Anticoagulants, thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors, fibrinolytics and volume replacement agents


During pregnancy, the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is substantially increased. Antithrombotic therapy is indicated for the prevention and treatment of VTE, but such treatment is challenging because these medications have the potential to cause adverse effects in the developing fetus. The possibility of increased maternal bleeding is also an important consideration when these medications are used prior to surgical intervention or delivery. Low molecular weight heparins are the drugs of choice in the prevention and treatment of VTE during pregnancy because they have fewer side effects and cross the placenta poorly, if at all. The embryotoxicity of vitamin K antagonists, particularly that of warfarin , is well-known. Warfarin and other related coumarins have been found to produce a characteristic pattern of malformations, such as nasal hypoplasia, stippled epiphyses, and growth retardation in the children of women who took these drugs during pregnancy. The greatest period of susceptibility is between the 8th and 12th weeks postconception although, because of their long half-lives, discontinuation of treatment or substitution with heparin at 6 weeks post conception is recommended to avoid embryonic exposure. Also, usage during the second and third trimesters has been associated with growth restriction and behavioral dysfunction. Congenital anomalies have been reported among infants born to mothers who were treated with dipyridamole during pregnancy, but the rate of anomalies reported in these studies is small and the pattern of anomalies is inconsistent. No teratogenic effects have been reported in case studies of infants whose mothers had been treated during pregnancy with streptokinase, a plasminogen activator. At present, there is limited experience with the use of novel oral anticoagulants, such as dabigatran , rivaroxaban , and apixaban during pregnancy. Use of these and other related drugs that have insufficient teratology data should be considered on a case-by-case basis. The aim of this chapter is to provide the clinician with a review of the known teratogenic effects of currently used antithrombotic agents as well as recommendations for their appropriate use during pregnancy.

Indications for anticoagulation

During normal pregnancy, the concentrations of nearly all coagulation factors progressively rise in response to higher estrogen levels along with a decrease in the activity of coagulation inhibitors (e.g. antithrombin). These changes result in reduced fibrinolytic potential due to increased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitors (PAI) produced by the placenta and a hypercoagulable state of pregnancy that does not return to normal until approximately 8 weeks after delivery ( ). This increase in coagulation tendency appears to reflect a physiological need for effective coagulation during delivery after separation of the placenta. However, a consequence of these changes in hemostasis and fibrinolysis is an increased risk of VTE that is five times more frequent during pregnancy and occurs in 0.2% of cases ( , ).

Thrombophilia is a group of inherited or acquired coagulation disorders that is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events such as VTE and pulmonary embolism. Commonly inherited thrombophilia include the Factor V Leiden mutation, the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, and deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C and protein S. Antiphospholipid syndrome belongs to the acquired thrombophilia ( ). Growing evidence suggests that thrombophilia is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as early and late pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, placental abruption, and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) ( ). However, the absolute risk of VTE and serious adverse pregnancy outcomes remains low. Universal agreement regarding the necessity and effectiveness of antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy has not been established to date because of the lack of reliable data ( ). A prior thrombotic event or thrombophilia is not currently viewed by all clinicians as an indication for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy (see Section 2.9.2 ). Most recommendations include the following indications:

  • Thromboprophylaxis in patients with an established increased risk, including patients with malignancies, postoperative patients, long-term immobilization.

  • Prevention and treatment of VTE.

  • Prevention and treatment of systemic embolism in patients with valvular heart disease and/or mechanical heart valves.

  • Prevention of pregnancy loss in women with antiphospholipid antibodies and previous pregnancy losses.

Heparins and danaparoid

Heparin

Pharmacology

Heparin is a chain-linked, sulfated glycosaminoglycan, that is found naturally in the body and is produced by basophils and mast cells. Heparins prevent thrombus formation and limit thrombus extension by binding to lysine sites on antithrombin III and producing a conformational change that accelerates the rate at which antithrombin III neutralizes the hemostatic enzymes, thrombin (factor IIa) and factor Xa. Decreased levels of antithrombin III lead to resistance to heparin. When heparin is administered in low doses for prophylaxis, it is mainly factor Xa that is neutralized; in higher therapeutic doses, thrombin will also be neutralized. Heparins can initiate plasminogen activator release by endothelial cells, and this accounts for their fibrinolytic activity. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has a molecular weight ranging from 5,000–30,000 daltons (Da). It inhibits factors IIa and Xa equally well. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are fragments of the native heparin molecule with molecular weights that range between 1,000–10,000 Da. They have a different anticoagulant profile and are less able to catalyze the inhibition of thrombin relative to factor Xa due to their shorter chain lengths, which range between 5–17 monosaccharides.

Heparin is the strongest organic acid which exists in the body. The strong negative charge of heparin is important for the inhibition of coagulation. The formation of chemical salts with organic cations, such as protamine ( Section 2.9.3 ), quickly overrides the actions of heparin.

UFH has a short half-life of 1–2 hours. Due to its strong negative charge and high molecular weight UFH is not absorbed in the gut. Consequently, heparin must be administered intravenously or subcutaneously. This is also true for LMWHs, such as certoparin , dalteparin , enoxaparin , nadroparin , reviparin and tinzaparin . LMWH are increasingly preferred to UFH for thromboprophylaxis as well as for the treatment of VTE and in the pregnant patient. Their advantage lies in a longer half-life requiring only one or two injections per day, better bioavailability (85%) and their association with a lower incidence of osteoporosis, allergy, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). analyzed all studies published to the end of 2003 for the use of LMWH during pregnancy. They extracted data on VTE recurrence and adverse side effects from almost 2,800 pregnancies and found that LMWH were both safe and effective when used to treat VTE during pregnancy. Bleeding events and allergic skin reactions occurred in almost 2% and osteoporotic bone fractures in 0.04% of the cases. The authors did not find a single case of HIT. In addition, 95% of the pregnancies resulted in a live-born infant.

The long-term therapy with UFH has been associated with an increased risk of heparin-induced bone loss and osteoporotic fracture. Depending on the dose and duration of use, LMWH may have less influence on bone metabolism than UFH and therefore cause less bone loss, although not all studies have confirmed this effect ( , ). The decrease in bone loss observed in some of the studies may be related to maternal supplementation with calcium during treatment. More studies are needed before the true incidence of heparin-induced osteoporosis in pregnant women can be determined. Long-term anticoagulant therapy is associated with an increased risk of bleeding; however, the risk associated with the use of heparin is relatively low, around 2% ( , , , ).

Prolonged anticoagulation therapy increases the risk for spinal hematoma formation, especially following neuraxial blockade ( ). Guidelines for neuraxial blockade and thromboembolic prophylaxis have been established in a number of countries ( , ). These guidelines specify the interval of time that the medications should be discontinued prior to puncture or removal of a catheter in order to avoid bleeding complications. Timing intervals vary among the different guidelines, but generally the interval of time that is recommended is two times the elimination half-life of the drug that is administered. Accordingly, prophylactic doses of UFH should be discontinued at least 4 hours prior to neuraxial blockade or catheter withdrawal and therapeutic doses of UFH should be discontinued at least 6 hours before blockade or catheter removal. Since LMWH have longer half-lives, prophylactic or therapeutic treatment with these drugs should be stopped 12 or 24 hours, respectively, before neuraxial blockade or catheter removal ( ). A study of 284 pregnant women who were treated with enoxaparin for an average of 251days found that the rate of hemorrhagic complications during delivery was not significantly increased when enoxaparin was discontinued at least 12 hours beforehand ( ).

Toxicology

Placental transfer of UFH or LMWH is expected to be minimal due to their high molecular weight and negative charge ( , , ). This has been confirmed by studies that have failed to find detectable levels of UFH or LMWH in samples from the umbilical cord vein after administration to pregnant women or in the fetal circulation following dual perfusion of an isolated placental lobule ( , ). The frequency of malformations or other adverse effects did not appear to be increased in more than 20 clinical studies of infants whose mothers were treated with either LMWH or UFH for various periods of time during pregnancy ( , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ) On the other hand, major birth defects were reported in seven (11%) of 65 infants whose mothers had been given a prescription for heparin during the first trimester of pregnancy in a surveillance study of Michigan Medicaid recipients (Rosa, cited in ); the expected rate of birth defects was 5%. Four of the malformed infants had cardiovascular defects. The possible contribution of confounding factors in this study, such as maternal use of other drugs and underlying maternal disease, is not known. Congenital aplasia cutis has been reported in two infants whose mothers were given tinzaparin during pregnancy ( ). Whether the association observed in these two case reports is causal or coincidental is unknown.

To date, heparin-induced alteration of the fetal coagulation system has been demonstrated in a sheep model ( ), but not in humans; although subdural hemorrhages of prenatal onset were reported in one infant whose mother took dalteparin for deep vein thrombosis during pregnancy ( ). It is feasible, then, that transplacental passage of LMWH may occur on rare occasions, as in pregnancies complicated by preterm delivery and placental abnormalities. In one study of 693 newborns whose mothers had received enoxaparin during pregnancy, there were 10 (1.4%) children with hemorrhages; none were thought to be treatment related ( ).

Danaparoid

Danaparoid is a mixture of low-molecular-weight sulfated glycosaminoglycans. It is sometimes considered a LMWH, but is chemically distinct from heparin. Danaparoid is categorized in the class of heparinoids because it contains the structurally related heparan sulfate (84%), dermatan sulfate (12%) and a small amount of chondroitin sulfate (4%). Danaparoid catalyzes the inactivation of factor Xa via antithrombin and heparin-cofactor II. Its anti-factor Xa activity is considerably greater than its anti-thrombin activity. It is used for the prophylaxis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis in situations when heparin should not be used; for example, in patients with immune-mediated (type II) heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Danaparoid shows a slight serological cross reactivity (5%) with heparin-induced antibodies with a frequency of clinical cross reactions of approximately 3%.

Examinations of human cord blood and experimental data in animals do not demonstrate a significant placental transfer of danaparoid ( , ). No teratogenicity was observed among 87 pregnancies exposed to danaparoid ( , , , ). Maternal treatment with danaparoid occurred in the first trimester of pregnancy in 61% of these pregnancies. To date, direct fetal toxicity has not been reported. The risk to the embryo or fetus associated with maternal use of danaparoid during pregnancy is unclear at this time.

Recommendation

Heparins are by appropriate indication the method of choice for anticoagulation during pregnancy. In practice, the use of LMWH has by far replaced that of UFH which is reserved for special indications. In cases of heparin intolerance (allergic reactions, HIT II) or resistance it is appropriate to use danaparoid as an alternative anticoagulant. The potential for increased bleeding is an important consideration prior to surgical interventions and prior to delivery.

Protamines

Pharmacology and toxicology

Protamines are simple (alkaline) proteins found in the sperm of several species. Protamine-HCl and protamine sulfate are agents that are used intravenously to reverse the effects of heparin prior to surgical procedures or for the treatment of heparin overdose. They are basic polypeptides that neutralize the strongly negatively charged heparin by complexing with it to form a stable salt. Protamine-heparin complexes have no inhibitory effect on coagulation. The ability of protamines to neutralize heparin varies with heparin chain length. Short chain fragments cannot be neutralized with protamine, resulting in incomplete neutralization of anti-factor Xa activity. This explains why protamine has weaker effectiveness against LMWH than UFH. Protamines are also mixed with insulin formulations and administered subcutaneously to prolong the glucose-lowering activity of insulin. No data has been published regarding the embryo- or fetotoxic effects of protamine. However, in animal studies, protamines have been found to inhibit angiogenesis ( ) and, therefore, may pose a risk to the developing embryo. There are two case reports of neonatal bradycardia, hypotension and hypotonicity after maternal administration of protamine prior to delivery ( , ). These effects are similar to side effects that have been reported in adults following administration of protamine.

Recommendation

Protamines can be used acutely during pregnancy in cases of heparin overdose. However, continual/chronic use of protamines during pregnancy is not recommended because there are no data to support such usage.

Thrombin-inhibitors

Compounds such as lepirudin and desirudin are recombinant hirudin derivatives that directly inhibit free and fibrin-bound thrombin and block its activity. Bivalirudin , argatroban , and dabigatran etexilate are synthetic thrombin inhibitors. Hirudin and its derivatives are bivalent direct thrombin inhibitors that bind to both the active site and exosite 1. Bivalirudin binds reversibly to thrombin, so its inhibitory effect is transient resulting in a diminished risk of major bleeding. Argatroban and dabigatran etexilate are univalent direct thrombin inhibitors that bind only to the active site of thrombin ( ). Dabigatran etexilate was the first new oral direct thrombin inhibitor to be approved for long-term anticoagulant treatment ( ). Direct thrombin inhibitors are used in cases of heparin intolerability, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Bivalirudin is used in acute coronary syndrome together with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel in patients who undergo a percutaneous coronary intervention. Dabigatran etexilate is used for thromboprophylaxis in patients after hip replacement or knee replacement and prevention of strokes in atrial fibrillation. No information regarding the use of bivalirudin, desirudin, or dabigatran etexilate in pregnancy has been published.

Ten case reports describe healthy infants born to women who were treated with lepirudin or argatroban at different times during pregnancy ( , , , , , , , , , ). Exposure during the first trimester occurred in four of the reported cases. Although one of the children was born with a patent foramen ovale and small ventricular septal defect, maternal treatment with argatroban is unlikely to have caused these defects since exposure did not occur until the third trimester ( ).

Recommendation

The above-mentioned medications should only be prescribed during pregnancy if they are urgently needed, i.e. with heparin intolerance (allergic skin reactions, HIT II) and in the absence of safer alternatives. Caution is required when using thrombin inhibitors prior to surgery or during the intrapartum period because of an increased risk of maternal hemorrhage.

You're Reading a Preview

Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles

Become membership

If you are a member. Log in here