Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Mental health has become a public health crisis ( ). In the past decade, suicide rates have increased 33%, mental illness has become the group of disorders with the highest years lost to disability (Global Health Data Exchange; http://ghdx.healthdata.org ), and depression surpassed all other chronic illnesses as a source of global disability ( ; https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254610/WHO-MSD-MER-2017.2-eng.pdf;jsessionid=87FBBD04685D824264F8EF206FF39FC7?sequence=1 ). It has been suggested that every medical healthcare provider become familiar with the detection of mental illness; indeed, epidemiological studies find more than half of the population with mental illness is not receiving health care ( ). Healthy aging across the life span is also a topic of importance for evaluation of behavior and personality changes in persons with neurological disorders or diseases. A primary domain to consider when working with persons with acquired brain disorders or degenerative brain diseases is the changing ability of the individual’s communication. Fig. 9.1 shows the areas of the brain involved in pain sensation and gating. A brief evaluation of the figure shows the vast regions of the brain that can be interrupted by brain disease and numerous behavior challenges can arise when pain circuitry is interrupted. Behavior evaluation should always include a general evaluation of potential needs that a neurological patient may be unable to communicate such as pain, pressure, discomfort (from constipation), or other basic sensory disruptions such as temperature, hunger, or overstimulation. Common changes that occur over time in the brain can also impact behavioral changes associated with brain disease. For instance, data have suggested that brain processing shows a shift away from cognitive control toward greater activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which involves processing of affective stimuli, such as emotion. Behavioral assessment can benefit from using environmental efforts to engage cognitive appraisals that may decrease with brain disease or impairment. Fig. 9.2 shows the typical cognitive and emotional processing changes that occur over the life span.
Behavioral and personality disturbances commonly occur in individuals with neurological disease or injury ( Table 9.1 ). Identification and treatment of behavioral disturbances are critical to neurology health care because they are frequently associated with reduced functional capacity, decreased quality of life, greater economic cost, more caregiver burden, placement in facilities, and morbidity. Common behavioral and personality disturbances in individuals with neurological disease or injury include depression (see Chapter 10 for additional information), anxiety, agitation, disinhibition, apathy, obsessional thinking, psychosis (i.e., hallucinations and delusions), and unawareness, among others. Etiology of behavioral and personality change is likely multifactorial, including physiological disruption of various brain circuits, most notably the frontosubcortical circuits, neurochemical disruption within the brain, and/or psychological and cognitive factors, including impact of disability and memory. Although these symptoms can be challenging to fully realize in a clinical examination room, clear identification and appropriate management is of utmost importance. The aim of this chapter is fourfold. First, factors contributing to behavioral and personality change in neurological illness and injury are discussed. Second, assessment methods for behavior and personality in persons with cerebral dysfunction are detailed. Third, information regarding the prevalence, phenomenology, and treatment of behavior and personality disturbances in dementia, movement disorders, epilepsy, stroke, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) is presented. Finally, discussion regarding the treatment and management of behavioral and personality dysfunction is outlined.
Depression | Apathy | Anxiety | Psychosis | Aggression | PBA | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AD | 0%–86% | Up to 92% | — | 10%–73% | 33%–67% | — |
ALS | 40%–50% | — | — | — | — | 10%–49% |
FTD | — | 95% | — | 20% del., 7% hall. | — | — |
VaD | 32% | — | 19%–70% | 33% del., 13%–25% hall. | — | — |
PD | 40%–50% | 16.5%–40.0% | — | 16% del., 30% hall. | — | 4%–6% |
HD | Up to 63% | 59% | — | 3%–12% | 19%–59% | — |
TS | 73% | — | — | — | — | — |
MS | 37%–54% | — | 9.2%–25.0% | — | — | 10% |
Epilepsy | 8%–63% | — | 19%–50% | 0.6%–7.0% | 4.8%–50.0% | — |
Stroke | 30%–40% | — | Up to 27% | — | Up to 32% | 11%–34% |
TBI | 6%–77% | 10%–60% | 11%–70% | 2%–20% | 11%–98% | 5%–11% |
The current chapter focuses on behavioral and personality changes in neurological disease and injury. Please see Chapter 44 for detailed information on assessment and description of common cognitive changes observed in neurological disease and injury.
The frontosubcortical circuits provide a unifying framework for understanding the behavioral changes that accompany cortical and subcortical brain dysfunction. Alexander and colleagues described five discrete parallel circuits linking regions of the frontal cortex to the striatum, the globus pallidus and substantia nigra, and the thalamus (Alexander, DeLong and Strick, 1996). Five frontosubcortical circuits were initially described as motor, oculomotor, dorsolateral prefrontal, lateral orbitofrontal, and anterior cingulate gyrus. Disruption of dorsolateral prefrontal, lateral orbitofrontal, and anterior cingulate gyrus circuits have been associated with behavioral and personality disruptions. Specific behavioral syndromes have been attributed to dysfunction in these circuits ( Box 9.1 ) ( ). Disruptions at any point in the circuit (e.g., the frontal cortex, corpus striatum, globus pallidus) may result in alterations of behavior. Disruption of the dorsolateral circuit ( Fig. 9.3 ) is associated with executive dysfunction, which results in problematic behavior secondary to poor planning, organization, and decision making. Moreover, stimulus-bound behavior sometimes seen in late dementia may be attributable to disruptions in this circuit. Disruption of the orbitofrontal circuit ( Fig. 9.4 ) is believed to be associated with increased irritability, impulsivity, mood lability, tactlessness, and socially inappropriate behavior. Finally, disruption of the anterior cingulate gyrus circuit is believed to be associated with decreased motivation, apathy, decreased speech, and akinesia.
Poor organizational strategies
Poor memory search strategies
Stimulus-bound behavior
Environmental dependency
Impaired set-shifting and maintenance
Emotional incontinence
Tactlessness
Irritability
Undue familiarity
Antisocial behavior
Environmental dependency
Mood disorders (depression, lability, mania)
Obsessive-compulsive disorder
Impaired motivation
Akinetic mutism
Apathy
Poverty of speech
Psychic emptiness
Poor response inhibition
In addition, nonneural factors likely contribute to behavioral and personality change in neurological illness and injury. provide a model of these factors in dementia. This model lends itself well to other neurological syndromes and injuries. They describe the contribution of patient, caregiver, and environmental factors ( Fig. 9.5 ).
Patient factors include an individual’s premorbid personality and psychiatric disorders. For example, disinhibition that starts secondary to disruption of frontal subcortical circuits may result in exacerbation of preexisting traits, such as irritability. Other factors related to the injury/illness can also contribute to behavioral and personality change. Cognitive factors such as memory impairment may additionally impact behavior and personality change, such as delusional thinking. In many situations, behavioral disturbances may reflect an individual with impaired cognitive and language abilities attempting to communicate information to their care providers ( ). Other aspects of illness and injury such as disability (which has been linked with depression) or anosognosia additionally impact behavior and personality. Unmet needs that may or may not be related to the primary neurological diagnosis may impact behavior and personality. For example, pain, hunger, or sleep deprivation may contribute to increased agitation. Finally, acute factors such as urinary tract infection (UTI), dehydration, and/or constipation can additionally impact behavior and personality factors.
Many individuals with neurological illness and injury rely on assistance from caregivers. Factors associated with the caregiver (e.g., lack of education about dementia) can additionally impact behavior and personality change among those with neurological illness and injury. Strain in relationships either due to preexisting patterns of behavior or due to caregiver stress or burden impacts the patient’s behavior. Finally, environmental factors can reduce or exacerbate behavior in individuals with neurological illness and injury. For example, overstimulation (i.e., increased noise, materials, people) can increase behavioral difficulties, whereas structure and routine can reduce behavioral symptoms.
There is evidence that appropriate treatment of behavior and personality disturbances in patients with acquired brain dysfunction can reduce required care levels and prevent hospitalizations ( ). Clinical assessment and research of behavior and personality change in individuals with neurological disease and injury are laden with challenges and complexity. Some limitations of the available research are as follows:
Treatment of other symptoms (such as a movement disorder) may mask psychiatric and behavioral symptoms.
Most available neuropsychiatric assessment tools use conventional psychiatric terminology based on idiopathic psychiatric illness, which sometimes fails to distinctly reflect the symptoms associated with acquired disease and/or trauma.
There is overlap between symptoms of cerebral dysfunction and symptoms of behavior and personality disturbances; for example, psychomotor retardation or reduced energy, libido, or appetite might reflect an underlying syndrome (Parkinson disease [PD]), an acquired injury (e.g., TBI), or a major depressive episode.
Cognitive impairments may confound the detection of behavioral changes. For example, language and memory deficits occurring in individuals with cerebral dysfunction can limit self-reports and can restrict the ability to assess changes in mood or insight.
The validity of the behavioral dysfunction assessed can vary depending upon the source. Ample research shows that clinical ratings acquired from the patient, a collateral or spouse, and a healthcare worker can vary widely (see, e.g., ). Patients with cerebral dysfunction may have impaired insight; thus they may underreport behavioral difficulties. Similarly, caregivers may also provide biased information because their current mood or degree of caregiver burden may influence their reporting of behavioral symptoms.
Nevertheless, clinically meaningful and objective measures of behavioral symptoms are very important. In the clinic, an unstructured but targeted interview with the patient and the caregivers separately can be useful. Inventories and scales based on semistructured interviews give valuable insight when used with appropriate training.
Neurological illness or injury may manifest as depression. In fact, depression is frequently a very early symptom or precedes onset of illness in many neurodegenerative disorders ( ). There are several scales available for the assessment of mood disorders that might be useful in patients with acquired cerebral dysfunction. When clinicians think time is limited, self-report scales can be helpful in determining which symptoms are present and how bothersome or severe each symptom is. Table 9.2 offers additional information regarding these scales. Individuals scoring highly on these self-report measures may benefit from referral for additional evaluation and possible intervention by mental health professionals.
Scale | Method | Items | Domains Assessed |
---|---|---|---|
BDI-II | Self-administered | 21 | Cognitive symptoms Performance impairments Somatic symptoms |
CES-D | Self-administered | 20 | Somatic symptoms Depressed affect Positive affect Interpersonal problems |
GDS | Self-administered | 30 | Sad mood Lack of energy Positive mood Agitation/anxiety Social withdrawal |
HADS | Self-administered | 14 | General depression Anxiety |
HDRS | Interview | 21 | Anxiety General depression Insomnia Somatic symptoms |
PHQ-9 | Self-administered | 9 | Cognitive symptoms Somatic symptoms Level of functional impairment |
ZDS | Self-administered | 20 | Positive affect Negative symptoms Somatic symptoms |
Domains assessed by the different measures vary such that certain scales may not detect some symptoms of depression. Two of the most commonly used measures are the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Although research assessing the appropriateness of these measures in neurological populations is sparse, there is some evidence that the BDI may be a useful screening tool in PD and Tourette syndrome (TS), and the PHQ-9 has shown some support for use in multiple sclerosis (MS) ( ). However, these measures assess several symptoms such as psychomotor retardation and reduced energy that are common in neurological illness and injury. Thus care must be taken to be certain that these measures do not suggest the person is depressed based on symptoms of neurological syndrome or injury. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was developed for use in elderly populations and may be a useful screening tool for patients with early dementia and PD.
Several measures have been created to assess other behavioral and personality disturbances that occur in patients with cerebral dysfunction ( Table 9.3 ). These measures were specifically designed to assess behavioral symptoms in specific diagnoses, such as Alzheimer disease (AD): Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS); Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD); Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer Disease (CERAD) Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia (C-BRSD); general dementia: Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI); frontal lobe dementia: Frontal Behavior Inventory (FBI); TBI: Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS-R); and damage to frontal regions: Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe). Some measures such as the NPI and the FrSBe have been implemented in diverse conditions, including AD, PD, Huntington disease (HD), and MS. In addition, the NPI, which is available in an interview and a questionnaire format, has been frequently used as an outcome measure in clinical trials. More recently, efforts to better assess apathy have emerged ( ). Many of these measures might be useful ways to screen for a wide variety of potential behavioral disruptions among patients with neurological illness or injury. For individuals with limited insight and awareness, collateral reports of these difficulties may be of particular importance.
Scale | Administration | Behaviors Assessed | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source | Time (Minutes) | Depression | Apathy | Anxiety | Psychosis | Aggression | |
ADAS | Patient and caregiver Trained examiner |
45 | Yes | No | No | Yes | No |
BEHAVE-AD | Caregiver interview | 20 | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
C-BRSD | Caregiver interview | 20–30 | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
FBI | Caregiver interview | 10–15 | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
FrSBe | Patient questionnaire Caregiver questionnaire |
10 | No | Yes | No | No | No |
NPI | Caregiver interview | 10 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
NPI-Q | Caregiver | 5 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
NRS-R | Patient/caregiver interview | 15–20 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) is reported to occur in at least 90% of individuals diagnosed with AD and related disorders ( ). Patients with AD experience a wide range of behavioral disturbances, including affective symptoms, agitation, aggression, disinhibition, anxiety, apathy, and psychosis. Behavioral disturbances in AD are associated with increased caregiver burden, patient and caregiver abuse, greater use of psychotropic medications, more rapid cognitive decline, and earlier institutionalization. Unfortunately, there are no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs to treat BPSD and off-label pharmacological approaches perform poorly in AD ( ). New approaches must be considered to address the multiple consequences of these symptoms for independence and care programs. Current research involves review of the serotonergic system for cognition and BPSD in AD ( ), identification of methylation differences for specific genes involved in mood, stress, and hippo signaling ( ), and efforts to group behavior irregularities into conceptual/biological domains ( ). These newer research efforts require replication; however, translation to clinical care is expected within the next decade for biological markers of BPSD as well as more formal treatment strategies ( ). For instance, one group reported that anhedonia is more highly associated with cognitive decline, whereas dysphoria was more associated with anxiety and mood disturbances ( ).
Use of atypical antipsychotic medications has historically been the preferred method of treatment for behavioral disturbances in AD, including irritability, aggression, and psychosis. However, use of atypical antipsychotic medications in elderly adults may be associated with a nearly twofold increase in risk for mortality ( ). In addition, a multisite study of atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone) showed no significant difference in Clinical Global Impression Scale scores for any antipsychotic medication over a placebo group ( ). Moreover, more participants found the side effects of the atypical antipsychotic medications to be intolerable compared with the placebo group ( ). In a retrospective observational study, behavioral symptoms were reduced in more than 20% of patients following treatment with antipsychotics, while a full half of participants exhibited worsening of symptoms ( ). However, other retrospective observational studies have reported improvements in 33%–43% of individuals with AD and behavioral disturbances treated with atypical antipsychotics ( ). In addition, a retrospective cohort study showed that men display higher risk than women of developing a serious adverse event when started on an oral atypical antipsychotic ( ). The FDA have issued a black-box warning on the use of antipsychotics in elderly persons with dementia. Antipsychotics may be beneficial in a small subgroup of individuals, but care must be taken in prescribing such medications, owing to the potential side effects in the context of questionable effectiveness. A review of the clinical trial literature for cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine suggests that individuals treated with these pharmaceuticals typically do experience a reduction in behavioral symptoms, including improved mood and abatement of apathy ( ).
The true prevalence of depression in AD is controversial, with estimates up to 86%. One reason for the mixed findings lies in the different methods used to assess depression in AD, such as family interviews and patient self-report. Some symptoms of depression are confounded with components of AD (e.g., concentration, energy, interest). The probability of depression in AD appears to be greater if there is a history of depression either in the patient or in the family. Table 9.4 suggests differences between the signs of depression and confounding signs of dementia. Interestingly, there does not appear to be a clear relationship between depressive symptoms and severity of AD ( ). Depression is associated with greater social and functional impairments in patients with AD ( ), although others have not observed a correlation between depression and functional impairment ( ).
Major Depression | Dementia |
---|---|
Acute, nonprogressive | Insidious and progressive |
Affective before cognitive | Cognitive before affective |
Attention impaired | Memory impaired |
Orientation intact | Orientation impaired |
Complains of memory | Minimizes/normalizes memory |
Gives up on testing | Obvious effort on testing |
Language intact | Aphasic errors |
Better at night | Sundowning |
Self-referred | Referred by others |
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) remain the preferred mode of treatment for depression in AD, and, although sertraline and citalopram have been shown to be effective ( ), findings are mixed. Although discontinuation of current antidepressant treatment shows worsening ( ), one review ( ) suggests that secondary to the absence of benefit compared with placebo and the increased risk of adverse events ( ), the use of antidepressants for first-line treatment of depression in AD should be reconsidered. One recent paper formulated recommendations for future work:
It remains both ethical and essential for trials of new medication for depression in dementia to have a placebo arm.
Further research is required to evaluate the impact that treatments for depression in dementia have on carers in terms of quality of life and the time they spend caregiving.
Alternative biological and psychological therapies for depression in dementia should be considered, including new classes of antidepressants (such as venlafaxine) or antidementia medication (e.g., cholinesterase inhibitors).
Research is needed to investigate the natural history of depression in dementia in the community when patients are not referred to secondary care services.
Further work is needed to investigate the costs of depression in dementia, including caregiver burden and moderators to the treatment effects ( ). A recent publication suggests that antidementia medication and nonpharmacological interventions can be potential choices ( ).
Apathy , defined as diminished motivation not attributable to decreased level of consciousness, cognitive impairment, or emotional distress, is among the most common behavioral changes noted in AD. Assessment of apathy in AD may be difficult because it may be unclear whether decreased activity is due to apathy or inability to perform activities. Consistent with expectations based on frontal subcortical circuitry, apathy in AD has been shown to be associated with bilateral reductions in gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and putamen ( ). Apathy in AD is associated with greater functional and cognitive impairment ( ) and lower quality of life ( ).
Aggressive verbalizations and acts are common in AD. Reported prevalence rates range from 25% to 67%; studies have indicated that verbal aggression is more common in men and in individuals with delusions or agitation ( ) and is associated with increased placement in skilled nursing facilities. Sertraline has been associated with a 38% response rate for the treatment of aggression and irritability in AD ( ).
Prevalence rates of psychotic symptoms in AD range from 10% to 73%, with rates in clinical populations exceeding community-based samples. Interestingly, hallucinations and delusions are significantly less common among individuals with early-onset AD ( ). Once present, delusions recur or persist for several years in most patients with AD ( Fig. 9.6 ). The presence of hallucinations is associated with increased placement in skilled nursing centers.
The delusions reported in AD are typically paranoid type, nonbizarre, and simple. Complex or bizarre delusions seen in patients with schizophrenia are conspicuously absent in patients with AD. However, misidentification phenomena are common in AD. Hallucinations in AD are more often visual than auditory, whereas the reverse is true for schizophrenia ( Table 9.5 ).
Psychosis in Alzheimer Disease | Schizophrenia in the Elderly | |
---|---|---|
Incidence | 30%–50% | <1% |
Bizarre or complex delusions | Rare | Common |
Misidentification of caregivers | Common | Rare |
Common form of hallucinations | Visual | Auditory |
Schneiderian first-rank symptoms | Rare | Common |
Active suicidal ideation | Rare | Common |
History of psychosis | Rare | Very common |
Eventual remission of psychosis | Common | Uncommon |
Need for many years of maintenance on antipsychotics | Uncommon | Very common |
Average optimal daily dose of an antipsychotic | 15%–25% of that in young adult with schizophrenia | 40%–60% of that in a young adult with schizophrenia |
Previously it was believed that individuals with AD experienced delusions secondary to significant cognitive difficulties. Evidence from neuropsychological investigations suggests more executive and frontal dysfunction in AD with psychotic symptoms than AD without these symptoms. The presence of delusions in AD is associated with poorer performance on the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) but was not related to global measures of cognitive impairment (i.e., Mini Mental Status Examination [MMSE]) ( ). However, more recent research has identified additional correlates and biological markers of psychosis. For example, delusions have been associated with reduced gray matter volume in the inferior right frontal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobule ( ). Persons with AD and hallucinations (but not delusions) are at significantly increased risk for mortality ( ).
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous group of syndromes, including primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Consensus criteria for diagnosis of FTD have been described, with presence of behavioral change an important feature, especially in bvFTD. Behavioral changes may also be present in PPA, particularly later in the course. Caregiver distress is greater among individuals with FTD and behavioral changes, particularly apathy and disinhibition, versus those with primarily aphasic difficulties ( ).
Atrophy within the frontal lobes leads to disruption of the frontosubcortical circuits and the characteristic behavioral syndromes in FTD. Two classic behavioral syndromes have been described among individuals with FTD: an apathetic and a disinhibited subtype. Apathy is a very common symptom in individuals with FTD. Individuals may show little concern for personal hygiene and may appear unkempt. Moreover, symptoms of orbitofrontal syndrome, such as disinhibition, poor impulse control, tactlessness, and poor judgment are common. Loss of empathy, mental inflexibility, and stereotyped behaviors are also common. Symptoms similar to those observed in Klüver-Bucy syndrome, such as hyperorality and hypersexuality, may occur in late stages. Frequently the family members and caregivers are the ones who report these behavioral disturbances, because many patients with FTD experience reduced insight into their current difficulties. Behavioral change to varying degrees has been described in all FTD syndromes, including PPA ( ), although they frequently are less severe and/or occur later in the progression of the illness.
From a pathological perspective, individuals with FTD vary with regard to the degree to which the frontal versus temporal lobes and right versus left hemispheres are affected. Significant research has looked at the relationship between patterns of behavioral syndromes and underlying neuropathology (see , for a review). Individuals with bvFTD typically exhibit greater frontal versus temporal atrophy, which is typically symmetrical. Evidence shows that individuals with bvFTD and primarily apathetic behavioral changes show greater frontal involvement, particularly from/in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ( ). Individuals with primarily disinhibited behavioral change show greater involvement of the right mediotemporal limbic and temporal lobe ( ), although others have described increased atrophy within the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ( ). Individuals with semantic dementia (SD), a variant of PPA, most typically exhibit atrophy and dysfunction within the left anterior temporal lobe, whereas individuals with SD and behavioral changes are more likely to also exhibit changes in the ventromedial and superior frontal lobes. Individuals with progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), another PPA variant, are more likely to show changes in left frontal and perisylvian areas.
No curative treatments exist for FTD. However, there has been some success with pharmacological intervention for behavioral dyscontrol. Although few large-scale studies have been completed, evidence suggests that behavioral disturbances such as disinhibition, overeating, and compulsions may show some response to treatment with SSRIs ( ).
As noted in the consensus criteria, individuals with FTD frequently exhibit anosognosia. This loss of insight may manifest as an inability to perceive symptoms or a lack of concern for their current difficulties. Among individuals with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), individuals with bvFTD exhibit greater anosognosia than individuals with the aphasic subtypes of FTLD ( ). Patients with FTD frequently describe significantly fewer problems with cognition and behavior than what their caregivers describe. Moreover, this observed discrepancy between patient and caregiver report is greater among individuals with FTD than in individuals with AD, particularly for language, behavior, and functioning difficulties ( ). Severity of anosognosia is not typically associated with severity of dementia ( ). The relationship between impaired awareness and specific neuropathology is somewhat unclear. Some studies have shown an association between impaired awareness and right frontal disruptions ( ), whereas others have shown a link between anosognosia and involvement of the right temporoparietal cortex ( ).
Dementia secondary to vascular changes is among the most common causes of dementia in older adults. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l’Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) diagnostic criteria for vascular dementia (VaD) include the presence of dementia and cerebrovascular disease, including evidence of such disease on imaging, with a documented relationship between these two criteria (see , for a recent review). Pathologically, VaD frequently involves small-vessel disease involving white matter hyperintensities and/or lacunar strokes, most commonly affecting subcortical regions; therefore frontosubcortical circuits are frequently disrupted, and behavioral disturbances are common. Apathy, depression, and behavioral changes are common in VaD. The presence of significant cerebrovascular changes is observed among individuals with AD, suggesting that both pathologies may be present among a large subgroup of individuals with dementia.
The mean reported prevalence of depression in VaD is 32%, although rates vary widely between studies ( ). Sample source likely influences the reported prevalence rates, with community samples endorsing lower rates of depression than clinic samples. Individuals with VaD and depression are less likely to have had a stroke and are more likely to have a prior history of depression and impairments in memory or attention than patients with VaD without depression. The relationship between age and depression in VaD is unclear, with increased rates of depression being reported in both younger and older samples.
Apathy in VaD is associated with increased impairment in both basic and instrumental activities of daily living ( ). This relationship is particularly apparent in patients with VaD who have also experienced a stroke. Rates of psychotic symptoms are similar in AD and VaD. Delusions (33%) and visual hallucinations (13%–25%) are reported in VaD and are associated with impaired cognitive functioning ( ). Care must be taken in the assessment of delusions in VaD and in dementia in general. It is important to differentiate delusions from confabulation or thought processes based on impaired cognitive functioning.
Behavioral changes are common in PD, and, although research has adequately characterized these difficulties, little controlled research has assessed the effectiveness of various interventions. The majority of neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD are more common in patients with mild cognitive decline or dementia, possibly related to shared underlying pathologies ( ). Accurate diagnosis of neuropsychiatric syndromes in PD is important but can be difficult, due to overlapping of motor signs of parkinsonism: cognitive impairment, mood disorders, and apathy. Table 9.6 offers more detailed information regarding characteristics of behavioral change observed in PD as well as recent reviews of neurotherapeutic methods ( ). See a recent review of the neuropsychiatry of PD whose authors report that these symptoms remain underrecognized and undertreated ( ).
Syndrome | Subtype | Key Feature | Treatment |
---|---|---|---|
Depression | Major depression | Low mood or loss of interest/pleasure | No large controlled trials published to date. Nonpharmacological (counseling), dopamine agonists (pramipexole, ropinirole), antidepressants (tricyclics, trazodone, SSRIs, SSNRI, SNRI, mirtazapine) |
Minor depression | Low mood and/or loss of interest/pleasure | No available evidence | |
Dysthymia | Low mood ≥2 years | No available evidence | |
Anxiety | Panic attacks | Episodic panic attacks | Poor evidence for benzodiazepines, clomipramine, nonpharmacological |
GAD | Excessive, often irrational anxiety or worry | Same as above | |
Psychosis | Hallucinations | Seeing imaginary people or animals | Clozapine: two randomized trials showing improvement |
Delusions | False, fixed idiosyncratic beliefs, maintained despite contrary evidence | Same as above | |
Apathy | Lack of initiative, motivation | Limited evidence: dopamine agonists, stimulants, modafinil |
Depression is the most common psychiatric disturbance in persons with PD. Depending on the threshold for diagnosis and sample assessed, reported rates vary. Depression may predate the onset of motor symptoms in PD ( ). Risk factors for depression in PD include greater cognitive impairment, earlier disease onset, and family history of depression. Depression is not associated with increased motor symptom severity ( ). The correlation between depression and disability is equivocal. Although the precise etiology is unknown, it is believed that depression in PD results from disruptions in dopamine (D2), noradrenaline, and serotonin pathways ( ).
Very few well-controlled studies have assessed antidepressant therapy in PD. Available research suggests that SSRIs are well tolerated and likely effective in the treatment of depression in PD (see , for a review). SSRIs are frequently implemented as a first-line therapy for depression in patients with PD, although SSRIs may worsen motor symptoms. In such cases, tricyclic antidepressants may be an effective alternative. Successful treatment of depressive symptoms with an SSRI may also result in reductions in anxiety and decreased disability.
Hallucinations, typically visual, occur in up to 40% of patients with PD, with 16% reporting delusions ( ). Psychotic symptoms are very uncommon early in the course of PD. Other diagnoses such as dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) should be considered in patients exhibiting hallucinations early in the course of the disease. Table 9.7 summarizes important distinctions between psychosis in PD and DLB. Psychotic symptoms are more common in PD patients with greater cognitive impairment, longer duration of illness, greater daytime somnolence, and older age and in those who are institutionalized. Psychotic symptoms are strong predictors of nursing home placement and mortality in PD ( ).
Psychosis in Parkinson Disease | Psychosis in Dementia With Lewy Bodies |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical accounts of PD rarely described psychotic symptoms, and it has been postulated that psychosis occurred secondary to dopamine agonist use. Although dopamine agonists may contribute to the development of psychosis, additional factors are also important. For example, individuals with psychosis are more likely to exhibit cholinergic deficits and have Lewy bodies in the temporal lobe observed at autopsy ( ).
Intervention for remediation of psychotic symptoms in PD can involve several processes. Discontinuation of anticholinergics, selegiline, and amantadine before reducing l -dopa is recommended. Following these discontinuations, reduction and simplification of dopamine agonists may be beneficial. Atypical antipsychotics are added only when a reduction of other medications has not resulted in improvement, because even atypical antipsychotics have been associated with worsening of PD motor symptoms ( ).
Individuals with PD often experience increased rates of apathy. Estimates of apathy in PD have ranged from 16.5% to 40.0%. Individuals with apathy exhibit greater cognitive impairment ( ). Controlled clinical trials for apathy in PD are very limited. Environmental and other behavioral interventions including establishment of a routine, structured schedule, and cuing from others can be helpful in some settings. Dopamine agonists, psychostimulants, modafinil, dopamine agonists, and testosterone have been reported to be helpful in decreasing apathy (see , for more detailed information).
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here