Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
78,980 new primary brain tumors will be diagnosed in the United States in 2018, of which approximately one-third will be malignant.
3,560 new childhood (ages 0–19 years) primary benign and malignant CNS tumors will be diagnosed in 2018. Brain tumors are now the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among children at a rate of 5.47 per 100,000 population, surpassing leukemia (5.0 per 100,000).
Radiation exposure is the most established risk factor for brain tumors. Hereditary syndromes including neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, tuberous sclerosis, von Hippel-Lindau disease, and Li-Fraumeni syndrome are associated with a higher risk of brain tumors.
Taking all age groups into account, histologic types of CNS tumors include meningiomas (36.6%), glioblastomas (14.9%), other astrocytomas (5.6%), nerve sheath tumors (8,2%), tumors of the pituitary (15.9%), oligodendrogliomas (1,5%), ependymomas (1.8%), and embryonal tumors including medulloblastomas (1%).
Among children aged 14 years or younger, histologic tumor types include pilocytic astrocytomas (18%), glioblastomas (2.8%), other astrocytomas (8.5%), ependymal tumors (5.8%), oligodendrogliomas (0.7%), embryonal tumors including medulloblastomas (13.8%), craniopharyngiomas (4%), and germ cell tumors (3.8%).
Most brain tumors are supratentorial; notable exceptions include brainstem gliomas, cerebellar pilocytic astrocytomas, medulloblastomas, and ependymomas that involve the posterior fossa.
Glioblastoma (World Health Organization grade IV astrocytoma) and brainstem gliomas in children carry the poorest prognosis. Pilocytic astrocytomas carry the best prognosis. In 2016, the World Health Organization reclassified brain tumors to include molecular diagnostics based on genetic mutations, which can clarify prognosis and guide treatment.
General signs and symptoms from mass effect, increased intracranial pressure, edema, or shift or destruction of surrounding brain tissue may include changes in personality and cognitive function, headaches, nausea, vomiting, seizures, and papilledema.
Focal signs and symptoms may include focal seizures, visual changes, speech abnormalities, gait abnormalities, and cranial nerve deficits.
Posterior fossa tumors often compress the fourth ventricle, causing hydrocephalus, and frequently manifest with ataxia and intractable nausea and vomiting.
Brainstem gliomas often manifest with a combination of cranial nerve palsies and “long tract” signs such as hemianesthesia or hemiparesis coupled with ataxia in cases with cerebellar involvement.
Pineal region tumors (germ cell tumors, pineocytomas, pineoblastomas, and gliomas of this region) may compress the aqueduct of Sylvius, causing hydrocephalus. Compression of the pretectal area produces Parinaud syndrome, with paralysis of upgaze, ptosis, and loss of pupillary light reflexes, along with retraction-convergence nystagmus.
Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium contrast is the most sensitive technique.
Computed tomography scanning is good for visualizing intratumoral calcifications and bone erosion but poor at visualizing the posterior fossa.
Positron emission tomography and advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques may help discriminate between tumor recurrence and radiation necrosis or pseudoprogression.
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy may help distinguish a high-grade tumor from a low-grade tumor or radiation necrosis.
For most brain tumors, tissue diagnosis is required (an exception may be selected brainstem gliomas).
Treatment for brain tumors is highly dependent on histologic type. For many tumors (e.g., gliomas, meningiomas, primitive neuroectodermal tumors [PNETs], and ependymomas), maximal surgical resection that is safely feasible is the primary treatment.
For some tumors (e.g., glioblastomas, PNETs, and germ cell tumors), radiation therapy is an essential adjunct treatment after surgery.
For some tumors (e.g., acoustic neuromas and glomus tumors), either irradiation or surgery can offer successful control; the decision between the two is based on assessment of adverse effects.
Chemotherapy is assuming an increasingly important role in the management of many brain tumors (e.g., glioblastomas, germ cell tumors, anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, PNETs, and CNS lymphomas).
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors is based on tumor histology and cellular origin and was established to provide a common classification and grading system of human CNS tumors that is accepted and used worldwide. The WHO divides brain tumors into classes: neuroepithelial tumors, tumors of the cranial and paraspinal nerves, tumors of the meninges, lymphomas and hematopoietic neoplasms, and germ cell tumors and tumors of the sellar region. The different histologic types of CNS tumors are shown in Table 63.1 . Meningiomas, glioblastomas, and astrocytomas constitute more than half of all CNS tumors. The frequency of different histologic tumor types varies with age, as shown in Fig. 63.1 . The incidence of all brain tumors is highest in the 75- to 84-year-old age group. The incidence of meningiomas increases with increasing age, whereas for gliomas and pituitary adenomas the incidence increases with age but then declines at the highest age category (see Fig. 63.1A ). Certain histologic types, such as germ cell tumors, medulloblastomas, and pilocytic astrocytomas, are far more common in children than in adults ( Table 63.2 ; See Fig. 63.1B ).
WHO 2016 Classification of Primary CNS Tumors | F requency (%) of P rimary CNS T umors by H istology | ||
---|---|---|---|
Grade | In All Age Groups a | Among Young Adults b | |
Tumors of neuroepithelial tissue | 29.3 | 28 | |
Astrocytic tumors | |||
|
I | 1.4 | 2.8 |
Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma | I | ||
Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma | II | ||
Anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma | III | ||
|
II | 2.2 | |
|
III | 1.7 | |
|
IV | 14.9 | 4.4 |
Diffuse midline glioma H3K27M-mutant | IV | ||
Oligodendroglial tumors | 1.0 | 3.5 | |
|
II | ||
|
III | ||
Ependymal tumors | |||
Ependymoma | II | 1.8 | 3.5 |
Ependymoma RELA fusion positive | II or III | ||
Anaplastic ependymoma | III | ||
Subependymoma | I | ||
Myxopapillary ependymoma | I | ||
Other gliomas | |||
Angiocentric glioma | I | ||
Chordoid glioma of third ventricle | II | ||
Neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors | 1.2 | ||
Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor | |||
Gangliocytoma | I | ||
Ganglioglioma | I | ||
Anaplastic ganglioglioma | III | ||
Dysplastic gangliocytoma of cerebellum (Lhermitte-Duclos) | I | ||
Desmoplastic infantile astrocytoma and ganglioglioma | I | ||
Papillary glioneuronal tumor | I | ||
Rosette-forming glioneuronal tumor | I | ||
Central neurocytoma | II | ||
Extraventricular neurocytoma | II | ||
Cerebellar liponeurocytoma | II | ||
Tumors of the pineal region | 0.2 | ||
Pineocytoma | I | ||
Pineal parenchymal tumor of intermediate differentiation | II or III | ||
Pineoblastoma | IV | ||
Papillary tumor of the pineal region | II or III | ||
Embryonal tumors | 1.0 | 1.6 | |
Medulloblastoma (all subtypes) | IV | ||
Embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes, C19MC-altered | IV | ||
Medulloepithelioma | IV | ||
CNS embryonal tumor, NOS | IV | ||
Atypical teratoid or rhabdoid tumor | IV | ||
CNS embryonal tumor with rhabdoid features | IV | ||
Tumors of cranial and paraspinal nerves | 8.3 | 8.6 | |
Schwannoma (neurilemmoma, neurinoma) | I | ||
Neurofibroma | I | ||
Perineuroma | I | ||
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor | II, III, IV | ||
Tumors of the meninges | 37.8 | ||
Tumors of meningiothelial cells | |||
Meningioma | I | 36.6 | 15.9 |
Atypical meningioma | II | ||
Anaplastic (malignant) meningioma | III | ||
Other neoplasms related to the meninges | |||
Solitary fibrous tumor, hemangiopericytoma | I, II, or III | ||
Hemangioblastoma, hemangioma | I | 3.5 | |
Lymphomas and hematopoietic neoplasms | 2.0 | 1.5 | |
Germ cell tumors | 0.4 | 1.3 | |
Tumors of the sellar region | 16.7 | 32.2 | |
Craniopharyngioma | I | 0.8 | 1.2 |
Tumors of the pituitary | I | 15.9 | 31 |
Granular cell tumor | I | ||
Pituicytoma | I | ||
Spindle cell oncocytoma | I |
a Frequency among all patients with primary brain and CNS tumors espectively (N = 368,117). Data from CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2010–2014 (Ostrom et al. 2016).
b Frequency among young adults (15–34 years of age) with primary brain and CNS tumors (N = 54,388, respectively).
Histologic Tumor Type | F requency (%) | |
---|---|---|
Age 0–14 Yr ( n = 16,653) | Age 15–19 Yr ( n = 6869) | |
Pilocytic astrocytoma | 18 | 9.4 |
Glioma malignant NOS | 14.3 | 5.1 |
Embryonal tumors, including medulloblastoma | 13.8 | 3.6 |
All other | 10.2 | 11.5 |
Other astrocytomas | 8.5 | 7.4 |
Neuronal and mixed neuronal-glial tumors | 6.6 | 7.9 |
Ependymal tumors | 5.8 | 3.9 |
Nerve sheath tumors | 4.9 | 5.9 |
Tumors of the pituitary | 4.5 | 27.8 |
Craniopharyngioma | 4.0 | 2,1 |
Germ cell tumors | 3.8 | 4.1 |
Glioblastoma | 2.8 | 3,3 |
Meningioma | 1.6 | 5.0 |
Oligodendroglioma | 0.7 | 1.6 |
Oligoastrocytic tumors | 0.4 | 0.8 |
Lymphoma | 0.2 | 0.4 |
For most patients with primary CNS tumors, surgery usually is the initial therapy. Radiation therapy is often an important component of treatment after surgery, but for management of malignant disease, chemotherapy has an expanding role. A great deal of knowledge has been amassed during the past two decades regarding the biology of brain tumors that should lead to improved treatments in the near future.
An estimated 79,270 new cases of primary CNS tumors were expected to be diagnosed in the United States in 2017. Approximately 25,850 of these tumors were expected to be malignant, representing 1.4% of all primary malignant cancers diagnosed in the United States. Malignant CNS tumors were expected to cause approximately 17,000 deaths in 2017.
On the basis of data provided by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, Deorah and colleagues found that the incidence of brain cancer increased until 1987, when the annual percentage of change reversed direction. Elderly persons experienced an increase in brain cancer until 1985, but their rates were stable thereafter. Overall, however, the incidence of glioblastoma has been increasing, with survival only modestly improved during the past decade.
Ionizing radiation is one of the few factors shown to have a strong association with the development of brain tumors. Exposure to ionizing radiation represents the most important exogenous risk factor for childhood brain tumors. Prenatal diagnostic x-ray exposure increases the risk of childhood brain tumors, and various reports describe the occurrence of gliomas, meningiomas, and other brain tumors in children who received radiation therapy to the head for tinea capitis and for prior malignancies. A dose of 1 to 2 Gy of radiation, which was used to treat tinea capitis in Israeli children, was associated with an increased risk of the development of brain tumors—specifically, meningiomas, gliomas, and nerve sheath tumors. A dose-response correlation in the induction of brain tumors was seen, with a relative risk of 3.0 at a dose of 1 Gy. Tumors developed at least 6 years after irradiation, with a mean interval greater than 15 years. Even lower doses of radiation delivered with radium-226 that were used to treat hemangiomas in Swedish infants (with a mean dose to the brain of 7 cGy) were found to be associated with an excess risk of intracranial tumors, including pituitary adenomas, gliomas, meningiomas, and nerve sheath tumors.
A large amount of data has been accumulated on the incidence of brain tumors in patients who received cranial irradiation for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The estimated cumulative risk of secondary malignant brain tumors after childhood ALL therapy is 0.5% at 10 years after completion of therapy. In a study from St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, the actuarial 20-year probability of developing a brain tumor in these patients was 1.4%. The probability of developing a high-grade glioma was greater in children younger than 5 years of age at diagnosis than in those 6 years of age or older (1.08% versus 0.45%; P = .045). An apparent dose-response correlation was observed; the 20-year risk of developing a brain tumor was 3.2% in patients who received more than 30 Gy, versus 1.03% in patients who received 21 Gy or less ( P = .015). No CNS malignancies were seen in patients who did not receive cranial irradiation. The latency period between irradiation and the diagnosis of a brain tumor ranged from 5.9 to 29 years (median, 12.6 years) but was longer for meningiomas (median, 19 years) than for high-grade gliomas (median, 9.1 years). Very similar results regarding the frequency of brain tumors, latency, and dependence on prior cranial irradiation were seen in studies from the German Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster group and the Children's Cancer Study Group. The types of brain tumors that have been reported in these series include gliomas, meningiomas, and medulloblastomas. Patients who received cranial irradiation for ALL also often received intrathecal chemotherapy. It has been suggested that cranial irradiation and intrathecal chemotherapy may work synergistically to increase the incidence of glial tumors.
Viruses can induce brain tumors in animals in the experimental setting; however, no conclusive data point to viruses as a cause of brain tumors in humans (reviewed by Berleur and Cordier ). The relationship of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and gliomas remains controversial. The HCMV and gliomas symposium held in April 2011 resulted in consensus that sufficient evidence exists to conclude that HCMV viral gene expression exists in most, if not all, malignant gliomas and that HCMV could influence the phenotype of malignant gliomas by interacting with signaling pathways. Other authors who have used the data regarding cytomegalovirus (CMV) seroprevalence in the United States from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1988 to 2004, have concluded that a possible CMV-glioblastoma association could not be corroborated with CMV seropositivity rates.
Also lacking is conclusive evidence that occupational exposure to industrial chemicals leads to the development of brain tumors, although a number of studies have suggested such a link (reviewed by Wrensch and coworkers). Some of the chemicals that can induce brain tumors in laboratory animals, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, can do so only when administered by direct contact or transplacentally, but not by inhalation or dermal contact; the latter two modes of exposure are more relevant in the occupational setting. Specific chemicals that have been examined include cosmetics containing N -nitroso compounds, organic solvents, chemicals used in the manufacture of synthetic rubber, formaldehyde, phenols, polycyclic aromatic compounds, polyvinyl chloride, and pesticides. Although many chemicals can induce brain tumors in laboratory animals, no definitive associations have been found in humans. For example, N -nitroso compounds, which commonly are present in foods, are known to be neurocarcinogenic in animals. Oxidants in the environment can cause DNA damage, so it has been hypothesized that antioxidants, such as vitamin E, found in certain foods may protect against the development of cancers. Epidemiologic studies, however, have provided mixed support for the idea that the intake of N -nitroso compounds, antioxidants, or specific nutrients in foods can influence the risk of developing brain tumors.
A great deal of interest has emerged in a possible association between the use of cell phones and the risk of brain tumors. In a case-control study, Inskip and coworkers were unable to show a correlation between the duration of cell phone use and the development of gliomas, meningiomas, and acoustic neuromas. Other large case-control studies also have failed to find any association between cell phone use and the risk of developing brain tumors. A meta-analysis of nine case-control studies revealed no increased risk in analog or digital cellular phone users. Nevertheless, some still claim that there is a link between cell phone use and brain tumors. In addition, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a WHO agency, has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.”
Other factors that have been analyzed for their possible relationship to the development of brain tumors include a history of head trauma and injury, drugs and medications, allergies, seizures, smoking and alcohol consumption, and exposure to power-frequency electromagnetic fields. None of these factors, however, has been conclusively shown to be important (reviewed by Wrensch and associates ).
Most brain tumors represent sporadic cases; however, familial clustering has been noted. It is estimated that hereditary syndromes account for 2% of childhood brain tumors, although this may be an underestimate because hereditary syndromes may be undiagnosed in a number of cases. Some hereditary syndromes known to be associated with brain tumors are listed in Table 63.3 (reviewed by Kimmelman and Liang ). Some of the associations are extremely strong. Nearly 70% of all optic pathway gliomas occur in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and acoustic neuromas commonly occur in patients with NF2. In addition, hereditary immunosuppression disorders such as Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, treatment-associated immunosuppression as in organ-transplant recipients, and exogenous immunosuppression as in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are known to be associated with an increased risk of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).
Syndrome | Associated CNS Tumors | Gene | Chromosomal Locus | Defective Protein and Normal Function |
---|---|---|---|---|
Neurofibromatosis type 1 | Optic pathway gliomas, meningiomas, neuromas | NF1 | 17q11-12 | Neurofibromin; GTPase-activating protein that negatively regulates Ras |
Neurofibromatosis type 2 | Bilateral acoustic neuromas, meningiomas, gliomas | NF2 | 22q12 | Merlin; related to membrane cytoskeleton linker protein 4.1 superfamily |
Tuberous sclerosis | Cerebral hamartomas | TSC1 | 9q34 | Hamartin |
Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) | TSC2 | 16p13 | Tuberin; associates with hamartin; both are involved in signaling downstream of Akt | |
von Hippel-Lindau syndrome | Hemangioblastomas | VHL | 3p25-29 | VHL protein; degrades HIF-1α |
Li-Fraumeni syndrome | Malignant gliomas | TP53 | 17p13 | p53; maintains genomic stability |
Cowden syndrome | Meningiomas | PTEN | 10q23 | PTEN; lipid phosphatase, counters PI3 kinase activation |
Gorlin syndrome (nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome) | Medulloblastomas | PTCH | 9q22 | Cell surface receptor; regulates normal brain development |
Turcot syndrome | Medulloblastomas | APC | 5q21 | APC; part of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway |
Malignant gliomas | hMLH1 | 3p21 | Involved in mismatch repair | |
Malignant gliomas | PMS2 | 7p22 | Involved in mismatch repair | |
Familial retinoblastoma | Pineoblastomas | RB | 13q14 | Rb protein; regulates entry into S phase |
Ataxia-telangiectasia | CNS lymphoma | ATM | 11q22-23 | ATM protein; involved in DNA damage sensing |
Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome 1 | Pituitary adenomas | MEN1 | 11q13 | Menin |
Normal cells rely on growth factors secreted in their local environment to stimulate their growth. However, many CNS tumors have developed the ability to express their own growth factors along with the respective receptors, resulting in an autocrine loop that allows for self-stimulation. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRα), for example, is overexpressed in all grades of astrocytomas, but only higher-grade tumors overexpress the ligands PDGFA and PDGFB. Insulin-like growth factors and their receptors both are expressed in brain tumors, including gliomas and meningiomas. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is amplified or overexpressed in 50% of glioblastomas, and expression of transforming growth factor–α (TGF-α), a ligand that binds to this receptor, is increased in many gliomas. Both scatter factor (also known as hepatocyte growth factor ) and its receptor c-Met are expressed in gliomas, with the highest level of expression seen in the most malignant tumors.
As a result of increasing expression of receptors and ligands, increased signaling occurs in many brain tumors, resulting in activation of many different pathways that are important in proliferation (reviewed by Rao and James ). The best studied of these pathways is the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which involves Ras and Raf. Another pathway that has attracted much attention is the phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3) kinase pathway, which leads to activation of Akt. Mutation of PTEN , which occurs in 30% to 40% of glioblastomas, also can lead to increased Akt activation.
Ras activation commonly is seen in human astrocytomas and neurofibromas despite the fact that these tumors rarely contain Ras mutations. In astrocytomas, Ras activation probably occurs through activation of growth factor receptors such as EGFR and PDGFR. Other mechanisms of activation of aberrant G proteins have been identified in other CNS tumors (reviewed by Woods and coworkers ). In NF1, loss of expression of neurofibromin, an inactivator of Ras, is seen (see Table 63.3 ). This loss of neurofibromin leads to the increased Ras activation seen in NF1-associated astrocytomas. Pituitary adenomas often show activation of the alpha subunit of the large heterotrimeric Gs protein, resulting in mitogenic signaling.
The Wnt pathway has been shown to play a role in glioma tumorigenesis. Investigators have shown that the Wnt-specific secretory protein Evi is overexpressed in astrocytomas. Furthermore, the same researchers showed that the depletion of this protein in glioma cells leads to decreased cell proliferation and apoptosis. In addition, silencing of Evi in glioma cells leads to reduced cell migration and the ability to form tumors in vivo . Involvement of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in gliomas has been reviewed by Zhang and colleagues.
Cell proliferation is intimately tied to cell cycle regulation. Mutations in the p16/Cdk4 or Cdk6/cyclin D/Rb pathway or the p21/p53/Mdm2/p19 ARF pathway are common in many brain tumors, particularly gliomas.
Many brain tumors, particularly gliomas, display an invasive phenotype with infiltration of tumor cells into surrounding tissues, making a cure very difficult to achieve. In fact, tumor recurrence was reported in one case even after resection of the entire hemisphere in which a glioma was located. The process of invasion involves several steps: detachment of the invading cell from the primary tumor mass, adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM), degradation of ECM, and cell motility and contractility. The details of the mechanisms of glioma invasion are only beginning to be understood. Numerous molecules associated with invasion have been found to be upregulated in gliomas, including tenascin-C, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), various integrins, and matrix metalloproteinases (reviewed by Demuth and Berens ).
Some controversy exists regarding deregulated Rho guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) signaling in brain tumors. For example, although RhoA and RhoB are reduced in some astrocytic tumors, some studies report Rho-dependent lysophosphatidic acid–induced migration in glioma cells. Expression of another member of the Rho subfamily, Rac1, has been found to be reduced in astrocytic tumors; in addition, this protein has been shown to be overexpressed and to have induced invasion in medulloblastoma tumors. The role of Rho GTPases has been reviewed by Khalil and El-Sibai.
For a tumor to grow beyond a certain size, it must develop a blood supply. The vasculature of normal brain, which is composed of endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes, is highly specialized. Together these cells form the blood-brain barrier, which selectively restricts exchange of molecules between the intracerebral and extracerebral circulatory systems. As primary brain tumors or brain metastases grow, the integrity of the blood-brain barrier is compromised.
A number of growth factors are known to be important in angiogenesis. The most prominent of these is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is overexpressed in many brain tumors. In one study, increasing VEGF expression correlated with increasing malignant grade in astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, and ependymomas. In this study it also was found that increased expression of the VEGF receptors Flt-1 and KDR in tumor vasculature correlated with increasing VEGF expression and malignant grade. Hypoxia and acidosis have been shown to independently regulate VEGF transcription in brain tumors in vitro and in vivo. In addition, both tumor suppressors and oncogenes, hormones, cytokines, and other signaling molecules have been shown to regulate VEGF expression. Growth factors other than VEGF that may play a role in angiogenesis in gliomas include members of the TGF-β family, PDGF, placental growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, and scatter factor/hepatocyte scatter factor. Angiogenesis can also be negatively regulated by factors such as thrombospondins 1 and 2 (TSP1 and TSP2). TSP1 is positively regulated by p53, and thus loss of p53, which commonly occurs in gliomas, can lead to decreased TSP1 expression and increased angiogenesis.
Angiogenesis is particularly prominent within glioblastomas. Among the characteristic features of these tumors are endothelial proliferation and neovascularization. A variety of growth factors that can increase angiogenesis are expressed by glioblastomas, with the foremost being VEGF. VEGF, also known as vascular permeability factor, is a potent inducer of capillary permeability. The high levels of VEGF expression in glioblastomas may be responsible for the edema associated with these tumors. Some evidence indicates that genetic changes common to glioblastomas, such as EGFR activation and PTEN mutation, may contribute to high levels of VEGF expression, perhaps through activation of the PI3 kinase pathway.
Despite expressing high levels of VEGF, glioblastomas contain significant regions of hypoxia, which may be a cause of treatment resistance. Hypoxia has been shown to be present in malignant gliomas with both polarographic needle electrode measurement and binding of the 2-nitroimidazole EF5. Hypoxia, as measured by binding of EF5, has been shown to correlate with more rapid tumor recurrence. Evidence indicates that hypoxia is involved in many aspects of tumor growth, including induction of angiogenesis, increased invasion and metastases, resistance to chemotherapy, resistance to radiotherapy, increased brain tumor stem cell population, and stem cell genetic instability.
The histologic features of glioblastoma are consistent with this notion of hypoxia, including the presence of pseudopalisading necrosis and proliferative blood vessels. Pseudopalisades seen within glioblastomas represent a wave of tumor cells actively migrating away from central hypoxia and are thought to arise as a result of vasoocclusion and intravascular thrombosis. High VEGF levels and robust neovascularization may be explained by hypoxia-induced VEGF simulation of new vessels.
The tumor stem cell hypothesis may help explain the resistance of glioblastoma to current therapies. The tumor stem cell hypothesis suggests that a subset of tumor cells, called tumor stem cells, stemlike cells, or tumor-initiating cells, are endowed with characteristics of normal stem cells, such that they can self-renew and are able to produce a variety of cell types. Because the stemlike cells have properties different from the cells constituting most of the tumor, a different approach to eradicating these stemlike cells may be necessary.
Identification of glioblastoma stemlike cells has proved to be challenging. Early studies showed differences between CD133+ and CD133− glioma cells, including differences in tumor-forming capacity in xenografts. However, other studies have shown that CD133− stemlike cells may also be capable of forming tumors, although these two cell populations exhibit distinct molecular profiles and growth characteristics.
Efforts are being made to elucidate transduction pathways that influence tumorigenicity and are unique to glioma stemlike cells to allow treatments to target these pathways. It has been demonstrated that glioma stemlike cells may be relatively radioresistant as a result of overexpression of DNA damage repair proteins, including the checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2. The cells may be made more radiosensitive by using specific inhibitors of Chk1/Chk2. Piccirillo and colleagues showed that CD133+ glioblastoma stem cells have a functional bone morphogenetic protein receptor pathway. By exposing mice implanted with orthotopic glioblastomas to bone morphogenetic protein 4, these researchers were able to cause the CD133+ cells to differentiate toward glial cells and reduce tumor growth. These two strategies have the potential to be used to target stem cells in glioblastomas. Another potential strategy is to target the tumor stroma, which provides a specialized niche for tumor cells. Calabrese and associates showed that stem cells in brain tumors occupied a perivascular niche and could be targeted by antiangiogenic therapy.
Other potential targets include signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), a transcription factor activated by interleukin (IL)-6, a molecule that is overexpressed in glioblastoma. STAT3 is constitutively active in numerous cancers, including glioblastoma. Expression of a dominant negative mutant STAT3 or silencing STAT3 with a lentivirus have been shown to reduce proliferation of a glioblastoma cell line. Other groups are investigating nanotechnology to target glioma stemlike cells. Some investigators have used iron oxide nanoparticles conjugated to a glioblastoma-specific target of EGFRvIII in an animal model, whereas others have used curcumin nanoparticles to inhibit glioblastoma and medulloblastoma cell proliferation in culture. Glioblastoma stemlike cells have been reviewed in detail by Nduom and colleagues and by Tabatabai and Weller. The stemlike cell hypothesis also applies to other brain tumor histologic types. The roles of medulloblastoma and ependymoma tumor-initiating cells have been reviewed by Manoranjan and colleagues and Poppleton and Gilbertson, respectively.
Parenchymal brain tumors produce clinical signs and symptoms by three main mechanisms, each of which has important implications for therapy. First, infiltration along nerve fiber tracts is typical of primary brain tumors such as low-grade astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. The first clinical manifestation may be seizures. Normal brain tissue may be present within areas appearing abnormal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and functional mapping may be necessary for safe resection of these slowly growing tumors. Second, displacement of brain tissue with production of vasogenic edema is typical of cerebral metastases. Such tumors sometimes can be resected or irradiated focally with less risk to adjacent normal brain tissue than is the case with infiltrating tumors. Third, rapidly growing aggressive tumors such as high-grade astrocytomas may enlarge as a mass and also destroy surrounding neuropil to such an extent that surgical resection, although helpful for the reduction of mass effect and intracranial pressure (ICP), may not alleviate local symptoms and signs.
Intracranial neoplasms usually produce progressive symptoms. Location and rate of growth determine both general and specific localizing symptoms and signs. Thus a patient with a low-grade glial tumor may have seizures for many years or may exhibit behavioral alteration for many months before focal signs develop. With a more aggressive glial neoplasm, headache and focal signs may develop over a few weeks. Apoplectic onset is associated with hemorrhage or the development of hydrocephalus.
Brain tumor symptoms may be general, localizing, or falsely localizing. General symptoms include headache, lethargy, nausea, vomiting, and nonspecific cognitive or balance difficulties. These symptoms may be manifestations of increased ICP from a combination of expanding tumor volume and the production of associated vasogenic cerebral edema. Tumors also may cause raised ICP by obstruction of the ventricular system or blockage of the venous sinuses. Abrupt headache and exacerbation of neurologic signs may accompany the plateau waves of sudden increased ICP.
Sustained ICP in excess of 200 mm H 2 O causes brain shifts that can displace brain tissue through fixed intracranial openings, producing life-threatening herniation syndromes ( Fig. 63.2 ). The uncal herniation syndrome is caused by tumors arising in the lateral aspect of the brain, most commonly the temporal lobe. An early, consistent sign of compressive uncal herniation is a unilaterally dilated pupil due to compression of the ipsilateral third cranial nerve, which is followed by extraocular movement abnormalities consistent with an oculomotor palsy. The posterior cerebral artery may be compressed against the tentorium, leading to homonymous hemianopia. Brainstem compression can cause compression of the contralateral cerebral peduncle against the edge of the tentorium, causing what is known as the Kernohan notch phenomenon. Patients with uncal herniation initially may be awake, but progression to obtundation, coma, and death may occur rapidly.
The central herniation syndrome results from tumors that arise along the midline axis of the brain, especially those deep in the basal ganglia and thalamus regions. The initial signs and symptoms are due to diencephalic compression. The syndrome often first manifests with an alteration in the level of alertness and behavior. Some patients become agitated, whereas others become very drowsy. Hemisensory or hemiparetic deficits and periodic Cheyne-Stokes respirations may develop in these patients. Initially with diencephalic compression, pupils are small (1–3 mm), but as the syndrome progresses to compress the midbrain and upper pons, the pupils dilate moderately and fix at midposition (3–5 mm). As the syndrome progresses, patients become progressively lethargic and apathetic and Cushing's signs of hypertension and bradycardia may develop as a result of direct compression of the hemodynamic control nuclei within the brainstem.
Tonsillar herniation may be caused by an expanding mass in the posterior fossa. Tonsillar herniation results in the cerebellar tonsils being pushed through the foramen magnum. The syndrome is characterized by posterior headache, vomiting, stiff neck, and sometimes opisthotonic posturing. Other features may include dysconjugate eye movements and syncope with cough or sudden postural change. As a result of direct compression of the medulla and its respiratory center, irregular breathing and acute apnea may develop.
These herniation syndromes can rapidly progress from the onset of symptoms to death. They can be precipitated by medical procedures. Lumbar puncture may lead to tonsillar herniation, and ventriculostomy may result in upward herniation in which the brainstem is forced up through the tentorial notch. A high index of suspicion is required to successfully diagnose and treat this condition with emergency intubation and administration of appropriate therapy (see the section on treatment of brain tumor symptoms ).
Headache results from traction on pain-sensitive structures of the intracranial contents, including the large cerebral vessels, the dura and meninges, the venous sinuses, cranial nerves V and IX, and the second and third cervical nerve roots. Headache is the most common symptom of a brain tumor and occurs in approximately 50% of patients at some time during the course of the illness. Headache more frequently accompanies rapidly growing than slowly growing tumors. Tumors located in neurologically noneloquent brain areas such as the nondominant frontal and temporal lobes may manifest with headache as the sole clinical manifestation. The “classic” brain tumor–associated headache often is worse in the morning and lateralized to the affected side of the brain. Brain tumor–associated headache may be worsened by coughing or straining. A majority of patients with brain tumors, however, do not have these classic symptoms but instead have headaches that are deep, aching, and difficult to distinguish from tension-type headache. Headaches from posterior fossa tumors are localized to the back of the head or neck, whereas headaches from tumors of the anterior and middle cranial fossae may be referred to the forehead or eye, at times being misconstrued as a sinus headache.
Brain tumor–associated cognitive changes initially may be subtle and frequently are misdiagnosed as depression or, in the older patient, age-associated forgetfulness or early Alzheimer disease. Frontal lobe tumor location is the most common site for tumors producing these symptoms as the initial manifestation of a neoplasm.
Several other symptoms may emerge that roughly parallel cognitive decline and are of poor localizing value by themselves. Dysphagia is a common complaint, and caregivers may note that the patient with cognitive impairment seems to take a long time to chew and swallow. Oral candidiasis is a potential complicating issue in patients undergoing long-term corticosteroid therapy, and appropriate treatment should be instituted. Similarly, incontinence tends to parallel the degree of cognitive impairment. Urinary retention may occur in patients with bifrontal brain disease or with spinal cord problems. Opiate medications may exacerbate the urologic problems.
Seizures occurring for the first time in adults are more likely to be due to focal brain pathology, particularly neoplasms, than are seizures occurring in childhood. Intracranial tumors produce generalized tonic-clonic seizures, secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures, and partial, localization-related seizures. Seizures are more common in persons with cortical tumors than in persons with infratentorial or deep thalamic lesions, and they occur more often in low-grade astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, or oligoastrocytomas (60%–80%) than in high-grade gliomas (20%–40%) or cerebral metastases (15%–20%) Seizures occur at some time in 25% to 50% of patients with brain tumors. Seizure frequency may increase during radiation treatment and continue at an increased frequency for several months thereafter because of localized swelling.
Papilledema—that is, swelling of the optic nerve head with engorgement of retinal veins—usually indicates raised ICP. Currently, papilledema is seen in fewer than 20% of patients at presentation, down from 59% in the 1971 report by Huber. The development of papilledema is dependent on the location of the tumor and the rate of growth.
Vomiting with or without nausea may occur as a result of direct simulation of emetic centers in the floor of the fourth ventricle. This mechanism explains the nausea and vomiting seen with raised ICP, particularly when the rise in pressure has been rapid and is associated with hemorrhage or herniation. Patients with posterior fossa tumors frequently experience nausea and vomiting. More commonly, however, nausea is a nonlocalizing symptom, and thus the differential diagnosis must include adverse drug reactions from antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), analgesics, or other concurrent medications and gastritis from high-dose corticosteroid treatment.
Focal clinical signs of an intracranial tumor reflect the location of the mass and its associated vasogenic edema, which often is of much greater volume. This chapter does not provide a detailed discussion of every possible localizing sign but rather focuses on the general principle of neurologic localization and the specific emergent syndromes that should be recognized because of their localizing and management importance.
Disorders associated with frontal lobe lesions include early impairment of intellectual function and language function if the dominant frontal lobe is involved. Patients with bilateral frontal tumors appear to lack initiative and spontaneity—a state called abulia. Such patients may have an impaired gait with difficulty initiating walking. Personality changes include inattentiveness, apathy, depression, and the less common disinhibition and inappropriate affect leading to socially inappropriate behaviors. As tumors enlarge to involve the motor cortex, contralateral motor problems, such as hemiparesis or monoparesis, may develop.
Receptive language, auditory discrimination, and memory all are important functions of the dominant temporal lobe. Patients with nondominant temporal lobe tumors may have seizures involving visual, olfactory, or gustatory hallucinations. Deep temporal tumors may cause a contralateral visual field cut (superior quadrantanopia).
The parietal lobe is demarcated from the frontal lobe by the central sulcus. Parietal lobe functions include tactile perceptions; integration of sensory, visual, and auditory information; and visual discrimination in the inferior contralateral quadrant. When tumor involves the nondominant parietal lobe, inattention to the deficit (anosognosia) may be a prominent feature of the presentation.
Tumors in the occipital lobes cause a contralateral quadrantic or hemianopic defect, sometimes with sparing of central macular vision.
Tumors of the brainstem cause a great many focal deficits early in their course. Typically, a combination of cranial nerve palsies and long tract signs such as hemianesthesia or hemiparesis coupled with ataxia reflecting cerebellar involvement give a clue to the localization. Patients with brainstem tumors experience difficulty with swallowing and speech articulation and are at risk for aspiration.
Cerebellopontine (CP) angle tumors such as acoustic neuromas impair function of the eighth cranial nerve and produce unilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, and, later, vertigo. Involvement of adjacent cranial nerves VII and V leads to facial palsy and facial anesthesia. Later cerebellar dysfunction reflects tumor growth in this area.
Tumors of the pituitary and suprasellar region produce endocrinologic abnormalities either by hormonal production by secretory adenomas or by impingement on hypothalamic-pituitary connections. Visual defects reflect chiasmatic involvement. The most common pituitary region field defect is a bitemporal hemianopia.
Pineal region tumors (e.g., germ cell tumors, pineocytomas, pineoblastomas, gliomas of this region) may compress the aqueduct of Sylvius, causing hydrocephalus. Compression of the pretectal area produces a characteristic syndrome (Parinaud syndrome) with paralysis of upgaze, ptosis, and loss of pupillary light reflexes, along with retraction-convergence nystagmus.
Many primary tumors are capable of diffuse infiltration of the meninges . Gliomas, lymphomas, and oligodendrogliomas all may invade the subarachnoid space. They produce variable cranial nerve and spinal root dysfunction and diffuse headache, and sometimes lead to communicating hydrocephalus. Elevated levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein, low levels of CSF glucose, and positive results on cytologic studies are the diagnostic hallmarks.
On occasion, the clinician will be faced with symptoms that appear to give a clue to the patient's tumor site but in fact are false localizing symptoms . Palsies of the abducens nerve (cranial nerve VI) may reflect brainstem involvement but commonly are a nonlocalizing sign of raised (or, much less commonly, low) ICP. Ocular pain is of little localizing value because it may reflect any of the structures innervated by the first division of the fifth cranial nerve. Thus eye pain may reflect any process in the anterior or middle cranial fossa. Diplopia may result from cranial nerve invasion by brainstem or leptomeningeal tumor but also can be caused by excess levels of AEDs.
Posterior head pain may reflect posterior fossa disease but also may come from the upper cervical segments, and spinal cord tumor or caudal extension of a primary brainstem tumor should be considered if the patient reports pain in the occiput. Another sign of cervical cord disease is bilateral upper limb weakness or numbness.
Gait disorders pose another potential hazard for falsely localizing signs and symptoms. A frontal lobe gait ataxia may mimic basal ganglia or even cerebellar disease. The affected patient walks slowly, with a wide-based gait, and seems to have difficulty initiating movements. Proximal leg weakness may reflect spinal metastases from intracranial or systemic tumor, but probably the most common cause of proximal leg weakness is corticosteroid-induced myopathy.
The most immediate life-threatening syndromes are the herniation syndromes, but rapid increase in vasogenic edema also mandates aggressive treatment of evolving neurologic signs and symptoms. If the patient's condition is rapidly deteriorating, intubation and hyperventilation aiming for a pressure of carbon dioxide (P co 2 ) of 25 to 30 mm Hg are required. Mannitol is administered intravenously at a loading dose of 1 to 2 g/kg, followed by 0.5 to 1 g/kg every 6 hours as needed to control ICP. Mannitol may be transiently effective, but a rebound pressure increase sometimes develops after 24 to 48 hours. Intravenous dexamethasone at a loading dose of 10 mg followed by 4 to 10 mg every 6 hours is also appropriate initial treatment, but the full effect of corticosteroid therapy takes 24 to 72 hours. Although it is frequently given every 6 hours, dexamethasone has a long half-life and can be given in a twice-daily dosing regimen. Electrolytes and glucose levels must be monitored, and gastritis prophylaxis is required. Acute neurosurgical interventions include ICP monitoring devices and ventricular drainage or tumor decompression in patients with obstruction. Fluid management requires avoidance of hyponatremia.
Dexamethasone in doses of 8 to 40 mg per day upregulates angiopoietin 1 to stabilize the blood-brain barrier and downregulates VEGF. Controlling the edema also helps to control headache, nausea, and seizures. Because chronically raised ICP can cause visual loss, careful ophthalmologic follow-up evaluation with visual field assessment is essential. Acetazolamide therapy for symptomatic plateau waves has been useful for some patients with raised ICP from intracerebral or leptomeningeal tumor.
In the doses required to treat cerebral edema, corticosteroids produce many adverse effects that range from the easily managed gastritis symptoms and glucose intolerance to insomnia, steroid psychosis, intractable hiccoughs, and disabling myopathy. The psychosis may readily respond to reduction of the steroid dose and the addition of neuroleptic agents. Treatment of the steroid myopathy, however, will require weeks of physical therapy with attempts at steroid reduction. Anecdotal reports suggest that substitution of a nonfluorinated steroid such as methylprednisolone for fluorinated steroids such as dexamethasone may help minimize the weakness.
Many patients with brain tumors are treated with corticosteroids for prolonged periods and are thus susceptible to infection, particularly with Pneumocystis jiroveci, which carries a 50% mortality rate. Among solid tumors, primary and metastatic brain tumors have the highest rate of Pneumocystis infection, which occurs in 2% of patients and proves fatal to 40% of these patients. The mean duration of steroid therapy before infection was 7 months, with a mean dexamethasone equivalent dose of 1 to 2 mg per day. In view of these statistics, prophylaxis with one double-strength tablet of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole three times a week should be provided for patients with brain tumors during steroid administration and for 1 month afterward. Alternatives for patients who are allergic to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole include aerosolized pentamidine, dapsone, or atovaquone. Withdrawal of corticosteroids after use for more than 2 weeks may result in an adrenal insufficiency state with symptoms of lethargy, hypotension, electrolyte imbalance, arthralgias, and diffuse weakness. Chronic glucocorticoid supplementation with hydrocortisone, 10 to 20 mg per day, is essential for these patients. A VEGF inhibitor such as bevacizumab or cediranib may provide an alternative treatment for controlling peritumoral edema.
Neurooncologists often find themselves working closely with epileptologists as they seek to control seizures with minimal adverse effects. Because patients with brain tumors frequently require corticosteroids, analgesics, anxiolytics, and antiemetics, drug-drug interactions make the management of epilepsy complex.
The potential interaction of AEDs with other medications required for patients who have a brain tumor has led to reconsideration of the prophylactic use of antiseizure drugs. Cytochrome P450 enzyme–inducing drugs such as phenytoin and carbamazepine are now used less frequently because of their side effects.
A rash develops in approximately 20% of patients with gliomas who are treated with phenytoin or carbamazepine and cranial irradiation; the most serious and sometimes life-threatening reaction, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, occurs in a few patients. Treatment is controversial, but often the corticosteroid dose is doubled as AEDs are withdrawn abruptly.
In view of all of the potential hazards of AEDs, it is worthwhile to consider whether their prophylactic use is justified in the brain tumor population with several studies showing mixed results regarding efficacy. For all of these reasons, a practice parameter published by the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology concluded that no benefit could be established for routine prophylactic use of AEDs in patients with brain tumors. However, the advent of AEDs that do not induce hepatic enzymes has recently caused some neurologists to reconsider prophylactic use of seizure medicines in high-risk patients, particularly those with hemorrhagic metastases, such as patients with melanoma.
Of the newer agents, levetiracetam (Keppra) has emerged as a first line antiepileptic agent in patients with brain tumors. Its therapeutic window is wider than that of phenytoin, as the level is not affected by chemotherapy drugs, and it does not alter the metabolism of any chemotherapeutic agents. Transitioning from phenytoin to levetiracetam in glioma-related seizures did not elicit significant differences in seizure freedom, suggesting safety in switching to levetiracetam. However, the clinician must be familiar with some adverse effects specific to these drugs (summarized in Table 63.4 ) to be able to diagnose symptoms accurately, eliminate the offending drug, and avoid unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. One of the most common adverse side effects of levetiracetam is irritability and aggression. Lacosamide is an alternative first-line or add-on therapy to levetiracetam with similar efficacy. Use of lacosamide as monotherapy or in combination with levetiracetam may be considered in patients who are experiencing adverse side effects.
Drug | Potential Adverse Effect(s) |
---|---|
Oxcarbazepine | Hyponatremia (confusion, seizures) |
Gabapentin | Sedation, ataxia, weight gain |
Depakote | Weight gain, platelet dysfunction |
Topiramate | Memory and word-finding problems, weight loss |
Zonisamide | Sedation |
Levetiracetam | Psychosis, irritability, lethargy |
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is extremely common in patients with brain tumors, with a reported incidence of 28% to 45%. The risk is greatest in the postoperative period and in patients with hemiplegia.
For prophylaxis, low-molecular-weight heparin drugs have a good safety profile in the neurosurgical population. Prophylaxis with enoxaparin, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously daily, plus use of external compression stockings has been found to be superior to the use of compression stockings alone for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after neurosurgery.
Patients with brain tumors who have diagnosed DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE) will often receive inferior vena cava filters to prevent further thromboembolic complications. However, retrospective studies have demonstrated a low risk of hemorrhage relative to a 60% rate of complications. Complications included PE, filter thrombosis, and postphlebitic syndrome.
Although no absolute guidelines are available, most neurosurgeons would be reluctant to institute full anticoagulation in these patients within 2 weeks of surgery. Because most primary and secondary brain tumors pose a continuing risk of thromboembolism, lifelong anticoagulation is recommended.
No clear-cut guidelines exist for the use of direct thrombin inhibitors in patients with brain tumors, and the lack of agents to reverse anticoagulation is a drawback in this population of patients who may need urgent surgical intervention. However, the recent development of new reversal agents may lead to changes in practice patterns, given the inherent decreased risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct thrombin inhibitors.
MRI is the study of choice for evaluating brain tumors. The increased tissue contrast resolution provides exquisite anatomic definition, which is accentuated after administration of gadolinium contrast material. Therefore when possible, MRI sequences should be performed before and after administration of contrast material. Much like with the use of iodinated contrast material in computed tomography (CT) imaging, tumor-related disruption of the blood-brain barrier allows interstitial leakage of contrast material, and depending on scanning parameters, it may appear as increased (spin echo T1) or decreased (gradient echo imaging) signal. Gadolinium enhancement can be crucial in identifying leptomeningeal disease, which appears as thickened, enhancing areas of the dura and leptomeninges. The absence of bony artifacts common with CT has enabled MRI to provide exceptional information regarding brain tumors, particularly in the posterior fossa. In addition, localization of the lesion is precise because MRI is usually reconstructed in three orthogonal planes.
Multiple sequences may be obtained from the MRI scans, highlighting different properties of both brain and tumor. Of particular interest are the T2-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. These sequences highlight tumor-related vasogenic edema and nonenhancing portions of the tumor, which appear as areas of increased T2 signal compared with normal brain. Evaluating this signal pattern is very important in assessing the degree of mass effect, because the increased signal may represent the true limits of a glial tumor, as tumor cells are invariably present in the nonenhancing tissue surrounding the enhancing component. This phenomenon provides the rationale for extending the irradiated zone in standard external beam radiation therapy to include the edematous volume of brain plus a margin. The presence of an edema pattern extending into the corpus callosum implies direct tumor invasion into the corpus callosum. The extremely compact fiber tracts passing through the corpus callosum impede passage of edematous fluid, and thus any increased T2 signal that is present is likely created by tumor infiltration. This point is very important to keep in mind in assessing the extent of tumor.
Endothelial proliferation with neovascularity is a hallmark of malignancy in brain neoplasms. Both MRI and CT perfusion imaging can be performed in combination with conventional MRI examinations to determine the extent of neovascularity. The correlation between relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and grade of malignant glioma appears to be very good. Perfusion imaging with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI is especially helpful in distinguishing grade III from grade IV malignant gliomas, but it can also be used to distinguish gliomas from other neoplasms such as intracranial metastases ( Fig. 63.3 ). It has been shown that anaplastic astrocytomas that enhance have a higher vascularity index than do nonenhancing anaplastic astrocytomas. Perfusion imaging may enable monitoring of the antiangiogenic effects of treatment in brain tumors. Furthermore, perfusion imaging is also useful in determining vascularity in benign tumors such as meningiomas, a phenomenon that may be associated with disease progression.
Functional MRI techniques have been used to identify areas of brain activity in real time, which is quite useful in identifying regions of eloquent brain adjacent to tumors. By identifying language and motor areas adjacent to tumors, one can determine the extent of surgical resection that can be carried out while attempting to preserve functional activity. It is now possible to import functional MRI images into frameless stereotactic units that are used for intraoperative surgical planning. Through use of discrete motor, sensory, language, or visual paradigms, the functional activity of relevant cortical brain can be imaged. One limitation to functional MRI scanning is its inability to identify subcortical white matter tracts adjacent to the gray matter activated by the investigated activity. For this reason, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is increasingly being used to map subcortical white matter tracts. It has been shown that combining DTI with conventional anatomic images of the lesion of interest facilitates extended resection of tumor while preserving function.
A great deal of interest has centered on the capability of clinical MRI scanners to perform magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to evaluate molecular components of a defined voxel within the brain tissue. Today's smaller voxel sizes allow a much greater degree of selectivity in evaluating components of a tumor. MRS of malignant gliomas has been evaluated extensively, and the presence or absence of five metabolites provides the most useful information. N -acetylaspartate (NAA) is a marker of healthy neurons, whereas increases in choline are associated with high cellular turnover. Creatine serves as an internal marker and is related to the energy state of the tumor. A lipid peak indicates the presence of necrosis and suggests higher-grade malignancy, whereas lactate indicates the presence of hypoxia. Malignant gliomas exhibit a higher choline peak relative to creatine and a lower NAA peak relative to choline, with increasing grade of malignancy ( Fig. 63.4 ). Lipid and lactate peaks, which also constitute markers of malignancy, can be seen both in primary gliomas and in metastatic tumors. MRS can help determine whether an enhancing region in a previously treated tumor bed represents active tumor or radiation necrosis. MRS is also used to monitor treatment effects over an extended period.
MRI has the capability to specifically identify vascular structures. As noninvasive techniques, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and magnetic resonance venography can be useful in evaluating major vessels at the base of the skull in preparation for surgical treatment of skull base tumors.
A CT scan usually is the first study obtained in a patient with a neurologic complaint. In part because of its extensive availability and rapid acquisition times, CT provides a robust screening tool. Hemorrhagic lesions can be seen as a result of the increased density of extravasated blood products in comparison with surrounding tissues. Infarcts manifest acutely as edematous hypodense tissue and can be confused with tumors, especially low-grade gliomas, which may not enhance with contrast agents. However, cytotoxic edema associated with infarcts often involves both gray and white matter, whereas vasogenic edema as a result of the presence of tumor predominately involves the white matter. Iodinated contrast agents may be useful to differentiate tumor from the surrounding edematous brain tissue because disruption of the blood-brain barrier permits leakage of the contrast agent into the interstitial space. The pattern of ring enhancement of tumors may be difficult to distinguish from the ring enhancement of a cerebral abscess, although brain tumors are far more common than brain abscesses in the United States. Infarcted brain tissue may also enhance after administration of contrast material. This finding is most common 2 to 3 weeks after a stroke, and thus clinical history should complement image interpretation.
CT has limitations in evaluating structures near the irregular bony surfaces of the skull base because of volume averaging and streak artifact. This limitation makes interpretation in and around the skull base and in the posterior fossa (the region between the tentorium and the foramen magnum) difficult. Nevertheless, CT is the study of choice in patients who cannot undergo MRI, such as patients with claustrophobia, implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, or other metal devices that preclude imaging with MRI.
WHO grade I (pilocytic) astrocytomas show enhancement on CT and MRI scans. By contrast, WHO grade II astrocytomas typically are poorly defined, hypodense, or isodense lesions on CT scans and do not enhance. Either localized or homogeneous enhancement, however, can be seen in up to 30% to 40% of cases, with calcification in 5% to 10% of cases. MRI shows low signal intensity on T1-weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images ( Fig. 63.5A–B ). Grade III anaplastic astrocytomas and grade IV glioblastomas typically enhance with contrast, although in one study, enhancement was not seen in 40% of the former and in 4% of the latter (see Fig. 63.5C–D ) The region of enhancement typically has a ringlike appearance surrounding an area of necrosis. The perimeter of the enhancing region does not define the border of the tumor, and malignant cells may be present beyond this perimeter. T2-weighted MRI images show abnormalities that are more extensive than those seen on a contrast-enhanced CT scan or a T1-weighted MRI scan. In one study in which stereotactic biopsy findings were correlated with radiologic findings in patients with gliomas, isolated tumor cells often were found as far away as the region showing increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. Perfusion MRI can measure rCBV and cerebral blood flow, which can be used to determine tumor grade and to assess progression after treatment.
At least 50% of oligodendrogliomas show calcifications, which can be appreciated on plain films of the skull and on CT scans. Enhancement of oligodendrogliomas can be seen on CT and MRI scans but is often mild and poorly defined.
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging uses a radioactive isotope analogue of glucose, fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), to image glucose metabolism. Because glucose is the sole fuel for brain tissue, this metabolic imaging allows visualization of brain physiology. Because glioblastomas, untreated PCNSL, oligodendrogliomas, and malignant meningiomas have increased glucose metabolism compared with normal brain tissue, these tumors have greater FDG avidity and will be PET positive. Anaplastic astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, meningiomas, and metastatic tumors show variable FDG uptake ( Fig. 63.6 ), whereas low-grade gliomas and radiation necrosis show little to no FDG uptake. PET imaging using targeted tracers, such as the somatostatin-receptor ligand gallium-68 DOTATOC in meningiomas, might be more useful for tumors in which FDG is too variable for accurate delineation.
Complicating assessment of chemotherapy in patients with a brain tumor is the observation that corticosteroids also often reduce MRI contrast enhancement and relieve symptoms, making it difficult to distinguish chemotherapy effects from corticosteroid effects. For almost 20 years, standard response criteria have been the Macdonald criteria, which use two-dimensional measurements of enhancing tumor and account for corticosteroid use and clinical status. However, it has been recognized that reliance on contrast enhancement is a limitation in many anaplastic gliomas. Two situations in particular have led to the development of a new set of response criteria (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, or RANO). First, pseudoprogression is defined as an increase in contrast enhancement or edema on MRI without true tumor progression, a phenomenon made more common by the addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy. The first postradiation MRI image shows increased contrast enhancement in up to 50% of patients ( Fig. 63.7 ), in half of whom the enhancement eventually subsides. The phenomenon may be asymptomatic but can also cause neurologic decline. Failure to recognize pseudoprogression may cause the physician to prematurely terminate effective therapy. Second, pseudoregression refers to a decrease in contrast enhancement on MRI without true response, a phenomenon increasingly seen in patients treated with VEGF pathway antiangiogenic agents. Infiltrative tumor may be distinguished from radiation-related FLAIR and T2 signal MRI changes by diffusion-weighted MRI sequences that show diffusion restriction in areas infiltrated by neoplastic cells.
Some of the important features of the updated RANO criteria that are just now being implemented in clinical trials include precise definitions of measurable disease, exclusion of patients within the first 3 months after radiotherapy from clinical trials to avoid confounding chemotherapy failure with pseudoprogression, and inclusion of stable or decreased nonenhancing disease as a criterion for tumor response in patients who have received antiangiogenic therapy.
Similarly, confusion may arise when neuroimaging documents enlargement of a mass after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) that may progress over many months. Because PET scanning may not reliably distinguish radiation necrosis from tumor progression, the results of concurrent chemotherapy may be ambiguous. Multicentric recurrence outside original radiation fields and after temozolomide appears to be more common when patients have positive O -methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status.
Lumbar punctures are not commonly used for the diagnosis of brain tumors owing to the low yield of the procedure in primary gliomas. Leptomeningeal seeding from supratentorial malignant gliomas is usually an end-stage finding. Once life-threatening conditions such as mass effect have been excluded, lumbar puncture may be performed for confirmation of leptomeningeal disease. Lumbar puncture remains part of the staging workup for some primary brain tumors, such as medulloblastoma and CNS lymphoma.
The successful resection of a brain tumor requires removing the tumor while minimizing injury to the surrounding normal brain. The approach to removal of brain tumors follows the mantra of real estate agents: “location, location, location.” Deep tumors that are in noneloquent regions of brain can be easily accessed and removed, whereas superficial tumors may not be easily resectable because of their location within extremely eloquent brain tissue.
The goals of surgery are to (1) establish the histology of the lesion, which is frequently better achieved via surgical resection over stereotactic biopsy because greater tissue sampling reduces the risk of sampling error; (2) debulk the mass effect of the tumor to correct a neurologic deficit and to prevent imminent death in patients with large tumors and early herniation syndromes; and (3) achieve surgical cure when possible (as in WHO I gliomas) or, when the lesion is infiltrative and surgical cure is impossible, to debulk the tumor to increase the efficacy of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, which produce the best response rate when they are used with minimal tumor burden.
The most common presenting manifestations in patients with glioma are headache and seizures. Debulking large tumors will reduce dural stretch, thus decreasing headaches. The incidence of seizures in patients with malignant gliomas can be decreased by at least 75% with attempts at gross total resection. Recovery from other neurologic deficits such as hemiparesis, visual field loss, or aphasia will depend on whether the deficit is due to mass effect or due to infiltration and damage to neural tracts.
Another rationale for maximal debulking is to reduce the cellular burden in order to increase efficacy of both radiation therapy and chemotherapy following resection. Extent of resection in primary glial tumors has been found to correlate with survival.
Radiation is commonly used to treat many different types of brain tumors. The radiation oncologist must decide on many factors in the treatment plan for an individual patient, including treatment volume, dose, fractionation, and normal tissue constraints. Treatment techniques including three-dimensional conformal therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy are being used in a majority of patients with brain tumors. Proton therapy, which is increasingly available in the United States, may be used for specific cases, especially for pediatric brain tumors and for tumors at the base of the skull. Heavy ion therapy, such as with carbon ions, is used in a few centers worldwide.
Treatment planning starts with a review of the MRI scan to identify the target volumes. The appropriate volume to be irradiated varies according to the tumor type. Most brain tumors including gliomas and meningiomas are treated with focal radiation to the lesion plus a margin. The actual abnormality seen on imaging studies is termed the gross tumor volume (GTV). Additional tissue surrounding the GTV that is thought to potentially contain tumor cells is included in the clinical target volume (CTV). For some tumors such as glioblastoma, which can be highly infiltrative, the CTV includes the area of edema as demonstrated on the FLAIR or T2 sequences plus up to a 2.5-cm margin. For other tumors that do not infiltrate, such as meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, acoustic neuromas, and craniopharyngiomas, the CTV typically would be much tighter than that used for glioblastomas. An additional volume is included around the CTV to take into account day-to-day setup error and to allow for buildup of dose, resulting in the planning target volume (PTV).
Treatment planning begins with CT simulation of the patient with appropriate immobilization devices. Fig. 63.8 shows thermoplastic mask and bite-block immobilization devices. A previously obtained MRI image or an MRI image obtained at the time of simulation may be fused with the CT images in the treatment planning system to facilitate better target volume delineation. Computerized treatment planning is then used to generate radiation beam angles, blocks, and dose distributions.
Most brain tumors are treated with focal radiation therapy, and often brain metastases and some leukemias and lymphomas require whole-brain radiotherapy; however, for some tumors, such as primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) and metastatic germ cell tumors of the CNS, it may be necessary to include the entire craniospinal axis in the irradiated zone. Proton therapy for craniospinal irradiation has the advantage of reducing dose to the vertebral bodies and essentially eliminating the exit dose through the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. E-Fig. 63.1 shows sample treatment plans for craniospinal irradiation using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy, and proton beam techniques.
Stereotactic radiotherapy is a technique for delivering high-dose radiation to a target volume with very tight margins, thereby sparing surrounding normal tissues. This technique can be implemented with various devices, including (1) a Gamma Knife machine, which, depending on the model, typically contains 192 or 201 fixed cobalt-60 sources that converge to a single point; (2) a conventional linear accelerator (“linac”) outfitted with additional hardware so it can deliver focused radiation, generally with three to five arcs; (3) CyberKnife, which is a radiosurgery system composed of a linac mounted on a robot and directed under image guidance; and (4) delivery of charged particles such as protons, which, because of their physical properties, deposit energy in a narrower region than is possible with x-rays.
Stereotactic radiation can be delivered in a single large fraction; this technique is termed stereotactic radiosurgery , although no surgery is performed. A stereotactic head frame often is screwed to the skull. The head frame permits three-dimensional localization and immobilization of the head during treatment, thereby allowing delivery of radiation with precision to a very tightly defined volume defined with MRI imaging. The usual dose of single-fraction radiation used in SRS ranges from 12 to 24 Gy and is based on the histologic tumor type and the volume of tissue irradiated. The doses used are based on the likelihood of tumor control and the risk of development of radiation necrosis.
Stereotactic radiotherapy also can be delivered in a fractionated regimen over several days or weeks. CyberKnife does not require the use of a head frame but instead uses real-time image tracking while patients are immobilized with a face mask.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy uses multiple segmented fields with inverse treatment planning algorithms. In addition to defining the doses to be delivered to the GTV and CTV, dose constraints are placed on normal structures to limit their radiation exposure. Constraints include the maximum or mean dose to the entire structure, limits to a portion of the structure, and the maximum point dose within the structure. The most common mechanism of delivering this dose is use of multiple fields, typically five to nine, with use of a specialized blocking apparatus called a multileaf collimator to divide each field into multiple beamlets. From 50 to more than 100 beamlets may be used.
The delivery of charged particles, primarily protons, has been used to treat brain tumors. The potential benefit of protons is the result of their physical properties, which are different from those of photons. The advantage of proton radiation therapy compared with photon radiation therapy is the reduction of the total dose to the patient as a result of the absence of an exit dose. This attribute results in a decreased dose to the normal part of the brain, which may decrease acute and long-term toxicities, which is particularly important in pediatric patients.
A variety of adverse effects may occur after irradiation of the CNS (reviewed by Schultheiss and associates ). These effects can be divided into acute, which occur during the treatment; delayed early, which occur within a few months of radiation; and late, which occur months to years later.
Acute effects of cranial irradiation include fatigue, nausea, headaches, anorexia, and alopecia. Patients may experience nausea within hours after the administration of the radiation and headaches during the course of treatment. Nausea and headaches are thought to be caused by radiation-induced edema and can be ameliorated with corticosteroids. Nausea usually is well controlled with antiemetics such as ondansetron, granisetron, or prochlorperazine. In patients receiving craniospinal radiation, the nausea and anorexia may be compounded by radiation that the upper gastrointestinal tract receives as an exit dose from the spinal field. Hair loss generally starts after the scalp has received 20 to 30 Gy. It usually is not permanent, but regrowth of hair may take months, and the new hair often is thinner than the original hair or even of a different color. In areas that receive a high dose of radiation, especially with tangentially directed fields, alopecia may be permanent. Other acute adverse effects of cranial irradiation may include accumulation of cerumen in the ear canals and serous otitis media.
The most common delayed early effect from radiation is the somnolence syndrome, which is characterized by excessive drowsiness, nausea, and irritability. If this syndrome occurs, it generally does so 1 to 3 months after radiation has been completed. This syndrome is thought to be due to transient, diffuse demyelination. It usually is seen after whole-brain irradiation but also can develop after limited-field irradiation. The syndrome resolves spontaneously, but steroids can shorten its duration. Delayed early effects occurring after cranial irradiation can also take the form of focal neurologic signs due to intralesional reactions related to tumor response or perilesional reactions related to edema or demyelination.
The pathophysiology of late effects from CNS irradiation is poorly understood. Some of the effects may be caused by degenerative changes in the supporting glial cells, whereas others may be caused by vascular changes due to endothelial cell loss and capillary occlusion. The clinical and imaging manifestations of these changes may include cognitive deficits and neurobehavioral changes, pituitary-hypothalamic dysfunction, and brain necrosis.
One of the most serious late effects of cranial irradiation is brain necrosis, which may cause significant and persistent neurologic injury. Histopathologic changes seen in radiation necrosis include coagulative and liquefactive necrosis, mostly in white matter, and associated endothelial thickening, vascular hyalinization, fibrinoid deposition, and calcification. It may produce progressive cerebral edema and mass effect requiring prolonged corticosteroid use or surgery. Radiation necrosis may be confused with tumor growth, resulting in the inappropriate use of antitumor therapies. The onset of radiation necrosis includes behavioral changes, such as lethargy and dementia, headache and papilledema, and seizure. Clinical signs and symptoms are usually identified 2 to 3 years after irradiation, although confirmed cases have been detected as early as 9 months and as late as 16 years after completion of radiation therapy. The signs and symptoms are strongly related to the site of radiation necrosis; however, the most common clinical signs are focal motor deficits.
Accurate data regarding the incidence of brain necrosis based on CT and MRI findings come from a randomized trial of irradiation for low-grade gliomas. In this study, the 2-year actuarial incidence of brain necrosis was 2.5% for patients receiving 50.4 Gy and 5% for those receiving 64.8 Gy. A retrospective review of 426 patients treated for glioma with radiation found that radionecrosis developed in 4.9% of patients. The risk of necrosis increased with longer survival and with increasing dose of radiation. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased risk of radiation necrosis.
Often radiation necrosis is difficult to distinguish from recurrent tumor with CT or MRI, which may show increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images and contrast enhancement on T1-weighted images. As discussed earlier in the section on diagnostic imaging, PET scanning with FDG may help distinguish viable tumor from necrotic tissue. Advanced MRI techniques may also help differentiate tumor from necrosis. On MRS, NAA is significantly reduced in patients with radiation necrosis, whereas changes in choline and creatine are more variable. A high choline level is more consistent with disease progression, whereas a decreased creatine level is generally associated with radiation injury. Ratios of metabolites are considered, and pooling ratios of different metabolites may be helpful in differentiating tumor from necrosis. Perfusion imaging techniques that measure rCBV may also help differentiate recurrence from necrosis by allowing for indirect assessment of tumor angiogenesis and vascularity. Hyperperfusion is seen with tumor recurrence, and necrosis is associated with ischemia-related change. Still, rCBV may be increased in areas of radiation-induced inflammation. Advanced MRI techniques of late radiation-induced injury are reviewed by Pružincová and colleagues.
Management of radiation necrosis may be either medical or surgical. Corticosteroids may counteract the vascular endothelial damage and also decrease the inflammatory response. Other therapies, such as hyperbaric oxygen, anticoagulants, and vitamins have met with varying degrees of success, and no large trials have been conducted to support their use. A promising therapy for brain necrosis is the anti-VEGF agent bevacizumab, which may result in decreased vessel permeability. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 14 patients with CNS radiation necrosis showed that patients receiving the antibody demonstrated a radiographic response, whereas those treated with placebo did not demonstrate a response. Important to note, all patients treated with bevacizumab showed clinical improvement. Surgical exploration often is necessary not only to establish a diagnosis but also as a therapeutic intervention to reduce mass effect and edema. This results in clinical improvement in the majority of patients.
Neurocognitive deficits often are observed after cranial irradiation, especially in young children. Many of the sequelae appear several years after treatment of children with brain tumors, which mandates long-term follow-up. Sequential assessments of neurocognitive function demonstrated progressive deterioration during 6 years after radiotherapy in children with ALL who were treated with 18 Gy of whole-brain irradiation. Numerous studies of neurocognitive function in children after whole-brain irradiation for ALL have been performed. In summary, these findings show that whole-brain irradiation can lead to decline in neurocognitive function, an effect that appears to be greater in younger children and with higher doses of radiation (e.g., 24 Gy) but can be seen after treatment with 18 Gy. It also is possible that an interaction between methotrexate (intrathecal or high-dose systemic) and whole-brain irradiation causes these late effects. In one study, serial intelligence quotient (IQ) examinations were used to follow 44 pediatric patients with medulloblastoma who were treated with postoperative radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. At a mean of 5.2 years from completion of radiotherapy, the mean estimated full-scale IQ was greater than one standard deviation below the expected population norm, and a mean loss of 2.55 estimated full-scale IQ points occurred per year. This study suggests that the decline in IQ was not because of a loss of previously known skills and information, but rather an inability to acquire new skills and information at a rate comparable with healthy control subjects.
In a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) randomized study of a dose of 64.8 versus 50.4 Gy for treatment of low-grade gliomas, data regarding cognitive performance were collected prospectively. With a median follow-up time of 7.4 years in survivors, the vast majority of patients with normal baseline findings on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) maintained normal findings after undergoing radiotherapy. Patients with abnormal MMSE results before radiotherapy were more likely to have an improvement in cognitive abilities than deterioration after being treated with radiotherapy. Armstrong and coworkers conducted prospective, comprehensive, longitudinal neuropsychologic testing on 26 adult patients with low-grade supratentorial brain tumors, mostly gliomas, who had been treated with radiotherapy. Nine patients underwent testing 6 years after being treated with radiotherapy. No declines were noted on most neurocognitive tests. Results in 7 of the 37 neuropsychologic tests showed improvement over 6 years. However, declines emerged only after 5 years on selected tests of cognitive function such as visual memory.
Some evidence indicates that adults treated with brain radiotherapy may experience long-term cognitive sequelae. One study aimed to differentiate causes of cognitive disability—either the tumor itself or various treatments, including radiotherapy, surgery, or medication—in a population of patients with a low-grade glioma at a mean of 6 years from diagnosis. Their findings suggest that the tumor had the greatest deleterious effect on cognitive functioning and that radiotherapy resulted in long-term cognitive disability mostly when high doses per fraction (>2 Gy) were used. An update of this study, which assessed cognitive abnormalities at a mean of 12 years after diagnosis, showed that patients who were treated with radiation therapy had greater deficits than did control subjects who did not undergo radiotherapy. The patients who underwent radiation therapy had more deficits in attention functioning at follow-up, regardless of fraction dose, and they also performed worse in tests of executive functioning and information processing speed.
Data regarding treatment of these cognitive deficits in brain tumor survivors are limited and conflicting. In a randomized trial of 83 childhood survivors of ALL or malignant brain tumors who had problems with academic achievement, the use of methylphenidate was investigated, and it was revealed that the drug at least temporarily reduced some attentional and social deficits. However, a phase III placebo-controlled trial in patients with a brain tumor failed to show that prophylactic use of methylphenidate improved quality of life or cognitive function. A phase II trial of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil in patients who received radiation for brain tumors showed improved cognitive functioning, mood, and health-related quality of life after a 24-week course of the drug. Cranial transplantation of human stem cells is a treatment currently under investigation in the laboratory. Radiation-induced depletion of stem cells in the brain, especially in the area of the hippocampus, may be partially responsible for radiation-induced cognitive deficits. Using rats subjected to cranial irradiation, researchers have transplanted human embryonic stem cells or human neural stem cells into the hippocampal formations. Animals receiving stem cells showed superior performance on hippocampal-dependent cognitive tasks.
Young age also is an important risk factor for leukoencephalopathy, which can affect all age groups. Histologically, multifocal white matter destruction with loss of myelin can be seen, especially in the periventricular regions; MRI scans show these periventricular abnormalities. CT scans also may reveal the presence of intracerebral microcalcifications due to mineralizing microangiopathy. The clinical expression of leukoencephalopathy ranges from mild evidence of white matter injury on neuroimaging studies to severe necrotizing leukoencephalopathy with profound neurologic impairment and, in some cases, death. Mild or subclinical cases are more common than severe necrotizing leukoencephalopathy. The bulk of the experience comes from children who received 24 Gy of whole-brain radiation along with high doses of intravenous and intrathecal methotrexate. The frequency of leukoencephalopathy is low in patients who receive cranial radiotherapy and intrathecal methotrexate or cranial irradiation and intravenous methotrexate but may be as high as 45% in patients who receive all three treatments. In general, methotrexate is most toxic when given during or after radiation.
Cranial irradiation can result in arterial vascular problems such as vessel obliteration or narrowing, resulting in a strokelike syndrome. These complications are rare, but when they occur they are more likely to happen after irradiation of the parasellar region.
Endocrine problems are common after cranial irradiation, particularly in children. Such problems include growth hormone (GH) deficiency and thyroid and gonadal dysfunction.
The hypothalamus is more radiosensitive than the pituitary gland and is responsible for endocrine dysfunction at lower doses. At higher doses (>40 Gy), however, both the anterior pituitary gland and the hypothalamus contribute to endocrine dysfunction. Of all the hormones, GH is the most likely to show deficiency after irradiation and is seen in a majority of children who have received whole-brain irradiation. One study found that in children with ALL who received a dose of 24 Gy to the whole brain, 56% experienced GH deficiency, whereas no such problems were seen in children who received a dose of 18 Gy, at least 4 years later. The latency of onset is dose dependent and is shorter with higher doses. Growth may be further impaired by spinal irradiation, which directly affects the vertebral body growth center.
Precocious puberty may occur after relatively low doses, on the order of 18 Gy. Deficiencies in other hormones, such as gonadotropins, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), are rare after doses lower than 40 Gy. Thyroid dysfunction is common in patients with brain tumors who are treated with high-dose radiotherapy. Constine and associates studied endocrine function in 32 patients with brain tumors not involving the hypothalamic-pituitary region who received 39.6 to 70.2 Gy to this region. Hypothalamic or pituitary hypothyroidism developed in 65% of the patients. Fourteen of 23 postpubertal patients (61%) had evidence of hypogonadism manifesting with oligomenorrhea, low estradiol levels, or low testosterone levels. Half of the patients had mild hyperprolactinemia. Subtle abnormalities in adrenal function were seen in 35% of patients.
In patients receiving craniospinal radiation, hypothyroidism also may occur as a result of the exit dose to the thyroid gland. In one study, the incidence of hypothyroidism was 15% or 33% ( P = .013), respectively, for patients receiving cranial or craniospinal irradiation. The mean spinal dose was 29 Gy, and the exit dose to the thyroid gland ranged from 10 to 15 Gy.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here