Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer: An Overview


Introduction

Patients with localized (i.e., T1–T2) prostate cancer (PCa) have better outcomes if there is local tumor control, even in the presence of high-risk features (e.g., prostate-specific antigen, PSA >20 ng/mL; Gleason score, GS 8–10). Treatment options for localized PCa typically include radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy, which is delivered either as external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; typically, dose-escalated conventionally fractionated RT (CFRT) ) or brachytherapy (BT). In this chapter, we discuss the use of BT for PCa.

Briefly, low dose rate (LDR; defined as ≤2 Gy/h, and typically much less in practice) BT for PCa consists of the permanent deposition of sealed sources (i.e., “seeds”) in the prostate including the tumor. High dose rate (HDR; defined as ≥12 Gy/h) BT consists of temporary robotic source insertion and computer guidance to optimize dose distribution. EBRT (to a lower dose than dose-escalated CFRT; or as hypofractionated RT (HFRT)) combined with either type of BT (i.e., “LDR-BT boost,” “HDR-BT boost,” respectively) is hypothesized to further improve local control and patient outcomes among certain intermediate- and high-risk patients. For reference, the typical fractionation schedules of EBRT (both CFRT and HFRT), LDR-BT, HDR-BT, and BT boost are illustrated in Figure 44.1 .

Figure 44.1, An Illustration of HDR-BT schedules, two EBRT schedules, and an LDR-BT schedule; and the BT boost counterparts.

In this chapter, we discuss the history of BT, the technical aspects and sequencing of BT (with respect to EBRT), the clinical outcomes of BT, and the follow-up after BT. Within each section, we address LDR-BT and HDR-BT separately. Although there are many standard treatment options for PCa, randomized clinical trials to define the optimal therapy for patients with localized disease are limited. BT and BT boost may be used as first-line therapies in the management of PCa patients of all National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-defined risk groups, as listed in Table 44.1 . Before treatment, all patients require a biopsy Gleason score, pretherapy serum PSA, and clinical tumor classification, as these prognostic factors determine low-, intermediate-, or high-risk classification. The contraindications to BT are listed in Table 44.2 . Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may be used with either form of BT, in certain intermediate- and high-risk patients (also listed in Table 44.1 ).

Table 44.1
BT as a Treatment Option for Men with NCCN Risk Group-Stratified Prostate Cancer, in Relation to Other Treatment Options
Reprinted with permission from Davis et al. and Zaorsky et al.
Options and subtypes NCCN risk group
Low Gleason score < 6, and PSA <10 ng/mL, and clinical tumor classification, T1, T2a Intermediate Gleason score 7, or, PSA > 10 ng/mL < 20 ng/mL, or clinical tumor classification of T2b, T2c High Gleason score 8–10, or, PSA >20 ng/mL, or clinical tumor classification of T3a
RP Open, laparoscopic, robotic approaches Monotherapy Monotherapy Monotherapy
BT LDR Monotherapy or boost Monotherapy or boost Boost > monotherapy
HDR Monotherapy Boost
* monotherapy
Boost
* Monotherapy (infrequently)
EBRT CFRT Monotherapy > boost Monotherapy or boost Monotherapy or boost
HFRT * Monotherapy > * boost * Monotherapy > * boost * Monotherapy> * boost
SBRT * Monotherapy * Monotherapy (infrequently) * Monotherapy (infrequently)
± ADT No Sometimes, for 4–6 m Almost always, for 24–36 m
ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; BT, brachytherapy; EBRT, external beam radiation therapy; CFRT, conventionally fractionated radiation therapy; HFRT, hypofractionated radiation therapy; HDR-BT, high dose rate brachytherapy; LDR-BT, low dose rate brachytherapy; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy.

* Denotes treatment options that are largely investigational.

Table 44.2
Contraindications to Prostate BT
Contraindications
Absolute Limited life expectancy (e.g., <10 years)
Unacceptable operative risks, or medically unsuited for anesthesia
Distant metastases
Absence of rectum such that TRUS guidance is precluded
Large TURP defects which preclude seed placement and acceptable radiation dosimetry
Ataxia telangiectasia
Pre-existing rectal fistula
Relative High IPSS score (typically defined as >20)
History of prior pelvic radiotherapy
TURP defects
Large median lobes
Gland size >60 cm 3 at time of implantation
Inflammatory bowel disease
Patient peak flow rate <10 cm 3 /s and post void residual volume prior to BT >100 cm 3
Pubic arch interference (e.g., prior pelvic fracture, irregular pelvic anatomy, or a penile prosthesis)
BT, brachytherapy; IPSS, International Prostate Symptom Score; TRUS, transrectal ultrasound; TURP, transurethral resection of prostate.

Brief historical background of prostate brachytherapy

LDR-BT History

In 1917, the first report of brachytherapy for PCa was published. In the 1950s, LDR-BT was performed with 198 Au. By the 1970s, 125 I seeds were used for prostate implants. However, the dose distribution of these isotopes and clinical outcomes were not ideal. The application of a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to guide LDR-BT was successful in Denmark and the United States in the 1980s. TRUS-guided LDR-BT became a standard technique in the United States in the 1990s because it had improved outcomes and was less invasive when compared to laparotomy-based approaches. LDR-BT has been endorsed for low-risk PCa by organizations including the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the American Cancer Society (ACS), the NCCN, and the American Urologic Association (AUA.)

The disadvantages of LDR-BT include possible seed migration (for loose seeds), high dependence on the operator skill for proper seed placement, permanent deposition of radioactive material in the body, inability to adjust seeds once they are deposited, inability to deliver high doses over a short period of time, variability of dosimetry among implants, and exposure of the staff to radiation. These disadvantages led physicians to explore other BT systems (i.e., HDR-BT) ( Table 44.3 .).

Table 44.3
Properties of Radionuclides Used in BT for Prostate Cancer
BT type Radionuclide Half-life (days) Avg. energy (keV) Years introduced Typical monotherapy seed strength
(mCi) (mCi)
LDR-BT Iodine-125 59.4 28.4 1965 0.3–0.6 0.4–0.8
Palladium-103 17.0 20.7 1986 1.1–2.2 1.4–2.8
Cesium-131 9.7 30.4 2004 2.5–3.9 1.6–2.5
HDR-BT Iridium-192 73.8 380 1980
BT, brachytherapy; HDR, high dose rate; LDR, low dose rate.

HDR-BT History

A TRUS-guided remote afterloading system (RALS) was first introduced in 1980 to deliver a high radiation dose to the prostate and helped address some limitations of LDR-BT. HDR-BT was first used as a boost with EBRT in Sweden, Germany, and the United States in the 1980s and 1990s. HDR-BT was shown to be safe and effective in Phase I/II trials. In Osaka, Japan, a systematic treatment series of HDR-BT boost was started in 1994. After a year of using HDR-BT boost, a trial of HDR-BT monotherapy was initiated. Subsequently, the Osaka group published the first report on HDR-BT monotherapy in 2000. In the United States, the group led by Alvaro Martinez at William Beaumont Hospital reported the results from a series of prospective trials of first HDR-BT boost and then HDR-BT monotherapy over a period of more than 20 years.

Technical aspects and sequencing of brachytherapy for prostate cancer

LDR-BT Technical Aspects

As of 2014, LDR-BT is typically performed with 125 I or 103 Pd; few centers use 131 Cs. The details of these radionuclides and comparison to 192 Ir (used in HDR-BT) are listed in Table 44.4 . The standard procedure for seed implantation is to use a transperineal approach under TRUS and template guidance. Patient position and the TRUS-probe angle should coincide with the preimplant planning study. A high-resolution biplanar ultrasound system (at 5–12 MHz) with dedicated prostate BT software is mandatory. Fluoroscopy is frequently used to monitor seed deposition, as a complimentary imaging modality to TRUS, and is used in some centers for intraoperative dose calculation using image fusion. However, this is not considered mandatory for successful LDR-BT.

Table 44.4
HDR-BT as Monotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicity
Reprinted with permission from Zaorsky et al.
Study References Type Arms n Total BT dose Fractions Gy/fraction Med FU Actuarial FU (y) FFBF (%) RTOG late
Grade 3–4
toxicity%
EP (%)
L I H GU GI
Demanes (2011) Prospective HDR-BT 157 42 6 7 5.2 8 97 97 N/A NR NR NR
HDR-BT 141 38 4 9.5 97 97 N/A
Barkati (2012) Prospective HDR-BT 19 30 3 10 3.3 5 97 87.5 N/A 0 0 30
HDR-BT 19 31.5 3 10.5 26 16
HDR-BT 19 33 3 11 10 0
HDR-BT 22 34.5 3 11.5 4.7 0
Mark (2007, 2011) Retrospective HDR-BT 301 45 6 7.5 8 8 89 89 N/A 0 0.5 NR
Zamboglou (2012) Retrospective HDR-BT 141 38 4 9.5 4.4 5 95 93 93 3.7 1.6 81
HDR-BT 351 38 4 9.5 4.4 5
HDR-BT 226 34.5 3 11.5 4.4 5
Ghadjar (2009) Retrospective HDR-BT 36 38 4 9.5 3 3 100 100 N/A 11 0 75
Grills (2004) Retrospective HDR-BT 100 38 4 9.5 2.9 3.2 98 98 N/A 10 1.1 NR
LDR-BT 100 120 N/A N/A 97 97 N/A 12 0 NR
Rogers (2012) Retrospective HDR-BT 284 39 6 6.5 2.9 5 N/A 94 N/A 1 0 43
Yoshioka (2006, 2011) Retrospective HDR-BT 112 48–54 8–9 6 2.2 5 85 93 79 0 1 NR
Sullivan (2007) Retrospective HDR-BT + EBRT 425 12–15 3 4–5 3.6 5 NR 69 NR 8 NR NR
HDR-BT 47 30–33 3 10–11 1.8 5 NR NR 0 NR NR
Ghilezan (2012) Retrospective HDR-BT 94 24–27 2 12–13.5 1.6 1.6 NR NR NR 1.1 2.2 NR
Prada (2012) Retrospective HDR-BT 40 38 4 9.5 1.6 2.7 100 88 N/A 0 0 89
Hayes (2006) Retrospective HDR-BT 326 39 6 6.5 1.1 3 99 98 N/A 0 0 75
BT, brachytherapy; CSS, cancer specific survival; DM, distant metastasis; EP, erectile preservation; FFBF, freedom from biochemical failure; FU, follow-up; GI, gastrointestinal; GU, genitourinary; H, high-risk; I, intermediate risk; L, low risk; N/A, not applicable; NR, not reported; OS, overall survival; US, ultrasound.
Studies sorted by level of evidence; then by median FU time.

The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommends that CT-based postoperative dosimetry be performed within 60 days of the implant. A planning system generates dose volume histograms, dose volume statistics, and 2D and 3D isodose curves superimposed on CT and other images. Careful postimplant assessment provides providers with objective measures of implant quality allowing for continual technical improvement. Postimplant dosimetry is performed on the day of LDR-BT and a few weeks after the implant (once edema has resolved); satisfactory day 0 dosimetry does not obviate dosimetric calculation on a subsequent date. The time necessary to minimize edema is radionuclide-specific: 16 + 4 days for 103 Pd and 30 + 7 days for 125 I. Improvement of reproducibility of postimplant dosimetry, such as MR-CT image fusion, is also possible.

Regarding dosimetric analysis, the ABS recommends that the following post-BT dosimetric parameters be determined: (1) prostate – D90 (i.e., dose to 90% of the prostate volume) in Gy, V100 (volume receiving 100% of the dose) in percentage, and V150; (2) urethra – V150 in percentage, V5 in percentage, V30 in percentage; and (3) rectum – V100. For the prostate, it is recommended that the D90 is greater than 100% of the prescription dose; the V100 >90–95% of the dose; and the V150 be <60–65% of the dose. Many critical organ dose parameters have been reported. For the urethra, the V150 should be less than the prescription dose; V5 <150%; and V30 <125%. It is recognized that meeting these constraints is not always possible, especially in smaller prostates (<20 cm 3 ). For the rectum, the V100 should be <1 cm 3 on day 0 dosimetry and <1.3 cm 3 on day 30. Critical structures for postimplant erectile dysfunction have not been agreed upon, although the internal pudendal artery, penile bulb, and neurovascular bundles have been studied.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here