breakdown and wear.

Genetics may predispose to early cartilage wear and OA in addition to metabolic, inflammatory, and developmental diseases, which may lead to articular cartilage damage. These may include Gaucher disease, hemophilia, hemochromatosis, ochronosis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Paget disease, acromegaly, avascular necrosis, neuropathic arthropathy, and joint dysplasia.

Patients are approximately evenly split in reporting a traumatic versus an insidious onset of symptoms; athletic activities are the most common inciting event associated with the diagnosis of a chondral lesion. Traumatic events and developmental causative agents such as OCD predominate in younger age groups. Several large studies have found high-grade chondral lesions (Outerbridge grades III and IV) in 5% to 11% of younger patients (<40 years) and up to 60% of older patients. The most common locations for these defects are the medial femoral condyle (up to 32%) and the patella, and most are detected incidentally during meniscectomy or anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Notably, despite this relatively high incidence, many of these defects are incidental in nature and asymptomatic. It is agreed that articular cartilage lesions have no spontaneous repair potential and a propensity to worsen with time. Even though the natural history is still not completely understood, those involved in cartilage repair agree that one must look for background factors that predispose to the formation of these defects—malalignment and compartment overload of the tibiofemoral or patellofemoral compartments, joint laxity, contracture, meniscal insufficiency, and of course, genetic predisposition to OA—for which we are just beginning to scratch the surface through advancements in genetic, genomic, and epigenetic research.

Effect of Running and Other Sports on Osteoarthritis

Long distance running and its relationship to the development of OA is an issue of great interest. Several studies have suggested that recreational long distance running is not associated with the progression of knee OA. However, the presence of risk factors such as obesity, muscle weakness, or previous joint injury can make the knee more susceptible to the demands associated with participation in sports or athletics. In contrast to recreational involvement, participation in several athletic and sporting activities at the elite level has been associated with an increased risk of lower extremity OA. These activities include those involving torsion and impact such as soccer, weightlifters, and sprinters. Ignoring a known cartilage injury and continuing to participate in torsional impact sports such as soccer has been shown to cause progression of articular cartilage injuries with large areas of delamination developing. Other studies have demonstrated that known articular injury greater than 1 cm 2 have progressed to OA with greater than 14 years follow-up in greater than half the patients observed when allowed to participate in sports. Even when known cartilage injuries are treated with articular cartilage repair by the use of microfracture or autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), OA may develop in as much as one-third of the patients as early as 5 years later. This may be a result of missed axial alignment versus the severity of the instigating initial injury to produce the articular cartilage injury because this has not been found with ACI alone when alignment has been carefully assessed and treated.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Another consideration that often directly relates to athletic participation is injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and subsequent development of knee OA. For patients with an ACL injury, OA susceptibility is reported to be as high as 60% to 90%.

This severe trauma is generally associated with bone bruising at the time of the subluxation of the tibiofemoral joint with tear of the ACL. In fact, biopsies of the overlying articular cartilage to the bone bruise have demonstrated that the superficial and middle zones of articular cartilage have greater than 50% cartilage apoptosis in addition to loss of proteoglycans, indicating severe injury to the overlying cartilage surface with a propensity for late articular cartilage loss and delamination and the possibility of progression to OA. Bone bruises in the study have been shown to occur in greater than 80% of ACL injured knees.

The untreated chronic ACL deficient knee, however, has an increased risk of articular cartilage injury especially as the time from initial injury increases.

Long-term follow-up of ACL injured patients has consistently demonstrated an association with ACL injury and the development of knee OA. It has been postulated that disruption of the normal mechanics of the knee and continued instability with resultant shear forces to the articular surfaces also predispose to injury to the meniscus as the secondary stabilizer of the knee. The role of the loss of the meniscus as a shock absorber plays a significant contributor to subsequent OA development.

Surgical repair of the ACL aims to restore normal biomechanics to the knee. However, ACL repair has not been shown to reduce the incidence of knee OA when compared with nonoperative management. This may support the theory that the initial trauma and bone bruising with overlying cartilage injury eventually fail, leading to OA, which is the author’s belief. Additionally, surgery cannot fully restore normal joint biomechanics. Gait analysis studies revealed altered kinematics of the ACL-reconstructed knee compared with the uninjured contralateral knee. Titchenal et al. identified greater medial compartment motion in 26 ACL-reconstructed knees. Is it speculated that the altered joint loading patterns may still contribute to progression of knee OA despite surgery.

Neuman et al. reported that the primary risk factor for development of knee OA after ACL injury was whether a meniscectomy had been performed. This would seem to support the view that maintenance of knee loading and chondroprotection from the meniscus is an important consideration in this issue.

In general, several causative factors are thought to be involved in the progression of OA in this ACL-injured population, including biological, structural, mechanical, and neuromuscular factors. Further investigation is needed to determine the precise mechanism responsible for early OA development in this population.

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is rarely injured compared with the anterior cruciate ligament. Occasionally patients are asymptomatic with PCL injured knees; when they are symptomatic, they generally exhibit pain and disability rather than functional instability as seen in the ACL-deficient knee. The medial femoral condyle is injured more frequently than the lateral femoral condyle. Varus alignment of the limb predisposes to medially based pain in this situation. To prevent further progression of a medial articular injury, PCL reconstruction is recommended. However, valgus tibial osteotomy combined with increased flexion in the sagittal plane decreases posterior translation of the tibia and in itself may unload and add enough stability. A careful assessment of instability, alignment, and cartilage injury is required to make an appropriate treatment pathway.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here