Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Acute pain is one of the most common emergency department presenting problems.
Pain-rating scales appropriate to the age and development of the child are useful in establishing a child’s level of pain and assessing the adequacy of analgesia.
Adopt a multimodal (nonpharmacological, pharmacological) and multidisciplinary (medical staff, play therapists, parents) approach to pain management.
Tailor interventions to the individual child.
Become familiar with dose, administration and potential complications of a range of analgesics.
Combining drugs without detailed knowledge and training risks serious adverse outcomes.
Analgesia is the relief of the perception of pain without sedation.
Pain is a more difficult concept to define precisely or to measure objectively. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience, associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage. It is the significant emotional dimension that creates considerable variability in how a painful stimulus is experienced and thus how the interactions of physiological, psychological, developmental and situational factors can modify behaviour in both the short and long term.
Acute pain in children is one of the most common reasons for presentation to the emergency department (ED). In addition to the underlying injury or illness, subsequent medical procedures may also engender pain which is often associated with increased anxiety, avoidance behaviour, systemic symptoms and parental distress. Treating pain may not only relieve acute suffering but also decrease ongoing anxiety and negative memories, facilitate medical investigations and aid cooperation with other nonpainful procedures and treatments. The use of analgesia in procedural sedation is discussed in more detail in Chapter 3.2 .
Pain may be classified in a number of ways, for example, by severity, cause or pathophysiology. A simple classification is shown in Box 3.1.1 . Most commonly in the paediatric ED setting it is procedural and acute pain which need to be addressed.
Procedural | Transient while stimulus is applied but before significant tissue damage occurs |
Acute | Significant local tissue damage with acute inflammation but normal innervation |
Intractable (chronic) | Continuing in the absence of acute inflammation and normal healing |
Neuropathic | Associated with peripheral, central or autonomic nerve damage |
Children with painful conditions can be difficult to assess, and their pain is often still underestimated and undertreated. Children often receive less analgesia than adults, and the administration of analgesia varies by age, with the youngest patients at the highest risk of receiving inadequate analgesia. ,
Children’s pain can be misjudged because assessment requires tools that account for the wide range of children’s developmental stages. Pain is often undermedicated because of fears of oversedation, respiratory depression, addiction and unfamiliarity with use of sedative and analgesic agents in children.
ED staff should be proficient in the assessment and safe management of pain in children. Early and appropriate analgesia may be best achieved by using a systematic approach with well-developed pain management educational programmes, specific pain assessment and management policies and benchmarked standards for time-to-analgesia within the ED.
Assessment of pain should be individualised, continuous, measured and documented. Pain assessment and measurement tools have been developed that are suitable for children of different ages and developmental stages. Accurate assessment requires a detailed pain history and consideration of the complexity of the child’s pain perception and the influence of situational, psychological and developmental factors. Four useful means of recognising pain in children are outlined in Box 3.1.2 .
The child’s self-report of pain
Behavioural changes, e.g. crying, guarding, facial grimacing
Physiological changes, e.g. pallor, tachycardia and tachypnoea
Pathophysiological process, e.g. fracture or burn
Because of its subjective nature, pain is best assessed using the child’s self-report. Observational assessment scoring may be useful when the child is too young or self-report is not possible, (e.g. children with cognitive impairment). Pain ratings provided by parents or regular carers may also be used. However, whilst there is good correlation between the child’s and the parent’s assessment of pain intensity, parents tend to underscore more severe pain being experienced by their children. The introduction of patient-held Pain Passports, which record regular self or parental pain assessments using some of the tools described below, have been shown to improve the assessment, provision and timeliness of analgesia. ,
Physiological measures (e.g. heart rate and respiratory rate) may be useful in pain assessment in nonverbal or sedated children but may be confounded by stress reactions. For example, the child who is febrile or an infant who is hungry may give inappropriately high scores.
Specific pain assessment tools employing behavioural and vital sign observations have been developed for neonates (e.g. CRIES) and nonverbal (e.g. FLACC) or cognitively impaired children (e.g. r-FLACC, NCCPC-R or COMFORT tools). Pain scales for older children able to self-report, such as the Faces rating scale, which uses facial expressions depicting increasing pain or simple numerical or analogue scales, are commonly employed. Some of these age-dependent pain rating scales are outlined in Table 3.1.1 .
CRIES pain rating scale | |||
The CRIES scale can be used in neonates and young infants up to a few months of age. It was originally designed for postoperative pain assessment; however, it can be employed for other procedures where baseline vital signs are known. Each of the 5 categories is scored from 0 to 2, and the scores are added to get a total score from 0 to 10. | |||
0 | 1 | 2 | |
Crying | No | High pitched | Inconsolable |
Requires O 2 for Sat >95% | No | <30% O 2 | >30% O 2 |
Increased vital signs | HR & BP less than or equal to patient’s baseline (e.g. pre-op) | HR & BP increased by <20% of patient’s baseline | HR & BP increased by >20% of patient’s baseline |
Expression | None | Grimace | Grimace/grunt |
Sleepless | No | Wakes at frequent intervals | Constantly awake |
FLACC scale | |||
The FLACC scale is a behavioural scale for scoring pain in children between the ages of 2 months and 7 years or in persons unable to communicate. Each of the 5 categories is scored from 0 to 2, and the scores are added to get a total score from 0 to 10. | |||
0 | 1 | 2 | |
Face | No particular expression or smile | Occasional grimace or frown, withdrawn, disinterested | Frequent to constant frown, clenched jaw, quivering chin |
Legs | Normal position or relaxed | Uneasy, restless, tense | Kicking or legs drawn up |
Activity | Lying quietly, normal position, moves easily | Squirming, shifting back and forth, tense | Arched, rigid or jerking |
Cry | No cry (awake or asleep) | Moans or whimpers, occasional complaint | Crying steadily, screams or sobs, frequent complaints |
Consolability | Content, relaxed | Reassured by occasional touching, hugging or ‘talking to’, distractible | Difficult to console or comfort |
The FLACC behavioural pain assessment scale © University of Michigan Health System can be reproduced for clinical or research use. | |||
Faces rating scales (FRS) | |||
These scales can be used with young children (as young as 4 years of age). They also work well for older children and adolescents, including those who speak a different language. Ask the patient to choose the face that best describes how they feel. The far left face indicates ‘no hurt’, and the far right face indicates ‘hurts worst’. |
|||
Numerical rating score (NRS) | |||
This tool may be used for children over the age of 6–8 years. Instruct the patient to rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 (‘no pain’) to 10 (‘the worst pain imaginable’). |
Optimal analgesia is achieved by the combination of both nonpharmacological and pharmacological strategies with regular pain assessments. When using drugs there should also be careful consideration of the most appropriate route and dosage and close monitoring for adverse effects.
Pain management strategies should be individualised for the child’s level of pain and the anticipated discomfort of any procedure to be undertaken. Choice of agent will also depend on local resources, familiarity with doses, duration of action, adverse effects and contraindications.
There are many nonpharmacological techniques that can be used to mitigate pain and distress in the ED and complement the use of pharmacological methods. Some of these are listed in Box 3.1.3 .
Calm friendly nonclinical atmosphere
Toys, mobiles, pictures and videos
Parental presence
Age-appropriate communication
Clear confident instructions
Distraction techniques
Hypnosis and biofeedback
Art/stories
Music/video/TV
Interactive computer games
Guided imagery
Muscle relaxation and deep-breathing techniques
Reinforcement of coping behaviours
Massage/rubbing
Comfort swaddling (infants)
Heat/cold techniques
Immobilisation and elevation (injured part)
Comforter (favourite blanket/soft toy)
Providing a nonthreatening, friendly environment, which might include wall decorations of animals or familiar cartoon/TV characters, can help reduce anxiety. Positioning of the child can be important. For example, babies may be more settled when swaddled; conversely, constraint in toddlers can be distressing, so allow a child to take up the most comfortable position and provide pillows to support an injured limb. Other physical techniques include slings, splints or other immobilisation methods and application of ice or cold/heat packs. Gentle, unhurried and confident handling can often minimise distress and pain.
Older children may respond to age-appropriate explanations and providing realistic expectations on the management of their pain. It is helpful to gain a rapport and to be honest when reassuring. Claims of the child feeling no pain should be avoided as they are often soon disproved and risk loss of confidence or cooperation from the child and parents.
Parents play an important role as a familiar comforter in unfamiliar surroundings. They can be included in many distraction techniques. However, overt parental anxiety can fuel a child’s discomfort.
Play therapists are a good resource if available. They are trained in many distraction strategies and can also be very useful in preparing a child for a painful procedure. Specific distraction strategies, which can be provided by staff or parents, may include toys, bubbles, guided imagery, music, TV and DVD/video players, hand-held game consoles and smart phones or tablets. In infants, breast-feeding or the use of a pacifier may be comforting.
Other methods, more commonly used in the chronic setting, include reinforcement of coping behaviours, hypnosis, biofeedback, muscle relaxation and deep-breathing techniques. Recently some promise has been shown in adapting battlefield acupuncture techniques to auricular acupressure (using small beads taped to specific points on the ear) for treating pain in the paediatric ED.
The choice of agent is dependent on acuity, severity and source of the pain, route availability, expected duration and patient factors such as age or genetic variation.
Some of the more commonly used agents discussed later have doses detailed in Table 3.1.2 .
Classification | Doses | Comments |
---|---|---|
Enteral analgesics | ||
Paracetamol | 15–30 mg/kg PO/PR (<3 months 10 mg/kg) | 30 mg/kg stat. only as a single dose (check no recent doses of paracetamol) |
Ibuprofen (NSAID) | 5–10 mg/kg PO | Avoid in dehydration, renal impairment, GI ulceration, coagulopathy, severe asthma |
Oxycodone | 0.1–0.2 mg/kg PO | Better analgesia and fewer side effects than codeine |
Tramadol | 0.5–2 mg/kg PO/IV | Risk of interactions with other drugs (see text) |
Sucrose (24–25%) | 0.1–0.5 mL PO repeated up to 2 mL per procedure and maximum of 5 mL/day | Young infants Ideally combine with nonnutritive sucking |
Inhaled analgesics | ||
Nitrous oxide | 50:50 mix inhalation agent (ENTONOX) N 2 O continuous flow variable mix 30–70% with oxygen |
Rapid onset; continuous flow delivery system allows use in young children/short duration of action. Vomiting can occur; contraindicated with pneumothorax/chest injuries |
Fentanyl | 1.5 mcg/kg per dose (maximum 75 mcg) | |
Ketamine | 1 mg/kg IN/NEB per dose | Child >3 months Dizziness, unpleasant taste, drowsiness |
Dexmedetomidine | 1 mcg/kg IN/NEB per dose | Potential for hypotension, bradycardia at higher doses |
Parenteral analgesics | ||
Morphine | 0.05–0.1 mg/kg per dose (<3 months) IV/IM0.1–0.2 mg/kg per dose (>3 months) IV/IM Infusion (>3 months) 0.01–0.04 mg/kg per h |
Cardiorespiratory depression with IV/IM doses; IV dose preferred |
Fentanyl | 1–2 mcg/kg per dose IV/IM | Less histamine response and better renal profile than morphine |
Ketamine | 0.25–0.5 mg/kg IV per dose Infusion 0.1–0.3 mg/kg per h |
Child >3 months See Chapter 3.2 for more details on contraindications and side effects. |
Opioid reversal agent | ||
Naloxone | 10 mcg/kg IV | May need to repeat doses |
Local anaesthetic agents | ||
Topical | ||
Surface EMLA | Eutectic mixture of lidocaine (lignocaine) 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% | Requires 60 minutes postapplication to achieve satisfactory dermal anaesthesia |
AnGel/Ametop | Amethocaine 4% | Requires 30–45 minutes postapplication to achieve satisfactory dermal anaesthesia |
Laceraine | Mixture of 4% lidocaine, 0.5% tetracaine and adrenaline (epinephrine) 1:1000 maximum dose 0.1 mL/kg | Requires >20 minutes of good contact with wound to provide anaesthesia; may require supplementation with small doses infiltrated LA |
Infiltration | ||
Lidocaine 1–2% | 3 mg/kg maximum dose without adrenaline 7 mg/kg maximum dose with adrenaline |
Pain of injection can be minimised by using narrow-gauge needles (e.g. 31 G), slow infiltration, infiltrating through wound edges, pretreatment with topical LA, buffering and warming |
Regional blocks – femoral blocks | ||
Bupivacaine 0.25–0.5% | 2 mg/kg Volume: 0.8 mL/kg 0.25% (≤20 kg) or 0.4 mL/kg 0.5% (>20 kg) Maximum 30 mL |
Doses are for bolus dose block. Onset 15–30 minutes. Can last 7–14 hours |
Ropivacaine 0.5% | 3.0 mg/kg Volume: 0.6 mL/kg Maximum 30 mL |
May be less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine. Dose is for bolus dose block. Onset 15–30 minutes. Can last 7–14 hours |
Intravenous regional block – Bier block | ||
Lidocaine 0.5% or prilocaine 0.5% | 3.0 mg/kg IV Volume: 0.6 mL/kg Maximum 40 mL |
Onset 5–15 minutes |
Management of LA toxicity | ||
General | Oxygen. Use conventional therapies to treat hypotension, bradycardia and tachyarrhythmia | |
Consider lipid emulsion 20% if significant toxicity | 1.5 mL/kg IV over 1 min (can repeat twice every 5 min) and start infusion at 15 mL/kg per hour. Double the rate any time after 5 min, if not stable or inadequate circulation. Maximum total dose 12 mL/kg | |
Full algorithm may be downloaded from The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain & Ireland at https://www.aagbi.org/sites/default/files/la_toxicity_2010_0.pdf . |
Apart from sucrose, these agents may also be administered via a naso- or orogastric tube and a gastrostomy tube if in a suitable liquid or crushed tablet form.
Become a Clinical Tree membership for Full access and enjoy Unlimited articles
If you are a member. Log in here