Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Cardiac rhythm disturbances are common in dialysis. Multiple studies have shown a high prevalence of ventricular and atrial ectopy and conduction abnormalities in hemodialysis patients, reflecting both the proarrhythmic nature of the hemodialysis process itself and the high burden of structural heart disease in kidney failure populations. The prevalence of chronic or recurrent rhythm disturbances, especially atrial fibrillation, is several-fold higher than in the general population. Treatment of arrhythmias in dialysis patients can be challenging, and in many instances, the risk-to-benefit ratio of many therapies is altered or uncertain.
The present chapter summarizes what is known about the etiology and management of rhythm disturbances in hemodialysis. The major emphasis is on chronic management of arrhythmias in dialyzed patients, especially atrial fibrillation. Because the acute management of life-threatening unstable arrhythmias deviates little from current advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines, only important differences are highlighted. The reader is encouraged to review the latest ACLS guidelines (see Recommended Reading).
It should be remembered that most of the recommendations in this chapter are based on imperfect or evolving data, mostly in patients without kidney failure. In the future, direct evidence in hemodialysis populations may help refine the arguments presented here.
Both patient factors and dialysis factors contribute to arrhythmic risk. Significant underlying cardiac disease, present in the majority of hemodialysis patients, is independently associated with conduction disturbances, atrial and ventricular ectopy, and death. Superimposed on this substrate, changes in volume and extracellular ion composition during dialysis enhance myocardial irritability ( Table 45.1 ). Ventricular ectopy and atrial ectopy are more frequent during dialysis than in the interdialytic period. Both atrial (p-wave) and ventricular (t-wave) dispersions increase during dialysis, enhancing the likelihood of reentrant arrhythmias. Rapid extracellular fluid (ECF) volume fluxes are being associated with catecholamine surges and subendocardial ischemia, which are, in turn, associated with ventricular ectopy. Rapid lowering of potassium, particularly in patients taking cardiac glycosides, is arrhythmogenic, and attenuation of these changes by stepwise ramping of dialysate potassium during dialysis seems to reduce ventricular ectopy. Many of the cardiac drugs commonly used in hemodialysis patients (e.g., digitalis preparations) exhibit arrhythmogenic toxicities because of altered pharmacokinetics, end-organ effects, or both.
|
The prognostic impact of arrhythmias in hemodialysis patients is incompletely defined. Frequent or complex ventricular ectopy is associated with lower survival, but this effect is not independent of age, hypertension, and underlying heart disease and may simply be a marker of poor cardiac status.
Acute unstable or life-threatening rhythms, defined as heart rhythms associated with chest pain or evidence of circulatory insufficiency (e.g., frank shock, hypotension, impaired mentation), should be managed as per current ACLS guidelines. As a general rule, the dialysis procedure should be stopped unless a clear metabolic precipitant correctable by dialysis is present (e.g., hyperkalemia induced heart block). Intravenous access via the fistula or central line should be maintained. Because a thorough discussion of ACLS procedures is beyond the scope of this chapter, the reader is encouraged to download the latest edition of the ACLS recommendations (see Recommended Reading). Any additional considerations in hemodialysis patients are discussed under specific rhythm disturbances.
Avoidance of arrhythmogenic stimuli during dialysis may be helpful, particularly in patients in whom dialysis reliably precipitates arrhythmias. Measures such as strict control of interdialytic fluid gain and potassium intake may decrease the need for aggressive ultrafiltration and low potassium dialysate. Substitution of normal instead of the usually elevated calcium bath may be helpful. Discontinuation of arrhythmogenic drugs (e.g., cardiac glycosides) should be seriously considered. Conversion to an alternative dialysis modality, such as peritoneal dialysis, short daily hemodialysis, or long hours of nocturnal hemodialysis, can be tried if other measures fail.
Aggressive medical and surgical therapy of underlying cardiac disease has been shown to prolong life and decrease morbidity in the general population. In contrast, with few exceptions, specific antiarrhythmic therapy does not prolong life and may increase mortality in patients with heart disease. In hemodialysis patients with arrhythmias, a search for an aggressive treatment of ischemic heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction is probably more important than antiarrhythmic therapy. Appropriate indications for established life-saving therapies such as aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and coronary revascularization are discussed elsewhere.
Ventricular ectopic beats (also called ventricular premature contractions) are a common rhythm disturbance in dialysis. They may be precipitated or exacerbated by acute changes in volume and ECF composition. Minimizing these alterations may reduce or eliminate the ectopy ( Table 45.1 ). Medications should be reviewed to identify and stop proarrhythmia medications (e.g., domperidone). Blood chemistry should be reviewed to identify and correct derangements in calcium, potassium, and magnesium.
Complex ventricular ectopy is usually associated with underlying structural heart disease. Underlying cardiac disease should be aggressively sought and treated. With a cardiac history, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiogram, and cardiac perfusion scan are reasonable investigations to request in this regard. Referral to cardiology is indicated if significant cardiac disease is identified since treatment (e.g., coronary revascularization) will typically improve symptoms. In addition, cardiology referral is also indicated in patients with persistent ectopy despite review and optimization of dialysis prescription and medications, or if ectopy is complex or associated with persistent symptoms. Further therapeutic options for symptomatic patients or patients with frequent ectopic rhythms may include catheter ablation of an ectopic focus and consideration of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients meeting ICD criteria.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here