Cancer of the Stomach


Summary of Key Points

  • Epidemiology and Pathology

  • In the United States, it was predicted that there would be 28,000 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer in 2017, with an estimated 10,960 deaths.

  • In the United States, the site of origin is shifting as more proximal lesions are diagnosed.

  • Biological Characteristics

  • Prognostic factors relate to tumor extent and include nodal involvement and extension beyond the gastric wall.

  • Chronic infection with Helicobacter pylori and environmental and dietary factors increase the risk for gastric cancer. As such, it is more much common in East Asia and developing countries than in the United States and Western Europe. There is ongoing controversy as to whether there are biological differences between gastric cancer in the East versus West.

  • Recent efforts by The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Asian Cancer Research Group have identified specific molecular subtypes of gastric cancer. These have helped for the first time to establish a framework for research stratification and for the evaluation of targeted therapies.

  • Staging Evaluation

  • Staging should always include endoscopy with biopsy, ultrasonography (determine degree of direct tumor extensions), and computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

  • Laparoscopy (to rule out peritoneal seeding or early liver metastases) and positron emission tomography are important tests that complete baseline staging and may help to identify patients with metastatic disease who do not benefit from surgery.

  • Primary Therapy

  • Surgical resection is the primary therapy of resectable gastric and Siewert type III gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) tumors.

  • Cure rates of 80% or higher are achieved only with early lesions (patients with nodes negative, confined to mucosa or submucosa), which are uncommon in the United States.

  • A role for an extended D2 lymph node dissection has not been clearly demonstrated in randomized trials compared with a standard D1 dissection, in part because of significant morbidity and mortality related to the more extensive surgery. Long-term follow-up does suggest a potential benefit for D2 dissection, which should be considered if it can be performed safely in an experienced center.

  • Surgery alone is appropriate for patients with T1-2N0 tumors.

  • Adjuvant Therapy

  • Perioperative chemotherapy and surgery improves outcomes versus surgery alone and is the standard in the United States and Western Europe for T3–4N any or T any N+ tumors. Chemotherapy consists of a fluoropyrimidine/platinum doublet, and the benefit of adding an anthracycline appears to be marginal. The optimal duration of chemotherapy is not known, just as the optimal sequence (pre- or perioperative) has not been fully determined.

  • Adjuvant chemoradiation is an option for patients who have undergone initial surgery for a locally advanced tumor, especially if they have undergone a D0/D1 nodal dissection. Chemoradiation should not be administered postoperatively in a standard fashion to patients who have received preoperative chemotherapy.

  • Adjuvant chemotherapy for a locally advanced tumor after initial surgery with D2 resection with a fluoropyrimidine with or without a platinum drug also has a clearly demonstrated benefit based on Asian studies. There may also be a benefit to adding adjuvant chemoradiation to chemotherapy in such patients if they have lymph node positivity and intestinal histology.

  • Palliation

  • Palliative resection of gastric component of disease may be indicated for significant symptoms from the primary tumor.

  • Phase III trials demonstrate improved quality and duration of life with palliative chemotherapy versus supportive care.

  • Treatment of Metastatic Disease

  • Multiple-drug chemotherapy regimens have response rates of 30% to 50% and are associated with progression-free survival of 4 to 6 months and overall survival of 9 to 12 months.

  • A fluoropyrimidine/platinum doublet is considered the standard combination globally. Although an anthracycline is routinely added to this doublet in the United Kingdom, there are no data to support a benefit. On the other hand, there is a benefit to adding docetaxel to the doublet but at the expense of significant toxicity.

  • There are now randomized data showing a benefit for second- and third-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

  • The addition of trastuzumab to first-line chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with HER2 -positive disease.

  • Ramucirumab, an antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, has activity in the second-line setting as monotherapy or when combined with paclitaxel chemotherapy.

  • The evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors is of intense interest. At this time, one phase III study in East Asian patients reveals modest but very notable activity in chemorefractory patients for nivolumab, an antibody against programmed death-1.

  • Algorithm

  • Surgical resection is the primary therapy of resectable gastric and Siewert type III GEJ tumors.

  • There is a benefit for D2 lymph node dissection, provided it can be performed by an experienced surgeon in a high-volume center.

  • In addition to surgery, the two options are perioperative chemotherapy versus upfront surgery and adjuvant treatment.

  • In terms of perioperative chemotherapy regimens, the FLOT regimen (docetaxel, infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) has now emerged as a new standard of care.

  • The two adjuvant strategies are either chemotherapy or chemoradiation. We favor chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine/platinum doublet for 6 months, given the increased toxicity of chemoradiation.

  • For patients who undergo initial surgery and have intestinal-type tumors with lymph node positivity, consideration can be given to adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine/platinum doublet and chemoradiation with a fluoropyrimidine.

  • Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease, in which response rates and duration of response are modest for most patients. The standard doublet consists of a fluoropyrimidine and platinum drug. Adding docetaxel to this doublet slightly improves outcomes in patients with adenocarcinomas but at the expense of significant additional toxicity.

  • The addition of trastuzumab to first-line chemotherapy for HER2- positive adenocarcinomas incrementally improves outcomes. Similarly, ramucirumab with or without paclitaxel in the second-line setting is a validated strategy for adenocarcinomas.

  • There are now phase III studies showing benefit for a taxane and irinotecan in the second- and third-line settings.

  • The evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors against the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 axis reveals a modest but notable benefit in the metastatic setting and is of high priority.

  • Although conceptually attractive, there are no data that show a clear benefit for intraperitoneal chemotherapy either in addition to standard treatments in the curative setting or as palliative therapy for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

  • There may also be a role for palliative surgical resection or radiation (with or without chemotherapy) under specific circumstances.

Gastric cancer, an uncommon but highly virulent malignancy in the United States, was predicted to be diagnosed in 28,000 patients in 2017, with an estimated 10,960 deaths. Compared with its relative rarity in the United States, gastric cancer is endemic in parts of East Asia, which account for more than half of the approximately 1 million cases that develop per year globally.

In the United States, the incidence of gastric cancer has decreased significantly in the past 50 years, but the location of the primary tumor has also changed. Distal gastric cancer, which previously predominated, has become uncommon, and the incidence of tumors of the gastric cardia and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) have increased 4% to 10% per year among US men since 1976.

Changing epidemiologic factors account for the increasing incidence of proximal tumors. Chronic infection with Helicobacter pylori has been implicated in the development of gastric cancer on the basis of epidemiological evidence. A decline in H. pylori infection in the United States has led to an overall decrease in the number of gastric cancer cases.

In the metastatic setting, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. Although there have been incremental improvements in terms of efficacy and tolerability, outcomes remain poor. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently the focus of intensive evaluation.

For locally advanced gastric cancer, surgery remains the most important component of curative therapy. Numerous studies have evaluated pre- and postoperative strategies for locally advanced disease, including chemotherapy or chemoradiation. As a whole, these studies show that some treatment in addition to surgery clearly improves outcomes.

These studies have variously enrolled purely gastric cancers (especially distal tumors, which is the predominant location in Asia) or have also included tumors that involve the GEJ or even lower esophagus. Consistent with guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, our practice pattern is to apply the conclusions of these studies based on the Siewert classification of GEJ adenocarcinomas. Siewert type I tumors arise from the distal esophagus and infiltrate the GEJ from above, and type III tumors are gastric cardia tumors that infiltrate the GEJ from below; type II tumors are true tumors of the GEJ. Therefore this review is applicable only to Siewert type III GEJ and gastric adenocarcinomas. Specifically, preoperative chemoradiation is a validated option for lower esophageal and Siewert type I or II GEJ adenocarcinomas, but this approach and these tumors are not the focus of this review.

Etiology and Biological Characteristics

Etiology

Factors that have been associated with a higher incidence of gastric cancer include smoked or salted foods, foods contaminated with aflatoxin, low intake of fruits and vegetables, low socioeconomic status, and possibly a decreased use of refrigeration. Possible occupational relationships include coal mining and rubber or asbestos workers. Precursor pathological conditions include pernicious anemia, achlorhydria atrophic gastritis, gastric ulcers, and adenomatous polyps. Between 5% and 10% of individuals with pernicious anemia subsequently develop malignancy. Prior partial gastrectomy for benign gastric or duodenal ulcer disease produces an increased risk of subsequent malignancy in the gastric remnant with latency periods of 20 years or more.

Several studies have shown a three- to sixfold increased risk of gastric cancer in individuals with H. pylori infection versus those with no infection, but the precise role of this bacterium in the etiology of gastric cancer remains unknown. A variety of bacterial, patient, and environment factors most likely act in combination to affect the development of gastric carcinoma. The increased association of H. pylori with gastric cancer seems to be mainly with distal gastric cancers and intestinal-type malignancy.

In part only because a small minority of H. pylori –infected individuals develop gastric cancer, there are limited data as to whether treatment of the H. pylori infection reduces the risk of subsequent malignancy. However, a recent meta-analysis does suggest that eradication reduces the incidence of gastric cancer. Although there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend screening and eradication in countries where H. pylori is endemic, it is certainly reasonable to treat it if chronic infection is diagnosed.

There has been a dramatic increase in the incidence of GEJ and gastric cardia carcinoma during the past few decades, similar to the increase in distal esophagus adenocarcinomas, suggesting that they may have similar etiologies. Although the reasons for these changes are unknown, they may be related to the increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obesity.

Biological Characteristics

Histology

Gastric adenocarcinomas have been categorized by using both microscopic ( Fig. 72.1 ) and gross pathological features. The Lauren classification system includes two subtypes: an intestinal type with improved prognosis that predominates in regions with high prevalence of gastric cancer (e.g., East Asia) and a diffuse histologic type with a poor prognosis that occurs more commonly in countries with a low prevalence of stomach cancer (e.g., United States and Western Europe). These cancers are also stratified using the 2010 World Health Organization classification, which recognizes four major histologic patterns: tubular, papillary, mucinous, and poorly cohesive (including signet ring cell carcinoma).

Figure 72.1, Photomicrographs demonstrating histopathologic features of gastric cancer. (A–C) Gastric adenocarcinoma, intestinal type. (A) The neoplasm shows complex gland formation (arrows) . This type is regarded as moderately differentiated or grade 2 in a four-grade system (×125). (B) This tumor infiltrates the superficial portion of the submucosa. Typical of intestinal-type adenocarcinoma, the preexisting gastric epithelium is obliterated (×42.5). (C) This tumor extends into perigastric serosa and, in view of the more irregular gland formation, is graded with grade 3 of 4 (×42.5). (D–F) Diffuse-type gastric adenocarcinoma. (D) Diffuse-type adenocarcinomas often contain signet cells (arrows) (×225). (E) Linitis plastica. Note how the underlying mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria appear thickened but are otherwise intact in contrast to intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (B) (×22.5). (F) Linitis plastica at high power. Neoplastic cells may be very subtle (arrows) . This tumor extended to the peritoneal surface and had metastasized (×125).

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here