Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Patients with localized (i.e., T1–T2) prostate cancer (PCa) have better outcomes if there is local tumor control, even in the presence of high-risk features (e.g., prostate-specific antigen, PSA >20 ng/mL; Gleason score, GS 8–10). Treatment options for localized PCa typically include radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy, which is delivered either as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; typically, dose-escalated conventionally fractionated RT (CFRT) ) or brachytherapy (BT). In this chapter, we discuss the use of BT for PCa.
Briefly, low dose rate (LDR; defined as ≤2 Gy/h, and typically much less in practice) BT for PCa consists of the permanent deposition of sealed sources (i.e., “seeds”) in the prostate including the tumor. High dose rate (HDR; defined as ≥12 Gy/h) BT consists of temporary robotic source insertion and computer guidance to optimize dose distribution. EBRT (to a lower dose than dose-escalated CFRT; or as hypofractionated RT (HFRT)) combined with either type of BT (i.e., “LDR-BT boost,” “HDR-BT boost,” respectively) is hypothesized to further improve local control and patient outcomes among certain intermediate- and high-risk patients. For reference, the typical fractionation schedules of EBRT (both CFRT and HFRT), LDR-BT, HDR-BT, and BT boost are illustrated in Figure 44.1 .
In this chapter, we discuss the history of BT, the technical aspects and sequencing of BT (with respect to EBRT), the clinical outcomes of BT, and the follow-up after BT. Within each section, we address LDR-BT and HDR-BT separately. Although there are many standard treatment options for PCa, randomized clinical trials to define the optimal therapy for patients with localized disease are limited. BT and BT boost may be used as first-line therapies in the management of PCa patients of all National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined risk groups, as listed in Table 44.1 . Before treatment, all patients require a biopsy Gleason score, pretherapy serum PSA, and clinical tumor classification, as these prognostic factors determine low-, intermediate-, or high-risk classification. The contraindications to BT are listed in Table 44.2 . Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may be used with either form of BT, in certain intermediate- and high-risk patients (also listed in Table 44.1 ).
Options and subtypes | NCCN risk group | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Low Gleason score < 6, and PSA <10 ng/mL, and clinical tumor classification, T1, T2a | Intermediate Gleason score 7, or, PSA > 10 ng/mL < 20 ng/mL, or clinical tumor classification of T2b, T2c | High Gleason score 8–10, or, PSA >20 ng/mL, or clinical tumor classification of T3a | ||
RP | Open, laparoscopic, robotic approaches | Monotherapy | Monotherapy | Monotherapy |
BT | LDR | Monotherapy or boost | Monotherapy or boost | Boost > monotherapy |
HDR | Monotherapy | Boost * monotherapy |
Boost * Monotherapy (infrequently) |
|
EBRT | CFRT | Monotherapy > boost | Monotherapy or boost | Monotherapy or boost |
HFRT | * Monotherapy > * boost | * Monotherapy > * boost | * Monotherapy> * boost | |
SBRT | * Monotherapy | * Monotherapy (infrequently) | * Monotherapy (infrequently) | |
± ADT | No | Sometimes, for 4–6 m | Almost always, for 24–36 m |
* Denotes treatment options that are largely investigational.
Contraindications | |
---|---|
Absolute | Limited life expectancy (e.g., <10 years) |
Unacceptable operative risks, or medically unsuited for anesthesia | |
Distant metastases | |
Absence of rectum such that TRUS guidance is precluded | |
Large TURP defects which preclude seed placement and acceptable radiation dosimetry | |
Ataxia telangiectasia | |
Pre-existing rectal fistula | |
Relative | High IPSS score (typically defined as >20) |
History of prior pelvic radiotherapy | |
TURP defects | |
Large median lobes | |
Gland size >60 cm 3 at time of implantation | |
Inflammatory bowel disease | |
Patient peak flow rate <10 cm 3 /s and post void residual volume prior to BT >100 cm 3 | |
Pubic arch interference (e.g., prior pelvic fracture, irregular pelvic anatomy, or a penile prosthesis) |
In 1917, the first report of brachytherapy for PCa was published. In the 1950s, LDR-BT was performed with 198 Au. By the 1970s, 125 I seeds were used for prostate implants. However, the dose distribution of these isotopes and clinical outcomes were not ideal. The application of a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to guide LDR-BT was successful in Denmark and the United States in the 1980s. TRUS-guided LDR-BT became a standard technique in the United States in the 1990s because it had improved outcomes and was less invasive when compared to laparotomy-based approaches. LDR-BT has been endorsed for low-risk PCa by organizations including the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the American Cancer Society (ACS), the NCCN, and the American Urologic Association (AUA.)
The disadvantages of LDR-BT include possible seed migration (for loose seeds), high dependence on the operator skill for proper seed placement, permanent deposition of radioactive material in the body, inability to adjust seeds once they are deposited, inability to deliver high doses over a short period of time, variability of dosimetry among implants, and exposure of the staff to radiation. These disadvantages led physicians to explore other BT systems (i.e., HDR-BT) ( Table 44.3 .).
BT type | Radionuclide | Half-life (days) | Avg. energy (keV) | Years introduced | Typical monotherapy seed strength | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mCi) | (mCi) | |||||
LDR-BT | Iodine-125 | 59.4 | 28.4 | 1965 | 0.3–0.6 | 0.4–0.8 |
Palladium-103 | 17.0 | 20.7 | 1986 | 1.1–2.2 | 1.4–2.8 | |
Cesium-131 | 9.7 | 30.4 | 2004 | 2.5–3.9 | 1.6–2.5 | |
HDR-BT | Iridium-192 | 73.8 | 380 | 1980 | – | – |
A TRUS-guided remote afterloading system (RALS) was first introduced in 1980 to deliver a high radiation dose to the prostate and helped address some limitations of LDR-BT. HDR-BT was first used as a boost with EBRT in Sweden, Germany, and the United States in the 1980s and 1990s. HDR-BT was shown to be safe and effective in Phase I/II trials. In Osaka, Japan, a systematic treatment series of HDR-BT boost was started in 1994. After a year of using HDR-BT boost, a trial of HDR-BT monotherapy was initiated. Subsequently, the Osaka group published the first report on HDR-BT monotherapy in 2000. In the United States, the group led by Alvaro Martinez at William Beaumont Hospital reported the results from a series of prospective trials of first HDR-BT boost and then HDR-BT monotherapy over a period of more than 20 years.
As of 2014, LDR-BT is typically performed with 125 I or 103 Pd; few centers use 131 Cs. The details of these radionuclides and comparison to 192 Ir (used in HDR-BT) are listed in Table 44.4 . The standard procedure for seed implantation is to use a transperineal approach under TRUS and template guidance. Patient position and the TRUS-probe angle should coincide with the preimplant planning study. A high-resolution biplanar ultrasound system (at 5–12 MHz) with dedicated prostate BT software is mandatory. Fluoroscopy is frequently used to monitor seed deposition, as a complimentary imaging modality to TRUS, and is used in some centers for intraoperative dose calculation using image fusion. However, this is not considered mandatory for successful LDR-BT.
Study | References | Type | Arms | n | Total BT dose | Fractions | Gy/fraction | Med FU | Actuarial FU (y) | FFBF (%) | RTOG late Grade 3–4 toxicity% |
EP (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L | I | H | GU | GI | |||||||||||
Demanes (2011) | Prospective | HDR-BT | 157 | 42 | 6 | 7 | 5.2 | 8 | 97 | 97 | N/A | NR | NR | NR | |
HDR-BT | 141 | 38 | 4 | 9.5 | 97 | 97 | N/A | ||||||||
Barkati (2012) | Prospective | HDR-BT | 19 | 30 | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 5 | 97 | 87.5 | N/A | 0 | 0 | 30 | |
HDR-BT | 19 | 31.5 | 3 | 10.5 | 26 | 16 | |||||||||
HDR-BT | 19 | 33 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 0 | |||||||||
HDR-BT | 22 | 34.5 | 3 | 11.5 | 4.7 | 0 | |||||||||
Mark (2007, 2011) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 301 | 45 | 6 | 7.5 | 8 | 8 | 89 | 89 | N/A | 0 | 0.5 | NR | |
Zamboglou (2012) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 141 | 38 | 4 | 9.5 | 4.4 | 5 | 95 | 93 | 93 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 81 | |
HDR-BT | 351 | 38 | 4 | 9.5 | 4.4 | 5 | |||||||||
HDR-BT | 226 | 34.5 | 3 | 11.5 | 4.4 | 5 | |||||||||
Ghadjar (2009) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 36 | 38 | 4 | 9.5 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 100 | N/A | 11 | 0 | 75 | |
Grills (2004) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 100 | 38 | 4 | 9.5 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 98 | 98 | N/A | 10 | 1.1 | NR | |
LDR-BT | 100 | 120 | N/A | N/A | 97 | 97 | N/A | 12 | 0 | NR | |||||
Rogers (2012) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 284 | 39 | 6 | 6.5 | 2.9 | 5 | N/A | 94 | N/A | 1 | 0 | 43 | |
Yoshioka (2006, 2011) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 112 | 48–54 | 8–9 | 6 | 2.2 | 5 | 85 | 93 | 79 | 0 | 1 | NR | |
Sullivan (2007) | Retrospective | HDR-BT + EBRT | 425 | 12–15 | 3 | 4–5 | 3.6 | 5 | NR | 69 | NR | 8 | NR | NR | |
HDR-BT | 47 | 30–33 | 3 | 10–11 | 1.8 | 5 | NR | NR | 0 | NR | NR | ||||
Ghilezan (2012) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 94 | 24–27 | 2 | 12–13.5 | 1.6 | 1.6 | NR | NR | NR | 1.1 | 2.2 | NR | |
Prada (2012) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 40 | 38 | 4 | 9.5 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 100 | 88 | N/A | 0 | 0 | 89 | |
Hayes (2006) | Retrospective | HDR-BT | 326 | 39 | 6 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 3 | 99 | 98 | N/A | 0 | 0 | 75 |
The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommends that CT-based postoperative dosimetry be performed within 60 days of the implant. A planning system generates dose volume histograms, dose volume statistics, and 2D and 3D isodose curves superimposed on CT and other images. Careful postimplant assessment provides providers with objective measures of implant quality allowing for continual technical improvement. Postimplant dosimetry is performed on the day of LDR-BT and a few weeks after the implant (once edema has resolved); satisfactory day 0 dosimetry does not obviate dosimetric calculation on a subsequent date. The time necessary to minimize edema is radionuclide-specific: 16 + 4 days for 103 Pd and 30 + 7 days for 125 I. Improvement of reproducibility of postimplant dosimetry, such as MR-CT image fusion, is also possible.
Regarding dosimetric analysis, the ABS recommends that the following post-BT dosimetric parameters be determined: (1) prostate – D90 (i.e., dose to 90% of the prostate volume) in Gy, V100 (volume receiving 100% of the dose) in percentage, and V150; (2) urethra – V150 in percentage, V5 in percentage, V30 in percentage; and (3) rectum – V100. For the prostate, it is recommended that the D90 is greater than 100% of the prescription dose; the V100 >90–95% of the dose; and the V150 be <60–65% of the dose. Many critical organ dose parameters have been reported. For the urethra, the V150 should be less than the prescription dose; V5 <150%; and V30 <125%. It is recognized that meeting these constraints is not always possible, especially in smaller prostates (<20 cm 3 ). For the rectum, the V100 should be <1 cm 3 on day 0 dosimetry and <1.3 cm 3 on day 30. Critical structures for postimplant erectile dysfunction have not been agreed upon, although the internal pudendal artery, penile bulb, and neurovascular bundles have been studied.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here