Body fluids


Abstract

Background

Body fluids are collected and analyzed either to gain insight into the processes that contribute to the accumulation of that fluid within a body compartment or to provide diagnostic information to investigate pathophysiologic processes.

Content

In the preanalytical phase, the route, equipment, and mechanism for obtaining and transporting the body fluid specimen (including required collection device, volume, temperature, and timeliness of transport to the laboratory) should be communicated and standardized.

In the analytical phase, body fluid testing often does not have manufacturer’s performance claims or laboratory-developed test validation criteria. Such fluids include pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, and synovial fluids, as well as amniotic fluid and cervicovaginal secretions, saliva, sweat, semen, stool, pancreatic cyst fluid, fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) washings, and cerebrospinal fluid. These alternative specimen types may contain matrix interferences that may unknowingly produce inaccurate results that could negatively affect patient outcomes. Recommendations are under development for more robust validation approaches in many of these areas.

In the postanalytical phase, decision limits are often available (e.g., Light’s criteria for discriminating a pleural exudate from a transudate), although the major limitations are the paucity of methodologic detail from historical studies and the fact that such criteria may not be applicable across all fluid types. For a clear understanding of how body fluid tests may leverage important decisions, it is critical that there is a good clinician-laboratory interface to communicate the limitations of body fluid analysis and that those results should always be interpreted in full clinical context.

Background information

Measuring chemistry analytes in a body fluid specimen has several advantages. The pathophysiologic processes that contribute to the buildup of fluid within a body compartment are not always easily identifiable by more traditional means such as through measurement of blood analyte concentrations ( Fig. 45.1 ). In some cases, analysis of the fluid may be a cheaper yet equally useful alternative to more expensive imaging studies. As much as possible, a comprehensive body fluid test report should be provided that can be evaluated in conjunction with these other findings to best aid the interpretation. The aim of this chapter is to provide clinical laboratories with a comprehensive collection of information regarding the acquisition of body fluid specimens, recommendations for the preanalytical phase of testing, and review the utility for measurement of analytes in body fluids, with emphasis on the biochemical analysis.

FIGURE 45.1, Sites from which body fluids may be derived for analysis. CSF, Cerebrospinal fluid.

Workflow

It is important for the laboratory to know and communicate the requirements for analysis of body fluids to the clinical areas responsible for collecting these specimens. Clinicians will be the experts in deciding the route, equipment, and mechanism for obtaining the body fluid specimen, but the laboratory needs to clearly communicate the tube types or containers in which the specimens should be dispensed, the volume required, and the temperature and timeliness of transport to the laboratory for analysis. It is important to recognize that the specimen will likely be sent to multiple sections within the clinical laboratory, including chemistry/immunoassay for analyte/biomarker quantitation, hematology for cell counting, microbiology for culture and Gram stain, and possibly cytology for identification of malignant cells.

Validation of methods

In many jurisdictions, there is an expectation that clinical testing laboratories analytically validate alternative specimen types that are not specifically listed in the packaging provided by the in vitro diagnostics manufacturer of clinical testing assays and instruments. , The second edition of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline titled Analysis of Body Fluids in Clinical Chemistry is published and offers a risk-based approach to designing body fluid validation studies.

Body fluids, particularly the serous fluids arising in pleural, pericardial, and peritoneal cavities, resemble serum to a great extent. However because of potential matrix effects, studies are still needed to demonstrate that abnormal concentrations of protein, usually much lower than that found in blood specimens, alterations in pH, ionic strength, and viscosity do not interfere with the accurate measurement of analytes. In addition to these issues, laboratories are under increasing pressure to provide patient-centered and outcome-based test offerings that satisfy laboratory resources and logistic constraints.

The exact requirements of the analytical validation for a body fluid test depend on local and federal laws. In the United States, for example, the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act of 1988 493.1253(b)(2) stipulates that accuracy, precision, analytical sensitivity, analytical specificity to include interfering substances, reportable range, reference intervals, and any other performance characteristic required for test performance need to be established for a laboratory that modifies a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved test. In other countries, similar governing principles exist, including the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulations set forth by the Department of Health in Australia. Countries within the European Union use Conformité Européene (CE) marking and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for similar purposes. Table 45.1 summarizes the requirements for body fluid assay validation, including the general purpose of the requirement and how it can be related to the case of body fluid validation. There are multiple experiments that may be used to assess trueness, including comparison to a reference method or calculating recovery of analyte on spiking solutions of standard concentration, mixing samples of high and low analyte concentration, or dilution. , One of the major limitations facing the field currently is the paucity of methodologic detail from historical studies and the corresponding difficulty that this confers on providing interpretive information or reference intervals with body fluid results. It is critical that the laboratory maintain an open dialog with clinicians so that both can understand the goals and limitations of such analysis. Fig. 45.2 demonstrates an approach to handling body fluid test requests that are received but that have not previously been validated by the laboratory. The goal of this algorithm is to verify the request is appropriate, assess whether the request has sufficient clinical basis, and verify that the result is accurate in the event that testing is performed and results are reported.

TABLE 45.1
Application of Analytical Validation Requirements to Body Fluid Testing
Study Purpose Purpose in Body Fluid Analysis
Trueness Assess ability of the test system to measure the true concentration or activity of an analyte
  • Determine whether the test system that is intended for use in serum/plasma/urine will measure the target analyte in a body fluid matrix

Precision Assess reproducibility of a method
  • Same, although in a body fluid matrix

Analytical sensitivity Assess reproducibility of a method at the lowest reportable concentration
  • Same, although in a body fluid matrix

Analytical specificity/interfering substances Identify interferences and the extent of their effect on accuracy
  • Same, although the interferences may be more specific, such as meconium in amniotic fluid or high glucose concentration in dialysis fluid

  • Also use discretion when designing the study, because medical decision limits and allowable bias and imprecision will be body fluid and analyte specific

Reportable range Determine the range of concentrations that can be accurately reported, including dilution
  • Same, although in a body fluid matrix

  • Also the choice of diluent may vary depending on the analyte or body fluid source

Reference intervals Allow comparison of observed data versus reference interval for a defined population of subjects
  • Same, although complicated by many challenges (see text for details)

FIGURE 45.2, Algorithm for handling nonstandard body fluid test requests in the clinical laboratory.

Specimen acquisition

Lumbar puncture

Lumbar puncture (LP) is performed by inserting a spinal needle into the subarachnoid space under local anesthesia. The needle is inserted between the spinous processes of the 3rd and 4th or 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae while the patient is lying on the side in a lateral recumbent position or seated upright. Once fluid appears, a manometer is used to measure the opening pressure. A volume of 0.5 to 5.0 mL of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is collected serially into three or four numbered sterile plastic tubes that do not contain additives. The first tube collected is sent for chemistry analysis, the second tube for Gram stain and culture, and the third for cell count and differential. The total volume of CSF collected from an adult ranges from 8 mL for routine assessments to 40 mL when cytology or fungal or mycobacterial cultures are desired. A similar approach is used in children with approximately 1 mL of fluid collected in each tube. Imaging guidance is not routinely used; however, fluoroscopy can be used in cases when multiple unsuccessful attempts have been made or in patients who are obese or who have difficult anatomy.

The primary indication for performing urgent LP is suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection or suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) after normal computed tomography (CT). Nonurgent LP is indicated for the investigation of neurologic symptoms, including headache, seizure, and cognitive decline that may be caused by malignancy or demyelinating or inflammatory CNS diseases. LP is also performed for nondiagnostic purposes, including intrathecal administration of chemotherapy, contrast agents, and anesthesia. LP is contraindicated in patients with infection near the puncture site or increased intracranial pressure, and caution should be used in patients with coagulopathies and thrombocytopenia. , The risk for infection and bleeding after LP is less than 0.01%, whereas post-LP headache is much more common, with a reported incidence ranging from 3% to 36%, depending on the type of needle used.

Thoracentesis

Thoracentesis is a percutaneous procedure in which a needle or catheter is inserted through the posterior intercostal space typically just above the 7th to 9th rib in line with the inferior tip of the scapula. The patient is ideally seated and leaning forward slightly during the procedure and the needle bore varies depending on whether a small or large volume of fluid is anticipated. Local anesthesia (e.g., 1% lidocaine) is administered because the area, especially the pleural membrane, is sufficiently innervated. Under ultrasound guidance, the catheter is advanced into the pleural cavity where a typical volume of 50 to 100 mL of pleural fluid is removed with a syringe.

Diagnostic thoracentesis is indicated for most new effusions greater than 1 mm (based on CT or ultrasound imaging taken in the lateral decubitus position) whereby small volumes (<50 mL) of fluid are aspirated to identify the nature and potential causes of a pleural effusion. The most common causes of pleural effusion include congestive heart failure, malignancy, and pneumonia. Therapeutic thoracentesis may be indicated to relieve dyspnea, and more than 1 L of fluid may be removed for symptom relief. Thoracentesis is not indicated where skin infection at the needle insertion site is present nor where the effusion volume is very small and the risk of complications is increased. The most frequently reported (6%) complication of thoracentesis is pneumothorax, caused when the lung is inadvertently punctured or when air enters the pleural space through the needle. Other less common complications occurring in less than 1% of cases include hemothorax, splenic rupture, abdominal hemorrhage, infection, pulmonary edema, air embolism, and fragmentation of the catheter in the pleural space.

Amniocentesis

Amniocentesis is a percutaneous procedure in which a 20- or 22-gauge needle is inserted, typically under continuous ultrasound guidance, into an unoccupied area of the amniotic cavity to remove amniotic fluid using a syringe, generally after 15 weeks of gestation. The first drops of fluid may contain maternal cells and should be avoided for cytogenetic studies. The volume of fluid that can be safely removed is approximately 1 mL for each gestational week (e.g., 17 mL at 17 weeks).

Diagnostic amniocentesis is performed less frequently now than previously as cell-free DNA in maternal blood is now used more often to screen for common genetic abnormalities and fetal Rh type (see Chapter 72 ). Fetal lung maturity assessment using amniotic fluid has lost favor as guidelines emphasize antenatal steroid administration in preterm infants born before 37 weeks of gestation and administration of surfactants in infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Therapeutic amniocentesis may be performed in cases of polyhydramnios or other conditions in which excess amniotic fluid is produced. The complications associated with amniocentesis include rupture of membranes, fetal injury, infection, and fetal loss. Fetal loss related to amniocentesis typically occurs in the 4 weeks after the procedure at a rate of 0.35% (95% confidence interval: 0.07 to 0.63). Temporary leakage of fluid occurs more frequently (1.7%); however, it is generally associated with normal pregnancy outcomes.

Pericardiocentesis

Pericardiocentesis is a procedure in which an 18-gauge needle or sheathed catheter is inserted into the pericardial space, generally under fluoroscopic, ultrasound, or echocardiographic guidance. The skin and proposed route for the needle is anesthetized with 1% lidocaine. In emergency situations, the procedure may be performed by blind aspiration although this approach carries an increased risk of complications. The volume of fluid removed is predicated on whether the procedure is therapeutic to relieve symptoms of cardiac tamponade or for diagnostic purposes and may vary from a few milliliters to several liters.

The rate of major complications (defined as requiring a subsequent intervention) while using echocardiography has been reported as 1.2%. These include mortality (<0.1%), chamber lacerations, vessel injury, pneumothorax, and infection. Minor complications did not require further intervention and occurred in 3.5% of these cases.

Paracentesis

Paracentesis refers to the procedure in which a 1.5- to 3.5-inch needle is used to obtain peritoneal fluid by percutaneous aspiration typically from midline below the umbilicus or the lower right or left quadrant using ultrasound guidance as needed to avoid vessels, bowel, and the spleen. The site is often anesthetized by injecting 1% lidocaine along the intended path of paracentesis needle insertion. A smaller-gauge needle (e.g., 20- or 22-gauge ) may be used to remove 20 to 60 mL of fluid for diagnostic paracentesis, whereas a larger-bore (e.g., 15-gauge ) needle may be chosen for therapeutic paracentesis when more than 5 L of fluid is typically removed to relieve intra-abdominal pressure.

Diagnostic paracentesis is indicated for patients presenting with new-onset ascites or to evaluate new symptoms, particularly where there is concern for infection, in a patient with existing ascites. Therapeutic paracentesis is undertaken to relieve symptoms of tense ascites, which include dyspnea and early satiety. Few contraindications are reported when performing large-volume therapeutic paracentesis, even in patients with cirrhosis who have significant coagulopathies and thrombocytopenia.

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage was historically performed to predict the need for surgical intervention on patients after blunt abdominal trauma. This technique has been largely replaced by modern imaging techniques, although it may be used in some situations or when imaging is unavailable. It is a two-step procedure in which paracentesis is performed to remove 10 mL of fluid. If blood is aspirated, the procedure ends, and the results are considered positive and are used in conjunction with findings from the physical examination to assess the need for urgent laparotomy. Otherwise, 1 L (or less in children) of saline or lactated Ringer’s solution is instilled into the peritoneal cavity; the fluid is mixed by shifting the patient side to side, and then it is removed using gravity by placing the solution bag near the floor. Cell counts and pancreatic enzymes may be measured in these cases to help identify occult injury.

Arthrocentesis

Arthrocentesis is a procedure in which a joint is aspirated to remove fluid for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes ( Fig. 45.3 ). The procedure may be performed by any trained physician and is commonly undertaken within the emergency department. Ultrasound may help, especially for small effusions. The path of the needle track is anesthetized using 1% to 2% lidocaine to make the procedure relatively painless. An 18- to 22-gauge needle connected to a 10- to 60-mL syringe is used to withdraw as much fluid as possible.

FIGURE 45.3, Anatomy of a normal diarthrodial joint.

Arthrocentesis is indicated to assess acutely painful, hot, and swollen joints and is essential for the diagnosis of septic and crystal-induced arthropathies. Complications include infection and bleeding, with the incidence of iatrogenic infection reportedly approximately 0.01%. This rate may be increased in immunocompromised patients. Joint aspiration has been reported to be safe in patients taking therapeutic doses of warfarin for anticoagulation therapy. The costs and benefits should be weighed for patients with known bacteremia by which infection could spread to the joint. Full aseptic protocols in an operating room are required for joint aspiration when sepsis of a prosthetic joint is suspected. An absolute contraindication for performing arthrocentesis is the presence of cellulitis overlying the joint to be punctured.

Other fluid collections

Cervicovaginal secretions are typically collected using a sterile swab, but that depends on the laboratory tests needed and the requirements for analysis that are often performed at point of care with devices that were designed and manufactured for that intended purpose.

Drainage fluid may be collected from temporary catheters placed after surgery adjacent to injured tissue to prevent the accumulation of fluid and infection of the surgical site. They are considered passive or active. Passive drains rely on gravity to direct fluid from the surgical site and include Penrose, Foley, Word, and Malecot catheters. Active drains rely on negative pressure suction and may be open (i.e., Salem pump) or closed (i.e., Jackson-Pratt). The Jackson-Pratt drain is often preferred because it requires smaller incisions and is associated with a lower potential risk for infection than open drains. The volume of fluid that may be collected varies significantly depending on the indication and location of the drain.

Mixed saliva is collected by asking patients to spit or drool directly into a collection device, although there may be societal barriers to this, especially in older subjects. The presence of xerostomia (dry mouth) may present problems, and the application of citric acid to the tongue has been used to stimulate salivary flow, although this may interfere with immunoassay analysis by decreasing the pH of the sample. Otherwise, saliva collection is facilitated by use of absorbent tissues in the mouth and then extraction by centrifugation. Several commercial collection devices are also available for the collection of saliva samples for hormone or drug analysis that use a collection pad inserted into the mouth to soak up saliva for a standardized period (1 to 2 minutes). It is important, however, to avoid certain materials, such as cotton, known to absorb target molecules from the saliva, leading to falsely decreased measurements.

FNAB is the preferred approach to evaluating patients presenting with head and neck masses. A 23- to 27-gauge needle attached to a 20-mL syringe may be used to aspirate cellular fluid from a mass or lymph node for cytologic examination for malignant cells. The sensitivity and specificity of the cytology results depend on accurate sampling of the mass. In cases in which negative or indeterminate cytologic results are returned, studies have shown that the needle can be rinsed with a fixed volume of saline by which tumor markers may be quantitated in the rinsing fluid to aid in differentiating malignant from benign disease. There are no contraindications for performing FNAB and relatively few minor complications reported.

Specimen containers, transport, and processing

Tube types

The container(s) used to send body fluid specimens to the laboratory from collection locations in the clinic or hospital will depend on the test(s) requested. In most cases for chemistry testing, nonadditive or nongel plastic tubes or containers with tight-fitting leak-proof lids will suffice. They should be transported without delay for further processing or storage before analysis. Cell counting and differential analysis are typically performed from specimens collected in liquid anticoagulant tubes. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulant tubes have been shown to diminish cell clumping in pleural fluids that may lead to falsely low white blood cell (WBC) counts. Culture bottles are used for microbiology. Bedside inoculation of culture bottles is recommended for peritoneal fluid in the assessment of peritonitis. , Bedside inoculation should follow an aseptic technique to prevent growth of contaminant microorganisms. All other fluid types are typically sent to the microbiology laboratory in sterile containers for inoculation. The American College of Chest Physicians and the British Thoracic Society recommend that a portion of pleural fluid should be collected into a heparinized blood gas syringe, capped, placed on ice, and sent to the laboratory for measurement of pH within 1 hour of collection. ,

For synovial fluid analysis, specimens for chemistry and microbiology testing are sent in nonadditive containers. Specimen stability for cell counting and differential analysis has been studied, suggesting that they should be sent in EDTA containers to prevent clotting, especially in patients with inflammatory conditions in which fibrinogen and other clotting factors may be present. WBC counts in EDTA tubes have been shown to be stable for 24 hours at room temperature, whereas heparin (type not specified) caused a 42% decrease at 24 hours. Crystals have also been shown to be stable when stored for 24 hours at 4 °C without anticoagulant, in sodium heparin or liquid EDTA tubes. Powdered anticoagulant tubes are typically avoided to prevent possible interference from crystalline artefacts, although this has not been formally studied. If distributing volume to different tube types, it is good laboratory practice to follow an order of draw protocol similar to that for blood collections to minimize potential for contamination from tube additives.

The type of plastic or polymer that specimen tubes are made from should also be taken into consideration because some analytes may exhibit differing stability dependent on the choice of container. For instance, the stability of the CSF C-amyloid (also called A-β) protein has considerable variability (−48% to 31%) when collected or transferred into polystyrene tubes compared to polypropylene tubes. The mechanism is thought to arise secondary to the hydrophilic or hydrophobic nature of the peptide and its tendency to adsorb to the surface of the tube to an extent that the results may lead to misclassification.

Transport

Stability of analytes to be measured in body fluid specimens should be known from the time of collection until receipt into the laboratory for analysis. The time, temperature, and means of transport are all critical factors to take into consideration and may or may not be similar to those of blood specimens. Studies documenting body fluid analyte stability from the point of collection are limited. However, studies have measured body fluid analyte stability in specimens received in the laboratory. , In general, the only common analytes known to have limited stability are pH, glucose in cellular specimens, and lactate dehydrogenase (LD) when specimens are stored at refrigerated or frozen temperatures. ,

Processing

It is good laboratory practice to assess body fluid viscosity before analysis on automated instruments to ensure the sampling mechanism can accurately pipette the specified volume of specimen. Simple manual methods to assess viscosity include techniques such as the “string test” whereby a drop of the body fluid is touched between the technologist’s gloved fingers and drawn apart. Viscous fluids will create a long string compared to less viscous fluids. A modification of the string test that is practical for laboratories to use to screen specimens for increased viscosity and help ensure accurate sampling on an automated instrument is to use a “drop test” ( Fig. 45.4 ). The technique uses a plastic disposable pipette held perpendicular to the opening of the tube whereby a volume of the fluid is drawn up and then slowly expelled in a dropwise manner back into the tube, observing the length of “tail” that is drawn out as the drop falls from the end of the pipette. Nonviscous fluids produce uniform spherical drops that have relatively short tails, while viscous fluids have longer tails and less spherical shapes. Quantitative methods are available to measure viscosity in biological specimens, though their use is not as practical as the aforementioned methods. The method the laboratory chooses should be included in training procedures using specimens with varying viscosity. Viscous fluids may be diluted before analysis, subjected to a freeze and thaw cycle, or treated with hyaluronidase, an enzyme that hydrolyzes hyaluronic acid, the primary contributor to body fluid specimen viscosity. The method the laboratory uses to treat viscous samples should be validated to ensure the treatment step does not generate inaccurate results. It is also good practice for body fluids to be centrifuged before analysis to remove any cells or debris that may be present in the specimen that may also have potential to create an obstruction or hinder the accurate sampling of the specimen.

FIGURE 45.4, Drop test for assessing viscosity of body fluids before placing on an automated instrument for analysis. (A) Viscous fluids have a longer string connecting to the pipette, whereas (B) nonviscous fluids have uniform shape and no string.

Body fluids and clinical laboratory testing

Cerebrospinal fluid

Formation and physiologic role

In health, CSF is a clear, aqueous liquid that surrounds the brain and the spinal cord, providing buoyant physical support for the brain. It also has a role in intracerebral transport of biomolecules, removal of CNS waste metabolites, maintenance of constant intracranial pressure, and defense against invasion by pathogens. Examination of CSF may provide critically important diagnostic information in a number of infectious and noninfectious medical conditions.

CSF is produced in the choroid plexus, an intricate network of capillaries, epithelial cells, and interstitial connective tissue found in the lateral, third, and fourth ventricles. CSF circulates in the subarachnoid space, where flow is primarily back toward the cerebral hemispheres to the parasagittal region where reabsorption occurs ( Fig. 45.5 ). A small amount of flow is also directed down the brainstem and spinal cord, ultimately returning to the cerebral subarachnoid space, where CSF is reabsorbed in the arachnoid villi. Functioning as valves, the arachnoid villi are located along the superior sagittal and intracranial venous sinuses and around the spinal nerve roots.

FIGURE 45.5, Flow of cerebrospinal fluid in relation to relevant anatomical structures in the central nervous system is depicted by arrows.

CSF is generated in the choroid plexus through processes including ultrafiltration and active transport ( Fig. 45.6 ). A Na + /K + -ATPase in the choroid plexus actively transports Na + into the CSF, causing free water to follow. Choroid epithelial cells contain carbonic anhydrase, and the counter-transport of chlorine and bicarbonate is integral to CSF formation. Other metabolites, including vitamins, are secreted into the CSF by specific transporters, whereas physiologic metabolites such as hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and ammonia may pass by simple diffusion. Proteins are transported from serum to CSF by pinocytosis or specific carriers.

FIGURE 45.6, Representative transport mechanisms employed by choroidal epithelial cells to move ions and macromolecules between serum and cerebrospinal fluid; individual cells depict (left to right) water and electrolyte transport; protein, vitamin, and micronutrient carriers; and bicarbonate metabolism and transport.

The total volume of CSF in adults is 150 mL, generated at an average rate of 20 mL/hr, thus CSF is in a dynamic circulation that is replaced every 5 to 7 hours. Normal CSF pressure measured with a manometer in a patient lying in the lateral decubitus position with the legs extended is between 60 and 250 mmH 2 O, although some authorities consider the upper limit of normal CSF pressure to be 200 mmH 2 O. Processes such as infection, bleeding, or a tumor can cause intracranial hypertension. Slow-growing masses such as abscesses or tumors may allow time for compensation between CSF secretion and absorption to occur, and a rise in CSF pressure may not necessarily be observed.

CSF is normally clear and colorless. The fluid will appear slightly turbid with the presence of more than 200 × 10 6 WBCs/L. Up to 5 × 10 6 WBCs/L (lymphocytes and monocytes) are considered normal in adults and up to 20×10 6 WBCs/L (predominantly polymorphs) in neonates. An increased CSF WBC count does not necessarily indicate an infection because increases can occur in both infectious and noninfectious inflammatory states. Erythrocytes are not normally present in CSF and may be introduced after trauma to a blood vessel during the procedure (“traumatic tap”) or as a result of SAH (see later).

Evaluation for meningitis (glucose, lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, adenosine deaminase)

Glucose concentration in CSF is derived from plasma glucose by both facilitated transport and simple diffusion. Glucose is used by cells lining the ventricular cavities and subarachnoid spaces and, as a result, it normally takes 2 to 4 hours for plasma glucose to equilibrate with CSF glucose. The normal ratio of CSF to serum glucose is approximately 0.6 to 0.8; ventricular CSF has a higher glucose concentration than CSF in the lumbar space by 6 to 18 mg/dL (0.33 to 1.0 mmol/L).

For reporting, CSF glucose must be interpreted in association with a plasma glucose sample collected at the same time. Abnormally low CSF glucose concentrations can occur in bacterial meningitis and also mycobacterial, mycoplasmal, and fungal CNS infections. Using a CSF to serum glucose ratio of less than 0.4, an 80% sensitivity and 98% specificity was found for distinguishing bacterial ( n = 119) versus aseptic cases ( n = 97) of meningitis. During recovery from meningitis, the CSF glucose concentration tends to normalize more rapidly than do the CSF cell count and protein concentration. The CSF glucose concentration is typically normal during most viral CNS infections, although exceptions may occur in patients with meningoencephalitis secondary to mumps, enteroviruses, herpes simplex, and herpes zoster viruses. It should be noted that decreased CSF glucose may result from changes in the physiologic function of the choroid epithelium and from consumption by bacterial pathogens and leukocytes; thus altered CSF glucose may reflect sequelae of disease rather than microbial invasion. Low CSF glucose concentrations can be observed in noninfectious processes, including malignant disease infiltrating the meninges, SAH, and CNS sarcoidosis. However, CSF glucose concentrations less than 18 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) are strongly predictive of bacterial meningitis. The ratio of CSF to serum glucose has limited utility in neonates and in patients with severe hyperglycemia. CSF glucose concentrations rarely exceed 300 mg/dL (16.7 mmol/L), even in patients with severe hyperglycemia. A low concentration of glucose in the CSF in combination with a decreased ratio of CSF to blood glucose may also be encountered in the inherited condition of GLUT 1 transporter deficiency, which may manifest with intellectual disability, intractable seizures, and motor impairment. In these cases, a low to normal concentration of CSF lactate discriminates GLUT1 deficiency syndrome from other causes of low CSF glucose, and this approach has been advocated as a triage before progressing to more specialized mutation analysis in suspected cases.

CSF lactate is predominantly produced by CNS glycolysis and is independent of serum lactate. Increased CSF lactate concentrations are related to increased cerebral glycolysis secondary to hypoxia, ischemia, seizures, SAH, or meningitis. Determination of the CSF lactate concentration has been proposed as a test to differentiate bacterial from viral meningitis. Two meta-analyses including 56 studies and 3577 patients concluded that the diagnostic accuracy of CSF lactate was superior to that of CSF WBC count, glucose, and protein concentration in differentiating bacterial from aseptic meningitis, , although its sensitivity was lower in patients who had received antimicrobial treatment before LP. CSF lactate may be increased in patients with other CNS diseases. Normal CSF lactate is 1.1 to 2.3 mmol/L (10 to 21 mg/dL), and concentrations greater than 4.2 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) are suggestive of bacterial meningitis, while values below this value are suggestive of viral meningitis. In a study of 53 cases of diagnosed meningitis, 24 of 25 patients with bacterial meningitis (culture or positive Gram stain) initially presented with a CSF lactate greater 4.2 mmol/L (37.8 mg/dL). None of the 28 patients with presumed viral meningitis (supported by negative cultures and spontaneous resolution without antibiotics) showed CSF lactate concentrations above 4.2 mmol/L (37.8 mg/dL). In addition, the ratio of CSF to blood glucose of 0.4 in this group allowed the differentiation of patients into bacterial and aseptic cases with almost equal sensitivity (96% by lactate versus 91% by glucose ratio). Decreasing CSF lactate concentrations may be interpreted as evidence of effective treatment of the infection.

LD is an intracellular enzyme that catalyzes the final step in anaerobic glycolysis. Release of LD into the CSF occurs as a result of cell death. It is therefore a nonspecific marker of cell necrosis and may be raised in a number of pathologic conditions, including meningitis, with a markedly higher rise in bacterial versus viral meningitis. The CSF LD reference interval is 0 to 23.5 U/L. CSF LD is also increased in primary brain tumors and metastases, particularly those involving the meningeal membrane, and hematologic metastases, including leukemic infiltration. It is also raised in cases with increased intracranial pressure (hydrocephalus), seizures, hypoxia, and cerebral ischemia. Determination of LD isoenzymes in the CSF does not confer any additional clinical utility.

C-reactive protein (CRP) has been proposed as another analyte that may offer utility in discrimination of bacterial and viral meningitis. The majority of CSF CRP is derived from serum, where it is produced by the liver as an acute-phase reactant in response to several disease states. Intrathecal synthesis of CRP is minimal. Many studies have been undertaken with contrasting findings, and the overall conclusion is that CRP is insensitive, nonspecific, and too dependent on a functioning host inflammatory response to make it diagnostically useful for distinguishing septic from aseptic meningitis. It does not confer any diagnostic advantage over the more established markers of CSF cell count, protein, glucose, and lactate. Similar conclusions have also been reached for CSF cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 (IL-1), and interleukin 6 (IL-6), where the concentrations present depend on the ability of the host to mount an immune response.

Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is an enzyme present in leukocytes, released in response to increased inflammatory activity after CNS infection and has been proposed as a marker to distinguish tuberculous (TB) meningitis from other forms of meningitis. It was found that CSF ADA was increased in 64% of TB and bacterial meningitis cases, a sensitivity that conferred no advantage over protein or glucose measurement. Furthermore, patients with sepsis demonstrated a wide range of concentrations. Other studies have shown similar findings, and it is concluded that CSF ADA does not confer any diagnostic advantage over CSF glucose or protein.

Evaluation of demyelinating diseases (cerebrospinal fluid index, oligoclonal banding)

Under normal circumstances, immunoglobulins are almost totally excluded from the CSF, with a ratio of blood to CSF IgG normally 500:1 or greater. The detection of restricted clones of immunoglobulin synthesis in the CSF, termed oligoclonal bands, may occur in any disorder that disrupts the blood–brain barrier, including systemic inflammation. In demyelinating disorders, however, the detection of strictly intrathecal IgG synthesis is an important diagnostic criterion, although it should be complementary to clinical assessment and radiologic imaging. In these conditions, infiltration with B lymphocytes leads to the release of immunoglobulins, primarily IgG. The CSF IgG concentration may be increased because of increased plasma concentration, impaired barrier function, or increased intrathecal synthesis. Methods for the determination of increased intrathecal synthesis include detection of CSF oligoclonal banding visually by electrophoresis or isoelectric focusing. For further discussion about these techniques refer to Chapter 18 . Another approach is to calculate the CSF IgG index or synthesis rate, which is often used in a complementary fashion.

The CSF IgG index is calculated as:

IgGindex = (CSF IgG/Serum IgG) ×(Serum albumin/CSF albumin)

CSF concentrations in mg/L; serum concentrations in g/L.

The reference interval for the CSF IgG index is 0.3 to 0.7, and ratios greater than 0.7 indicate increased intrathecal synthesis, as seen in more than 80% of cases of multiple sclerosis, although this can also be seen in other demyelinating conditions. , It should be noted, however, that in certain conditions in which the integrity of the blood–brain barrier is compromised, including SAH and traumatic LP, the IgG index can be falsely increased. Interpretation of CSF IgG concentrations and derived indices is much more reliable when the albumin index (see “Proteins”), a marker of the integrity of the blood–brain barrier, is also normal.

The rate of intrathecal IgG synthesis can be estimated by the empirically derived Tourtellotte’s formula, and a synthesis rate of greater than 8 mg/day is found in most cases of multiple sclerosis. It is a more complex formula with several constants and probably provides no additional information over the IgG index.

For determination of CSF oligoclonal banding by electrophoresis or isoelectric focusing, it is essential that a serum sample is analyzed concurrently so that intrathecal synthesis may be distinguished from banding that originated in the serum and diffused across the blood-CSF barrier. It is a subjective interpretation, and positivity is considered to be the presence of two or more bands in the CSF, immune-fixing as IgG, and not present in matching serum. Recognized patterns ( Fig. 45.7 ) are normal (banding not detected in either CSF or serum), positive (bands present in CSF but not serum), matching bands present in both serum and CSF (indicative of systemic inflammation), and bands present in both serum and CSF, though with additional bands present in CSF, which may be interpreted as a positive. The absence of CSF oligoclonal banding does not necessarily exclude the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and its presence does not necessarily confirm the diagnosis, as other demyelinating conditions can also give rise to CSF oligoclonal banding ( Table 45.2 ).

FIGURE 45.7, Isoelectric focusing gels (Sebia, Hydragel 9; Norcross, Georgia) of paired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (C) and serum (S) samples, showing bands of immunoglobulin G. (1) No bands in either CSF or serum, reported as “oligoclonal banding not detected.” (2) Bands present in CSF but not serum, reported as “oligoclonal banding detected.” (3) Matched banding pattern in CSF and serum, not supportive of intrathecal immunoglobulin G synthesis, reported as “oligoclonal banding not-detected.” (4) Matched banding pattern in CSF and serum, although with additional CSF bands, reported as “oligoclonal banding detected.”

TABLE 45.2
Causes of Cerebrospinal Fluid Oligoclonal Banding
Modified with permission from Thompson EJ, Keir G. Laboratory investigation of cerebrospinal fluid proteins. Ann Clin Biochem 1990;27:425–435.
Clinical Disorder Approximate Incidence (%)
Multiple sclerosis 95
Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis 100
Neurosyphilis 95
Neuro-Lyme disease 80
Neuro-AIDS 80
Neuro-SLE 50
Neuro-Behçet 20
Neurosarcoid 40
Guillain-Barré syndrome 60
Cysticercosis 80
AIDS, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus.

POINTS TO REMEMBER

Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal banding

  • Is an index of intrathecal IgG synthesis.

  • It is characterized by two or more bands in CSF, fixing as IgG, but not present in serum.

  • It is vitally important that matching serum is also analyzed for oligoclonal bands.

  • It is present in up to 95% cases of multiple sclerosis.

  • Its detection may be indicative of disorders other than multiple sclerosis.

Evaluation for subarachnoid hemorrhage (bilirubin, xanthochromia)

SAH usually occurs secondary to rupture of a cerebral aneurysm and results in arterial bleeding into the subarachnoid space. It is vitally important that the correct diagnosis is made in the first instance, given that patients may present with further hemorrhage and with a potentially fatal outcome. The demonstration of blood on a CT scan will be positive in 98% of patients with SAH presenting within the first 12 hours. Historically, CT scanning has failed to detect approximately 5% of SAH cases, although the advent of newer generation CT scanners has improved sensitivity significantly. , Patients with a positive CT scan usually proceed to cerebral angiography, a procedure to confirm the presence and location of an aneurysm so that it can be treated to prevent further hemorrhage. Those patients with a suggestive history of SAH who have a normal CT scan usually proceed to lumbar puncture, although the reliance on lumbar puncture is diminishing as the sensitivity of imaging modalities improves.

After hemorrhage into the CSF, red blood cells (RBCs) undergo lysis and release oxyhemoglobin, which is converted in vivo, through the action of heme oxygenase enzymes in the leptomeninges in a time-dependent manner to form bilirubin and sometimes methemoglobin. Only bilirubin arises solely from in vivo conversion, although CSF bilirubin will also be increased when CSF total protein or serum bilirubin are increased. Oxyhemoglobin may be introduced into the CSF at the time of a “traumatic tap.” Diagnosis of SAH therefore hinges on the detection of bilirubin in CSF, for which spectrophotometry is the recommended approach. Visual inspection for the yellow discoloration (xanthochromia) imparted to CSF is not considered to be reliable, because the sample may appear to be completely clear to the naked eye despite an abnormal spectrophotometric scan. The UK guidelines provide a sound practical framework for how to obtain appropriate samples and undertake and interpret spectrophotometric scans of CSF. It is worth noting that because bilirubin is produced in a time-dependent manner, the absence of detectable bilirubin does not rule out SAH, particularly if CSF is collected within 12 hours of the onset of the bleed.

The UK guidelines recommend that the specimen for spectrophotometry should be the least blood-stained fraction of CSF taken (usually the last and ideally the fourth). The volume must enable laboratory analysis without dilution. The specimen should be protected from light, and it is recommended that the use of pneumatic tube systems to transport the specimen be avoided. A simultaneous blood specimen should be taken for serum bilirubin and total protein measurement. The timing of sampling relative to that of possible hemorrhage should be no less than 12 hours. The specimen designated for spectrophotometry should be centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes within 1 hour of collection. The supernatant should be stored in the dark at 4 °C until analysis.

A zero-order spectrophotometric scan is performed on the supernatant between 350 and 600 nm using a cuvette with a 1-cm path length and an initial full-scale deflection of 0.1 absorbance units (AU) and with further scaling, as appropriate.

The following heme pigments should be identified:

  • Oxyhemoglobin: Absorbance maximum between 410 and 418 nm.

  • Bilirubin: Either a broad peak in the range of 450 to 460 nm or a shoulder adjacent to an oxyhemoglobin peak if present.

  • Methemoglobin: The rarest pigment, and if present, it usually manifests as a broader peak than oxyhemoglobin, occurring between 403 and 410 nm.

Net bilirubin absorbance (NBA) is calculated according to Chalmers’ modification to the original method of Chalmers and Kiley, by drawing a predicted baseline, which forms a tangent to the scan between 350 and 400 nm and again between 430 and 530 nm ( Fig. 45.8 ). The absorbance of the scan is measured above this predicted baseline at 476 nm; this is the NBA. If the baseline forms a tangent to the scan before 476 nm, then the measured NBA is by definition zero. The absorbance of any oxyhemoglobin peak above this predicted baseline should also be measured as the net oxyhemoglobin absorbance. Typical zero-order spectra are shown ( Fig. 45.9 ) with an interpretative algorithm ( Fig. 45.10 ) as defined in the UK guidelines. An NBA of greater than 0.007 AU is considered supportive of SAH, although if a visible oxyhemoglobin peak is not observed, an adjustment needs to be made for prevailing plasma bilirubin and CSF protein to derive an adjusted NBA, which is then interpreted according to the algorithm (see Fig. 45.10 ). The predicted absorbance (PA) of CSF at 476 nm because of bilirubin can be calculated according to the following equation and used to derive an adjusted NBA:

PA = (CSF protein [g/L]/serum protein [g/L]) × serum bilirubin (μmol/L) × 0.042 AU

FIGURE 45.8, Derivation of net bilirubin absorbance (NBA) at 476 nm from spectrophotometric scan of cerebrospinal sample, also showing an oxyhemoglobin peak at 415 nm.

FIGURE 45.9, Representative spectrophotometric scans showing net bilirubin absorbance (NBA) at 476 nm above a tangential baseline, as described in the text. (A) Normal cerebrospinal fluid with essentially no bilirubin; scan and baseline (not drawn) are superimposable. (B) NBA within the reference range. (C) Oxyhemoglobin with zero NBA. (D) Oxyhemoglobin with NBA within the reference range. (E) Oxyhemoglobin with an increased NBA.

FIGURE 45.10, Bilirubin absorbance in cerebrospinal fluid for detection of intracranial bleed.

Then adjusted NBA = measured NBA-PA.

Most cases that are positive for bilirubin in the first week after an SAH will also be expected to have a visible oxyhemoglobin peak. A traumatic tap introduces red cells into the CSF and results in fluid that is blood stained initially, though it clears as the collection proceeds from tubes 1 to 4, which can be confirmed by measuring cell counts. The distinction may be confounded when a traumatic tap occurs in the presence of an SAH. In a traumatic tap, bilirubin is not produced, given that this is an in vivo process, although a large oxyhemoglobin peak (>0.1 AU) may obscure the region where bilirubin absorbance is normally measured and render interpretation difficult. A series of interpretative comments is suggested in the UK guidelines. Although the wording of the suggested comments in some cases is nuanced, these are essentially dichotomous, channeling a patient toward either angiography or an alternative diagnosis and possibly early discharge.

The UK guidelines recommend caution for use where the CSF bilirubin is increased because of an increased CSF protein alone, or where there is an increased serum bilirubin and the CSF protein is greater than 1.0 g/L, although this may still be consistent with SAH.

Scanning spectrophotometry, however, is not necessarily suited for all clinical laboratories, and many laboratories still rely on visual inspection. As an alternative approach, some have evaluated the measurement of CSF bilirubin on an automated instrument, using the Jendrassik-Grof method, calibrated to measure lower bilirubin concentrations, and found 100% negative predictive value for an abnormal scan at a CSF bilirubin cutoff of 359 nmol/L (0.02 mg/dL) and with no evidence that any case of SAH had been missed. It also provides an alternative approach when there is an insufficient volume of sample for spectrophotometry (a minimum of 500 μL required), although the positive predictive value for an abnormal scan is only 70%. Some laboratories have adopted this approach as a screen to rule out samples that do not need to undergo spectrophotometry. The caveat is that each laboratory should meticulously validate its own diagnostic performance before adopting this procedure into clinical application. ,

POINTS TO REMEMBER

Detection of subarachnoid hemorrhage

  • Visual inspection of CSF samples alone is not an adequate examination.

  • Scanning spectrophotometry is the preferred approach.

  • CSF samples should be taken at least 12 hours after onset of symptoms.

  • Detection of increased bilirubin absorbance (>0.007 AU) is supportive of SAH.

  • Increased bilirubin absorbance may be masked by a large oxyhemoglobin peak.

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of dementia

In the setting of dementia, CSF examination has traditionally been used to exclude infection and malignancy, although more recently, CSF analysis using immunochemical techniques has enabled a range of neuronal-specific biomarkers to be measured. CSF β-amyloid (Aβ1-42) is thought to be one of the key biological forms of β-amyloid protein in brain tissue and inversely reflects brain amyloid burden, with reduced concentrations in Alzheimer disease (AD). Reduction of CSF Aβ-1-42 has been shown to occur years before symptom onset and to have positive predictive value for progression from mild cognitive impairment to clinical AD. CSF concentrations of total tau (T-tau), which reflects the intensity of neuronal degeneration and hyperphosphorylated tau (P-tau181P), which is believed to be a marker of neurofibrillary tangle pathologic conditions are both increased in AD. T-tau, however, is also increased after stroke, in inflammatory conditions, and in other neurodegenerative diseases, most notably in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, in which concentrations are often orders of magnitude higher than in AD. In contrast, P-tau181P increase is thought to have high specificity for AD. The combination of low CSF Aβ1-42 and increased T-tau and P-tau181P to Aβ1-42 ratio has been used to support the diagnosis of AD, with one study suggesting that the ratio of T-tau to Aβ1-42 ratio is the most robust biomarker combination.

These biomarkers have been incorporated into the revised diagnostic criteria of AD and are also well established as part of inclusion and exclusion criteria for clinical trials. A low CSF Aβ1-42, however, does not always reflect brain amyloid deposition, being seen in other non-AD causes of dementia such as Lewy body disease or vascular dementia. Most importantly, however, it has become recognized that altered concentrations of CSF Aβ1-42 and other markers may result from variations in the way that CSF is collected, stored, or processed, which has hampered the comparison of CSF Aβ1-42, T-tau, and P-tau181P concentrations between different laboratories and studies. The Alzheimer’s Biomarkers Standardization Initiative has made recommendations for preanalytical stringency for CSF biomarkers for AD. Temperature of freezing, delay until freezing, and freeze-thaw cycles have been shown to influence CSF biomarker concentrations, stressing the need for harmonized operating procedures for preanalytical sample handling, although there is no need to recommend any particular time of day for LP. Fasting is not required for analysis of Aβ1-42, T-tau, and P-tau181P biomarker concentrations.

From an analytical perspective, standardization efforts from the IFCC have enabled the production of certified reference materials (CRM) CSF for Aβ1-42, with concentrations assigned using a mass spectrometry reference measurement procedure that has been extensively validated. This has paved the way for the development of fully automated assays with the potential for wider adoption of these biomarkers into clinical practice. Further impetus in this area is likely following the publication by the National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA), which has defined AD as a process identified primarily using biomarkers.

There is also an evolving evidence base for autoimmune neurologic disorders manifesting with features of a rapidly progressive dementia, which may be responsive to immunomodulatory therapy and for which the detection of CSF biomarkers of autoimmunity may be helpful. For example, detection of neural autoantibodies in serum or CSF may help inform the physician of a possible autoimmune cause and raise suspicion for a paraneoplastic cause. Available in only a few reference centers, some of the antibodies are predictive of a malignant cause, for example of small-cell lung carcinoma (antineuronal nuclear antibody-type 1 [ANNA-1], collapsin response-mediator protein-5 neuronal [CRMP-5]-IgG), ovarian teratoma ( N -methyl-d-aspartate receptor NMDA-R), and thymoma (CRMP-5 IgG).

Other clinically significant analytes in cerebrospinal fluid

Proteins (total).

Proteins are largely excluded from the CSF by the blood-CSF barrier and gain access primarily through pinocytotic vesicles traversing capillary endothelial cells. CSF proteins, predominantly albumin, may be increased as a result of increased permeability of the blood–CSF barrier, most commonly due to inflammatory conditions. Another mechanism is reduced flow of spinal CSF resulting from obstruction above the point of sampling due to abscess, tumor, or prolapsed intervertebral disc, allowing more time for equilibration of fluid between CSF and plasma. Another mechanism is through immune response within the CSF giving rise to intrathecal synthesis (see earlier discussion) and finally when destruction of brain tissue releases proteins directly into the CSF. An index of the integrity of the blood–CSF barrier is provided by the ratio of CSF albumin concentration (milligrams per deciliter) to serum protein (grams per liter). A CSF/serum albumin index less than 9 indicates an intact blood–CSF barrier, 9 to 14 slight impairment, 14 to 30 moderate impairment, and greater than 30 severe impairment.

The normal CSF protein concentration ranges from 0.23 to 0.38 g/L in adults. CSF protein concentrations in premature and term neonates normally range between 0.2 and 1.7 g/L. Albumin accounts for 50% to 60% of lumbar CSF total protein and is present in a concentration of 0.4% that of plasma. CSF protein can be increased by SAH or a traumatic LP. The presence of CSF bleeding results in approximately 1 mg of protein/dL per 10 6 RBCs/L. Increases in the CSF protein concentration can occur in both infectious and noninfectious conditions, including conditions associated with obstruction of CSF flow.

Protein concentration increases from ventricle to lumbar region (a rostrocaudal gradient), reflecting variation in the permeability of the blood–brain barrier and increased time for equilibration in the lumbar region. Low CSF protein concentrations may be seen in samples taken from the ventricles or cisterns. Other causes include repeated LP, chronic CSF leakage, idiopathic intracranial hypertension, acute water intoxication and in some children between the ages of 6 months and 2 years.

Tau transferrin is a desialylated transferrin formed during receptor-mediated transferrin transfer into the CSF. Normally removed from the systemic circulation by the reticuloendothelial system, it is a specific marker protein for CSF that can be identified by electrophoresis or immunofixation in cases of suspected leakage, for example, after trauma or surgery to the skull or spinal canal.

Prealbumin (transthyretin) is synthesized in the choroidal plexus, and its CSF concentration is 5 to 10 times greater than predicted by passive diffusion alone. For comprehensive coverage of CSF proteome and protein biochemistry, see Chapter 31 .

Tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, human chorionic gonadotropin, α-fetoprotein).

Tumor markers, such as chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), α-fetoprotein (AFP), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), are products of tumor cells, which are commonly measured in serum to monitor clinical response to treatment and relapse of many tumors. In CSF, however, their utility is limited to subsets of metastatic disease. Given that CEA, AFP, and hCG are not expressed in neuronal tissue, they may be useful markers for detecting metastasis in patients with tumors that produce these markers when there is no disruption of the CNS–blood barrier. CEA was found to be an insensitive marker for CNS tumor detection except in cases of metastasis, in which the primary tumor is known to secrete large amounts of CEA (e.g., some adenocarcinomas of the lung and breast).

Neuron-specific enolase.

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is a protein localized in the cytoplasm of neurons. It has been proposed as a marker for ischemic or traumatic brain damage and may predict clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury. Although brain specific, NSE may be increased in other neuropathologic processes (e.g., epilepsy and SAH) that present with a clinical picture that may resemble stroke. Specificity to the brain is therefore a helpful but not sufficient characteristic to confer diagnostic utility for NSE as a disease marker. Specificity is further limited as other factors can influence systemic NSE concentrations, including hemolysis, which may be prevalent in traumatic brain injury.

Neopterin.

Neopterin is a pteridine compound that has been used as a marker of cell-mediated immune activity. The CSF concentrations of this mediator have been investigated in infectious and autoimmune disorders of the CNS particularly in the setting of encephalopathy. For example, it has been measured in CSF to monitor dementia complex associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. In one study, 70 patients with HIV dementia complex had higher CSF concentrations of neopterin (36.8 ± 3.6 nmoI/L) than did patients with HIV without neurologic involvement (8.2 ± 1.0 nmol/L). CSF neopterin has a relatively short half-life and may be used as a dynamic marker of an active process.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here